RESETTLEMENT PLANNING DOCUMENT
September 2012
REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN:
Grant 0245-TAJ: CAREC Corridor 3 (Dushanbe- Uzbekistan Border) Improvement Project
Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (Phase 1) Addendum 3 Social Monitoring Report
Prepared by Ministry of Transport of Republic of Tajikistan for the Asian Development Bank.
Ministry of Transport Republic of Tajikistan
External Monitoring Report of the implementation of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (Phase 1) Addendum 2
CAREC Corridor 3 (Dushanbe – Uzbekistan border Road Improvement Project) ADB Grant: 0245 - TAJ (SF)
Prepared by: Urakova Zarina External Monitoring Consultant (EMC)
SEPTEMBER 2012
Page | 1
Contents
1 Abbreviations and Acronyms 3
2 Introduction 4
3 Methodology and Approach 6
4 Asset inventory, compensation and entitlements 7
5 Costs summary 8
6 Rehabilitation program for vulnerable Aps 9
7 Public consultation 9
8 Grievance cases 10
9 Conclusions 10
10 Recommendations 12
Page | 2
1 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AP Affected Person
AE Affected Entity
ADB Asian Development Bank
AIDS Acquired Immune EfficiencySyndrome
ALMGC Agency for Land Management, Geodesy and Cartography
CAREC Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation
CDF Collective Dehkan Farm
DF Dekhan Farm
DMS Detailed Measurement Survey
EA Executing Agency
FGD Focused Group Discussions
Ha Hectare
HH Household
Kg Kilogram
LAR Land Acquisition and Resettlement
LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan
LS Lump Sump
M&E Monitoring and Evaluation
MoT Ministry of Transport
NGO Non-Government Organization
PIU RR Project Implementation Unit Roads Rehabilitation
PMC Project Management Consultant
PSA Poverty and Social Assessment
RoW Right of Way
TJS Tajikistan somoni (currency) Page | 3
2 INTRODUCTION
1. This Compliance report has been prepared by an External Monitoring Consultant to assess whether the implementation of the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan, Phase 1Addendum 2 for the Dushanbe-Uzbekistan Border road (the Project) complied with the stipulations of the approved LARP and ADB Involuntary Resettlement safeguards. A satisfactory implementation of the LARP is a condition for ADB no objection to the start of physical civil works.
2. This report represents only monitoring of the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan, phase 1 Addendum 2, which was endorsed by the Government of the Republic of Tajikistan and approved by ADB in June 2012 and its immediate implementation has been carried in close colaboration of the Ministrry of Transports’ Project Implmentation Unit (PIU) with the local hukumats representatives and resettlement specialists of the Project Management Consultant (PMC). The ADB National Resettlement Specialist based at the ADB Tajikistan resident mission also observed the compensation payment process in the field. Internal monitoring of the Addendum 2 LARP 1 implementation has been started by end of June and completed 10th of August 2012. Attached to this report Appendix 1 is the internal monitoring of LARP 1 Addendum 2, the content of which acknowledged by the EMC after thorough review of all supporting documents and consultations with APs and other stakeholders at different levels.
3. This report covers information on additional impact on APs caused by the project based on finalized design of road section A (6.46 km of four-lane road) in Rudaki and Gisar districts and parcially road section D (6 km two-lane road) in Tursunzoda district. Table 1 provides information on road sections locations and lengths.
Table 1: Road Sections under LARP Phase 1 Road Section Kilometer Length (km) Included in From To addendum 2 A 7+540 14+000 6.46 A - 6.46 km B 17+060 21+500 4.44 C 26+500 34+000 7.5 D 43+800 61+550 17.75 D - 6 - km Total 36.15 4. The External Monitoring Consultant has prepared this Compliance Report based on the following parameters and objectives: i. Verification that all APs have been compensated in the amounts stipulated in the Addendum 2 LARP 1 document; ii. Assessment of the accuracy of survey and asset valuation; iii. Assessment of the effectiveness and thoroughness of the legalization/re- registration process; iv. Assessment of the rehabilitation program for severely affected and vulnerable APs; v. Review of complaint and grievance cases and of their solution vi. Assessment of the satisfaction of the APs vii. Lesson learned to be applied to the next projects, and; viii. General assessment of Addendum 2 LARP 1 implementation and recommendations to ADB regarding provision of No Objection Letter to start the civil works; Page | 4
5. Impact Summary. Based on detailed design, 264 persons, comprising 34 affected households have been identified in different locations of Rudaki, Gisar and Tursunzoda districts who were not listed in the LARP 1.A summary of impacts provided in table 2. Based on the information from table 2, 23 APs lose 3.03 ha of agrucultural lands of annual crops, orchards and vineyards, 9 households lose 2,283 sq. meter of residential/commercial lands. Some miner technical mistakes occurred during preparation of Addendum 2 of LARP 1 preparation, which were corrected and implemented according to the actual situation. Further the report will bring detale explanation of the actual impact volumes and implementation.
Table 2: Addendum 2 of LARP 1Impact Summary Identifiedand Actual
Impact on land, structure, trees and facilities Unit Planned Actual Affected households’ agricultural land and orchards Number 23 23 Affected area of households’ agricultural land and Sqm 30299.5 30299.5 orchards Average % of the affected land area against total land % 0.36% 0.36% holding Affected fruit trees on agricultural land Number 408 408 Affected households’ residential / commercial land Number 7 9 Affected area of residential / commercial land Sqm 2238 2283 Affected fruit trees on residential / commercial land Number 16 18 Affected buildings Number 1 2 Outbuildings (toilets, barns, cattle barns, etc.) m 105 130 Affected walls, fences and other miscellaneous items Number 12 13 Concrete wall m 31.55 33.6 Cement blocks wall m 17.5 17.5 Wire netting fences Sqm 40 94.6 Concrete surfaces m 53.1 53.1 Severely Affected Households Number - - Number of Households to be relocated Number - - Vulnerable Affected Households Number 2 2 Total Affected Households Number 34 34 Total Affected Persons Number 264 264
6. Compensation entitlements planned and amounts delivered. Scale of LAR impact on these newly identified 34 households has been measured and their enttlements were validated based on the matrix used for the LARP phase 1. A few differences in calculations were identified and necessary corrections were made before delivering of the compensations to APs. Accordingly APs acceptance of these these small changes based on the actual situation and proves have been achieved. Following the entitlements defined in the LARP phase 1 Addendum 2 compensation matrix, APs were delivered with compensation quantities/amounts commensurate to the amounts and unit rates detailed in the approved LARP 1 Addendum 2. Amount of 292,391.30 TJS was paid to APs, as compensation and allowances against their losses.
7. Public Consultation. Group and individual consultations with the affected persons and other stakeholders (community leaders, jamoat and district hukumat representatives) have been conducted at different stages of the Addendum 2 LARP 1 implementation. APs used their rights to discuss and submit their grievance applications on disagreements on evaluation of affected assets and or any other issues and suggestions about the project. Overall one group and two individual written complaints were registered and all issues were solved at jamoat level.External Monitoring Team conducted round of consultation and meetings with Page | 5
individual APs and groups, jamoat representatives and other project stakeholders from 29th of August to 8th September 2012 to gauge level of APs satisfaction.
8. Assessment on Compleance. LARP was implemented in a manner that all potential adverse impact on APs land, buildings, income sources and other assets have been fairly compensated to achieve APs satisfaction.Valuation methods, entitlements matrix used for the LARP phase 1 has been applied during addendum 2 preparation and implementation. LARP implementation complied with the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement requirements for involuntary resettlement and the principles adopted for the project, in terms of provision of compensation and impact validation. All compensations, assistance and benefits adopted in the proposed entitlements matrix, corresponded to the APs received benefits that they were entitled for.
3 METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH
9. The External Monitoring Consultant has prepared this Compliance Report based on the following parameters and objectives: ix. Verification that all APs have been compensated in the amounts stipulated in the Addendum 2 LARP 1 document; x. Assessment of the accuracy of survey and asset valuation; xi. Assessment of the effectiveness and thoroughness of the legalization/re- registration process; xii. Assessment of the rehabilitation program for severely affected and vulnerable APs; xiii. Review of complaint and grievance cases and of their solution xiv. Assessment of the satisfaction of the APs xv. Lesson learned to be applied to the next projects, and; xvi. General assessment of Addendum 2 LARP 1 implementation and recommendations to ADB regarding provision of No Objection Letter to start the civil works;
10. The above work entailed a thorough review of all documents used for LARP 1 Addendum 2 preparation and implementation. This included a systematic comparison of the impacts survey records with the compensation tallies. Information was obtained from district authorities and PIU RR and PMC resettlement specialists on 27th August to 5th September 2012. In addition, direct fieldwork and individual or group interviews with the APs were carried from 29 August to 8 September 2012, to evaluate resettlement implementation, AP participation in decision-making and the provision modalities of compensations and allowances to APs.
11. To gauge the satisfaction of the APs, the 3-page questionnaire was used to interview 44% of the APs to obtain quantitative and qualitative information on entitlement delivery, efficiency, impact and sustainability and review level of APs satisfaction. See Attachment 3 of this report. The selection of the interviewees took in consideration impact type, gender and vulnerability status, as detailed in table 3 below. Table 3: APs with different types of impact interviewed
APs by category Total AP No. Number interviewed Percentage All APs interviewed 34 12 34% Impact on Agricultural land 23 8 33%
Page | 6
APs by category Total AP No. Number interviewed Percentage Impact on Residential land 9 4 44% Vulnerable APs 2 1 50% Severely affected APs - - -% Women headed HHs 5 2 40%
12. Discussions were organized with the PMC and PIU resettlement specialists individually and joint group discussions with APs at jamoat level involving APs, local government and, community leaders were also carried out to elicit information about performance in various resettlement activities. Individual APs were also interviewed for obtaining more detail information and understandings of individual perceptions on the project in September 2012.
13. Review and analysis of all Addendum 2 LARP 1 relevant documents, informational reports such as Addendum 2 LARP 1 document approved by GoT and ADB in June, Internal Monitoring Report of Addendum 2 LARP 1 submitted by PMC in August and data analysis provided by local authorities, PIU RR, PMC on asset registration and valuation methods, type of impacts and etc.
4 ASSET INVENTORY, COMPENSATION AND ENTITLEMENTS
14. Agricultural land inventory and compensation entitlements. In total 30,299.5 sq. meters of agricultural lands of annual and perennial crops was affected by the Addendum 2 in addition to the LARP phase 1 impact. Affected agricultural land belong to 21 individuals and or families and 2 collectives. Total area of agricultural land affected by entire LARP phase 1 and Addendum 2 is 49,424.5 sq. meter (4.94 ha), which represents less than 1% of existing lands of AEs. Information is obtained from PMC resettlement specialist documentations on types and level of additional impacts on APs.
15. Compensation payments. AEs received compensations for the loss of land use rights for 5 years based on yearly gross income of affected land of annual crops and yearly gross income of land with perennial crops. Information gathered from different sources such as district relevant authorities, PMC, PIU RR and bank reciepts and APs statements confirmed that APs received 85,476.75 TJSfor the loss of agricultural land use rights. According to the compensation entitlement matrix, APs also received one year gross income of annual crops of amount of 7,818.35 TJSand for the loss of income of perennial crops amount of 112,490 TJSannual income of perennial crops multiplied by number of years to regrow a tree based on each tree type. The same amountsare stipulated in the Adendum 2 LARP 1 document endorced by the Government of Tajikistan and in the internal monitoring report. External monitoring consultant confirms recieval of these amounts by APs from the gathered documents such as Written and signed statements of APs after they received compansations and bank checks copies, these inforamtion also provided in Appendinx 5 of this report. For more information see Appendix 1 (internal monitoring report).
16. 3 APs who grow fruit trees on their residential lands also were compensated in amount of 5,320 TJS for the loss of 18 different types of fruit trees.
17. Residential / commercial lands inventory and compensations. 9 parcels 2,283 sq. meter of of residential and commercial lands affected and APs were compensated in cash for the affected land. As the affected land represent less than 30% of the total APs land holding, none of them received replacement plot for their lands and have enough space to rebuild their Page | 7
outbuildings and boundery walls. For more information see Appendix 1 (internal monitoring report).
18. LARP Addendum 2 has affected two outbuildings of an AP in Rudaki district and 11 different types of walls, fences and concrete surfaces in Rudaki and Gisar districts. Overall volume of affected outbuildings is 130 m3, walls and fencesvolume is 146 m3and volume of concrete surfaces is 53 m3. Overall 55,249.43 TJS was paid to APs for their buildings and walls. No any grievance registered and no issue of underestimation or underpayment was raised by the APs.
19. Allowances. Acording to the LARP compensation policy the severely impacted households are either those who will be relocated or those that will lose more than 10% of their income source. No any case of severe impact was identified. Only two APs found to be vulnerable as their livelihoods considered below poverty line. Each of these APs received 462 TJS of vulnerability allowance.
5 COSTS SUMMARY
20. The compensation and other related resettlement costs due to LARP I Addendum 2 was budgeted to TJS 307,419 including 2% of contingency to cover costs for complaints. Direct cost of the addendum 2 is 292,391.35 TJS, where 100% of this amount was paid to APs as compensation and allowance against their losses (See table 4).
Table 4: Addendum 2 Compensation Budget Total Total Item estimated expenses (TJS) (TJS) 1. Rehabilitation Assistance for Loss of Land Use Right a. Cash Allowance ▪ Agricultural Land 85,476.8 85,476.8 ▪ Residential / Commercial Land 24,618.0 25,113.0 2. Compensation for Structure Losses a. Buildings 5,951.0 8,022 b. Walls and Fences 24,191.0 21,385 c. Other structures (concrete surfaces) 25,842.2 25,842.2 3. Compensation for Crop/Tree Losses a. Annual crops 7,818.35 7,818.35 b. Perennial crops/fruit trees 112,490 112,490 c. Fruit trees at households' plots 5,080.0 5,320.0 4. Allowances Allowance for Vulnerable APs 924.0 924.0 Total compensation costs 292,391.35 292,391.35 5. Support Costs (lump sum) 9,000 0 Total 301,392 292,391.35 6. Contingency 2% on total 6,027.8 0 Grand Total 307,419 292,391.35
Page | 8
6 REHABILITATION PROGRAM FOR VULNERABLE APS
21. Out of 34 affected entities two households considered as vulnerable. Dakhiev Haqdod from Rudaki district who mainly does daily waged labour to end family needs. His two sons have been employed by the project and are doing unskilled labour. Each of them receive from 400 to 700 TJS per month depend on type of work they do on daily bases. Dakhiev Haqdod is a person whoes two outbuildings were affected and he received fair compensation for these buildings. Second vulnerable AP is Kokilov Qurbonnazar from Tursunzoda district, whoes very nerrow parcel of individual dehkan farm was affected. His main livelihood activity is agriculture hence did not apply for labour work for the project. It has been ensured that agricultural lands of people do not suffer from the project. All irrigation and drainage chanals re-established on time and people could irrigate their lands on needy times. So far no any other long term rehabilitation project has been undertaken by the government and other social organizations. There would be opportunities for different types of income generating activities after construction activities.
7 PUBLIC CONSULTATON
22. According to the information provided by local jamoat authorities and minutes of the consultation meetings with APs round of consultation meetings were conducted from 18 to 21 May 2012. Another round of consultation meetings were conducted with APs before provision of payments in July. Affected people were consulted during addendum 2 preparation and implementation and information is disclosed to them in accessible form, manner and language. Accountability mechanism was set up to provide a platform where APs could express their grievances, seek solutions and report on alleged violations of the adapted policies established for the implementation of LARP phase 1 addendum 2. Within each project district, APs had proper access to and bring their issues on the table with a special grievance form available at GRC representative offices in each jamoat.
23. Consultations with government authorities at district and jamoat level were conducted where discussions were held about issues or constrains raised by APs after completion of payments on LARP 1 Addendum 2.Jamoats’ relevant representatives are available at any time to accept APs complaints or concerns about the project and communicate issues with the resettlement specialists. Joint meetings and discussion organized by jamoat representatives to discuss different issues raised by APs. Minutes of such meetings and consultations are available in jamoat offices. People concerns were mainly access to the new road from their streets and houses, where it was explained that all existing accesses to the project road will be established and bettered in terms of safety and aesthetics.
24. Discussion with the PIU and PMC resettlement specialist showed that LAR 1 Addendum 2 planning and implementation was done in a very proficient and accurate manner. All relevant information, data and evidences of the Addendum 2 LAR phase 1 planning and implementation is in place. Safeguard plans are disclosed to the public and information is updated at various stages of the project cycle.Roles and Responsibilities have been followed by undertaking required social assessments, carrying out consultations with affected people and communities during preparation and implementation of the project, and internal monitoring of the work was ensured. See Attachment 2 for list of people communicated and interviewed.
Page | 9
8 GRIEVANCE CASES
25. It is confirmed by heads of jamoats and PIU RR resettlement specialists that all grievance cases and complaints on land acquisition compensation and resettlement registered properly and addressed on time and APs satisfaction achieved. Sample of such documents are available at jamoat and PIU RR offices. In the process of compensation payments, APs were reminded that in case of disagreement they can submit grievance application within their subdistrict offices. Up to date, 3 written grievance cases were raised and registered in jamoat Somon of Gissar district regarding affected vineyards. All grievances represented only a single issue of affected vineyards. APs wanted to establish aditional access road to their fields for the access to the field by agricultural machinery. It has been discussed in the presence of APs with the chief and land committee representative of jamoat Somon that in coming autumn, beginning of cropping season farmers will be supported to replant some of the grapes trees to other parts of the land available and free land to set road for agricultural machinery. There will not be any obstackle or problem and jamoat will support and help these farmers to organize their lands better. In this way concensuss was achieved with this farmers.
26. Another concern raised by farmers in all three districts was land re-registration because of taxasion. As the project has acquired cropping land of different dehkan farms, the actual sizes of each affected entities land must be measured and based on type of use for each parcel of land all taxes and reporting procedures should be established. Farmers must not pay any type of tax, for land that has been acquired from them. State land committee and its institute ‘Fazo’ based on final designs of the project road sections will develop a report where acquired land will be deducted from APs farms land holding balance. As per the recent changes in the project design this work will be followed accordingly. Any taxes paid by APs on any type of land, which has been already acquired, are reimbursable expenses, which will be considered in the next tax payment period when the required reports and data will be provided to all State and districts relevant government authorities.
27. All grievance cases were solved in a very transparent way with participation of APs. Each individual and or groups grievances discussed in the presence of APs by the GRCs where PIU and PMC resettlement specialists also took part. In some of the discussion ADB representative – local resettlement specialist also participated.
9 CONCLUSIONS
28. Discussion with affected entities prevailed that their lands, building and other structures have been correctly enumerated and they have received compensation payments accordingly. The amounts of payments were equal to the amounts that was announced during consultation meeting organized for them to check the acuracy of assets inventory and cost calculations. Impact on income sources was significant only for a collective farm whoes orchard and vineyard was affected. However comparably this collective farm overall is losing 0.38% of its total land holding and has opportunity and available land to re plant grapes and fruit trees saplings and extend the gardens from the other sides of the lands not bordering to roads. This is possible also to other farmers to increase plots of their vineyards in Gisar distrcit.
29. The ADB Safeguard Policy Statement requirements for involuntary resettlement and the principles adopted for the project were followed. All compensations, assistance and benefits adopted in the proposed entitlements matrix, corresponded to the APs received benefits that they were entitled for. Implementation of Addendum 2 LARP 1 has adequately
Page | 10
met all requirements listed in the LARP 1 document that was adopted for addendum 2, which were approved by the Government of Tajikistan and ADB.
30. Addendum 2 of the LARP phase 1 has been implemented according to policies and procedures noted in the LARP document and the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement requirements for involuntary resettlement and the principles adopted for the project were followed. All compensations, assistance and benefits adopted in the proposed entitlements matrix, which were approved by the Government of Tajikistan and ADB, corresponded to the APs received benefits that they were entitled for. Exteral monitoring team firmly confirms complete implementation of Addendum 2 of the LARP 1 and recommends for provision of No Objection Letter for commence of civil works. Table 5 below provides information on number of APs for each different type of impact. This data elaborated from different sources such as local jamoats, PIU and PMC offices and cross check of these information corresponds to the information provided in Addendum 2 LARP 1 main document based on which implementation was complete. EMC found the same number of APs for each type of impact based on the compensation entitlement matrix adopted for the project.
Table 5: Compensation Entitlements Matrix Affected Assets Entitlements APs No. Persons An allowance for loss of land use rights in Agricultural Individual land- cash equal to 5 years of the gross income of land: All use rights the affected annual crops land at market rate 21 APs losses holder or to 1 year of gross income of affected fruit irrespective trees land at market rates. of impact An allowance for loss of land use rights in Cooperative severity cash equal to 5 years of the gross income of 2 AE land holder the affected land at market rate Provision of alternative land or rehabilitation Residential/ Residential cash allowance for loss of land use rights commercial 9 APs rights holder equal to the current land lease rates land multiplied by 25 years ($2.5 per m2) Cash compensation at replacement rate for affected structure/other fixed assets free of Houses and All relevant salvageable materials and transaction 2 APs structures APs. costs. All buildings will be compensated in their entirety Crop compensation in cash equal to 1 year Income from of the gross income of affected land at 21 APs All APs crops market rate. This shall apply whether the 2 AEs land is fallow, or under cultivation. Cash compensation for productive trees based on the net annual harvest from the Income from All APs tree(s) for the number of years taken for 3 APs trees replacement tree(s) to reach comparable production Rehabilitation/substitution in kind or cash at Communal/ replacement cost of affected items and 1 Public assets rehabilitation of their functions
Page | 11
Affected Assets Entitlements APs No. Persons APs below Employment priority in Project-related jobs 1 AP poverty line, Vulnerable households Cash contribution equal to 2 month’s official APs 2 APs headed by minimum salary. women
10 RECOMMENDATIONS
31. Wheneverpending resettlement issue is identified (in case of change in design and additional land requirement)a contructor must not start construction work, unless people receive compensations for their affected lands, structures, etc. Before starting any construction activity in any new section of the project road, contractor has to be sure of that LARP related issues were solved and people with affected assets and structures have been compensated and there is no any other pending issue prevail. Without getting confirmation from PMCto commence the construction work there should not be any activity going on at any new road section.
32. As it has been observed, there are many structures, boundry walls and buidlings made of mud material mainly and without fundament with many cracks and partial destruction. Compensations have been paid for those structures affected by land acquisition and resettlement plan. But there are other similar structures which will not be affected by the resettlement but may collapse during construction work. A pre-construction survey on property condition should be conducted to record with photos all buildings and structures within the area that could be affected by vibration and other impacts of heavy machinery. It would assist to explore the volume of damages caused by construction works and resolving of compensation claims arising from communities.
33. Some very miner technical mistake that were identified and corrected during implementation and mentioned in the internam monitoring report. Full and thorough review of LARP documents is recommended, before sending them for approval.
34. Land re-registration remains one of the main issues raised by APs. People concern is mainly based on land taxation as now people are not using part of their lands which have been acquired, but still paying taxes for the affected land. It is known that State Land Committee and institute ‘Fazo’ have to record and re-register lands, which have been acquired by the project base on final design. It is recommended to provide last updated information of the project to relevant institutions in order to start re-registration of lands. Any taxes paid by APs on land, which has been already acquired, should be considred in future land taxation.
Page | 12
Appendix 1
Ministry of Transport Republic of Tajikistan
Internal Monitoring Report of the implementation of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (Phase 1) Addendum 2
CAREC Corridor 3 (Dushanbe – Uzbekistan border Road Improvement Project) ADB Grant: 0245 - TAJ (SF)
AUGUST 2012 Contents
1 Introduction 3
2 Asset inventory, compensation and entitlements 4
2.1 Agricultural land inventory 4
2.2 Agricultural land-use rights compensation costs. 4
2.3 Residential / commercial lands inventory and compensations. 5
2.4 Compensations for annual crop losses 6
2.5 Compensation for perennial crops 6
2.6 Impact on APs structure and buildings 7
2.7 Allowances 8
3 Costs summary 8
4 Public consultations and grievance cases 9
5 Conclusions 11
6 Recommendations 12
1 INTRODUCTION
1. This report represents internal monitoring of the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan, phase 1 Addendum 2 (LARP 1) for the Dushanbe – Uzbekistan border Road Improvement Project. Implementation and monitoring of the LARP phase 1 including its addendum 1, which identified 4 affected additional households, has been carried in June to September 2011. This was confirmed in an external monitoring report submitted to ADB in October 2011. Addendum 2 of the LARP 1 was endorsed by the Government of the Republic of Tajikistan and approved by ADB in June 2012, where after its immediate implementation has been carried in close colaboration of the Ministrry of Transports’ Project Implmentation Unit (PIU) with the local hukumats representatives and resettlement specialists of the Project Management Consultant (PMC). The ADB National Resettlement Specialist based at the ADB Tajikistan resident mission also observed the compensation payment process in the field. 2. Addendum 2 of the LARP (phase 1) covers 6.46 km of road Section A and 6 km of Section D, where detailed design has been completed. Based on final design additional impacts on households’ agricultural and residential lands, structures and boundery walls and fenses have been identified. It coveres Rudaki, Gisar and Tursunzoda districts. 3. In some locations within sections A and D where there were additional impact on people lands, contractor started construction work, without provision of compensations to APs. Discussion with Contractor and Client resettlement speciaslit showed not intentional escape from payments of compansations but lack of understanding of ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement requirements for involuntary resettlement. An agreement was made with APs that they will receive compensation for their affected assets during implementation of LARP phase 2. ADB Mission in May 2012 was informed about these additional impact and their recommendation was to stop construction work in the project area where there is an additional impact, imposed by finalised design. Table 1: Road Sections under LARP Phase 1 Road Section Kilometer Length (km) Included in From To addendum 2 A 7+540 14+000 6.46 A B 17+060 21+500 4.44 C 26+500 34+000 7.5 D 43+800 61+550 17.75 D-partial Total 36.15 4. In order to allow for a phased-implementation of civil works of the Project while detailed desgin in the remaining section of (B, C and part of D) is being finalized, it has been agreed that 2 addendums should be prepared for LARP 1, Addendum 2 that covers section A and D and addendum 3 for sections B, C and D parcially. At this stage addendum 2 has been implemented and all information on additional impact of road section B, C and D has been collected and road sections with additional impact has been identified. Civil works are not allowed in the locations where there is still pending land acquisition. 5. Based on detailed design, 264 persons, comprising 34 affected households have been identified in different locations of Rudaki, Gisar and Tursunzoda districts who were not listed in the LARP 1. Scale of LAR impact on these newly identified 34 households has been measured and their enttlements were validated based on the matrix used for the LARP phase 1. Following the entitlements defined in the LARP phase 1 Addendum 2 compensation matrix, APs were delivered with compensation quantities/amounts commensurate to the amounts and unit rates detailed in the approved LARP 1 Addendum 2. Amount of 292,391.30 TJS was paid to APs, as compensation and allowances against their losses. 6. LARP was implemented in a manner that all potential adverse impact on APs land, buildings, income sources and other assets have been fairly compensated to achieve APs satisfaction. Valuation methods, entitlements matrix used for the LARP phase 1 has been applied during addendum 2 preparation and implementation. LARP implementation complied with the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement requirements for involuntary resettlement and the principles adopted for the project, in terms of provision of compensation and impact validation. All compensations, assistance and benefits adopted in the proposed entitlements matrix, corresponded to the APs received benefits that they were entitled for. 2 ASSET INVENTORY, COMPENSATION AND ENTITLEMENTS
2.1 Agricultural land inventory 7. A combined area of 30,299.5 sq. meters (3.03 ha) of crops and fruit bearing agriculturl lands of 23 households have been affected. In total there are 30 agricultural plots with different type of crops, orchards and vineyards belonging to 2 Collective and 21 Individual landholders, have been affected. 3 households already have lost 1.9 ha of their lands but however none of the APs has been severely afected. Combined affected land in the initial land acquisition with the additional land acquisition under addendum 2 represents less than 1% of the total land holding. Table 2: Agricultural land losses Affected land as per LARP 1 Affected land as per Total area of % of Type of Addendum 2 implementation agricultural affected Cultivation Plots APs Plots APs land (ha) Area (m2) Area (m2) land No. No. No. No. Annual 318.51 14,729.5 18 18 14,729.5 18 18 0.46% Crops Orchard 405 14,720.0 4 2 14,720.0 4 2 0.36% Vineyard 108.62 1,945.0 8 8 1,945.0 8 8 0.18% Total 832.13 31,394.5 30 28 31,394.5 30 28 0.38%
8. Cropping area is bigger than the actual land size because some landholders produce more than one crop per year. It has been verified that affected land area including impact on land by LARP 1 is 49,424.5 sq. meter (nearly 5 ha land), which composes 0.59% of the total agricultural land holding of the APs.
2.2 Agricultural land-use rights compensation costs.
9. APs losing their rights on the use of agricultural lands received compensation for 5 years of yearly gross income of affected land with annual crops at existing market rate and 1 year of yearly gross income of affected land with fruit trees, which corresponds to the compensation entitlement matrix adopted for the project. Tables 3 below compares the planned and the actual compensation payments for the loss of use rights on agricultural lands.
Table 3: Compensation for the loss of land use rights for agricultural land with annual crops, vineyards and orchards No. No. Affected Planned Actual Road Type of Districts of of area of Compensation payment in Section cultivation Plots APs land m2 in TJS TJS Rudaki 1 1 2,398.5 3,597.75 3,597.75 A Annual Gisar Corps 5 3 1,561.0 2,581.5 2,581.5 Lands D Tursunzod 12 12 10,770.0 32,912.5 32,912.5 Total annual crops 18 16 14,729.5 39,091.75 39,091.75 Orchards 4 1 36,885 36,885 36,885 A Gisar Vineyards 8 6 9,500 9,500 9,500 Total orchards and vineyeards 12 7 16,665 46,385 46,385
Grand total 30 23 31,394.5 85,476.75 85,476.75
10. Compensation payments to APs with loss of use rights on agricultural and perennial crops lands have been provided as per the estimations given in LARP 1 Addendum 2 document. Interviewed APs confirmed that have received compensation amounts stipulated in the documents that they have signed for receiving payments. Total compensation for the loss of use-rights on agricultural land is computed at 85,476.75 TJS and the same amount was received by 23 APs losing agricultural land.
2.3 Residential / commercial lands inventory and compensations for the loss of land use rights.
11. Overall, nine parcels of six residential and three commercial lands, of an area of 2,283 sq. meter (0.22 ha), are affected in Rudaki and Gisar districts. There is no impact on residential and commercial land in Tursunzoda. Very narrow strip of residential land is affected compare to total land holding of the APs that did not cause any relocation need and/or case of severity of impact. Interviewed APs confirmed that have received amount of compensations as per the documents, which we had presented to them. Residential / commercial lands have been compensated according to the policy adopted for the project. Table 4: Residential / Commercial land use rights compensations
As per plan in Addendum 2 Actual implementation Category of No. No. AP Affected Unit Rate Compensation Affected Compensation of of area (m2) (TJS/m2) in TJS area (m2) in TJS HHs HHs AP with marginal land loss and with 7 2,238.00 11 24,618.00 9 2,283.00 25,113.00 sufficient land to rebuild
12. Table 4 above provides information on affected residential and commercial lands of APs that is tackled by the project and amount of compensations that were provided to them. The information is elaborated for Rudaki and Gisar districts where there is additional impact on residential and commercial lands compared to Addendum 2 data. 45 sq. meters of lands of APs were missed during data analysis but during consultations and payments this mistake was corrected but the data tables were not updated with the refined information.
2.4 Compensations for annual crop losses
13. The agreed agricultural production valuation mechanism for the Project was based on cash compensation only and on an assessment of the products of the affected plots. Compensations for the losses of annual crops were paid in cash at prevailing market rate based on year’s yield. Table below provides information on planned and actual payments of compensations for annual crops. On this basis, compensation for income losses from annual crops is computed at 7,818.35 TJS for 18 farmers for their affected crops. Collected documents, receipts and farmers statements prove that they have received compensations for income from crops. Table 5: Annual crops compensation costs. Affected Actual Roa agricultu Value of Compens payments d Type Cultivated re 1 kg of a tion provided for District Secti of crop area (m²) producti products amount each type of on on (in (in TJS) (in TJS) crop kg) (in TJS) A Rudaki Lucerne 2,398.5 2,398.5 0.3 719.55 719.55 Wheat 320.0 144.0 1.0 144.0 144.0 A Gisar Lucerne 1,241.0 1,241.0 0.3 372.30 372.30 Wheat 9,650.0 4,342.5 1.0 4,342.5 4,342.5 D Tursunzod Onions 1,120.0 2,240.0 1.0 2,240 2,240 Total 14,729.5 10,366.0 7,818.35 7,818.35
2.5 Compensation for perennial crops 14. Fruit trees planted in orchards/vineyards was also affected. A total of 408 fruit trees (grapes, cherry, apple and plum) located on the affected orchards and vineyards were identified. Eighteen fruit trees (apple, small cherry, peach, pomegranate and grapes) were also identified on the affected portions of residential plots. 15. Compensation for fruit trees and vines losses were calculated based on annual volume of production of the tree multiplied by the number of years to re-grow the tree to productive stage and value of product at market price. Compensation for loss of income from fruit trees planted on agricultural land is estimated at 112,490.00 TJS (Table 6).
Table 6: Compensation for fruit trees loss on agricultural land As per LARP 1 Addendum 2 Actual Implementation Tree Total No of Current Number of Estimated Annual Compensatio Type producti price per years to compensati No of fruit n amounts trees on kg kg re-grow a on volume trees producti received by (in TJS) tree TJS on kg APs / TJS Grapes 76 1,900 5 4 38,000 76 1,900 38,000 Cherry 253 6,325 5 2 57,000 253 6,325 57,000 Apple 6 240 3 3 2,160 6 240 2,160 Plum 73 2,555 3 2 15,330 73 2,555 15,330 Total 408 11,020 112,490.0 408 11,020 112,490.00
16. APs received fully compensation estimated for the loss of income from trees on agricultural lands. Market value of products and number of years that was used for provision of compensations for trees corresponds to the data in approved original LARP 1 and the Addendum 2. Table 7: Compensation for fruit trees grown on residential lands As per LARP 1 Addendum 2 Actual Ave. Number Compensation Num Current Total Type of fruit fruit of years provided to ber price compen Number trees productio to APs (in TJS) of per kg sation of trees n per tree re-grow trees (in TJS) (in TJS) (in kg) a tree Apple 3 40 3 3 1,080 3 1,080 Small cherry 5 20 3 2 600 7 840 Peach 4 25 5 2 1,000 4 1,000 Nut tree 1 50 6 4 1,200 1 1,200 Pomegranate 2 25 6 2 600 2 600 Grapes 1 50 3 4 600 1 600 Total 16 5,080 18 5,320
17. APs were compensated for their fruit trees grown in their residential lands. As per the data from table there is an increase on amount of actual compensation payments received by APs. This increase is because of an AP whose 2 small cherry trees was missed out and included in the list after his oral complaint and conformation visit. Hence 5,320 TJS was paid to 3 APs losing 18 different types of fruit trees on their residential / commercial lands.
2.6 Impact on APs structure and buildings
18. LARP Addendum 2 has affected two outbuildings of an AP in Rudaki district and 11 different types of walls, fences and concrete surfaces in Rudaki and Gisar districts. Overall volume of affected outbuildings is 130 m3 , walls and fences volume is 146 m3 and concrete surfaces is 53 m3, which is different than it was estimated. Payments for the compensation of affected structures took place according to the real situation for each AP losing building and structures.
Table 8: Buildings and walls compensation costs planned and actual payments As per LARP Addendum 2 Actual payments Type of building, wall Estimated Provided 3 Volume and structures No. Volume (m ) compensation No. 3 compensation (m ) (in TJS) (in TJS) Outbuilding (barn) 1 105.00 5,951.08 2 130 8,022.08 Concrete wall 6 31.55 15,354.44 6 33.6 16,356.86 Cement blocks wall 1 17.50 8,516.73 1 17.5 4,278.75 Wire netting fence 1 40.00 320.00 2 94.6 749.54 Concrete surfaces 2 53.10 25,842.20 2 53.1 25,842.2 Total 11 247.15 55,984.42 13 329.1 55,249.43 19. Actual amount of compensations provided to APs is lower than planned in the LARP Addendum 2 document. Data in the table above displays increased number of affected structures, increased volume but reduced payment. It is mainly because of lately identified (after submission of addendum 2) mistake in the cost calculation for the cement blocks wall of an AP in Rudaki district. As it is seen in the table 17.5 cubic meters cement blocks wall was estimated for 8,516.73 TJS, which is 486.67 TJS per 1 cubic meter of the wall that is the unit cost for concrete wall. But cement blocks wall value is 244.5 TJS per 1 cubic meter. Additional mud wall building and wire netting fence are compensated, which will be affected when construction work starts in these areas. Overall 55,249.43 TJS was paid to APs for their buildings and walls. No any grievance registered and no issue of underestimation or underpayment was raised by the APs. 2.7 Allowances 20. Acording to the LARP compensation policy the severely impacted households are either those who will be relocated or those that will lose more than 10% of their income source. A severe impact allowance was not paid to any AP because there is no any case of severity impact as it has been crosschecked.
Table 9: Vulnerability Allowances Targeted number of APs Actual payments provided Rehabilitation Planned Eligible Actual No. of APs Rehabilitation allowance (TJS) households Eligible for payment allowance (TJS) Rate Total 2 Vulnerable Aps 462 924 2 924
21. Allowance of 462 TJS (2 months of the minimum salary) was paid to two APs as their livelihood situation was regarded below poverty line. Information on provided allowances is given in table 9.
3 COSTS SUMMARY 22. The compensation and other related resettlement costs due to LARP I Addendum 2 was budgeted to TJS 307,419 including 2% of contingency to cover costs for complaints. Direct cost of the addendum 2 is 292,391.35 TJS, where 100% this amount was paid to APs as compensation and allowance against their losses.
Table 10: Addendum 2 Compensation Budget Total Total Item estimated expenses (TJS) (TJS) 1. Rehabilitation Assistance for Loss of Land Use Right a. Cash Allowance ▪ Agricultural Land 85,476.8 85,476.8 ▪ Residential / Commercial Land 24,618.0 25,113.0 2. Compensation for Structure Losses a. Buildings 5,951.0 8,022 b. Walls and Fences 24,191.0 21,385 c. Other structures (concrete surfaces) 25,842.2 25,842.2 3. Compensation for Crop/Tree Losses a. annual crops 7,818.35 7,818.35 b. perennial crops/fruit trees 112,490 112,490 c. fruit trees at households' plots 5,080.0 5,320.0 4. Allowances Allowance for Vulnerable APs 924.0 924.0 Total compensation costs 292,391.35 292,391.35
5. Support Costs (lump sum) 9,000 0 Total 301,392 292,391.35 6. Contingency 2% on total 6,027.8 0 Grand Total 307,419 292,391.35
4 PUBLIC CONSULTATON AND GRIEVANCE CASES 23. Affected people are consulted during addendum 2 preparation and implementation and information is disclosed in a form, manner and language accessible to them. Accountability mechanism was set to provide a platform where APs could express their grievances, seek solutions and report on alleged violations of the adapted policies established for the implementation of LARP phase 1 addendum 2. Within each project district, APs had proper access to and bring their issues on the table with a special grievance form available at GRC representative offices in each jamoat. 24. Consultations with government authorities at district and jamoat level were conducted where discussions were held about any issues or constrains raised by APs after completion of payments on LARP 1 Addendum 2. 25. All grievance cases and complaints on land acquisition compensation and resettlement addressed on time and APs satisfaction achieved. In the process of compensation payments, APs were reminded that in case of disagreement they can submit grievance application within their subdistrict offices. Up to date, 3 written grievance cases were raised and registered in jamoat Somon of Gisar regarding affected vineyards of the APs and consensus was achieved with these farmers. All grievance cases were solved in a very transparent way in participation of APs.
Table 11: Analysis of APs responses during individual interviews Total number of APs 34 100% Number of APs interviewed 15 34 44% Vulnerable APs interviewed 1 2 50% APs with severe impact 0 0 0% APs/Female headed HH 3 5 60% APs losing residential / commercial land 4 9 44% Types of ownership of agricultural lands Individual DF 9 21 43% Collective DF 1 2 50% Did you receive compensation for your affected assets? Yes 15 100% No 0 0% Were your damaged assets enumerated realistically? Yes 15 100% No 0 0% Was there any deduction from the approved payments? Yes 0 0% No 15 100% Was the affected land area correctly enumerated? Yes 10 100% No 0 0% Did you receive income loss compensation Yes 10 100% No 0 0% Did you receive use rights loss allowance? Yes 10 100% No 0 0% Did you receive compensation for fruit trees? Yes 12 100% No 0 0% APs self assessment of the impact on agricultural lands Seriously affected Yes 11 10% Moderately affected Yes 3 30% Minor Yes 6 60% Did you receive compensation for your affected residential land? Yes 4 100% No 0 0% Were your buildings, walls and other structures compensation Yes 4 100% estimated correctly? No 0 0% APs self assessment of the impact on agricultural lands Seriously affected Yes 0 0% Moderately affected Yes 1 25% Minor Yes 3 75% Have your income source been affected by the resettlement? Yes 10 67% No 5 33% Are you aware of your own compensation entitlements? Yes 15 100% No 0 0% Were your compensation payments sufficient to replace affected Yes 15 100% assets? No 0 0%
26. Table 11 above is summary of individual interviews carried out with APs. Out of 34 affected entities 15 (44%) have been interviewed and their affected assets have been measured. 9 individual and 1 collective agricultural land holders (67% of the interviewed affected entities) reported that their income source have been affected out of which 10 % (the collective farms, who has lost orchard and vineyard plots) levelled the impact as seriously, 30% assumed that impact on them is moderate and remaining 60% said the impact on them is minor. All interviewed affected entities reported have received compensations fully. They were aware of the volume of losses and compensation amounts that they will receive. 60% of women headed, 50% of vulnerable households have been interviewed. 44% of APs losing residential land and 43% of APs losing agricultural land have been visited and interviewed. Interviewed APs perceptions about the project were positive.
5 CONCLUSIONS 27. The addendum 2 of LARP phase 1 implementation is complete and satisfactory. Majority of affected entities have lost their parcels of agricultural lands cropped by annual crops and planted with fruit trees and vineyards. Some AP have lost their buildings, structures of different kind and trees on their households’ plots. Impact on income sources was significant only for a collective farm whoes orchard and vineyard was affected. However comparably this collective farm overall is losing 0.38% of its total land holding and has opportunity and available land to re plant grapes and fruit trees saplings and extend the gardens from the other sides of the lands not bordering to roads. This is possible also to other farmers to increase plots of their vineyards in Gisar distrcit. 28. Discussion with affected entities prevailed that their lands, building and other structures have been correctly enumerated and they have received compensation payments. The amounts of payments were equal to the amounts that they were aware from the consultation meeting organized for them to check the acuracy of assets inventory and cost calculations of the same. 29. The ADB Safeguard Policy Statement requirements for involuntary resettlement and the principles adopted for the project were followed. All compensations, assistance and benefits adopted in the proposed entitlements matrix, corresponded to the APs received benefits that they were entitled for. Implementation of Addendum 2 LARP 1 has adequately met all requirements listed in the LARP 1 document that was adopted for addendum 2, which were approved by the Government of Tajikistan and ADB. Table bellow provides information on status of LAR activities progress.
Table 12: Monitoring Indicators listed in the report and progress LAR Activities Progress Remarks Pre Construction Activities and LAR Activities 1 Assessment of resettlement impacts due Done Inventory of losses of newly to changes in Project design (If required) identified APs and APs with additional impact was carried based on the approved final road design 2 Preparation/ updating of the resettlement Done Amendment 2 of LARP 1 has plan based on changes in Project design been prepared based on the changes in the project design 3 Approval of updated LARP I by ADB Done Addendum 2 was endorsed by the Government of Tajikistan and approved by ADB in June 2012 4 Circulation of information leaflet Done Updated information leaflet was circulated among APs 5 Capacity building of LAR team in PIU/Hukumat 6 Verification of APs Census list; Done Verification of APs list was done assessment on compensation and and made necessary correction assistance, and readjustment on names and local authorities authentication was received LARP Implementation 1 Payment of compensation to APs Done All APs have received compensation payments based on Addendum 2 LARP phase 1 2 Disbursement of assistance to title Done All APs with agricultural lands holders losses were provided compensations for income and loss of land use rights 3 Disbursement of special assistance to Done 2 vulnerable APs were identified vulnerable groups and received vulnerability allowance 4 Replacement/ shifting of community Done All affected structures, walls have property resources been demolished by the owners 5 Reinstallation of public utilities Done 6 Records of Grievance Redress Done 3 Grievance cases were registered and solved
6 RECOMMENDATIONS 30. Whenever there is identified pending resettlement issue (in case of change in design and additional land requirement) contructor must not start construction work, unless people receive compensations for their affected lands, structures, etc. Before starting any construction activity in any new section of the project road, contractor has to be sure of that LARP related issues has been solved and people with affected assets and structures have been compensated and there is no any other pending issue. Without getting confirmation from PMC on commence of construction work there should not be any activity going on at any new road section. 31. As it has been observed, there are many structures, boundry walls and buidlings made of mainly mud material and without fundament with many cracks and parcial destruction. For such a structures affected by land acquisition and resettlement plan compensations are paid. But there are other similar structures which will not be affected by the resettlement but may collapse during construction work. A pre-construction survey on property condition should be conducted to record with photos all buildings and structures within the area that could be affected by vibration and other impacts of heavy machinery. It would assist in exploring volume of damages caused by construction works and resolving of compensation claims arising from communities.
Appendix 2
List of people contacted and interviewed.
No Name Position Village Jamoat District 1 Zinatov Haidar AP Shurob Somon Gisar 2 Sharipov Bakhtiyor AP Shurob Somon Gisar 3 Rahmonaliev Ochildi AP Shurob Somon Gisar 4 Kholova Zaragul AP Shurob Somon Gisar 5 Nazarova Muhabbat AP Shurob Somon Gisar 6 Rahmatova Gulsun AP Shurob Somon Gisar 7 Ruziev Parviz AP 1 – May Tursunzoda 8 Igamberdiev Erkin AP 1 – May Tursunzoda 9 Khanjarov Mirzo AP 1 – May Tursunzoda 10 Negmatov Nazar AP Navobod Tursunzoda 11 Buriev Abdujabbor AP Zarbdor 1 - May Tursunzoda 12 Namozov Khurshed AP Navobod Tursunzoda 13 Dakhiev Haqdod AP Mehrobod Choryakkoron Rudaki 14 Rajabov Umedshoh AP Mehrobod Choryakkoron Rudaki 15 Davlatov Abdusalom AP Mehrobod Choryakkoron Rudaki Ochildiev Sobirjon Land committee Navobod Tursunzoda 16 representative Tursunov Faizullo Head of jamoat Navobod Tursunzoda 17 Navobod Pardaev Nematullo Land committee Mehrobod Choryakkoron Rudaki 18 representative Sheraliev Sadriddin Deputy head of Mehrobod Choryakkoron Rudaki 19 jamoat Saidamadov Siyar Community Mehrobod Choryakkoron Rudaki 20 leader Hakimov Abdukarim Land committee Shurob Somon Gisar 21 representative Kudratov Faizullo SMEC SMEC Dushanbe 22 Resettlement specialist Mirzoev Eraj PIU RR PIU RR Dushanbe 23 resettlement specialist Nazrieva Rangina ADB ADB Dushanbe 24 Resettlement specialist
Appendix 3: Individual APs assessment questionnaire
Project: CAREC Corridor 3 (Dushanbe Uzbekistan border) Improvement Project Funded by: Asian Development Bank Implementer: Ministry of Transport, Republic of Tajikistan Grant No: 0245
EXTERNAL MONITORING OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT IMPLEMENTATION
Project section ___ Road Segment ___ Road Kilometer ____ Road side Right Left Head of household's Name ______
Ownership Male / Female headed F / M
Address village______, jamoat ______, district ______
Did you receive compensation for your affected assets? Yes / No
Were your damaged assets enumerated realistically? Yes / No
If No, give details. Was there any deduction from the approved payment? Yes / No
If Yes, what %: Type of ownership (Please mark) Affected Cultivated Annual Crops Orchard Vineyard Presidential land Land Area m2 Individual Dehkan Farm Compensation Collective Dehkan received (TJS) Farm
Affected Fruit Trees Number of Compensation Trees received (TJS)
Self assessment of the impact on agriculture lands and fruit trees Serious Moderate Minor
Affected Residential and commercial land / Measureme Area m2 Compensatio nts n received AxB (TJS) Residential Commercial
Affected Buildings, Shops, Sheds and Outbuildings Type of buildings Number Measureme Area m² Compensati nts on received axbxc (TJS) Buildings (type1) multi- storey Buildings (type 2)single floor cement Buildings (type 3)single floor burnt bricks Buildings (type 4) single floor mud bricks Buildings (type 5)single floor mud walls Sheds Outbuildings (toilets, barns)
Affected Walls and Fences Walls type Measureme Volume m3 Compensati Fences type Area m² Compensati nts on received on received axbxc (TJS) (TJS)
Self assessment of the impact on buildings and structures Serious Moderate Minor
Household's income sources with the level of importance from 1(low) to 5(high)
Major Economic Activities / Put number according to the level of importance Agriculture Agricultural Small Government Business Transport/taxi Daily Wage labor enterprise and trading
Have your income source been affected by the resettlement? Yes / No If Yes, How?
Are you aware of your own compensation entitlements? Yes / No If No, what did you do? Агар Не, барои фахмидан чи кор кардед?
Were compensation payments sufficient to replace lost assets? Yes / No
If No, than what did you do? Did you know where to complain and what was the result of your complaint?
Are you satisfied with the resettlement process? Yes / No
Explain why:
Were you invited in any meeting / consultations regarding the Resettlement? Yes / No
Tell about topics discussed:
If you had any concern, did you get enough information and were you agree with the arguments provided to you?
Are you planning to demolish walls, structures and clean the land? Yes / No
If Yes, When and how?
If No, Why?
Affected Person's signature Sign:
Name of Interviewer: Sign:
Date of visit ____/_____/201_