Malawi 2020 HIV Index and Exhibits
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Survey of Public Attitudes to Homosexuality and Gender Non-Conformity in Malawi Under Wraps
under wraps a survey of public attitudes to homosexuality and gender non-conformity in Malawi under wraps This report is called Under Wraps because it shows that Malawi has a A survey of public attitudes comparatively high LGBTI population that is known by a significant number to homosexuality and gender of ordinary Malawians to be socially vulnerable – but this reality remains non-conformity in Malawi hidden in Malawi’s social consciousness. Despite strong social values and aspirations of equality, non-violence, and belonging in a community, the majority of Malawians restrict LGBTI © The Other Foundation 2019 people from being openly recognized and safely included in families, communities, Postnet Suite 209, Private Bag X31, workplaces, cultural practices, and Saxonworld, 2132, public policies. However, a large number Johannesburg, South Africa of Malawians are thinking differently about discrimination, even the majority in www.theotherfoundation.org Africascope is a market research firm which provides decision-makers relation to recognition of intersex people with strategic information for market and socio-economic development and violence towards LGBTI people. of people in Africa. Follow us on Twitter @OtherFoundation contents 1 Summary.......................................................................................................... 12 2 Introduction..................................................................................................... 16 3 Background to study...................................................................................... -
The Global State of Lgbtiq Organizing
THE GLOBAL STATE OF LGBTIQ ORGANIZING THE RIGHT TO REGISTER Written by Felicity Daly DrPH Every day around the world, LGBTIQ people’s human rights and dignity are abused in ways that shock the conscience. The stories of their struggles and their resilience are astounding, yet remain unknown—or willfully ignored—by those with the power to make change. OutRight Action International, founded in 1990 as the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, works alongside LGBTIQ people in the Global South, with offices in six countries, to help identify community-focused solutions to promote policy for lasting change. We vigilantly monitor and document human rights abuses to spur action when they occur. We train partners to expose abuses and advocate for themselves. Headquartered in New York City, OutRight is the only global LGBTIQ-specific organization with a permanent presence at the United Nations in New York that advocates for human rights progress for LGBTIQ people. [email protected] https://www.facebook.com/outrightintl http://twitter.com/outrightintl http://www.youtube.com/lgbthumanrights http://OutRightInternational.org/iran OutRight Action International 80 Maiden Lane, Suite 1505, New York, NY 10038 U.S.A. P: +1 (212) 430.6054 • F: +1 (212) 430.6060 This work may be reproduced and redistributed, in whole or in part, without alteration and without prior written permission, solely for nonprofit administrative or educational purposes provided all copies contain the following statement: © 2018 OutRight Action International. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of OutRight Action International. No other use is permitted without the express prior written permission of OutRight Action International. -
Addressing Human Rights Violations Based on Sexual Orientation & Gender Identi
www.arc-international.net Addressing human rights violations based on sexual orientation & gender identity at the 27th session of the Human Rights Council - September 2014 There are a number of opportunities to raise awareness of human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity at the upcoming 27th session of the Human Rights Council. These include general debate following the update by the High Commissioner, interactive dialogue with relevant Special Procedures (e.g. on water and sanitation, and arbitrary detention), relevant panels, UPR report adoptions and general debate under items 3, 4 or 8, as well as the opportunity for a resolution addressing ongoing violence and discrimination against LGBTI persons. This document provides a summary of these opportunities. In addition: − Annex I excerpts the references to sexual orientation and gender identity in the reports of the Special Procedures and other reports to the Council; − Annex II highlights UPR recommendations relating to sexual orientation and gender identity in the reports of the States under review; − Annex III outlines civil society expectations from the Human Rights Council in protecting the human rights of LGBTI persons through a resolution. OVERVIEW OF THE SESSION Opportunities to raise awareness of human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity at the 27th session of the Human Rights Council include: General Debate following the High Commissioner’s update This will be Mr. Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein’s first presentation to the Human Rights Council in his new capacity as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Under Navi Pillay, the OHCHR played an active role in calling for an end to violence, discrimination and criminalisation based on sexual orientation and gender identity. -
1 Malawi – Researched and Compiled by the Refugee Documentation
Malawi – Researched and compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on 29 November 2016 Whether state protection is available and actually provided for LGBT people in Malawi, particularly for instances where people have been forced to hide their sexuality. An opinion piece published by the Inter Press Service states: “In May 2012, in her state of the nation address, President Joyce Banda asserted that the provisions of the penal code that criminalise homosexual acts should be repealed. In November 2012, during a public debate, the justice minister announced the suspension of sodomy laws. Since then, some political parties have indicated they would oppose any move to decriminalise homosexuality, and a number of religious and traditional leaders have expressed similar sentiments. Interestingly, the Malawi Human Rights Commission has not made its position clear on homosexuality as a human rights matter.” (Inter Press Service (17 November 2013) OP-ED: Malawi’s Constitution Clear on Gay Rights but Politicians Aren’t) This document also states: “Section 20 of the constitution affirms the equality of all persons before the law. It also prohibits ‘[d]iscrimination of persons in any form is prohibited and all persons are, under any law, guaranteed equal and effective protection against discrimination on grounds of race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, nationality, ethnic or social origin, disability, property, birth or other status’. Therefore, any legal provisions that violate human rights, as is the case with those that criminalise homosexuality, must be repealed by the relevant authorities, irrespective of whether the majority of Malawians support such a move or not. -
LGBT Rights in Malawi: One Step Back, Two Steps Forward? the Case of R V Steven Monjeza Soko and Tiwonge Chimbalanga Kachepa
Journal of African Law, 60, 3 (2016), 365–387 © SOAS, University of London, 2016. doi:10.1017/S0021855316000127 LGBT Rights in Malawi: One Step Back, Two Steps Forward? The Case of R v Steven Monjeza Soko and Tiwonge Chimbalanga Kachepa Bradley Demone* Ministry of the Attorney General, Ontario, Canada [email protected] Abstract In late 2009 two Malawians, a man and a transgender woman, united in an engagement ceremony. Police charged both under Malawi’s anti-sodomy provi- sions. The case captured the nation’s attention and drew scrutiny from foreign gov- ernments and human rights organizations. Several western nations threatened to withdraw aid unless the prosecution was discontinued. Nevertheless, the defen- dants were convicted and sentenced. Following a visit from the UN secretary gen- eral, Malawi’s president pardoned the couple, but emphasized that the “two gay boys” had offended Malawi and its people. This article examines this case (Rv Soko and Kachepa) and its impact on Malawi’s LGBT rights movement. Using Thomas Stoddard’s “rule-shifting, culture-shifting” paradigm, it considers the efficacy of international and domestic advocacy efforts and concludes that aid con- ditionality is, in many ways, counter productive. Conversely, multi-dimensional do- mestic advocacy is a promising strategy to change the relevant law and public attitudes associated with the Malawian LGBT community. Keywords Malawi, human rights, advocacy, LGBT rights, “rule-shifting, culture-shifting” INTRODUCTION “Kali kokha nkanyama, tili awiri ntiwanthu.” This phrase, in Malawi’s native language, Chichewa, translates as: “[w]hen you are on your own you are as good as an animal of the wild; when there are two * Assistant crown attorney, Ministry of the Attorney General, Ontario, Canada. -
Cmi Report May 2019
NUMBER 04 CMI REPORT MAY 2019 Photo: Harsha K R on Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0) Gendercide AUTHORS Magnus Hatlebakk and marginalisation Ottar Mæstad Kari Telle Liv Tønnessen An initial review of Vibeke Wang the knowledge base Gendercide and marginalisation: An initial review of the knowledge base CMI report, number 4, May 2019 Authors Magnus Hatlebakk Ottar Mæstad Kari Telle Liv Tønnessen Vibeke Wang ISSN 0805-505X (print) ISSN 1890-503X (PDF) ISBN 978-82-8062-733-9 (print) ISBN 978-82-8062-732-2 (PDF) Cover photo Harsha K R Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Preventing gendercide ................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 The extent of gendercide .................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Causes ................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.3 Policy responses ................................................................................................................................ 10 3. Marginalisation and “leave no one behind” .................................................................................. 15 3.1 What is a marginalised group? .......................................................................................................... 15 -
A Survey of Laws Impacting the Human Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Persons in Selected Southern African Countries
A SURVEY OF LAWS IMPACTING THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER PERSONS IN SELECTED SOUTHERN AFRICAN COUNTRIES March 16, 2016 OutRight Action International wishes to acknowledge with thanks the invaluable contributions to the report provided on a pro bono basis by the international law firms of Milbank and Webber Wentzel, with the support of the Cyrus R. Vance Center for International Justice, and the African Affairs Committee, of the New York Bar Association. I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report seeks to outline the current state of legal protection for the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (“LGBT”) persons in southern Africa by examining relevant current legislation in each of South Africa, Malawi, Namibia, Zambia and Zimbabwe and surveying the enforcement activities with regard to said legislation and communal attitudes toward LGBT individuals. By combining the individual case studies and providing a like-for- like comparison, this report seeks to identify how the neighboring states have influenced each other, both legislatively and with regard to popular attitudes, and to ascertain specific areas in which any individual country has made particularly progressive strides, thereby isolating the factors which have precipitated such progress. This report consists of the following sections: (i) an executive summary, (ii) case studies for each of South Africa, Malawi, Namibia, Zambia and Zimbabwe, (iii) a brief analysis of the international and regional treaties and protocols that may impact the human rights of LGBT persons to which any of the above countries is a party and (iv) a conclusion summarizing the results of the preceding analysis. -
Report Commission of Inquiry Into Circumstances of The
REPORT OF THE COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH OF THE LATE PRESIDENT NGWAZI PROF. BINGU WA MUTHARIKA AND INTO THE POLITICAL TRANSITION FOLLOWING HIS DEATH TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT . v LIST OF COMMISSIONERS AND SECRETARIAT . vii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS . vii LIST OF APPENDICES . viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . x CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 SCOPE OF THE REPORT . 1 1.2 BACKGROUND . 1 1.3 ISSUES ARISING FROM THE DEATH OF THE PRESIDENT . 5 1.4 APPOINTMENT OF THE COMMISSION OF INQUIRY . 7 1.5 TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE COMMISSION . 8 1.6 METHODOLOGY AND WORKPLAN . 8 CHAPTER 2 EVIDENCE TAKEN REGARDING THE DEATH OF THE PRESIDENT 2.1 MEDICAL ATTENTION AVAILABLE TO THE LATE PRESIDENT IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING HIS DEATH . .9 2.2 EVENTS AT STATE HOUSE ON THE 5th OF APRIL 2012. 10 2.2.1 The President’s Appointments for the Day . 11 2.2.2 Appointment With Hon. Mrs. Agnes Penemulungu, MP. 12 2.2.3 The President’s Collapse . 13 2.2.4 Immediate Response to the Collapse of the President . 14 2.2.5 Referral to Kamuzu Central Hospital . 15 2.2.6 Arrival and Reception at Kamuzu Central Hospital . 16 2.2.7 Admission and Treatment in the ICU . 17 2.2.8 Arrival of Air Ambulance Doctors and Preparations for Departure . 22 2.2.9 Departure for the Airport . 23 2.2.10 Events at the Kamuzu International Airport . 23 2.2.11 Hospital Records Regarding the Late President at the Kamuzu Central Hospital . 25 2.2.12 State House Press Release On the President’s Illness . -
1 December 2016 Refugee Documentation Centre Country
December 2016 Refugee Documentation Centre Country Information Pack MALAWI Disclaimer Country Information Packs (CIPs) are prepared by researching publicly accessible information currently available to the Refugee Documentation Centre within time constraints. CIPs contain a selection of representative links to sources under a number of categories for use as Country of Origin Information. Links are correct at the time of publication. Please note that CIPs are not, and do not purport to be, exhaustive with regard to conditions in the countries surveyed or conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or protection. The General Human Rights Reports category contains links to information which may be useful for a number of the other categories. Contents 1. Nationality/Citizenship/Residency ............................................................. 3 2. Maps ......................................................................................................... 3 3. Local Information/Languages/Culture/Customs ......................................... 3 4. General Human Rights Reports ................................................................ 4 5. Conflict/Security ........................................................................................ 4 6. Minorities/Ethnic Groups ........................................................................... 5 Homosexuals................................................................................................ 5 Ethnic Groups.............................................................................................. -
Press Review
PREVIEW The National Assembly budget meeting is what dominated the press coverage in June. Finance Minister Goodall Gondwe was tasked again to present the 2016/ 2017 National budget to the August House expecting the parliamentarians to critic it and eventually pass it. And after lengthy discussions debates the budget was passed But not without some opposition on several points. Every other year the process of pre-budget consultations take place where the minister and technocrats in the ministry meet the civil society, society of accountants the academia and many stakeholders to get some input in the national budget in all the three regions. However there is now a new proposal by Members of Parliament who would want to be included and accommodated in the consultations. These feel they also own the national budget and should be part of it. Members of parliament would want to give alternatives and ideas that could be included in the budget because they are the ones who are always closer to the reality because they are with the grassroots all the time. In the past there were concerns that the even after consultations where good suggestions and proposals come out, there is almost nothing that is included in the budget. This raised so many questions why there should be consultations when whatever is proposed at such meeting is not accommodated in the national budget year in year out. The budget sitting of parliament attracts a lot of debates sides of the National assembly and the masses. It is therefore not surprising that in the process of scrutinizing the budget allocation parliamentarians cross paths. -
A Critical Analysis in Relation to Human Rights in Malawi
CAVENDISH UNIVERSITY ZAMBIA School of Law HOMOSEXUALITY: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS IN RELATION TO HUMAN RIGHTS IN MALAWI By NATASHA KAFOTEKA (004-700) A Dissertation submitted to the School of Law, in partial fulfilment of the award of Bachelor in of Law Degree (LLB) at Cavendish University Zambia CUZ 2020 i Homosexuality: A Critical Analysis in Relation to Human Rights in Malawi 004-700 ABSTRACT HOMOSEXUALITY: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS IN HUMAN RIGHTS IN MALAWI: Despite the existence of laws criminalising sexual activity between same-sex couplings in the Malawi Penal Code, and rising awareness of human rights related to sexuality on the international plane, the topic of homosexuality in relation to human rights was yet to be addressed in the domestic context until R v Soko and another. While the country is yet to make progressive changes on its laws regarding homosexuality, public opinion has been identified as playing a major role in the decriminalisation process. This project sought to ascertain the reasons the average Malawian can give for opposing homosexuality, in order to determine if such opinions may be rationalised by existing legal principles. In doing so, possible recommendations could then be made on what measures can be taken to change public opinions on the matter of homosexuality and thus pave the way for decriminalisation. Through a mixed- model research design, secondary data analysis and a literature review, the study found that a majority of Malawians did not agree with homosexuality, and supported the imposition of legal restrictions for homosexual activity in the country. However, more educated participants were shown to be more tolerant of same-sex activity. -
Secretariat Distr.: Limited
UNITED NATIONS ST /SG/SER.C/L.615 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Secretariat Distr.: Limited 6 October 2006 PROTOCOL AND LIAISON LIST OF DELEGATIONS TO THE SIXTY-FIRST SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY I. MEMBER STATES Page Page Afghanistan.........................................................................5 Cyprus.............................................................................. 32 Albania ...............................................................................5 Czech Republic ................................................................ 33 Algeria ...............................................................................6 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea .......................... 34 Andorra...............................................................................7 Denmark........................................................................... 35 Angola ................................................................................7 Djibouti ............................................................................ 36 Antigua and Barbuda ..........................................................8 Dominica.......................................................................... 36 Argentina............................................................................8 Dominican Republic......................................................... 37 Armenia..............................................................................9