DOCSLIB.ORG

An Inventory of Its Dairy Trade Hearing and Docket Files

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Inventory of Its Dairy Trade Hearing and Docket Files MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Minnesota State Archives AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT An Inventory of Its Dairy Trade Hearing and Docket Files OVERVIEW OF THE RECORDS Agency: Minnesota. Dept. of Agriculture. Series Title: Dairy trade hearing and docket files. Dates: [ca. 1957] – 1976 (bulk 1957-1976). Abstract: Hearing and docket files documenting the department’s role in regulating unfair trade practices in the dairy products industry, particularly the under pricing of products. Quantity: 12.1 cu. ft. (11 boxes and 2 partial boxes). Location: See Detailed Description section for box locations. SCOPE AND CONTENTS OF THE RECORDS In 1961, the administration of the Dairy Industry Unfair Trade Practices Act of 1957 was transferred from the Department of Business Development to the Agriculture Department. The purpose of the law was to stabilize prices on selected dairy products and to prevent unfair trade practices in marketing those products. It required manufacturers, wholesalers, and distributors of milk and selected dairy products to file schedules of prices at which sales would be made wholesale to retailers and governed unfair trade practices, particularly the under pricing of products. The hearings files (ca. 1960s-1976, bulk 1957-1961) consist mainly of hearing transcripts, most often with company employees; while the docket files (ca. 1957-1976) contain transcripts, assorted legal documents, and facilitative correspondence. Mainly dealing with under pricing claims, the files cover wholesalers and retailers statewide and a few in neighboring states. ARRANGEMENT OF THE RECORDS Arranged in two series: a set of numerical hearings files (ca. 1960s – 1964) and a set of docket files (ca. 1957-1976). The latter is divided into alphabetical (ca. 1957-1976) and numerical (1961-1976) subsets. findaids\state\agric014.inv AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT. Dairy trade hearing and docket files. p. 2 INDEX TERMS This collection is indexed under the following headings in the catalog of the Minnesota Historical Society. Researchers desiring materials about related topics, persons or places should search the catalog using these headings. Topics: Competition, Unfair—Minnesota. Dairy laws—Minnesota. Dairy products industry—Minnesota—State supervision. Dairy products—Minnesota—Marketing. Enforcing. Grocery trade—Law and legislation—Minnesota. Milk trade—Minnesota—State supervision. Regulating. Trade regulation—Minnesota. Organizations: Minnesota. Dept. of Agriculture. Dairy Trade Section. Minnesota. Dept. of Agriculture. Dairy Unfair Practices Section. Types of Documents: Dockets. Legal documents. Transcripts. Titles: Minnesota. Dairy Industry Unfair Trade Practices Act. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Preferred Citation: [Indicate the cited item and folder title here]. Minnesota. Dept. of Agriculture. Dairy Trade Hearing and Docket Files. Minnesota Historical Society. State Archives. See the Chicago Manual of Style for additional examples. Accession Information: Accession number(s): 2005-19 Processing Information: Processed by: Debbie Sher, October 2004 MnPALS ID No.: 3654903 findaids\state\agric014.inv AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT. Dairy trade hearing and docket files. p. 3 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE COLLECTION Note to Researchers: To request materials, please note both the location and box numbers shown below. All locations listed are in Minnesota unless otherwise noted. Location Box 133.B.9.12F 1 Index to dairy trade hearings, Nos. 1-98, 1961-1964; [partial list of complaints served, July 1, 1961 - June 30, 1962; list of case files, arranged alphabetically, undated, [ca. 1960s]. 3 items in 1 folder. Dairy trade hearings, Nos. 1-98, 1961-1964. Arranged by hearing number, which fall in a rough chronological order. Each numbered hearing consists of one folder unless otherwise noted. 1. General Hearing of Proposed Rules and Regulations, June 19, 1961. 2. Foremost Dairies, Minneapolis, July 17, 1961. 3. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Company, Minneapolis, July 17, 1961. 4. Franklin Creamery, Inc., Minneapolis, July 17, 1961. 5. St. Paul Milk Company, St. Paul, July 24, 1961. 6. Franklin Creamery Inc., Minneapolis, July 17, 1961. 7. Progressive Dairies, Inc., Maple Lake, July 24, 1961. 8. Swift & Company, Minneapolis, July 24, 1961. 9. Abrahamson Dairy, St. Paul, July 24, 1961. 10. Polka Dot Dairy and Hastings Cooperative Creamery, Hastings, July 24, 1961. 11. Kroger Company, St. Paul, July 24, 1961. 12. Sanitary Farm Dairy, St. Paul, July 25, 1961. 13. Consumers Milk Company, St. Paul, July 25, 1961. 14. City Dairy-Snowland Foods, Inc., St. Paul and Stillwater, July 25, 1961. 15. Fairmont Foods, Inc., Minneapolis, July 27, 1961. 16. National Food Stores, Inc., Minneapolis, July 27, 1961. 17. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Company, Minneapolis, July 27, 1961. 18. Minnesota Milk Company, St. Paul, July 27, 1961. 19. Schroeder Milk Company, St. Paul, July 27, 1961. 20. Superior-Dairy Fresh, Inc., Minneapolis, August 2, 1961. 21. Cambridge Dairy, Cambridge, August 2, 1961. 22. Cresthaven Dairies, Inc., Zumbrota, August 2, 1961. 23. Country Club Markets, Minneapolis, July 31, 1961. 24. Penny’s Super Markets, Minneapolis, July 31, 1961. findaids\state\agric014.inv AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT. Dairy trade hearing and docket files. p. 4 Location Box 133.B.9.12F 1 25. Crescent Creamery Company, St. Paul, August 3, 1961. 26. Brown’s Ice Cream Company, Minneapolis, August 3, 1961. 27. Maple Plain Creamery, Maple Plain, August 4, 1961. 28. Golden Dairy, Austin, August 7, 1961. 29. Fairmont Foods Company, Minneapolis, August 7, 1961. 30. Land O’Lakes Creamery, Inc., Minneapolis, August 7, 1961. 133.B.9.13B 2 31. Russell Creamery, Brainerd, August 9, 1961. 32. Pederson Dairy, Hopkins, August 14, 1961. 33. Red Owl Stores, August 23, 1961. 34. Twin City Milk Producers Association, September 1, 1961. 35. Super Valu Stores, Inc., Minneapolis, September 14, 1961. 36. King-Pin, Shoppers’ City, St. Paul, October 18, 1961. 37. Applebaums’ Food Markets, St. Paul, October 18, 1961. 38. Twin Cities Milk Dealers, Minneapolis and St. Paul, October 24, 1961. 39. Hearing re: Redwood Falls Area, New Ulm, November 9, 1961. 40. General meeting at Duluth, December 9, 1961. 41. Crescent Creamery Company, St. Paul, December 13, 1961. [42. File missing.] 43. City Dairy-Snowland, Hilmar Laursen, St. Paul, December 13, 1961. 44. General meeting at Hibbing, December 14, 1961. 45. Johnson Brothers, Inc., St. Paul, December 28, 1961. 46. Country Club Markets, St. Paul, January 10, 1962. 47. Home Market, Inc., Duluth, February 16, 1962. 48. Minnesota Dairy Industry Representatives, March 7, 1962. 49. Jim Marrin, Fairmont Foods Company, March 14, 1962. 50. Harold E. Larson, Larson’s Food Market, March 14, 1962. 51. Eugene Theder, Progressive Dairy, March 14, 1962. 52. Karl Schultz, Bridgeman Creameries, March 16, 1962. 53. Joseph Borer, Meadowbrook; Kenneth Walton, Walton Distributors; Earl Kiesner, Fairmont Foods Company, March 21, 1962. 54. Leonard Heller, Jr., Minneapolis, March 21, 1962. 55. Penny’s Super Markets, Inc., Minneapolis, April 4, 1962. 56. National Food Stores, Inc., Hopkins, April 10, 1962. 57. Foremost Dairies, Inc., Minneapolis, April 11, 1962. 58. Rochester Dairy, Rochester, March 9, 1962. 59. Marigold Dairies, Rochester, May 9, 1962. 60. Foremost Dairies, Inc., May 14, 1962. 60A. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Company, May 28, 1962. 61. Russell Creamery Company, May 29, 1962. 62. Fairmont Foods Company, May 17, 1962. findaids\state\agric014.inv AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT. Dairy trade hearing and docket files. p. 5 Location Box 133.B.9.13B 2 63. Knowlan’s Super Market, June 5, 1962. 64. Hearing re: Selected dairy products, July 31, 1962. 65. Al Abrahamson, Joe Borer, Kenneth Walton, September 5, 1962. 66. Van’s Dairy, Robbinsdale, Minnesota, September 18, 1962. 67. Cloverleaf Creamery Company, Minneapolis, November 2, 1962. 68. St. Paul Milk Company, St. Paul, November 20, 1962. 69. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Company, Minneapolis, November 21, 1962. 70. Walsh’s Shopping Center, Inc., Minneapolis, January 15, 1963. 70A. Kroger Company, Walter Baker, St. Paul, January 18, 1963. 71. Land O’Lakes Creameries, Albin Oberlander, Dick Bonde, January 14, 1963. 72. Twin City Milk Dealers, February 8, 1963. 73. Joe Borer, Borer Distributing Company, Minneapolis; William Finnerty, Finnerty Brothers Distributors, Minneapolis; Herbert Koch, Polka Dot Dairy, Hastings; John Nelson, Products Distributors, Minneapolis, February 14, 1963. 74. Kenneth L. Walton, Walton Dairy, March 28, 1963. 75. Dwight Holcombe, Clover Leaf Creamery, April 9-11, 1963. 76. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Company, Leonard Heller, Sr., April 30, 1963. 77. Penny’s Super Markets, Inc., George Levine, September 11, 1963. 78. Applebaums’ Food Markets, et al, November 12-13, 1963. 79. Northland Milk Company, Al Heller, November 22, 1963. 80. Voegel Ice Cream Company, A. F. Voegel, December 3, 1963. 81. Russell Ice Cream Company, Charles H. Russell, December 10, 1963. 82. Hearing re: Selected dairy products, Fairmont, January 8, 1964; State Office Building, January 13, 1964. 83. Superior Dairies, et al, State Office Building, January 16, 1964. 84. Kemps Ice Cream Division, Marigold Foods, Inc., David C. Ramsey, Jr., May 19, 1964. 85. Dwight N. Holcombe, Cloverleaf Creamery Company, May 19, 1964. 86. M. D. Morehouse, Maple Island, Inc., May 20, 1964. 87. Lessard’s Super Market, William Lessard, May 25, 1964. 88. Penny’s Super Markets, Inc., George Levine, June 15, 1964. 89. Country Club Market, Inc., Howard A. Alkire, June 15, 1964. 90. Applebaums’ Food Markets,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ims List Sanitation Compliance and Enforcement Ratings of Interstate Milk Shippers April 2017
    IMS LIST SANITATION COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT RATINGS OF INTERSTATE MILK SHIPPERS APRIL 2017 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration Rules For Inclusion In The IMS List Interstate milk shippers who have been certified by State Milk sanitation authorities as having attained the milk sanitation compliance ratings are indicated in the following list. These ratings are based on compliance with the requirements of the USPHS/FDA Grade A Pasteurized Milk Ordinance and Grade A Condensed and Dry Milk Products and Condensed and Dry Whey and were made in accordance with the procedures set forth in Methods of Making Sanitation Rating of Milk Supplies. *Proposal 301 that was passed at 2001 NCIMS conference held May 5-10, 2001, in Wichita, Kansas and concurred with by FDA states: "Transfer Stations, Receiving Stations and Dairy Plants must achieve a sanitation compliance rating of 90 or better in order to be eligible for a listing in the IMS List. Sanitation compliance rating scores for Transfer and Receiving Stations and Dairy Plants will not be printed in the IMS List". Therefore, the publication of a sanitation compliance rating score for Transfer and Receiving Stations and Dairy Plants will not be printed in this edition of the IMS List. THIS LIST SUPERSEDES ALL LISTS WHICH HAVE BEEN ISSUED HERETOFORE ALL PRECEDING LISTS AND SUPPLEMENTS THERETO ARE VOID. The rules for inclusion in the list were formulated by the official representatives of those State milk sanitation agencies who have participated in the meetings of the National Conference of Interstate Milk Shipments.
    [Show full text]
  • Kemps Jolted Cow Ice Cream Nutrition Facts
    Kemps Jolted Cow Ice Cream Nutrition Facts Product Specifications Serving Size 1/2 cup (66g) Brand Description MFG# GTIN UPC Servings / Container 96 Kemps Jolted Cow Ice Cream 53617 200 41483 04154 2 0 41483 04154 8 Calories 150 Calories from Fat 60 Pack Size Servings/cs Kosher Child Nutrition Total Fat 7 11% 1 3gl 96 Blue Ribbon Kosher DSTAM N/A Saturated Fat 4 20% Trans Fat 0 Grs. Wgt. Net Wgt. Country of Orgin Shelf-Life Storage Cholesterol 25 8% 14.11 lbs 13.76 lbs USA 24 months Best if maintained at or < -15° F. Product must be stored < 0° F Sodium 100 4% Potassium Length Width Height Cube Ti Hi Total Carbohydrate 20 7% 9.875 9.875 10.25 0.578 20 4 Dietary Fiber 0 0% Sugar 15 Ingredients: Protein 2 MILKFAT AND NONFAT MILK, SWEET CREAM BUTTERMILK, CARAMEL (SWEETENED CONDENSED SKIM MILK [CONDENSED SKIM MILK, SUGAR], SUGAR, CORN SYRUP, WATER, BUTTER [CREAM, SALT], SALT, PECTIN, VANILLA EXTRACT, SODIUM Vitamin A 4% 200 IU BICARBONATE), BROWNIE (SUGAR, WHEAT FLOUR, INTERESTERIFIED SOYBEAN OIL, PASTEURIZED EGGS, COCOA PROCESSED WITH ALKALI, RICE SYRUP, WATER, CORNSTARCH, SOY LECITHIN, SALT, NATURAL FLAVOR, BAKING SODA, Vitamin C 0% BAKING POWDER [SODIUM ACID PYROPHOSPHATE, SODIUM BICARBONATE, CORNSTARCH, MONOCALCIUM PHOSPHATE]), Calcium 8% 80 mg SUGAR, CORN SYRUP, WHEY, HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP, CONTAINS LESS THAN 2% OF COFFEE, NATURAL FLAVOR, MONO AND DIGLYCERIDES, GUAR GUM, CALCIUM SULFATE, CAROB BEAN GUM, CARAMEL COLOR, CARRAGEENAN. Iron 0% CONTAINS: MILK, EGGS, WHEAT, SOY. Vitamin D Vitamin E Vitamin K Allergens Thiamin Dairy Egg Wheat Soy Peanuts Tree Nuts Riboflavin Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Niacin Facility uses dairy, eggs, wheat,soy, peanuts and other nuts in manufacturing.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Use This Dairy Plant Directory
    dfs-4001-0601 August 2008 How To Use This Dairy Plant Directory The 2008-2009 Wisconsin Dairy Plant The second section is a numerical listing Directory is designed to enable the user to and the third section is an alphabetical locate and identify the business office and listing of the dairy plants. This is useful plant location of every licensed dairy when tracing the origin of a cheese or dairy plant and bulk milk tanker wash facility product. in Wisconsin. There are 398 dairy plants operating in the In the first section, each plant is listed by State of Wisconsin and they are designated county and is identified by dairy plant with the prefix 55. number, trade name, plant address, telephone number, licensee and mailing There are 50 bulk milk tanker wash address of the home office and facilities and they are designated with the operations. prefix 54. To order additional copies of this directory please send a check for $2.50 per copy, along with your name and address to: Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection, Drawer 93586, Milwaukee, WI 53293-0586. The directory can also be found on our web site http://datcp.state.wi.us You can contact the Division of Food Safety at (608) 224-4700. Last Update: August 2008 Dairy Plant Operation # of Plants Butter Factory 12 Affinage 10 Cheese Factory 138 Breading Cheese 11 Brine System 50 Manufactured Milk Transfer Station 4 Custard Mix 1 Cold Pack 21 Cream 7 Cheese Spreads 10 Manufactured Milk Receiving Station 74 Dairy Flavors 7 UF/RO Systems 49 Enzyme Modified Dairy Products
    [Show full text]
  • 33124462-MIT.Pdf
    RELATIONS BETWEEN THE TRADING AREA POPULATION OF DIFERF TYPES OF SHOPPIRG CENTRS by Edwin Dreyfus Abrams B.A. in Political Science, Boston University (1957) Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master in City Planning at the Massachusett8 Institute of Technology June 1962 Edwin D. Abrams Thas Supervisor T " ,NAi Head,kartment of City and Regional Planning Room 14-0551 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Ph: 617.253.2800 MITLibries Email: [email protected] Document Services http://Iibraries.mit.edu/docs DISCLAIMER OF QUALITY Due to the condition of the original material, there are unavoidable flaws in this reproduction. We have made every effort possible to provide you with the best copy available. If you are dissatisfied with this product and find it unusable, please contact Document Services as soon as possible. Thank you. The images contained in this document are of the best quality available. ACKNOW4 DGEMENTS In a Thesis the student autncr should be skeptical of naming the professors who were of aid, due to the fear that the contents might incriminate those mentioned. Nevertheless, while accepting the total responsibility for the be conent of this Thesis, it would /both ungracious and unkind of me not to thank Professors Fleisher and Haward for the friendship and thoughtfulness which they have repeatedly extended in y behalf. Although they too may trish to disassociate themselves, I would like very much to thank my fellow students whoin many a time of crisis, willing y answered their telephones and came to my aid. ABSTRACT Relations between the Trading Area Population of Different Types of Shoping Centers by Edwin Dreyfus Abrams The purpose of this Thesis is to inquire into the possible relation that may exist between the quality of a shopping center and the characteristics of the people living in proximity thereto.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting
    Heritage Preservation Commission City Hall Council Chambers Regular Meeting July 27, 2021 05:00 PM . PLEASE NOTE THIS IS AN IN-PERSON MEETING AND OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND IN PERSON, UNLESS MEDICALLY UNABLE. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC HAVE THE OPTION TO CALL IN TO PARTICIPATE +1 347-352-4853 PHONE CONFERENCE ID: 768 760 243# OR REQUEST A MEETING INVITATION LINK BY CONTACTING [email protected] . ACCESS TO CITY HALL AFTER 5:15PM WILL BE AVAILABLE ONLY VIA THE ROTUNDA DOORS. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. SET AGENDA 3. APPROVE MINUTES 3.1. June 22, 2021 Meeting Minutes-Draft 4. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY This is an opportunity for the public to provide comments to the Commission regarding items not on the agenda. The public has up to four minutes to provide comments. The Commission will not discuss or take action on them. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.A. None 6. NEW BUSINESS 6.A. Challenged Property – Trinity Lutheran Church 6.A.1. Trinity Church 7. OLD BUSINESS 7.A. Red Owl & Time Theater 7.A.1. Red Owl Heritage Preservation Commission Agenda Tuesday, July 27, 2021 Page 2 of 2 8. OTHER BUSINESS/ANNOUNCEMENTS 8.A. Challenged Property – Zumbro Lutheran Church 8.B. Challendged Property-Christ United Methodist Church 8.C. Request from Mayor’s office for update/verification of contact info 8.D. Historic Integrity Matrix 8.D.1. Other Business 8.E. Update on Olmsted County Bank & Trust 8.F. Proposed Downtown Landmark District Update 8.G. City Council Updates 9.
    [Show full text]
  • DFA Acquires Kemps/Marigold That Figure Compared to 2009’S Price-Depressed Dollar Volume of $8.077 Billion
    DFA’s Bogus “Assets” Equal 86% of Members’ Equity by Pete Hardin * $151,201,000 “Goodwill.” Here’s a bogus “asset” if there ever was one: DFA’s claim of $151.2 million of “Goodwill.” In accounting parlance, “Good- Dairy Farmers of America pledges virtually every asset it controls – will” is the amount overpaid for an acquisition. In other words, DFA is carry- including funds outstanding for members’ milk payments as collateral for the ing $151.2 million of accumulated overpayments. Here’s an example that dairy co-op’s indebtedness. DFA’s 2010 financial audit boasts of $665.107 million in farmers (or, better, their wives) can understand. If a farmer pays $2,000 for a “assets.” But close inspection of some DFA “assets” raises serious questions Holstein milk worth only $1,000, then the farmer technically has a $1,000 cow about the co-op’s financial integrity. In view of crooked antics at DFA, mem- and $1,000 of “Goodwill.” The cow may die, but the farmer still maintains bers’ best interests are served by asking tough questions. Let’s look at some of $1,000 of “Goodwill” for that deceased critter on the books. what DFA calls “assets”: In 2010, DFA’ boosted its “Goodwill” by $32.64 million, according to the * $150,000,000 “Preferred equity securities.” In 2003, DFA offered as audit, due to the acquisition of Castro Cheese Company, Inc. – a marketer of collateral for borrowings some $150 million of “members equity.” Equity is Mexican-style cheeses. The total purchase price of Castro Cheese was $59.7 theoretically the owners’ (i.e., dairy farmer members) share of the business.
    [Show full text]
  • Kemps Finished Product Specification Confidential A
    PRODUCT NAME Kemps 30 lbs Bulk Regular Sour Cream ITEM NUMBER 38156 UPC: 41483-02206 KEMPS FINISHED PRODUCT SPECIFICATION CONFIDENTIAL A. MANUFACTURING LOCATION: FACILITY Farmington ADDRESS 15 Fourth Street CITY/ STATE/ ZIP Farmington, MN 55024 TELEPHONE 651-463-7093 FAX 651-463-3504 PLANT CODE 27-662 B. FINISHED PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: Sour cream is made by combining fresh milk with active cultures to produce a thick and smooth cultured product C. SENSORY ATTRIBUTES: APPEARANCE & COLOR Off White FLAVOR Buttery Cultured Cream Flavor TEXTURE Smooth and Creamy D. FINISHED PRODUCT STANDARDS: CRITICAL PRODUCT TARGET ACCEPTABLE TEST FREQUENCY TEST METHOD/ ATTRIBUTES: RANGE PROCEDURE Coliform ≤10 cfu/mL ≤10 cfu/mL Once each vat TP 27662.11.01.012 % Total Fat 18.10% 18.00 – 18.40% Once each vat TP 27662.11.01.001 TP 27662.11.01.019 % Total Solids 28.00% 26.60 – 29.40% Once each vat TP 27662.11.01.004 MAJOR PRODUCT TARGET ACCEPTABLE TEST FREQUENCY TEST METHOD/ ATTRIBUTES: RANGE PROCEDURE Gross Finished Product Weight 30.05 lbs 29.45 – 30.65 lbs Every 20 minutes TP 27662.11.01.044 pH 4.50 4.20 - 4.60 One each vat TP 27662.11.01.026 Yeast <1 cfu/mL ≤10 One each vat TP 27662.11.01.011 Mold <1 cfu/mL ≤10 One each vat TP 27662.11.01.011 Taste/appearance 5 organoleptic 3-5 organoleptic One each vat TP 27662.02.01.047 rating rating E. STORAGE CONDITIONS: Keep refrigerated ≤45 degrees F. F. SHELF LIFE: Best if used within 65 days of manufacture date when stored at ideal conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Popular Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2019
    St. Louis County, Minnesota 2019 Popular annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019 St. Louis County is committed to transparency and openness. This Popular Annual Financial Report (PAFR) contains simplified, condensed information from the 2019 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Unlike the CAFR, this report does not include the necessary financial statements and notes required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). This PAFR is designed to provide the people and businesses of St. Louis County and beyond an overview of the financial strengths and challenges of serving our diverse communities. Readers of this PAFR should gain a deeper understanding of the organizational and financial structure of St. Louis County, the County's revenues and expenses, how taxpayer dollars are used, and what the County accomplished in 2019. Mission: The mission of St. Louis County is to promote health and safety, ensure sound infrastructure, embrace our natural resources, and support an environment where communities prosper. What's Inside... 2 - Commissioners page 2-4 structure 3 - Organizational Structure 4 - Economy 5 - Accomplishments page 5-7 Highlights 6 - Items of Note 7 - Revenues & Expenses 8 - Fund Balances page 8-9 financials 9 - Cash Flow 9 - Net Position page 10 notables 10 - Looking Ahead Roads & Bridges Access to the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) at: www.stlouiscountymn.gov/budget Commissioners St. Louis County was established in 1856. Located in Northeastern Minnesota, St. Louis County is geographically the largest county east of the Mississippi River, covering 7,092 square miles, including water surface, from the Canadian border. The County's 2019 census population was estimated at 199,070 residents, while the 2010 census population was 196,623.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Jamie Pfuhl, President Minnesota Grocers Association (651) 228-0973 [email protected] Grocers Recognize 2021 Award Winners, Hall of Fame Inductees St. Paul, MN – August 5, 2021 – The Minnesota Grocers Association (MGA) has a long-standing tradition of honoring the best of the best by annually presenting awards to those in the industry that demonstrate excellence, have made significant contributions, and are highly respected by their peers. This year’s award winners are a testament to the vitality of the grocery industry in Minnesota. The awards were presented by MGA Board Chair, Doug Winsor, and MGA President, Jamie Pfuhl on August 1, 2021, at the association’s annual conference in Brainerd, MN. This is the state’s premier event showcasing the pride and tremendous accomplishments of those in the Minnesota food industry. The 2021 Outstanding Grocer award was presented to Mike Stigers, CEO of Cub Foods. He began his nearly 50-year grocery career as a part-time courtesy clerk at the age of 16. He took on managerial positions of increasing responsibility up to CEO and COO of various retailers and vendors throughout the United States. Stigers joined SUPERVALU in 2011 as President of Shaw’s/Star Market in New England. After it was purchased by UNFI in 2018, Stigers was named Executive Vice President of the company’s Fresh Division in addition to being named CEO at Cub Foods – the position he holds today. Since 1968, Cub Foods has been a steady community partner, providing more than groceries to the communities they serve.
    [Show full text]
  • Retail History Data
    Retail History Data Taken from Our Video on the History of American Retailing 12 Largest US Metropolitan Areas, 1930 City Metropolitan Area Population, 1930 NY 10,901 Chicago 4,365 Philadelphia 2,847 Los Angeles 2,318 Boston 2,308 Detroit 2,105 Pittsburgh 1,954 St. Louis 1,294 San Francisco 1,290 Cleveland 1,195 Baltimore 949 Minneapolis 832 Estimated Biggest Single US Department Stores, 1963 Store City Sales ($MM) Macy’s NY 168 Field’s Chicago 135 Hudson’s Detroit 110 A&S Brooklyn 100 Jordan Marsh Boston 90 Lazarus Columbus 85 Bloomingdale’s NY 78 Hudson’s Northland, Detroit 75 Dayton’s Minneapolis 72 Rich’s Atlanta 70 Kaufmann’s Pittsburgh 67 Wanamaker’s Philadelphia 67 Famous-Barr St. Louis 65 Carson Pirie Scott Chicago 60 Filene’s Boston 59 Saks 5th Avenue NY 59 Highest Single Store Revenues Adjusted for Inflation to 2010 Dollars Store City Year Sales in 2010 $ (MM) AT Stewart NY 1873 $ 217 Wanamaker Philadelphia 1902 $ 442 Macy’s New York 1906 $ 403 Field’s Chicago 1906 $ 610 Bon Marche Paris 1906 $ 965 Macy’s NY 1930 $ 1286 Hudson’s Detroit 1953 $ 1242 ? Field’s Chicago 1962 $ 969 Hudson’s Northland 1962 $ 538 Japanese Stores Tokyo 1990s-2000s $ 2500-3000 A&P Number of Stores Year Number of Stores 1860 1 1865 4 1870 11 1881 100 1890 150 1901 198 1906 291 1910 372 1912 480 A&P Number of Stores Year Number of Stores 1912 480 1913 585 1914 991 1915 1,817 1916 2,866 1917 3,782 1918 3,799 1919 4,224 1920 4,621 1923 9,303 1925 14,034 1927 15,671 Largest Grocery Chains 1929 Chain Base Stores Sales ($MM) A&P NY 15,418 $1054 Kroger Cinci
    [Show full text]
  • The NEW Hamdskire
    Wilkinson seeks debate with Wpan by Royal N. Ford side of it .” ually thumb through his copy of this He went on to cite Wyman as the co­ Speaking Wednesday before a gathering list. The man, he asserted, came upon author of a resolution to impeach a sso ­ of 35 persons in the Carroll-Belknao room his own name on the list, and promptly ciate Justice William O. Douglas. The of the Memorial Union, Frank Wilkin­ launched an investigation to determine why move, Wilkinson insisted, was based on son, executive director of the National his name had been included. Wyman’ s reaction to Justice Douglas’ book Committee Against Repressive Legisla­ The investigation revealed, Wilkinson in which Douglas states: “ The search tion, expressed a desire to debate New went on, that because the man had re­ of the youth today is for ways and means Hampshire Republican Representative ceived a newspaper from East Germany to make the m achine--vast bureaucracy Louis Wyman. Wyman, Wilkinson pointed in the 1950’ s, his hometown postmaster of the corporation state and of govern­ out, “ is the one person who should felt obligated to turn his name over to ment that runs that m achine-- the se r ­ be here and isn’t .” the government officials, warning them of vant of man. That is the revolution that Wilkinson’ s opposition to Wyman stems “ a hot one up here in M assachussetts.” is coming. That revolution...need not be from Wyman’s Congressional voting re­ This in itself, Wilkinson stressed, was a repetition of 1776. It could be a rev­ cord as it relates to legislation which deemed sufficient evidence for the man’s olution in the nature of an explosive Wilkinson feels is “ repressive.” name to be placed on the list of “ self- political regeneration.
    [Show full text]
  • • Tos, 1917-1976
    • rAL TOS, 1917-1976 $ •OV.U'10,, V si '^6-191* UPPER ARLINGTON BICENTENNIAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Robert McKnight, Chairman Mrs. John W. Saeger, Co-Chairman - Projects David Hammond, Treasurer Mrs. Edwin B. Hamilton, Vice Chairman - Media Ken Thompson, Vice Chairman - Government BICENTENNIAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS Mrs. Ruth Anderson Mrs. Carl Aschinger, Jr. Art Ballantyne Mrs. Liz Brownell Robert Creamer Dick Franklin Frank Gallo Mrs. Blanche Geisman Mrs. Marion Grasso Dick Greer Roy Haddox Nelson Harper Mrs. H. Carl Haueisen Tom C. Hayward John Jenkins Ronald Johnson Mrs. Carole Langford John H. Nourse Mrs. Dorothy Peterson Jack Phelps Mrs. Martin Peter Sayers James Schott Ron Starbuck FACTS AND PHOTOS COMMITTEE MEMBERS Mrs. Ediwn B. Hamilton, Chairman Mrs. Liz Brownell Mrs. Dan Carmack Mrs. George Jameson Mrs. Carol Reaves Mr. Ron Starbuck, Cover Design UPPER ARLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Richard H. Moore, President Blaine T. Sickles, Vice President Herschel C. Atkinson, Jr. Charles F. Glander George F. Renkert Jack P. Smith John Van Dyke Hal W. Hyrne, City Manager THE CITY OF UPPER ft FACTS AND PHOTOS, 1917-1976 The first newspaper in Franklin County originated in In 1917 the Northwest Community Paper was 1811 in Worthington and was called the Western In­ replaced with a monthly publication edited by Evan telligencer. It was later moved to Columbus and was Mahaffy, The Norwester. The format was similar to a known as the Western Intelligencer and Columbus magazine and included some advertising, news, local Gazette. It was published weekly and from this history, school and church items, and a regular newspaper descended the widely known and in­ feature "Who's Who in Upper Arlington." Our nation fluential Ohio State Journal.
    [Show full text]