DOCSLIB.ORG

The French Revolution and Modern Politics by Brian Fitzpatrick

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The French Revolution and Modern Politics by Brian Fitzpatrick AND MODERNPOLITICS :I.. W f he contours of the monarchy or oligarchy. Rather it was to modern world have been be the servant, the property of the defined essentially by people, the guarantor of the rights and two eighteenth century liberties of citizens rather than the departures from trad- regulator of subjects. The redefinition ition. The first, and without doubt the turned on the Revolution's reversal of farthest reaching of the two, was the so- sovereignty. In principle, at any rate, it called Industrial Revolution, which was the people who embodied heralded a gradual but irresistible shift to sovereignty, not the prince or monarch. a new mode of economic production The Declaration of the Rights of Man and characterised by apparently unlimited of the Citizen, promulgated in August, gowth, constant change as opposed to 1789, makes this quite clear in its stability, mass production and mass preamble, reminding us that the markets, the unprecedented growth of decisions and actions of legislators and urban society and the creation of the now administrators, the purpose of all familiar capitalist and wage-earning political institutions should conform to classes with their distinct and generally the basic principles of safeguarding the mutually hostile goals. inalienable and natural rights of man. It However, if we wish to grasp the followed from this redefinition of the origins of modern politics, the source of relationship of the citizen to the state that so many of our modern political all public offices should be filled by ideologies, it is to the second upheaval, elected citizens. who should then be the ~renchRevolution, that we must accountable for their actions. Certainly, at turn. For the turbulent 1790s in France different times during the Revolution, did not, indeed could not affect that Jean-JacquesRonsseau. different groups interpreted the elective country alone. The Revolution, through principle and the notion of accountability its ideals, slogans and transformations, briefly, some of the more important variously - the very restricted franchise particularly those exported after war legacies of the Revolution, whose two of the men of 1789 came under fire from broke out in 1792, left an indelible mark hundredth anniversary is commem- the popular strata who were excluded, on most parts of Europe. Try as they orated this year. but these 'took their revenge' in 1793 by might, committed opponents of the In the first place, the French enforcing daily accountability on their Revolution failed to eradicate its traces, Revolution marked a radical departure elected representatives, at thelocal level as the political history of the nineteenth from the past in its redefinition of the at least. Even at the height of the 'Terror', century demonstrates with such clarity It state. No longer was the state to be that period of war dictatorship, the war is the purpose of this article to indicate, instrument of control in the service of a cabinets, the Committees of Public Safety A Versailles, A Versailles'- an engraving of the famous women's march of October, 1789, to demand bread; a practical piece of feminine direct action. Desmoulins brandishingpistols as he addresses the crowd outside the Palais-Royal. and General Security, had to have their personally or through their repres- do the same? Freedom was not restricted remit renewed every ten days by the entatives in its formulation'. to France. National Convention, the elected Personal liberty was also at the heart If the early phase of the Revolution representatives of the people. And it is of the Revolution's work. Here we see an was concerned with freedom and rights worth remembering that the Convention understandable reaction to the arbitrary of the citizen, war, self-inflicted in 1792, was able to topple Robespierre and his and repressive denials of what we would led to an extension of the role of the state associates when it became convinced that now deem to be basic human rights: once again. More than one commentator his policies were no longer appropriate. freedom of worship, freedom of thought, has seen in the First French Republic's The notion of popular sovereignty freedom of speech. The Revolution's war effort the orieinsV of modern was itself based on the most fundamental basic definition of freedom was totalitarianism, the subordination of the The 1 principle enunciated by the revolu- utilitarian and expressed in the individual's rights to the claims of the ? tionaries, the belief that 'men are born Declaration of the Rights of Man as state in a manner much more com- I and remain free and equal in rights' 'being able to undertake anything as long prehensive than any anci~nregime state desire , (Declaration of the Rights of Man and of as it does not harm others'. It was up to could have contemplated. Defence of the or her r the Citizen, article one). The notion that the law to ensure that one citizen's liberty Republic led to the mobilisation of the or alle man might be a citizen and might have did not curtail the natural rights of entire population in the war effort. It led freedof rights as well as obligations was a another citizen. These basic liberties did to rationing and to the Terror - the the na? dramatic shift of emphasis to a position make a significant difference. Men had enforced acquiescence of the population modei that we now take for granted. When the right to think differently than their in the national struggle on pain of havini taken in conjunction with the destruction landlords or employers, at least in law; ostracization, confiscation of property, traditif ot privilege announced on the night of 4 Jews and Protestants had the right to imprisonment and finally death. The or the! August, 1789, and defined on 11 August worship freely and publicly - no small concept of the sovereignty of the people from r somewhat less liberally, this proc- change given the forme$ monopoly of the was never lost, but the way in which it require lamation of equal and inalienable rights Roman Catholic church on religious was interpreted points very plainly to the the in was the cornerstone of the French matters, and the minimal concession of Bolshevik concept of the dictatorship of constit Revolution, and was a truly revolu- tolerance of the Protestant denomin- the proletariat in the sense that Cl0 tionary proposition as far as the nature of ations embodied in the 1787 Edict of democracy was set aside during a people politics was concerned. From it stemmed Toleration after a century of official crucial, transitional period, and effective politic1 logically the modern tradition of mass intolerance of ~rotestantism: leadership was entrusted to an elite respec politics and advancement based solely It is of great importance to note that which combined expediency with birth 4 on merit, of one legal system to be the rights and liberties set out in the ideology and justified its action in the nation' applied to all and open to all. During the declarations and decrees of the National name of the people. Or, in more general, doctrif course of the Revolution, the latter Assembly had a universal import. The but similar twentieth-century terms, one revold consequence, that of one law for all, revolutionaries were not talking about might see in the rule of the committees of inspij proved more acceptable to many than the rights of the Frenchman or of the the French Republic the prototype of demad did the notion of political democracy, French citizen. The 'lessons' of 1789 and modern war cabinets and dictatorships or nay although circumstances imposed this the ideals of the Revolution were which all place national salvation abo;e themsl from 1792 to 1795, and it was no more universal. This is what made the French thehmn%i rights and freedoms of the the R4 than a reasonable interpretation of article Revolution a European affair from the individual. natio! six of the Declaration of the Rights of very beginning. If the French could In these terms, the French Revolution loyalf Man which stated that 'The lwis the establish a political system based on the embodies all the ambiguities inherent in Revoll expression of the general will. All rights of man and on popular the relationship between the individual gened citizens have the right to participate sovereignty, why could other peoples not and the state in the modern world - the subs4 The most famous National Guardsmen were the volunteers from Marseilles who marched on Paris singing their famous song, the 'Marseillaise', which had been composed by Rouget de L7sle. A song-sheet illustrates the scene. desire of the individual to maximise his thought. Anyone who accepted liberty most compelling force in political life in or her freedom, and the need, perceived and popular sovereignty as the highest most parts of the world. or alleged, of the state to limit that values could style himself a French It should be said that the French freedom in the name of class interest or citizen - hence the citizenship conferred Revolution did not proceed according to the national interest, both of which are on Tom Paine, Priestly and Wolfe Tone. a preconceived plan. We should modern, ideologically based concepts There was none of the cultural, linguistic remember that it began as a reform having little or nothing to do with or racial exclusiveness associated with movement. Certainly, the reformers had traditional interests like dynastic claims many subsequent brands of nationalism. political ideals, but rarely did or the whims of rulers, and which, far It must also be said that the circumstances allow them to apply the from resulting from arbitrary decisions, Revolution promoted nationalism quite ideals in a thorough manner, or even to require the force of duly passed laws or unwittingly as German$ Dutch, Belgians hammer out the practical consequences the invocation of ideology and/or and Spaniards began to feel the presence of the ideals they proclaimed freely in the constitutional provisions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Philibert Joseph Roux (1780–1854)
    SURGEONS Philibert Joseph Roux (1780–1854) He´le`ne Perdicoyianni-Pale´ologou Summary: Philibert Joseph Roux (1780–1854), a French surgeon, was a student and friend of Marie Xavier Franc¸ois Bichat, the father of modern pathology and histology. He was assigned as a surgeon to the Hoˆpital Beaujon (1806), the Hoˆpital de la Charite´ (1810) and to Hoˆtel-Dieu de Paris (1835), where he succeeded to Guillaume Dupuyrten, a French anatomist, as a Chief Surgeon. Roux is best known for having performed the surgical repair of a cleft palate and for having been the first surgeon to stitch a ruptured female perineum. His contribution to surgery has also included the publication of Quarante anne´es de pratique chirurgicale. Roux was awarded the grade of Chevalier of the National Order of the legion of Honor and that of Officer. He also served as a President of the Academy of Sciences. He died of a stroke on 3 March 1854. Philibert Joseph Roux was born on 26 April 1780 at Medical studies Auxerre, a commune in the Bourgogne region in north-central France. His father, Jacques Roux, At the suggestion of his father he continued his a Surgeon-in-Chief first at the Hoˆtel-Dieu1 in Paris and medical studies in Paris. He presented himself at the later at E´ cole Militaire in Auxerre, treated him with Concours d’Entre´e to the Val-de-Graˆce7 but failed com- great harshness and severity in response to his idleness prehensively. He then decided to study at the E´ cole de and intemperance.
    [Show full text]
  • Populist Discourse in the French Revolution Rebecca Dudley
    Sigma: Journal of Political and International Studies Volume 33 Article 6 2016 Do You Hear the People Sing?: Populist Discourse in the French Revolution Rebecca Dudley Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sigma Part of the European History Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Dudley, Rebecca (2016) "Do You Hear the People Sing?: Populist Discourse in the French Revolution," Sigma: Journal of Political and International Studies: Vol. 33 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sigma/vol33/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sigma: Journal of Political and International Studies by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Do You Hear the People Sing?: Populist Discourse in the French Revolution by Rebecca Dudley The rallying cry of the French Revolutionaries was "Liberte! Egalite! Fraternite!" (liberty, equality, fraternity), and the French Revolution, a pivotal moment in French, European, and world history, has been consistently considered one of the first and most significant nationalist movements. Research and literature thus far on discourse in this revolution have focused on nationalism Qenkins 1990; Hayward 1991; O'Brien 1988), along with the discourses of violence and terror that led to the graphic revolu­ tion (Ozouf 1984; Leoussi 2001). The presence of nationalist discourse and nationalist sentiment in the French Revolution is undeniable, but there are other elements poten­ tially missing from the current analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • El Terror De Estado Francés: Una Perspectiva Jurídica
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Revistas UPO (Universidad Pablo de Olivade) EL TERROR DE ESTADO FRANCÉS: UNA PERSPECTIVA JURÍDICA FRENCH STATE OF TERROR: A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE Dr. Carlos Aguilar Blanc Recibido: octubre de 2012 Universidad Pablo de Olavide de Sevilla Aceptado: noviembre de 2012 [[email protected]] “La revolución no cambió en absoluto la naturaleza humana. Los hombres siguieron conservando sus cualidades y sus defectos pero la revolución llevó a unas y a otros a un grado desconocido hasta entonces” Barón THIBAUDEAU Antiguo Convencional Palabras claves: Terror de Estado, terroristas, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Maximilien Robespierre, Jean-Paul Marat, Thomas Paine, Alexis de Tocqueville, Edmund Burke. Keywords: State of Terror, terrorist, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Maximilien Robespierre, Jean-Paul Marat, Thomas Paine, Alexis de Tocqueville, Edmund Burke. Resumen: La naturaleza singular del Terror de Estado Francés, frente a las formas de miedo secular y de violencia, previas al estallido revolucio- nario popular y jacobino. El hecho novedoso que supuso la legitimación política y legal del Terror de Estado. La refl exión y estudio de la legisla- ción francesa terrorista a la luz de la Filosofía del Derecho y de clásicos como Thomas Paine, Alexis de Tocqueville, o Edmund Burke. Abstrasct: The singular nature of the French State of Terror, against the secular forms of fear and violence, priors to the popular and Jacobin re- volutionary outbreak. The new fact that supposed the legal and political legitimacy of the State of Terror. The refl ection and study of the French terrorist legislation in the light of the Philosophy of Law and the classics like Thomas Paine, Alexis de Tocqueville, or Edmund Burke.
    [Show full text]
  • HSTR 352.01: French Revolution 1789-1848
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Syllabi Course Syllabi Summer 6-2016 HSTR 352.01: French Revolution 1789-1848 Linda S. Frey University of Montana - Missoula, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/syllabi Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Frey, Linda S., "HSTR 352.01: French Revolution 1789-1848" (2016). Syllabi. 4242. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/syllabi/4242 This Syllabus is brought to you for free and open access by the Course Syllabi at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syllabi by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Summer 2016 Prof. Frey FRENCH REVOLUTION Required Reading Wright, France in Modern Times Tocqueville, The Old Regime and the French Revolution Palmer, Twelve Who Ruled Rowe, “Civilians and Warfare during the French Revolutionary Wars.” (reserve) Holtman, The Napoleonic Revolution Walter, Diary of a Napoleonic Soldier Supplementary readings are available at the reserve desk at the Mansfield Library. Exams This class is only offered for a traditional grade. Midterm (tentative date June 8) will cover Wright pp. 3-56, Tocqueville, Rowe, Palmer, and readings on reserve. Final will cover Wright, pp. 57-122, Holtman, and Walter, and readings on reserve. Papers are due June 13 at the beginning of the class hour. No electronic submissions will be accepted. LATE PAPERS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Length: 5-7 pages double spaced. Style: Chicago Manual of Style, Footnotes. All papers should be submitted with the usual scholarly apparatus, that is, title page, footnotes, and bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • Marat/Sade Department of Theatre, Florida International University
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons Department of Theatre Production Programs Department of Theatre Spring 4-6-2000 Marat/Sade Department of Theatre, Florida International University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/theatre_programs Part of the Theatre and Performance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Department of Theatre, Florida International University, "Marat/Sade" (2000). Department of Theatre Production Programs. 28. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/theatre_programs/28 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Theatre at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Department of Theatre Production Programs by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ~ -, ~ ~~acobiOs: a club of revolution.ary radicals founded in 1789 whose members e7~ : ""-·· first assemqled in an unused monastery of the Jacobins (Dominicans) in Paris. Urid~r the leadership of ROBESPIERRE,DANTON and MARAT,the Jacobins became the dominant force in the CONVENTIONwhere they sat Program notes on the lcft, facing their opponents, the GIRONDISTSwho sat on the right. After Robespierre's downfall the club was closed. Revolution begetscounter-revolution. Civil war spawns politicalmistrust and Lavoisier: Antoine Laurent de Lavoisier (1743-94), maj~r figure in modern bipartisanbetrayal. What nation ever discoversa lasting democraticpanacea chemistry,guillotined. when inequality, poverty, illiteracy and discrimination still abound? Each Marat: Jeari-Paul Marat ( 1743-93), physician and naturalist, author of med­ ge~erationin its turn has raised the callfor radicalchange. It is the order of ical, philosophical and political v.:-orks.During the early stages of the things to provoke change.
    [Show full text]
  • Marat/Sade's Missing Epilogue"
    Spring 1988 61 "Marat/Sade's Missing Epilogue" Roger Gross Script interpretation is often strongly influenced by what inter­ preters have read about a script and by what they have seen of it on the stage. If critical or theatrical impressions are very strong, it may not be possible to give the script a clear-eyed, unprejudiced reading. Critics and directors often influence us more powerfully than we or they know or intend. Eventually, when scholars write about the impact of brilliant-but- misguided productions on the understanding of particular scripts, Peter Brook's productions of Marat/Sade will provide an ideal case study. Though Brook's productions (stage and film) made Peter Weiss famous in the English-speaking world and provoked many productions of the script, they also misrepresented the text extremely and the script has not recovered. The memory of Brook's brilliantly theatrical staging overwhelms interpretation. Directors mount versions of Brook's Marat/Sade, not Weiss'. Twenty three years after Brook's production, the image of the performance still dominates. This case is an extreme one. It is certainly not unusual for a production to serve different goals and communicate different meanings than those intended by the author or implied by the script. With Shakespeare, it seems to happen more often than not. But in most of these cases no long-term harm is done because the original script is available and the memory of the production passes quickly. Even such extreme instances as Elia Kazan's revisions of J.B. and Cat on a Hot Tin Roof did little harm because the authors' preferred texts were published as were their arguments in support of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Gracchus Babeuf and the Revolutionary Language of Thermidor
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 3-1997 From the Printing Press to the Guillotine: Gracchus Babeuf and the Revolutionary Language of Thermidor David Brian Audley Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the European History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Audley, David Brian, "From the Printing Press to the Guillotine: Gracchus Babeuf and the Revolutionary Language of Thermidor" (1997). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5740. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7611 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. THESIS APPROVAL The abstract and thesis of David Brian Audley for the Master of Arts in History were presented February 14, 1997, and accepted by the thesis committee and the department. COMMITTEE APPROVALS: Thomas M. Luckett, Chair Robert Liebman Representative of the Office of Graduate Studies DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: G~s,~ Department of History * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ACCEPTED FOR PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY BY THE LIBRARY by ABSTRACT An abstract of the thesis of David Brian Audley for the Master of Arts in History presented February 14, 1997. Title: From the Printing Press to the Guillotine: Gracchus Babeuf and the Revolutionary Language of Thermidor. The traditional history of Fran9ois-Noel 'Gracchus' Babeuf has been centered on politics and socialism. Sine his death in 1797 historians have attempted to show the foundations of nineteenth and twentieth-century social revolution and communism in the polemical works of Babeuf.
    [Show full text]
  • AP European History Mr. Blackmon the French Revolution and Napoleon Page 2
    AP European History Mr. Blackmon The French Revolution and Napoleon I. France on the Eve of the Revolution A . Major Social Groups 1. First Estate 2. Second Estate 3. Third Estate B . The First Estate: The Clergy 1. 130,000 clergymen (priests, monks, and nuns) 2. Higher Clergy: Bishops, Archbishops, Abbots a. Drawn from nobility b. Large incomes c. Generally supportive of the Second Estate 3.Lower Clergy: Parish priests a. Drawn from the Third Estate b. Quite poor c. Tended to identify with their flock d. Rural parishioners often devout and devoted to their priest e. Initially will support the Revolution C . The Second Estate: The Nobility 1.Noblesse d’epée: Ancient families 2. Nobility of the Robe: Families which had purchased or earned titles through service to the monarch. a. 400,000 out of 25,000,000 3. Court Nobility a. Centered at Versailles, wealthier, influenced by the Enlightenment b. Serve as Tax Farmers, ministers c. Some are very Reactionary: Charles, duc d’Artois (later Charles X, who had “learned nothing and forgotten nothing.” d. Some are strongly influenced by the Enlightenment (1) Louis-Phillippe, duc d’Orleans (Phillippe Egalite) (2) Marquis de Lafayette (3) Comte de Mirabeau (4) Duc de Talleyrand (5) Condorcet 4. Provincial Nobility a. Much poorer b. Quite conservative D. The Third Estate 1. Peasants: 80% a. 1,500,000 were serfs b. Peasants owned 50% of the land in France c. The peasantry is not united! AP European History Mr. Blackmon The French Revolution and Napoleon Page 2 (1) Village life was quite hierarchical (a) At the top were big farmers, who owned their own land and farmed estates as tenants.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Wollstonecraft: a Feminist Exile in Paris
    MARY WOLLSTONECRAFT: A FEMINIST EXILE IN PARIS E.J. Clery In A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792) and other writings, Mary Wollstonecraft described the state of Englishwomen in their native land figuratively as that of a slave, an outlaw and an exile. This view was shared by other women writers across the political spectrum in the 1790s, including Charlotte Smith and Frances Burney. The idea of women’s dis- patriation by the laws of England provides a context for reconsidering Wollstonecraft’s twenty- seven month period as an expatriate in revolutionary France. Three specific questions are addressed: Why did she go to Paris in December 1792? Why did she decide to stay at the outbreak of war between Britain and France in February 1793? And why was she so resistant to the idea of leaving Paris and returning to London in early 1795? The trope of the feminist exile offers valuable guidance when exploring her motivations. A distinctive set of priorities comes into focus, setting Wollstonecraft apart from her compatriots and fellow-radicals in the French capital at the time. Both the influence of working-class citoyennes on economic policy and the liberalisation of family law at the outset of the Republic made a profound impression on her, revealed most fully in her correspondence and in the unfinished novel The Wrongs of Woman; or, Maria (1798). Introduction […] as a woman, I have no country. As a woman I want no country. As a woman my country is the whole world. Virginia Woolf, Three Guineas (1938)1 When Virginia Woolf wrote Three Guineas, her feminist rejection of militaristic patriotism on the eve of the Second World War, she took inspiration from Mary 1 Virginia Woolf, Three Guineas (London: Hogarth Press, 1986) 125.
    [Show full text]
  • French Revolution Part II the Republic, the Convention, The
    French Revolution Part II The Republic, the Convention, the Terror and the fall of Robespierre POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ENLIGHTENMENT: possible forms of "enlightened" government I. ENLIGHTENED DESPOTISM OR ABSOLUTISM builds on 17th C. models of absolutist royal rule, such as Louis XIV in France (“ l’état, c’est moi” – I am the state.) image of government by "enlightened," educated monarch, who legislates for good of society models in eastern Europe: Prussia under Frederick II, Russia under Catherine the Great (sort of) Austro-Hungarian/Hapsburg Empire (Joseph II, son of Maria Theresa) II. CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY model of English monarchy: King with consent of Parliament limited powers of monarch, combined with representative assembly make this a "reasonable" approach; first government of French Revolution = from absolutism to (reluctant) constitutional monarchy 1791-92 Constitutional Monarchy: Constitution drafted by National Assembly (3rd Estate plus supporters from 1st & 2cd) 1793 execution of Louis XIII as Citizen Capet III. REPUBLICANISM radical, non-monarchical alternative of American colonies in 1776 Revolution 1792-95 First French Republic influenced by Rousseau, by American Republic of 1776 by classical model of ancient Roman Republic FORMS OF GOVERNMENT DURING THE FRENCH REVOLUTION: Popular Jacobinism Constitutional Constitutional Absolutism Revolution (radical republicanism monarchy republicanism) Parisian ← 1792 ← 1789-92 ← 1788 Louis XVI risings → 1793 –1794 → 1795 1815 ← 1799 Napoleon Convention Directory The Terror LEFT RIGHT Flight to Varennes: June 1791 Turning point in the hopes for a Constitutional Monarchy -- occurs before the new Constitution creating a Constitutional Monarchy was even enacted -- reluctantly signed by a discredited King. The flight to Varennes June 1791 royal family returned to Tuileries Palace in Paris under house arrest June 1791 Return of the royal family from the border town of Varennes Republican opposition to the continuation of monarchy grows.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Struggle in the First French Republic Bourgeois and Bras Nus 1793-1795
    Daniel Guerin Class Struggle in the First French Republic Bourgeois and Bras Nus 1793-1795 translated from the French by Ian Patterson First published in French in 1973 Copyright© Editions Gallimard 1973 This translation first published 1977 by Pluto Press Limited Unit 10 Spencer Court, 7 Chalcot Road, London NWl 8LH Copyright© Pluto Press 1977 ISBN 0 904383 44 X paperback 0 904383 30 X hardback Printed in England by Bristol Typesetting Company Limited Barton Manor, St Philips, Bristol Cover design by David King Contents Translator's Note/ vii Chronology / xi Preface to the English Language Edition / 1 Introduction/ 21 1. The Split to be A voided / 45 2. A Divorce in the Revolutionary Bourgeoisie / 73 3. Providing Support for the Poor I 94 4. Liquidation of the Enrages / 119 5. A Diversion Turns into an Upsurge/ 132 6. The Revolution Makes an About Turn/ 155 7. Strengthening the State/ 176 8. The Fall of the Hebertists / 195 9. Economic Retreat/ 218 10. The Fall of Danton, and its Reverberations / 234 11. Thennidor / 249 12. The Veil is Torn/ 268 Index/ 289 Translator's Note French terms have been translated wherever possible and explanatory phrases inserted where necessary. However, some aspects of revolutionary France demand fuller explanation. Revolutionary administration Under the law of 22 December 1789, which reorganised the electoral system, France was divided into 83 'departements', each of which was administered by an elected Council. Each Council appointed an Executive - or Directory - of eight mem­ bers, including a procureur-general-syndic who was responsible for the implementation and enforcement of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Insurgent Universality
    OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRSTPROOFS, Mon Jan 28 2019, NEWGEN INSURGENT UNIVERSALITY Tomba190918ATUS_MU.indd 1 28-Jan-19 11:53:18 PM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRSTPROOFS, Mon Jan 28 2019, NEWGEN HERETICAL THOUGHT Series editor: Ruth O’Brien, Te Graduate Center, City University of New York Assembly Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri Te Rise of Neoliberal Feminism Catherine Rottenberg Tomba190918ATUS_MU.indd 2 28-Jan-19 11:53:18 PM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRSTPROOFS, Mon Jan 28 2019, NEWGEN INSURGENT UNIVERSALITY An Alternative Legacy of Modernity MASSIMILIANO TOMBA 1 Tomba190918ATUS_MU.indd 3 28-Jan-19 11:53:18 PM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRSTPROOFS, Mon Jan 28 2019, NEWGEN 1 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries. Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America. © Oxford University Press 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer.
    [Show full text]