Arxiv:2012.09463V1 [Quant-Ph] 17 Dec 2020 Have Also Been Studied
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Long-range connectivity in a superconducting quantum processor using a ring resonator Sumeru Hazra,1 Anirban Bhattacharjee,1 Madhavi Chand,1 Kishor V. Salunkhe,1, Sriram Gopalakrishnan,∗ Meghan P. Patankar,1, and R. Vijay1y 1Department of Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, 1 Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India (Dated: December 18, 2020) Qubit coherence and gate fidelity are typically considered the two most important metrics for characterizing a quantum processor. An equally important metric is inter-qubit connectivity as it minimizes gate count and allows implementing algorithms efficiently with reduced error. However, inter-qubit connectivity in superconducting processors tends to be limited to nearest neighbour due to practical constraints in the physical realization. Here, we introduce a novel superconducting architecture that uses a ring resonator as a multi-path coupling element with the qubits uniformly distributed throughout its circumference. Our planar design provides significant enhancement in connectivity over state of the art superconducting processors without any additional fabrication complexity. We theoretically analyse the qubit connectivity and experimentally verify it in a device capable of supporting up to twelve qubits where each qubit can be connected to nine other qubits. Our concept is scalable, adaptable to other platforms and has the potential to significantly accelerate progress in quantum computing, annealing, simulations and error correction. I. INTRODUCTION While recent experiments[5, 14] have implemented all- to-all connectivity by using a single bus resonator with Quantum information processors promise tremendous many superconducting qubits connected at its anti-nodes computational advantages in solving a broad class of (Fig. 1(b)), the inter-qubit coupling strength varies sig- problems, offering polynomial[1] and even sometimes nificantly from pair to pair and the close proximity of exponential[2] speed ups compared to the best known qubits leads to unwanted cross-talk. implementation in classical computers. Continual ef- In this article, we propose an alternative scalable ar- forts across several platforms have propelled the field chitecture for a dense network of superconducting qubits from proof of concept demonstrations with a few qubits with significantly enhanced connectivity. The key idea to actual processors with tens of qubits[3{6], leading to in this architecture is the use of a ring resonator as a the recent milestone of achieving quantum supremacy[7]. bus cavity capable of mediating interaction between sev- Quantum algorithms generally assume the ability to im- eral qubits. The qubits are distributed throughout the plement gates between any arbitrary pair of qubits in a circumference of the ring resonator and thus spatially processor. However, it is often impractical or topologi- separated. This provides good microwave isolation re- cally impossible to engineer a processor with arbitrarily sulting in individual qubit addressability and negligible long-range coupling. Therefore, in order to implement an qubit cross-talk[14]. The architecture proposed here is arbitrary quantum operation in such a constrained archi- completely agnostic to the kind of two-qubit gates to tecture, the quantum data needs to be transported across be implemented and is compatible with both flux acti- several connected qubits in the grid, leading to addi- vated gates with tunable qubits[11, 15{18] and microwave tional operations and consequently more errors. More re- drive activated gates with fixed frequency qubits[19, 20] cently, the importance of qubit connectivity for quantum offering wide compatibility. Further, this idea can be ex- annealers[8] and the performance of near term quantum tended to other architectures which rely on bus cavities processors as quantified by the quantum volume metric[9] for coupling [21, 22]. arXiv:2012.09463v1 [quant-ph] 17 Dec 2020 have also been studied. Among the two leading platforms for a practical quan- tum processor, all-to-all connectivity has been demon- II. RING RESONATOR COUPLER: THEORY strated in the ion-trap system for up to eleven qubits[10] whereas even the most powerful superconducting pro- The working principle of the ring resonator coupler cessors today provide only nearest neighbour connectiv- is based on wave interference between two independent ity achieved by direct capacitive coupling[11], tunable paths connecting any pair of qubits[23, 24]. We start by couplers[12] or bus resonators[13]. Fig. 1(a) shows a typ- considering only two transmon[25] qubits in a ring of cir- ical planar layout of qubits connected by bus resonators. cumference L and calculate the exchange coupling using a linearized model[26, 27]. We place the two qubits at an arbitrary angle θ with respect to each other so that ∗ Current affiliation: Institute of Quantum Computing, University they are connected by two transmission lines of char- of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada acteristic impedance ZR and lengths ` = (θ=2π)L and y Corresponding author: [email protected] `0 = (1 − (θ=2π))L as shown in Fig. 2(a). We denote the 2 (a) (b) Q3 Q4 Q2 Q5 Q1 Q1 Q6 Q12 Q7 Q2 Q11 Q8 Q10 Q9 (c) (d) Q12 Q11 Q1 Q10 Q2 Q9 Q3 Q8 Q4 Q7 Q5 Q6 FIG. 1. Inter-qubit connectivity in superconducting circuit architecture. (a) A standard bus resonator connecting two qubits positioned at its anti-nodes. Extension to a 2D grid layout which achieves uniform but only nearest neighbor coupling. (b) Several qubits placed in close proximity at each anti-node of a bus resonator produces all-to-all connectivity. However, one typically observes wide variation in inter-qubit coupling and unwanted cross-talk (grey dashed arrows) (c) Our design uses a ring resonator as a multi-path coupling element connecting several qubits. It offers a highly connected scalable qubit network with only two slightly different values for inter-qubit coupling with negligible cross-talk. (d) Image of a semi-assembled 3D cQED implementation of a 12-qubit network. The qubit slots (magnified in the inset) are placed 30o apart and the readout resonators are λ/4 sections of transmission line extending radially outward. 0 1 n modes of the ring resonator by !R;!R; :::; !R; ::: and particular geometry, each of the twelve qubits is coupled the qubit frequencies are chosen between the first two to nine other qubits (Fig. 1(c)). Further, the inter-qubit modes of the ring resonator. coupling is a slowly varying function of qubit frequency We compute the inter-qubit coupling Jij (see Appendix around! ~Q and thus allows us enough flexibility in the A for details) and plot it as a function of inter-qubit an- choice of qubit frequencies with a nominal variation in the gle and qubit frequencies !Q in Fig. 2(b). We observe inter-qubit coupling (less than ±10% in a range of ±100 that the inter-qubit coupling is reasonably flat except MHz; the region highlighted in yellow in Fig. 2(c)). near angles 120o and 240o and frequencies close to the resonant modes of the ring resonator. If we choose 30o angular spacing between qubits and operate around fre- III. EXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATION OF 0 1 INTER-QUBIT COUPLING quency! ~Q = !R + !R =2, connected pairs have only two different values of finite coupling. The vertical line cuts in Fig. 2(b) are separately plotted in Fig. 2(c) In our experiment, we use the 3D circuit QED archi- to highlight the coupling as a function of qubit frequen- tecture consisting of a central circular bus resonator real- cies for these angles. Qubit pairs placed at 60o, 180o ized in rectangular coax geometry with twelve slots dis- and 300o show a maximum value of coupling while those tributed along its perimeter at 30o angular spacing where o o o o o o placed at 30 , 90 , 150 , 210 ,p 270 and 330 show a cou- the qubit chips can be placed. The symmetry of the de- pling reduced by a factor of 2 compared to the maxi- sign ensures that only four qubits are sufficient to explore mum value. However, the qubits placed at 120o and 240o all six possible combinations of inter-qubit angles in this show zero coupling at this special frequency! ~Q due to design. These four qubits are placed at positions 1, 3, 9 destructive interference of the two paths connecting the and 10, as shown in Fig. 3(a) and we label them as Q1, two qubits[23]. Thus in a qubit network realized with this Q3, Q9 and Q10 respectively. The remaining qubit po- 3 B B tuned by ∆ =2π ' 250 MHz from the qubit's original (a) C g C g S transition frequency. We perform spectroscopy on one of l the qubits while varying the amplitude of the Stark shift tone to obtain the vacuum Rabi splitting spectrum of the L C C L Q1 Q1 Q2 Q2 hybridized qubits (see Fig. 3(b)). The minimum vacuum L-l Rabi splitting on each pair is measured while parking the spectator qubits at particular frequencies away from the 0 25 crossing point. Finally, we estimate the transverse cou- (b) Abs. Coupling (MHz) pling strengths Jij, that provide the best match with the 5.9 experimentally observed splittings by numerically solving the following Hamiltonian for the 4-qubit system 5.3 4 X δi H^ = = (! a^ya^ + a^ya^ (^aya^ − I)) 0 ~ i i i 2 i i i i i=1 4.7 (1) 4 X + J (^aya^ +a ^ya^ ): 4.1 ij i j j i Frequency (GHz) i<j;j=1 3.5 Here !i and δi are the transition frequency and anhar- th 0 120 240 360 monicity of the i transmon respectively and Jij is the Relative angle (Degrees) pairwise exchange coupling between ith and jth trans- (c) 10 mon.