DOCSLIB.ORG

Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting Heritage Preservation Commission City Hall Council Chambers Regular Meeting July 27, 2021 05:00 PM . PLEASE NOTE THIS IS AN IN-PERSON MEETING AND OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND IN PERSON, UNLESS MEDICALLY UNABLE. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC HAVE THE OPTION TO CALL IN TO PARTICIPATE +1 347-352-4853 PHONE CONFERENCE ID: 768 760 243# OR REQUEST A MEETING INVITATION LINK BY CONTACTING [email protected] . ACCESS TO CITY HALL AFTER 5:15PM WILL BE AVAILABLE ONLY VIA THE ROTUNDA DOORS. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. SET AGENDA 3. APPROVE MINUTES 3.1. June 22, 2021 Meeting Minutes-Draft 4. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY This is an opportunity for the public to provide comments to the Commission regarding items not on the agenda. The public has up to four minutes to provide comments. The Commission will not discuss or take action on them. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.A. None 6. NEW BUSINESS 6.A. Challenged Property – Trinity Lutheran Church 6.A.1. Trinity Church 7. OLD BUSINESS 7.A. Red Owl & Time Theater 7.A.1. Red Owl Heritage Preservation Commission Agenda Tuesday, July 27, 2021 Page 2 of 2 8. OTHER BUSINESS/ANNOUNCEMENTS 8.A. Challenged Property – Zumbro Lutheran Church 8.B. Challendged Property-Christ United Methodist Church 8.C. Request from Mayor’s office for update/verification of contact info 8.D. Historic Integrity Matrix 8.D.1. Other Business 8.E. Update on Olmsted County Bank & Trust 8.F. Proposed Downtown Landmark District Update 8.G. City Council Updates 9. UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS 10. ADJOURNMENT 3.1 Heritage Preservation Commission Minutes Regular meeting (Virtual) June 22, 2021 – 5pm DISCLAIMER: Meeting minutes herein area a summarization of meeting procedures, not a verbatim transcription. These meeting minutes will not be official until approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. There is no recording of this meeting. Members Present: Barbara Hudson, Barry Skolnick, Christine Schultze, Nancy Bergner, Mark Carlson, Adaheid Mestad (arrived at 5:02), Jeff Fague, Thomas Meilander, (arrived at 5:04) and Gail Eadie (arrived at 5:10, having had technical difficulties getting into the meeting). Members Absent:, None Staff: Ms. Molly Patterson-Lundgren, Urban Design & Heritage Preservation Coordinator; Mr. Brent Carlsen, City Attorney. Call to Order: Quorum present. Agenda adoption: Motion by Commissioner Hudson to adopt agenda as presented, second by Commissioner Skolnick. Approved 5-0. Acceptance of minutes: April 27th – Minutes: Motion by Commissioner Bergner. Second by Commissioner Carlson. Approved 5-0. Commissioner Mestad entered the meeting May 25th – Minutes: Motion by Commissioner Carlson. Second by Commissioner Hudson. Approved 5-0. Commissioner Mestad abstained, being absent from that meeting. Commissioners Fague and Meilander entered the meeting Public Comment Opportunity: No one from the public spoke. Public Hearings: None. New Business: None. Communication: June 22, 2021 Meeting Minutes-Draft (Approve Minutes) Old Business: Ms. Patterson-Lundgren provided an update on the request to remove Potential Landmark Designation for property located at 303 6 Ave SW, the Holt/ McGill House, continued from the April 26 commission meeting. She informed the Commission that the property no longer belonged to the applicant and therefore the application was no longer valid. Ms. Patterson-Lundgren provided an update on the additional information, as requested by the Commission, which was provided in the agenda packet. Chair Schultze asked if any there was any action being requested. Ms. Patterson-Lundgren indicated she would like to know if the Commission would like to continue to consider this for landmark in the future or remove the potential landmark designation. It 1 Packet Pg. 3 3.1 was agreed that the eligibility form should be completed and that the new property owner should be contacted but that there was no hurry or specific time line for this. Ms. Patterson-Lundgren provided an update on the City Council action from June 21st regarding the proposed change to the Heritage Preservation Ordinance. She explained that the Council accepted the recommendation and instructed the City Attorney’s office to proceed in completing the ordinance and bring it for a first reading. A second reading will also be required and will likely happen in August. Chair Schultze asked about the request from Council person Campion regarding a way to better calculate and document on determining landmark eligibility. Ms. Patterson-Lundgren explained that he asked about determining historic integrity and that she had already started to create matrix to look at this, documenting what is already being considered for integrity. Commissioner Hudson asked how this would be applied to their process. Patterson-Lundgren indicated that she would continue to do the evaluations but provide more detailed explanation of how historic integrity was reviewed with a continuum of poor to excellent integrity for each of the 7 aspects of historic integrity. Chair Schultze added that it will further help them with what the Commission is already doing in project reviews and designation evaluation. Commissioner Fague left the meeting at 6 pm. Other Items & Announcements: Chair Schultze asked Ms. Patterson-Lundgren to introduce the two readings provided for discussion. She highlight points from the first article, Why Historic Preservation Needs a new Approach”. She asked for thoughts on the readings, what each member found most interesting and if there were any ideas that could be incorporated into our review process, perhaps into the design guidelines that will be created. Commissioner Bergner said she thinks it is important to allow for adaptive reuse of old buildings, new uses that were different than what they were built for. She suggested that perhaps if someone is allowed to tear down a building of significance, they might be required to meet a higher level of standards for designing the replacement development. Commissioner Eadie said she thinks we need to update the tools we use in reviewing proposed alterations. We risk losing the historic property completely if we apply the Secretary of Interior Standards too literally. Commissioner Hudson said she believed the goal of the commission is to protect the historic integrity and the historically significant features of a property, no matter the location of the feature on the property. She equated historic properties in the City to art within a museum. She offered her home town of Chicago as an example of how neighborhoods have generationally maintained historic integrity throughout years of Communication: June 22, 2021 Meeting Minutes-Draft (Approve Minutes) ownership. She said she feels the charming elegance of Rochester 40 years ago, when she first moved here, is gone and knows people who are grieving for the loss of historic properties in the City Commissioner Meilander said he believes one size does not fit all for the reuse of historic buildings and we need to be able to be flexible in our treatment of them. He thinks we need to continue to look at each individual situation Commissioner Mestad said she appreciated the readings and the comments provided so far, particularly regarding the need to see beyond the binary [historic or non-historic] categories. She pointed out how both articles brought people into the equation and that we have a diversity within the community and that 2 Packet Pg. 4 3.1 spectrum needs to be considered during our evaluations. Bringing metrics and standards into our evaluations will help to explain to others how we review things. We need to be able to look at significance of properties through different cultural lenses to be inclusive all members of the community. Commissioner Skolnick said he doesn’t understand what different lenses mean and that what works in Great Britain, [an example for one of the articles] won’t necessarily work in Rochester Minnesota. Rochester has allowed so much to be destroyed, so preserving what is left is really critical. He agrees that we need to be flexible, but is not happy with recent City Council decision nor proud of our last meeting discussion on the Olmsted Bank & Trust Building. Vice-Chair Carlson liked the first article but found the second one too long and out of context with Rochester to be useful. He is not interest in cities that are much larger and outside of the Midwest. He would prefer if reading materials be provided outside of the agenda packet in the future. He would be interested to see information (articles/stories) about successful adaptive reuse of historic properties with additions. Chair Schultze discussed how the Older, Smaller, Better… report supports the retention of these properties, because of the mix of scale and design that they bring to an area. They are a valuable resource in that they help to provide a diversity in how individuals (of diversity) experience a community, neighborhood, or district. She further discussed how the development of scoring sheets with key indicators and measures that consider economic value, including the value of building reuse from a sustainability/resiliency standpoint may help us in making decisions and in communicating the reason behind the decisions made. Chair Schultze also mentioned how the author of the article, Why Historic Preservation Needs a New Approach, is currently with the National Main Street Center, but also served as Director of Sustainability at the National Trust in the past and Seattle-based Preservation Green Lab before that. Ms. Patterson-Lundgren provided an update on the proposed Downtown Landmark District. She indicated that the request for proposals (RFP) for the riverfront small area plan has been drafted and the plan is to bring it to City Council in July. The small area plan will focus on the riverfront area (Red Owl/Time Theater property, parking lot and parking ramp) but also will look for ways that it can be connected to the proposed historic district of 3rd Street and Broadway Avenue.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Inventory of Its Dairy Trade Hearing and Docket Files
    MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Minnesota State Archives AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT An Inventory of Its Dairy Trade Hearing and Docket Files OVERVIEW OF THE RECORDS Agency: Minnesota. Dept. of Agriculture. Series Title: Dairy trade hearing and docket files. Dates: [ca. 1957] – 1976 (bulk 1957-1976). Abstract: Hearing and docket files documenting the department’s role in regulating unfair trade practices in the dairy products industry, particularly the under pricing of products. Quantity: 12.1 cu. ft. (11 boxes and 2 partial boxes). Location: See Detailed Description section for box locations. SCOPE AND CONTENTS OF THE RECORDS In 1961, the administration of the Dairy Industry Unfair Trade Practices Act of 1957 was transferred from the Department of Business Development to the Agriculture Department. The purpose of the law was to stabilize prices on selected dairy products and to prevent unfair trade practices in marketing those products. It required manufacturers, wholesalers, and distributors of milk and selected dairy products to file schedules of prices at which sales would be made wholesale to retailers and governed unfair trade practices, particularly the under pricing of products. The hearings files (ca. 1960s-1976, bulk 1957-1961) consist mainly of hearing transcripts, most often with company employees; while the docket files (ca. 1957-1976) contain transcripts, assorted legal documents, and facilitative correspondence. Mainly dealing with under pricing claims, the files cover wholesalers and retailers statewide and a few in neighboring states. ARRANGEMENT OF THE RECORDS Arranged in two series: a set of numerical hearings files (ca. 1960s – 1964) and a set of docket files (ca. 1957-1976). The latter is divided into alphabetical (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Jamie Pfuhl, President Minnesota Grocers Association (651) 228-0973 [email protected] Grocers Recognize 2021 Award Winners, Hall of Fame Inductees St. Paul, MN – August 5, 2021 – The Minnesota Grocers Association (MGA) has a long-standing tradition of honoring the best of the best by annually presenting awards to those in the industry that demonstrate excellence, have made significant contributions, and are highly respected by their peers. This year’s award winners are a testament to the vitality of the grocery industry in Minnesota. The awards were presented by MGA Board Chair, Doug Winsor, and MGA President, Jamie Pfuhl on August 1, 2021, at the association’s annual conference in Brainerd, MN. This is the state’s premier event showcasing the pride and tremendous accomplishments of those in the Minnesota food industry. The 2021 Outstanding Grocer award was presented to Mike Stigers, CEO of Cub Foods. He began his nearly 50-year grocery career as a part-time courtesy clerk at the age of 16. He took on managerial positions of increasing responsibility up to CEO and COO of various retailers and vendors throughout the United States. Stigers joined SUPERVALU in 2011 as President of Shaw’s/Star Market in New England. After it was purchased by UNFI in 2018, Stigers was named Executive Vice President of the company’s Fresh Division in addition to being named CEO at Cub Foods – the position he holds today. Since 1968, Cub Foods has been a steady community partner, providing more than groceries to the communities they serve.
    [Show full text]
  • Participating Distributors Revised 05.26.15 Page 1 of 13
    Participating Distributors Revised 05.26.15 Page 1 of 13 Recently Added Distributors Blair’s Market Dick’s TDL Group Corp (Tim Hortons) Blazer’s Fresh Foods DJ’s Inc Calgary Food Bank Blue Mountain Foods DJ’s Pilgrim Market The North West Company Bob’s Supermarket Don’s Market M&M Meat Shops Ltd. Bob’s Valley Don’s Thriftway T.I.G.O. Trading Bowman’s Double D Market Devash Farms Bradley’s Bestway Dove Creek Superette KCCP Distribution Company Broulim’s Market Downey Food Center Nutricion Fundemental Burney & Company Dry Creek Stations Pasquier Busy Corner Market Duane’s Foodtown Horizon Distributors Ltd. Buy Low Market Duckett’s Market Fruiticana Produce Ltd. Cactus Pete’s Country Store El Mexicano Market Dollarama L.P. Caliente Store El Rancho Market Camas Creek Country Store El Rodeo Market 99 Cents Only Stores Canyon Foods Elgin Foodtown Affiliated Foods Midwest Carter’s Market Emigrant General Store Affiliated Foods Inc - Amarillo Cash and Carry Foods Etcheverry’s Foodtown Ahold Cedaredge Foodtown F T Reynolds American Sales Company Central Market Familee Thriftway Giant Foods Chappel’s Market Family Foods Martin’s Foods Chuck Wagon General Family Market Stop & Shop Clarke’s Country Market Farmer’s Corner Albertson’s LLC Clark’s Market Farmer’s Market ACME Clinton Market Finley’s Food Farm Aldi Colter Bay Store Flaming George Market Asian Imports/Navarro Transportation Columbine Market Food Ranch Bestway Associated Food Stores (Far West) Cook’s Foodtown Food RoundUp A&A Market Cooperative Mercantile Corp Food World Thriftway Adamson’s Corner Market Fortine Merc. Alamo Store Cottonwood Market Fresh Approach Aldapes Market Cottonwoods Foods Fresh Market Allen’s Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Presence News
    June 2021 Volu me 18, Issue 06 Southwest Presence News Whole Foods Market Announces Consolidation of Departments Inside this issue Last month, Whole Foods Market announced plans to streamline operations across multiple departments Southwest 1 including merchandising, store-level operations, technology, and human resources. In a letter to its staff and accompanying online statement, the company announced it will consolidate the global and regional Northwest 3 merchandising teams into one team responsible for companywide purchasing. Regional operations East 5 teams will now focus solely on store-level operations, including merchandising execution, eCommerce, West 6 and store support. According to Whole Foods Market, the move will create new regional leadership roles in local product development and supplier relationships, while also elevating the selection of local, Midwest 9 exclusive, and emerging brands. In 2020, Whole Foods Market said that it introduced more than 950 Rocky Mountain 11 local brands, over 10,000 local items and more than 650 exclusive brands. Under the centralized purchasing structure, local, emerging, and exclusive brands will continue to be supported. The new Distributor News 12 structure will also provide staff with better-defined roles, new growth opportunities and clear paths for Data Update 14 advancement within operations and merchandising. The memo did not specify if the consolidation would result in layoffs at global or regional offices, but it did confirm that no jobs at the store and distributor Food Policy 16 level would be affected. Coffee Talk 19 Whole Foods Market is refocusing its technology department toward software engineering, technical New Hope 20 products, and program manager roles.
    [Show full text]
  • There's More to Grocery Than Food
    A Grocery Perspective: There’s More to Grocery Than Food Speakers: Elliott Olson, Dakota Worldwide Jim Hornecker, SUPERVALU Paul Tucci, Oppidan, Inc. Moderators: Dave Bade, RLK Incorporated Brent Anderson Elliott W Olson Dakota Worldwide Corporation, Inc TWIN CITIES GROCERY 1972 Dominant Players • Applebaum’s • Country Club • Penny’s •Red Owl • National Tea • Shoppers City • Super Valu & Byerly’s • Lund’s 2009 Share of Sales 2011 Share of Sales “Everybody want’s to get into the act.” Jimmy Durante Costco Sam’s Club Dollar General Dollar Tree Family Dollar United Noodles Target Wal*Mart Aldi Farmer’s Markets Co-ops Whole Foods Coborns Alice & Gilt & More CVS Walgreens Fresh Fruit & Veggies Meat & Sushi Walgreens Share of Stomach THE ONLY CONSTANT IS CHANGE Attribution • Market share courtesy of John Dean. • Share of stomach “Who Eats What, When and From Where? Andrea Carlson, Jean Kinsey, Carmel Nadov Working Paper 98-05, The Retail Food Industry Center, University Of Minnesota. SUPERVALU Jim Hornecker Director of Real Estate SUPERVALU is Big • One of the largest grocery companies in the U.S. • Annual Revenue: $37.5 billion (FY11) • 140,000 employees • #61 on the 2011 Fortune 500 SVU is National SVU Has 3 Big Parts • 1,114 traditional retail supermarkets – 805 in-store pharmacies • 1,280 hard-discount stores – 899 stores operated by license owners • 2,700 independent locations serviced by our Independent Business Segment – Primary supplier to 1,900 stores Check out SVU’s Banners Save-A-Lot Independent Business Cub Foods: #1 in the Twin
    [Show full text]
  • Happy New Year! Ome Time Ago, We Were Going to You, We Completed Our Remodel Over 3 Ago, We Were About the Only Natural Food Through Old Board Materials
    MEET YOUR NEW BOARD DIRECTORS, PAGE 7 www.rivermarket.coop December 2017- January 2018 Happy New Year! ome time ago, we were going to you, we completed our remodel over 3 ago, we were about the only natural food through old board materials. Some years ago. I think we did the right thing store in town (except for a very noble S of it was very well organized, some to remodel before the grocery wars picked experiment by Applebaums). We were was not. It was fun and instructive to see up in these parts. Competition will never used to having “quirky food” that shoppers people I’ve known as customers had also go away. The war doesn’t just stop. In the had never seen before. Today a lot of that served on the board of directors before 60’s I bagged groceries at the St. Anthony “quirky food” can be found in almost any I started at River Market. Another fun Village Red Owl store. Right in our shop- retail grocery store. That’s different. The tidbit was from old financials: December ping center there was another grocery word “organic” associated with patchouli used to be our biggest sales month while store (Penny’s Supermarket I think) and oil, bulk foods, and long-haired hippies now that recognition goes to May – the an S. S. Kresge’s. Central Avenue had in the 70’s, is mainstream today. Like our very start of the local season. December many grocery stores – Country Club was Stillwater traffic situation, isn’t it a greater was our 5th slowest month last year.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Business Express Tabulated Data Based on Department of Economic and Community Development (DECD) – Business Assistance Portfolio
    Small Business Express Tabulated Data Based on Department of Economic and Community Development (DECD) – Business Assistance Portfolio Fiscal Year Company Name 2013 Berkshire Industrial Services, LLC 2017 Commercial Storefront Services, Inc. 2012 Darter Specialities, Inc. 2013 Engage 121, Inc aka ENR Services, Inc. 2012 Globele Energy, LLC 2013 Korfel, LLC dba Critterfence 2012 MacNaughton Builders, LLC 2012 Outbound, Inc. 2013 Positiv-A-Tea, LLC 2013 Precision Wire Cut Corporation 2014 Vaz Quality Works, LLC 2017 Young Developers, LLC 2013 Executive 2000 Transportation, LLC 2013 R & R Tool & Die, LLC 2014 Grey Wall Software, LLC 2015 Picture That, LLC 2013 Numet Machining Techniques, Inc. 2016 Dutch Oil Company, Inc. 2017 Summit7, LLC dba Zaniac Greenwich Page 1 of 828 09/28/2021 Small Business Express Tabulated Data Based on Department of Economic and Community Development (DECD) – Business Assistance Portfolio Company Address Municipality State Zip Code 3595 Winston Road Torrington CT 06790 470 Governor's Highway South Windsor CT 06074 P.O. Box 188 Cheshire CT 06410 20 Glover Avenue Norwalk CT 06850 240 Sargeant Drive New Haven CT 06511 P.O. Box 54 New Hartford CT 06057 P.O. Box 270 East Granby CT 06026 167 Cherry Street Milford CT 06460 P.O. Box 535 Shelton CT 06484 1875 Thomaston Avenue Waterbury CT 06704 179 Williams Street Bridgeport CT 06608 70 Centerbrook Road Hamden CT 06514 11 Alcap Ridge, Suite D Cromwell CT 06416 94 Newberry Road East Windsor CT 06088 129 Church Street, #321 New Haven CT 06510 1266 East Main Street, Suite 700R Stamford CT 06902 60 Old South Avenue Stratford CT 06615 35 William F.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Shopping Practices of Upper Income
    strongly influenced by household size and varied inversely with shopping fre­ quency. Frequency Shopping frequency was related pri­ marily to household size and less sig­ nificantly to the wife's incidence and extent of gainful employment or age. Members of large households shopped more often than the average, and em­ ployed homemakers shopped less often. Shopping frequency increased with age of the wife in the lower age range. Food Shopping Practices of Upper However, shopping frequency dimin­ ished with age among older women. Income Families in Minneapolis-St. Paul Time of Day We found relatively minor variations Maria Thiele-Wittig and Marguerite C. Burk in the distribution of shopping trips This article, the third in a series, re­ Costs of handling frequent small or­ among parts of the day: 28 percent be­ ports results of a study of upper income ders, keeping stores open for long fore noon, 24 percent from noon to 3 families in Minneapolis-St. Paul.' To be hours, and coping with concentrated p.m., 30 percent from 3 to 6 p.m., and 18 included in the survey, husband and shopping in limited time periods add to percent after 6 p.m. wife families had to have a minimum the marketing margin for farm com­ Factors related to timing of shopping gross income level of $8,000 in 1964 and modities. Knowledge of food shopping during the day were: (1) stage in the larger families had to have $10,000. practices is also useful for consumer family life cycle, (2) social placement," The following types of grocery shop­ education.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Companies in Minnesota: How Many Are There?
    RESEARCH REPORT Food Companies in Minnesota How Many are There? Jean Kinsey and Koel Ghosh Author’s Note: This report is a work in progress. If you have different information about your company than is reported herein, please email [email protected] and we will collaboratively work on updating the information. Jean Kinsey is a Professor of Applied Economics and Director of The Food Industry Center at the University of Minnesota. Koel Ghosh is a Research Associate for The Food Industry Center. The work was sponsored by The Food Industry Center, University of Minnesota, 317 Classroom Office Building, 1994 Buford Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108-6040, USA. For more information about the Center, visit The Food Industry Center website at http://foodindustrycenter.umn.edu. The analyses and views reported in this paper are those of the authors. They are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Applied Economics, by The Food Industry Center, or by the University of Minnesota. The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation. Copyright ©2010 by Jean Kinsey and Koel Ghosh. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. Table of Contents Introduction page 1 How did
    [Show full text]
  • WGA Honorees List 2019
    Grocer of the Year PAST RECIPIENTS 2019 Marlin Greenfield, Festival Foods (retired) 1997 Ron Brasch & Lloyd Coppersmith, Ron & Lloyd’s 2018 Dave Spiegelhoff, 1996 Joe Conrad, Conrad’s Sentry Gooseberries Fresh Food Market 1995 Dick Rinehart, Dick’s IGA 2017 Mark & Brett Stinebrink, 1994 Tom Fox, Schultz Sav-O Stores Stinebrink’s Piggly Wiggly 1993 Buck Nelson, Nelson’s Superstore 2016 Alan Alden 1992 George Prescott, Prescott’s Supermarkets 2015 Jim Tadych, Tadych’s Econofoods 1991 Robert Pavil, The Copps Corp. 2014 Mark Skogen, Skogen’s Festival Foods 1990 Jo M. Benidt (Weis), Benidt’s Foods 2013 Jeff Maurer, Fresh Madison Market 1989 Jim DeWees, Godfrey Co. 2012 Tim and Kevin Metcalfe, Metcalfe’s Markets 1988 William Czerwonka, Bill’s Red Owl 2011 Dennis Kramer, Kramer’s County Market 1987 Clifford Kowalski, Godfrey Co. 2010 Lee Guenther, T.A. Solberg Co., Inc./Trig’s 1986 Tom Verhagen, Larry’s Markets 2009 Margaret Harris, & Ted, Patrick, and Nick Balistreri, Sendik’s Markets 1985 Robert Rindt, Rindt Enerprises 2008 Rosemary & Leo Hansen, Hansen’s IGA 1984 Ray Alpert, ABC Supermarket 2007 Mark Anderson, Supervalu 1983 Harold F. Lindell, Lindell’s Inc. 2006 Pat & Bob Fox, Fox Brothers Piggly Wiggly 1982 Herman Schwartz, Mid-State Grocers Association 2005 Dave Skogen, Skogen’s Festival Foods 1981 Don Copp, The Copps Corp. 2004 Tom Metcalfe, Metcalfe’s Markets 1980 Richard Brodbeck, Brodbeck Enterprises 2003 Layton Olsen, Olsen’s Piggly Wiggly 1979 John A. Godfrey, Godfrey Co. 2002 Terry & Kathy Rank, Lakewood Supervalu 1978 Ralph Moehring, S.C. Shannon Co. 2001 John McAdams, McAdams’s Pick ‘n Save 1977 Val Frank, Frank’s Market 2000 Jerry & MaryLou Baryenbruch, 1976 Vic & Don Burnstad, Burnstad’s Hometown Supermarket 1975 Howard Hill, Certco 1999 Jerry Lestina, Roundy’s Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Grocery Update: a Whole New Ball Game
    Grocery Update: A Whole New Ball Game Panelists: Elliott Olson, Dakota Worldwide Jim Hornecker, SUPERVALU Minneapolis Shopping Center Association Changes in Food Retailing 2015 Elliott Olson Change is Natural Successful people in real estate have a platonic ideal of always being in a state of becoming. MSCA 2015 2 Market Share Everybody loves to see market share (the sports page of business) MSCA 2015 3 Country Club MSCA 2015 4 Red Owl MSCA 2015 5 National Tea MSCA 2015 6 Applebaum’s MSCA 2015 7 Penny’s MSCA 2015 8 2013 Market Share (gross sales) Kowalski's County Market Knowlan's Natural Foods 1.7% 1.6% 1.5% 1.4% Trader Joe's 1.8% Nash Finch 1.4% Co-op's 2.3% Cub Foods Coborn's 29.8% 2.8% Aldi 3.0% Independents 4.9% Lunds/Byerly's Rainbow Wal-Mart Target, 7.4% 10.0% 13.2% 17.3% MSCA 2015 9 Sparks of Change Population growth resumes in the core cities. MSA will gain 783,000 in next thirty years More racially and ethnically diversity. Propensity of people to cluster. 2000-2010 growth rates: 75% Hispanic 60% Black 51% Asian 11% Am Indian 3% White MSCA 2015 10 Sparks of Change Blurring of classes of trade Increased population density decreases the range needed for a supporting threshold. Distributed refrigeration lowering costs and ease of entry for dollar stores and drug stores. Obsolescence of older stores. Poor performance of some stores. New competitors: Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s, Aldi Competitors coming soon: Fresh Thyme, Hy-Vee On their radar? WM Neighborhood Markets, Meijer’s MSCA 2015 11 Sparks of Change Diverse life styles even within the family unit: schedules, food choices Health concerns about food: Organic, natural, pesticides.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Grocery Sales Page 14
    wisconsingrocers.com | Summer Issue 2019 On the fence with Online grocery sales Page 14 Review in GROCERS the CAPITOLDAY Page 8 try G us o d l In f y O r e u c t o r i n G g n i s n o c s i SCW RE WGA’s Grocery Industry Golf Outing Page 23 CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED SERVICE CHANGE 10 W. Mifflin Street, Suite 205 • Madison, WI 53703 WI Madison, • 205 Suite Street, Mifflin W. 10 Wisconsin Grocers Association Grocers Wisconsin 2 WISCONSIN GROCER www.wisconsingrocers.com 2019 Summer Issue WISCONSIN GROCER 3 4 WISCONSIN GROCER www.wisconsingrocers.com 2019 Summer Issue WGA Board of Directors Chair Jeff Maurer Maurer’s Market, Wisconsin Dells, WI THE PRESIDENT’S PERSPECTIVE 7 MEMBER SERVICE Vice Chair Greg Hansen Hansen’s IGA, Bangor, WI Report Card REPRESENTATIVE 18 Secretary/Treasurer New Board Members Are you leveraging your WGA Membership? Michelle Harrington Albrecht’s Delafield Market, Delafield, WI GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS FRESH SUMMER FRUIT 19 Steve Burkhardt Grocers in the Capitol Day: Approved 8 Guest Column Skogen’s Festival Foods, DePere, WI Grocers Day in Washington 9 Greg Cross THE HISTORY OF GROCERY 20 SpartanNash, St. Cloud, MN Friend of Grocers Awards 10 Bob Fleming Key Friend of Grocers Vote: Fox Run Sentry, Waukesha, WI WGA Position Papers 11 SCORE — GROCERY INDUSTRY Jim Hyland GOLF OUTING REVIEW 23 Roundy’s/Pick ‘n Save, ON THE FENCE WITH ONLINE Milwaukee, WI 5 TIPS ON VIDEO ADS 32 Bob Jaskolski, T.A. Solberg, Inc., GROCERY SALES 14 Minocqua, WI WGA BUSINESS PARTNER’S Steve Loehr Kwik Trip, La Crosse, WI ONLINE SHOPPING FOR Jeff McClure UNFI, Green Bay, WI GROWTH AND PROFITABILITY 17 PROFILES 33 Kevin Metcalfe Metcalfe’s Market, Guest Column Madison, WI MEMBER EVENTS AND Rick Roth HAPPENINGS 36 Great Lakes Coca-Cola, Plover, WI Robert Rothove Associated Wholesale Grocers, Kenosha, WI PROFESSIONAL CARDS 44-45 Dave Ryman Certco, Madison, WI Dave Spiegelhoff Advertisers Gooseberries, Burlington, WI Associated Wholesale H Brooks.
    [Show full text]