DOCSLIB.ORG

An Experimental Approach to Understanding Aurignacian Projectile Technology in NW Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Experimental Approach to Understanding Aurignacian Projectile Technology in NW Europe University of Southampton Research Repository Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis and, where applicable, any accompanying data are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non- commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis and the accompanying data cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content of the thesis and accompanying research data (where applicable) must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder/s. When referring to this thesis and any accompanying data, full bibliographic details must be given, e.g. Thesis: Author (Year of Submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University Faculty or School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. Data: Author (Year) Title. URI [dataset] University of Southampton Faculty of Humanities An experimental approach to understanding Aurignacian projectile technology in NW Europe By James Robert Dilley Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2021 1 University of Southampton Abstract Faculty of Humanities Archaeology Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy An experimental approach to understanding Aurignacian projectile technology in NW Europe James Dilley Understanding the challenges and trials faced by early Upper Palaeolithic people in north-west Europe has been an avenue of investigation since the earliest archaeological research of this time period. In the decades since, huge amounts of time and effort have been invested in studying the lithic and osseous tools found in caves, rock shelters and rare open-air sites. However, this time and effort has almost exclusively been focussed on understanding the objects that have stood the test of time, with little consideration of the components that may have once been attached to these surviving objects. The components that no longer survive are at least as important as the surviving parts. They can offer different insights into the challenges faced by the first modern humans in Europe which can give indications of the likely hunting or movement strategies of these early groups. Limited experimental study has shown that the osseous points of the Aurignacian (c. 44-31 ka cal BP) are almost certainly spear points and that they were effective at causing wounds to Pleistocene herbivores. However, like much past literature, the focus has been on the spear tips rather than the whole of the spear. This thesis changes tack from previous research in that it gives the limelight to the other components and materials that would have made an Aurignacian spear. It also investigates the possible reasoning for the manufacture and form of the spear tips, but with a view on the relationship with the other parts. Key questions will look at the role other Aurignacian tools played in the production of spears and if glues or mastics were required. Whether the spear tips were over-engineered or whether they were carefully designed to improve the longevity of more valuable components (such as the spear shaft). If resource management can be identified based on simulated plant biomes of Europe during Marine Oxygen Isotope Stage 3 and organic samples from around Europe, and what it tells us about sources of viable spear shafts. How these spears may have performed is tested using semi-controlled throwing experiments at a sports field, and in a drop tower, with a focus on all the components of the spear. Finally, what the experimental, biome, organic sample and archaeological evidence are used to evaluate the hunting strategies of Aurignacian groups in NW Europe. 2 Contents 3 List of figures 5 List of tables 8 Declaration of authorship 9 Acknowledgements 10 Definitions and abbreviations 11 Chapter 1: Introduction & research strategy 13 Introduction 13 Research aims 19 Research questions 21 Hypotheses for testing 22 Research constraints 23 Thesis Outline 25 Summary 27 Chapter 2: Setting the (hunting) scene 28 Contextualising the Aurignacian in NW Europe 28 Missing the mark in past literature 39 A haft for a spear 52 A view to a kill 54 Summary 73 Chapter 3: The Aurignacian World 75 Primary prey 88 Chapter 4: Making the point 96 Production of replica osseous points 98 3 Glues and bindings 98 Testing the replica Aurignacian spears 99 Production of stone tools 103 Production of antler split base points 104 Chapter 5: Spear testing 118 Spear throwing experiment 118 Discussion 124 Drop tower experiments 126 Discussion 137 Chapter 6: Collection of wood samples 140 Collection of wood samples 140 Discussion 148 Chapter 7: Conclusion 150 Conclusion 150 Chapter 8: Implications for the study of spear technology in prehistory 157 Implications for the study of spear technology in prehistory 157 Appendices 161 References 162 4 List of figures Figure 1: Aurignacian osseous points all from the Dordogne except f (SW Germany) 18 Figure 2: Sites represented are Butesti (Spain) and Budzujeni (Moldovia) (a-c), Promlom II (Crimea) (d-f), Grotte de l’Hermitage (France) (g-i), Grotta del Broion (Italy) (j), Combe Grenal (France) (k), Combe Grenal (France), layer 16, (l)–(n) Camiac (France), (o)–(q) Salzgitter-Lebenstedt (Germany) and Grotte Vaufrey (France), layer VIII (r) 29 Figure 3: Ivory points from Torralba and Ambrona (Spain) showing a consistent style that appears to be created by a cut through most of the ivory before the blank is split off creating a tail. 29 Figure 4: Map of Europe showing some of the main Aurignacian sites that yielded split base points. 31 Figure 5: Location of split based points and tongued pieces in Europe 31 Figure 6: Aurignacian point from Uphill Quarry (1), Probable bevelled tool from Hyaena Den (2) and modified antler from Pin Hole, Creswell Crags (3). 34 Figure 7: British Aurignacian site: 1. Longhole; 2. Kent’s Cavern; 3. Ffynnon Beuno; 4. Hoyle’s Mouth; 5. Uphill Quarry; 6. Hyena Den; 7. Aston Mills; 8. Pin Hole; 9. Paviland Cave 35 Figure 8: A “typical Ahmarian assemblage” alongside a “typical Levantine Aurignacian assemblage” 36 Figure 9 Bone points from Ksar Akil, Lebanon 37 Figure 10: Production of SBPs as theorised by Peyrony (1) and Henri-Martin (2). An example of a tongued piece, or pièces à languette, is shown in the bottom left 41 Figure 11: Hierarchal structure of antler showing collagen fibres or ‘grain’ as discussed by Tejero (2016) in regards to splitting antler for blanks 43 Figure 12: Production method used by Tartar and White (2013) to produce many blanks from one beam (2). However the risk of misshapen blanks due to a failed split is relatively high 44 Figure 13: Tartar and White (2013) used both Henri-Martin’s (1931) method by cleavage (left) and Peyrony’s (1933) method by flexion (right). 45 Figure 14: After successfully creating the initial split by flexion, Tartar and White (2013) demonstrate the use of cleavage to lengthen the split 45 Figure 15: Tejero’s (2016) method demonstrated using examples from El Castillo, Conde Cave and Labeko Koba. Cross-segmentation the red deer antler (1) 46 Figure 16: Reconstructed designs of the Les Prés de Laure composite point 49 Figure 17: Direction of repeated lithic transport between core areas 55 5 Figure 18: Socio-spatial organisation and group mobility during the Aurignacian with population estimates 55 Figure 19: Some of the bone points from Potočka zijalka showing a variety of incisions across the faces and sides 59 Figure 20: Split base points from Abri Castanet (above) and La Ferrassie (below) side-by-side 65 Figure 21: Simple base and split base points from La Ferrassie (two left and two top right), showing a range of sizes 65 Figure 22a: Narrow simple-based points from La Ferrassie 66 Figure 22b: (right) – 3 Simple-based points of different sizes and broken sections (top) are also from La Ferrassie. 66 Figure 23: (left): Damaged SBP from La Ferrassie, (middle): Damaged SBP from Abri Castanet, (right): Damaged SBP from La Ferrassie. 66 Figure 24: Highly polished split base point from Abri Pataud 67 Figure 25: Tongued piece (left), or pièce à languette, and broken split base point (right) from Abri Pataud. 67 Figure 26: Knecht’s (1993) chaîne opératoire of producing shims (dark grey rectangles) and their possible hafting method. 68 Figure 27: Osseous and lithic points that have both pierced cattle thoracic vertebrae. 70 Figure 28: An osseous and a lithic point that have both been damaged in use (Musée National de Préhistoire). 70 Figure 29: Experimental points showing different impact damage. 71 Figure 30: Cellier point A 73 Figure 31: Cellier point B 73 Figure 32: Cellier point C 73 Figure 33: From Huntley et al. (2013) pg. 5: Tree, shrub and herb plant functional type ANPP: Heinrich Event 4 housing experiment compared to 38 ka BP normal experiment. 78 Figure 34: A cross-section of topography through Alaskan landforms 79 Figure 35: Inferred and simulated biomes based on pollen data 80 Figure 36: Charcoal samples of species considered viable options for spear shaft production have been identified via coloured dots (each colour representing a different species). 81 Figure 37: Map generated using following sites (by country) 84 6 Figure 38: (1–2) spear tips from Hohle Fels IV, (3) split-based point from Hohle Fels Vb; Vogelherd V: (11) massived-base point, possibly unfinished; Vogelherd V: (4, 5, 9, 10) split-based points, (6) massive-based point; Vogelherd IV: (7–8) massived-base points. 85 Figure 39: Map generated using following sites: El Castillo, El Cuco, Labeko, Arbreda, Isturitz, Gatzarria, Mauran, Battuts, Brassempouy, Roc-de-Combe, Ferrassie, Castanet, Abri Pataud, Bourgeois Delaunay, La Quina and Fontaury/Hauteroche 92 Figure 40: Throwing of replica Aurignacian spears at a sports field.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Palaeolithic Bone Retouchers from Belgium: a Preliminary­ Overview of the Recent Research Through Historic and Recently Excavated Bone Collections
    GRÉGORY ABRAMS PALAEOLITHIC BONE RETOUCHERS FROM BELGIUM: A PRE LIMINARY OVERVIEW OF THE RECENT RESEARCH THROUGH HISTORIC AND RECENTLY EXCAVATED BONE COLLECTIONS Abstract Since the first half of the 19th century, Belgium has provided a multitude of sites dating back to the Palaeo- lithic. These discoveries have contributed to the definition of the Palaeolithic and to the understanding of prehistoric people. This long tradition of research has resulted in the collection of thousands of bones that are increasingly the subject of extensive analysis, including the study of bone retouchers. At present, this re- search has identified 535 retouchers in various Belgian repositories. The tools come from different sites with highly variable and incomplete contextual information depending on their excavation history (e.g., Trou du Diable and the Caves of Goyet). In contrast, unit 5 of Scladina Cave constitutes a well-defined assemblage. Bones with fresh fracture patterns provide interesting technological data, such as a refitted cave bear femo- ral shaft that includes four retouchers. The use of cave bear bones for producing tools at Scladina Cave as well as retouchers made from Neanderthal remains from the 3rd Cave of Goyet gives rise to questions about the possible symbolic meanings attributed to particular species. Keywords Belgium; Middle Palaeolithic; Retouchers; Neanderthals; Cave bear; Refitting Introduction Belgian Palaeolithic research has its roots deep in ness of cave sites was such that most were explored the first half of the 19th century with the work of during the 19th century. Philippe-Charles Schmerling, who found the first Since the beginning of research into Belgian Neander thal remains in Engis Cave in the early prehistory, archaeologists have focused their atten- 1830s.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER October 2015
    NEWSLETTER October 2015 Dates for your diary MAD evenings Tuesdays 7.30 - 9.30 pm at Strathpeffer Community Centre 17th November Northern Picts - Candy Hatherley of Aberdeen University 8th December A pot pourri of NOSAS activity 19th January 2016 Rock Art – Phase 2 John Wombell 16th February 15th March Bobbin Mills - Joanna Gilliat Winter walks Thursday 5th November Pictish Easter Ross with soup and sandwiches in Balintore - David Findlay Friday 4th December Slochd to Sluggan Bridge: military roads and other sites with afternoon tea - Meryl Marshall Saturday 9th January 2016 Roland Spencer-Jones Thursday 4th February Caledonian canal and Craig Phadrig Fort- Bob & Rosemary Jones Saturday 5th March Sat 9th April Brochs around Brora - Anne Coombs Training Sunday 8 November 2 - 4 pm at Tarradale House Pottery identification course (beginners repeated) - Eric Grant 1 Archaeology Scotland Summer School, May 2015 The Archaeology Scotland Summer School for 2015 covered Kilmartin and North Knapdale. The group stayed in Inveraray and included a number of NOSAS members who enjoyed the usual well researched sites and excellent evening talks. The first site was a Neolithic chambered cairn in Crarae Gardens. This cairn was excavated in the 1950s when it was discovered to contain inhumations and cremation burials. The chamber is divided into three sections by two septal slabs with the largest section at the rear. The next site was Arichonan township which overlooks Caol Scotnish, an inlet of Loch Sween, and which was cleared in 1848 though there were still some households listed in the 1851 census. Chambered cairn Marion Ruscoe Later maps indicate some roofed buildings as late as 1898.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Years on Ice Age Europe Network Celebrates – Page 5
    network of heritage sites Magazine Issue 2 aPriL 2018 neanderthal rock art Latest research from spanish caves – page 6 Underground theatre British cave balances performances with conservation – page 16 Caves with ice age art get UnesCo Label germany’s swabian Jura awarded world heritage status – page 40 5 Years On ice age europe network celebrates – page 5 tewww.ice-age-europe.euLLING the STORY of iCe AGE PeoPLe in eUROPe anD eXPL ORING PLEISTOCene CULtURAL HERITAGE IntrOductIOn network of heritage sites welcome to the second edition of the ice age europe magazine! Ice Age europe Magazine – issue 2/2018 issn 2568­4353 after the successful launch last year we are happy to present editorial board the new issue, which is again brimming with exciting contri­ katrin hieke, gerd­Christian weniger, nick Powe butions. the magazine showcases the many activities taking Publication editing place in research and conservation, exhibition, education and katrin hieke communication at each of the ice age europe member sites. Layout and design Brightsea Creative, exeter, Uk; in addition, we are pleased to present two special guest Beate tebartz grafik Design, Düsseldorf, germany contributions: the first by Paul Pettitt, University of Durham, cover photo gives a brief overview of a groundbreaking discovery, which fashionable little sapiens © fumane Cave proved in february 2018 that the neanderthals were the first Inside front cover photo cave artists before modern humans. the second by nuria sanz, water bird – hohle fels © urmu, director of UnesCo in Mexico and general coor­­­di nator of the Photo: burkert ideenreich heaDs programme, reports on the new initiative for a serial transnational nomination of neanderthal sites as world heritage, for which this network laid the foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbolic Use of Marine Shells and Mineral Pigments by Iberian Neandertals
    Symbolic use of marine shells and mineral pigments by Iberian Neandertals João Zilhãoa,1, Diego E. Angeluccib, Ernestina Badal-Garcíac, Francesco d’Erricod,e, Floréal Danielf, Laure Dayetf, Katerina Doukag, Thomas F. G. Highamg, María José Martínez-Sánchezh, Ricardo Montes-Bernárdezi, Sonia Murcia-Mascarósj, Carmen Pérez-Sirventh, Clodoaldo Roldán-Garcíaj, Marian Vanhaerenk, Valentín Villaverdec, Rachel Woodg, and Josefina Zapatal aUniversity of Bristol, Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, Bristol BS8 1UU, United Kingdom; bUniversità degli Studi di Trento, Laboratorio di Preistoria B. Bagolini, Dipartimento di Filosofia, Storia e Beni Culturali, 38122 Trento, Italy; cUniversidad de Valencia, Departamento de Prehistoria y Arqueología, 46010 Valencia, Spain; dCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5199, De la Préhistoire à l’Actuel: Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie, 33405 Talence, France; eUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Institute for Human Evolution, Johannesburg, 2050 Wits, South Africa; fUniversité de Bordeaux 3, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5060, Institut de Recherche sur les Archéomatériaux, Centre de recherche en physique appliquée à l’archéologie, 33607 Pessac, France; gUniversity of Oxford, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Dyson Perrins Building, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom; hUniversidad de Murcia, Departamento de Química Agrícola, Geología y Edafología, Facultad de Química, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain; iFundación de Estudios Murcianos Marqués de Corvera, 30566 Las Torres de Cotillas (Murcia), Spain; jUniversidad de Valencia, Instituto de Ciencia de los Materiales, 46071 Valencia, Spain; kCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7041, Archéologies et Sciences de l’Antiquité, 92023 Nanterre, France; and lUniversidad de Murcia, Área de Antropología Física, Facultad de Biología, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain Communicated by Erik Trinkaus, Washington University, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Reports and Posters
    Abstracts of Reports and Posters Amira Adaileh The Magdalenian site of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld The open air site of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld is located in Sachsen-Anhalt, Eastern Germany. It was discov- ered in the mid 1950´s in the immediate vicinity of the famous Magdalenian site of Saaleck. Since that time, archaeologists collected over 2000 lithic artifacts during systematical surveys. The technological and typological analyses of the lithic artifacts confirmed the assignment of Bad Kösen-Lengefeld to a late Magdalenian. Furthermore, the investigation of the surface collections brought forward information about the character of this camp site, the duration of its occupation and the pattern of raw material procure- ment. The fact that Bad Kösen-Lengefeld is located in a region with more than 100 Magdalenian sites fostered a comparison of the lithic inventory with other Magdalenian assemblages. Thus, allowing to spec- ify the position of the Lengefeld collection within the chorological context of the Magdalenian in Eastern Germany. Jehanne Affolter, Ludovic Mevel Raw material circulation in northern french alps and Jura during lateglacial interstadial : method, new data and paleohistoric implication Since fifteen years the study of the characterization and origin of flint resources used by Magdalenian and Azilian groups in northern French Alps and Jura have received significant research work. Diverse and well distributed spatially, some of these resources were used and disseminated throughout the late Upper Paleolithic. Which changes do we observe during the Magdalenian then for the Azilian? The results of petrographic analysis and techno-economic analysis to several archaeological sites allow us to assess dia- chronic changes in economic behavior of these people and discuss the significance of these results.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Information
    The National Museum of Prehistory Practical information At the same time place of memory for the History of Prehistory, place of en.musee-prehistoire-eyzies.fr conservation of archaeological objects, study center and place of dissemination Terrace of constantly increasing knowledge, the National Museum of Prehistory Castle has been, since its founding at the beginning of the 20th century, a place Address for under 26s from Europe of reference for prehistorians as well as visitors from all over the world. Musée national de Préhistoire and on the 1FREE st Sunday of each It was created in 1913 thanks to Denis Peyrony in the sixteenth century castle. After a 1 rue du Musée month rst extension in the late 1960s (Froideveaux buildings), the current museum, designed 24260 Les Eyzies by the Parisian architect Jean-Pierre Bu , was inaugurated in 2004. Upper Gallery Opening Hours Lifestyles - Art and rites July and August | 9.30 am – 6.30 pm every day KEY EXHIBITS June and September | 9.30 am – 6 pm, closed on Tuesdays October to May | 9. 30 am – 12.30 pm and 2 pm – 5.30 pm, closed on Tuesdays Visit itinerary Closed on 25th December and 1st January Last admission 45 minutes before closing time Grand Abri Evacuation of the Lower gallery 30 minutes before closing time Statue View point Services -Ticket o ce / shop / individual bookings | Tel. 00 33 (0)5 53 06 45 49 Lower Gallery -Booking for Conferences at the Museum Auditorium | Tel. 00 33 (0)5 53 06 45 49 Cultures and environments -Group bookings | Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Lukenya Hill, Kenya)
    Late Pleistocene age and archaeological context for the hominin calvaria from GvJm-22 (Lukenya Hill, Kenya) Christian A. Tryona,1, Isabelle Crevecoeurb, J. Tyler Faithc, Ravid Ekshtaina, Joelle Nivensd, David Pattersone, Emma N. Mbuaf, and Fred Spoorg,h aDepartment of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; bUnité Mixte de Recherche 5199, de la Préhistoire à l’Actuel: Culture, Environnement, et Anthropologie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Bordeaux, 33615 Talence, France; cArchaeology Program, School of Social Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; dDepartment of Anthropology, New York University, New York, NY 10003; eCenter for the Advanced Study of Hominid Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052; fNational Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya 00100; gDepartment of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany; and hDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, WC1E 6BT London, United Kingdom Edited by Erik Trinkaus, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, and approved January 16, 2015 (received for review September 19, 2014) Kenya National Museums Lukenya Hill Hominid 1 (KNM-LH 1) is Hominid 1 (KNM-LH 1) partial calvaria from site GvJm-22 at a Homo sapiens partial calvaria from site GvJm-22 at Lukenya Hill, Lukenya Hill, Kenya, the only eastern African fossil hominin Kenya, associated with Later Stone Age (LSA) archaeological de- from a Last Glacial Maximum [LGM; 19–26.4 kya (19)] LSA posits. KNM-LH 1 is securely dated to the Late Pleistocene, and archaeological context. We construct a revised accelerator mass samples a time and region important for understanding the origins spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon chronology built on 26 new of modern human diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Homo Aestheticus’
    Conceptual Paper Glob J Arch & Anthropol Volume 11 Issue 3 - June 2020 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Shuchi Srivastava DOI: 10.19080/GJAA.2020.11.555815 Man and Artistic Expression: Emergence of ‘Homo Aestheticus’ Shuchi Srivastava* Department of Anthropology, National Post Graduate College, University of Lucknow, India Submission: May 30, 2020; Published: June 16, 2020 *Corresponding author: Shuchi Srivastava, Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, National Post Graduate College, An Autonomous College of University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India Abstract Man is a member of animal kingdom like all other animals but his unique feature is culture. Cultural activities involve art and artistic expressions which are the earliest methods of emotional manifestation through sign. The present paper deals with the origin of the artistic expression of the man, i.e. the emergence of ‘Homo aestheticus’ and discussed various related aspects. It is basically a conceptual paper; history of art begins with humanity. In his artistic instincts and attainments, man expressed his vigour, his ability to establish a gainful and optimistictherefore, mainlyrelationship the secondary with his environmentsources of data to humanizehave been nature. used for Their the behaviorsstudy. Overall as artists findings was reveal one of that the man selection is artistic characteristics by nature suitableand the for the progress of the human species. Evidence from extensive analysis of cave art and home art suggests that humans have also been ‘Homo aestheticus’ since their origins. Keywords: Man; Art; Artistic expression; Homo aestheticus; Prehistoric art; Palaeolithic art; Cave art; Home art Introduction ‘Sahityasangeetkalavihinah, Sakshatpashuh Maybe it was the time when some African apelike creatures to 7 million years ago, the first human ancestors were appeared.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Relationships Between Human Adaptive Responses and Ecology Via Eco-Cultural Niche Modeling William E
    Assessing relationships between human adaptive responses and ecology via eco-cultural niche modeling William E. Banks To cite this version: William E. Banks. Assessing relationships between human adaptive responses and ecology via eco- cultural niche modeling. Archaeology and Prehistory. Universite Bordeaux 1, 2013. hal-01840898 HAL Id: hal-01840898 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01840898 Submitted on 11 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Thèse d'Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches Université de Bordeaux 1 William E. BANKS UMR 5199 PACEA – De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel : Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie Assessing Relationships between Human Adaptive Responses and Ecology via Eco-Cultural Niche Modeling Soutenue le 14 novembre 2013 devant un jury composé de: Michel CRUCIFIX, Chargé de Cours à l'Université catholique de Louvain, Belgique Francesco D'ERRICO, Directeur de Recherche au CRNS, Talence Jacques JAUBERT, Professeur à l'Université de Bordeaux 1, Talence Rémy PETIT, Directeur de Recherche à l'INRA, Cestas Pierre SEPULCHRE, Chargé de Recherche au CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette Jean-Denis VIGNE, Directeur de Recherche au CNRS, Paris Table of Contents Summary of Past Research Introduction ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-03-15-NAC-Jelgersma-Bsc
    Abstract Montagne Noire, part of the southern Massif Central in France, is the border between two climate types and therefore, it has always been subject to major and minor changes in temperature, rainfall and vegetation. This study aims to reconstruct the local paleoclimate of southern France by using a multi-proxy approach based on mineralogical (X-ray diffraction), geochemical (stable isotopes: C, O, H) and microscopic (scanning electron, petrographic and colour) analyses in a speleothem from Mélagues, located on the northern side of Montagne Noire. Temperature, rainfall and vegetation changes over time in the Mélagues region have been studied using the stable isotopic composition recorded in the speleothem. Although no dating of this speleothem is available yet, this study also examined possible relations with other regions and climate oscillations. Microscopic analyses of thin sections together with XRD analyses allowed us to determine the morphology, texture and mineralogy of the speleothem, which is composed of a mixture of magnesium calcite (∼70%), dolomite (∼25%, possibly formed through diagenetic processes) and a very low content of quartz (∼5%). Partial dissolution (∼5%) of the speleothem led to small voids (<40 µm) that were subsequently (partially) refilled by bacteria and microorganisms. Four columnar fabrics (compact, open, elongated and spherulitic) are observable in the studied speleothem, along with micrite, microsparite and mosaic fabrics. All these fabrics reflect (post-)depositional and environmental changes. The average temperature (∼14.8 °C) and vegetation (C3 plants) during deposition resemble the present-day temperature (14.8 ± 0.9 °C) and vegetation around our study site. Relatively high average 18O values (-4.38‰, 1σ ≈ 0.37) and relatively low average 13C values (-9.36‰, 1σ ≈ 0.55) of the stalagmite led us to interpret that the stalagmite was mainly deposited in a relatively warm and dry period, while seasonal precipitation from the Mediterranean Sea dominates the record.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Concept of Home at Hunter-Gatherer Sites in Upper Paleolithic Europe and Epipaleolithic Southwest Asia
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Homes for hunters?: Exploring the concept of home at hunter-gatherer sites in upper paleolithic Europe and epipaleolithic Southwest Asia Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9nt6f73n Journal Current Anthropology, 60(1) ISSN 0011-3204 Authors Maher, LA Conkey, M Publication Date 2019-02-01 DOI 10.1086/701523 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Current Anthropology Volume 60, Number 1, February 2019 91 Homes for Hunters? Exploring the Concept of Home at Hunter-Gatherer Sites in Upper Paleolithic Europe and Epipaleolithic Southwest Asia by Lisa A. Maher and Margaret Conkey In both Southwest Asia and Europe, only a handful of known Upper Paleolithic and Epipaleolithic sites attest to aggregation or gatherings of hunter-gatherer groups, sometimes including evidence of hut structures and highly structured use of space. Interpretation of these structures ranges greatly, from mere ephemeral shelters to places “built” into a landscape with meanings beyond refuge from the elements. One might argue that this ambiguity stems from a largely functional interpretation of shelters that is embodied in the very terminology we use to describe them in comparison to the homes of later farming communities: mobile hunter-gatherers build and occupy huts that can form campsites, whereas sedentary farmers occupy houses or homes that form communities. Here we examine some of the evidence for Upper Paleolithic and Epipaleolithic structures in Europe and Southwest Asia, offering insights into their complex “functions” and examining perceptions of space among hunter-gatherer communities. We do this through examination of two contemporary, yet geographically and culturally distinct, examples: Upper Paleolithic (especially Magdalenian) evidence in Western Europe and the Epipaleolithic record (especially Early and Middle phases) in Southwest Asia.
    [Show full text]