DOCSLIB.ORG

Olimpiada Digitala 2021 (Romania)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Olimpiada Digitala 2021 (Romania) Olimpiada Digitala 2021 (Romania) Competition statistics: 581 competitors, 410 schools Exciting prizes for this CONTEST! KIT Robot inteligent programabil KIT proiecte Arduino Carte programare Scratch Locul 1 Locul 2 Locul 3 Open, 7 and 8 y.o. 1. Chirilov Albert Andrei, Scoala Nr 85, Bucuresti, Romania, 3.35, Congratulations!, Locul 1 , Project 2. Alecu Roberto Alessandro, Tecfun Jr, Botosani, Romania, 2.96, Congratulations!, Locul 2 , Project 3. Ganea Andrei Sebastian, Liceul Teoretic Avram Iancu Cluj Napoca, Cluj Napoca, Romania, 2.93, Congratulations!, Locul 3 , Project 4. Alice Caruntu, Scoala Gimnaziala Ioan Murariu Cristinesti, Botosani, Romania, 2.92, Thank you for participating 5. Mara Malusel, Scoala nr. 23 Constantin Brancoveanu, Constanta, Romania, 2.88, Congratulations!, Scenariu exceptional ! 6. Crisan Tudor Andrei, Scoala Gimnaziala Viisoara, Campia Turzii, Romania, 2.80, Thank you for participating 7. Matei Bica, Codeland School, Curtea De Arges, Romania, 2.73, Thank you for participating 8. Decu Dumitru Damian, Scoala Gimnaziala Nr 1 Berceni, Vidra, Romania, 2.68, Thank you for participating 9. Eliza Iftime, Techfun Jr, Botosani, Romania, 2.55, Thank you for participating 10. Voica Dimitrie, Techfun Jr, Botosani, Romania, 2.32, Thank you for participating 11. Poenaru Mihai Cristian, Codeland School, Pitesti, Romania, 1.00, Thank you for participating 12. Neaga Luca, Codeland School, Pitesti, Romania, 1.00, Thank you for participating 13. Isabela Maria Paceagiu, Isabela Maria Paceagiu, Constanta, Romania, 1.00, Thank you for participating 14. Crisan Tudor Andrei, Scoala Gimnaziala Viisoara, Campia Turzii, Romania, 1.00, Thank you for participating 15. Marin Vlad Mihai, Scoala Gimnaziala Mihai Viteazul, Craiova, Romania, 1.00, Thank you for participating 16. Bogdan Elisei Andreas, Palatul Copiilor Bistrita, Bistrita, Romania, 0.01, Thank you for participating 17. Dunca Patrick David, Ion Agarbiceanu, Cluj Napoca, Romania, 0.01, Thank you for participating 18. * Iordache David Mihai, Colegiul National Elena Cuza, Bucuresti, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded 19. * Calin Andrei Tanase, Codeland School, Mioveni, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded 20. * Baiesan Oana, Scoala Gimnaziala Ion Breazu Mihalt, Mihalt, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded Open, 9 and 10 y.o. 21. Dumitru Bogdan Gabriel, Codeland School, Pitesti, Romania, 3.62, Congratulations!, Locul 1 , Project 22. Ion Vlad, Codeland School, Pitesti, Romania, 3.54, Congratulations!, Locul 2 , Project 23. Luca Petrosanu Seracin, Mindhub, Bucuresti, Romania, 3.52, Congratulations!, Locul 3 , Project 24. Faraga Stefan, Liceul Teoretic Lucian Blaga, Cluj Napoca, Romania, 3.47, Congratulations!, Animatie exceptionala ! 25. Ghitulescu Flavia, Codeland School, Pitesti, Romania, 3.46, Thank you for participating 26. Florean David Cristian, Palatul Copiilor Bistrita, Bistrita, Romania, 3.30, Thank you for participating 27. Ciobanu Onofras Yannis Mihai, Colegiul Tehnologic Spiru Haret Municipiul Piatra Neamt, Piatra Neamt, Romania, 3.26, Congratulations!, Animatie exceptionala ! 28. Iliescu Ianis Mihai, Codeland school, Mioveni, Romania, 3.20, Thank you for participating 29. Catalina Mihai Alexandru, Iotesa Kids, TIMISOARA, Romania, 3.18, Thank you for participating 30. Raul Orban, Liceul Teoretic Ioan Pascu Codlea, Codlea, Romania, 3.17, Thank you for participating 31. Melancioiu Ioan, Codeland School, Pitesti, Romania, 3.17, Thank you for participating 32. Boca Oana Alessandra, Scoala Gimnaziala Tudor Vladimirescu, Targu Mures, Romania, 3.08, Thank you for participating 33. Dumitru Matei, Codeland School, Mioveni, Romania, 3.06, Thank you for participating 34. Amiala Posea, Metropolitan Arc School, Bucharest, Romania, 3.03, Thank you for participating 35. Albu Alexia, Palatul Copiilor Targoviste - Filiala Moreni, Moreni, Romania, 2.89, Thank you for participating 36. Mailat Diana, Scoala Gimnaziala Liviu Rebreanu, Tirgu Mures, Romania, 2.88, Thank you for participating 37. Lorena Caruntu, Scoala Gimnaziala Ioan Murariu Cristinesti, Botosani, Romania, 2.85, Thank you for participating 38. Erika Chiritescu, Centrul Judetean De Excelenta Vaslui, Vaslui, Romania, 2.81, Thank you for participating 39. Elena Maria Fericean, Seminarul Teologic Ortodox, Cluj Napoca, Romania, 2.77, Thank you for participating 40. Dinu Octavian, Codeland School, Mioveni, Romania, 2.77, Thank you for participating 41. Arzoiu Denisa, Scoala Gimnaziala Sfantul Nicolae Pietrosita, Pietrosita, Romania, 2.74, Thank you for participating 42. SUSNEA RADU MIHAIL, Codeland School, Mioveni, Romania, 2.70, Thank you for participating 43. Ionescu Stefan, Palatul Copiilor Bistrita, Bistrita, Romania, 2.68, Thank you for participating 44. Poenaru Cristina Maria, Codeland School, Pitesti, Romania, 2.66, Thank you for participating 45. SUSNEA MIRA IOANA, Codeland School, Mioveni, Romania, 2.60, Thank you for participating 46. Mortocean Bogdan, Clubu Copiilor, Sighetu Marmatiei, Romania, 2.48, Thank you for participating 47. Nechifor Daria Elena, Metropolitana Gimnaziala Arc, Bucuresti, Romania, 2.45, Thank you for participating 48. Stoian Victor Andrei, Codeland School, Bucuresti, Romania, 2.44, Thank you for participating 49. Chiriac Elena Beatrice, Scoala Gimnaziala Nr 5 Piatra Neamt, Piatra Neamt, Romania, 2.43, Thank you for participating 50. Natalia Sofia Bostina, Codeland School, Pitesti, Romania, 2.41, Thank you for participating 51. Grigor Daria Andreea, Clubul Copiilor, Sighetu Marmatiei, Romania, 2.41, Thank you for participating 52. Matei Smatoc, Liceul Tehnologic Nr 1 Fundulea, Bucuresti, Romania, 2.34, Thank you for participating 53. Alex Pop, Winnie Academy, Oradea, Romania, 2.30, Thank you for participating 54. Mihai Murgeanu, Scoala Emil Atanasiu Garoafa, Focsani, Romania, 2.28, Congratulations!, Animatie exceptionala ! 55. Tudor Antoci, Colegiul National Garabet Ibraileanu, Iasi, Romania, 2.24, Thank you for participating 56. Grancea Petru, Scoala Metropolitana Academia Romana A Copiilor, Bucharest, Romania, 2.23, Thank you for participating 57. Ungureanu Alin, Colegiul National Costache Negri Galati, Galati, Romania, 2.19, Thank you for participating 58. Ienci Elisabeta, Palatul Copiilor Bistrita, Bistrita, Romania, 2.08, Thank you for participating 59. Sarbu Andrei Fabian, Scoala Mihai Viteazul Galati, Galati, Romania, 2.05, Thank you for participating 60. Olaru Buchir Maximus Andrei, Tecfun Jr, Botosani, Romania, 2.03, Thank you for participating 61. Cretu Traian, Scoala Montessori Medias, Medias, Romania, 2.03, Thank you for participating 62. Diaconu Petru Vladimir, Scoala Gimnaziala Mihai Viteazul, Craiova, Romania, 1.92, Thank you for participating 63. Balba Elena, Tech Fun Junior, Botosani, Romania, 1.87, Thank you for participating 64. Olinic Ayaan, Techfun Jr, Botosani, Romania, 1.49, Thank you for participating 65. Noajba Lavinia Maria, Palatul Copiilor, Drobeta Turnu Severin, Romania, 1.00, Thank you for participating 66. Grigoras David Andrei, Scoala Stefan Barsanescu Iasi, Iasi, Romania, 1.00, Thank you for participating 67. Neculau Darius, Techfun Jr, Botosani, Romania, 1.00, Thank you for participating 68. Tudor Birdacel, Scoala Gimnaziala Mihai Viteazul Craiova, Craiova, Romania, 1.00, Thank you for participating 69. Vadim Simakin, Gymnasium 39, Ufa, Romania, 1.00, Thank you for participating 70. Apetri Ilie Rares Ioan, Scoala Gimnaziala Nr 5 Piatra Neamt, Piatra Neamt, Romania, 0.01, Thank you for participating 71. Maris Raul Stefan, Liceul Teoretic O C Taslauanu, Toplta, Romania, 0.01, Thank you for participating 72. Dragan Andreas, Colegiul National Elena Cuza, Bucharest, Romania, 0.01, Thank you for participating 73. Bogdan Samuel Amir, Palatul Copiilor Bistrita, Bistrita, Romania, 0.01, Thank you for participating 74. Sfiriac Timeea, Palatul Copiilor Bistrita, Bistrita, Romania, 0.01, Thank you for participating 75. Nastasa Akexia Maria, Techfun Jr, Botosani, Romania, 0.01, Thank you for participating 76. Sasha Venedict, Techfun Jr, Botosani, Romania, 0.01, Thank you for participating 77. * Coravu Andrei Victor, Scoala Gimnaziala Traian, Craiova, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded 78. * Arthur Matei Lutsch, Liceul Tehnologic Grigore Moisil, Targu Lapus, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded 79. * Dragos Matica, Colegiul National Vasile Godis Arad, Arad, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded 80. * Stoia David, Scoala Nicolae Titulescu, Cluj Napoca, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded 81. * Arzoiu Denisa, Scoala Gimnaziala Sfantul Nicolae Pietrosita, Targoviste, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded 82. * Voican David Constantin, Codeland School, Mioveni, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded 83. * Dragomirescu Irina, Codeland School, Mioveni, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded 84. * Giban Mario Gabriel, Codeland School, Pitesti, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded 85. * Surdu Livia Mihaela, Scoala Gimnaziala, Bucharest, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded 86. * Andrei Lujanschi, Scoala Gimnaziala Metropolitana Arc, Bucharest, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded 87. * Sandru Danut, Scoala Gimnaziala Metropolitana Arc, Bucuresti, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded 88. * Preda Nicole Anastasia, Scoala Metropolitana Gimnaziala Arc, Bucharest, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded 89. * Matei Lupu, Scoala Gimnaziala Metropolitana Arc, Bucharest, Romania, 0.00, Submission deadline exceeded 90. * Dumitru Denis Ionut Florin, Codeland School, Mioveni, Romania,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Romanian Presidency Programme V2
    Teatrul Naţional din Iaşi Biblioteca Judeţeană „V.A. Urechia” Galaţi Public Domain Marked ROMANIAN PRESIDENCY OF THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION “Exposing Online the European Cultural Heritage: the impact of Cultural Heritage on the Digital Transformation of the Society” 17-18 April 2019 | Iasi, Romania europeana.eu @EuropeanaEU ROMANIAN PRESIDENCY OF THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Context This conference, organized in the framework of the Romanian Presidency of the Council of the European Union and under the auspicies of Europeana Initiative, aims to highlight the impact of exposing cultural heritage online and to provide a platform to discuss the importance of national aggregation infrastructures to the digital transformation of cultural heritage sector using Romania as a case study. The meeting is aimed at cultural policy makers from EU member states (representatives from the Expert Group on Digital Cultural Heritage and Europeana), Romanian cultural heritage institutions involved in the implementation of E-cultura: Romanian Digital Library project and policy makers. The meeting will be joined by representatives of the European Commission and Romanian authorities. Central hypothesis Europe currently has a leading position in the world in digital cultural heritage. This leading position has been built through large investments of the EU (in Europeana and related projects) and of the Member States (in digitization and national infrastructures). Securing this leading position in the future, in particular with the advent of new technologies
    [Show full text]
  • A Sample of Cultural Interaction in the Age of Modernism:The Representation of the Dobruja Turk in Romanian Painting
    ANKARAD / AJARS ANKARA ANADOLU VE RUMELİ ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ ANKARA’ S JOURNAL OF ANATOLIA AND RUMELIA STUDIES ANKARAD, 2020; 1(2): 481-501 [email protected] e-ISSN: 2717-9052 DOI: A SAMPLE OF CULTURAL INTERACTION IN THE AGE OF MODERNISM:THE REPRESENTATION OF THE DOBRUJA TURK IN ROMANIAN PAINTING Atanas KARACOBAN* - Dalila OZBAY** Abstract: The present study attempts to bring to light an artistic experience almost unknown to the larger public, which is the repre­ sentation of the Turkish people of Dobruja in the Romanian painting of the first half of the twentieth century, which is the period of modernism in art promoting freedom of artistic expression, innova­ tion and experimentation. Among the origins of modernism, of pri­ mary importance stand the principles of romanticism, aestheticism, symbolism, and particularly in the case of painting, Impressionism, and the entire late nineteenth-century artistic reaction against real­ ism and tradition. Along with these predecessors, in the case of Ro­ manian artists, the rediscovery of Dobruca was another factor providing new concerns and perspectives in painting. The authors of this study are therefore also conscious of the influence of the Turkish community from Dobruja on the development of Romanian painting in the new context of territorial changes after the second Balkan War, the emphasis on which being another aim of the pre­ sent study. 481 Key words: Art, Painting, Modernism, Impressionism, Dobruja. MODERNİZM ÇAĞINDA KÜLTÜREL ETKİLEŞİMİN BİR ÖRNEĞİ: ROMANYA RESMİNDE DOBRUCA TÜRK’ÜNÜN BİR TASVİRİ Öz: Bu çalışma, halkın çoğunluğu tarafından bilinmeyen bir sanatsal deneyime; sanatsal dışavurum, yenilik ve deneyselliği destekleyen, sanatta bir modernleşme çağı olan yirminci yüzyılın ilk yarısındaki Romen resmindeki Dobrucalı Türklerin resmedilmesine * Öğr.
    [Show full text]
  • Unification of Art Theories (Uat) - a Long Manifesto
    UNIFICATION OF ART THEORIES (UAT) - A LONG MANIFESTO - by FLORENTIN SMARANDACHE ABSTRACT. “Outer-Art” is a movement set up as a protest against, or to ridicule, the random modern art which states that everything is… art! It was initiated by Florentin Smarandache, in 1990s, who ironically called for an upside-down artwork: to do art in a way it is not supposed to be done, i.e. to make art as ugly, as silly, as wrong as possible, and generally as impossible as possible! He published three such (outer-)albums, the second one called “oUTER-aRT, the Worst Possible Art in the World!” (2002). FLORENTIN SMARANDACHE Excerpts from his (outer-)art theory: <The way of how not to write, which is an emblem of paradoxism, was later on extended to the way of how not to paint, how not to design, how to not sculpture, until the way of how not to act, or how not to sing, or how not to perform on the stage – thus: all reversed. Only negative adjectives are cumulated in the outer- art: utterly awful and uninteresting art; disgusting, execrable, failure art; garbage paintings: from crumpled, dirty, smeared, torn, ragged paper; using anti-colors and a-colors; naturalist paintings: from wick, spit, urine, feces, any waste matter; misjudged art; self-discredited, ignored, lousy, stinky, hooted, chaotic, vain, lazy, inadequate art (I had once misspelled 'rat' instead of 'art'); obscure, unremarkable, syncopal art; para-art; deriding art expressing inanity and emptiness; strange, stupid, nerd art, in-deterministic, incoherent, dull, uneven art... as made by any monkey!… the worse the better!> 2 A MANIFESTO AND ANTI-MANIFESTO FOR OUTER-ART I was curious to learn new ideas/ schools /styles/ techniques/ movements in arts and letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Licitația Maeștri Ai Portretului Marți, 6 Februarie 2018, 19.30, Artmark - Palatul Cesianu - Racoviță, București
    16. Mișu Teișanu, În grădină Licitația Maeștri ai Portretului marți, 6 februarie 2018, 19.30, Artmark - Palatul Cesianu - Racoviță, București 94 95 1 | Iosif Iser 2 | Hans Eder 1881, București - 1958, Bucureşti 1883, Braşov - 1955, Braşov Tătăroaice | 1939 Tătăroaică | 1947 guaşă vernisată pe hârtie, 42 × 34 cm, semnat şi datat ulei pe carton, 70 × 50 cm, semnat și datat dreapta sus, stânga sus, cu negru, „ISER, (19)39” cu negru, „HE, (19)47” € 3.000 - 5.000 € 3.000 - 5.000 96 97 3 | Carol Hübner 1902, Sighişoara - 1981, Brașov Pisica albă | 1928 ulei pe carton, 48 × 35 cm, semnat și datat dreapta jos, cu galben, în monogramă, „KH, 1928” € 700 - 1.200 4 | Nicolae Popa-Iași 1901, Ipatele, Iaşi - 1962, Iaşi Cochetărie | 1932 5 | Carol Hübner ulei pe pânză lipită pe placaj, 60 × 47 cm, semnat, datat 1902, Sighişoara - 1981, Brașov şi localizat stânga jos, cu brun, „N. Popa, Paris, (1)932” Culegătoarele de vreascuri | 1931 € 800 - 1.500 ulei pe pânză, 58 × 48,5 cm, semnat și datat dreapta jos, cu brun, Khübner, (19)31 Opera a fost pictată în cursul anului 1932, în atelierul lui € 900 - 1.500 André Lhote, pe când Nicolae Popa se afla la Paris, drept câștigător al bursei pentru studii în străinătate. Opera a participat la Salonul artiștilor moldoveni, Academia Opera a participat la expoziția retrospectivă Karl Hübner Pe verso: Portret de doamnă. de Arte Frumoase Iași, 27 decembrie 1932 - 15 ianua- (1902-1981), Muzeul de Artă Brașov, 2012 și este repro- rie 1933. dusă în catalogul expoziției la pag. 52. 98 99 Sculptor școlit în perioada interbelică, între 1930 și 1934, în cadrul Academiei de Arte Frumoase din București, Mereanu avea să debuteze în deceniul patru al sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonitza and the Great War: Soldier, Prisoner, Reporter and Artist
    TONITZA AND THE GREAT WAR: SOLDIER, PRISONER, REPORTER AND ARTIST Andra Tonitza1 Rezumat: Primul Război Mondial a mobilizat peste 66 de milioane de oameni din toată Europa și din coloniile marilor puteri. Bărbaţi de toate vârstele și categoriile sociale au devenit soldaţi, uneori împotriva voinţei și contrar convingerilor lor pacifiste. Fenomen rar până atunci – artiști și scriitori s-au găsit pe câmpul de luptă și în lagărele de prizonieri, fiind martori sau victime ale celor mai teribile atrocităţi ale războiului de tip nou: un război industrializat și global. Ca mulţi alţi soldaţi, Nicolae Tonitza (1886-1940) a fost înrolat și forţat să îndure ravagiile războiului. Ca soldat și apoi ca prizonier pentru mai mult de 18 luni, odată revenit în România, nu a încetat să evoce ororile suferite și condiţiile de viaţă lamentabile pe care a trebuit să le îndure, alături de mulţi alţii. Dar nu s-a oprit aici. S-a străduit să denunţe „războiul de după război”. Într-adevăr, consecințele sociale generate de Primul Război Mondial s-au perpetuat ani întregi, afectând multe segmente de populație, mai ales pe cei mai săraci. Această dorință de a aduce la lumină războiul și consecințele sale devastatoare a devenit o adevărată direcție de creație, plasând omul în centrul preocupărilor și dând artistului posibilitatea de a fi stăpânul propriilor sale gânduri. Keywords: World War One, Nicolae Tonitza, art, humanism, sublimation. The People’s participation in the State Affairs is the decisive cause of the ruthless, hyperbolic character of the revolutionary wars, unlike the lace-like wars waged by the European cabinets in the midst of the popular indifference.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanian Art Society - a Landmark of the Autochthonous Aesthetics in 1918
    I N T E R N A T I O NA L CO N F E R E N C E RCIC’18 Redefining Community in Intercultural Context Bucharest, 17-19 May 2018 ROMANIAN ART SOCIETY - A LANDMARK OF THE AUTOCHTHONOUS AESTHETICS IN 1918 Cristina GELAN Music, Theater and Visual Arts Faculty, “Ovidius” University, Constanţa, Romania Abstract: On March 9, 1918, the Romanian Art Society was founded in Bucharest. This was an organization that appeared as a form of protest at the proposal of an authorized artistic force of the time, the Artistic Youth Society, addressed to the artists who were mobilized by the Great General Headquarters of the Romanian Army in Iasi to participate in the great exhibition that they organized in April 1918. Revolted by the academic-romantic-idyllic spirit, reflected in the works of the representatives of the Artistic Youth Society, out at the issues of daily life, artists such as Ştefan Dimitrescu, Camil Ressu, Nicolae Tonitza, I. Ştefănescu, Ion Theodorescu- Sion, Nicolae Dărăscu, Alexis Macedonski, Ionescu Doru, Oscar Han and Traian Cornescu wanted to create an artistic bastion that would provide them with a framework where their aspirations can be revealed and offer them the legitimacy to seek a line of expansion and deepening of the ways of expression specific to Romanian art. During the period 1918 - 1924, the Romanian Art Society became the main attraction of the ideals of the artists who were mobilized on the front of the First World War and who contributed to the realization of works of art, of a high artistic level, grounded in the surrounding reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghid EN Web.Pdf
    Guide financed by Braşov County Council Written and devised: Radu Popica Proof: Simona Tătaru Photos: Nicolae Panaite , Răzvan Precup, Radu Tătaru, Árpád Udvardi DTP: Radu Tătaru English version: Alice Haţegan ISBN 978-606-93303-6-4 Cover: Ştefan Luchian, Anemone The National Gallery 1* comprises a selection of artworks (paintings and sculpture) which are representative for Romanian modern art. The exhibition illustrates the evolution of Transylvanian painting between the 18th and the 19th centuries and Romanian art from the first half of the19th century through to post-war years. Alongside the masterpieces of the Romanian art masters, the exhibition also includes the artworks of the artists active in Braşov, from the Saxon patriciate portraits to the contemporary artist’s creations. The Portrait of Joseph von Drauth (1709-1762), senator of the city of Braşov, painted by Johann Ölhan the Elder (?-1763), opens the exhibition. [ST] The painting is typical for Saxon patriciate portraiture, a provincial variant of portrait d`apparat. The artist insists on the details which indicate that the commissioner boasted a high social status (coat of arms, apparel, as well as on the objects which suggest the official duties he exercised. The City Hall and the buildings surrounding it, depicted in the background of the portrait, are also meant to illustrate his position. But the posture of the model is conventional and artificial. We find the same interest in underlining the social position of the model in the creation of an anonymous artist active in the late 1700s, who painted the Portrait of Oprea Ţârcă, the head of the shepherds’guild of Săcele.
    [Show full text]
  • Arhive Personale Şi Familiale
    Arhive personale şi familiale Vol. 1 Repertoriu arhivistic 2 ISBN 973-8308-04-6 3 ARHIVELE NAŢIONALE ALE ROMÂNIEI Arhive personale şi familiale Vol. I Repertoriu arhivistic Autor: Filofteia Rînziş Bucureşti 2001 4 • Redactor: Ioana Alexandra Negreanu • Au colaborat: Florica Bucur, Nataşa Popovici, Anuţa Bichir • Indici de arhive, antroponimic, toponimic: Florica Bucur, Nataşa Popovici • Traducere: Margareta Mihaela Chiva • Culegere computerizată: Filofteia Rînziş • Tehnoredactare şi corectură: Nicoleta Borcea, Otilia Biton • Coperta: Filofteia Rînziş • Coperta 1: Alexandru Marghiloman, Alexandra Ghica Ion C. Brătianu, Alexandrina Gr. Cantacuzino • Coperta 4: Constantin Argetoianu, Nicolae Iorga Sinaia, iulie 1931 Cartea a apărut cu sprijinul Ministerului Culturii şi Cultelor 5 CUPRINS Introducere……………………………….7 Résumé …………………………………..24 Lista abrevierilor ……………………….29 Arhive personale şi familiale……………30 Bibliografie…………………………….298 Indice de arhive………………………...304 Indice antroponimic……………………313 Indice toponimic……………………….356 6 INTRODUCERE „…avem marea datorie să dăm şi noi arhivelor noastre întreaga atenţie ce o merită, să adunăm şi să organizăm pentru posteritate toate categoriile de material arhivistic, care pot să lămurească generaţiilor viitoare viaţa actuală a poporului român în toată deplinătatea lui.” Constantin Moisil Prospectarea trecutului istoric al poporului român este o condiţie esenţială pentru siguranţa viitorului politic, economic şi cultural al acestuia. Evoluţia unei societăţi, familii sau persoane va putea fi conturată
    [Show full text]
  • Paintings Signed by Vasile Grigore in Lelia Pop Collection
    Collectors A Passion for Art MINISTRY OF CULTURE AND NATIONAL HERITAGE VASILE GRIGORE, PAINTER AND ART COLLECTOR ART MUSEUM Collectors A Passion for Art Eugenia Florescu • Viorel Rău Armand Voicu • Lelia Pop „[Art] is human not only because it was invented by people, but also because it exists only with the hand of people... Homage… It is as complex as the universe; at the same time art is unique, like human beings; it offers huge possibilities, as it explores – due to the power of image – the human condition. It is a continuance of human kind.” Elie Faure ost of the great museums in the world were created around private collections. Subsequently, they enriched M their patrimony through donations and purchases, and this is an ongoing process nowadays, too. The art collectors, with less material resources or billionaires, have invested their fortune in acquiring paintings, sculptures, graphics, decorative art, leaving to the world true masterpieces and connecting their names to them, at the same time. Antiquity records the collection of paintings exhibited in one of the wings of Propyleae – architectural wonders that guard the entrance to the Acropolis –, while the Ambrosian Painting Gallery in Milano was founded due to the donation made by cardinal Federico Borromeo in 1621, which included incunabula, paintings of Leonardo da Vinci, Botticelli, Rafael and others. After the French Revolution in 1789, the Louvre, home of the royal family for centuries, was transformed in 1793 in a national museum, which hosts mostly the art collections of the crowned heads of France. The same way, the renowned Italian museums were made starting with the collections donated by princes, dukes and important Italian merchants.
    [Show full text]
  • Luchian Și Independenții
    LUCHIAN ȘI INDEPENDENȚII PAVILIONUL MUZEAL GALERIILE KRETZULESCU, BUCUREȘTI, 2017 Curatori expoziție: Adina Rențea Iulian Pleștiu Catalog (texte): Valentin Ciucă Iulian Pleștiu Adina Rențea Traducere: Irina-Marina Borțoi Fotografii: Gabriel Ghizdavu Design & DTP: Iulian Pleștiu Veronica Dănilă Tipărit la: Everest Pavilionul Muzeal Luchian și Independenții Art Safari 2017 19 mai - 18 iunie 2017 Galeriile Kretzulescu, Calea Victoriei nr. 45 București Coperta I: Ștefan Luchian, Anemone, Colecție privată Coperta IV: Ștefan Luchian, Alecu Literatu, Colecție privată ISBN: 978-606-8605-71-5 © Art Safari 2017 Nicio parte din acest catalog nu poate fi reprodusă sau transmisă în niciun mod, sub nicio formă fără consimțământul scris al deținătorilor de copyright. - etaj 2 Kretzulescu Galeriile și Independenții, Luchian expoziției Planul 2 3 CUPRINS / CONTENTS Aducem mulțumiri muzeelor, instituțiilor culturale și colecționarilor particulari, fără suportul cărora acest proiect nu ar fi fost posibil: Complexul Muzeal Arad Complexul Muzeal „Iulian Antonescu”, Muzeul Judeţean de Artă Bacău Muzeul „Vasile Pârvan”, Bârlad Muzeul Judeţean Botoşani Muzeul de Artă Brașov Muzeul Național Tehnic „Prof. Ing. Dimitrie Leonida”, București Universitatea Națională de Arte București Banca Comercială Română Fundația Bonte Muzeul Memorial „Octavian Goga”, Ciucea Muzeul de Artă Cluj-Napoca Muzeul de Artă Craiova Muzeul de Artă Constanţa Muzeul Regiunii Porților de Fier, Drobeta Turnu-Severin Complexul Muzeal Național Moldova Iași - Muzeul de Artă Muzeul de Arta Vizuală Galați Muzeul Județean Mureș - Muzeul de Artă Muzeul Judeţean Argeş, Piteşti Muzeul Judeţean Prahova „Ion Ionescu-Quintus” Muzeul Județean „Aurelian Sacerdoțeanu”, Râmnicu Vâlcea Institutul de Cercetări Eco-Muzeale „Gavrilă Simion”, Tulcea Valentin Ciucă Valentin Ciucă Mulțumiri speciale părintelui paroh al Parohiei Bisericii Kretzulescu, 7 Luchian, contemporanul nostru 7 Luchian, our contemporary prof.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intercultural Challenge
    MOLESTO: Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi THE INTERCULTURAL CHALLENGE – ROMANIAN CULTURAL REPRESENTATIONS OF TURKISH IDENTITY Marina Cap-Bun1 Abstract Romanian culture developed a special interest for Oriental themes, embodied in various forms of artistic manifestations, so that, in time, a number of writers (Dimitrie Cantemir, Cilibi Moise, Anton Pann, Dimitrie Bolinineanu, Mihail Sadoveanu, Ion Barbu, Mateiu Caragiale, Eugen Barbu, Silviu Angelescu among them), dramatists (Ion Luca Caragiale, Victor Ion Popa), painters (Theodor Aman, Nicolae Tonitza), musicians (Dimitrie Cantemir, Anton Pann) have become well-known for being perceptibly attached to the Turkish world, and for the developing a specific lexis in order to praise the magnificence and wisdom of the Orient. Makale Bilgisi Keywords: Culture, Romania, Turkey, Dimitrie Cantemir Gönderildiği tarih: Romanian culture developed a special interest for Oriental themes, embodied 17.03.2019 in various forms of artistic manifestations, so that, in time, a number of writers Kabul edildiği tarih: (Dimitrie Cantemir, Cilibi Moise, Anton Pann, Dimitrie Bolinineanu, Mihail 02.07.2019 Yayınlanma tarihi: Sadoveanu, Ion Barbu, Mateiu Caragiale, Eugen Barbu, Silviu Angelescu among 30.07.2019 them), dramatists (Ion Luca Caragiale, Victor Ion Popa), painters (Theodor Aman, Nicolae Tonitza), musicians (Dimitrie Cantemir, Anton Pann) have become well- Article Info known for being perceptibly attached to the Turkish world, and for the developing a Date submitted: specific lexis in order to praise the magnificence and wisdom of the Orient. 17.03.2019 At the beginning of the nineteenth century, the influence of the European Date accepted: 02.07.2019 Romanticism enhanced this appeal of the exotic Oriental world, but, at the same Date published: time, brought about a strong emphasis on national identities, mainly manifested as 30.07.2019 glorification of the past, revival of the local myths and folk arts, portraying of the natural splendors of “the book of nature”, and intense, sometimes conflicting, emotions.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Orthodoxy & the Nation: Traditionalist Definitions Of
    BETWEEN ORTHODOXY AND THE NATION. TRADITIONALIST DEFINITIONS OF ROMANIANNESS IN INTERWAR ROMANIA By IonuĠ Florin BiliuĠă Submitted to Central European University History Department In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Assistant Professor Balázs Trencsènyi Second Reader: Assistant Professor Constantin Iordachi CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2007 Abstract The aim of the present thesis is to provide an analysis of the cultural debates of interwar Romania regarding the definition of the character of the Romanian ethnicity in connection with Orthodox spirituality and institutional Orthodoxy. This thesis will focus on the traditionalist side of the debate as depicted in the works of Nichifor Crainic (1889–1972) and Nae Ionescu (1890–1940). This paper goes between two definitions of Romanianness that introduce Orthodoxy in explaining its specificity. One (several) of Nichifor Crainic, an integrative cultural vortex that comprises traditional rural culture and Orthodoxy and a radicalized one of Nae Ionescu that conditioned the Romanianness to its direct link with Orthodoxy thus distinguishing between “true” Romanian and “good” Romanian. I have tried to account for the lack of dialogue between the promoters of these definitions and their legacy in Romanian culture. CEU eTD Collection Table of Contents Introduction .........................................................................................................................4 1. The Building of the Romanian Character. The cultural
    [Show full text]