(Reader) / Senior Assistant Professor (University Lecturer / Senior Lecturer) in Operations and Technology Management at Cambridge Judge Business School

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

(Reader) / Senior Assistant Professor (University Lecturer / Senior Lecturer) in Operations and Technology Management at Cambridge Judge Business School

Associate Professor (Reader) / Senior Assistant Professor (University Lecturer / Senior Lecturer) in Operations and Technology Management at Cambridge Judge Business School The Operations and Technology Management (OTM) group of Cambridge Judge Business School (CJBS) will be seeking to fill a position at the rank of Associate Professor (Reader) or Senior Assistant Professor (University Lecturer / Senior Lecturer), subject to final approval of the post by the University Committee. Cambridge Judge Business School is a highly ranked business school, located at the heart of an 800- year old University and within one of the most active entrepreneurship clusters in Europe. The OTM group at CJBS is collegial and ambitious, and has developed a reputation for management research that is rigorous, original and consequential, as evidenced by a strong publication record, high profile media coverage, and the strength of its PhD program. The group seeks to further increase its global visibility through research outputs, including publications in top management journals, as well as by placing its PhD graduates in academic positions in leading schools. The ideal candidates will have a record of impactful research, as evidenced by publications in top journals and a strong paper pipeline. They will also have excellent teaching experience on premium business school degree programs (MBA; Executive MBA) and preferably on Executive Education engagements. The OTM group at CJBS is very supportive of research with real-world impact and is particularly welcoming of candidates unafraid to tackle ‘grand challenge’ topics in organizations and society more widely. The members of the group are actively pursuing research topics that inform their executive teaching and, in turn, choose research priorities motivated by problems identified through executive teaching. Depending on the experience of the successful candidate and subject to final approval of the position by the University Committee, the appointment will be made at the Reader, University Lecturer or University Senior Lecturer level, and is anticipated to start on 1 September 2018 or as soon as possible thereafter. We offer a competitive package of benefits and salary. This vacancy will soon be advertised on the University of Cambridge job opportunities website: http://www.jobs.cam.ac.uk/job/ In the meantime expressions of interest can be discussed further with the OTM group head (Professor Stelios Kavadias) at [email protected]. Professor Kavadias will attend the INFORMS conference where he will be available for informal meetings regarding the position. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Graduate Policies Procedures
GRADUATE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Graduate Division 5/18/2021 Table of Contents Contact Us ........................................................................................................................................... 3 I. ADMINISTRATION .......................................................................................................................... 4 A. The Role of the Graduate Division ................................................................................................ 4 B. The Role of Graduate Council ....................................................................................................... 4 C. The Role of the Faculty Graduate Advisor .................................................................................... 5 II. ADMISSIONS .................................................................................................................................. 5 A. Admissions Policy .......................................................................................................................... 5 B. The Application Process ................................................................................................................. 9 C. Admission Decisions .................................................................................................................... 15 D. Readmission ................................................................................................................................. 17 III. FELLOWSHIPS AND GRANTS ....................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Research Topic
CURRICULUM VITAE November 2010 Claudia SENIK Born on May 28th, 1964 in Paris, French Nationality, 6, rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75006 Paris. ACTUAL POSITION Full Professor, University Paris IV Sorbonne Professor at the Paris School of Economics Research Fellow at IZA (Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn) Member of the Institut Universitaire de France PSE, 48, bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France tel. 33 1 43 13 63 12 (office) / 33 6 16 55 75 15 (mobile) e-mail : [email protected] http://www.pse.ens.fr/senik/index.html Main Research Topic Income Distribution and Subjective Well-Being: a Micro-Econometric Approach. Democracy, Market Liberalization and Political Preferences. ClaudiaSenik Curriculum vitae Former positions 1996-2000 Full Professor at the University Lille-I 1994-1996 Assistant Professor (Maître de conférences) at the University Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines. 1993-1994 Post-Doctorate at ECARE (ULB, Free University of Brussels). 1993-1995 Assistant Professor (A.T.E.R.) at the University Paris-IX Dauphine. EDUCATION AND GRADES 1996 Agregation in Economic Science (national competition for Full Professor tenure). 1995 Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches (entitlement to research direction) University Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines. 1990-1993 PhD at DELTA, E.H.E.S.S Subject : “Openness and Competitiveness in the Republics of the Former USSR ”, under the direction of Richard Portes. 1988 - 1989 Institute of Economics of the Moscow University. 1987 - 1988 D.E.A. (Master) in International Economics, University Paris- I. First thesis : “The Price Reform in USSR”, under the direction of Ms Lavigne. Second thesis: “Hyperinflation and Stabilization, the Case of Israel”, under the direction of M.
[Show full text]
Glossary of Academic Personnel Terms (Revised September 2014)
Glossary of Academic Personnel Terms (revised September 2014) Above-Scale An academic appointee who advances beyond the highest step on the salary scale in a series is considered above scale. For example, in the Professor (ladder-rank) series, the highest step on the salary scale is Step IX, so the next advancement would be to Professor, Above Scale. The honorary, unofficial title of Distinguished Professor (see below) is conferred upon those who achieve the rank of Professor, Above Scale. Academic Appointee A university employee who is engaged primarily in research and creative work, teaching, and/or public service, and whose duties are closely related to the University's instructional and research functions. Academic appointees include, but are not limited to, academic administrative officers, faculty, research appointees, student appointees, medical residents, University Extension appointees, and librarians. Academic Administrative Officer An academic appointee holding an administrative position. Academic Administrative Officers include, but are not limited to, Associate Deans, Divisional Deans, or Directors of Organized Research Units. Faculty members holding certain administrative titles such as Chancellor and Vice Chancellor are also academic administrative officers but are part of the Senior Management Group. Academic Personnel On-Line (AP On-Line) Academic Personnel On-Line is a UCSD business system for completing academic personnel actions electronically. The system is a suite of services that currently includes e-Recruitment, Recruit, and Review. Planned additional services include AP On-Line Appointments and AP On-Line Leaves. Academic Personnel Manual (APM) The Academic Personnel Manual sets forth the policies and procedures pertaining to the employment relationship between an academic appointee and the University of California.
[Show full text]
WVPU Academic Guidelines for Appointment, Extension And
Academic Guidelines for Appointment, Extension and Promotion Adopted by the Executive Board and approved by the University Council on October 7, 2016 Introduction The Guidelines particularize the provisions stipulated in the Constitution of Webster Vienna Private University (WVPU). The university has different appointment, extension and promotion policies for its scientific staff based on three categories: employed faculty, adjunct faculty, and other scientific staff. 1 Categories of Scientific Staff The university distinguishes its scientific staff in three categories: employed faculty, adjunct faculty, and other scientific staff. The university may also employ visiting professors. 1.1 Employed Faculty Employed faculty include those individuals who have gone through the constitutionally appropriate appointment procedures and whose primary tasks are in the areas of research and teaching whereby any additional administrative or mentoring tasks are considered either part of their service records (i.e. not additionally compensated) or explicitly compensated for specific managerial tasks (i.e. department head stipends). Employed faculty assignments include research, teaching, and service whereby they are all required to do independent research, collaborate in scholarly/scientific projects, do independent teaching, supervise undergraduate and graduate theses, participate in committees, serve on task forces, and cooperate in administrative responsibilities. The university distinguishes and assesses its employed faculty in accordance with their rank, which includes Assistant, Associate and Full Professors. This system aims to foster mentorship and advancement among faculty. All three ranks require at least a doctorate degree. Depending on the discipline, the equivalent in professional experience may serve as a substitute for doctoral degrees. Assistant, Associate and Full Professors are appointed under the conditions of the Austrian labor law.
[Show full text]
The Rise of Female-Centric Habilitation and the New Politics of Imprisonment
Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality Volume 2 Issue 2 Article 4 Spring 2014 No Fleeting Phenomenon: The Rise of Female-Centric Habilitation and the New Politics of Imprisonment Priya N. Purohit [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijlse Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Purohit, Priya N. (2014) "No Fleeting Phenomenon: The Rise of Female-Centric Habilitation and the New Politics of Imprisonment," Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality: Vol. 2 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijlse/vol2/iss2/4 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality Volume 2: Issue 2 No Fleeting Phenomenon: The Rise of Female-Centric Habilitation and the New Politics of Imprisonment Review by Priya N. Purohit* BREAKING WOMEN: GENDER, RACE, AND THE NEW POLITICS OF IMPRISONMENT. By Jill McCorkel. New York City, N.Y.: NYU Press. 2013. INTRODUCTION Breaking Women: Gender, Race, and the New Politics of Imprisonment, by Jill A. McCorkel, associate professor of sociology and criminology at Villanova University, examines the role of habilitation—a set of confrontational social tech- nologies that induce the forcible “breakdown” of the “diseased” self of the addict— in the new penology that took shape during the “War on Drugs” in the mid-1990s.1 McCorkel argues habilitation is both gendered and racialized, and has contributed heavily to the contemporary American penal system’s function as a racial caste system.
[Show full text]
How to Become a Medical Professor – a Comparative Analysis of Academic
Innov Surg Sci 2019; 4(3): 108–115 Original Article Seyed Arash Alawi*, Rosalia Luketina, Nicco Krezdorn, Lukas Fabian Busch, Anne Limbourg, Ludwik Branski, Peter M. Vogt and Andreas Jokuszies How to become a medical professor – a comparative analysis of academic requirements in Germany and the United States https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2019-0011 Due to different scientific cooperation and exchange pro- Received June 11, 2019; accepted August 6, 2019; previously grams, research and academic activities have reached an published online August 22, 2019 intense international exchange level. Yet there is no inter- Abstract national or even national standardization, quality assur- ance, and comparability to gain a medical professorship. Background: The acquisition of a medical professorship Keywords: academic career; academic system; professor- represents a significant step in a physician’s academic ship; research and teaching. career. The responsibility as well as the honor and the asso- ciated obligations are significant; however, the require- ments to become a medical professor vary in Germany. Objective: We analyzed the variable requirements for Introduction prospective medical professors in Germany, with special focus on the tenure track concept and the U.S. system. German academic system Methods: Based on an online research, we queried German medical faculty regulations to obtain a medical If you aspire to become a medical professor in Germany, professorship within Germany. the stairway is steep; however, there are different ways of Results: We analyzed 35 German universities. On average, climbing up the academic career ladder. As soon as you 11 publications are required after “venia legendi” to meet reach “venia legendi”, specific faculty requirements are set professorship (apl) prerequisites (median x̅ = 10, max = 24, to obtain professorship.
[Show full text]
The Faculty of Law's Guidelines for Appointment and Promotion Of
JURFAK 2015/49 The Faculty of Law’s Guidelines for Appointment and Promotion of Teachers Adopted by the Board of the Faculty of Law on 11 June 2015 Revised on 21 May 2018 (Appendix 2) and on 22 September 2020 Contents 1. General ________________________________________________________________ 2 2 Recruitment as professor ________________________________________________ 4 3 Promotion to professor __________________________________________________ 6 4 Recruitment as senior lecturer ____________________________________________ 7 5 Promotion from associate senior lecturer to senior lecturer ____________________ 8 6 Promotion from lecturer to senior lecturer __________________________________ 9 7 Recruitment as associate senior lecturer or assistant professor _______________ 10 8 Recruitment as lecturer _________________________________________________ 11 9 Instructions for experts _________________________________________________ 11 10 Instructions for drawing up a teaching-post application ______________________ 12 Research qualifications ___________________________________________________ 12 Teaching qualifications ___________________________________________________ 13 Introduction _______________________________________________________ 13 Teaching contributions ______________________________________________ 13 Teacher training ___________________________________________________ 14 Teaching development work and research on education ____________________ 14 Teaching materials _________________________________________________ 14 Other contributions
[Show full text]
The UK Academic System: Hierarchy, Students, Grants, Fellowships and All That
The UK Academic System: hierarchy, students, grants, fellowships and all that Geoffrey J. Barton School of Life Sciences University of Dundee Dundee Scotland, UK www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk www.jalview.org twitter: @gjbarton [email protected] Version 4.2 – July 2019 Copyright © G. J. Barton, 2008, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019 1 Table of Contents Prefaces ..................................................................................................................... 3 Version 4.2 – July 2019 ..................................................................................................... 3 Version 4.0 – July 2018 ..................................................................................................... 3 Version 3.0 – March 2014 ................................................................................................. 4 Version 2.0 – April 2012 ................................................................................................... 4 Version 1.0 – March 2008 ................................................................................................. 4 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 5 The Excitement of a Scientific Career ............................................................................... 5 An academic scientist’s research environment ................................................................ 5 What is School, University and all that? ..........................................................................
[Show full text]
Faculty Review and Compensation at the University of California
Faculty Review and Compensation at the University of California The unique compensation system by which faculty are reviewed, advanced, and paid at UC has played a large part in building the excellence of UC. Although UC faculty have standard ranks of assistant, associate, and full professor, the system also has a set of steps within these ranks, with each rank and step carrying a specific salary. The peer review process and attendant salary scale system was designed to create consistency and equity across campuses and disciplines, but market forces— including increasing differences by discipline and campus—present challenges for administrators and faculty. The UC President, the Provost and Executive Vice President, and OP Academic Personnel (AP) play key roles in administering systemwide salary decisions, and the Academic Personnel Manual (APM) contains the policies that govern campus review processes and standards as well as compensation practices. All review of individual faculty members takes place on the campuses, however, and each campus has additional guidelines to operationalize APM policies. UC’s integrated system of regular peer review and attendant salary scales The system of regular peer review and attendant salary increments for strong performance by UC faculty is premised on assumptions that peer review encourages strong performance and that productivity should be encouraged over an entire career. Criteria and processes of review vary by title series, but the policy for ladder-rank faculty sets a pattern for all other faculty groups. Unique elements of the system for the ladder-rank faculty follow: 1. Integration of the faculty salary scale system with specific levels of scholarly achievement determined through peer review.
[Show full text]
Procedures Governing the Promotion of a Teaching Assistant Professor To
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS & ASTRONOMY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL Procedures Governing the Promotion of a Teaching Assistant Professor to Teaching Associate Professor December 2010 - Approved by Dean's Office with endorsement of College Committee on Promotion of Senior Lecturer; Revised 2014. Revised December 13, 2017 by Department Chair Christian Iliadis, and approved by Senior Associate Dean for Fixed Term Faculty, Terry Rhodes on Feb. 19, 2018. A. Eligibility for Promotion to Teaching Associate Professor A Teaching Assistant Professor is eligible for recommenDation for promotion to Teaching Associate Professor on the following bases: 1. The canDiDate must have a minimum of six consecutive years’ full-time (i.e., 1 FTE) service as a Teaching Assistant Professor in the same College Department, or, if the canDiDate is from another institution, six consecutive years of full-time (1 FTE) service as a Teaching Assistant Professor or faculty equivalent. 2. The canDiDate must proviDe Demonstrable eviDence of extraorDinary teaching anD service to the appointing Department, BeyonD that which is expected of a Teaching Assistant Professor, in accorDance with stanDarDs of extraorDinary teaching anD service Defined by the unit in which the canDiDate is appointeD. In the Department of Physics & Astronomy, eviDence of extraorDinary teaching may incluDe: a university teaching award, consistent teaching evaluations in the top 10% of the department, regular service on undergraduate honors theses committees, exceptionally high peer teaching
[Show full text]
Santa Cruz Campus 2002-03
ACADEMIC SALARY SCALES SANTA CRUZ CAMPUS 2002-03 Table of Contents TITLE OR SCALE Page Table of Contents 1-2 Alphabetical Index of Scales 3-4 NOTES -- Professor Series 5-6 NOTES -- Librarian Series 7 NOTES -- Supervisor of Physical Education Series 7 Off-Scale Salary Limits - Professor Series 8 Off-Scale Salary Limits - Professor Series B & E Scales 9 Faculty - Ladder Ranks -- Professor Series Academic Year 10 Fiscal Year 11 Faculty - Ladder Ranks -- Specialized Salary Scales Business Administration/Management and Engineering Academic Year 12 Fiscal Year 13 Faculty - Acting Ranks -- Professor Series Academic and Fiscal Year 14 Faculty - Acting Ranks -- Specialized Salary Scales Business Administration/Management and Engineering Academic and Fiscal Year 15 Faculty - Recall Teaching Stipends 16 Supervisor of Physical Education Series 17 Lecturers and Senior Lecturers with Security of Employment Lecturers and Senior Lecturers with Potential Security of Employment Academic and Fiscal Year 18 SOE Table of Pay Rates 19-20 Other Lecturer Titles - Unit 18 Academic and Fiscal Year 21 Unit 18 Lecturer Table of Pay Rates 22-23 Supervisor of Teacher Education 24-25 Faculty Research Series Academic Year 26 Academic Year (1/9th monthly) 27 1 TITLE OR SCALE Page Professional Research Fiscal Year (11 months) 28 Professional Research Fiscal Year (11 months) Business/Management/Engineering 28a Student Titles & Non-Student Titles Reader 29 Teaching Assistant 29 Teaching Fellow 29 Tutor 29 Graduate Student Researcher 30 Associate In ____ 31 Remedial Tutor
[Show full text]
Faculty Titles and Ranks I
The University of Mississippi Faculty Titles and Ranks I. Hiring Authority The Mississippi Board of Trustees of the Institutions of Higher Learning (IHL) empowers the IHL Commissioner and the Chancellor of the University of Mississippi to make all appointments and promotions of faculty and staff, with the exceptions indicated in section 401 of the IHL Policies and Bylaws. II. Overview of Faculty Categories Actively employed faculty members at the University of Mississippi have primary appointments in one of the following categories: Regular, Support, and Research Faculty. These categories reflect the principal duties of the faculty members. Those faculty members in the Support and Research Faculty categories have a prefix associated with their title and are not eligible for tenure. Additionally, the University recognizes Emeritus Faculty. A large subset of the faculty is also referred to as the professorial faculty or professorial ranks. This is defined below as faculty members, in any of the above categories, who hold a rank of assistant, associate, or (full) professor. III. Contracts and Terms of Employment A faculty member (whether Regular Faculty, Support Faculty, or Research Faculty) who receives and signs a contract with the Board of Trustees of Institutions of Higher Learning is considered a contractual employee. Faculty contracts will state the term of the appointment and the title. The length of the contract is dependent upon the position held and may be changed as that position changes, as a person changes positions, and/or at the discretion of the University. Most faculty members are employed on 9- month contracts, though some faculty, including those who hold department chair and other administrative positions, may be hired on 12-month contracts.
[Show full text]