DOCSLIB.ORG

How to Build a Small Plasma Focus - Recipes and Tricks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How to Build a Small Plasma Focus - Recipes and Tricks 2370-12 School and Training Course on Dense Magnetized Plasma as a Source of Ionizing Radiations, their Diagnostics and Applications 8 - 12 October 2012 How to build a small Plasma Focus - Recipes and tricks Leopoldo Soto Comision Chilena de Energia Nuclear Casilla 188-D, Santiago Chile Center for Research and Applications in Plasma Physics and Pulsed Power, P4 Chile How to build a small Plasma Focus Recipes and tricks Leopoldo Soto Comisión Chilena de Energía Nuclear Casilla 188-D, Santiago, Chile and Center for Research and Applications in Plasma Physics and Pulsed Power, P4, Chile [email protected] School and Training on Dense Magnetized Plasmas L. Soto, Thermonuclear Plasma Department ICTP, Trieste, Italy, 8-12 October, 2012 Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission To build a plasma focus it is necessary to defin the followings parameters: - Energy ? - Capacitor, C? - Voltage operation, V0? - Inductance, L? - Current peak, I0 ? - Anode radius, a? - Effective anode length (over the insulator), z? - Operational pressure, p? - Insulator length, lins ? - Cathode radius, b? School and Training on Dense Magnetized Plasmas L. Soto, Thermonuclear Plasma Department ICTP, Trieste, Italy, 8-12 October, 2012 Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission Why and for what a small PF? To do plasma research To study plasma dynamics and intabilities To study the X-ray emmited To study the neutrons emmited To study plasma jets … School and Training on Dense Magnetized Plasmas L. Soto, Thermonuclear Plasma Department ICTP, Trieste, Italy, 8-12 October, 2012 Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission Why and for what a small PF? To develop a non radioactive source To do flash radiography and non destructive testing To do litography To develop a portable non-radiactive source of neutrons for field applications … To teach experimental plasma physics and nuclear techniques, to train students School and Training on Dense Magnetized Plasmas L. Soto, Thermonuclear Plasma Department ICTP, Trieste, Italy, 8-12 October, 2012 Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission You must make a decision about that PF you want Free decision about energy and voltage operation A motived decision, because you have a suitable set of capacitors (somebody gift to you or you found its in a old storeroom or laboratory). Some kV and tens of nF - few μF School and Training on Dense Magnetized Plasmas L. Soto, Thermonuclear Plasma Department ICTP, Trieste, Italy, 8-12 October, 2012 Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission Motivation A plasma focus is a self-scale plasma device Devices operated in a wide range of bank energy (0.1 J – 1 MJ) have the same phenomenology L. Soto, C. Pavez, J. Moreno, A. Tarifeño and F. Veloso, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19 ,055017 (2010) School and Training on Dense Magnetized Plasmas L. Soto, Thermonuclear Plasma Department ICTP, Trieste, Italy, 8-12 October, 2012 Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission Motivation, Scaling rules Scaling parameters allow to reproduce similar phenomenology in devices operatedinawiderangeofbankenergy(0.1J–1MJ) L. Soto, C. Pavez, J. Moreno, A. Tarifeño and F. Veloso, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19 ,055017 (2010) School and Training on Dense Magnetized Plasmas L. Soto, Thermonuclear Plasma Department ICTP, Trieste, Italy, 8-12 October, 2012 Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission Motivation Scaling law for neutron yield, Y, to E<1kJ 200J FMPF-1 6 ] kA PF-400J 125J 9 I : 4,5 [ -4 0 I x 1 .43 8 5 Y = log Y PF-50J 4 PF-50J 1,7 1,8 1,9 2,0 2,1 log I 200J 6 125J FMPF-1 PF-400J : J] 8 [E 2,3 E .43 5 2 Y = PF-50J log Y 4 PF-50J 1,6 1,8 2,0 2,2 2,4 2,6 log E L. Soto et al. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19 ,055017 (2010) School and Training on Dense Magnetized Plasmas L. Soto, Thermonuclear Plasma Department ICTP, Trieste, Italy, 8-12 October, 2012 Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission Motivation Scaling parameters allow to reproduce similar phenomenology in devices operated in a wide range of bank energy (0.1 J – 1 MJ) Similarities and differences in devices from 1MJ to 0.1J Similarities ∼ ∼ The pinch radius and pinch length scale with the anode radius, and rp (0.1-0.2) a, zp (0.8-1) a ∼ ∼ 24 -3 The mean value of the pinch ion density scale with the filling gas density, and <n> 18n0 5x10 m . The drive parameter, the energy density parameter and the energy per mass parameter have practically the same value for any plasma focus experimentally optimized for neutron emission. This implies that: The magnetic field at the pinch radius has a value of the order of 30 to 40 T for anyyp PF experimentally yp optimized for neutron emission. The Alfvén speed in the pinch has practically the same value in any PF experimentally optimized for neutron emission. Any PF device with a similar drive parameter, energy density parameter and ion density, has a temperature of the same order. Thus, an experimental measure of temperature in a particular PF could be used to estimate the temperature of any PF experimentally optimized for neutron emission. The temperature was measured by other authors in a plasma focus of some kJ by means of spectroscopy techniques in ∼ 0.6 - 1 keV. Then, it is possible to assume that the temperature in any plasma focus operating properly, included the smallest ones like the PF-50J and the Nanofocus, has a temperature of that order. L. Soto, C. Pavez, J. Moreno, A. Tarifeño and F. Veloso, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19 ,055017 (2010) “Drive parameter of neutron-optimized dense plasma foci”, D. Klir and L. Soto, accepted in in IEEE TPS to e published in December 2012) School and Training on Dense Magnetized Plasmas L. Soto, Thermonuclear Plasma Department ICTP, Trieste, Italy, 8-12 October, 2012 Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission Motivation Similarities and differences in devices from 1MJ to 0.1J Differences The plasma focus is a self scale device. However, the stability regime, in which a particular PF device lives, depends on the energy of the device and of the size of the anode radius. Large PF devices (hundred of kJ and MJ) are in the ideal MHD region, and are unstable. On the contrary, the smallest device with stored energy less than 1J, Nanofocus, could be presents enhanced stability by means of resistive effects. PF devices in the range of hundred and tens of joules could be present enhanced stability by means of LLR effects. γ τ = 1 i i Ωτ = 1 i i / 5 1024 / 10 SPEED2 pinch PF-1000 pinch pinch Different plasma foci that = r = i = r i = r 0 i a 0 aa PF- 360 aa 1 wworkork wiwithth stostoredred eenergynergy = 1021 50kJ - 1MJ S ranging from 0.1 J to 1MJ 1kJ - 50kJ 7kJ 100J - 1kJ Fuego Nuevo II are plotted in the diagram m] PACO 4 1J - 100J 18 UNU/ICTP-PFF 10 < 1J for Z-pinch stability given [A PF-400J Ideal MHD 200J by Haines and Coppins FMPF-1 pinch r PF-50J 125J 15 4 I 10 PF-50J 1012 NF 0.25J NF 0.1J N α E/a 109 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 -1 N [m ] L. Soto, C. Pavez, J. Moreno, A. Tarifeño and F. Veloso, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19 ,055017 (2010) School and Training on Dense Magnetized Plasmas L. Soto, Thermonuclear Plasma Department ICTP, Trieste, Italy, 8-12 October, 2012 Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission Motivation A hundred joules PF as a neutron source, PF-400J 6 1.2x10 20 1.0x106 10 PF-400J 5 8.0x10 0 Voltage (kV) Y 6.0x105 0.8 4.0x105 0.4 A/s) 5 12 2.0x10 0.0 -0.4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 dI/dt (10 dI/dt Pressure (mbar) 9 0 8 -1 7 -2 FM2 (volt) FM2 6 -3 5 4 0.0 3 -0.4 2 68 ns FM2 (volt) FM2 -0.8 1 ΔL = 1.5 m SHOT84 270603 0 0 200 400 600 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 t (ns) energy (MeV) PF-400J P. Silva, J. Moreno, L. Soto, L. Birstein, R. Mayer, and W. Kies, App. Phys. Lett. 83, 3269 (2003) School and Training on Dense Magnetized Plasmas L. Soto, Thermonuclear Plasma Department ICTP, Trieste, Italy, 8-12 October, 2012 Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission Motivation A tens joules PF as a neutron source, PF-50J FM1 at 30.5 cm from the axis FM2 at 78.5 cm from the axis 2,0x104 0,4 dI/dt 4 0,0 1,6x10 -0,4 1,2x104 0 FM1 Y 8,0x103 a. u. a. u. -2 3 0 FM2 4,0x10 -2 Δ t = 22 ns => E = 2.48MeV n 456789 0 100 200 300 400 Pressure (mbar) time (ns) Average over 20 shots Neutrons maximum mean energy of 2.7 MeV, dispersion of 1.8 MeV L. Soto, P. Silva, J. Moreno, M. Zambra, W. Kies, R. E. Mayer, A. Clausse, L. Altamirano, C. Pavez, and L. Huerta “Demonstration of neutron production in a table top pinch plasma focus device operated at only tens of joules”. J. Phys. D: App. Phys. 41, 205215 (2008) School and Training on Dense Magnetized Plasmas L. Soto, Thermonuclear Plasma Department ICTP, Trieste, Italy, 8-12 October, 2012 Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission Motivation A tens joules PF as a neutron source, PF-50J Lef=6.3mm, ra=3mm, rcat=6.5mm, rcat/ra=2.17, Vc=28.7(8) kV, “Statistical characterization of the reproducibility of neutron emission of small plasma focus devices” A. Tarifeño-Saldivia and L. Soto, Physics of Plasmas 19, 092512 (2012) School and Training on Dense Magnetized Plasmas L.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Simultaneous Ultra-Fast Imaging and Neutron Emission from a Compact Dense Plasma Focus Fusion Device
    instruments Article Simultaneous Ultra-Fast Imaging and Neutron Emission from a Compact Dense Plasma Focus Fusion Device Nathan Majernik, Seth Pree, Yusuke Sakai, Brian Naranjo, Seth Putterman and James Rosenzweig * ID Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; [email protected] (N.M.); [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (Y.S.); [email protected] (B.N.); [email protected] (S.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +310-206-4541 Received: 12 February 2018; Accepted: 5 April 2018; Published: 11 April 2018 Abstract: Recently, there has been intense interest in small dense plasma focus (DPF) devices for use as pulsed neutron and X-ray sources. Although DPFs have been studied for decades and scaling laws for neutron yield versus system discharge current and energy have been established (Milanese, M. et al., Eur. Phys. J. D 2003, 27, 77–81), there are notable deviations at low energies due to contributions from both thermonuclear and beam-target interactions (Schmidt, A. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 1–4). For low energy DPFs (100 s of Joules), other empirical scaling laws have been found (Bures, B.L. et al., Phys. Plasmas 2012, 112702, 1–9). Although theoretical mechanisms to explain this change have been proposed, the cause of this reduced efficiency is not well understood. A new apparatus with advanced diagnostic capabilities allows us to probe this regime, including variants in which a piston gas is employed. Several complementary diagnostics of the pinch dynamics and resulting X-ray neutron production are employed to understand the underlying mechanisms involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Characteristics of the Stabilized Toroidal Pinch Machine, Perhapsatron S-4
    P/2488 USA Operational Characteristics of the Stabilized Toroidal Pinch Machine, Perhapsatron S-4 By J. P. Conner, D. C. H age r m an, J. L. Honsaker, H. J. Karr, J. P. Mize, J. E. Osher, J. A. Phillips and E. J. Stovall Jr. Several investigators1"6 have reported initial success largely inductance-limited and not resistance-limited in stabilizing a pinched discharge through the utiliza- as observed in PS-3. After gas breakdown about 80% tion of an axial Bz magnetic field and conducting of the condenser voltage appears around the secondary, walls, and theoretical work,7"11 with simplifying in agreement with the ratio of source and load induct- assumptions, predicts stabilization under these con- ances. The rate of increase of gas current is at first ditions. At Los Alamos this approach has been large, ~1.3xlOn amp/sec, until the gas current examined in linear (Columbus) and toroidal (Per- contracts to cause an increase in inductance, at which hapsatron) geometries. time the gas current is a good approximation to a sine Perhapsatron S-3 (PS-3), described elsewhere,4 was curve. The gas current maximum is found to rise found to be resistance-limited in that the discharge linearly with primary voltage (Fig. 3), deviating as current did not increase significantly for primary expected at the higher voltages because of saturation vçltages over 12 kv (120 volts/cm). The minor inside of the iron core. diameter of this machine was small, 5.3 cm, and the At the discharge current maximum, the secondary onset of impurity light from wall material in the voltage is not zero, and if one assumes that there is discharge occurred early in the gas current cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Looking Back at Half a Century of Fusion Research Association Euratom-CEA, Centre De
    Looking Back at Half a Century of Fusion Research P. STOTT Association Euratom-CEA, Centre de Cadarache, 13108 Saint Paul lez Durance, France. This article gives a short overview of the origins of nuclear fusion and of its development as a potential source of terrestrial energy. 1 Introduction A hundred years ago, at the dawn of the twentieth century, physicists did not understand the source of the Sun‘s energy. Although classical physics had made major advances during the nineteenth century and many people thought that there was little of the physical sciences left to be discovered, they could not explain how the Sun could continue to radiate energy, apparently indefinitely. The law of energy conservation required that there must be an internal energy source equal to that radiated from the Sun‘s surface but the only substantial sources of energy known at that time were wood or coal. The mass of the Sun and the rate at which it radiated energy were known and it was easy to show that if the Sun had started off as a solid lump of coal it would have burnt out in a few thousand years. It was clear that this was much too shortœœthe Sun had to be older than the Earth and, although there was much controversy about the age of the Earth, it was clear that it had to be older than a few thousand years. The realization that the source of energy in the Sun and stars is due to nuclear fusion followed three main steps in the development of science.
    [Show full text]
  • Revamping Fusion Research Robert L. Hirsch
    Revamping Fusion Research Robert L. Hirsch Journal of Fusion Energy ISSN 0164-0313 Volume 35 Number 2 J Fusion Energ (2016) 35:135-141 DOI 10.1007/s10894-015-0053-y 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science +Business Media New York. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy J Fusion Energ (2016) 35:135–141 DOI 10.1007/s10894-015-0053-y POLICY Revamping Fusion Research Robert L. Hirsch1 Published online: 28 January 2016 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 Abstract A fundamental revamping of magnetic plasma Introduction fusion research is needed, because the current focus of world fusion research—the ITER-tokamak concept—is A practical fusion power system must be economical, virtually certain to be a commercial failure. Towards that publically acceptable, and as simple as possible from a end, a number of technological considerations are descri- regulatory standpoint. In a preceding paper [1] the ITER- bed, believed important to successful fusion research.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixty Years on from ZETA …
    Sixty years on from ZETA … Chris Warrick The Sun … What is powering it? Coal? Lifetime 3,000 years Gravitational Energy? Lifetime 30 million years – Herman Von Helmholtz, Lord Kelvin - mid 1800s The Sun … Suggested the Earth is at least 300 million years old – confirmed by geologists studying rock formations … The Sun … Albert Einstein (Theory of Special Relativity) and Becquerel / Curie’s work on radioactivity – suggested radioactive decay may be the answer … But the Sun comprises hydrogen … The Sun … Arthur Eddington proposed that fusion of hydrogen to make helium must be powering the Sun “If, indeed, the subatomic energy is being freely used to maintain their great furnaces, it seems to bring a little nearer to fulfilment our dream of controlling this latent power for the well-being of the human race – or for its suicide” Cambridge – 1930s Cockcroft Walton accelerator, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge. But huge energy losses and low collisionality Ernest Rutherford : “The energy produced by the breaking down of the atom is a very poor kind of thing . Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.” Oxford – 1940s Peter Thonemann – Clarendon Laboratory, Oxford. ‘Pinch’ experiment in glass, then copper tori. First real experiments in sustaining plasma and magnetically controlling them. Imperial College – 1940s George Thomson / Alan Ware – Imperial College London then Aldermaston. Also pinch experiments, but instabilities started to be observed – especially the rapidly growing kink instability. AERE Harwell Atomic Energy Research Establishment (AERE) Harwell – Hangar 7 picked up fusion research. Fusion is now classified. Kurchatov visit 1956 ZETA ZETA Zero Energy Thermonuclear Apparatus Pinch experiment – but with added toroidal field to help with instabilities and pulsed DC power supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • Stellarator Research Opportunities
    Stellarator Research Opportunities A report of the National Stellarator Coordinating Committee [1] This document is the product of a stellarator community workshop, organized by the National Stellarator Coordinating Committee and referred to as Stellcon, that was held in Cambridge, Massachusetts in February 2016, hosted by MIT. The workshop was widely advertised, and was attended by 40 scientists from 12 different institutions including national labs, universities and private industry, as well as a representative from the Department of Energy. The final section of this document describes areas of community wide consensus that were developed as a result of the discussions held at that workshop. Areas where further study would be helpful to generate a consensus path forward for the US stellarator program are also discussed. The program outlined in this document is directly responsive to many of the strategic priorities of FES as articulated in “Fusion Energy Sciences: A Ten-Year Perspective (2015-2025)” [2]. The natural disruption immunity of the stellarator directly addresses “Elimination of transient events that can be deleterious to toroidal fusion plasma confinement devices” an area of critical importance for the U.S. fusion energy sciences enterprise over the next decade. Another critical area of research “Strengthening our partnerships with international research facilities,” is being significantly advanced on the W7-X stellarator in Germany and serves as a test-bed for development of successful international collaboration on ITER. This report also outlines how materials science as it relates to plasma and fusion sciences, another critical research area, can be carried out effectively in a stellarator. Additionally, significant advances along two of the Research Directions outlined in the report; “Burning Plasma Science: Foundations - Next-generation research capabilities”, and “Burning Plasma Science: Long pulse - Sustainment of Long-Pulse Plasma Equilibria” are proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Polywell Fusion
    Polywell Fusion JAEYOUNG PARK ENERGY MATTER CONVERSION CORPORATION ENN FUSION SYMPOSIUM, APRIL 20 2018 History of EMC2 1985 Energy Matter Conversion Corporation is a US-incorporated, San Diego-based company developing nuclear fusion • 1985: EMC2 founded by the late Dr. Robert Bussard • Polywell technology is based on high pressure magnetic confinement of plasma called the “Wiffle-Ball” and plasma heating with an electrostatic potential well by e-beams • 1992 – 1995: First Polywell device was built with DARPA funding. Successfully demonstrated electrostatic potential well using electron beams. 1995-2013 • 1995 -2013: EMC2 continued R&D efforts utilizing a series of 19 2013 test Polywell devices to demonstrate and examine Wiffle-Ball (WB) plasma confinement backed by the US Navy. • 2013: Successful formation of WB and demonstration of enhanced confinement. • 2014-2017: EMC2 filed two patents, published a peer-reviewed paper, and provided public disclosures of the Polywell technology. 2017 • 2017: EMC2 developed computer code to validate and began optimizing the Polywell technology. 2 Energy Matter Conversion Corporation Conversion Matter Energy EMC2 San Diego Laboratory 3 Energy Matter Conversion Corporation Conversion Matter Energy EMC2 Teams and Collaborations m-wave & laser KU Leuven Power Systems, Magnets Reactor Engineering, Neutral beam injector diagnostics plasma sources 4 Energy Matter Conversion Corporation Conversion Matter Energy Plasma Simulation Particle Diagnostics Neutronics & Modeling Why EMC2 Pursues Polywell Fusion? Lawson Criteria for Polywell Additional Metrics Critical to n* t * T Fusion Energy - High density using stable magnetic - Plasma stability: uncontrolled cusp trap: 10n compared to plasma behaviors degrade reactor tokamak (5x1020 m-3) performance and damage reactor - Sufficient confinement using Wiffle- - Efficient fuel heating allows 2nd Ball (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Redacted %
    EXAMINATION OF THE UNITED STATES DOMESTIC FUSION PROGRAM ARCHW.$ By MASS ACHUSETTS INSTITUTE Lauren A. Merriman I OF IECHNOLOLGY MAY U6 2015 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING I LIBR ARIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2015 Lauren A. Merriman. All Rights Reserved. - The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly Paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author:_ Signature redacted %. Lauren A. Merriman Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering May 22, 2014 Signature redacted Certified by:. Dennis Whyte Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering I'l f 'A Thesis Supervisor Signature redacted Accepted by: Richard K. Lester Professor and Head of the Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering 1 EXAMINATION OF THE UNITED STATES DOMESTIC FUSION PROGRAM By Lauren A. Merriman Submitted to the Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering on May 22, 2014 In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Nuclear Science and Engineering ABSTRACT Fusion has been "forty years away", that is, forty years to implementation, ever since the idea of harnessing energy from a fusion reactor was conceived in the 1950s. In reality, however, it has yet to become a viable energy source. Fusion's promise and failure are both investigated by reviewing the history of the United States domestic fusion program and comparing technological forecasting by fusion scientists, fusion program budget plans, and fusion program budget history.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheared Flow Stabilization of the Z-Pinch
    Thermonuclear Fusion with the Sheared Flow Stabilized Z-Pinch F. Winterberg and L. F. Wanex University of Nevada Reno, Department of Physics / MS 372, Reno, Nevada, 89557, USA ABSTRACT Two basic approaches to producing thermonuclear fusion with a sheared flow stabilized z-pinch are considered. One consists of heating the entire length of the z-pinch column to the required temperatures. The other basic approach considered here involves the concept of fast ignition. A localized "hot-spot" is produced under the proper conditions to ignite a thermonuclear burn wave in the z-pinch plasma. Here we demonstrate that sheared flow stabilization is more efficient in the fast-ignition method with isentropic compression then in a z- pinch where the entire plasma column is heated. Keywords z-pinch, sheared flow, fast ignition I. INTRODUCTION Some of the earliest attempts to realize controlled nuclear fusion were based on the z- pinch, where a large current is discharged through a column of deuterium-tritium (DT) gas, to compress and heat the DT to the ignition temperature of T ≥ 10 keV. Subsequently, numerous z-pinch configurations have been studied to reach the conditions for thermonuclear ignition and burn. Here we consider two basic approaches to this problem. In the first, the entire length of the z-pinch column is heated to the required temperature for ignition. Conceivably, this can be done by resistive heating and compression of the stagnated z-pinch plasma [1, 2], or by isentropically compressing the z-pinch with a programmed fast rising current [3]. In a variation of this method a large current is discharged over a frozen DT fiber [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Formation and Stability of Spheromak/Field Reversed Configuration (FRC) Hybrids in SSX-FRC
    Formation and Stability of Spheromak/Field Reversed Configuration (FRC) Hybrids in SSX-FRC Andrew Fefferman Swarthmore College Department of Physics and Astronomy March 31, 2003 Abstract Axisymmetric plasma configurations which might be used for fusion reactors include tokamaks, spheromaks and field reversed configurations (FRC). The FRC has some advantages over tokamaks 2µ0P and spheromaks, including a high β 2 . However, compared to tokamaks and spheromaks, ≡ B relatively little is known about high β configurations like FRC's. This paper is based on a study of a high β spheromak/FRC hybrid configuration in SSX-FRC. The author constructed magnetic probes to measure all three components of the magnetic field vector at 96 locations throughout the hybrid. Measuring the structure of the magnetic field embedded in the plasma is a good way of characterizing the hybrid equilibrium and diagnosing its stability. The magnetics measurements are compared with theory and numerical simulations of axisymmetric toroidal equilibria. In brief, it was found that the hybrid configuration is stable for several characteristic times before tilting. The tilt instability was not observed in studies of counterhelicity spheromak merging by Ono et al [12, 13]. Furthermore, the anti-parallel toroidal fields of the counterhelicity spheromaks in SSX-FRC never completely annihilate, in contrast with the results of Ono et al [12, 13]. However, the persistence of the toroidal field structure is consistent with the simulation results by Omelchenko [32, 33]. The hybrid configuration is not consistent with the general axisymmetric plasma equilibrium (the Grad-Shafranov equilibrium) due to currents that flow across flux surfaces. Controlling the extent to which the spheromaks reconnect with midplane field coils external to the plasma does not have a significant effect on the stability of the plasma configuration.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 3.2 Various Fusion Concepts.Pdf
    Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, Fall 2018 Various Fusion Concepts Fall, 2018 Kyoung-Jae Chung Department of Nuclear Engineering Seoul National University Introduction Classification by confinement method Magnetic confinement fusion (MCF) Toroidal pinch Tokamak, spherical tokamak (ST) Stellarator Field reverse configuration Magnetic mirror Inertial confinement fusion (ICF) Laser fusion (direct drive, indirect drive) Inertial electrostatic confinement (IEC), Polywell Fast z-pinch, MagLIF (magnetized linear inertial fusion) Alternative concepts Cold fusion Bubble fusion Muon-catalyzed fusion 2/26 Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, Fall 2018 How can a magnetic field hold a plasma? Magnetic field of earth ~ 0.5 gauss ~ 0.00005 T 3/26 Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, Fall 2018 Particle motions in magnetic field a. Schematic of an ion and an electron gyrating in a straight magnetic field. b. An ion collision resulting in the ion’s being displaced to a new orbit. = × 4/26 Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, Fall 2018 Magnetic confinement: open vs. closed Magnetic fields may be either ‘open’ or ‘closed’. The simplest shape that will work is a torus. The torus is entirely filled with magnetic field, so that plasma placed inside will not, in principle, escape. Toroidal field line Poloidal field line 5/26 Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, Fall 2018 Why the field lines have to be twisted When we bend a cylinder into a torus so that the field lines do not strike a wall, the first of several toroidal effects comes into play. The magnetic field is always larger on the inside of a torus than on the outside. This is a toroidal effect that does not happen in a cylinder.
    [Show full text]
  • X-Pinches As Broadband Sources of X-Rays for Radiography
    J. Biomedical Science and Engineering, 2015, 8, 747-755 Published Online November 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jbise http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2015.811071 X-Pinches as Broadband Sources of X-Rays for Radiography Tatiana Shelkovenko, Sergey Pikuz, David Hammer Laboratory of Plasma Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA Received 25 September 2015; accepted 6 November 2015; published 9 November 2015 Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Two methods of using the X-pinch as a source of X-ray radiation for radiography of biological ob- jects are presented. X-pinches are found to be a very flexible method for generation of radiation over a wide spectral range and provide a high spatial and temporal resolution. Keywords X-Pinch, X-Ray, Hot Spot, Electron Beam, Point-Projection Radiography, Biological Object 1. Introduction The X-pinch, first proposed in 1982 at the Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, as a source of hot dense plasma [1], was being actively studied as an interesting object of high energy density physics. An X pinch plasma is generated using two (or more) fine wires being arranged so that they cross and touch at a single point, forming an “X” shape, as the load of a high current pulsed power generator [1]-[7]. Such generators pro- duce current pulses ranging from 50 kA to 1 MA peak current, or even more, with pulse durations typically in the range 100 to 300 ns.
    [Show full text]