DOCSLIB.ORG

Hellenic Chamber of Shipping

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hellenic Chamber of Shipping Hellenic Chamber of Shipping MARITIME LAW REGULATIONS IN UKRAINE EVGENIY SUKACHEV Board Member Ukrainian Maritime Bar Association 24/10/2019 SHIPPING CAPITAL OF UKRAINE ODESSA IS THE THIRD-LARGEST CITY IN UKRAINE SHIPPING CAPITAL OF UKRAINE 8 INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT CORRIDORS TOTAL CAPACITY - 313, 3 MILLION TONS CARGOES 2/28 KEY FACTS ABOUT ODESSA REGION ODESSA REGION - 2ND LARGEST PORT POTENTIAL AMONG THE BLACK AND AZOV SEAS 7 FROM 13 TRADE PORTS - IN ODESSA REGION 11 RIVER PORTS TO HANDLE UP TO 100 MT OF CARGO ANNUALLY IN 2018 UKRAINE REGISTERED THE HIGHEST GROWTH IN THE CONTAINER TURNOVER VOLUMES AMONG THE BLACK AND AZOV SEAS 3/28 TOTAL CAPACITY - 313, 3 MT CARGOES Sea Port of Chornomorsk 17% Sea Trade Port Yuzhny 37.8% Nikolaev sea port 23.2% Port of Odessa 22% 4/28 CARGO STATISTICS & TRENDS IN 2019 Transit 6.9% EXPORT: 55.464 MT Import IMPORT: 10.961 MT 15.4% TRANSIT: 4.941 MT Export 77.7% 5/28 CARGO STATISTICS & TRENDS IN 2019 COAL OIL OIL: 3.167 MT 4.3% 6.6% CHEMICAL PETROLEUM: 538.78 THOUSAND TONS 3% CHEMICAL CARGO: 1.422 MT GRAIN LOADS: 24.5 MT ORE CARGO: 16.491 MT ORE COAL: 2.076 MT 34.2% GRAIN 50.8% 6/28 PORTS OF UKRAINE SEA - 13 RIVER - 11 7/28 OPERATORS IN UKRAINE PORTS 8/28 STATE AND PRIVATE STEVEDORES 103 PRIVATE PORT OPERATORS 13 STATE PORT OPERATORS 9/28 UKRAINIAN INLAND WATERWAYS 3 NAVIGABLE RIVERS, TWO OF WHICH ARE IN TOP-5 LARGEST RIVERS OF EUROPE 16 RIVER PORTS AND TERMINALS 60 MT OF CAPACITY PER YEAR THE LAW “ON INLAND WATERWAYS OF UKRAINE” MUST BE ADOPTED NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1 OF THIS YEAR 10/28 MARITIME AUTHORITY MINISTRY OF INFRASTRUCTURE OF UKRAINE UKRAINIAN SEA PORTS AUTHORITY (USPA) STATE SERVICE FOR MARITIME AND RIVER TRANSPORT 11/28 PSC THE MARITIME ADMINISTRATION IS AN EXECUTIVE BODY WHOSE ACTIVITIES ARE DIRECTED AND COORDINATED BY THE GOVERNMENT THROUGH THE MINISTER OF INFRASTRUCTURE. THE DEPARTMENT IMPLEMENTS STATE POLICY IN THE FIELDS OF SEA AND RIVER TRANSPORT, MERCHANT SHIPPING, SHIPPING ON INLAND WATERWAYS 12/28 ECOLOGICAL CONTROL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (UKRAINIAN LEGISLATION) WHICH AUTHORITY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING OF SHIPS? INSPECTION'S ACTIONS 13/28 MARITIME REGULATION ON JULY 17, 2019, THE GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE HAS ADOPTED PROCEDURE FOR JOINT ACTIVITIES BETWEEN THE UKRAINIAN SEA PORTS AUTHORITY AND THE STATE ECOLOGICAL INSPECTION OF UKRAINE ON AUGUST 21, 2019, THE GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE HAS ADOPTED A RESOLUTION “ON APPROVAL OF THE PROCEDURE OF INSPECTION OF SHIPS, SAMPLING AND WATER ANALYSIS” 14/28 ECOLOGICAL CONTROL TAKING OF SAMPLES SHOULD BE CONDUCTED BY THE ECOLOGICAL INSPECTORATE IN THE PRESENCE OF THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MARITIME ADMINISTRATION, THE MASTER OF THE VESSEL AND THE MARITIME AGENT (UPON HIS CONSENT). THEREFORE ECOLOGICAL INSPECTORS CAN NO LONGER ATTEND UNACCOMPANIED. THE ONBOARD SAMPLING LOCATION SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MARITIME ADMINISTRATION IN AGREEMENT WITH THE ECOLOGICAL INSPECTOR AND THE MASTER. 15/28 DETENTION STATISTICS 2019 Bilhorod-Dnistrovsky Seaport 6.3% Sea Trade Port Yuzhny Sea Port of Chornomorsk 37.5% 28.1% Port of Kherson Nikolaev sea port 3.1% Port of Odessa 9.4% 15.6% 16/28 SANCTION RISKS SANCTIONS FUNCTION ON THE TERRITORY OF UKRAINE UNDER THE REGULATION OF THE UKRAINIAN LAW “ON SANCTIONS”, THAT WAS ENACTED IN 2014 FULL LIST OF THE UKRAINIAN SANCTIONS IS PRESENTED ON THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENSE COUNCIL OF UKRAINE BIMCO CLAUSE IS A “MUST-HAVE” FOR ANY CHARTER PARTY 17/28 HOW DOES SANCTION GET INTO FORCE? NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENSE COUNCIL OF UKRAINE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE SANCTIONS ARE ACTIVE 18/28 SANCTION RISKS IN AUGUST, 2018 ONE TANKER ENTERED UKRAINIAN PORT DECREE TO PROHIBIT THE VESSEL TO LEAVE PORT FOR 3 DAYS THE VESSEL WAS INCLUDED IN THE UKRAINIAN SANCTIONS LIST 19/28 SHIP ARREST UKRAINE RATIFIED THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES RELATING TO THE ARREST OF SEA-GOING SHIPS OF 1952 INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ARREST OF SHIPS OF 1999 - NOT RATIFIED ARTICLE 42 OF THE MERCHANT SHIPPING CODE OF UKRAINE STIPULATES MEANING OF THE MARITIME CLAIM 20/28 ARREST PROCEDURE THE GENERAL PRACTICE USED FOR SHIP ARRESTS HAS BECOME MORE STABLE. CHANGES TO THE PROCEDURAL LEGISLATION HAVE SPED UP THE SHIP ARREST PROCEDURE AT THE TIME OF APPLYING FOR REGISTRATION, THE VESSEL MAY BE OUTSIDE UKRAINIAN TERRITORY APPLICATION FOR ARREST IN RESPECT OF A MARITIME CLAIM WILL BE ADJUDGED IN 2 DAYS ARREST OF A SISTER SHIP IS POSSIBLE IN UKRAINE 21/28 SHIP ARREST APPLICATION THE APPLICATION FOR ARREST: (I) DESCRIPTION OF A PROVEN MARITIME CLAIM; (II) INFORMATION THAT THE CLAIM COMMENSURATE WITH THE VALUE OF THE VESSEL THAT WILL BE ARRESTED; (III) GROUNDS OF THE VESSEL ARREST NECESSITY; (IV) EVIDENCE THAT THE VESSEL IS BERTHED OR REGISTERED IN UKRAINE; (V) EVIDENCE THAT THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MARITIME CLAIM OWNS OR MANAGES THE VESSEL. 22/28 RELEASE A SHIP FROM ARREST 1.COURT, WHICH ARRESTED A SHIP MAY LIFT THE ARREST 1.COURT OF APPEALS CAN CANCEL AN ORDER OF ARREST THAT WAS ISSUED BY A COURT OF THE FIRST INSTANCE 23/28 TYPE OF SECURITY BANK GUARANTEE LETTER OF INDEMNITY 24/28 CASE STUDY 1.INSTRUCTIONS AND DOCUMENTS FROM THE CLIENT 2.TRANSLATION OF DOCUMENTS AND APPLICATION 3.WITHIN 14 HOURS AFTER THE APPLICATION - COURT'S DECISION 4.IN 4 HOURS - THE DECISION HAVE BEEN FILED TO THE PORT 5.THE VESSEL WAS ARRESTED ON THURSDAY AT 11 AM 6.THE CLIENT RECEIVED THE AMOUNT OF DEBT ON TUESDAY AT 2 PM 7.ON TUESDAY AT 8 AM - THE SHIP LEFT THE PORT THE VESSEL WAS NOT FILED AT THE PORT OF LOADING 25/28 CASE STUDY WRONG ON THURSDAY AT 11 PM - COURT DECISION FROM A CLIENT ON FRIDAY AT 10 AM - CASE MATERIALS PREPARED AN APPLICATION ON MONDAY AT 9:10 AM - APPLICATION WAS BROUGHT COURT DECISION ON TUESDAY AT 11 AM - THE ARREST WAS CANCELED AT 4 PM - THE SHIP LEFT THE PORT CHARTER DEBT 26/28 WHAT IS IMO 2020? LOW SULPHUR FUEL OIL (0.5% M/M SULPHUR CONTENT) HIGH SULPHUR FUEL OIL (3.5% M/M SULPHUR CONTENT) LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS (LNG) 0,5 % 0, 3 % LNG 27/28 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION EVGENIY SUKACHEV Board Member Ukrainian Maritime Bar Association [email protected] .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ukrainian and Russian Waterways and the Development of European Transport Corridors
    European Transport \ Trasporti Europei n. 30 (2005): 14-36 Ukrainian and Russian waterways and the development of European transport corridors Michael Doubrovsky1∗ 1Odessa National Maritime University, Odessa, Ukraine Abstract Four of the nine international transport corridors pass through the territory of Ukraine: №3, №5, №7, and №9. In recent years Ukraine conducted an active policy supporting the European initiatives on the international transport corridors and offered variants of corridors to the European community. In the field of a water transport it is planned to carry out the construction of new and reconstruction of existing infrastructure (regarding corridors № 9; TRACECA; Baltic - Black Sea) in the main Ukrainian ports. The paper considers the situation in the Ukrainian waterways as a part of the international transport corridors. It presents an analysis of the existing situation and some planning measures. In order to optimize and rationally development the inland waterways and seaports of the Black Sea – Azov Sea region it is necessary to speed up the working out and official approval of the regional transport ways network. Regarding Ukrainian seaports this task is carried out within the framework of program TRACECA, and also by Steering Committee of Black Sea PETRA and working group on transport of the Organization of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation. To connect the new members countries of EU two approaches are considered: (1) the use of the Danube River due to restoration of navigation in its Ukrainian part, providing an exit to the Black Sea; (2) the creation of new inland water-transport links providing a more rational and uniform distribution of freight traffics from the Central and Northern Europe (using the third largest river in Europe - Dnepr River running into the Black Sea).
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Grain Ports Outlook - 2018 the History of Grain Is the History of Odessa 2018- Population Sensus 1892
    Ukraine grain ports outlook - 2018 The history of grain is the history of Odessa 2018- Population sensus 1892 1794-1917 1991- 1917 1917 1918-1920 1941-1944 1918 1918-1920 1920-1991 1794-2018 Humble beginnings – but not much change Comparison of cost – America vs Ukraine 1880 America - Ukraine River transport 7 22 Railroad 5 31 Transshipment 3 40 ‘’Kopek’’ per 360 pounds The port of Odessa is of particular disadvantage since only one railway line ties to the interior 1871 – 71% of grain reach Odessa by rail ‘’French Consul Odessa 1907’’ Grain export 1911 Odessa second rail line opens 1913 Odessa-Bakhmach Odessa – 1.6 mill tons Nikolaev – 1.5 mill tons Odessa is the only deep sea port and the other ports Nikolaev and Kherson have Kherson – 1 mill tons To send their grain in barges to Ochakov and Odessa to be loaded onto vessel ‘’United States Consul Odessa 1913’’ 1890 – First Grain Elevator is built 1860 Dreyfuss establish branch in Odessa Inland transport was (still is) a major problem – the cost of There is no roads outside Odessa transporting grain from suburbs of Odessa to port ‘’Italian 1905’’ was same as from Chicago to New York 1 silver penny sterling = 32 wheat grains ‘’French Consul Odessa 1879’’ 1 Sumerian shekel = weight of 180 wheat grains 1 Inch = 3 medium sized barley corns places end to end (2.54 cm) Challenges in 19th Century and today • Lack of Grain Quality control and standards • Poor infrastructure – roads and rail • High inland cost on railroad and lack of capacity • Transshipment rates high versus elsewhere • Buying
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiology of Parkinson's Disease in the Southern Ukraine
    — !!!cifra_MNJ_№5_(tom16)_2020 01.07. Белоусова 07.07.Евдокимова ОРИГІНАЛЬНІ ДОСЛІДЖЕННЯ /ORIGINAL RESEARCHES/ UDC 616.858-036.22 DOI: 10.22141/2224-0713.16.5.2020.209248 I.V. Hubetova Odessa Regional Clinical Hospital, Odesa, Ukraine Odessa National Medical University, Odesa, Ukraine Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease in the Southern Ukraine Abstract. Background. Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a slowly progressing neurodegenerative disease with accumulation of alpha-synuclein and the formation of Lewy bodies inside nerve cells. The prevalence of PD ranges from 100 to 200 cases per 100,000 population. However, in the Ukrainian reality, many cases of the disease remain undiagnosed, which affects the statistical indicators of incidence and prevalence. The purpose of the study is to compare PD epidemiological indices in the Southern Ukraine with all-Ukrainian rates. Material and methods. Statistical data of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, public health departments of Odesa, Mykolaiv and Kherson regions for 2015–2017 were analyzed. There were used the methods of descriptive statistics and analysis of variance. Results. Average prevalence of PD in Ukraine is 67.5 per 100,000 population — it is close to the Eastern European rate. The highest prevalence was registered in Lviv (142.5 per 100,000), Vinnytsia (135.9 per 100,000), Cherkasy (108.6 per 100,000) and Kyiv (107.1 per 100,000) regions. The lowest rates were in Luhansk (37.9 per 100,000), Kyrovohrad (42.5 per 100,000), Chernivtsi (49.0 per 100,000) and Ternopil (49.6 per 100,000) regions. In the Southern Ukraine, the highest prevalence of PD was found in Mykolaiv region.
    [Show full text]
  • For Classification and Construction of Ships (Rccs)
    RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF SHIPS (RCCS) Part 0 CLASSIFICATION 4 RCCS. Part 0 “Classification” 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.1 The present Part of the Rules for the materials for the ships except for small craft Classification and Construction of Inland and used for non-for-profit purposes. The re- Combined (River-Sea) Navigation Ships (here quirements of the present Rules are applicable and in all other Parts — Rules) defines the to passenger ships, tankers, pushboats, tug- basic terms and definitions applicable for all boats, ice breakers and industrial ships of Parts of the Rules, general procedure of ship‘s overall length less than 20 m. class adjudication and composing of class The requirements of the present Rules are formula, as well as contains information on not applicable to small craft, pleasure ships, the documents issued by Russian River Regis- sports sailing ships, military and border- ter (hereinafter — River Register) and on the security ships, ships with nuclear power units, areas and seasons of operation of the ships floating drill rigs and other floating facilities. with the River Register class. However, the River Register develops and 1.2 When performing its classification and issues corresponding regulations and other survey activities the River Register is governed standards being part of the Rules for particu- by the requirements of applicable interna- lar types of ships (small craft used for com- tional agreements of Russian Federation, mercial purposes, pleasure and sports sailing Regulations on Classification and Survey of ships, ekranoplans etc.) and other floating Ships, as well as the Rules specified in Clause facilities (pontoon bridges etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Projects
    REFERENCE PROJECTS Project Locations around the World © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH On the following pages, you will find a comprehensive list of the projects HPC has conducted ever since our foundation in 1976. 22/07/2021 HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH 1/94 REFERENCE PROJECTS Project Title Client, Location Start Date Construction Supervision for Six Automated Victoria International Container Terminal 2021 Container Carriers in Melbourne, Australia Ltd. PR-3241/336003 Melbourne; Australia Application for Funding of 5G Campus HHLA Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG 2021 Network Hamburg; Germany PR-3240/331014 Simulation Analysis Study for CTA with Fully HHLA Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG 2021 Automated Truck Handover Hamburg; Germany PR-3238/331013 Initial Market Study for a New "Condition EMG Automation GmbH 2021 Monitoring & Predictive Maintenance" Wenden; Germany PR-3239/332005 Business Model Support with Funding Applications for the B- HHLA Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG 2021 AGV System at Container Terminal Hamburg; Germany PR-3233/331011 Burchardkai HPC Secondment BHP Safe Mooring IPS Aurecon Australasia Pty Ltd 2021 Melbourne; Australia PR-3236/336002 Brazil, Sagres Implementation of OHS Sagres Operacoes Portuarias Ltda 2021 Recommendations Cidade Nova Rio Grande RS; Brazil PR-3234/334002 IT Management Support for a German CHI Deutschland Cargo Handling GmbH 2021 Cargo Handling Company Frankfurt/Main; Germany PR-3235/332004 PANG Study on the Ability of Ports on the Puerto Angamos 2021 Western Coast of Latin America to Handle
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic and Institutional Analysis of Multi-Port Gateway Regions in the Black Sea Basin
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Open Marine Archive JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS AND TRADE 3 Volume 12, Number 2, August 2014, pp.3~35 An Economic and Institutional Analysis of Multi-Port Gateway Regions in the Black Sea Basin Kateryna Grushevska*, Theo Notteboom** _________________________________________________________________________ Abstract The concept of ‘multi-port gateway region’ has been introduced by Notteboom (2010) and has been applied to important seaport markets such as Europe and Asia. However, the dynamics and port development patterns in secondary multi-port gateway regions, such as the Black Sea region, have received far less attention in academic literature. An empirical application of established spatial and functional development models to such secondary port regions might substantiate the external validity of these models as these ports operate in a different spatial, economic and institutional environment. The aim of the paper is to characterize the spatial dynamics of container ports of the Black Sea multi-port gateway regions by testing the validity of established spatial models on port system development. Furthermore, the expected future evolution path for port hierarchy in the Black Sea basin is discussed. By doing so, the paper assesses to what extent the Black Sea port region is following an ‘expected’ development path as portrayed in a number of port system development models, or alternatively, can be characterized as an atypical port system following its own development logic. Key Words : Black Sea, Containers, Gateway, Hinterland, Port system development, Terminal. JEL classification : R40 & R49 * PhD Researcher, ITMMA – University of Antwerp, Kipdorp 59, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium E-mail: [email protected] ** (corresponding author) President and Professor, ITMMA – University of Antwerp, Kipdorp 59, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Memorandum Olvia Port Concession Project
    Information Memorandum Olvia Port Concession Project September 2018 1 Table of Contents Chapter 1. General information and a brief summary of the Project 6 1.1 Introduction 6 1.1.1 Outline of the Information Memorandum 8 Chapter 2. Overview of the market environment 9 2.1 Summary 9 2.2 Part A: Ukrainian Port Sector Analysis 9 2.2.1 Historical analysis of the cargo flow of the port industry in Ukraine 9 2.2.2 National Demand and Capacity Projections Most Promising Cargo Commodities 21 2.2.3 Supply Chain Cost Analysis 40 2.3 Part B: SE SC Olvia Projections 54 2.3.1 Introduction 55 2.3.2 Grain Projections 55 2.3.3 Ferrous Metals Projections 61 2.3.4 “Other” Cargoes Projections 66 2.3.5 Conclusions Demand Projections Port of Olvia 71 2.4 Part C: Market Sounding - Potential Investors 73 2.4.1 Introduction 73 2.4.2 Context 73 2.4.3 Main outcomes of the market sounding meetings 75 Chapter 3. Legal aspects of the Project 76 3.1 Overview of laws, decrees, regulations and other legal instruments that are related to the Project 76 3.1.1 Seaport industry laws and regulations 76 3.1.1 PPP/concession laws and regulations 78 3.1.3 Dedicated laws/regulations governing specific aspects/relations under the Projects 81 3.1.4 Overview of concession project flow 83 3.2 The selection of the PPP model, its effectiveness from the legal standpoint 87 3.2.1 Concession 87 3.3 Concession object 90 3.3.1 Concession object under Ukrainian law 90 3.3.2 Comments on land issues 93 3.4 Comments on permit documents and approvals that may be required to implement the Projects 97 3.4.1 Permit documents and approvals that may need to be "transferred" to investors 98 3.4.2 Permit documents and approvals that may need to be received by private partners due to their investment activities and other Project-specific operations 107 3.5 Comments on insurance terms for the Projects 110 3.5.1 Key types of insurance relevant for implementation of the Projects 110 Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Prognostication and Planning of Economic Development: Microeconomic and Macroeconomic Levels
    ALEKSANDRAS STULGINSKIS UNIVERSITY BUSINESS AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE PROGNOSTICATION AND PLANNING OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: MICROECONOMIC AND MACROECONOMIC LEVELS Volume 1 Multi-authored monograph edited by J. Žukovskis, K. Shaposhnykov Kaunas, Lithuania 2019 UDC 340.34+338.2 P93 Recommended for publication by the Academic Council of Aleksandras Stulginskis University Recommended for publication by the Academic Council of SSI “Institute for the Education Content Modernization” of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (Minutes No. 10 on 18.12.2019) Reviewers: Paweł Dziekański – Doctor of Economic Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Poland. Natia Gogolauri – Professor, Dr. of Economics, Head of Quality Assurance, New Higher Education Institute (NEWUNI), Georgia. Editorial Board of the multi-authored monograph: Jan Žukovskis – Associate Professor, Dr. of Economics, Head of Business and Rural Development Management Institute, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Kaunas, Lithuania. Andrzej Pawlik – Dr. hab., Professor Head of the Institute for Entrepreneurship and Innovation, State University of Jan Kochanowski, Poland. Olga Chwiej – Associate Professor, Dr. of Economics, freelancer scientist, Poland. Kostiantyn Shaposhnykov – Professor, Dr. of Economics, Head of Black Sea Research Institute of Economy and Innovation, Ukraine. Vilma Atkociuniene – Professor, Dr. of Economics, Business and Rural Development Management Institute, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Kaunas, Lithuania. Martina Diesener –
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Geology, Geography And
    ISSN 2617-2909 (print) Journal of Geology, ISSN 2617-2119 (online) Geography and Journ. Geol. Geograph. Geoecology Geology, 28(4), 747–756. Journal home page: geology-dnu-dp.ua doi: 10.15421/111970 Vitaliy A. Sych, Victoria V. Yavorska, Igor V. Hevko, Katherine V. Kolomiyets, Inna M. Shorobura Journ. Geol. Geograph. Geoecology, 28(4), 747–756. Features of territorial organization of population resettlement of the coastal strip of the Ukrainian Black Sea Region Vitaliy A. Sych1 , Victoria V. Yavorska1, Igor V. Hevko2, Katherine V. Kolomiyets1, Inna M. Shorobura3 1Odesa I .I. Mechnykov National University, Odesa, Ukraine, [email protected] 2Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, Ukraine 3Khmelnytskyi Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy, Ukraine Received: 07.05.2019 Abstract. This article deals with the features of population settlement within the Ukrainian Received in revised form: 21.05.2019 Black Sea region and its coastal zone. It is emphasized that the problems of coastal Accepted: 17.11.2019 resettlement, the factors that determine it, are highlighted in the works of foreign and Ukrainian scientists. The purpose of the work is to find out the features of the population settlement in the region of the Ukrainian Black Sea region. In the studied region, due to the territorial differentiation of economic activity, change in the intensity of economic use of the territory and the population density can be distinguished by the coastal, middle and peripheral economic zones. It was established that the supporting framework of urban settlement in the Ukrainian Black Sea region is characterized by a fairly sparse network, and the settlement process itself is in many respects still in the stage of formation, incompleteness.
    [Show full text]
  • UKRAINE - April 2018
    UKRAINE - April 2018 BLACK AND AZOV SEAS WORKING GROUP (BASWG) STATE HYDROGRAPHIC SERVICE OF UKRAINE NATIONAL REPORT OF UKRAINE 14th Meeting of the Black and Azov Seas Working Group (BASWG14) 1 UKRAINE - April 2018 NATIONAL REPORT OF UKRAINE to the 14th Meeting of the Black and Azov Seas Working Group (BASWG) 1. Hydrographic Office/Service a. General The State Hydrographic Service of Ukraine (SHSU) is a national hydrographic office established within the framework of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine. The main tasks of the SHSU are as follows: − Fulfillment of international commitments of Ukraine pertaining to the safety of navigation, in particular hydrographic surveying of oceans and seas in accordance with the IHO standards, provision of the seas and inland waterways within zone of responsibility of Ukraine with AtoNs, their maintenance and ensuring of continuous operation in conformity with the IALA requirements; − Compilation and distribution of nautical and pilot inland charts, Sailing Directions, Notices to Mariners, other nautical publications; − Acting as a national navigational warnings coordinator and a national NAVTEX coordinator in Ukraine; − Development of the AtoN system by means of implementation of new methods, techniques and technologies in the fields of navigation, hydrography and cartography; − Lighthouses renovation involving the energy-saving technologies (solar batteries, wind power stations, LEDs etc.), modernization of floating AtoNs through use of plastics, flasher mechanisms with LED modules and implementation of the Automatic Identification System (AIS); − development and maintenance of the uniform system of hydrographic support of navigation in the seas and inland waterways of Ukraine. Due to the Russian Federation’s occupation and annexation of the part of Ukrainian territory, from March 2014 the SHSU doesn’t have access to Ukraine’s inland waters and territorial sea in the area of Crimean Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • SGGEE Ukrainian Gazetteer 201908 Other.Xlsx
    SGGEE Ukrainian gazetteer other oblasts © 2019 Dr. Frank Stewner Page 1 of 37 27.08.2021 Menno Location according to the SGGEE guideline of October 2013 North East Russian name old Name today Abai-Kutschuk (SE in Slavne), Rozdolne, Crimea, Ukraine 454300 331430 Абаи-Кучук Славне Abakly (lost), Pervomaiske, Crimea, Ukraine 454703 340700 Абаклы - Ablesch/Deutsch Ablesch (Prudy), Sovjetskyi, Crimea, Ukraine 451420 344205 Аблеш Пруди Abuslar (Vodopiyne), Saky, Crimea, Ukraine 451837 334838 Абузлар Водопійне Adamsfeld/Dsheljal (Sjeverne), Rozdolne, Crimea, Ukraine 452742 333421 Джелял Сєверне m Adelsheim (Novopetrivka), Zaporizhzhia, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine 480506 345814 Вольный Новопетрівка Adshiaska (Rybakivka), Mykolaiv, Mykolaiv, Ukraine 463737 312229 Аджияск Рибаківка Adshiketsch (Kharytonivka), Simferopol, Crimea, Ukraine 451226 340853 Аджикечь Харитонівка m Adshi-Mambet (lost), Krasnohvardiiske, Crimea, Ukraine 452227 341100 Аджи-мамбет - Adyk (lost), Leninske, Crimea, Ukraine 451200 354715 Адык - Afrikanowka/Schweigert (N of Afrykanivka), Lozivskyi, Kharkiv, Ukraine 485410 364729 Африкановка/Швейкерт Африканівка Agaj (Chekhove), Rozdolne, Crimea, Ukraine 453306 332446 Агай Чехове Agjar-Dsheren (Kotelnykove), Krasnohvardiiske, Crimea, Ukraine 452154 340202 Агьяр-Джерень Котелникове Aitugan-Deutsch (Polohy), Krasnohvardiiske, Crimea, Ukraine 451426 342338 Айтуган Немецкий Пологи Ajkaul (lost), Pervomaiske, Crimea, Ukraine 453444 334311 Айкаул - Akkerman (Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi), Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi, Odesa, Ukraine 461117 302039 Белгород-Днестровский
    [Show full text]
  • PRELIMINARY TRADE CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT Moldova Structural Reform
    GRAIN AND OIL TERMINALS AT GIURGIULESTI INTERNATIONAL FREE PORT PHOTO BY KRISTEN HARTPENCE FOR USAID PRELIMINARY TRADE CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT Moldova Structural Reform DISCLAIMER This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Nathan Associates Inc. and its subcontractors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION TO TRADE CORRIDORS AND TRADE CORRIDOR ASSESSMENTS 1 INTRODUCTION TO TRADE CORRIDORS 1 ASSESSING TRADE CORRIDOR PERFORMANCE 0 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT 2 2. CONTEXT OF MOLDOVA’S TRADE CORRIDORS 4 MOLDOVA’S TRADE COMPOSITION 4 OVERVIEW OF MOLDOVA’S TRADE CORRIDORS 8 MOLDOVA’S TRADE CORRIDOR INFRASTRUCTURE, SERVICES AND REGULATIONS 13 3. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF MOLDOVA’S TRADE CORRIDORS 29 OVERVIEW OF PERFORMANCE 29 KEY CHALLENGES AND POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES 33 4. FULL TCA METHODOLOGY 36 APPROACH 36 METHODOLOGY 39 FIGURES Figure 1. Typical Logistics Chain ............................................................................................................................. 1 Figure 2. Map of Moldova’s Trade Corridors ...................................................................................................... 2 Figure 3. Moldova’s Import Values by Region, USD, 2010-2016 .................................................................... 5 Figure 4. Structure of Moldova’s Imports, 2016 ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]