A Cultural Resources Inventory of Portions of Sulphur Springs Valley and San Bernardino Valley in Cochise County, Arizona

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Cultural Resources Inventory of Portions of Sulphur Springs Valley and San Bernardino Valley in Cochise County, Arizona A CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY OF PORTIONS OF SULPHUR SPRINGS VALLEY AND SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY IN COCHISE COUNTY, ARIZONA Prepared by: Mary Lou Heuett Principal Investigator Ronald P. Maldonado Project Director Submitted to: Jim Sober, Line Extension Supervisor Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. P.O. Box 820 Willcox, Arizona 85644 October 1990 Technical Series No. 21 ABSTRACT A Class III (100% coverage) survey of 58 miles of a 60- and 120-foot-wide right-of-way corridor was conducted by Cultural & Environmental Systems, Inc. (C&ES) for Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. (SSVEC), to assess and record new and previously recorded archaeological sites within and adjacent to the project area as part of SSVEC's planning effort for the proposed right-of-way (Phases A through C). The 436-acre project area, located approximately 7 miles to 15 miles north and east of Douglas, Arizona, in Cochise County, is comprised of private land and land under the jurisdiction of the Arizona State Land Department. The State Land application number for the project is 29-98250; the noncollection survey was conducted under General Permit No. 89-68 issued by the Arizona State Museum (ASM) in Tucson. Legally, the project area is located in Cochise County on nine U.S.G.S. 7.5 Minute quadrangle maps: Leslie Canyon, Arizona (portions of Sections 13, 16-18, 20, 24, 25, and 36 in T21S, R27E and R28E, and Sections 1, 12, 13, and 24 in T22S, R27E and R28E, and Sections 16-18 and 20 in T22S, R28E); Pedregosa Mountains West, Arizona (portions of Sections 15, 16, 21, 22, 26-28, and 33-35 in T21S, R28E); Douglas NE, Arizona (portions of Sections 24, 25, and 36 in T22S, R27E, and Sections 1 and 12 in T23S, R27E, and Sections 7-9 in T23S, R28E); College Peaks, Arizona (portions of Sections 9, 10, and 13-15 in T23S, R28E, and Sections 17, 18, 20-22, and 27 in T23S, R29E); Cinder Hills, Arizona (portions of Sections 13, 18, and 24-27 in T23S, R29E, and Sections 28-30 and 34 in T23S, R30E, and Section 3 in T24S, R30E); San Bernardino Ranch, Arizona--Sonora (portions of Sections 2 and 11 in T24S, R29E, and Sections 3, 10, 11, and 15 in T24S, R30E); West of Guadalupe Canyon, Arizona--Sonora (portions of Sections 5-7 and 12 in T24S, R30E); Lazy J Ranch, Arizona (portions of Sections 12-14, 22, 23, 28, 29, 32, and 33 in T23S, R31E, and Sections 6 and 7 in T23S, R32E, and Sections 3-5 in T24S, R31E); and Guadalupe Spring, New Mexico--Arizona (portions of Section 32 in T22S, R32E, and Sections 5- 8 in T23S, R32E). The results of the records search at the ASM were positive; 15 previously recorded sites were located adjacent to or within the right-of-way. C&ES surveyed 100 percent of the right-of-way (Phases A through C). The archaeological teams walked the corridor in parallel transects spaced at 20-meter intervals. Located were 7 historic sites (AZ FF:6:20, AZ FF:6:21, AZ FF:10:19, AZ FF:11:4, AZ FF:11:69, AZ FF:11:70, and AZ FF:11:71), 13 prehistoric sites (AZ FF:6:22, AZ FF:11:17, AZ FF:11:37, AZ FF:11:72, AZ FF:11:73, AZ FF:11:74, AZ FF:11:75, AZ FF:11:76, AZ FF:11:77, AZ FF:11:78, AZ FF:11:79, AZ FF:11:80, and AZ FF:12:30), and 29 isolates. (A prehistoric site, AZ FF:12:27, was located adjacent to the right-of-way.) The cultural resources identified represent at least five cultures (Hispanic, Anglo, Archaic, Mogollon, and Salado). With the exception of AZ FF:6:22, all of the recorded sites are considered to be eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places based upon criterion "d". Management recommendations are for avoidance of all sites through project redesign, movement of the right-of-way, or protection measures. A testing program, including archival research, oral interviews, detailed mapping and photo-documentation, and final report(s) is recommended for any site that will be impacted either directly or indirectly by construction of the SSVEC transmission line. Based upon the results of the testing programs, data recovery is recommended at sites where warranted. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... Project Area Location ................................................................................................................ Environmental Setting .......3 Flora ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Fauna ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Soils .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Culture History ....... 8 Prior Research .............................................................................................................................. 13 Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 23 Results ............................................................................................................................................. 24 Phase A ....................................................................................................................................... 24 Sites ............................................................................................................................................ 25 Phase A Isolates ..................................................................................................................... 25 Phase B ........................................................................................................................................ 25 Sites ............................................................................................................................................ 26 Phase B Isolates ...................................................................................................................... 32 Phase C ......................................................................................................................................... 34 Sites ............................................................................................................................................ 34 Phase C Isolates ...................................................................................................................... 35 Phase C Alternate Right-of-Way .................................................................................... 35 Cultural Features Outside the Right-of-Way .................................................................. 35 Windmills and Cisterns ........................................................................................................ 35 Cottonwood Creek School .................................................................................................. 36 Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 36 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 39 AZ FF:6:21 ................................................................................................................................. 40 AZ FF:6:22 .................................................................................................................................. 40 AZ FF:10:19 ............................................................................................................................... 42 AZ FF:11:4 .................................................................................................................................. 42 AZ FF:11:17 ............................................................................................................................... 43 AZ FF:11:37 ............................................................................................................................... 43 AZ FF:11:69 ............................................................................................................................... 44 AZ FF:11:70 ............................................................................................................................... 44 AZ FF:11:71 ............................................................................................................................... 45 AZ FF:11:72 ............................................................................................................................... 46 AZ FF:11:73 ............................................................................................................................... 46 AZ FF:11:74 ............................................................................................................................... 47 111 Table of Contents (continued) AZ FF:11:75 ............................................................................................................................... 47 AZ FF:11:76 ..............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Santa Fe New Mexican, 02-02-1910 New Mexican Printing Company
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Santa Fe New Mexican, 1883-1913 New Mexico Historical Newspapers 2-2-1910 Santa Fe New Mexican, 02-02-1910 New Mexican Printing Company Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/sfnm_news Recommended Citation New Mexican Printing Company. "Santa Fe New Mexican, 02-02-1910." (1910). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/sfnm_news/130 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the New Mexico Historical Newspapers at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Fe New Mexican, 1883-1913 by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FF TT VOL. 48, SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO, WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, U)10 NO 302 WILL GAMP AI Ell I! MINERS UNI Fill DENVER lEH'SDEIi FISK Al ROBIN BILLJEPORIEQ 10 FR5IEITS TO NORWAY: TURNED 001 SON SUSPEND News That Will Greatly House Committee Favors Giv- Force of Gas Explosion in Big Storm Is Covering Colo- - Sixty Railroads Express Wil- - Seven Million Dollar Bank- - Please New Mexico Nat- ing President Authority Primero Workings Colo- rado Vith a Mantle of lingness to Arbitrate Wage ing House Could Not With- ional Guard to Withdraw Lands rado, Was Terrific Purest White Question, However stand Pressure 6,000,000 POWER PLANT ATTORNEYS FOR BALL1NGER PENETRATIfW THE MINE FI58ERHEN LQSETHEER LIVES 32,000 HENJBE AFFECTED COST OF LIVING IS BLAMED Examination for Census Enu-merato- rs Senator Nelson and Other Mem Blinding Snowstorm Raged Dur-- Bodies of Ten Washed Ashore Asked for Twenty to Twenty-- Had Underwritten Securities Will Be Held on bers Consider the Situation ing Funeral of Several of the on Lofoden Island and Forty Five per Cent Increase and That Were Shrinking in Saturday.
    [Show full text]
  • Availability of Additional Water for Chiricahua National Monument Cochise County, Arizona
    Availability of Additional Water for Chiricahua National Monument Cochise County, Arizona By PHILLIP W. JOHNSON HYDROLOGY OF THE PUBLIC DOMAIN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1475-H Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Pagre Abstract________________________________________________________ 209 Introduction. _____________________________________________________ 209 Geology..._______________________________________________ 211 Water resources___________________________________________________ 211 Surface flow__________________________________________________ 212 Springs and seeps____________________________________________ 212 Wells,_____________________________________________________ 213 Conclusions and suggestions ________________________________________ 214 Impoundment of surface flow __________________________________ 214 Development of springs and seeps.______________________________ 214 Deep test well_______________________________________________ 215 Test drilling in the alluvium._ _________________________________ 215 Selected references.._______________________________________________ 216 ILLUSTRATIONS Pa&e PLATE 17. Map of Chiricahua National Monument showing geology, wells, springs, seeps, and culture.________________ In pocket FIGURE
    [Show full text]
  • Dos Cabezas Mountains Proposed LWC Is Affected Primarily by the Forces of Nature and Appears Natural to the Average Visitor
    DOS CABEZAS MOUNTAINS LANDS WITH WILDERNESS CHARACTERISTICS PUBLIC LANDS CONTIGUOUS TO THE BLM’S DOS CABEZAS MOUNTAINS WILDERNESS IN THE NORTHERN CHIRICAHUA MOUNTAINS, ARIZONA A proposal report to the Bureau of Land Management, Safford Field Office, Arizona APRIL, 2016 Prepared by: Joseph M. Trudeau, Amber R. Fields, & Shannon Maitland Dos Cabezas Mountains Wilderness Contiguous Proposed LWC TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE: This Proposal was developed according to BLM Manual 6310 page 3 METHODS: The research approach to developing this citizens’ proposal page 5 Section 1: Overview of the Proposed Lands with Wilderness Characteristics Unit Introduction: Overview map showing unit location and boundaries page 8 • provides a brief description and labels for the units’ boundary Previous Wilderness Inventories: Map of former WSA’s or inventory unit’s page 9 • provides comparison between this and past wilderness inventories, and highlights new information Section 2: Documentation of Wilderness Characteristics The proposed LWC meets the minimum size criteria for roadless lands page 11 The proposed LWC is affected primarily by the forces of nature page 12 The proposed LWC provides outstanding opportunities for solitude and/or primitive and unconfined recreation page 16 A Sky Island Adventure: an essay and photographs by Steve Till page 20 MAP: Hiking Routes in the Dos Cabezas Mountains discussed in this report page 22 The proposed LWC has supplemental values that enhance the wilderness experience & deserve protection page 23 Conclusion: The proposed
    [Show full text]
  • Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands
    Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands David Gori, Gitanjali S. Bodner, Karla Sartor, Peter Warren and Steven Bassett September 2012 Animas Valley, New Mexico Photo: TNC Preferred Citation: Gori, D., G. S. Bodner, K. Sartor, P. Warren, and S. Bassett. 2012. Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands. Report prepared by The Nature Conservancy in New Mexico and Arizona. 85 p. i Executive Summary Sky Island grasslands of central and southern Arizona, southern New Mexico and northern Mexico form the “grassland seas” that surround small forested mountain ranges in the borderlands. Their unique biogeographical setting and the ecological gradients associated with “Sky Island mountains” add tremendous floral and faunal diversity to these grasslands and the region as a whole. Sky Island grasslands have undergone dramatic vegetation changes over the last 130 years including encroachment by shrubs, loss of perennial grass cover and spread of non-native species. Changes in grassland composition and structure have not occurred uniformly across the region and they are dynamic and ongoing. In 2009, The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) launched its Sky Island Grassland Initiative, a 10-year plan to protect and restore grasslands and embedded wetland and riparian habitats in the Sky Island region. The objective of this assessment is to identify a network of priority grassland landscapes where investment by the Foundation and others will yield the greatest returns in terms of restoring grassland health and recovering target wildlife species across the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiricahua National Monument Historic Designed Landscape Historic Name
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being nominated, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property Chiricahua National Monument Historic Designed Landscape historic name other name/site number Wonderland of Rocks; Rhyolite Park; The Pinnacles; Say Yahdesut “Point of Rocks” 2. Location street & number: Chiricahua National Monument (CHIR) 12856 E. Rhyolite Canyon Road _____not for publication city/town: Willcox___________________________________________________________ _X_ vicinity state: Arizona_____ code: AZ __________ county: Cochise_________ code: 003_____ zip code: 85643___ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ¨ nomination ¨ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places an meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ¨ meets ¨ does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Ku Chish (Formerly North Chiricahua) Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation [PW-05-03-D1-003]
    Ku Chish Potential Wilderness Evaluation Report Ku Chish (formerly North Chiricahua) Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation [PW-05-03-D1-003] Area Overview Size and Location: The Ku Chish Potential Wilderness Area encompasses 26,266 acres. This area is located in the Chiricahua Mountains, which is part of the Douglas Ranger District of the Coronado National Forest in southeastern Arizona (see Map 2 at the end of this document). The Ku Chish PWA is overlapped by 22,447 acres of the Chiricahua Inventoried Roadless Area, comprising 85 percent of the PWA. Vicinity, Surroundings and Access: The Ku Chish Potential Wilderness Area is approximately 100 miles southeast of Tucson, Arizona, within the Douglas Ranger District in the Cochise Head area at the northern end of the Chiricahua Mountains. There is one small incorporated community (Willcox) and several unincorporated communities (Dos Cabezas, Bowie, San Simon and Portal) near the northern end of the Chiricahua Mountains and the PWA. Interstate 10 connects the Tucson metropolitan area to Willcox, Bowie and San Simon. In addition, the Chiricahua National Monument and Fort Bowie National Historic Site are also located nearby. The primary motorized access route into and through the National Forest at the north end of the Chiricahua Mountains is Pinery Canyon Road (NFS Road 42). Pinery Canyon Road is a Cochise County- maintained road, except for the portion within the proclaimed Forest boundary. It is accessed from State Route 181 at the entrance to Chiricahua National Monument on the east side of the Chiricahua Mountains and from Portal, Arizona on the west side. From the south, North Fork Road (NFS Road 356) accesses the PWA; it provides motorized access that requires a high–clearance, four-wheel-drive vehicle to Indian Creek Trail (NFS Trail 253).
    [Show full text]
  • Ambient Groundwater Quality of Tlie Douglas Basin: an ADEQ 1995-1996 Baseline Study
    Ambient Groundwater Quality of tlie Douglas Basin: An ADEQ 1995-1996 Baseline Study I. Introduction »Ragstaff The Douglas Groundwater Basin (DGB) is located in southeastern Arizona (Figure 1). It is a picturesque broad alluvial valley surrounded by rugged mountain ranges. This factsheet is based on a study conducted in 1995- 1996 by the Arizona Department of Enviroimiental Quality (ADEQ) and Douglas summarizes a comprehensive regional Groundwater groundwater quality report (1). Basin The DGB was chosen for study for the following reasons: • Residents predominantly rely upon groundwater for their water needs. • There is a history of management decrees designed to increase groundwater sustainability (2). • The basin extends into Mexico, making groundwater issues an international concern. II. Background The DGB consists of the southern portion of the Sulphur Springs Valley, a northwest-southeast trending trough that extends through southeastern Arizona into Mexico. Covering 950 square miles, the DGB is roughly 15 miles wide and 35 miles long. The boundaries of the DGB include the Swisshelm (Figure 2), Pedregosa, and Perilla Mountains to the east, the Mule and Dragoon Mountains to the west, and a series of small ridges and buttes to * AguaPrieta the north (Figure 1). Although the Mexico DGB extends south hydrologically into Figure 1. Infrared satellite image of the Douglas Groundwater Basin (DGB) taken in June, 1993. Mexico, the international border serves Irrigated farmland is shown in bright red in the central parts of the basin, grasslands and mountain as the southern groundwater divide for areas appear in both blue and brown. The inset map shows the location of the DGB within Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiricahua National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Chiricahua National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/081 THIS PAGE: Close up of the many rhyolitic hoodoos within the Monument ON THE COVER: Scenic vista in Chiricahua NM NPS Photos by: Ron Kerbo Chiricahua National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/081 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 June 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Denver, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. Examples of the diverse array of reports published in this series include vital signs monitoring plans; "how to" resource management papers; proceedings of resource management workshops or conferences; annual reports of resource programs or divisions of the Natural Resource Program Center; resource action plans; fact sheets; and regularly-published newsletters.
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Ranch Houses of Southern Arizona 1663-1912
    Territorial ranch houses of southern Arizona 1863-1912 Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Stewart, Janet Ann, 1925- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 03:37:57 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/566373 TERRITORIAL RANCH HOUSES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA 1663-1912 by . Janet Ann Steivart A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ART In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS WITH A MAJOR IN ART HISTORY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 0 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial ful­ fillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permis­ sion for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Missing Linkages
    ARIZONA MISSING LINKAGES Galiuro – Pinaleño – Dos Cabezas Linkage Design Paul Beier, Emily Garding, Daniel Majka 2008 GALIURO – PINALEÑO – DOS CABEZAS LINKAGE DESIGN Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the help of many individuals. We thank Dr. Phil Rosen, Matt Good, Chasa O’Brien, Dr. Jason Marshal, Ted McKinney, Michael Robinson, Mitch Sternberg, Dr. Robert Harrison, and Taylor Edwards for parameterizing models for focal species and suggesting focal species. Catherine Wightman, Fenner Yarborough, Janet Lynn, Mylea Bayless, Andi Rogers, Mikele Painter, Valerie Horncastle, Matthew Johnson, Jeff Gagnon, Erica Nowak, Lee Luedeker, Allen Haden, Shaula Hedwall, Bill Broyles, Dale Turner, Natasha Kline, Thomas Skinner, David Brown, Jeff Servoss, Janice Pryzbyl, Tim Snow, Lisa Haynes, Don Swann, Trevor Hare, and Martin Lawrence helped identify focal species and species experts. Robert Shantz provided photos for many of the species accounts. Shawn Newell, Jeff Jenness, Megan Friggens, and Matt Clark, and Elissa Ostergaard provided helpful advice on analyses and reviewed portions of the results. Funding This project was funded by a grant from Arizona Game and Fish Department to Northern Arizona University. Recommended Citation Beier, P., E. Garding, and D. Majka. 2008. Arizona Missing Linkages: Galiuro-Pinaleño-Dos Cabezas Linkage Design. Report to Arizona Game and Fish Department. School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1910 Bullitt Pioneer Extracted from Microfilm by Edith Blissett
    Extracts of The Bullitt Pioneer PREFACE In March 2000, I began a project to extract an index of names published in the turn of the century editions of the Bullitt Pioneer Newspaper. Microfilm of these early newspapers was available at the Ridgeway Memorial Library in Shepherdsville. I first envisioned strictly an index of names only. After working through several editions I realized that the style and content were unique and I started over with the intent of using a line or two from the articles. Later, wanting to include even more of the content I started the project a third time including significant articles. Hundreds or thousands of hours later, I have this finished product. I have tried to include every piece of information that would be of interest to a genealogist or local historian, using "article", "etc" or "highlights only" for items not typed in its entirety, especially in wedding descriptions or flowery obituaries. Omitted are most state-wide or national political items. The images on the microfilm range from fair to completely unreadable. Many were faded, torn, wrinkled and stained. I can't help but wonder how many went through our famous Shepherdsville floods. The issues are scattered. Several years had only a few issues available. The spellings of names often varied with the author. I have no idea as to the correct spelling of many of the names. I typed them as they were printed. The quality of the images caused many questions. A smudge, wrinkle or hole created gaps. Ink-filled letter let to difficulty with e-a-o-c, u-n, i-l-t, R-B-H.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(S): T
    Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(s): T. H. Kearney Source: Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Oct., 1964), pp. 94-103 Published by: Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40022366 Accessed: 21/05/2010 20:43 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=anas. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science. http://www.jstor.org ARIZONA LOCALITIESOF INTEREST TO BOTANISTS Compiled by T.
    [Show full text]