DOCSLIB.ORG

The Dioskouroi on Four-Figure Etruscan Mirrors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Dioskouroi on Four-Figure Etruscan Mirrors THE DIOSKOUROI ON FOUR-FIGURE ETRUSCAN MIRRORS By DANIEL “WOOD D” WEBER A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2006 Copyright 2006 by DANIEL “WOOD D” WEBER Oh Muses, sing of my very own ‘divine’ twins, clear-voiced Ariel Faith and lovely-haired Gabryelle Raina, to whom I lovingly dedicate this study. TABLE OF CONTENTS page LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................. vi LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... vii ABSTRACT....................................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................1 Etruscan Bronzeworking ..............................................................................................1 The Dioskouroi/ Tinas Cliniar......................................................................................2 2 CHARACTERISTICS OF ETRUSCAN BRONZE MIRRORS..................................4 Material and Limitations...............................................................................................4 Types of Mirrors and Terminology ..............................................................................6 Inscriptions ...................................................................................................................9 Themes and Usage......................................................................................................10 The Frequency of the Dioskouroi/Tinas Cliniar on Etruscan Mirrors........................13 3 CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOUR-FIGURE DIOSKOUROI/ TINAS CLINIAR CONVERSATION MIRRORS ..................................................................................25 Etruscan Iconography of the Tinas Cliniar.................................................................26 Catalogue Classification Methodology.......................................................................30 Type I Mirrors: Four-figure with Leaning Dioskouroi...............................................31 Type IA Four-figure Dioskouroi Mirrors............................................................32 Type IB Four-figure Dioskouroi Mirrors ............................................................34 Type II Mirrors: Four-figure with Seated Dioskouroi................................................35 Type IIA Four-figure Dioskouroi Mirrors...........................................................35 Type IIB Four-figure Dioskouroi Mirrors...........................................................37 Type III Mirrors: Four-figure with Standing Dioskouroi...........................................38 Type IIIA Four-figure Dioskouroi Mirrors .........................................................38 Type IIIB Four-figure Dioskouroi Mirrors..........................................................39 Type IV Mirrors: Four-figure with Mixed Dioskouroi...............................................39 Type IVA Four-figure Dioskouroi Mirrors .........................................................40 Type IVB Four-figure Dioskouroi Mirrors .........................................................41 iv 4 EVIDENCE FOR THE CULT OF THE DIOSKOUROI/ TINAS CLINIAR ...........76 The Myth of the Dioskouroi .......................................................................................76 The Cult in Greece......................................................................................................77 Transmission of the Cult to Sicily and South Italy.....................................................79 The Dioskouroi in Etruria...........................................................................................83 5 ANALYSIS.................................................................................................................96 Attribution: The Engraver of Flexible Columns.........................................................96 The Judgment of Paris as a Model..............................................................................97 Identification of the Accompanying Figures ............................................................100 Pattern Books............................................................................................................104 Relationship of Mirror Usage to the Dioskouroi ......................................................107 6 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................132 APPENDIX A FOUR-FIGURE DIOSKOUROI CONVERSATION MIRROR CATALOGUE....136 B CONCORDANCE WITH ETRUSKISCHE SPIEGEL AND LIMC ........................176 C COMPARATIVE NAME CHART ..........................................................................177 LIST OF REFERENCES.................................................................................................178 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ...........................................................................................187 v LIST OF TABLES Table page 2-1. Number of Dioskouroi Etruscan mirrors in the CSE volumes grouped by the number of figures in the medallion composition.. ...................................................16 2-2. Number of Dioskouroi Etruscan mirrors found in sources other than the CSE series.........................................................................................................................18 3-1. Attributes present on Type I Dioskouroi mirrors. ....................................................43 3-2. Type I Dioskouroi mirror handle types. ...................................................................43 3-3. Type I Dioskouroi mirror border garland types........................................................43 3-4. Attributes present on Type II Dioskouroi mirrors....................................................43 3-5. Type II Dioskouroi mirror handle types...................................................................44 3-6. Type II Dioskouroi mirror border garland types. .....................................................44 3-7. Attributes present on Type III Dioskouroi mirrors...................................................44 3-8. Type III Dioskouroi mirror handle types..................................................................44 3-9. Type III Dioskouroi mirror border garland types.....................................................45 3-10. Attributes present on Type IV Dioskouroi mirrors. .................................................45 3-11. Type IV Dioskouroi mirror handle types. ................................................................45 3-12. Type IV Dioskouroi mirror border garland types.....................................................45 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 2-1. Handle mirror and tang mirror terms. R. Nicholls, CSE Great Britain 2: Cambridge, p. 7).......................................................................................................20 2-2. Types of animal head terminals found on Etruscan handle mirrors.........................21 2-3. Decorative border garland types prominent on four-figure Dioskouroi mirrors: A) cable garland B) spiky garland C) laurel garland. ..............................................21 2-4. Mirror with śuthina inscription.................................................................................22 2-5. Adornment of Turan in preparation for Judgment of Paris (R.D. De Puma, CSE USA 1: Midwestern Collections, pl. 4b)...................................................................23 2-6. Mirror with engraved Lasa figure (L. Bonfante, CSE USA 3: New York, pl. 8a).....24 3-1. Hats worn by the Dioskouroi on four-figure conversation mirrors: A) Phrygian caps B) piloi C) helmets...........................................................................................46 3-2. Catalogue Type IVB, 1 (E. Gerhard, Etruskische Spiegel III, pl. 255B). ................47 3-3. Bronze mirror from Chiusi with Perseus (center) wearing calcei repandi without the pointed toe (L. Bonfante, Etruscan Dress, fig. 148). .........................................48 3-4. Catalogue Type IIIB, 2 (E. Gerhard, Etruskische Spiegel IV, pl. 355).....................49 3-5. Two-figure Dioskouroi mirror (R. D. De Puma, CSE USA 1: Midwestern Collections, pl. 8a). ..................................................................................................50 3-6. Catalogue Type IA, 28 (R. Nicholls, CSE Great Britain 2, pl. 10a)........................51 3-7. Castur or Pultuce leading his horse (D. Emmanuel-Rebuffat, CSE France 1: Paris – Musee Du Louvre, pl. 26a). .........................................................................52 3-8. Winged Menrva flanked by Dioskouroi (G. Colonna, LIMC 2, “Athena/Menerva” #182). ........................................................................................53 3-9. Catalogue Type IA, 1 (U. Liepmann, CSE Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2, pl. 12a). ...........................................................................................54 vii 3-10. Catalogue Type IA, 38 (G. Heres, CSE Deutsche Demokratische Republik 2, pl. 21b)...........................................................................................................................55 3-11. Catalogue Type IA, 39 (E. Gerhard, Etruskische
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Textiles of the Han Dynasty & Their Relationship with Society
    The Textiles of the Han Dynasty & Their Relationship with Society Heather Langford Theses submitted for the degree of Master of Arts Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Centre of Asian Studies University of Adelaide May 2009 ii Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the research requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Centre of Asian Studies School of Humanities and Social Sciences Adelaide University 2009 iii Table of Contents 1. Introduction.........................................................................................1 1.1. Literature Review..............................................................................13 1.2. Chapter summary ..............................................................................17 1.3. Conclusion ........................................................................................19 2. Background .......................................................................................20 2.1. Pre Han History.................................................................................20 2.2. Qin Dynasty ......................................................................................24 2.3. The Han Dynasty...............................................................................25 2.3.1. Trade with the West............................................................................. 30 2.4. Conclusion ........................................................................................32 3. Textiles and Technology....................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Herakles Iconography on Tyrrhenian Amphorae
    HERAKLES ICONOGRAPHY ON TYRRHENIAN AMPHORAE _____________________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri-Columbia _____________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts ______________________________________________ by MEGAN LYNNE THOMSEN Dr. Susan Langdon, Thesis Supervisor DECEMBER 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Susan Langdon, and the other members of my committee, Dr. Marcus Rautman and Dr. David Schenker, for their help during this process. Also, thanks must be given to my family and friends who were a constant support and listening ear this past year. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………ii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS……………………………………………………………..v Chapter 1. TYRRHENIAN AMPHORAE—A BRIEF STUDY…..……………………....1 Early Studies Characteristics of Decoration on Tyrrhenian Amphorae Attribution Studies: Identifying Painters and Workshops Market Considerations Recent Scholarship The Present Study 2. HERAKLES ON TYRRHENIAN AMPHORAE………………………….…30 Herakles in Vase-Painting Herakles and the Amazons Herakles, Nessos and Deianeira Other Myths of Herakles Etruscan Imitators and Contemporary Vase-Painting 3. HERAKLES AND THE FUNERARY CONTEXT………………………..…48 Herakles in Etruria Etruscan Concepts of Death and the Underworld Etruscan Funerary Banquets and Games 4. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………..67 iii APPENDIX: Herakles Myths on Tyrrhenian Amphorae……………………………...…72 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………………..77 ILLUSTRATIONS………………………………………………………………………82 iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Tyrrhenian Amphora by Guglielmi Painter. Bloomington, IUAM 73.6. Herakles fights Nessos (Side A), Four youths on horseback (Side B). Photos taken by Megan Thomsen 82 2. Tyrrhenian Amphora (Beazley #310039) by Fallow Deer Painter. Munich, Antikensammlungen 1428. Photo CVA, MUNICH, MUSEUM ANTIKER KLEINKUNST 7, PL. 322.3 83 3. Tyrrhenian Amphora (Beazley #310045) by Timiades Painter (name vase).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Phasis 8, 2005 Ekaterine Kobakhidze (Tbilisi) THE ISSUE OF DESCENT OF THE DEITY MARS An attempt to identify the functions of Roman deity Mars has been made in many research works.1 Particular interest towards this god is motivated by his participation in so-called Roman genealogical myths. The father of Romulus and Remus, the main character of one of the earliest patterns of the surviving folk poetry, has for a long time remained in science in the shade of the Greek god of war Ares, and was perceived as his Roman interpretation. Now "justice is restored", and under the influence of Greek mythology, he re-acquired the role of the god of war for the second time, though his primary function has not been definitely identified. I believe that obtaining further insight into the essence of the problem is impossible without taking into consideration the "Italian context" of the Ro- man deity. In this case I mean the pantheon of the peoples living on the Apennines peninsula and participation of Mars‟ namesake gods in the forma- tion of functions of the Roman deity. These mythological characters and gods are: of Marsians – Marsia, Mar- sos, of Auzons – Mares, and Etruscan – Maris. Let us consider the existing information on each of the deities, which in first two cases is fully based on literary sources. 1 Georg Wissowa, Religion u. Kultur d. Römer, 2. Auflage, München, 1912, U. W. Scholz, Studien z. altitalischen u. altrömischen Marskult u. Marsmythos, Heidelberg, 1970, E. Simon, Il dio Marte nell‟arte dell‟ Italia Centrale, Studi Etruschi, XLVI, 1978, 135-74, G.
    [Show full text]
  • "Ancient Mirror": an Interpretation of Gujing Ji in the Context of Medieval Chinese Cultural History Ju E Chen
    East Asian History NUMBER 27 . JUNE 2004 Institute of Advanced Studies Australian National University Editor Geremie R. Barme Associate Editor Helen Lo Business Manager Marion Weeks Editorial Advisors B0rge Bakken John Clark Lo uise Edwards Mark Elvin (Convenor) John Fitzgerald Colin Jeffcott Li Tana Kam Lo uie Le wis Mayo Gavan McCormack David Marr Tessa Morris-Suzuki Benjamin Penny Kenneth Wells Design and Production Design ONE Solutions, Victoria Street, Hall ACT 2618 Printed by Goanna Print, Fyshwick, ACT This is the twenty-seventh issue of Ea st Asian History, printed August 2005, in the series previously entitled Papers on Far Ea sternHist ory. This externally refereed journal is published twice a year. Contributions to The Editor, Ea st Asian Hist ory Division of Pacific and Asian History Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Phone +61 2 6125 314 0 Fax +61 26125 5525 Email [email protected] Subscription Enquiries to Marion Weeks, East Asian History, at the above address, or to [email protected]. au Annual Subscription Australia A$50 (including GST) Overseas US$45 (GST free) (for two issues) ISSN 1036-6008 iii CONTENTS 1 Friendship in Ancient China Aat Vervoom 33 The Mystery of an "Ancient Mirror": An Interpretation of Gujing ji in the Context of Medieval Chinese Cultural History Ju e Chen 51 The Missing First Page of the Preclassical Mongolian Version of the Hs iao-ching: A Tentative Reconstruction Igor de Rachewiltz 57 Historian and Courtesan: Chen Yinke !l*Ji[Nj. and the Writing of Liu Rushi Biezhuan t9P�Qjll:J,jiJf� We n-hsin Yeh 71 Demons, Gangsters, and Secret Societies in Early Modern China Robert].
    [Show full text]
  • Piece Mold, Lost Wax & Composite Casting Techniques of The
    Piece Mold, Lost Wax & Composite Casting Techniques of the Chinese Bronze Age Behzad Bavarian and Lisa Reiner Dept. of MSEM College of Engineering and Computer Science September 2006 Table of Contents Abstract Approximate timeline 1 Introduction 2 Bronze Transition from Clay 4 Elemental Analysis of Bronze Alloys 4 Melting Temperature 7 Casting Methods 8 Casting Molds 14 Casting Flaws 21 Lost Wax Method 25 Sanxingdui 28 Environmental Effects on Surface Appearance 32 Conclusion 35 References 36 China can claim a history rich in over 5,000 years of artistic, philosophical and political advancement. As well, it is birthplace to one of the world's oldest and most complex civilizations. By 1100 BC, a high level of artistic and technical skill in bronze casting had been achieved by the Chinese. Bronze artifacts initially were copies of clay objects, but soon evolved into shapes invoking bronze material characteristics. Essentially, the bronze alloys represented in the copper-tin-lead ternary diagram are not easily hot or cold worked and are difficult to shape by hammering, the most common techniques used by the ancient Europeans and Middle Easterners. This did not deter the Chinese, however, for they had demonstrated technical proficiency with hard, thin walled ceramics by the end of the Neolithic period and were able to use these skills to develop a most unusual casting method called the piece mold process. Advances in ceramic technology played an influential role in the progress of Chinese bronze casting where the piece mold process was more of a technological extension than a distinct innovation. Certainly, the long and specialized experience in handling clay was required to form the delicate inscriptions, to properly fit the molds together and to prevent them from cracking during the pour.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parthenon Frieze: Viewed As the Panathenaic Festival Preceding the Battle of Marathon
    The Parthenon Frieze: Viewed as the Panathenaic Festival Preceding the Battle of Marathon By Brian A. Sprague Senior Seminar: HST 499 Professor Bau-Hwa Hsieh Western Oregon University Thursday, June 07, 2007 Readers Professor Benedict Lowe Professor Narasingha Sil Copyright © Brian A. Sprague 2007 The Parthenon frieze has been the subject of many debates and the interpretation of it leads to a number of problems: what was the subject of the frieze? What would the frieze have meant to the Athenian audience? The Parthenon scenes have been identified in many different ways: a representation of the Panathenaic festival, a mythical or historical event, or an assertion of Athenian ideology. This paper will examine the Parthenon Frieze in relation to the metopes, pediments, and statues in order to prove the validity of the suggestion that it depicts the Panathenaic festival just preceding the battle of Marathon in 490 BC. The main problems with this topic are that there are no primary sources that document what the Frieze was supposed to mean. The scenes are not specific to any one type of procession. The argument against a Panathenaic festival is that there are soldiers and chariots represented. Possibly that biggest problem with interpreting the Frieze is that part of it is missing and it could be that the piece that is missing ties everything together. The Parthenon may have been the only ancient Greek temple with an exterior sculpture that depicts any kind of religious ritual or service. Because the theme of the frieze is unique we can not turn towards other relief sculpture to help us understand it.
    [Show full text]
  • Bronze Mirrors
    212 Bronze Mirrors François Louis Twenty-nine bronze mirrors were recovered from various locations at the wreck site. At the time of discovery most of the mirrors were covered by calcareous sediment, and their surfaces had corroded. Many have turned black. Originally, the mirrors were mostly silver to allow for a highly reflective surface. To achieve such a bright color, casters added more tin to the bronze alloy. On average, Tang mirrors are made of a bronze that is composed of 69 percent copper, 25 percent tin, and 5.3 percent lead.1 The mirrors from the Belitung shipwreck feature a panorama of shapes and designs popular in Tang China. Most of them are standard types that were commercially produced and widely traded. But the group also included two surprising pieces: an antique mirror from the Han era (206 BCE–220 CE), and a never-before-seen Tang mirror, whose inscription identifies it as one of the famed specimens cast on the Yangzi River in Yangzhou, a so-called Yangxin or Jiangxin mirror. The Belitung mirrors offer a rare glimpse into a commercial inventory of the early ninth century, the various designs and sizes reflecting different price categories and tastes. About a quarter of the mirrors are of restrained, modest design, with shallow floral reliefs or simple concentric lines on the back. Others, such as the four square mirrors that now look entirely plain, originally may have been splendidly decorated with ivory, mother-of-pearl, or gold and silver inlays in black lacquer. These would have catered to the more affluent customers, as did the heavy, sumptuous, so-called lion-and-grapevine mirrors.
    [Show full text]
  • Clothing in Ancient Greece Edited
    Clothing in ancient Greece Clothing in ancient Greece and Rome was generally created out of large, single pieces of fabric. Several different pieces of clothing could be worn in various combinations to create multiple outfits. The fabric was also draped, belted and pinned into various styles. In art, it is sometimes very difficult to differentiate the various garments worn as they all seem to be billowy drapes of fabric. In Greece, women usually wore one of two garments on a regular basis. One was the peplos, a style of dress made from a single piece of fabric that is folded over at the top, wrapped around the body and pinned up at the shoulders. Folding down the top created a second layer of fabric that ran down the back and the front of the garment, which was referred to as an apoptygma. The other piece of clothing was worn by both men and women, and was called a chiton. The chiton was very similar to the peplos, except without the apoptygma. This was created by a single piece of fabric wrapped around the body and pinned up on the shoulders, or by two pieces of fabric sewn up both sides with space left for armholes. The men wore a shorter version of the chiton. This, too, could be belted or left as-is. The pins that were often used to hold up these garments worked very similarly to safety pins or brooches, and were called fibulae. The other important piece of clothing for both men and women was called the himation.
    [Show full text]
  • A HISTORY of the PELASGIAN THEORY. FEW Peoples Of
    A HISTORY OF THE PELASGIAN THEORY. FEW peoples of the ancient world have given rise to so much controversy as the Pelasgians; and of few, after some centuries of discussion, is so little clearly established. Like the Phoenicians, the Celts, and of recent years the Teutons, they have been a peg upon which to hang all sorts of speculation ; and whenever an inconvenient circumstance has deranged the symmetry of a theory, it has been safe to ' call it Pelasgian and pass on.' One main reason for this ill-repute, into which the Pelasgian name has fallen, has been the very uncritical fashion in which the ancient statements about the Pelasgians have commonly been mishandled. It has been the custom to treat passages from Homer, from Herodotus, from Ephorus, and from Pausanias, as if they were so many interchangeable bricks to build up the speculative edifice; as if it needed no proof that genealogies found sum- marized in Pausanias or Apollodorus ' were taken by them from poems of the same class with the Theogony, or from ancient treatises, or from prevalent opinions ;' as if, further, ' if we find them mentioning the Pelasgian nation, they do at all events belong to an age when that name and people had nothing of the mystery which they bore to the eyes of the later Greeks, for instance of Strabo;' and as though (in the same passage) a statement of Stephanus of Byzantium about Pelasgians in Italy ' were evidence to the same effect, perfectly unexceptionable and as strictly historical as the case will admit of 1 No one doubts, of course, either that popular tradition may transmit, or that late writers may transcribe, statements which come from very early, and even from contemporary sources.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SCIJLPTURE FOUND in 1933 Plates IV and V
    THE SCIJLPTURE FOUND IN 1933 Plates IV and V Th-e campaign of 1933 was particularly productive in the field of sculpture yielding important marbles of both the Greek and the Roniaii periods. A series of the better preserved and more interesting pieces is selected for presentation in this preliminary report in continuation of the reports of the discoveries of sculpture in 1931 and 1932 puiblished in Volume II of Hesperia. A DRAPED FEMALE FIGURE A life-sized marble statue of a woman was found in the great drain in Section Eta of the E1xcavations.1 The figure is represented as standing on a base with the weight resting on the right leg and with the left knee slightly bent (Fig. 1). The head, which was made in a separate piece and was inset in a roughly picked socket, has disappeared, and both forearms are missing. The left arm was bent at the elbow, and the forearm, wA-hichhad been attached by a dowel, was thrust forward in a horizontal position. The right arm is broken away a.t a poinit above the elbow but the remains of a dowel hole in the break suggest that this forearm may also have been extended. The left knee and the front of the leg below it have been broken. The woman wears an Ionic chiton as an undergarment of which the sleeve fastenings atre visible along the upper arms. The outer garment is the Doric peplos which is fastened by clasps on both shoulders. The overhanging fold of the peplos is bound by a belt about the waist, and on each side the material is pulled out over the belt.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury (Mythology) 1 Mercury (Mythology)
    Mercury (mythology) 1 Mercury (mythology) Silver statuette of Mercury, a Berthouville treasure. Ancient Roman religion Practices and beliefs Imperial cult · festivals · ludi mystery religions · funerals temples · auspice · sacrifice votum · libation · lectisternium Priesthoods College of Pontiffs · Augur Vestal Virgins · Flamen · Fetial Epulones · Arval Brethren Quindecimviri sacris faciundis Dii Consentes Jupiter · Juno · Neptune · Minerva Mars · Venus · Apollo · Diana Vulcan · Vesta · Mercury · Ceres Mercury (mythology) 2 Other deities Janus · Quirinus · Saturn · Hercules · Faunus · Priapus Liber · Bona Dea · Ops Chthonic deities: Proserpina · Dis Pater · Orcus · Di Manes Domestic and local deities: Lares · Di Penates · Genius Hellenistic deities: Sol Invictus · Magna Mater · Isis · Mithras Deified emperors: Divus Julius · Divus Augustus See also List of Roman deities Related topics Roman mythology Glossary of ancient Roman religion Religion in ancient Greece Etruscan religion Gallo-Roman religion Decline of Hellenistic polytheism Mercury ( /ˈmɜrkjʉri/; Latin: Mercurius listen) was a messenger,[1] and a god of trade, the son of Maia Maiestas and Jupiter in Roman mythology. His name is related to the Latin word merx ("merchandise"; compare merchant, commerce, etc.), mercari (to trade), and merces (wages).[2] In his earliest forms, he appears to have been related to the Etruscan deity Turms, but most of his characteristics and mythology were borrowed from the analogous Greek deity, Hermes. Latin writers rewrote Hermes' myths and substituted his name with that of Mercury. However, there are at least two myths that involve Mercury that are Roman in origin. In Virgil's Aeneid, Mercury reminds Aeneas of his mission to found the city of Rome. In Ovid's Fasti, Mercury is assigned to escort the nymph Larunda to the underworld.
    [Show full text]
  • Baring the Female Shoulder in Ancient Greece
    Baring the Female Shoulder in Ancient Greece Duchess Andromeda Lykaina∗ ∗[email protected], https://andromedaofsparta.wordpress.com/ 1 1 Introduction A version of a garment in which the wearer bares one shoulder existed in Ancient Greece without doubt, but it appears to be constructed quite differently than its modern interpretations. Further, it seems to have been used sparingly and in very specific circumstances for women. We are using the broad period of Ancient Greece here as our examples are drawn from the Archaic (800 BCE - 480 BCE), Classical (480 BCE - 323 BCE), and Hellenistic (323 BCE - 146 BCE) periods. While garments differed in subtle ways across these periods, there is enough cohesion to allow us to recognize the same garment in different centuries. We will argue that the appearance of the one-shouldered chiton indicated a sharp departure from standard female behavior in proper Greek society, and we have constructed an example that closely resembles a particular instance of the garment in period. Note that the nature of the garment in most of the scenarios in which it appears lends itself to being simple and functional. Our goal in constructing an example is to show an authentic construction rather than to create a fancy garment. The rest of this work is organized as follows: x2 will present an overview of common garments in Ancient Greece so that we might put the one-shouldered chiton in context; x3 presents what evidence we have found of its appearance on women in the literary and archeological record; and x4 will present an argument as to its construction and an explanation of the example we have constructed.
    [Show full text]