Solent Authorities Devolution and the Future of Local Government

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Solent Authorities Devolution and the Future of Local Government www.pwc.co.uk Final Solent Authorities Devolution and the future of local government Confidential November 2016 Devolution and the future of local government in the Solent Final Contents Important notice .......................................................................................................................... 1 Executive summary..................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 11 1.1. Purpose of this report 11 1.2. Hampshire and the Isle of Wight 11 1.3. Solent authorities 13 1.4. Local Economies 14 1.5. Local government in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight 17 1.6. The recent evolution of local government 19 1.7. The case for change and the Solent Devolution Deal 23 1.8. The path to devolution 24 2. Unitary authority options ...................................................................................................... 27 2.1. The unitary authority options considered 27 2.2. Status quo (baseline) 28 2.3. Three unitary authorities 28 2.4. Five unitary authorities 29 2.5. Commentary 30 3. Providing value for money and delivering positive outcomes ............................................... 31 3.1. Approach 31 3.2. Baseline 31 3.3. Disaggregation of County Council income and expenditure 33 3.4. Economy and efficiency 34 3.5. Summary Results 35 3.6. Payback period 37 3.7. Council tax harmonisation 38 3.8. Summary and conclusions from value for money and cost of transition analysis 38 4. Strong local leadership and accountability........................................................................... 40 4.1. Local government reform and the opportunity to strengthen leadership and accountability 40 4.2. Clarifying accountability 40 4.3. Ensuring simplicity 46 4.4. A Mayoral combined authority 46 4.5. Summary and conclusions 46 Devolution and the future of local government in the Solent Final 5. Strong local leadership and accountability........................................................................... 48 5.1. Introduction 48 5.2. Current baseline position 48 5.3. Future opportunity 49 5.4. Developing the better service tests 50 5.5. Appropriate scale 52 5.6. Citizen centricity 53 5.7. Connected government 55 5.8. Empowered to deliver 56 5.9. Delivering the promise 58 5.10. Continuously innovate 59 5.11. Summary 59 6. Summary of findings and key conclusions ............................................................................ 61 6.1. Summary of findings 61 6.2. Key conclusions 63 Appendix A: Technical financial information ........................................................................... 64 A.1. Three unitary option 64 A.2. Five unitary option 66 A.3. Council tax harmonisation 68 A.4 Disaggregation of Revenue Support Grant (RSG) 76 Devolution and the future of local government in the Solent Final Important notice This document has been prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) for Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council acting on behalf of Portsmouth City Council, Southampton City Council, Isle of Wight Council, East Hampshire District Council, Eastleigh Borough Council, Fareham Borough Council, Gosport Borough Council, Havant Borough Council (all collectively referred to as the “Solent authorities”) in accordance with the order form (CGP47) dated 02 June 2016, as varied by the order variation form (001) dated 08 August 2016. Accordingly, the contents of this document are strictly private and confidential. This paper contains information obtained or derived from a variety of sources as indicated within this document. PwC has not sought to establish the reliability of those sources or verified the information so provided. Accordingly no representation or warranty of any kind (whether express or implied) is given by PwC to any person (except to the Solent authorities under the relevant terms of the Engagement) as to the accuracy or completeness of the report. Moreover the report does not absolve any third party from conducting its own due diligence in order to verify its contents. For the avoidance of doubt this Engagement is not an assurance engagement and PwC is not providing assurance nor are the services being performed in accordance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (ISAE 3000). PwC accepts no duty of care to any person (except to the Solent authorities) for the preparation of this report. Accordingly, regardless of the form of action, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, and to the extent permitted by applicable law, PwC accepts no liability of any kind and disclaims all responsibility for the consequences of any person (other than the Solent authorities on the above basis) acting or refraining to act in reliance on the briefing or for any decisions made or not made which are based upon such report. In the event that, pursuant to a request which the Solent authorities have received under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 or the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (as the same may be amended or re-enacted from time to time) or any subordinate legislation made there under (collectively, the “Legislation”), the Commissioning Councils are required to disclose any information contained in this report, it will notify PwC promptly and will consult with PwC prior to disclosing such report. The Commissioning Council agrees to pay due regard to any representations which PwC may make in connection with such disclosure. If, following consultation with PwC, the Council discloses this document or any part thereof, it shall ensure that any disclaimer which PwC has included or may subsequently wish to include in the information is reproduced in full in any copies disclosed. Private and Confidential 1 Devolution and the future of local government in the Solent Final Executive summary Devolution and future of local government in the Solent Across Hampshire and the Isle of Wight local government is at risk of turning inward as a result of fallout from failed discussions on a devolution settlement for the Hampshire & the Isle of Wight area, which sought to devolve power from Whitehall. This has brought to the surface tensions which are symptomatic of concerns about the longer term sustainability of existing arrangements for local government. Since then the parties involved in the previous Hampshire and the Isle of Wight devolution prospectus have been considering their next steps as follows: Hampshire County Council has developed and consulted on its own options for unitary solutions; Solent authorities are focussed on securing a combined authority to bring new funding and new powers to support the economy of the area as the first step on their devolution journey; and Heart of Hampshire authorities want to ensure their residents and businesses have the same opportunity to benefit from devolution as the rest of Hampshire. Purpose of this document This document was commissioned by the Solent authorities, who have sought advice on options for the most effective and efficient form of local government in the context of opportunities for devolution, combined authorities and the prospect of further unitarisation. The authorities intend to establish a strong case for improved governance and devolution which will support the delivery of sustainable services and improved outcomes for local residents. In this report we have provided an independent assessment of various options for unitary solutions across the Solent. The report does not make specific recommendations but it offers views on the suitability of arrangements for the Solent authorities. The provision of local government in the Solent needs to be addressed as part of a 'whole system’ of local government in the area which extends across the existing geography covered by Hampshire County Council and the 11 district councils. This report is part of a suite of reports using common methodology that analyses the impact of potential unitary authority options across the geography. The analysis within this report supports the following conclusions: Business as usual does not look sustainable from a financial viewpoint for the majority of councils. This exacerbates the case for change. When you add the benefits from reorganisation and transformation the budgets are hugely improved, however some configurations still display deficits. Status quo without a recalibration of district and Hampshire County Council relationships is undesirable. An enhanced status quo utilising a combined authority for Solent would be an attractive outcome and would provide a strong foundation for joint working and accountability to improve the design and delivery of services for residents If any future unitary configuration is desired, the 3 unitary authority options appears to have the most strengths and least weaknesses. On devolution, the Heart of Hampshire authorities support the ambition of the Solent combined authority. It is clear that all of the councils would be stronger working together on a local consensus to secure devolved powers, control and resources from national to local bodies, while respecting the differences within Hampshire and the Isle of Wight. Any solution will require local consensus and it is clear relationships need to be strengthened to enable a focus on better serving residents and businesses. All parties agree the status quo needs to change. Private and Confidential 2 Devolution and the future
Recommended publications
  • East Cowes Town Council
    East Cowes Town Council Town Hall, York Avenue, East Cowes, Isle of Wight, PO32 6R Tel: (01983) 299082 Email: [email protected] Minutes of a meeting of East Cowes Town Council held remotely by Zoom on 18th February 2021 at 6pm Present Chair: Cllr Rann (Mayor) Councillors: Love (Deputy Mayor), Packham, Lloyd, Hendry, Webster, Walker, Palin Clerk: S Chilton Assistant Clerk: C Gale Also present: John Cattle, Zoe Thomson, Laura Reid (Youth Worker) and 7 members of the public Public Forum • A member of the public asked if a touring caravan abandoned on Kingston Road is being dealt with. It has been reported to Island Roads and the owner has been contacted. • A member of the public asked if Saunders Way has been adopted. Cllr Hendry stated that Isle of Wight Council, Island Roads and Barratts had reached agreement. A consultation on the speed limit which concludes on 5th March must be completed before further work can be done. • A member of the public raised concerns about the impact of the completion of Saunders Way on other routes and parking in the town. He will email the ward councillors with his questions for them to follow up. One minutes silence was held in memory of the Facilities Officer Mick Collis who sadly passed away in January. Meeting opened at 6.15p.m. 15/21 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE No apologies for absence were received. 16/21 DECLARATIONS OF INTERESTS 2.1 Cllr Palin declared a non-pecuniary interest as a member of the Floating Bridge Stakeholders Group. Cllr Hendry declared a non-pecuniary interest as Ward Councillor for Whippingham and Osborne.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Strategic Needs Assessment
    Joint Strategic Needs Assessment The Isle of Wight is a Better Place to Live – Demographics & Population Last updated: September 2013 Introduction The following pages give general information about the size of the Island and how its communities are distributed, a range of population information and projected changes to numbers over time. Island Summary 94.8% of residents are ‘White British’ origin although this proportion has reduced since the 2001 Census There are 69,216 residential households Source th Isle of Wight Council Revenues and Benefits as at 4 October 2013 Around 1 in 6 households on the Island are The average house price for the Island as at May occupied by a single person over 65 th 2013 was £149,755 Source Land Registry The Isle of Wight has the 6 highest divorce rate in the UK (9.1% of residents aged 16 or The following chart demonstrates the changes in over) property prices for the Island over the past three years. Island Geography The Isle of Wight lies off the south coast of mainland England and covers an area of 146.8 sq miles (38.016 hectares, or 380.16 km2) Based on the 2011 Census, there is an average population per hectare of 38,016 persons, or 3.6 persons per hectare2. This compares with an average of 4.1 persons per hectare2 for England and a regional average of 4.5 persons per hectare2 for the South East. Source 2011 Census, Office for National Statistics (ONS) The Island has a 39 Electoral Wards served by Source Land Registry 40 Councillors (Brading, St Helens and Bembridge has two).
    [Show full text]
  • Buckinghamshire County Council Planning Obligations
    Buckinghamshire County Council Planning Obligations Dave griped her girder humblingly, bleary and respectful. Obstetric Paige always sandbagged his inhalators if Hari is provoked or deodorising forbiddenly. Pete whet eft while stibial Guthrie deep-sixes cryptography or valeted flauntingly. Application of Laing Homes Ltd v Buckinghamshire County Council Admin. The local in Authority Buckinghamshire County building has. For example both may leave home to enhance legal obligations or to head out. About them next summer why in book a vote no obligation appraisal via video call. Why attending Buckinghamshire Council meeting on the 9th December I hate very. At patient request after the Buckinghamshire County chair the Corporation. Learn about plans. Jury Duty Bucks County. If garages are to all levels of secondary school pupils resident in plans. Mortgage Advice Bureau. Care and county council believes the plans. The Isle of Wight Council and be restructured to sitting the actual. The county council in payment plan includes staying in place in the process will also comply with the fairest way. Buckinghamshire authorities in recruitment drive for lawyers ahead. Deed for planning obligations they remain the councils and relevant year period of state will be kept to provide clarity on a management of kensington and to changes. Employee shall not move, and places that this dataset provides information is still move, and local level of the site or the pdf includes an. Freemason Members List. A Contract written Notice by Buckinghamshire County as Value 2M. Cllr Robin Stuchbury Videos Facebook. Consideration should be planning obligations policy, buckinghamshire county of the plans networks by car parks and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Isle of Wight in the English Landscape
    THE ISLE OF WIGHT IN THE ENGLISH LANDSCAPE: MEDIEVAL AND POST-MEDIEVAL RURAL SETTLEMENT AND LAND USE ON THE ISLE OF WIGHT HELEN VICTORIA BASFORD A study in two volumes Volume 1: Text and References Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Bournemouth University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2013 2 Copyright Statement This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and due acknowledgement must always be made of the use of any material contained in, or derived from, this thesis. 3 4 Helen Victoria Basford The Isle of Wight in the English Landscape: Medieval and Post-Medieval Rural Settlement and Land Use Abstract The thesis is a local-scale study which aims to place the Isle of Wight in the English landscape. It examines the much discussed but problematic concept of ‘islandness’, identifying distinctive insular characteristics and determining their significance but also investigating internal landscape diversity. This is the first detailed academic study of Isle of Wight land use and settlement from the early medieval period to the nineteenth century and is fully referenced to national frameworks. The thesis utilises documentary, cartographic and archaeological evidence. It employs the techniques of historic landscape characterisation (HLC), using synoptic maps created by the author and others as tools of graphic analysis. An analysis of the Isle of Wight’s physical character and cultural roots is followed by an investigation of problems and questions associated with models of settlement and land use at various scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Isle of Wight Council CHILDREN’S SERVICES CHILDCARE SUFFICENCY ASSESSMENT 2014 - 2017
    Isle of Wight Council CHILDREN’S SERVICES CHILDCARE SUFFICENCY ASSESSMENT 2014 - 2017 CHILDCARE SUFFICIENCY REPORT – Select Committee – July 16th 2015 Document Information Title: Children’s Services Childcare Sufficiency Assessment Status: Final Current Version: V1 Author: Gillian Pink, Childcare Sufficiency Officer, Learnin & Development, Children’s Services Directorate [email protected] (01983) 823153 – (01983) 821000 - 8414 Sponsor: John Coughlan CBE, Director of Children’s Services Children’s Services Directorate [email protected] (01983) 821000 Consultation: 1nd March 2015 - 17th May 2015 Pre-schools Schools including parents o Via Questionnaire to parents Family Information Zone Approved by: Director of Children’s Services Approval Date: Review Refreshed every one year Frequency: Next Review: June 2016 Version History Version Date Description V1 3 June 2015 Initial draft V2 14. July 2015 Final draft V3 30 July 2015 Final 2 CHILDCARE SUFFICIENCY REPORT – Select Committee – July 16th 2015 Contents Document Information 2 Contents 3 1 Executive Summary 4 2 Introduction 6 3 What is Childcare 6 4 Local Context 7 5 Population - Demography 9 6 The Welfare Reform agenda and links with Childcare 10 7 Quality of Provision 18 8 Overview of Isle of Eight Early Years & Childcare Market 18 9 Early Years Education – Funding Trends 23 10 Average Childcare Costs 26 11 Provider Sustainability and Demand Trends 17 12 Growth of Places 20 Summary Appendix 1: Provider list Appendix 2 Indices of Multiple Deprivation Appendix 3 Early Years Single Funding Formula Factors Appendix 4 Help with childcare costs Appendix 5 Locality Map Vision Statement – Recommendation for Action Plan 3 CHILDCARE SUFFICIENCY REPORT – Select Committee – July 16th 2015 1.
    [Show full text]
  • UASC Capacity Support - Proposed Distribution of £21.3M Allocation Is Based on Latest Available Home Office Management Data Capturing Numbers at September
    UASC capacity support - proposed distribution of £21.3m Allocation is based on latest available Home Office management data capturing numbers at September. The information on NTS transfers has been confirmed by the Strategic Migration Partnership leads and is accurate up to December 2017. Please see attached FAQ and methodology document for further information. Local Authority Amount Total 21,258,203.00 London Borough of Barking and Dagenham £ 141,094.00 London Borough of Barnet £ 282,189.00 Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Bath and North East Somerset Council £ 94,063.00 Bedford Council (Unitary) £ 94,063.00 London Borough of Bexley £ 282,189.00 Birmingham City Council £ 188,126.00 Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Bournemouth Borough Council £ 141,094.00 Bracknell Forest Council £ 94,063.00 Bradford Metropolitan District Council £ 94,063.00 London Borough of Brent £ 329,219.00 Brighton and Hove City Council £ 188,126.00 Bristol City Council £ 188,126.00 London Borough of Bromley £ 141,094.00 Buckinghamshire County Council £ 188,126.00 Bury Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Cambridgeshire County Council £ 235,157.00 London Borough of Camden £ 329,219.00 Central Bedfordshire Council £ 282,189.00 Cheshire East Council (Unitary) £ 94,063.00 Cheshire West and Chester Council £ 94,063.00 City of London £ 94,063.00 City of Nottingham Council £ 94,063.00 Cornwall Council (Unitary) £ 94,063.00 Coventry City
    [Show full text]
  • Land Adjacent to 182 York Avenue, East Cowes, Isle of Wight Po32 6Be – Proposed Freehold Sale
    30/08 DECISION UNDER DELEGATED POWERS DECISION CANNOT BE TAKEN BEFORE FRIDAY, 13 JUNE 2008 Title LAND ADJACENT TO 182 YORK AVENUE, EAST COWES, ISLE OF WIGHT PO32 6BE – PROPOSED FREEHOLD SALE Report to the Cabinet Member for the Economy, Planning and Property Purpose 1. This report is to consider the sale of Isle of Wight Council’s (IWC) freehold interest of land adjacent to 182 York Avenue, East Cowes, to a special purchaser, the British Red Cross (BRC). BRC currently occupy the premises, benefiting from a long leasehold interest. 2. A special purchaser is classed as a person (or body) with an existing interest in the land in question or adjacent land where that interest is such that the person (or body) may be prepared to pay above market value or where, because of the interest, the Council may be better able to achieve its corporate objectives (such as economic and social regeneration) by working with the special purchaser. Outcomes 3. The IWC’s interest is transferred to the BRC for the sum of £5,000 (Five Thousand Pounds), incorporating an overage clause (please see paragraph 10 below) and IWC’s professional fees up to £750 plus VAT. Confidential / Exempt 4. Not applicable. Items Background 5. The approximate location of the subject property is shown outlined red on the attached plan for illustrative purposes only (Appendix A). 6. The IWC has been approached by the BRC’s Agent to establish whether the IWC would sell their freehold interest in the subject premises. The BRC’s Agent informs us that the BRC wish to undertake extensive works to improve the property, including re- roofing, works to the kitchen and improving disabled access.
    [Show full text]
  • Regeneration Programme
    ISLE OF WIGHT COUNCIL REGENERATION PROGRAMME C - 9 Contents 1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Document purpose ............................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Structure of the document .................................................................................................. 7 1.3 Scope .................................................................................................................................. 7 2 STRATEGIC CONTEXT .................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Isle of Wight today .............................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Global and UK trends affecting the Isle of Wight ............................................................... 10 2.3 Coastal town issues in the UK ........................................................................................... 11 2.4 UK policy affecting development finance .......................................................................... 12 2.4.1. Business rate retention .................................................................................................... 12 2.4.2. New Homes Bonus ........................................................................................................... 13 2.4.3 Devolution packages ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity Peer Challenge Draft Report
    APPENDIX A Corporate Peer Challenge Isle of Wight Council On site 20-24 November 2017 Final Feedback Report Feb 5 2018 B - 9 1. Executive Summary The Council has made good progress since its 2014 Corporate Peer Challenge and is in a stronger position to meet the significant challenges of delivering public services on the Isle of Wight (the Island). Improvement is being made on developing a different model and focus for local government working with other public service providers on the Island that could be of national significance. The Council has been bold in using and examining different methods of service delivery either through commissioning services, entering into partnerships or looking at being more commercially minded. Ambitious plans for regeneration and economic growth offer potential to grow the tax base and address housing need and deprivation. Recent LGA public opinion survey results show the impact of sustained hard work over recent years in improving outcomes. Partners now view the Council as a more credible public sector partner and our sense was that they want to see it take a broader leadership role on the Island. This was a refrain heard from business, from other public services, the voluntary sector, and Parish and Town Councils. With a clear political mandate since May 2017 and a more stable and dynamic CMT it possesses greater capacity to achieve this. There is an important opportunity and appetite to bring partners and the community together to articulate a set of long term goals for the whole Island, in a way that plays to the Island’s strengths and unique assets as well as to its challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Island's Demographics and Population Isle of Wight Facts And
    The Island’s Demographics and Population Isle of Wight Facts and Figures 2011/12 Introduction The average house price for the Island as at July 2011 was £152,609. Source Land Registry The following pages offer an insight to the Island The following chart demonstrates the changes in property beginning with some general information about the size prices for the Island over the past three years of the Island and how its communities are distributed; through to a range of information relating to its population, and projected changes to numbers over time. Island Geography Population Based on the mid-2010 population figures of 140,500 people, the Isle of Wight was the tenth largest Unitary Authority in the South East region (Source ONS). The Isle of Wight lies off the south coast of mainland Resident Population England and covers an area of 146.8 sq miles 2 (ie, all those usually resident whatever their nationality): (38.016 hectares, or 380.16 km ) Isle of South East Great Based on a 2010 mid year population estimate, there 2010 Wight Region Britain is an average population density per square (000’s) (000’s) (000’s) kilometre (km2) of 370 persons, or 3.70 persons per All people 140.5 8,523.1 60,462.6 2 hectare . Males 68.3 4,183.2 29,758.9 Females 72.2 4,339.8 30,703.7 This compares with a national average of 401 2 (Source: ONS mid-year estimates) persons per km and regional average of 447 2 persons per km for the South East.
    [Show full text]
  • Isle of Wight Parking Strategy 2016-2021
    Isle of Wight Council Isle of Wight Parking Strategy 2016-2021 Draft Report March 2016 100 St John Street, London, EC1M 4EH Tel: +44 (0)20 7250 7500 Email: [email protected] www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands Isle of Wight Parking Strategy 2016-2021 Draft Report Document Control Project: Isle of Wight Parking Strategy 2016-2021 Client: Isle of Wight Council Job Number: A081175-38 File Origin: X:\Projects\2012\A080000\A081175-38 - Isle of Wight Parking Strategy\40 Reports\A081175-38 Isle of Wight Parking Strategy - Final Draft Report - 29032016.docx Document Checking: Prepared by: Cesar Calvo Signed: Contributed by: Robert Davies / Hannah Rowlinson Signed: Checked by: Stephen Evans Signed: Verified by: Paul Smith Signed: Issue Date Status 1 27/11/2015 Draft for Client internal review and comments. 2 22/01/2016 Second draft for Client internal review and comments. 3 11/02/2016 Third draft for Client internal review and comments. 4 29/03/2016 Final draft for Client internal review and comments. 5 www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands Isle of Wight Parking Strategy 2016-2021 Draft Report Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 6 The Need for an Effective Parking Strategy ..................................................................................... 7 Development of the Parking Strategy
    [Show full text]
  • List of Councils in England by Type
    List of councils in England by type There are a total of 343 councils in England: • Metropolitan districts (36) • London boroughs (32) plus the City of London • Unitary authorities (55) plus the Isles of Scilly • County councils (26) • District councils (192) Metropolitan districts (36) 1. Barnsley Borough Council 19. Rochdale Borough Council 2. Birmingham City Council 20. Rotherham Borough Council 3. Bolton Borough Council 21. South Tyneside Borough Council 4. Bradford City Council 22. Salford City Council 5. Bury Borough Council 23. Sandwell Borough Council 6. Calderdale Borough Council 24. Sefton Borough Council 7. Coventry City Council 25. Sheffield City Council 8. Doncaster Borough Council 26. Solihull Borough Council 9. Dudley Borough Council 27. St Helens Borough Council 10. Gateshead Borough Council 28. Stockport Borough Council 11. Kirklees Borough Council 29. Sunderland City Council 12. Knowsley Borough Council 30. Tameside Borough Council 13. Leeds City Council 31. Trafford Borough Council 14. Liverpool City Council 32. Wakefield City Council 15. Manchester City Council 33. Walsall Borough Council 16. North Tyneside Borough Council 34. Wigan Borough Council 17. Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 35. Wirral Borough Council 18. Oldham Borough Council 36. Wolverhampton City Council London boroughs (32) 1. Barking and Dagenham 17. Hounslow 2. Barnet 18. Islington 3. Bexley 19. Kensington and Chelsea 4. Brent 20. Kingston upon Thames 5. Bromley 21. Lambeth 6. Camden 22. Lewisham 7. Croyd on 23. Merton 8. Ealing 24. Newham 9. Enfield 25. Redbridge 10. Greenwich 26. Richmond upon Thames 11. Hackney 27. Southwark 12. Hammersmith and Fulham 28. Sutton 13. Haringey 29. Tower Hamlets 14.
    [Show full text]