Tradition and Transformation of Thai Classical Dance: Nation, (Re) Invention and Pedagogy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Tradition and Transformation of Thai Classical Dance: Nation, (Re) invention and Pedagogy Submitted by Pawinee Boonserm to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Drama In October 2016 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. 1 Abstract This research aims to analyse the role and consequence of state patronage and promotion of Thai classical dance after the revolution of 1932, when the patronage of court dance changed from royal to state support. This research examines connections between the authority of the state, nationalism, Thai identity, and the invention of tradition, by focussing on the reconstruction of Thai classical dance, the promotion of spirituality in the Wai Khru ceremony, and dance pedagogy. This study uses historical research and ethnography through participant-observation, and interviews with senior dance teachers, national artists, masters of the Wai Khru ceremony, and dance artists in the Fine Arts Department, and also draws on the researcher’s personal experience in dance training as a dancer and dance teacher for several years. The thesis offers a detailed analysis of the socio-political context and cultural policy in relation to the establishment of the Fine Arts Department and the Dramatic Arts College; the national institutions whose main roles were to preserve, perform and offer training in traditional dance. After the revolution of 1932, the Fine Arts department played an important role to authorise, preserve, and standardise Thai classical dance. The function and meaning-making processes surrounding dance changed in accordance with the development of Thai identity and cultural policy. During the period 1932-1945, state policy emphasised the homogeneity of ‘Thai-ness’ and civilization, and traditional dance was adapted and combined with classical, folk and western elements. However, after the mid-1940s, the socio-political and cultural policies changed; the state operated the project of cultural revivalism. The court dance style and its rituals were revived with the establishment of a code of ‘classicalism’ which became the central aesthetic identification of Thai identity. The newly-coined classicalism has become the standard, and has been passed on to succeeding generations in the new educational system. These new invented traditions were preserved as if they were sacred, a practice which continues to the present. 2 Acknowledgements A great number of people have helped and supported me throughout the process of writing this thesis. To all of them I want to express my deep gratitude: Thammasat University for funding and other forms of support which have allowed me to complete this thesis, and the University of Exeter. Thoughout my study at Exeter, I have been fortunate to have Professor Jane Milling as my supervisor. Her constant guidance, and her comments and suggestions in every supervision have been invaluable. Professor Milling has made it possible for me to finish this thesis. I am also grateful for the beneficial comments of my second supervisor, Professor Jerri Daboo who provided encouragement throughout the PhD process. My sincere gratitude to Dr.Kerrie Schaefer and Dr.Ashley Thorpe - my viva examiners, for their valuable comments and suggestions that help me to improve the quality of my thesis. I would also like to thank those who have helped me in the earlier stages of my thesis. I am deeply indebted to my three academic mentors, Associate Prof. Chanthana Iamsakul, Arjan Suthida Kalayanarooj and Dr. Pornchai Sriprapai, for their generous encouragement. I particularly indebted to all of my interviewees for sparing their precious time for interviews. Among the many national artists and senior dance masters who generously gave me their time, I am especially grateful to Arjan Noppharat Wangnaitham, Arjan Suwannee Chalanukhro, Arjan Rachana Pungprayong, Arjan Boonnak Tantranon, Arjan Nongyua Aumrungpongwattana, and Arjan Sakul Muengsakorn. At the National Conservatory in Bangkok, I received considerable support from the Head of Bunditpatanasilpa Institute, Dr. Chanai Vannalee, Assistant Prof. Kwanjai Kongthaworn, Asst. Prof. Dr. Jintana Saitongkum and teachers from the College of Dramatic Arts: Arjan Chalemchai Piromrak, Arjan Pramjai Pengsuk, Arjan Achara, Arjan Thanyawadee. I am 3 indebted to Arjan Sombati Kaewsujarit, Dr.Chulachart Aranyanak, Captain Dr. Akarin Pongpandecha, Tada Vithauapul, Thakoon Samranpong, Dr. Kerdsiri Noknoi for sharing their knowledge of the Wai Khru ceremony and the Ong Phra Phirap dance and dance artists in the Office of Performing Arts such as Dr. Pairoj Thongkumsuk, Somrat Thongtae, and Dr. Treeradach Klinchan. The completion of this thesis could not have been possible without the companionship and help of my friends through the various stages of this project: Assistant Prof. Dr. Sukanya, Dr.Phakamas, Dr. Kailas, Dr. Alongkorn, and Dr.Valulee for sharing their research, and knowledge of cultural studies and Thai theatre. Many thanks to Arjan Siriphan, Arjan Asdavuth, Nareerat, Julsub, Watcharawan, Pimrat, Aekanan, Nathaya, Maneerat, Vorakrit, Prapasri, Worakamon, Katsamaporn, Sirirak, Jantima, Chalersak, Natthakan, Nantida, and Rattasard who help me with archival work in Thailand. I am greatly appreciative of my editor, English teachers in INTO tutorials, Suthee, Aqeel, Faustina, and am especially grateful to Sharanya who helped me with proofing. Special acknowledgements are due to my colleagues and staff at the Faculty of Fine and Applied Arts at Thammasat University who have always supported me. Special thanks to all my friends both in Thailand and in Exeter, for their support and encouragement during difficult times: Sonna, Nora, Sharanya, Evelyn, Swati, Sabina, P’thing, Pol, Gough, Fon, Lin, Poppy, Joyce, Ohm, Kim, Pom, Pat, Bua, Ome, Dao,Ta, P’Kob, Lee, Num, Off, Bom, Tew and Faulkners family. A special note of thanks to my dear host family, who throughout the long years of my staying in UK have provides me with a sense of home and language: Lorraine and Rob. Last but not least, I thank my beloved family in Thailand; my mother and father, Yuawapa and Vichit; my sister, Chonlada; my brother, Jakaphan; my sister-in-law, Monlarat, and all my relatives who are always with me, encouraging me to finish this thesis. To those are present but remain unnamed in this thesis, my thanks are due to them too. 4 Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... 3 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ 5 List of Figures ................................................................................................................. 8 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 10 Overview and Research Questions........................................................................ 12 Critical Framework and Review Literature........................................................... 20 Dance, Nationalism and Identity ................................................................. 20 Some Studies on Thai Classical Dance and Thai Theatre ........................... 24 Thai-ness and Thai Identity ......................................................................... 29 Some Studies in Spirituality in Dance and the Wai Khru Ceremony .......... 31 State and Dance Education .......................................................................... 32 Research Methodology.......................................................................................... 33 Organisation of the Dissertation............................................................................ 36 Chapter 1 ....................................................................................................................... 40 Nationalism, Cultural Policy and Traditional Dance: 1932-1945 ............................ 40 Thailand from Absolute Monarchy to Democracy ............................................... 41 Classical Dance Patronage before the Revolution ................................................ 43 Changes in Organisation of Court Dance ............................................................. 47 New Organisation of Court Dance: The Fine Arts Department .................. 48 The Establishment of the Academy of Dance and Music............................ 51 Productions of the Fine Arts Department: The Hybrid Dance Drama to Propagate Thai Nationalism ......................................................................................... 54 The Transformation of the Popular Play to a New Theatrical Genre .......... 56 The new Thai Theatrical Genre: Luang Wichit Plays ................................. 60 Dance Choreography in Productions of Wichit’s Plays .............................. 61 Impact of Social Change on Court Dance: Bridge Elite and Ordinary Taste ....... 63