DOCSLIB.ORG

Wild Sky Wilderness Air Quality Report, 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wild Sky Wilderness Air Quality Report, 2012 Wild Sky Wilderness Air Quality Report Wilderness ID: 442 Wilderness Name: Wild Sky Wilderness Wild Sky Wilderness Air Quality Report National Forest: Snoqualmie National Forest State: WA Counties: King, Snohomish General Location: Central Washington Cascade Range Acres: 105,561 Thursday, May 17, 2012 Page 1 of 5 Wild Sky Wilderness Air Quality Report Wilderness ID: 442 Wilderness Name: Wild Sky Wilderness Wilderness Categories Information Specific to this Wilderness Year Established 2008 Establishment Notes The Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 Designation Clean Air Act Class 2 Administrative Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Unique Landscape Features The Wild Sky Wilderness is the newest addition to a 2.6 million acre wilderness complex that straddles the rugged North Cascade Range from Canada to Snoqualmie Pass. The southwestern portion of the wilderness is only 25 miles from Puget Sound and adjacent to the fast growing communities of the Skykomish River Valley. The western part of the wilderness is characterized by very steep slopes and dramatic local relief. For example, from the North Fork Skykomish River near the town of Index, the terrain rises from about 600 feet above sea level to over 6,000 feet, on Gunn Peak, in less than 3 miles. Annual precipitation in this area runs between 150 to 200 inches annually, most of it coming as snow during the wet winter months. Runoff from the rain and snow feed streams that drop into the deep valleys below. This source of clean water is important to salmon which spawn in these reaches and provide exciting spring raft trips on the Skykomish River. Vegetation is dense on the valley walls, composed of Douglas fir, western red cedar and western hemlock at the lower elevations, grading to silver fir and mountain hemlock in the mid elevations to sub alpine parklands in the higher reaches. Timberline in the area is relatively low, between 4,500 and 5,000 feet. The higher peaks such as Merchant, Gunn, and Spire sport permanent ice patches on their north and east slopes. Trails in this part of the wilderness are few and cross-country travel is difficult. East of the Beckler River, and the Straight Creek Fault, the terrain changes dramatically; the local relief is less dramatic, the geology is less chaotic and precipitation less. The ridges are more uniform in elevation and gentle enough to support large meadows. This is trail country! Trails including Meadow Creek, West Cady Creek and Johnson Ridge lead through forest to these flowery meadows. Several trails are open to use by stock animals and wonderful loop trips pass through the Henry M. Jackson Wilderness to the Pacific Crest Trail, and back to Wild Sky. The Evergreen Mountain Lookout is a rental cabin that will continue to operate within the wilderness. At 5,587 feet, it provides a spectacular perch to watch the sunset over the rough peaks of Wild Sky and take in the panoramic view from Glacier Peak to Mt. Rainier. Stands of old growth forest cover portions of the area with large diameter Douglas fir, hemlock and western red cedar. The West Cady Ridge Trail leads through a prime example of these large trees which provide critical habitat for a variety of bird and animal species. Scattered around the new wilderness are forest areas previously roaded and logged. Logging began around 1920 and continued into the early 1990¿s. Signs of past mining exploration are also evident, particularly in the Silver Creek area. Young trees are now healing the scars of these past activities. The area holds about a dozen mountain lakes that attract anglers. Lake Isabel is the largest of these at about 1.5 miles long and 200 feet deep. The historic use of float planes is allowed to continue on the lake. Lakebed Geology Sensitivity N/A Lakebed Geology Composition Not reported in the database. Thursday, May 17, 2012 Page 2 of 5 Wild Sky Wilderness Air Quality Report Wilderness ID: 442 Wilderness Name: Wild Sky Wilderness Wilderness Categories Information Specific to this Wilderness Visitor Use Not reported in the database. Mean Annual Precipitation Not reported in the database. Elevation Range 224 - 1888 (meters) Mean Max Aug Temp Not reported in the database. Mean Min Dec Temp Not reported in the database. Lake Acres 224 Pond Acres 101 Lake Count 3 Pond Count 29 TES Flora Allotropa virgata, Arceuthobium tsugense, Botrychium minganense, Botrychium montanum, Carex stylosa, Chaenotheca chrysocephala, Coptis aspleniifolia, Fuscopannaria saubinetii, Galium kamtschaticum, Hygrophorus karstenii, Hypogymnia duplicata, Leptogium cyanescens, Lobaria linita, Peltigera collina, Peltigera pacifica, Platanthera chorisiana, Platanthera orbiculata, Platismatia lacunosa, Plectania melastoma, Pseudocyphellaria anomala, Pseudocyphellaria rainierensis, Ptilidium californicum, Rhizomnium nudum, Rhizopogon parksii, Schistostega pennata, Sticta fuliginosa, Streptopus streptopoides TES Wildlife Not reported in the database. TES Fish bull trout, chinook salmon, steelhead Ozone Sensitive Plants Not reported in the database. Air Quality Sensitive Lichens Not reported in the database. Cultural Resources Not reported in the database. Status/Trends: Acid Deposition: Not reported in the database. Status/Trends: Nutrient Not reported in the database. Enrichment: Status/Trends: Ozone Impacts: Not reported in the database. AQRV's Fauna Fauna Priority: Medium Fauna Receptor: Fish Fauna Indicator: Concentration of methyl mercury Fauna Trends: Not reported in the database. Fauna Actions: Sample fish for mercury from the most heavily fished lakes (including both people and wildlife). Collect water quality samples from the same waters during the same site visit. Flora Flora Priority: High Flora Receptor: Lichens Flora Indicator: Changes in community composition Flora Trends: Not reported in the database. Thursday, May 17, 2012 Page 3 of 5 Wild Sky Wilderness Air Quality Report Wilderness ID: 442 Wilderness Name: Wild Sky Wilderness Flora Priority 2: High Flora Receptor 2: Lichens Flora Indicator 2: Concentrations of N, S, P, Cd, Cr, Pb, Hg, Ni, Ti, V and Zn Flora Trends 2: Not reported in the database. Flora Priority 3: Medium Flora Receptor 3: Ozone Flora Indicator 3: Visible injury on ozone-sensitive plants Flora Trends 3: Not reported in the database. Flora Actions: Increase lichen plot density by 3 more plots to achieve 1 plot/20,000 acre desired spatial density. Revisit plots once every 10 years. Consider surveying vegetation for ozone injury while on site. Visibility Visibility Priority: Medium Visibility Receptor: Scenic Views Visibility Indicator: Regional haze Visibility Trends: Not reported in the database. Visibility Actions Nearest IMPROVE visibility monitor is located at Snoqualmie Pass (SNPA1). Water Water Priority: High Water Receptor: Water Chemistry Water Indicator: ANC Water Trends: Not reported in the database. Water Priority 2: High Water Receptor 2: Water Chemistry Water Indicator 2: DIN: TP Water Trends 2: Not reported in the database. Water Priority 3: Medium Water Receptor 3: Diatoms Water Indicator 3: Community Composition Water Trends 3: Not reported in the database Water Actions: Collect water samples from headwater lakes. Analyze for cations, anions, and nutrients. Challenge Points Fauna Challenge Points: Not reported in the database. Flora Challenge Points: 4 Total Plots: 2 Desired Plots: 5 Additional Plots Needed: 3 Data Type: Baseline Round 1 Visits: 0 Round 2 Visits: 2 Baseline %: 38 Thursday, May 17, 2012 Page 4 of 5 Wild Sky Wilderness Air Quality Report Wilderness ID: 442 Wilderness Name: Wild Sky Wilderness Trends %: 0 Visibility Challenge Points: Not reported in the database. Water Challenge Points: Not reported in the database. Thursday, May 17, 2012 Page 5 of 5 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geology and Structural Evolution of the Foss River-Deception Creek Area, Cascade Mountains, Washington
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF James William McDougall for the degree of Master of Science in Geology presented on Lune, icnct Title: GEOLOGY AND STRUCTURALEVOLUTION OF THE FOSS RIVER-DECEPTION CREEK AREA,CASCADE MOUNTAINS, WASHINGTOV, Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: Robert S. Yekis Southwest of Stevens Pass, Washington,immediately west of the crest of the Cascade Range, pre-Tertiaryrocks include the Chiwaukum Schist, dominantly biotite-quartzschist characterized by a polyphase metamorphic history,that correlates with schistose basement east of the area of study.Pre-Tertiary Easton Schist, dominated by graphitic phyllite, is principallyexposed in a horst on Tonga Ridge, however, it also occurs eastof the horst.Altered peridotite correlated to Late Jurassic IngallsComplex crops out on the western margin of the Mount Stuart uplift nearDeception Pass. The Mount Stuart batholith of Late Cretaceous age,dominantly granodiorite to tonalite, and its satellite, the Beck lerPeak stock, intrude Chiwaukum Schist, Easton Schist, andIngalls Complex. Tertiary rocks include early Eocene Swauk Formation, a thick sequence of fluviatile polymictic conglomerateand arkosic sandstone that contains clasts resembling metamorphic and plutonic basement rocks in the northwestern part of the thesis area.The Swauk Formation lacks clasts of Chiwaukum Schist that would be ex- pected from source areas to the east and northeast.The Oligocene (?) Mount Daniel volcanics, dominated by altered pyroclastic rocks, in- trude and unconformably overlie the Swauk Formation.The
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Geologic Investigations Series I-1963, Pamphlet
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I-1963 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE SKYKOMISH RIVER 30- BY 60 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON By R.W. Tabor, V.A. Frizzell, Jr., D.B. Booth, R.B. Waitt, J.T. Whetten, and R.E. Zartman INTRODUCTION From the eastern-most edges of suburban Seattle, the Skykomish River quadrangle stretches east across the low rolling hills and broad river valleys of the Puget Lowland, across the forested foothills of the North Cascades, and across high meadowlands to the bare rock peaks of the Cascade crest. The quadrangle straddles parts of two major river systems, the Skykomish and the Snoqualmie Rivers, which drain westward from the mountains to the lowlands (figs. 1 and 2). In the late 19th Century mineral deposits were discovered in the Monte Cristo, Silver Creek and the Index mining districts within the Skykomish River quadrangle. Soon after came the geologists: Spurr (1901) studied base- and precious- metal deposits in the Monte Cristo district and Weaver (1912a) and Smith (1915, 1916, 1917) in the Index district. General geologic mapping was begun by Oles (1956), Galster (1956), and Yeats (1958a) who mapped many of the essential features recognized today. Areas in which additional studies have been undertaken are shown on figure 3. Our work in the Skykomish River quadrangle, the northwest quadrant of the Wenatchee 1° by 2° quadrangle, began in 1975 and is part of a larger mapping project covering the Wenatchee quadrangle (fig. 1). Tabor, Frizzell, Whetten, and Booth have primary responsibility for bedrock mapping and compilation.
    [Show full text]
  • Index-Galena Road Milepost 6.4 – Milepost 6.9
    INDEX-GALENA ROAD MILEPOST 6.4 – MILEPOST 6.9 Snohomish County, Washington Finding of No Significant Impact April 2017 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) assure full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 and related statues by prohibiting discrimination based on race, color, national origin and sex in provision of benefits and services. For more information about Title VI, please call the WSDOT Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7098. Page 2 Finding Of No Significant Impact Index-Galena Road Milepost 6.4-6.9 Description of Proposed Action The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and Snohomish County Public Works, issued an Environmental Assessment (EA) on September 19, 2016. The project will construct a relocated roadway that will extend from an area in proximity to the lower washout at Index-Galena Road Milepost 6.4 to an area in proximity to the upper washout at Milepost 6.9. The roadway will be relocated landward from the North Fork Skykomish River outside of the floodplain and channel migration zone. The roadway is located in unincorporated Snohomish County, Washington upstream from the town of Index. The relocated roadway will re-establish roadway connectivity on Index-Galena Road for residences, emergency service providers, recreationists, and land managed by the U. S Forest Service. The improvements will include shifting the existing roadway alignment to the south away from the river to establish a relocated roadway upslope from the existing damaged roadway.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • 1976 Bicentennial Mckinley South Buttress Expedition
    THE MOUNTAINEER • Cover:Mowich Glacier Art Wolfe The Mountaineer EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Verna Ness, Editor; Herb Belanger, Don Brooks, Garth Ferber. Trudi Ferber, Bill French, Jr., Christa Lewis, Mariann Schmitt, Paul Seeman, Loretta Slater, Roseanne Stukel, Mary Jane Ware. Writing, graphics and photographs should be submitted to the Annual Editor, The Mountaineer, at the address below, before January 15, 1978 for consideration. Photographs should be black and white prints, at least 5 x 7 inches, with caption and photo­ grapher's name on back. Manuscripts should be typed double· spaced, with at least 1 Y:z inch margins, and include writer's name, address and phone number. Graphics should have caption and artist's name on back. Manuscripts cannot be returned. Properly identified photographs and graphics will be returnedabout June. Copyright © 1977, The Mountaineers. Entered as second·class matter April8, 1922, at Post Office, Seattle, Washington, under the act of March 3, 1879. Published monthly, except July, when semi-monthly, by The Mountaineers, 719 Pike Street,Seattle, Washington 98101. Subscription price, monthly bulletin and annual, $6.00 per year. ISBN 0-916890-52-X 2 THE MOUNTAINEERS PURPOSES To explore and study the mountains, forests, and watercourses of the Northwest; To gather into permanentform the history and tra­ ditions of thisregion; To preserve by the encouragement of protective legislation or otherwise the natural beauty of NorthwestAmerica; To make expeditions into these regions in fulfill­ ment of the above purposes; To encourage a spirit of good fellowship among all loversof outdoor life. 0 � . �·' ' :···_I·:_ Red Heather ' J BJ. Packard 3 The Mountaineer At FerryBasin B.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Analysis Template
    Miller-Foss Watershed Analysis References Baenen, J. 1981. Stillaguamish, Snohomish, Snoqualmie, and Duwamish. In: Blukis Onat, A.R.; Hollenbeck, J.L. (eds.) Inventory of Native American Religious Use, Practices, Localities, and Resources.. Seattle, WA: Institute of Cooperative Research. 396-471. Bilby, E.; J. Ward. 1989. Changes in characteristics and function of woody debris with increasing size of streams in Western Washington. Transcript. Portland, OR: American Fisheries Society: 118: 363-378. Bisson, P.A.; Bilby, R.E.; Bryant, M.D.; Dolloff, C.A.; Grette, G..B.; House, R.A.; Murphy, M.L.; Koski, K.V.; Sedell, J.R. 1987. Large woody debris in forested streams in the Pacific Northwest: Past, present and future. 143-190. In: Salo, E.O.; and Cundy, T.; ed. Streamside management: Forestry and fishery interactions. Seattle, WA: College of Forest Resources. University of Washington. Contribution no. 57. Blukis Onat, A.R.; Hollenbeck, J.L. (eds.). 1981. Inventory of religious use, practices, localities, and resources. Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest. Seattle, WA: Institute of Cooperative Research. Booth; D.B. Goldstein, B. 1994. Patterns and processes of landscape development by the Puget lobe ice sheet. In: Lasmanis E.; Cheney, R., eds.. 1994. Regional Geology of Washington State, Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources, bulletin no. 80, 227. Bortleson, G..; Dion, N.; McConnel, J.; and Nelson. L. 1976. Reconnaissance data on lakes in Washington, vol. 2 (King and Snohomish Counties). Washington State Dept. of Ecology and U.S. Department of the Interior (USDI), Geological Survey, water-supply, bulletin no. 43(2). Brown, J.K.et al. 2001. Coarse woody debris and succession in the recovering forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Gold and Fish Pamphlet: Rules for Mineral Prospecting and Placer Mining
    WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Gold and Fish Rules for Mineral Prospecting and Placer Mining May 2021 WDFW | 2020 GOLD and FISH - 2nd Edition Table of Contents Mineral Prospecting and Placer Mining Rules 1 Agencies with an Interest in Mineral Prospecting 1 Definitions of Terms 8 Mineral Prospecting in Freshwater Without Timing Restrictions 12 Mineral Prospecting in Freshwaters With Timing Restrictions 14 Mineral Prospecting on Ocean Beaches 16 Authorized Work Times 17 Penalties 42 List of Figures Figure 1. High-banker 9 Figure 2. Mini high-banker 9 Figure 3. Mini rocker box (top view and bottom view) 9 Figure 4. Pan 10 Figure 5. Power sluice/suction dredge combination 10 Figure 6. Cross section of a typical redd 10 Fig u re 7. Rocker box (top view and bottom view) 10 Figure 8. Sluice 11 Figure 9. Spiral wheel 11 Figure 10. Suction dredge . 11 Figure 11. Cross section of a typical body of water, showing areas where excavation is not permitted under rules for mineral prospecting without timing restrictions Dashed lines indicate areas where excavation is not permitted 12 Figure 12. Permitted and prohibited excavation sites in a typical body of water under rules for mineral prospecting without timing restrictions Dashed lines indicate areas where excavation is not permitted 12 Figure 13. Limits on excavating, collecting, and removing aggregate on stream banks 14 Figure 14. Excavating, collecting, and removing aggregate within the wetted perimeter is not permitted 1 4 Figure 15. Cross section of a typical body of water showing unstable slopes, stable areas, and permissible or prohibited excavation sites under rules for mineral prospecting with timing restrictions Dashed lines indicates areas where excavation is not permitted 15 Figure 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Mark Rey Under Secretary United States Department of Agriculture
    Statement of Mark Rey Under Secretary United States Department Of Agriculture Before the Subcommittee on Public Lands and Forests Committee on Energy and Natural Resources United States Senate On June 4, 2003 Concerning S. 391 Wild Sky Wilderness Act of 2003 S. 1003 Outfitter Hunting Camps on the Salmon River 1 Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. I am Mark Rey, Natural Resources and Environment Under Secretary for the United States Department of Agriculture. I am here today to provide the Administration’s comments on S. 391—Wild Sky Wilderness Act of 2003 and S. 1003—Outfitter Hunting Camps on the Salmon River. S. 391—The Wild Sky Wilderness Act of 2003 S. 391 would create approximately 106,000 acres of additional wilderness on the Mt. Baker- Snoqualmie National Forest in the State of Washington. It directs the Secretary to assure adequate access to private in-holdings within the Wild Sky Wilderness and establish a trail plan for hiking and equestrian trails within and adjacent to the wilderness. The bill authorizes the use of helicopter access to construct and maintain a joint Forest Service and Snohomish County repeater site to provide improved communication for safety, health, and emergency services. S. 391 also requires the Secretary to exchange specified lands with the Chelan County Public Utility District if the District offers to the Secretary approximately 371.8 acres within the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest, in exchange for a permanent easement, including helicopter access, consistent with such levels as used as of the date of this bill's enactment, to maintain an existing snotel site on 1.82 acres on the Wenatchee National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Sky Wilderness Proposal: Politics, Process, and Participation in Wilderness Designation
    THE WILD SKY WILDERNESS PROPOSAL: POLITICS, PROCESS, AND PARTICIPATION IN WILDERNESS DESIGNATION A Thesis Presented by KASSIA C. RANDZIO Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTERS OF SCIENCE May 2008 Geography THE WILD SKY WILDERNESS PROPOSAL: POLITICS, PROCESS, AND PARTICIPATION IN WILDERNESS DESIGNATION A Thesis Presented by KASSIA C. RANDZIO Approved as to style and content by: ______________________________________________ Stan Stevens, Chair ______________________________________________ Piper Gaubatz, Member ______________________________________________ Laurie Brown, Department Head Geosciences ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the people of the Sky Valley and the Skykomish Ranger District employees who have allowed me to become familiar with Wild Sky, the Forest Service, and the region as a whole. This research is largely based on interviews with the many people interested in the outcome of the Wild Sky Wilderness debate, and I greatly appreciate their willingness to spend time talking with me about the proposal, public involvement, Sky Valley history, and visions for the Valley’s future. Finally, thank you to Stan Stevens and Piper Gaubatz for the many hours they have spent reading and editing my work. iii ABSTRACT THE WILD SKY WILDERNESS PROPOSAL: POLITICS, PROCESS, AND PARTICIPATION IN WILDERNESS DESIGNATION MAY 2008 KASSIA C. RANDZIO B.A., KENYON COLLEGE M.S., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Directed by: Professor Stan Stevens Wild Sky, a proposed wilderness in Washington State, has been a source of local contention since its inception. Drawing on the theories of political ecology, international conservation, and actor-based politics, this research seeks to understand the process of public participation in wilderness designation, the arguments both for and against Wild Sky, and how the wilderness proposal process could be improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Trailtalkback
    trailtalkback Creating Ideal Trails and protecting wildlife habitats by Ed Henderson and Rick McGuire Baring from Beckler Peak. Photo by Joseph Neal/U.S. Forest Service In the last issue, in our column Trail Talk, we ran an article about Cascades go to remote places, and it is not hard to find a place for the overcrowding of trails. In this issue, we are giving two members a multi-day backpack. With ever-worsening traffic, and changes of the North Cascades Conservation Council (NCCC) a chance in lifestyles and hiking preferences, the need now is for places to respond. Like all of our articles, the opinions expressed in that make attractive destinations for day hikes. these columns are those of the authors, and do not necessarily We asked ourselves the not very hard question of what would represent views of The Mountaineers. With that, we are excited to make an “ideal” trail? Several existing examples jumped out, encourage fellow members of the outdoor community to discuss including Rattlesnake Ledge and Little Si. To get the most bang and even debate their views (in a friendly fashion of course). After for the buck, a trail should gain maybe one to two thousand feet, all, the wild nearby is not just something that we explore once in a a level of effort that does not demand great athleticism, but while. It’s a place in our hearts that we cherish, love and protect. enough to give some exercise and a feeling of accomplishment. -Suzanne Gerber, Publications Manager More elevation gain is fine but it’s good to have an intermediate As longtime hikers and explorers who think a lot about trails in the destination if a trail gains much more than two thousand feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Resolution Honoring Patrick Goldsworthy Patrick Goldsworthy Served the Sierra Club Long and Well. He Was a Founder Of
    Board Resolution Honoring Patrick Goldsworthy Patrick Goldsworthy served the Sierra Club long and well. He was a founder of the Club’s Northwest Chapter, and of allied regional environmental organizations, notably the North Cascades Conservation Council (NCCC). Having joined the Club in Berkeley, he moved to Seattle, where he soon heard about illegal logging being allowed by the superintendent within Olympic National Park. He went to take photographs and helped stop the logging. His involvement with the Olympic Park Associates gave him the model for the NCCC. Most importantly of Pat’s long involvement in conservation work, for us and for all Americans—indeed, to the world—Pat led the NCCC’s conservation campaign, first for establishment of the Glacier Peak Wilderness in 1960, then for the Wilderness Act in 1964, and then the campaign to preserve one of the most iconic of our national parks: the North Cascades National Park. When Secretary of the Interior Stewart Udall visited Seattle for the 1962 World’s Fair, a colleague urged Pat not to bother him with North Cascades advocacy. Not Pat: armed with maps, he waylaid Udall at a reception and laid out the case for the park. Between 1963 and 1965 a joint National Park Service-Forest Service study laid the ground-work for establishing a North Cascades National Park and adjacent large conservation units. In 1968, Congress passed the North Cascades Act. While not perfect—none are— the Act represented an important and vital start for conservation in the North Cascades. The Act, established the 684,000-acre North Cascades National Park Complex, that included the Ross Lake and Lake Chelan National Recreation Areas, the new Pasayten Wilderness, and additions to the existing Glacier Peak Wilderness—over 1,200,000 acres in all.
    [Show full text]