AL Kroeber and Catharine Holt Source
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Masks and Moieties as a Culture Complex. Author(s): A. L. Kroeber and Catharine Holt Source: The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 50 (Jul. - Dec., 1920), pp. 452-460 Published by: Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2843493 Accessed: 01-02-2016 04:49 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Wiley and Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 204.235.148.92 on Mon, 01 Feb 2016 04:49:06 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 452 MASKS AND MOIETIES AS A CULTURE COMPLEX. By A. L. KROEBERAND CATHARINEHOLT. IN 1905, Graebnerand Ankermannpublished synchronous articlesL in which they distinguisheda nlumberof successivelayers of culturein Oceania and Africa. This scheme Graebnersubsequently developed in an essay which traced at least some of these culturestrata as far as America.2 Graebner'stheory has been accepted, with or without reservations,by a number of authorities,including Foy,3 W. Schmidt,4and Rivers.5 The sequence of culturesrecognized is Tasmanian Nigritic, Southeast AustralianNigritic, West Papuan or PatrilinealTotemic, East Papuan or Matrilineal Two-class, Melanesian or Bow, Proto-Polynesian,Late or North Polynesian,Indonesian. Each of these culture strata is characterizedby a com- binationor complexof certainelements. Some of the principalof thesedistinguish- ing componentsof the severalculture complexes are Tasmanian: cremation,windbreak, throwing sticks, scarification. Southeast Australian: boomerang, bee-hive huts, parrying shield, coiled basketry,knocking out of teeth. WVestPapu(an: patrilineal and totemic local groups, totem increase rites, scaffoldburial, circumcision,spear-thrower, conical hut, bark or dug-out canoe. East Papuan: matrilinealmoieties, secret societies with masks,skull worship, gabled houses and tree houses,carpentered canoe of planks,fire-saw, pan- pipe, knobbedclubs. Melanesian: flat self-bow,crutch paddle, bamboo comb, pile dwellings,skin drum,hammock, head-hunting, pig, betel, sago, spiral ornamentation. 1 " Kulturkreiseund Kulturschichtenin Ozeanien" and " Kulturkreiseund Kulturschichten in Afrika,"Zeitschrift fiir Ethnologie, XXXVII, 28-53 and 54-90, 1905. 2 "Die MelanesischeBogenkultur und ihre Verwandten,"Anthropos, IV, 726-780, 998- 1032,1909. 3 F9hrerdurch das Rautenstrauch-JoestMuseum, Cologne, 1906. 4 c"Die KulturhistorischeMethode in der Ethnologie,"Anthropos, VI, 1010-1036,1901; "Die Gliederungder AustralischenSprachen," ibid., VII, 230 seq., 1912; " Kulturkreiseund Kulturschichtenin Suid-Amerika,"Zeitschrift fiir Ethnologie, XLV, 1014-1124,1913. 6 cc The EthnologicalAnalysis of Culture,"Report of theBritish Association for the Advance- mentof Sciencefor 1911, 1-10. Rivers accepts Graebner'smethod of attack ratherthan his results. This content downloaded from 204.235.148.92 on Mon, 01 Feb 2016 04:49:06 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Masks and Moietiesas a CultureComplex. 453 Proto-Polynesian: canoe with single outrigger,triangular sail, composite fish-hook,flattened clubs, fire-plough,caste and taboo system. NorthPolynesian : sail attachedto mast,shark tooth weapons. Indonesian: double outrigger,square sail, blow-gun. UTnderthe Graebnerianhypothesis, the foregoingelements, in whateverpart of the worldthey may now be found,go back to a migrationof people or a stream of influenceemanating from the culturethat firstevolved the elementsin question. The presentstudy was undertakenat the personalsuiggestion of Foy to test a portionof the hypothesis,as a sample of the validityof the whole.against the facts as they are available in North Americanethnography. If for instance moieties and masks were really associated as integral membersof the " East Papuan" culture,and thisculture spread as a unitfrom Oceania or Asia to America,then those AmericanIndian tribes that were seriouslyaffected by this East Papuan culture should normallypossess both moieties and masks, while those that remained uninfluencedshould lack both. In otherwords, two elementsassociated in one of Graebner'scultures should show a positivecorrelation in theirdistribution. If the correlationproved negligibleor absent, the elementsmust have developed inde- pendentlyor have been introducedseparately. In the lattercase the historyof the diffusionof each elementmight still be tracedfrom one continentto another,but the unifiedor integratedculture complexesthat Graebnerposits as originswould be provedunreal. The assemblageand analysisof the data that followhas been the workof Holt, whileKroeber is responsiblefor the methodologicaldiscussion. A reviewof the literature,for- America, north of Mexico,results as follows' 1. Tribeshaviny masks and exogamousmoieties. Tlingit(Swanton, B.A.E.-R., XXVI, 398, 435-436,463, 1908; Dall, B.A.E.-R., III, 110-136, 1884-; Boas, U.S.N.M., 1895, 323, 1897; Boas, B.A.E.-R., XXXI, 498, 1916). Haida (the three last cited, pp. 110-120, 323, 480, respectivehy). Miwok (Gifford,U.C., XII, 139-141, 1916). Salinan (Mason, U.C., X, 189, 1912; Gifford,U.C., XI, 295, 1916; and inf'nKroeber).2 1 Abbreviations: A.A., AmericanAnthropologist; A.A.A.-M., Memoirs of the American AnthropologicalAssociation; A.M.N.H.-A.P., -B, -H, -M, AnthropologicalPapers, Bulektin, Handbooks,Memoirs of the AmericanMuseum of Natural History; B.A.A.S., Reportsof the BritishAssociation for the Advancement of Science; B.A.E.-B., -IR,Bulletins, Reports of the Bureau of AmericanEthnology; C.I.A., CongresInternational des Am&ricanistes;J.A.F.L., JournalOj AmericanFolk-Lore; U.C., Universityof CaliforniaPublications in AmericanArchceology and Ethnology;U.S.N.M., Reportsof the U.S. NationalMuseum. 2 Curtainsof cord,grass, or feathersworn by initiateddancers impersonating spirits in the Californiaarea have been countedas masksbecause theydisguise the identityof the wearerin ritual. This content downloaded from 204.235.148.92 on Mon, 01 Feb 2016 04:49:06 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 454 A. L. KROEBER AND CATHARINE HOLT. Tribeshaving masks and non-exogamousmoieties. Tewa (Goddard,A.M.N.H.-H., No. 2, 98, 107, 1913). Hidatsa (Lowie, A.M.N.H.-A.P., XI, 292, 315, 1913, and inf'n). Mandan (Wlilland Spinden,Pap. Peabody Museum, III, 129-131, 1906; Brower, Mem. Explor. Basin Mississippi, VIII, St. Paul, 1904). Omaha (Fletcher and La Flesche, B.A.E.-R., XXVII, 370, 481, 1911). Iowa (Skinner, A.M.N.H.-A.P., XI, 713, 1915; B.A.E.-B., XXX). Iroquois (Dall, B.A.E.-R., III, 144-145, 1884; Goldenweiser,Anthropology in North America,1915). 2. Tribeshaving masks but no moieties. Eskimo of Alaska (Dall, B.A.E.-R., III, 110-136, 144-145, 1884; Nelson, B.A.E.-R., XVIII, 322, 393, 1899). Eskimo of Hudson Bay (Boas, B.A.E.-R., VI, 608, 1889). Eskimoof Baffin Land (ibid.,605-606). Kutchin (Chapman,C.I.A., XV, pt. 2,16-32,1907; Swanton,A.A., n.s. VII, 667,1905). Tsimshian(Boas, U.S.N.M., 1895, 323, 1897; Boas, B.A.E.-R., XXXI, 480, 539, 1916). Niska (Boas, B.A.A.S., LXV, 569-571, 1895). Bella Coola (Boas, B.A.A.S., LXI, 412-414, 1891); Heiltsuk (Boas, B.A.A.S., LIX, 825-827, 1890 ; U.S.N.M., 1895, 621-661, 1897). Kwakiutl (Boas, B.A.A.S., LIX, 825-827, 1890 ; ibid., LX, 617, 1890; U.S.N.M., 1895, 328, 435, 1897). Nutka (B.A.A.S., LX, 583-584, 1890). Maka (Dall, B.A.E.-R., III, 106, 1884; Lewis, A.A.A.-M., I, 153-156, 1906). Clallam, Lummi, Squamish (ibid.), Lkungen (Boas, B.A.A.S., LX, 569, 1890, U.S.N.M., 1895, 645, 1897). Lillooet (Teit, A.M.N.H.-M., IV, 257-258, 1906). Thompson (A.M.N.H.-M., II, 299, 1900). Shushwap(Teit, A.M.N.TI.,IV, 612, 1909). Pomo (Barrett, U.C., XII, 407, 1917, and inf'n Gifford). Maidu (Dixon, A.M.N.H.-B., XVII, 223, 289, 1905). WVintun,Costanoan (inf'n Kroeber). Hopi (Fewkes, B.A.E.-R., XIX, 573-633, 1900 [1902]: Fewkes, B.A.E.-R., XXI, 3-126, 1903). Zuiii (Stevenson,B.A.E.-R., XXIII, passim, 1904; Kroeber,A.M.N.H.-A.P., XVIII, 94, 1917). Navaho (Matthews,A.M.N.H.- M., VI, 55-57, 1902; B.A.E.-B., XXX, pt. 2, 44, 1910). Wescalero Apache (Goddard, A.M.N.H.-H., No. 2, 127-128, 1913). Chiricahua Apache (ibid., B.A.E.-B., XXX, 282-284). Pinma(Russell, B.A.E.-R. XXVI, 266, 1908; Goddard,A.M.N.H.-H., No. 2, 161, 1913). Arikara (B.A.E.-B., XXX, 83-86; Lowie, A.M.N.II.-A.P., XI, 661, 1915). Crow (ibid., 207; Goldenweiser,Anthropology in NorthAmerica, 370, 371, 1915). Assiniboine (Lowie, A.M.N.II.-A.P., IV, 65-66, 1909). Black- foot (Wissler, A.M.N.II.-A.P., VII, 424, 1911). Plains Cree (Skinner, A.M.N.H.-A.P., XI, 517, 530, 1914). Plains Ojibwa (ibid., 481-482, 500). Delaware (Skinner,A.M.N.H.-A.P., III, 21, 1909; Swanton,A.A., n.s. VII, 666, 667, 1905). This content downloaded from 204.235.148.92 on Mon, 01 Feb 2016 04:49:06 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Masks and Moietiesas a CultureComplex. 455 3. Tribeshaving moieties but no masks. Cahuilla, Cupe-no,Serrano, Western Mono (non-exogamous),Central Yokuts (Gifford,U.C., XI, 292, 1916, and U.C., XIV, 155-219, 1918, and inf'n Kroeber). Winnebago(inf'n P. Radin). 4. Tribeshaving neither moieties nor masks.