DOCSLIB.ORG

Trotsky's War Correspondence from the Balkan Wars

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trotsky's War Correspondence from the Balkan Wars War and Memory: Trotsky’s War Correspondence from the Balkan Wars Maria TODOROVA* Abstract Introduction Based on a critical reading of Trotsky’s In the fall of 1912, Trotsky was sent celebrated The War Correspondence, this from Vienna to the Balkans as a military article addresses the complex links between war and memory. It offers a detailed analysis correspondent of Kievskaya Mysl to cover of the correspondence, arguing for its present the events of the Balkan Wars under relevance in several aspects, beyond its polemical the pen name Antid Oto. Trotsky, born brilliance: firstly, its detailed information and Lev Davidovich Bronstein, had escaped personal evaluation of the socialist movement in the Balkans; secondly, its testimonies of from his exile after the 1905 Russian wounded officers, soldiers, and prisoners of war, Revolution and by 1907 had settled in reproduced in extenso, in combination with Vienna. Most of his efforts were spent interviews with politicians, serve as a rarely on reuniting the different Menshevik preserved primary source. The article considers The War Correspondence’s formative significance and Bolshevik factions in exile. From on Trotsky himself by juxtaposing it with his 1908 until 1912 he published the hugely later autobiography and political activities, and popular Pravda (not to be confused follows his evolution from a passionate defender with the later Leninist Pravda), which of liberalism to one of its most bitter opponents. 1 It finally utilises the distinction between lieux was smuggled into Russia. He also and milieu de mémoire to comment on the contributed to the Bolshevik (Proletary) present memory of wars and the centenary of and the Menshevik (Luch) papers, as the Balkan Wars. well as to German and Belgian socialist periodicals. However, he earned his Key Words living, supporting his family as well as Pravda (co-edited and co-financed by Trotsky, Balkan Wars, memory, war, Adolph Joffe and Matvey Skobelev), socialism, liberalism. almost exclusively from the articles that he contributed to Kievskaya Mysl. At the * Professor of History at the University of Illinois time, this was the paper with the largest at Urbana-Champaign. circulation in Kiev, and the most popular 5 PERCEPTIONS, Summer 2013, Volume XVIII, Number 2, pp. 5-27. Maria Todorova liberal and leftist paper in the south of was translated into English only in Russia. Trotsky wrote on diverse topics, 1980 under the slightly misleading title from Ibsen, Maupassant and Nietzsche The War Correspondence of Leon Trotsky. to the plight of the Russian peasantry. The Balkan Wars 1912-13, highlighting He jestingly coined the pen name Antid the second (and, granted, the largest) Oto, having stumbled across the Italian part. It was reprinted in 1993 to great word ‘antidoto’, in order to ‘inject the acclaim as a primary source on the Marxist antidote into legitimate [sic] Balkans, at the height of the Wars for the newspapers’.2 Yugoslav Succession, named the Third Balkan War.4 The War Correspondence From October 1912 until November has been hailed as a masterpiece, and 1913, Trotsky wrote several dozen articles Isaac Deutscher compared Trotsky’s published in Kievskaya Mysl as well as in experience ‘as a conscientious military Luch and Den. These correspondences, correspondent [that] would one day be supplemented by some additional of use to the founder of the Red Army’ articles as well as a few unpublished to Edward Gibbon’s experience as a items from his archive, appeared in book Captain of the Hampshire Grenadiers, form in 1926 as the sixth of the twelve which he utilised as a historian of the volumes of his uncompleted Sochineniya Roman Empire.5 [Works], published between 1924 and 1927.3 The original title of volume When, seventeen years later, in 1929, six was ‘The Balkans and the Balkan Trotsky penned his autobiography in War’ [‘Balkany i balkanskaia voina’] Istanbul, he reiterated the significance and it was part of the second sub-series of his experience: ‘In many respects, this ‘On the Historical Threshold’ [‘Pered was an important preparation not only istoricheskim rubezhom’] of his collected for 1914, but for 1917 as well.’6 Yet works. The editorial introduction of the he devoted barely a page and a half to 1924 volume provided a brief historical this episode, and did not explain in any background of the Eastern Question and depth what it was that was so significant grouped Trotsky’s writing in three parts: about it. He summarised his articles in the first- ‘On the Threshold of War’ one sentence as an ‘attack on the falsity [‘U poroga voiny] - comprising articles of Slavophilism, on chauvinism in written between 1908 and 1912; the general, on the illusions of war, on the second on the war itself [‘Voina’]; the scientifically organised system for duping third dedicated to post-war Romania public opinion’, and on Bulgarian [‘Poslevoennaia Rumynia’]. This volume atrocities against wounded and captured 6 Trotsky’s War Correspondence from the Balkan Wars Turks, which put him at odds with a whole array of politicians and literary the Russian liberal press. This, then, figures (Nikola Pašić, Lazar Paču, Stojan encapsulated Trotsky’s memory of his Novaković, Constantin Dobrogeanu- Balkan experience. While he cautioned Gherea, Christian Rakovsky, Andranik that ‘memory is not an automatic Ozanian); in-depth analyses of great reckoner’ and ‘never disinterested’, he power- especially Russian- diplomacy was somewhat disingenuous about the and its aims in the Balkans. Trotsky is stated deficiencies in his memories of especially informative on the state of different types. He claimed that his social democracy in these countries, in topographical and musical memories particular Bulgaria, where the socialist were weak, his visual and linguistic parties were strong. His descriptions of memories fairly mediocre, but his and conversations with wounded soldiers memory for ideas considerably above and officers as well as with prisoners of average.7 In fact, only some of his earlier war are heart-rending. He also writes ideas persisted, i.e., were remembered, powerfully on the larger framework of only the ones that did not contradict the the War, describing in detail the feelings narrative persona that was constructed to in the rear, the queues, the anticipation make sense of his memory. His brilliant, and the fear. Throughout, his prose biting and not always fair attacks on shines with vitality, often with verbal liberals, both in The War Correspondence brilliance, especially when his polemicist and especially in My Life,8 neatly omitted temperament is challenged. the liberal persona he himself inhabited in 1912. Trotsky welcomed the 1908 The War Correspondence moves from revolution and the newly analytical pieces to impressionistic convened parliament, but in a dispatches, to what de facto amounts succinct and prescient analysis to interviews, and to political portraits. clearly described the fault There are excellent surveys of the internal lines between centralisers and economic, social and political situation in federalists. each of the belligerent countries (Serbia, Bulgaria, the Ottoman Empire after the Young Turk Revolution, and Romania) as And still, one wonders what is left well as their mutual relations; a prescient of these articles today, one hundred section on the Armenian Question; years after they were written? While the colourful and well-informed portraits of analyses are interesting, do they have a 7 Maria Todorova cognitive significance aside from their war correspondence is the curious mix historical value of being written by of conventional Marxist dogma, Russian such a major figure as Trotsky? Are they revolutionary patriotism with notes of more informative than the dispatches great power condescendence and, most of dozens of other war correspondents surprisingly, classical liberal posturing of major European papers? Were they reminiscent of this undying breed in revolutionary in their analysis even at praise of Western civilisation. the time? Apart from being a testimony The first section of the volume provides to Trotsky’s rhetorical and polemical the background to the Balkan Crisis of brilliance, would we care to go back to them? Some people actually did go back 1912 by collecting Trotsky’s newspaper to them in the 1990s, in order to find articles on the Young Turk Revolution confirmation of their often completely of 1908, as well as on issues of Balkan opposing political preferences or social democracy (mostly on the prejudices.9 Bulgarian but also partly on the Serbian case). The two articles on the Ottoman There are three aspects that make Empire [‘The Turkish Revolution and them interesting and relevant today. the Tasks of the Proletariat’ and ‘The One is the very detailed information and New Turkey’] came out in Pravda (# 2, personal evaluation that Trotsky gives of 17/30 December 1908) and Kievskaya the socialist movement in the Balkans Mysl (#3, 3 January 1909). Turkey, at the time. This, to my knowledge, has this ‘hornet’s nest of the Near East’ been little if at all utilised. Secondly, had been a tyrannical state ‘from times there are the several sections made 10 from testimonies of wounded Bulgarian immemorial’; it was unreformable, the officers and soldiers, as well as witness epitome of backwardness, stagnation and accounts of Turkish prisoners of war, despotism. Its industrial development reproduced in extenso as quotes. There are was obstructed because of the Sultan’s 11 also lengthy citations from the interviews fear of the proletariat; had they read with politicians. Lastly, there is the his writing, the Young Turks would have question of The War Correspondence’s been surprised to learn that their 1908 formative significance on Trotsky himself revolution was ‘the most recent echo as well as the question of memory in of the Russian Revolution’ [of 1905], general, which is the principal topic of which caused a fiery surge of proletarian this article.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Colloquium Paper January 12, 1984 STALINISM VERSUS
    Colloquium Paper January 12, 1984 STALINISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM? A Reconsideration by Robert C. Tucker Princeton University with comment by Peter Reddaway London School of Economics and Political Science Fellows Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Draft paper not for publication or quotation without written permission from the authors. STALINISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM? A Reconsideration Although not of ten openly debated~ the issue I propose to address is probably the deepest and most divisive in Soviet studies. There is good ground for Stephen Cohen's characterization of it as a "quintessential his­ torical and interpretive question"! because it transcends most of the others and has to do with the whole of Russia's historical development since the Bolshevik Revolution. He formulates it as the question of the relationship "between Bolshevism and Stalinism.'' Since the very existence of something properly called Stalinism is at issue here, I prefer a somewhat different mode of formulation. There are two (and curiously, only two) basically opposed positions on the course of development that Soviet Russia took starting around 1929 when Stalin, having ousted his opponents on the Left and the Right, achieved primacy, although not yet autocratic primacy, within the Soviet regime. The first position, Which may be seen as the orthodox one, sees that course of development as the fulfillment, under new conditions, of Lenin's Bolshevism. All the main actions taken by the Soviet regime under Stalin's leadership were, in other words, the fulfillment of what had been prefigured in Leninism (as Lenin's Bolshevism came to be called after Lenin died).
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
    The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace
    The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace, 1893-1912 By Martin Valkov Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Prof. Tolga Esmer Second Reader: Prof. Roumen Daskalov CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2010 “Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author.” CEU eTD Collection ii Abstract The current thesis narrates an important episode of the history of South Eastern Europe, namely the history of the Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and its demand for political autonomy within the Ottoman Empire. Far from being “ancient hatreds” the communal conflicts that emerged in Macedonia in this period were a result of the ongoing processes of nationalization among the different communities and the competing visions of their national projects. These conflicts were greatly influenced by inter-imperial rivalries on the Balkans and the combination of increasing interference of the Great European Powers and small Balkan states of the Ottoman domestic affairs. I argue that autonomy was a multidimensional concept covering various meanings white-washed later on into the clean narratives of nationalism and rebirth.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism and Communism
    Routledge Revivals Terrorism and Communism First published in English in 1920, this is a reissue of Karl Kautsky's seminal work dealing with the origins and history of the forces at work in revolutionary epochs, which offers path breaking insights into the development of civilisation. The opening chapters, dealing with eighteenth century France, are of special interest to the student of the French revolution. The section devoted to the Commune of Paris offers a stimulating and provocative description of this famous government of the working class. The reissue of this controversial and extraordinary work will be welcomed by all those interested in the history of Communism in particular and the theory and history of revolution in general. Terrorism and Communism A Contribution to the Natural History of Revolution Karl Kautsky Translated by W. H. Kerridge First published in 1920 by George Allen & Unwin This edition first published in 2011 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Publisher’s Note The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original copies may be apparent.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cultural History of US Involvement in Axis-Occupied Yugoslavia
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Master's Theses 2018 The Power of Narratives: A Cultural History of US Involvement in Axis-Occupied Yugoslavia William P. Fouse University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses Recommended Citation Fouse, William P., "The Power of Narratives: A Cultural History of US Involvement in Axis-Occupied Yugoslavia" (2018). Open Access Master's Theses. Paper 1195. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses/1195 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE POWER OF NARRATIVES: A CULTURAL HISTORY OF US INVOLVEMENT IN AXIS-OCCUPIED YUGOSLAVIA BY WILLIAM P. FOUSE A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2018 MASTER OF ARTS THESIS OF WILLIAM P. FOUSE APPROVED: Thesis Committee: Major Professor Robert W. Widell, Jr. James Mace Ward Valerie Karno Nasser H. Zawia DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2018 ABSTRACT My thesis examines the ways in which narratives about Axis-occupied Yugoslavia developed within the United States over the course of World War II and identifies how these narratives influenced the development of American foreign policy. Methodologically, I utilize the literary theories of Northrop Frye and Hayden White as a means of narrative analysis. Frye categorizes narratives as romance, comedy, tragedy, or satire.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Soviet Terror
    HI449 The Revolution Devours its Children: The History of Soviet Terror Fall 2018 Wed 2:30-5:15 pm History Dept #504 Пишет сыночку мать: A mother writes to her son: 'Сыночек мой родной, 'My dear beloved son, Ведь и Россия вся- You know that all of Russia is Это концлагерь большой.' A big concentration camp.' -From the song “Vorkuta” Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn The USSR was one of the most violent regimes in history, and most of the terror was perpetrated by the state against its own people. The Soviet regime promised its citizens a life of leisure, peace, and abundance, and one way it sought to establish this utopia was by purifying society through violence. From its founding days, the state used terror to create social stability, build industry, and transform the minds and bodies of its citizens. We will examine how terror played an integral role in the revolutionary project, how its institutions—show trials, confessions, and concentration camps— developed. We will work with a variety of sources including official decrees, secret party documents, diaries, court testimonies, interrogations, fiction, films, and historiography. Three questions will drive our study: Peri, 1 1. How did the Soviet people experience and understand state violence as a part of everyday life? 2. How was it that mass terror both kept the Soviet state in power as well as eventually unseated it? 3. How can we most judiciously and effectively use personal testimony, which functions both as art and as document, in crafting histories of the terror experience? Instructor: Professor Alexis Peri [email protected] 226 Bay State Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCS Newsletter 6 2009.Pdf
    AMERICAN RESEARCH CENTER IN SOFIA NEWSLETTER No. 6, NOVEMBER 2009 The American Research Center in Sofia (ARCS, compared by literary critics to Simeon Radev’s www.einaudi.cornell.edu/arcs), established in classic Builders of Modern Bulgaria. The 2004, is dedicated to research in the humanities introduction will be written by Professor Mark and social sciences and represents a consortium Kramer, Director of the Project for Cold War of educational institutions registered in North Studies at the Davis Center for Russian and America. ARCS is a Member of the Council of Eurasian Studies at Harvard University, an American Overseas Research Centers and an eminent authority on Cold War history. This will be the first publication of ARCS (scheduled for Educational Member of the American Chamber of Spring 2010) in a series of monographs on Commerce in Bulgaria. Thanks to a generous Bulgarian history from antiquity through the donation by the Packard Humanities Institute, modern age. ARCS acquired in early 2008 its permanent home in Sofia, consisting of a four-level building on May 28, 2009. A group of students from the property of over 16,000 sq. ft. University of Alaska (Anchorage), led by Professor Christine Hanson on an educational trip NEWS IN BRIEF to Bulgaria, the Republic of Macedonia, Greece and Turkey, visited the ARCS headquarters and We are pleased to announce that ARCS has been met with Professor Kevin Clinton, Chair of the awarded a National Endowment for the ARCS Managing Committee, and Dr. Nikola Humanities (NEH) Challenge Grant in the amount Theodossiev, ARCS Associate Academic Director. of $750,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Trotsky and the Problem of Soviet Bureaucracy
    TROTSKY AND THE PROBLEM OF SOVIET BUREAUCRACY by Thomas Marshall Twiss B.A., Mount Union College, 1971 M.A., University of Pittsburgh, 1972 M.S., Drexel University, 1997 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2009 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Thomas Marshall Twiss It was defended on April 16, 2009 and approved by William Chase, Professor, Department of History Ronald H. Linden, Professor, Department of Political Science Ilya Prizel, Professor, Department of Political Science Dissertation Advisor: Jonathan Harris, Professor, Department of Political Science ii Copyright © by Thomas Marshall Twiss 2009 iii TROTSKY AND THE PROBLEM OF SOVIET BUREAUCRACY Thomas Marshall Twiss, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2009 In 1917 the Bolsheviks anticipated, on the basis of the Marxist classics, that the proletarian revolution would put an end to bureaucracy. However, soon after the revolution many within the Bolshevik Party, including Trotsky, were denouncing Soviet bureaucracy as a persistent problem. In fact, for Trotsky the problem of Soviet bureaucracy became the central political and theoretical issue that preoccupied him for the remainder of his life. This study examines the development of Leon Trotsky’s views on that subject from the first years after the Russian Revolution through the completion of his work The Revolution Betrayed in 1936. In his various writings over these years Trotsky expressed three main understandings of the nature of the problem: During the civil war and the first years of NEP he denounced inefficiency in the distribution of supplies to the Red Army and resources throughout the economy as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Interviewing Vampires
    November 1999 CLASCLASnotes Vol. 13 The University of Florida College ofnotes Liberal Arts and Sciences No. 11 The Dean’s Musings Interviewing Vampires Lombardi Historian Luise White’s new book examines the social and political significance of African vampire stories Sometime in the future a history onducting an interview with a will be written about the University of Florida, at which time the Lombardi vampire might sound like pure years will be given a certain perspec- Hollywood, but it’s all in a day’s tive. It’s much too early now. JVL was Cwork for Luise White. A professor of Afri- too strong a character, and the memo- can history, White conducted field research ries are too intense for any detached on vampirism in Africa for her new book evaluation at this time. Only the foolish Speaking With Vampires: Rumor and His- would try. Such as a dean who served tory in East and Central Africa (Studies on during all of Lombardi’s term. the History of Society and Culture), which As anyone knows who met Lombardi will be published by the University of Cali- for five minutes, he was a mercurial, fornia Press early next year. charismatic leader. His style was not White first encountered African vampire for everyone, but the vast majority saw in him a passionate, tireless advocate stories while writing a book on prostitution for UF, a president who did not cotton in Nairobi, Kenya. Interested in writing to those whose vision of UF was less a history using rumors, she began collect- demanding than his own.
    [Show full text]
  • Balkan Konferanslari Bağlaminda Türkiye
    İSTANBUL ÜN İVERS İTES İ ATATÜRK İLKELER İ VE İNKILÂP TAR İHİ ENST İTÜSÜ ATATÜRK İLKELER İ VE İNKILÂP TAR İHİ ANAB İLİM DALI BALKAN KONFERANSLARI BA ĞLAMINDA TÜRK İYE BULGAR İSTAN İLİŞ KİLER İ YÜKSEK L İSANS TEZ İ Mehmet SAVCI 2901030002 Tez Danı şmanı: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Cevahir KAYAM İstanbul, 2007 1 İSTANBUL ÜN İVERS İTES İ ATATÜRK İLKELER İ VE İNKILÂP TAR İHİ ENST İTÜSÜ ATATÜRK İLKELER İ VE İNKILÂP TAR İHİ ANAB İLİM DALI BALKAN KONFERANSLARI BA ĞLAMINDA TÜRK İYE BULGAR İSTAN İLİŞ KİLER İ YÜKSEK L İSANS TEZ İ Mehmet SAVCI 2901030002 Tez Danı şmanı: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Cevahir KAYAM (DÜZELTILMI Ş TEZ) İstanbul, 2007 2 YÜKSEK L İSANS TEZ İNE UYGULANAN DÜZELTMELER 1.Tez yazım kılavuzuna göre hatalı olan yazım ve biçim hataları düzeltilmi ştir. 2.Konu ile ilgili bilgi sa ğlayan ve ayrıntılı konuları yazarları ile birlikte açıklanan yüksek lisans ve doktora tezleri ara ştırılarak elde edilen bilgiler teze dâhil edilmi ştir. 3.Tez konusu ile ilgili bilgi edinilebilece ği tavsiye edilen Faruk Sönmezo ğlu, Baskın Oran, Fahir Armao ğlu, Sabahattin Özel, Yusuf Hikmet Bayur, Abdulahat Ak şin vd. yazarlar ile Türk Tarih Kurumu yayınları incelenerek elde edilen bilgiler teze dâhil edilmi ştir. 4.Bilgi edinilen Bulgarca yayınlar hakkında açıklama yapılmı ştır. 5.Tezin ekleri için liste yapılmı ştır. 6.Jüri üyelerine da ğıtılacak tez nüshalarının dizimine özen gösterilmi ştir. 7.Düstur ve TBMM zabıt cerideleri tekrar taranmı ştır. 8.Tezin özet bölümü yeniden yazılmı ştır. 9.Tezin kapsamı daraltılarak Balkan Konferansları üzerine daha fazla izahatta bulunulmu ştur. 10. Tez mu ğlâk ifadelerden arındırılarak okuyucunun kolay anlayabilece ği bölümlendirme yapılmı ştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptionsjournal of International Affairs
    PERCEPTIONSJOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS War and Memory: Trotsky’s War Correspondence from the Balkan Wars Maria TODOROVA Of Other Balkan Wars: Affective Worlds of Modern and Traditional (The Bulgarian Example) Snezhana DIMITROVA Trajectories of Post-Communist Transformation Sabrina P. RAMET Post-1989 Political Change in the Balkan States: The Legacy of the Early Illiberal Transition Years Othon ANASTASAKIS Balkans and Balkanisation: Carnegie Commission’s Reports on the Balkan Wars Predrag SIMIĆ Macedonia and the Ohrid Framework Agreement: Framed Past, Elusive Future Sasho RIPILOSKI & Stevo PENDAROVSKI Turkey and the Balkans: Constructing a Common Future Birgül DEMİRTAŞ Book Reviews Summer 2013 Volume XVIII - Number 2 ISSN 1300-8641 PERCEPTIONS Editor in Chief Bülent Aras Deputy Editors Şaban Kardaş • Mesut Özcan • Murat Yeşiltaş Book Review Editor Şule Toktaş Managing Editor Engin Karaca International Advisory Board Nuri Yurdusev Middle East Technical University Fuat Keyman Sabancı University John Hobson University of Sheffield Talip Küçükcan Marmara University Ayşe Kadıoğlu Sabancı University Mustafa Kibaroğlu Okan University Burhanettin Duran Istanbul Şehir University Selçuk Çolakoğlu Yıldırım Beyazıt University Pınar Bilgin Bilkent University Oktay Tanrısever Middle East Technical University Tuncay Kardaş Sakarya University Şaban Kardaş TOBB-ETU Mesut Özcan Center for Strategic Research Homepage: http://www.sam.gov.tr The Center for Strategic Research (Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi- SAM) conducts research on Turkish foreign policy, regional studies and international relations, and makes scholarly and scientific assessments of relevant issues. It is a consultative body of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs providing strategic insights, independent data and analysis to decision makers in government. As a nonprofit organization, SAM is chartered by law and has been active since May 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Balkanism in the Political Discourse of Tudman's Croatia
    This is a repository copy of Balkan Is Beautiful: Balkanism in the Political Discourse of Tudman's Croatia. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/44949/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Razsa, M. and Lindstrom, N. orcid.org/0000-0003-2042-2465 (2004) Balkan Is Beautiful: Balkanism in the Political Discourse of Tudman's Croatia. East European Politics and Societies. pp. 628-650. ISSN 0888-3254 https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325404266939 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 10.1177/0888325404266939Balkan European Is BeautifulEast Politics and Societies ARTICLE Balkan Is Beautiful: Balkanism in the Political Discourse of Tudman’s Croatia Maple Razsa and Nicole Lindstrom* This article examines the role of Balkanist discourse in Tu¦man’s Croatia. Todorova’s concept of Balkanism provides a useful theoretical framework through which to explore the deployment of Balkanist stereotypes against Croatia by Western leaders.
    [Show full text]