DOCSLIB.ORG

Abstract Algebra Paul Garrett

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abstract Algebra Paul Garrett - Abstract Algebra Paul Garrett ii I covered this material in a two-semester graduate course in abstract algebra in 2004-05, rethinking the material from scratch, ignoring traditional prejudices. I wrote proofs which are natural outcomes of the viewpoint. A viewpoint is good if taking it up means that there is less to remember. Robustness, as opposed to fragility, is a desirable feature of an argument. It is burdensome to be clever. Since it is non-trivial to arrive at a viewpoint that allows proofs to seem easy, such a viewpoint is revisionist. However, this is a good revisionism, as opposed to much worse, destructive revisionisms which are nevertheless popular, most notably the misguided impulse to logical perfection [sic]. Logical streamlining is not the same as optimizing for performance. The worked examples are meant to be model solutions for many of the standard traditional exercises. I no longer believe that everyone is obliged to redo everything themselves. Hopefully it is possible to learn from others’ efforts. Paul Garrett June, 2007, Minneapolis Garrett: Abstract Algebra iii Introduction Abstract Algebra is not a conceptually well-defined body of material, but a conventional name that refers roughly to one of the several lists of things that mathematicians need to know to be competent, effective, and sensible. This material fits a two-semester beginning graduate course in abstract algebra. It is a how-to manual, not a monument to traditional icons. Rather than an encyclopedic reference, it tells a story, with plot-lines and character development propelling it forward. The main novelty is that most of the standard exercises in abstract algebra are given here as worked examples. Some additional exercises are given, which are variations on the worked examples. The reader might contemplate the examples before reading the solutions, but this is not mandatory. The examples are given to assist, not necessarily challenge. The point is not whether or not the reader can do the problems on their own, since all of these are at least fifty years old, but, rather, whether the viewpoint is assimilated. In particular, it often happens that a logically correct solution is conceptually regressive, and should not be considered satisfactory. I promote an efficient, abstract viewpoint whenever it is purposeful to abstract things, especially when letting go of appealing but irrelevant details is advantageous. Some things often not mentioned in an algebra course are included. Some naive set theory, developing ideas about ordinals, is occasionally useful, and the abstraction of this setting makes the set theory seem less farfetched or baffling than it might in a more elementary context. Equivalents of the Axiom of Choice are described. Quadratic reciprocity is useful in understanding quadratic and cyclotomic extensions of the rational numbers, and I give the proof by Gauss’ sums. An economical proof of Dirichlet’s theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions is included, with discussion of relevant complex analysis, since existence of primes satisfying linear congruence conditions comes up in practice. Other small enrichment topics are treated briefly at opportune moments in examples and exercises. Again, algebra is not a unified or linearly ordered body of knowledge, but only a rough naming convention for an ill-defined and highly variegated landscape of ideas. Further, as with all parts of the basic graduate mathematics curriculum, many important things are inevitably left out. For algebraic geometry or algebraic number theory, much more commutative algebra is useful than is presented here. Only vague hints of representation theory are detectable here. Far more systematic emphasis is given to finite fields, cyclotomic polynomials (divisors of xn 1), and cyclotomic fields than is usual, and less emphasis is given to abstract Galois theory. Ironically,− there are many more explicit Galois theory examples here than in sources that emphasize abstract Galois theory. After proving Lagrange’s theorem and the Sylow theorem, the pure theory of finite groups is not especially emphasized. After all, the Sylow theorem is not interesting because it allows classification of groups of small order, but because its proof illustrates group actions on sets, a ubiquitous mechanism in mathematics. A strong and recurring theme is the characterization of objects by (universal) mapping properties, rather than by goofy constructions. Nevertheless, formal category theory does not appear. A greater emphasis is put on linear and multilinear algebra, while doing little with general commutative algebra apart from Gauss’ lemma and Eisenstein’s criterion, which are immediately useful. Students need good role models for writing mathematics. This is a reason for the complete write-ups of solutions to many examples, since most traditional situations do not provide students with any models for solutions to the standard problems. This is bad. Even worse, lacking full solutions written by a practiced hand, inferior and regressive solutions may propagate. I do not always insist that students give solutions in the style I wish, but it is very desirable to provide beginners with good examples. The reader is assumed to have some prior acquaintance with introductory abstract algebra and linear algebra, not to mention other standard courses that are considered preparatory for graduate school. This is not so much for specific information as for maturity. iv Garrett: Abstract Algebra v Contents 1Theintegers ....................................... 1 1.1Uniquefactorization . .....1 1.2Irrationalities . .... 5 1.3 Z/m, the integers mod m ................................6 1.4Fermat’sLittleTheorem . .....8 1.5Sun-Ze’stheorem . 11 1.6Workedexamples . 12 2GroupsI........................................ 17 2.1Groups....................................... 17 2.2Subgroups,Lagrange’stheorem . ....... 19 2.3 Homomorphisms, kernels, normal subgroups . ........... 22 2.4Cyclicgroups.................................... 24 2.5Quotientgroups. 26 2.6Groupsactingonsets . .. 28 2.7TheSylowtheorem . 31 2.8Tryingtoclassifyfinitegroups,partI . .......... 34 2.9Workedexamples . 42 3Theplayers:rings,fields,etc. ........ 47 3.1Rings,fields .................................... 47 3.2Ringhomomorphisms . 50 3.3Vectorspaces,modules,algebras . ......... 52 3.4PolynomialringsI. .. 54 4CommutativeringsI. .. 61 4.1Divisibilityandideals . ..... 61 4.2 Polynomials in one variable over a field . .......... 62 4.3Idealsandquotients . ... 65 4.4Idealsandquotientrings . ..... 68 4.5Maximalidealsandfields. .... 69 4.6Primeidealsandintegraldomains . ........ 69 4.7Fermat-Euleronsumsoftwosquares . ....... 71 4.8Workedexamples . 73 5LinearAlgebraI:Dimension . ..... 79 5.1Somesimpleresults . .. 79 5.2Basesanddimension. .. 80 5.3Homomorphismsanddimension . ..... 82 vi 6FieldsI ........................................ 85 6.1Adjoiningthings . 85 6.2 Fields of fractions, fields of rational functions . ................ 88 6.3Characteristics,finitefields . ........ 90 6.4Algebraicfieldextensions. ...... 92 6.5Algebraicclosures . ... 96 7SomeIrreduciblePolynomials. ....... 99 7.1Irreduciblesoverafinitefield . ....... 99 7.2Workedexamples . 102 8Cyclotomicpolynomials . 105 8.1Multiplefactorsinpolynomials . ........ 105 8.2Cyclotomicpolynomials . 107 8.3Examples...................................... 110 8.4Finitesubgroupsoffields . 113 8.5 Infinitude of primes p = 1 mod n ...........................113 8.6Workedexamples . 114 9Finitefields....................................... 119 9.1Uniqueness..................................... 119 9.2Frobeniusautomorphisms . 120 9.3Countingirreducibles . 123 10ModulesoverPIDs. 125 10.1Thestructuretheorem . 125 10.2Variations..................................... 126 10.3Finitely-generatedabeliangroups . ........... 128 10.4Jordancanonicalform. 130 10.5 Conjugacy versus k[x]-moduleisomorphism . 134 10.6Workedexamples. 141 11Finitely-generatedmodules . ....... 151 11.1Freemodules............... ..................... 151 11.2 Finitely-generated modules over a domain . ............ 155 11.3PIDsareUFDs................................... 158 11.4Structuretheorem,again . 159 11.5Recoveringtheearlierstructuretheorem . ............. 161 11.6Submodulesoffreemodules . 161 12PolynomialsoverUFDs . 165 12.1Gauss’lemma ................................... 165 12.2Fieldsoffractions . 167 12.3Workedexamples. 169 13Symmetricgroups . 175 13.1Cycles,disjointcycledecompositions . ............ 175 13.2Transpositions . 176 13.3Workedexamples. 176 Garrett: Abstract Algebra vii 14NaiveSetTheory ................................... 181 14.1Sets ....................................... 181 14.2Posets,ordinals . 183 14.3Transfiniteinduction . 187 14.4Finiteness,infiniteness . 188 14.5Comparisonofinfinities . 188 14.6Example: transfiniteLagrangereplacement . ............ 190 14.7EquivalentsoftheAxiomofChoice . ........ 191 15Symmetricpolynomials . 193 15.1Thetheorem.................................... 193 15.2Firstexamples . 194 15.3Avariant:discriminants. 196 16Eisenstein’scriterion . 199 16.1 Eisenstein’s irreducibility criterion . .............. 199 16.2Examples ..................................... 200 17Vandermondedeterminants . 203 17.1Vandermondedeterminants . 203 17.2Workedexamples. 206 18CyclotomicpolynomialsII. 211 18.1 Cyclotomic polynomials over Z ............................211 18.2Workedexamples. 213 19Rootsofunity..................................... 219 19.1Anotherproofofcyclicness . 219 19.2Rootsofunity ..................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LINEAR ALGEBRA METHODS in COMBINATORICS László Babai
    LINEAR ALGEBRA METHODS IN COMBINATORICS L´aszl´oBabai and P´eterFrankl Version 2.1∗ March 2020 ||||| ∗ Slight update of Version 2, 1992. ||||||||||||||||||||||| 1 c L´aszl´oBabai and P´eterFrankl. 1988, 1992, 2020. Preface Due perhaps to a recognition of the wide applicability of their elementary concepts and techniques, both combinatorics and linear algebra have gained increased representation in college mathematics curricula in recent decades. The combinatorial nature of the determinant expansion (and the related difficulty in teaching it) may hint at the plausibility of some link between the two areas. A more profound connection, the use of determinants in combinatorial enumeration goes back at least to the work of Kirchhoff in the middle of the 19th century on counting spanning trees in an electrical network. It is much less known, however, that quite apart from the theory of determinants, the elements of the theory of linear spaces has found striking applications to the theory of families of finite sets. With a mere knowledge of the concept of linear independence, unexpected connections can be made between algebra and combinatorics, thus greatly enhancing the impact of each subject on the student's perception of beauty and sense of coherence in mathematics. If these adjectives seem inflated, the reader is kindly invited to open the first chapter of the book, read the first page to the point where the first result is stated (\No more than 32 clubs can be formed in Oddtown"), and try to prove it before reading on. (The effect would, of course, be magnified if the title of this volume did not give away where to look for clues.) What we have said so far may suggest that the best place to present this material is a mathematics enhancement program for motivated high school students.
    [Show full text]
  • Schaum's Outline of Linear Algebra (4Th Edition)
    SCHAUM’S SCHAUM’S outlines outlines Linear Algebra Fourth Edition Seymour Lipschutz, Ph.D. Temple University Marc Lars Lipson, Ph.D. University of Virginia Schaum’s Outline Series New York Chicago San Francisco Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan New Delhi San Juan Seoul Singapore Sydney Toronto Copyright © 2009, 2001, 1991, 1968 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior writ- ten permission of the publisher. ISBN: 978-0-07-154353-8 MHID: 0-07-154353-8 The material in this eBook also appears in the print version of this title: ISBN: 978-0-07-154352-1, MHID: 0-07-154352-X. All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners. Rather than put a trademark symbol after every occurrence of a trademarked name, we use names in an editorial fashion only, and to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intention of infringement of the trademark. Where such designations appear in this book, they have been printed with initial caps. McGraw-Hill eBooks are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions, or for use in corporate training programs. To contact a representative please e-mail us at [email protected]. TERMS OF USE This is a copyrighted work and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“McGraw-Hill”) and its licensors reserve all rights in and to the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems in Abstract Algebra
    STUDENT MATHEMATICAL LIBRARY Volume 82 Problems in Abstract Algebra A. R. Wadsworth 10.1090/stml/082 STUDENT MATHEMATICAL LIBRARY Volume 82 Problems in Abstract Algebra A. R. Wadsworth American Mathematical Society Providence, Rhode Island Editorial Board Satyan L. Devadoss John Stillwell (Chair) Erica Flapan Serge Tabachnikov 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 00A07, 12-01, 13-01, 15-01, 20-01. For additional information and updates on this book, visit www.ams.org/bookpages/stml-82 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Wadsworth, Adrian R., 1947– Title: Problems in abstract algebra / A. R. Wadsworth. Description: Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society, [2017] | Series: Student mathematical library; volume 82 | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016057500 | ISBN 9781470435837 (alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Algebra, Abstract – Textbooks. | AMS: General – General and miscellaneous specific topics – Problem books. msc | Field theory and polyno- mials – Instructional exposition (textbooks, tutorial papers, etc.). msc | Com- mutative algebra – Instructional exposition (textbooks, tutorial papers, etc.). msc | Linear and multilinear algebra; matrix theory – Instructional exposition (textbooks, tutorial papers, etc.). msc | Group theory and generalizations – Instructional exposition (textbooks, tutorial papers, etc.). msc Classification: LCC QA162 .W33 2017 | DDC 512/.02–dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016057500 Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy select pages for use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in reviews, provided the customary acknowledgment of the source is given. Republication, systematic copying, or multiple reproduction of any material in this publication is permitted only under license from the American Mathematical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Algebra
    Abstract Algebra Martin Isaacs, University of Wisconsin-Madison (Chair) Patrick Bahls, University of North Carolina, Asheville Thomas Judson, Stephen F. Austin State University Harriet Pollatsek, Mount Holyoke College Diana White, University of Colorado Denver 1 Introduction What follows is a report summarizing the proposals of a group charged with developing recommendations for undergraduate curricula in abstract algebra.1 We begin by articulating the principles that shaped the discussions that led to these recommendations. We then indicate several learning goals; some of these address specific content areas and others address students' general development. Next, we include three sample syllabi, each tailored to meet the needs of specific types of institutions and students. Finally, we present a brief list of references including sample texts. 2 Guiding Principles We lay out here several principles that underlie our recommendations for undergraduate Abstract Algebra courses. Although these principles are very general, we indicate some of their specific implications in the discussions of learning goals and curricula below. Diversity of students We believe that a course in Abstract Algebra is valuable for a wide variety of students, including mathematics majors, mathematics education majors, mathematics minors, and majors in STEM disciplines such as physics, chemistry, and computer science. Such a course is essential preparation for secondary teaching and for many doctoral programs in mathematics. Moreover, algebra can capture the imagination of students whose attraction to mathematics is primarily to structure and abstraction (for example, 1As with any document that is produced by a committee, there were some disagreements and compromises. The committee members had many lively and spirited communications on what undergraduate Abstract Algebra should look like for the next ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • From Arithmetic to Algebra
    From arithmetic to algebra Slightly edited version of a presentation at the University of Oregon, Eugene, OR February 20, 2009 H. Wu Why can’t our students achieve introductory algebra? This presentation specifically addresses only introductory alge- bra, which refers roughly to what is called Algebra I in the usual curriculum. Its main focus is on all students’ access to the truly basic part of algebra that an average citizen needs in the high- tech age. The content of the traditional Algebra II course is on the whole more technical and is designed for future STEM students. In place of Algebra II, future non-STEM would benefit more from a mathematics-culture course devoted, for example, to an understanding of probability and data, recently solved famous problems in mathematics, and history of mathematics. At least three reasons for students’ failure: (A) Arithmetic is about computation of specific numbers. Algebra is about what is true in general for all numbers, all whole numbers, all integers, etc. Going from the specific to the general is a giant conceptual leap. Students are not prepared by our curriculum for this leap. (B) They don’t get the foundational skills needed for algebra. (C) They are taught incorrect mathematics in algebra classes. Garbage in, garbage out. These are not independent statements. They are inter-related. Consider (A) and (B): The K–3 school math curriculum is mainly exploratory, and will be ignored in this presentation for simplicity. Grades 5–7 directly prepare students for algebra. Will focus on these grades. Here, abstract mathematics appears in the form of fractions, geometry, and especially negative fractions.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Algebra
    Abstract Algebra Paul Melvin Bryn Mawr College Fall 2011 lecture notes loosely based on Dummit and Foote's text Abstract Algebra (3rd ed) Prerequisite: Linear Algebra (203) 1 Introduction Pure Mathematics Algebra Analysis Foundations (set theory/logic) G eometry & Topology What is Algebra? • Number systems N = f1; 2; 3;::: g \natural numbers" Z = f:::; −1; 0; 1; 2;::: g \integers" Q = ffractionsg \rational numbers" R = fdecimalsg = pts on the line \real numbers" p C = fa + bi j a; b 2 R; i = −1g = pts in the plane \complex nos" k polar form re iθ, where a = r cos θ; b = r sin θ a + bi b r θ a p Note N ⊂ Z ⊂ Q ⊂ R ⊂ C (all proper inclusions, e.g. 2 62 Q; exercise) There are many other important number systems inside C. 2 • Structure \binary operations" + and · associative, commutative, and distributive properties \identity elements" 0 and 1 for + and · resp. 2 solve equations, e.g. 1 ax + bx + c = 0 has two (complex) solutions i p −b ± b2 − 4ac x = 2a 2 2 2 2 x + y = z has infinitely many solutions, even in N (thei \Pythagorian triples": (3,4,5), (5,12,13), . ). n n n 3 x + y = z has no solutions x; y; z 2 N for any fixed n ≥ 3 (Fermat'si Last Theorem, proved in 1995 by Andrew Wiles; we'll give a proof for n = 3 at end of semester). • Abstract systems groups, rings, fields, vector spaces, modules, . A group is a set G with an associative binary operation ∗ which has an identity element e (x ∗ e = x = e ∗ x for all x 2 G) and inverses for each of its elements (8 x 2 G; 9 y 2 G such that x ∗ y = y ∗ x = e).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Algebra Vs. Abstract Algebra 2 Abstract Number Systems in Linear
    MATH 2135, LINEAR ALGEBRA, Winter 2017 and multiplication is also called the “logical and” operation. For example, we Handout 1: Lecture Notes on Fields can calculate like this: Peter Selinger 1 · ((1 + 0) + 1) + 1 = 1 · (1 + 1) + 1 = 1 · 0 + 1 = 0+1 1 Algebra vs. abstract algebra = 1. Operations such as addition and multiplication can be considered at several dif- 2 Abstract number systems in linear algebra ferent levels: • Arithmetic deals with specific calculation rules, such as 8 + 3 = 11. It is As you already know, Linear Algebra deals with subjects such as matrix multi- usually taught in elementary school. plication, linear combinations, solutions of systems of linear equations, and so on. It makes heavy use of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division of • Algebra deals with the idea that operations satisfy laws, such as a(b+c)= scalars (think, for example, of the rule for multiplying matrices). ab + ac. Such laws can be used, among other things, to solve equations It turns out that most of what we do in linear algebra does not rely on the spe- such as 3x + 5 = 14. cific laws of arithmetic. Linear algebra works equally well over “alternative” • Abstract algebra is the idea that we can use the laws of algebra, such as arithmetics. a(b + c) = ab + ac, while abandoning the rules of arithmetic, such as Example 2.1. Consider multiplying two matrices, using arithmetic modulo 2 8 + 3 = 11. Thus, in abstract algebra, we are able to speak of entirely instead of the usual arithmetic. different “number” systems, for example, systems in which 1+1=0.
    [Show full text]
  • Algebraic Topology - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 5
    Algebraic topology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 5 Algebraic topology From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Algebraic topology is a branch of mathematics which uses tools from abstract algebra to study topological spaces. The basic goal is to find algebraic invariants that classify topological spaces up to homeomorphism, though usually most classify up to homotopy equivalence. Although algebraic topology primarily uses algebra to study topological problems, using topology to solve algebraic problems is sometimes also possible. Algebraic topology, for example, allows for a convenient proof that any subgroup of a free group is again a free group. Contents 1 The method of algebraic invariants 2 Setting in category theory 3 Results on homology 4 Applications of algebraic topology 5 Notable algebraic topologists 6 Important theorems in algebraic topology 7 See also 8 Notes 9 References 10 Further reading The method of algebraic invariants An older name for the subject was combinatorial topology , implying an emphasis on how a space X was constructed from simpler ones (the modern standard tool for such construction is the CW-complex ). The basic method now applied in algebraic topology is to investigate spaces via algebraic invariants by mapping them, for example, to groups which have a great deal of manageable structure in a way that respects the relation of homeomorphism (or more general homotopy) of spaces. This allows one to recast statements about topological spaces into statements about groups, which are often easier to prove. Two major ways in which this can be done are through fundamental groups, or more generally homotopy theory, and through homology and cohomology groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Abstract Algebra (Math 113)
    Introduction to Abstract Algebra (Math 113) Alexander Paulin, with edits by David Corwin FOR FALL 2019 MATH 113 002 ONLY Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 What is Algebra? . 4 1.2 Sets . 6 1.3 Functions . 9 1.4 Equivalence Relations . 12 2 The Structure of + and × on Z 15 2.1 Basic Observations . 15 2.2 Factorization and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic . 17 2.3 Congruences . 20 3 Groups 23 1 3.1 Basic Definitions . 23 3.1.1 Cayley Tables for Binary Operations and Groups . 28 3.2 Subgroups, Cosets and Lagrange's Theorem . 30 3.3 Generating Sets for Groups . 35 3.4 Permutation Groups and Finite Symmetric Groups . 40 3.4.1 Active vs. Passive Notation for Permutations . 40 3.4.2 The Symmetric Group Sym3 . 43 3.4.3 Symmetric Groups in General . 44 3.5 Group Actions . 52 3.5.1 The Orbit-Stabiliser Theorem . 55 3.5.2 Centralizers and Conjugacy Classes . 59 3.5.3 Sylow's Theorem . 66 3.6 Symmetry of Sets with Extra Structure . 68 3.7 Normal Subgroups and Isomorphism Theorems . 73 3.8 Direct Products and Direct Sums . 83 3.9 Finitely Generated Abelian Groups . 85 3.10 Finite Abelian Groups . 90 3.11 The Classification of Finite Groups (Proofs Omitted) . 95 4 Rings, Ideals, and Homomorphisms 100 2 4.1 Basic Definitions . 100 4.2 Ideals, Quotient Rings and the First Isomorphism Theorem for Rings . 105 4.3 Properties of Elements of Rings . 109 4.4 Polynomial Rings . 112 4.5 Ring Extensions . 115 4.6 Field of Fractions .
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing Your Math Course
    CHOOSING YOUR MATH COURSE When choosing your first math class, it’s important to consider your current skills, the topics covered, and course expectations. It’s also helpful to think about how each course aligns with both your interests and your career and transfer goals. If you have questions, talk with your advisor. The courses on page 1 are developmental-level and the courses on page 2 are college-level. • Developmental math courses (Foundations of Math and Math & Algebra for College) offer the chance to develop concepts and skills you may have forgotten or never had the chance to learn. They focus less on lecture and more on practicing concepts individually and in groups. Your homework will emphasize developing and practicing new skills. • College-level math courses build on foundational skills taught in developmental math courses. Homework, quizzes, and exams will often include word problems that require multiple steps and incorporate a variety of math skills. You should expect three to four exams per semester, which cover a variety of concepts, and shorter weekly quizzes which focus on one or two concepts. You may be asked to complete a final project and submit a paper using course concepts, research, and writing skills. Course Your Skills Readiness Topics Covered & Course Expectations Foundations of 1. All multiplication facts (through tens, preferably twelves) should be memorized. In Foundations of Mathematics, you will: Mathematics • learn to use frections, decimals, percentages, whole numbers, & 2. Whole number addition, subtraction, multiplication, division (without a calculator): integers to solve problems • interpret information that is communicated in a graph, chart & table Math & Algebra 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Strategies for Improving Algebra Knowledge in Middle and High School Students
    EDUCATOR’S PRACTICE GUIDE A set of recommendations to address challenges in classrooms and schools WHAT WORKS CLEARINGHOUSE™ Teaching Strategies for Improving Algebra Knowledge in Middle and High School Students NCEE 2015-4010 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION About this practice guide The Institute of Education Sciences (IES) publishes practice guides in education to provide edu- cators with the best available evidence and expertise on current challenges in education. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) develops practice guides in conjunction with an expert panel, combining the panel’s expertise with the findings of existing rigorous research to produce spe- cific recommendations for addressing these challenges. The WWC and the panel rate the strength of the research evidence supporting each of their recommendations. See Appendix A for a full description of practice guides. The goal of this practice guide is to offer educators specific, evidence-based recommendations that address the challenges of teaching algebra to students in grades 6 through 12. This guide synthesizes the best available research and shares practices that are supported by evidence. It is intended to be practical and easy for teachers to use. The guide includes many examples in each recommendation to demonstrate the concepts discussed. Practice guides published by IES are available on the What Works Clearinghouse website at http://whatworks.ed.gov. How to use this guide This guide provides educators with instructional recommendations that can be implemented in conjunction with existing standards or curricula and does not recommend a particular curriculum. Teachers can use the guide when planning instruction to prepare students for future mathemat- ics and post-secondary success.
    [Show full text]
  • Taming the Unknown. a History of Algebra from Antiquity to the Early Twentieth Century, by Victor J
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 52, Number 4, October 2015, Pages 725–731 S 0273-0979(2015)01491-6 Article electronically published on March 23, 2015 Taming the unknown. A history of algebra from antiquity to the early twentieth century, by Victor J. Katz and Karen Hunger Parshall, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2014, xvi+485 pp., ISBN 978-0-691-14905-9, US $49.50 1. Algebra now Algebra has been a part of mathematics since ancient times, but only in the 20th century did it come to play a crucial role in other areas of mathematics. Algebraic number theory, algebraic geometry, and algebraic topology now cast a big shadow on their parent disciplines of number theory, geometry, and topology. And algebraic topology gave birth to category theory, the algebraic view of mathematics that is now a dominant way of thinking in almost all areas. Even analysis, in some ways the antithesis of algebra, has been affected. As long ago as 1882, algebra captured some important territory from analysis when Dedekind and Weber absorbed the Abel and Riemann–Roch theorems into their theory of algebraic function fields, now part of the foundations of algebraic geometry. Not all mathematicians are happy with these developments. In a speech in 2000, entitled Mathematics in the 20th Century, Michael Atiyah said: Algebra is the offer made by the devil to the mathematician. The devil says “I will give you this powerful machine, and it will answer any question you like. All you need to do is give me your soul; give up geometry and you will have this marvellous machine.” Atiyah (2001), p.
    [Show full text]