DOCSLIB.ORG

Speed Cameras: Designed for 20Mph Limits

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Speed Cameras: Designed for 20Mph Limits Speed Cameras: Designed for 20mph Limits Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities Safer Average speed enforcement SPECS: Safer, Smoother, Greener, Fairer 300+ SPECS installations to date Smoother 50+ routes with permanent equipment 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 & 70mph limits: Safer Large KSI reductions Smoother Traffic flows improve Greener Greener Lower emissions, improved economy Fairer High acceptance, low offence levels 20mph enforcement: • Too expensive? • Not legally permitted? Fairer Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities SPECS3 : widely implemented & understood Since HOTA in 1999, over 200 temporary and 30 permanent SPECS1 projects Since HOTA in 2009, over 50 temporary and 25 permanent SPECS3 projects with 14 SCPs Operated with 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70mph schemes Not a new concept and not just in roadworks! SPECS3 Location SCP SPECS3 Location SCP M3 / M25 junction Surrey A611 Annesley Nottinghamshire A60 Mansfield Road Nottingham A3 Hindhead Tunnel Surrey M25 QEII Bridge Essex A130 Canvey Way Essex A282 & M25 J2 - Dartford tolls Kent A14 Girton to Fen Ditton Cambridgeshire Blackwall Tunnel London A537 Macclesfield to Buxton Cheshire Aspley Lane Nottingham A52 Ropsley Lincolnshire A374 Plymouth Devon & Cornwall Marine Parade, Southend Essex B1096 Forty Foot Drain Cambridgeshire A38 Shenstone to Bassetts Pole Staffordshire A66 Bass Lake Cumbria A614 Old Rufford Road Nottinghamshire A149 Sutton Norfolk A465 Head of the Valleys Wales A631 Beckingham Nottinghamshire A55 Britannia Bridge Wales A6097 Epperstone Bypass Nottinghamshire A61 Sheffield South Yorkshire Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities Can 20mph be enforced? A common misunderstanding – it can be enforced SPECS cameras have done so, several times: • Gloucester • Tower Bridge There is a big • Upper Thames Street difference between • Blackwall Tunnel these two signs.... • Rotherhithe Tunnel ZONE • Southend Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities Average speed enforcement speed Average Why does 20mph enforcement work? enforcement 20mph does Why %age of vehicles • 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 0.00% 5.00% Behaviour at overt SPECS enforced locations predictable: is locations enforced atBehaviour overt SPECS 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Solutions to improve roads, journeys and and communities journeys roads, improve to Solutions 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 50mph 40mph 30mph 20mph Southend – case study Part of a ‘shared space’ installation • Guardrails & pelican crossings removed • Paving, water features & lighting installed SPECS3 POD installation Enforces a 20mph speed limit • NOT a 20mph zone Street furniture always in place Enforcement device relocated • Different sections can be made live • Alternative routes can be managed Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities Southend – case study System designed to be appropriate • Not 6m tall cantilevered columns • First use of ‘urban column’ POD devices can be moved without impact on compliance Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities Lighting Don’t want flashes or intense ‘puddles’ of bright white lighting: Recent images taken on the A614, Nottinghamshire from a new SPECS3 POD installation. Uses additional Infra Red (IR) flood lights on an unlit road. Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities 20 mph Area Design Concepts There are several ways a zone could be covered: • Cameras at all entry & exit points • Cameras throughout the monitored zone • Cameras supporting engineering measures Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities 20 mph Area Design Concepts There are several ways a zone could be covered: • Cameras at all entry & exit points • Cameras within the monitored zone • Cameras supporting engineering measures Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities 20 mph Area Design Concepts There are several ways a zone could be covered: • Cameras at all entry & exit points • Cameras throughout the monitored zone • Cameras supporting engineering measures Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities 20 mph Zone Design Concepts There is no blanket solution Every zone has its own local issues • Where are the hazards / casualties? • How do people drive through the zone? • What are the traffic volumes on each link? Camera technology plays a part • Speed cushions, chicanes, humps may complement them • Change to access and priorities • Vehicle activated signs Would drivers change their route? Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities Operational Issues There are some significant issues to address 20mph limit vs 20mph zone • Needs further consideration Police operational policy • Some forces don’t like to enforce 20mph Cost to install and operate • How is the cost justified and paid for? Clutter vs deterrent • Balance between conspicuity & street scene Enforcement levels • How many tickets are too many? Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities Future System... A new generation is soon to achieve Home Office Type Approval SPECS3 Vector Reduced installation cost Lower power requirement High resolution Revised approval, not a new device Fully compatible with SPECS3 Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities Bi-directional monitoring SPECS3 Vector can monitor both directions on a single carriageway road – Forward-facing in one direction – Rear-facing in the other direction Reduced minimum baseline of 75m between cameras – 250m minimum for standard SPECS3 Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities New street furniture A new generation of columns / mounts: • Lightweight construction • Smaller but distinctive • Passively safe SPECS3 VECTOR fully integrated module • No roadside cabinet • Fit for urban application • Can be fitted to existing columns Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities Summary 20mph limits can be enforced Legally and technically, it can be done The tools are now right Must be a site specific design Caution! Must be clear on why it is being done Not to be entered lightly Cameras only part of the answer Solutions to improve roads, journeys and communities Solutions to improve roads, journeys & communities GeoffSolutions Collins to improve [email protected], journeys and communities .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The GLA Roads Designation Order 2000
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2000 No. 1117 LONDON GOVERNMENT HIGHWAYS, ENGLAND The GLA Roads Designation Order 2000 Made - - - - 10th April 2000 Laid before Parliament 26th April 2000 Coming into force - - 22nd May 2000 The Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14A of the Highways Act 1980(1) hereby makes the following Order: Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the GLA Roads Designation Order 2000 and shall come into force on 22nd May 2000. Designation of GLA roads 2.—(1) The highways specified in the Schedule to this Order are hereby designated as GLA roads. (2) In accordance with section 14A(2) of the Highways Act 1980 3rd July 2000 is hereby specified as the date on which those highways are to become GLA roads. Interpretation of the Schedule 3. In the Schedule to this Order— (a) a reference to the boundary of London is a reference to the boundary of Greater London; (b) the description of a highway includes the intersection of that road and any other road that crosses it at the same level; and (c) the description of a highway which, or any length of which, is a trunk road includes any highway constructed as part of the trunk road for the purpose of relieving the main carriageway of the trunk road from local traffic. (1) 1980 c. 66; section 14A was inserted by section 260 of the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotherhithe Tunnel
    Rotherhithe Tunnel - Deformation Monitoring CLIENT: TFL/ TIDEWAY EAST / SIXENSE Senceive and Sixense worked together to design and implement a monitoring programme to safeguard crucial London road tunnel during construction of a nearby tunnel shaft Challenge Solution Outcome The Thames Tideway Tunnel will capture, store and move Monitoring experts at Sixense chose the Senceive FlatMesh™ Senceive provided a fully wireless and flexible monitoring almost all the untreated sewage and rainwater discharges wireless system as their monitoring solution. A total of system which could be installed quickly and easily within that currently overflow into the River Thames in central 74 high precision tilt sensor nodes were installed during the short night-time closures. The installed system was London. The Rotherhithe Tunnel sits in close proximity engineering closures over an eight-week period to monitor sufficiently robust to operate for years without maintenance to the Tideway East shaft site and there was a need to any convergence/divergence during the works. - therefore avoiding the disruption, cost and potential risks ensure that the construction work did not threaten the associated with repeated site visits. Impact on the structure integrity of the tunnel. The CVB consortium (Costain, VINCI Of these, 64 were installed directly onto the tunnel lining in and damage to the tiles was minimal as the nodes required Construction Grands Projets and Bachy Soletanche), along 16 arrays of four nodes. A further 10 nodes were mounted on just a single mounting point and minimal cabling. with Sixense as their appointed monitoring contractor, three-metre beams in a vertical shaft. The FlatMesh™ system required a monitoring system in place 12 months ahead allowed all the nodes to communicate with each other and The Senceive and Sixense teams worked together to modify of shaft construction to provide an adequate period measure sub-mm movements for an estimated project tiltmeter fixings in order to incorporate a 3D prism needed of baseline monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • HANDBOOK NVL 2014-15 Season 2 Contents
    HANDBOOK NVL 2014-15 season 2 Contents Introduction Competitions Commission Volley 123 Funding Team Details Men’s Super 8s Women’s Super 8s Men’s Division 1 Women’s Division 1 Men’s Division 2 North Men’s Division 2 South Women’s Division 2 North Women’s Division 2 South Men’s Division 3 Central Men’s Division 3 North Men’s Division 3 South East Men’s Division 3 South West Women’s Division 3 Central Women’s Division 3 North Women’s Division 3 South Men's Non-NVL Cup Teams Women's Non-NVL Cup Teams Venues Match Venues Fixtures Fixtures and Referee Appointment Information National Competition Dates Rules National Competition Rules Contacts Administrative Officers of the Association 3 NVL 2014-15 season 1 NVL 2014 – 15 season NVL 2014-15 season 4 Introduction Welcome to another National Volleyball League and Cup season and a special welcome to those 19 new teams that are joining the NVL this season. No matter what ever your results are I hope that you all enjoy this season’s volleyball. Last season saw the European Volleyball Federation (CEV) impose on us that all NVL Clubs follow the correct procedures for International Transfer of players. This effectively means that annually any player competing in the NVL whose Federation of Origin is not England would need to follow this procedure and pay the appropriate fee. We were successful in negotiating a phased implementation of this with it only applying to Super 8 teams last season. However this season Division 1 Clubs must also now follow this new procedure.
    [Show full text]
  • Leamouth Leam
    ROADS CLOSED SATURDAY 05:00 - 21:00 ROADS CLOSED SUNDAY 05:00TO WER 4 2- 12:30 ROADS CLOSED SUNDAY 05:00 - 14:00 3 3 ROUTE MAP ROADS CLOSED SUNDAY 05:00 - 18:00 A1 LEA A1 LEA THE GHERR KI NATCLIFF RATCLIFF RATCLIFF CANNING MOUTH R SATURDAY 4th AUGUST 05:00 – 21:00 MOUTH R SUNDAY 5th AUGUST 05:00 – 14:00 LIMEHOUSE WEST BECKTON AD AD BANK OF WHITECHAPEL BECKTON DOCK RO SUNDAY 5th AUGUST 14:00 – 18:00 TOWN OREGANO DRIVE OREGANO DRIVE CANNING LLOYDS BUILDING SOUTH ST PAUL S ENGL AND Limehouse DLR SEE MAP CUSTOM HOUSE EAST INDIA O EAST INDIA DOCK RO O ROYAL OPER A AD AD CATHED R AL LEAMOUTH DLR PARK OHO LIMEHOUSE LIMEHOUSBecktonE Park Y Y HOUSE Cannon Street Custom House DLR Prince Regent DLR Cyprus DLR Gallions Reach DLR BROMLEY RIGHT A A ROADS CLOSED SUNDAY 05:00 - 18:00 Royal Victoria DLR W W Mansion House COVENT Temple Blackfriars POPLAR DLR DLR Tower Gateway LE A MOUTH OCEA OCEA Monument COMMERC COMMERC V V GARDEN IAL ROAD East India RO UNDABOU T IAL ROAD ExCEL UNIVERSI T Y ROYAL ALBERT SIL SIL ITETIONAL CHASOPMERSETEL Tower Hill Blackwall DLR OF EAST LONDON SEE MAP BELOW RT R AIT HOUSE MILLENIUM ROUNDABOUT DLR Poplar E TOWN GALLE RY BRIDGE A13 VENU A13 VENUE SAFFRON A SAFFRON A SOUTHWARK THE TO WER Westferry DLR DLR BLACKWALL Embankment ROTHERHITH E THE MUSEUM AD AD CLEOPATRA’S BRIDGE OF LONDON EAST INDIA DOCK RO EAST INDIA DOCK RO LONDON WAPPING T UNNEL OF LONDON West India A13 A13 LEAMOUTH NEED LE SHADWELL LONDON CI T Y BRIDGE DOCK L A NDS Quay BILLINGSGATE AIRPOR T A13 K WEST INDIA DOCK RD K WEST INDIA DOCK RD LEA IN M ARKET IN LEAM RATCLIFF L L SE SE MOUT WAY TATE MODERN HMS BELFAST U U SPEN O O AD A N H H A AY A N W E TOWER E E 1 ASPEN 1 H R W E G IM IM 2 2 L L OREGANO DRIVE 0 W 0 OWER LEA CROSSING L CANNING P LOWER LEA CROSSIN BRIDGE 6 O 6 O EAST INDIA DOCK RO POR AD R THE O2 BL ACK WAL L Y T LIMEHOUSE PR ESTO NS A T A A C C HORSE SOUTHWARK W V RO AD T UNNEL O O E V T T .
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the French in London Liberty, Equality, Opportunity
    A history of the French in London liberty, equality, opportunity Edited by Debra Kelly and Martyn Cornick A history of the French in London liberty, equality, opportunity A history of the French in London liberty, equality, opportunity Edited by Debra Kelly and Martyn Cornick LONDON INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH Published by UNIVERSITY OF LONDON SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU First published in print in 2013. This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY- NCND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN 978 1 909646 48 3 (PDF edition) ISBN 978 1 905165 86 5 (hardback edition) Contents List of contributors vii List of figures xv List of tables xxi List of maps xxiii Acknowledgements xxv Introduction The French in London: a study in time and space 1 Martyn Cornick 1. A special case? London’s French Protestants 13 Elizabeth Randall 2. Montagu House, Bloomsbury: a French household in London, 1673–1733 43 Paul Boucher and Tessa Murdoch 3. The novelty of the French émigrés in London in the 1790s 69 Kirsty Carpenter Note on French Catholics in London after 1789 91 4. Courts in exile: Bourbons, Bonapartes and Orléans in London, from George III to Edward VII 99 Philip Mansel 5. The French in London during the 1830s: multidimensional occupancy 129 Máire Cross 6. Introductory exposition: French republicans and communists in exile to 1848 155 Fabrice Bensimon 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Closures on Sunday 22 August 2021
    ROAD CLOSURE INFORMATION IN YOUR AREA SUNDAY 22 AUGUST 2021 thebighalf.co.uk/road-closures #WERUNASONE The Vitality Big Half returns on Sunday 22 August 2021, when thousands of runners of all ages and abilities take to the streets of Tower Hamlets, ROAD CLOSURES ON Southwark, Lewisham and Greenwich. SUNDAY 22 AUGUST 2021 Now in its fourth year, The Vitality Big Half is The following pages provide details of the road TOWER HAMLETS SOUTHWARK getting more people, especially those from the closures and the vehicle crossing points that ROAD NAME CLOSED OPEN ROAD NAME CLOSED OPEN four host boroughs, into running. The event will operate during specific times on the day to Tower Bridge Approach 04:00 14:00 Tooley Street brings people together to share in the amazing allow you access across the event route. 06:00 15:00 experience of running through the streets of Tower Bridge 04:00 14:00 Jamaica Road London with family, friends and some of the Advance warning signs will be displayed in 06:00 15:00 Tower Hill 04:00 14:00 Brunel Road world’s best athletes. affected roads in the build-up to the event. 06:00 15:00 Police officers and stewards will be present East Smithfield 04:00 14:00 Salter Road There are a host of running distances available, on the day to help answer your queries and to 06:00 15:00 Limehouse Link Tunnel 04:00 14:00 Redriff Road from a challenging half marathon to a free one- ensure a safe and secure event.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Build the Silvertown Tunnel?
    Why build the Silvertown Tunnel? Over the last 30 years east London has changed with the redevelopment of former industrial areas into major commercial and residential districts. The development of Canary Wharf, Stratford, the Royal Docks and the Greenwich Peninsula has had a major impact on the demand for travel across the wider area. The river, once a major barrier to north-south movement, has been crossed five times between Rotherhithe and Woolwich by new railway lines. The existing East London Line at Wapping has been transformed and the Emirates Air Line Cable Car has been introduced to provide a dedicated crossing for pedestrians and cyclists. The first Crossrail trains will enter service in late 2018, providing a further cross-river rail link at Woolwich. The map below shows the cross-river public transport links that are available in east London. Public transport cross-river links in east London There has not however been a comparable investment in London’s road network. London’s roads are a vital part of our transport network. Roads link our communities; providing access to education, jobs and services and enabling businesses to trade, creating new employment. Whilst it is important that as many trips as possible are made by public transport, there will always be a need for some journeys to be made by road. For example, while there are over 6.5 million journeys made by bus every weekday; freight and other vital services are moved almost exclusively by road. The lack of crossings for vehicles The average distance between vehicle crossings in central London is 1km, and in west London it is 2km.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustrans' Manifesto for London 2020
    Sustrans’ manifesto for London 2020 Towards a healthier, happier city Foreword London is a world city and a global leader. is ‘sustainable, efficient, beautiful, An open, tolerant, thriving, diverse metropolis and invigorating to the human with a proud history of innovation, creativity soul’.2 A lofty ambition to transform and being at the forefront of change. London into a more active, better connected, healthier, fairer city. But these are deeply uncertain times. A global climate emergency, air pollution, obesity crises, and a growing divide and disconnect between the richest and poorest There is overwhelming evidence in society create significant challenges. The way people that where radical changes are and goods move around our city can either exacerbate or mitigate these debilitating issues. The evidence shows introduced to streets, and the that Londoners are moving away from a dependence on barriers to walking and cycling are private cars and are beginning to experience the benefits to health, economic vitality and community cohesion that reduced, local communities thrive. this brings. But the ambition and pace of change must accelerate given the scale of the challenges we face. In Waltham Forest, bold changes to the public realm, which prioritise people over motorised vehicles, have Walking and cycling provide simple, immediate solutions increased levels of walking and cycling and led to to improve public health, strengthen community cohesion, an increase in life expectancy of 7-9 months.3 We’ve reduce serious injuries on our roads, ensure public seen increases of up to 200% in people cycling along space is used more efficiently and equitably, reduce the new cycleways,4 demonstrating the appetite of carbon emissions and make mobility more affordable Londoners to take up active travel, where high quality to Londoners.
    [Show full text]
  • ROTHERHITHE 2) (B) Dockmasters Office and Clock Tower (1892) Mid C19 Steam Grain Mill and Warehouse
    Sites of interest (numbered on map overleaf) 26) Old School House (1697) Est. 1613 for education of 8 sons of seamen by Peter Hills. Moved here 1795 1) (A) Deal Porters Statue, by Philip Bews Dockers carrying heavy timber across shoulders 27) Thames Tunnel Mills ROTHERHITHE 2) (B) Dockmasters Office and Clock Tower (1892) Mid C19 steam grain mill and warehouse. Site of steam ferry. Early residential conversion Rotherhithe, originally called Redriff from C13 and frequently 3) King George’s Field (public open space dedicated to King George V (1865-1936) 28)* (R) Mayflower Inn (1780) (formerly Spreadeagle) mentioned by the C17 diarist Samuel Pepys, came from the Site of All Saints Church. Destroyed during WWII List of passengers who sailed on the Mayflower. Licensed to sell US and UK stamps Anglo Saxon for a haven where cattle were landed. It was closely connected to Bermondsey Abbey, as well as having 4) Metropolitan drinking trough (from 1865) 29) (B) (D) Rotherhithe Picture Research Library & Sands Films Studios (Grice's Granary ancient river crossing points associated with shipbuilding and Fountains established by public subscription for humans, then troughs for horses and dogs, 1795) Library includes section on Rotherhithe. Film studio, production and costume making following C19 out breaks of cholera due to contaminated drinking water facilities. Houses one of London's smallest cinemas. www.sandsfilms.co.uk supporting trades (from C17 and probably from the middle ages), and seafaring is recorded in church memorials and 5) (B) Site of St. Olave's Hospital (1870-1985) 30)* (A) (B) (R) (D) Brunel Museum and Cafe (1842) gravestones.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets
    Application by Transport for London for an Order Granting Development Consent for the Silvertown Tunnel (Planning Inspectorate Reference: TR010021) London Borough of Tower Hamlets (Reference no: SILV-396 ) Local Impact Report November 2016 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Local Impact Report The London Borough of Tower Hamlets (LBTH) is one of the three local authorities directly impacted by the proposed Silvertown Tunnel in that it will affect the operation and management of the Blackwall tunnel; of which the northern portal is located within the south east corner of the borough. The council has submitted relevant representations and as an interested party, LBTH is invited to submit a Local Impact Report (LIR) giving details of the likely impact of the proposed development on the authority’s area. This document constitutes LBTH’s (‘the Council’) LIR in relation to the application by Transport for London (TfL) for a Development Consent Order (DCO) for the Silvertown Tunnel (Planning Inspectorate reference TR010021). To inform this document, LBTH has carried out a review of appropriate parts of the Silvertown Tunnel Environmental Statement (ES) and other relevant documentation prepared by TfL that relate to the impact of the DCO proposal on the borough. This LIR considers: the socio-economic characteristics of the borough’s population and workforce the planning and transport policies relevant to the scheme the travel and transport patterns of the borough residents, employers and workforce the impact of the congestion problems on travel and transport in the areas adjacent to the Blackwall Tunnel any possible impacts caused by the proximity of the construction worksites to the borough The LIR comments on the principal issues relevant to LBTH as identified in the Examination Authority (ExA) Rule 6 letter issued on 13 th September 2016 concentrating in particular on transportation and traffic, environmental, socio economic impacts and user charging issues.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.6 Monitoring Strategy TR010021
    7 Volume 7.6 Monitoring Strategy TR010021 APFP Regulation 5(2)(q) Revision 1 Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 October 2016 Silvertown Tunnel Monitoring Strategy v1 Document Reference: 7.6 THIS PAGE HAS INTENTIONALLY BEEN LEFT BLANK Page 2 of 81 Silvertown Tunnel Monitoring Strategy v1 Document Reference: 7.6 Silvertown Tunnel Monitoring Strategy 7.6 Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Document Reference: 7.6 Internal Code: ST150030-PLN-ZZZ-ZZ-DSD-ZZ-0082 Regulation Number: 5(2)(q) Author: Transport for London Rev. Date Approved By Signature Description 0 29/04/2016 David Rowe (TfL For DCO Lead Sponsor) Application 1 15/11/2016 David Rowe (TfL Updated Traffic Lead Sponsor) Monitoring Plan Page 3 of 81 Silvertown Tunnel Monitoring Strategy v1 Document Reference: 7.6 Contents List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................ 7 Glossary of Terms .................................................................................................... 9 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 13 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 17 1.1 Purpose of the Monitoring Strategy ............................................................. 17 1.2 Structure of the Monitoring
    [Show full text]
  • The Effectiveness of Average Speed Cameras in Great Britain
    Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment The Effectiveness of Average Speed Cameras in Great Britain Owen, Ursachi and Allsop September 2016 The Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd is a transport policy and research organisation which explores the economic, mobility, safety and environmental issues relating to roads and their users. The Foundation publishes independent and authoritative research with which it promotes informed debate and advocates policy in the interest of the responsible motorist. RAC Foundation 89–91 Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HS Tel no: 020 7747 3445 www.racfoundation.org Registered Charity No. 1002705 September 2016 © Copyright Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment The Effectiveness of Average Speed Cameras in Great Britain Owen, Ursachi and Allsop September 2016 About the Authors Richard Owen is one of the founding directors of Road Safety Analysis (RSA) and has a strong background in enforcement management having previously held the post of Operations Manager at the Thames Valley Safer Roads Partnership (TVSRP). Richard’s work for TVSRP ranged from national co-ordination and liaison with the Department for Transport, to local oversight of partner budgets and operational delivery. As a director of RSA, Richard has worked on dozens of independent analysis projects covering different road user groups at a national and local level for various clients. George Ursachi is a former academic associate professor and has a strong background in market analysis, research, and project management. He joined RSA, in 2015 and has already been involved in a number of important projects. His background in research synthesis has been deployed in preparing updates on a number of topics for the Road Safety Observatory; and his knowledge of advanced statistical techniques has been implemented in independent evaluations of road safety schemes such as ‘Safe Drive Stay Alive’.
    [Show full text]