Emergency Needs Tracking, Idleb Governorate 02 March 2020 OVERVIEW Methodology Since 15 January 2020, Northwest (NWS) has witnessed This ENT assessment focuses on communities known to have had an increase in aerial bombardments and shelling, particularly in over 300 individual IDP arrivals since 15 January, according to partner Southern Idleb and Western .1 Due to this escalation in data.2 102 communities were covered across 15 sub-districts in Idleb conflict there has been mass displacement of civilians, in particular governorate.3 Data collection was conducted remotely on 02 March to areas near to the Turkish-Syrian border. In response to this, through REACH’s network of key informants (KIs) in NWS with one REACH activated an Emergency Needs Tracking (ENT) system in KI interviewed per community.4 communities in NWS known to have seen a high number of Internally Most commonly reported priority needs of newly-arrived IDPs Displaced Person (IDP) arrivals since hostilities began to intensify across assessed communities by count of communities:+ on 15 January. This information aims to inform the immediate 1st 2nd 3rd humanitarian response by identifying both the priority needs, and Shelter 64 11 8 people in need, in communities hosting recently displaced persons. Food 17 16 12 % of communities reporting to have the presence of any Winterisation 8 25 23 vulnerable group, by vulnerability type:* NFIs 6 21 19 % Health 1 0 3 Livelihoods 4 13 30 Female-headed households 90% WASH 2 11 5 Elderly-headed households 82% Protection 0 4 2 Orphans 77% Education 0 1 0 Elderly travelling alone 55% Most commonly reported food sources for newly-arrived Women travelling alone 47% IDPs in assessed communities:* Child-headed HHs /children travelling alone 41% 1 Stores/markets in the community 88% Disabled-headed households 33% 2 Stores/markets in other communities 43% Persons with disabilities travelling alone 11% 3 Assistance from local councils/NGOs 40% Assessed communities where newly arrived IDPs are eating one meal or less per day, as reported by KIs:

TURKEY

Qah

SYRIA

IRAQ Dana Aleppo JORDAN Harim ALEPPO Qourqeena

Salqin M5 Kelly Estimated number of newly-arrived IDP HHs eating one meal or less TURKEY Tellemar per day: 1395 Maaret 900 300 Tamsrin Ma'arrat 20 Tamasrin Darkosh Kafruhin Percentage of newly-arrived IDP HHs Bennsh eating one meal or less per day: M5 Janudiyeh Idleb 1% - 30% 31% - 50% 51% - 70% 71% - 90% >90%

Jisr-Ash-Shugur Badama IDLEB No barriers to accessing food Mhambal M4 No newly-arrived IDPs reported M4 Assessed sub-district Area of conflict: Sourced from Live UA Map (02 march 2020) Front line 2km buffer ² M5 5km buffer km 0 4 8 12 Emergency Needs Tracking, Idleb Governorate 02 March 2020

Most commonly reported shelter needs of newly-arrived IDPs in Most commonly reported needs of newly-arrived IDPs in 56 83 assessed communities reporting shelter as a priority need:* assessed communities reporting winterisation as a priority need:* 1 New or additional tents 95% 1 Heating fuel 98% 2 Tarpaulins or plastic sheeting 69% 2 Winter clothes 54% 3 Cash for those who are renting 33% 3 Floor mats 45% Communities with highest number of newly-arrived IDP Most commonly reported needs of newly-arrived IDPs in 46 households living without any form of shelter: assessed communities reporting NFIs as a priority need:* # HHs % HHs 1 Cooking fuel 70% 1 Kafr Takharim 310 10 2 Mattresses and sleeping mats 35% 2 Tellemar 113 15 2 Solar panels 35% 3 Eskat 48 5 35% 2 Batteries Communities with highest number of newly-arrived IDP Communities with highest number of newly-arrived IDP households living in unfinished or damaged buildings: households living in makeshift shelters:

# HHs % HHs # HHs % HHs 1 Kabta 740 40 1 Kafr Takharim 310 10 2 Ma’arrat Tamasrin 700 35 2 Haranbush 110 5 3 Idleb 651 35 3 Boz Ghaz 55 10

Assessed communities where newly-arrived IDPs are residing in makeshift shelter, unfinished/damaged buildings and without any form of shelter:

Selwa

Aqrabat

Dana AEPPO Aleppo Harim Qourqeena Eskat Kafr Qourqeena Takharim M5 ar Takharim elly Estimated number o newly-arried IDP RKE Armanaz Haranbush HHs residing in dierent types o shelter

Tellemar 195 Maaret Maarrat 900 Armanaz 00 Haasraja Tamsrin Tamasrin 20

Sheikh ouse Percentage o newly-arried IDP HHs Darkosh Bennsh residing in dierent types o shelter Idleb Janudiyeh M5 1% - 0% Idleb 1% - 50% Janudiyeh 51% - 70% 71% - 90% 90% No newly-arried IDPs reported to Jisr-Ash-Shugur be residing in these types o shelter Badama Ariha Mhambal No newly-arried IDPs reported M4 IDE M4 Assessed sub-district Area o conlict Sourced rom ie A Map (02 march 2020) Front line 2km buer * ypes of shelter refers to newly-arrived IDP HHs residing in makeshift ² shelter, unfinisheddamaged buildingsM5 and without any form of shelter 5km buer km 0 4 8 12 Emergency Needs Tracking, Idleb Governorate 02 March 2020

Most commonly reported drinking water sources for newly- Most common reported reasons for newly-arrived IDPs arrived IDPs in assessed communities:* intending to depart in all assessed communities:* Informal water trucking 53% 1 % HHs 2 Formal water trucking conducted by authorities/NGOs 35% Anticipation of future conflict escalation 52% Reduced access to shelter 49% 3 Piped water network 6% Loss of income 27% Most commonly reported health needs for newly-arrived IDPs in Access to money to pay for movement 24% 5 assessed communities reporting health as a priority need:* Reduced access to food 13% 1 First aid/emergency care (accidents and injuries) 75% 2 Pediatric consultations 75% 3 Treatment for chronic disease 75% Most commonly reported reasons for newly-arrived IDPs intending to remain in all assessed communities:* Most commonly reported sub-districts of intended destination for newly-arrived IDPs intending to depart in all % HHs assessed communities:* Lack of money to pay for movement 51% % HHs Family ties in host community 50% Afrin 31% Access to shelter 38% Harim 28% Access to humanitarian assistance 24% A’zaz 20% Safety and security situation in the community 23% Jisr-Ash-Shughur 7% Al Bab 5% Assessed communities with newly-arrived IDPs where KIs report a lack of access to clean and sufficient drinking water:

Selwa

Qah

Dana Aleppo Harim AEPPO Qourqeena

M5 Salqin ar Takharim Estimated number o newly-arried atin IDP HHs unable to access suicient Kafr Takharim RKE Haranbush clean water Maaret 195 Tellemar 900 Tamsrin 00 uwaro - m Elriyah Armanaz 20 Percentage o newly-arried IDP HHs ar Jales Darkosh unable to access suicient clean Bennsh Sadiyeh - water Bsentiya Idleb M5 1% - 0% Janudiyeh Idleb 1% - 50% 51% - 70% 71% - 90% 90% No barriers to accessing Jisr-Ash-Shugur suicient clean water Badama Ariha IDE Mhambal M4 No newly-arried IDPs reported M4 Assessed sub-district Area o conlict Sourced rom ie A Map (02 march 2020) Front line 2km buer ² M5 5km buer km 0 4 8 12 Emergency Needs Tracking, Idleb Governorate 02 March 2020

Most commonly reported barriers to humanitarian access in Communities with highest number of newly-arrived IDP 27 communities reporting barriers:* households arriving to the community without heating fuel:

1 Obstacles related to terrain and poor infrastructure 78% # HHs % HHs Kafr Takharim 2728 88 15% 2 Ongoing insecurity/ hostilities affecting the area Kelly 2500 100 Tal Elkaramej 2377 98 3 Restrictions to humanitarian actors imposed by 15% armed groups in the area Ma’arrat Tamasrin 2000 100 Haranbush 1980 90

Communities with highest number of newly-arrived IDP 27% households arriving to the community without cooking KIs in 27 communities (27%) reported barriers utensils: to humanitarian access. # HHs % HHs Kafr Takharim 2232 72 Communities with highest number of newly-arrived IDP households unable to access healthcare: Selwa 1150 50 Qourqeena 1000 50 # HHs % HHs Tal Elkaramej 970 40 Haranbush 660 30 Armanaz 925 50 Selwa 575 25 Communities with highest number of newly-arrived IDP Idleb 465 25 households arriving to the community without mattresses/ Kafr Takharim 465 15 bedding: Kafr Jales 462 70 # HHs % HHs Shekh Bahr 413 75 Kafr Takharim 1891 61 Kaftin 325 50 Selwa 1150 50 - Bqesemtoh 245 70 Kelly 1000 40 Salqin 240 20 Haranbush 880 40 220 40 Tal Elkaramej 849 35

Communities with highest number of newly-arrived IDP households arriving to the community without blankets: Communities with highest number of newly-arrived IDP households without access to functioning toilet: # HHs % HHs Kafr Takharim 1829 59 # HHs % HHs Haranbush 1100 50 Kafr Takharim 930 30 Selwa 920 40 Tal Elkaramej 728 30 Kelly 750 30 Selwa 690 30 Idleb 651 35 Haranbush 660 30 648 35 Endnotes 1 Dana 575 50 OCHA, Northwestern Syria Situation Report No. 7, 29 Jan 2020 2 Data from REACH’s internal population monitoring under the IDP Situation Monitoring Qah 518 45 Initiative (ISMI) alongside data from HNAP. 3 Communities also refers to camps and sites where there are sites within or near the - Darhashan 378 25 community. Salqin 360 30 4 KIs are chosen based on their knowledge of IDP populations and need. * KIs could choose from multiple answer options. Kuwaro-Um Elriyah 353 30 + Throughout this document, ‘newly-arrived’ IDPs refers to IDPs who arrived in the assessed community after 15 January.