DOCSLIB.ORG

Wildlife Discipline Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wildlife Discipline Report Wildlife Discipline Report Index-Galena Road MP 6.4-6.9 Environmental Assessment Prepared by: Terri Hawke Snohomish County Public Works December 2015 Title VI and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information: It is Snohomish County’s policy to assure that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be discriminated against under any County sponsored program or activity. For questions regarding Snohomish County Public Works’ Title VI Program, or for interpreter or translation services for non-English speakers, or otherwise making materials available in an alternate format, contact the Department Title VI Coordinator via e-mail at [email protected] or phone 425-388-6660. Hearing/speech impaired may call 711. Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 9 2 Project Description .............................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Proposed design standards ......................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Design Features ........................................................................................................................... 13 3. Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 16 3.1 Methods of Analysis .................................................................................................................... 16 4 Affected Environment ......................................................................................................................... 18 4.1 General Habitat Characteristics .................................................................................................. 18 4.2 Wildlife Study Area Habitats and Species .................................................................................. 19 4.2.1 Riparian Zone ...................................................................................................................... 19 4.2.2 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................. 20 4.2.3 Upland Forest ...................................................................................................................... 21 4.2.4 Wildlife Corridors and Connectivity ................................................................................... 22 4.3 Special Status Wildlife Species in Study Area ........................................................................... 24 4.3.1 Presence of Species and Use of Wildlife Habitats in Study Area ....................................... 24 5 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................................ 43 5.1 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 43 5.2 Build Alternative ......................................................................................................................... 45 5.2.1 Temporary Effects from Construction ................................................................................ 45 5.2.2 Permanent Effects of Project ............................................................................................... 47 6 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts ............................................................................................................ 53 7 References .......................................................................................................................................... 54 Index-Galena Road MP 6.4-6.9 Wildlife Discipline Report Snohomish County Public Works December 2015 1 Attachment A Photos of Project Area and Wildlife Sign Attachment B Area Impact Plan Sheets Attachment C Species List Attachment D U.S. Forest Service Aquatic Conservation Strategy Index-Galena Road MP 6.4-6.9 Wildlife Discipline Report Snohomish County Public Works December 2015 2 Executive Summary Project Description Snohomish County proposes to relocate approximately one mile of Index-Galena Road from milepost 6.4-6.9. The road is located in T28N R10E in sections 35 and 36. Index-Galena Road parallels the North Fork Skykomish River and a portion of it damaged by high river flows is presently located within the river channel. The proposed project would shift the project area roadway alignment out of the river channel to the south and establish a relocated roadway upslope from the existing damaged roadway. The alignment would transition from the existing Index Galena Road approximately 200 feet east from Trout Creek Bridge #494 (near Milepost 6.1). The relocation would enable the roadway to be elevated above the 100-year flood elevation and channel migration zone for most of the project length and would be landward of the river channel that has formed in the existing roadway alignment. Culverts would be constructed where the roadway crosses non-fish bearing streams and drainage areas. A concrete box culvert vented ford crossing (culvert like structure with potentially a removable top to allow for removal of deposited materials) would be installed in proximity to Station 29+00. The culverts would be sized to convey the 100-year flow and associated debris. A bridge would be constructed over the fish-bearing stream and associated wetland near the north end of the project. Asphalt and other debris would be removed from the river and adjacent riparian areas where the damaged existing roadway is presently located. The decommissioned roadway would then be restored with duff soils salvaged from the project site and planted with ecologically appropriate native species to provide a forested riparian corridor adjacent to the North Fork Skykomish River. In areas where the river flows over the old roadway, roadway debris will be removed where feasible to allow for natural stream channel processes. Methodology Prior to undertaking the field investigation for this report, several sources of existing information were checked for information on potential and known wildlife species and habitats that may be found in the study area. Several site visits to assess wildlife habitat and wildlife presence, and impacts to the habitat were conducted during 2011, 2012, and 2013. Affected Environment The study area is part of the North Cascades physiographic region. The North Cascades mountain range extends from British Columbia south to the Snoqualmie Pass area. The North Cascades consist of jagged peaks with numerous glaciers. This area was formed through a variety of geomorphologic processes including, glacially-carved valleys, colliding terranes, and volcanic activity. Mountain peaks over 10,000 feet steeply plunge to lower elevations of 500 Index-Galena Road MP 6.4-6.9 Wildlife Discipline Report Snohomish County Public Works December 2015 3 feet. The major river valleys include the Snoqualmie, Skykomish, Snohomish, Stillaguamish, Skagit, and Nooksack, which all flow into Puget Sound. The project lies within the North Fork Skykomish River drainage. Environmental Consequences Temporary and permanent impacts would occur throughout the riparian area, mature upland forest, streams, and wetlands. Parts of two wetlands would be permanently filled. The proposed bridge would also shade a small section of wetland. Seven seasonal non-fish bearing streams would be conveyed in culverts and one perennial non-fish bearing stream would flow through a culvert at an armored crossing. Mature trees would be removed to accommodate the relocated road and construction related access to construct walls and rock-filled slopes. Approximately 12.2 acres of mature mixed forest would be cleared. Of this, total approximately 3.3 acres would be permanently impacted for the relocated road alignment roadway prism. Construction related impacts would result in approximately 8.9 acres of long-term temporary buffer impact that would be restored after construction is completed. The entire project area is within U.S. Forest Service designated riparian reserves that are located in the North Fork Skykomish River valley. In addition to trees and understory shrubs, habitat elements within the forest that would be removed include stumps, logs, snags, and boulders. The primary wildlife species that may be affected by this change would be amphibians (including western toads), reptiles, Pacific wrens, bats, pine martens, other small to medium mammals (e.g. bobcat), and several neotropical migrant species and resident birds. Nesting and/or foraging habitat for forest interior birds such as tanagers, thrushes, spotted owls, and Pacific wrens would be lost by clearing. Their nests in adjacent areas would also be more susceptible to predators, such as Stellar’s jays, due to the increased edge effect created by clearing. Short-term temporary loss of nesting areas for neotropical birds and thermal cover for a variety of species would be replaced by the planting of native trees and shrubs in the cleared areas adjacent to the roadway and in the riparian areas along the river. Planting areas in the riparian corridor along the river would provide some protection
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geology and Structural Evolution of the Foss River-Deception Creek Area, Cascade Mountains, Washington
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF James William McDougall for the degree of Master of Science in Geology presented on Lune, icnct Title: GEOLOGY AND STRUCTURALEVOLUTION OF THE FOSS RIVER-DECEPTION CREEK AREA,CASCADE MOUNTAINS, WASHINGTOV, Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: Robert S. Yekis Southwest of Stevens Pass, Washington,immediately west of the crest of the Cascade Range, pre-Tertiaryrocks include the Chiwaukum Schist, dominantly biotite-quartzschist characterized by a polyphase metamorphic history,that correlates with schistose basement east of the area of study.Pre-Tertiary Easton Schist, dominated by graphitic phyllite, is principallyexposed in a horst on Tonga Ridge, however, it also occurs eastof the horst.Altered peridotite correlated to Late Jurassic IngallsComplex crops out on the western margin of the Mount Stuart uplift nearDeception Pass. The Mount Stuart batholith of Late Cretaceous age,dominantly granodiorite to tonalite, and its satellite, the Beck lerPeak stock, intrude Chiwaukum Schist, Easton Schist, andIngalls Complex. Tertiary rocks include early Eocene Swauk Formation, a thick sequence of fluviatile polymictic conglomerateand arkosic sandstone that contains clasts resembling metamorphic and plutonic basement rocks in the northwestern part of the thesis area.The Swauk Formation lacks clasts of Chiwaukum Schist that would be ex- pected from source areas to the east and northeast.The Oligocene (?) Mount Daniel volcanics, dominated by altered pyroclastic rocks, in- trude and unconformably overlie the Swauk Formation.The
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Geologic Investigations Series I-1963, Pamphlet
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I-1963 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE SKYKOMISH RIVER 30- BY 60 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON By R.W. Tabor, V.A. Frizzell, Jr., D.B. Booth, R.B. Waitt, J.T. Whetten, and R.E. Zartman INTRODUCTION From the eastern-most edges of suburban Seattle, the Skykomish River quadrangle stretches east across the low rolling hills and broad river valleys of the Puget Lowland, across the forested foothills of the North Cascades, and across high meadowlands to the bare rock peaks of the Cascade crest. The quadrangle straddles parts of two major river systems, the Skykomish and the Snoqualmie Rivers, which drain westward from the mountains to the lowlands (figs. 1 and 2). In the late 19th Century mineral deposits were discovered in the Monte Cristo, Silver Creek and the Index mining districts within the Skykomish River quadrangle. Soon after came the geologists: Spurr (1901) studied base- and precious- metal deposits in the Monte Cristo district and Weaver (1912a) and Smith (1915, 1916, 1917) in the Index district. General geologic mapping was begun by Oles (1956), Galster (1956), and Yeats (1958a) who mapped many of the essential features recognized today. Areas in which additional studies have been undertaken are shown on figure 3. Our work in the Skykomish River quadrangle, the northwest quadrant of the Wenatchee 1° by 2° quadrangle, began in 1975 and is part of a larger mapping project covering the Wenatchee quadrangle (fig. 1). Tabor, Frizzell, Whetten, and Booth have primary responsibility for bedrock mapping and compilation.
    [Show full text]
  • Index-Galena Road Milepost 6.4 – Milepost 6.9
    INDEX-GALENA ROAD MILEPOST 6.4 – MILEPOST 6.9 Snohomish County, Washington Finding of No Significant Impact April 2017 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) assure full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 and related statues by prohibiting discrimination based on race, color, national origin and sex in provision of benefits and services. For more information about Title VI, please call the WSDOT Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7098. Page 2 Finding Of No Significant Impact Index-Galena Road Milepost 6.4-6.9 Description of Proposed Action The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and Snohomish County Public Works, issued an Environmental Assessment (EA) on September 19, 2016. The project will construct a relocated roadway that will extend from an area in proximity to the lower washout at Index-Galena Road Milepost 6.4 to an area in proximity to the upper washout at Milepost 6.9. The roadway will be relocated landward from the North Fork Skykomish River outside of the floodplain and channel migration zone. The roadway is located in unincorporated Snohomish County, Washington upstream from the town of Index. The relocated roadway will re-establish roadway connectivity on Index-Galena Road for residences, emergency service providers, recreationists, and land managed by the U. S Forest Service. The improvements will include shifting the existing roadway alignment to the south away from the river to establish a relocated roadway upslope from the existing damaged roadway.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Analysis Template
    Miller-Foss Watershed Analysis References Baenen, J. 1981. Stillaguamish, Snohomish, Snoqualmie, and Duwamish. In: Blukis Onat, A.R.; Hollenbeck, J.L. (eds.) Inventory of Native American Religious Use, Practices, Localities, and Resources.. Seattle, WA: Institute of Cooperative Research. 396-471. Bilby, E.; J. Ward. 1989. Changes in characteristics and function of woody debris with increasing size of streams in Western Washington. Transcript. Portland, OR: American Fisheries Society: 118: 363-378. Bisson, P.A.; Bilby, R.E.; Bryant, M.D.; Dolloff, C.A.; Grette, G..B.; House, R.A.; Murphy, M.L.; Koski, K.V.; Sedell, J.R. 1987. Large woody debris in forested streams in the Pacific Northwest: Past, present and future. 143-190. In: Salo, E.O.; and Cundy, T.; ed. Streamside management: Forestry and fishery interactions. Seattle, WA: College of Forest Resources. University of Washington. Contribution no. 57. Blukis Onat, A.R.; Hollenbeck, J.L. (eds.). 1981. Inventory of religious use, practices, localities, and resources. Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest. Seattle, WA: Institute of Cooperative Research. Booth; D.B. Goldstein, B. 1994. Patterns and processes of landscape development by the Puget lobe ice sheet. In: Lasmanis E.; Cheney, R., eds.. 1994. Regional Geology of Washington State, Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources, bulletin no. 80, 227. Bortleson, G..; Dion, N.; McConnel, J.; and Nelson. L. 1976. Reconnaissance data on lakes in Washington, vol. 2 (King and Snohomish Counties). Washington State Dept. of Ecology and U.S. Department of the Interior (USDI), Geological Survey, water-supply, bulletin no. 43(2). Brown, J.K.et al. 2001. Coarse woody debris and succession in the recovering forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Gold and Fish Pamphlet: Rules for Mineral Prospecting and Placer Mining
    WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Gold and Fish Rules for Mineral Prospecting and Placer Mining May 2021 WDFW | 2020 GOLD and FISH - 2nd Edition Table of Contents Mineral Prospecting and Placer Mining Rules 1 Agencies with an Interest in Mineral Prospecting 1 Definitions of Terms 8 Mineral Prospecting in Freshwater Without Timing Restrictions 12 Mineral Prospecting in Freshwaters With Timing Restrictions 14 Mineral Prospecting on Ocean Beaches 16 Authorized Work Times 17 Penalties 42 List of Figures Figure 1. High-banker 9 Figure 2. Mini high-banker 9 Figure 3. Mini rocker box (top view and bottom view) 9 Figure 4. Pan 10 Figure 5. Power sluice/suction dredge combination 10 Figure 6. Cross section of a typical redd 10 Fig u re 7. Rocker box (top view and bottom view) 10 Figure 8. Sluice 11 Figure 9. Spiral wheel 11 Figure 10. Suction dredge . 11 Figure 11. Cross section of a typical body of water, showing areas where excavation is not permitted under rules for mineral prospecting without timing restrictions Dashed lines indicate areas where excavation is not permitted 12 Figure 12. Permitted and prohibited excavation sites in a typical body of water under rules for mineral prospecting without timing restrictions Dashed lines indicate areas where excavation is not permitted 12 Figure 13. Limits on excavating, collecting, and removing aggregate on stream banks 14 Figure 14. Excavating, collecting, and removing aggregate within the wetted perimeter is not permitted 1 4 Figure 15. Cross section of a typical body of water showing unstable slopes, stable areas, and permissible or prohibited excavation sites under rules for mineral prospecting with timing restrictions Dashed lines indicates areas where excavation is not permitted 15 Figure 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Sky Wilderness Air Quality Report, 2012
    Wild Sky Wilderness Air Quality Report Wilderness ID: 442 Wilderness Name: Wild Sky Wilderness Wild Sky Wilderness Air Quality Report National Forest: Snoqualmie National Forest State: WA Counties: King, Snohomish General Location: Central Washington Cascade Range Acres: 105,561 Thursday, May 17, 2012 Page 1 of 5 Wild Sky Wilderness Air Quality Report Wilderness ID: 442 Wilderness Name: Wild Sky Wilderness Wilderness Categories Information Specific to this Wilderness Year Established 2008 Establishment Notes The Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 Designation Clean Air Act Class 2 Administrative Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Unique Landscape Features The Wild Sky Wilderness is the newest addition to a 2.6 million acre wilderness complex that straddles the rugged North Cascade Range from Canada to Snoqualmie Pass. The southwestern portion of the wilderness is only 25 miles from Puget Sound and adjacent to the fast growing communities of the Skykomish River Valley. The western part of the wilderness is characterized by very steep slopes and dramatic local relief. For example, from the North Fork Skykomish River near the town of Index, the terrain rises from about 600 feet above sea level to over 6,000 feet, on Gunn Peak, in less than 3 miles. Annual precipitation in this area runs between 150 to 200 inches annually, most of it coming as snow during the wet winter months. Runoff from the rain and snow feed streams that drop into the deep valleys below. This source of clean water is important to salmon which spawn in these reaches and provide exciting spring raft trips on the Skykomish River.
    [Show full text]
  • Trailtalkback
    trailtalkback Creating Ideal Trails and protecting wildlife habitats by Ed Henderson and Rick McGuire Baring from Beckler Peak. Photo by Joseph Neal/U.S. Forest Service In the last issue, in our column Trail Talk, we ran an article about Cascades go to remote places, and it is not hard to find a place for the overcrowding of trails. In this issue, we are giving two members a multi-day backpack. With ever-worsening traffic, and changes of the North Cascades Conservation Council (NCCC) a chance in lifestyles and hiking preferences, the need now is for places to respond. Like all of our articles, the opinions expressed in that make attractive destinations for day hikes. these columns are those of the authors, and do not necessarily We asked ourselves the not very hard question of what would represent views of The Mountaineers. With that, we are excited to make an “ideal” trail? Several existing examples jumped out, encourage fellow members of the outdoor community to discuss including Rattlesnake Ledge and Little Si. To get the most bang and even debate their views (in a friendly fashion of course). After for the buck, a trail should gain maybe one to two thousand feet, all, the wild nearby is not just something that we explore once in a a level of effort that does not demand great athleticism, but while. It’s a place in our hearts that we cherish, love and protect. enough to give some exercise and a feeling of accomplishment. -Suzanne Gerber, Publications Manager More elevation gain is fine but it’s good to have an intermediate As longtime hikers and explorers who think a lot about trails in the destination if a trail gains much more than two thousand feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Test Herrera Report Template
    APPENDIX B South Fork Skykomish River Salmon Habitat Information Review and Future Studies Scoping Summary Report SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER SALMON HABITAT INFORMATION REVIEW AND FUTURE STUDIES SCOPING SUMMARY REPORT KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Prepared for King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources Division and USDA Forest Service Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Prepared by Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH BASIN SALMON HABITAT INFORMATION REVIEW AND FUTURE STUDIES SCOPING SUMMARY REPORT KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Prepared for King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources Division 201 S. Jackson Street, Suite 600 Seattle, Washington 98104 and USDA Forest Service Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Prepared by Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. 2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1100 Seattle, Washington 98121 Telephone: 206/441-9080 April 30, 2013 CONTENTS Project Objectives and Scope ............................................................................ 1 Project Setting ........................................................................................ 1 Geographic Scope of the Project ................................................................... 3 Methods for Data Review............................................................................. 4 Data and Information Review Results ................................................................... 9 Information Request Contacts and Status ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Snohomish County Hiking Guide
    2015- 2016 TO OUTDOOR ADVENTURE! 30 GREAT HIKES • DRIVING DIRECTIONS MAPS • ACCOMMODATIONS • LOCAL RESOURCES photo by Scott Morris PB | www.snohomish.org www.snohomish.org | 1 SCTB Print - Hiking Guide Cover 5.5” x 8.5” - Full Color 5-2015 HIKE NAME 1 Hike subtitle ROUNDTRIP m ile ELEVATION GAIN m ile HIKING SEASON m ile MAP m ile NOTES m ile DRIVING DIRECTIONS m ile CONTACT INFO m ile Hard to imagine, but one of the finest beaches River Delta. A fairly large lagoon has developed on in all of Snohomish County is just minutes from the island where you can watch for sandpipers, downtown Everett! And this two mile long sandy osprey, kingfishers, herons, finches, ducks, and expanse was created by man, not nature. Beginning more. in the 1890s, the Army Corp of Engineers built a You won’t be able to walk around the island as the jetty just north of Port Gardiner—then commenced channel side contains no beach. But the beach to dredge a channel. The spoils along with silt and on Possession Sound is wide and smooth and you sedimentation from the Snohomish River eventually can easily walk 4 to 5 miles going from tip to tip. created an island. Sand accumulated from tidal Soak up views of the Olympic Mountains; Whidbey, influences, birds arrived and nested, and plants Camano, and Gedney Islands; and downtown Everett soon colonized the island. against a backdrop of Cascades Mountains. In the 1980s the Everett Parks and Recreation Department began providing passenger ferry service to the island. Over 50,000 folks visit this sandy gem each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Times When Spawning Or Incubating Salmonids Are Least Likely to Be Within Washington State Freshwaters
    Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife TIMES WHEN SPAWNING OR INCUBATING SALMONIDS ARE LEAST LIKELY TO BE WITHIN WASHINGTON STATE FRESHWATERS June 1, 2018 Page 1 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) biologists will use this table as a starting point when they consider timing restrictions for any hydraulic project for which they will issue a written HPA. WDFW developed this table based on the general conditions and fish life histories present within broad reaches of stream or sub- basins. Based on the site-specific conditions, circumstances, work proposed, and fish life stages present, timing restrictions for individual hydraulic project sites may differ from those upon which this table was based; therefore alternative work times may be appropriate for some projects. The table identifies times when salmonid eggs and fry are least likely to be incubating within stream gravels. In the case of some large streams, such as the Columbia and Snake Rivers, outmigration timing of smolts was also considered. Check the listing for the county in which in-water work will occur to identify times that may avoid impact to spawning and incubating fish life. Biologists will also consider such things as the expected impact of construction activities, equipment type and access, life history stages of all species of fish life present, presence or absence of spawning habitat and incubating fish at or near the project site, weather (heavy rain, snow, frozen soils), work site containment, wastewater management, best management practices proposed by the project proponent, mitigation measures volunteered or imposed upon the project, and other circumstances and conditions when permitting in-water work.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation History of the Alpine Lakes Part I Bill Beyers & Don Parks1
    The Newsletter of the Alpine Lakes Protection Society (ALPS) 2016 Issue No. 2 Conservation History of the Alpine Lakes Part I Bill Beyers & Don Parks1 While 2016 marks the 40th anniversary of the passage of the Alpine Lakes Management Act, proposals for preservation of the region date back almost another 40 years. In fact, events critical to conservation in the Alpine Lakes Region date back to 1864 with the authorization of the Northern Pacific Railroad (NPR) to build a transcontinental railroad that could receive a federal land grant. The resulting land ownership pattern, coupled with the extremely high environmental values, have measurably added to the challenge of efforts to protect the area. Figure 1 Land Ownership Classification Pattern Prior to Settlement of NPR Land Claims in 1940. Northern Pacific Land Grant Source: Cascade Mountains Study, by Washington State Planning Council, dated May 1940. The land ownerships (1864-1941) depicted are as of 1937. The NPR expected to receive title to every other square mile This pattern included all of the Wilderness. There were several (odd numbered sections) 40 Alpine Lakes region (Figure 1; variations in the selection miles north and south from uncolored sections promised to procedures that evolved over NPR). the track route that crossed the Continued on page 2 Cascades at Stampede Pass, as In order to acquire the deeds to well as along track that went all this land the NPR was required through the Columbia River to complete several steps including Also in this issue: Gorge and north to Tacoma surveying. The Secretary of and Seattle.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Document
    ALPINE LAKES PROTECTION SOCIETY AMERICAN RIVERS AMERICAN WHITEWATER CONSERVATION NORTHWEST FRIENDS OF HEYBROOK RIDGE FRIENDS OF WILD SKY SIERRA CLUB – WASHINGTON STATE CHAPTER THE MOUNTAINEERS NORTH CASCADES CONSERVATION COUNCIL PILCHUCK AUDUBON SOCIETY THE WILDERNES SOCIETY WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION WASHINGTON WILD July 26, 2013 Todd Griffin, Geothermal Team Leader Mt. Baker Snoqualmie National Forest 2930 Wetmore Avenue, Suite 3A Everett, WA 98201 Submitted electronically to: [email protected] Re: Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed Skykomish Geothermal Consent to Lease project Dear Mr. Griffin, On behalf of the 13 undersigned organizations and the tens of thousands of forest users, Washington residents and federal taxpayers who they represent, we are submitting written comments on the Environmental Assessment for the proposed Skykomish Geothermal Consent to Lease project. Our organizations support efforts to responsibly develop renewable energy resources as an alternative toward continued heavy reliance on non-renewable fossil fuels. Such endeavors are one of many potential solutions to the increasing problem of climate change. We recognize that geothermal energy has important potential benefits in this regard as its development is now being pioneered here in Washington State. However, we also feel strongly that renewable energy development is not appropriate everywhere, or at any cost. For example, areas that boast some of the last best wildlife habitat and connectivity or wild intact ancient forests are not compatible with geothermal development or even certain levels of exploratory drilling. In addition, landscapes where significant resources have been invested to restore watersheds for healthy fish populations and clean and safe drinking water significantly bias a cost/benefit analysis against development.
    [Show full text]