Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands David Gori, Gitanjali S. Bodner, Karla Sartor, Peter Warren and Steven Bassett September 2012 Animas Valley, New Mexico Photo: TNC Preferred Citation: Gori, D., G. S. Bodner, K. Sartor, P. Warren, and S. Bassett. 2012. Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands. Report prepared by The Nature Conservancy in New Mexico and Arizona. 85 p. i Executive Summary Sky Island grasslands of central and southern Arizona, southern New Mexico and northern Mexico form the “grassland seas” that surround small forested mountain ranges in the borderlands. Their unique biogeographical setting and the ecological gradients associated with “Sky Island mountains” add tremendous floral and faunal diversity to these grasslands and the region as a whole. Sky Island grasslands have undergone dramatic vegetation changes over the last 130 years including encroachment by shrubs, loss of perennial grass cover and spread of non-native species. Changes in grassland composition and structure have not occurred uniformly across the region and they are dynamic and ongoing. In 2009, The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) launched its Sky Island Grassland Initiative, a 10-year plan to protect and restore grasslands and embedded wetland and riparian habitats in the Sky Island region. The objective of this assessment is to identify a network of priority grassland landscapes where investment by the Foundation and others will yield the greatest returns in terms of restoring grassland health and recovering target wildlife species across the region. As a first step in identifying priority landscapes, we integrated two recent assessments of grassland condition to characterize the historical extent and current condition of grasslands across the Sky Island region. These assessments—the Apache Highlands Grassland Assessment (AHGA) and the New Mexico Rangeland Assessment (REA)—used similar condition classes and an expert-based approach to map the spatial extent of grasslands by condition class. For this analysis, the two assessments were combined into one spatial dataset by grouping finer-scale REA condition classes up to AHGA classes. Five condition types or classes resulted from the integration: (1) no to low woody increase, native grassland; (2) medium woody increase, native grassland; (3) no to low woody increase, non-native grassland; (4) medium woody increase, non- native grassland; and (5) high wood increase, former grassland. The combined spatial data set does not have sufficient information to identify grasslands in Mexico outside of the Apache Highlands ecoregion. To represent these grasslands, we used the Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geographía land cover map which contains no information on current condition or spatial extent of former grasslands; these grasslands were classified as “undetermined”. Experts in the U.S. and Mexico identified 13,902,000 acres as current or former grassland which corresponds to almost half of the area we analyzed. Furthermore, grasslands were highly connected historically, allowing wide-ranging species, like bison, pronghorn and grassland birds, as well as species with more limited dispersal capabilities, like black-tailed prairie dogs, to move freely within and between these habitats. Only 2.6 million acres, or 19% of these grasslands, are still dominated by native grasses and remain relatively open and shrub free. Approximately 4.9 million acres, or 35%, have experienced more shrub encroachment but still fall into classes that are considered restorable with prescribed fire and other relatively cost-effective methods. However, shrub cover and associated soil erosion has exceeded a threshold on over 3.2 million acres, producing an irreversible type conversion from grassland to shrubland on almost one quarter of the historic grasslands and savannas in this region. The spread of non-native perennial grasses within grasslands has also been substantial. Boer lovegrass and, to a greater extent, Lehmann lovegrass are common on at least 1.5 million acres such that non-native grasslands with little to moderate woody increase comprise 11% of the area’s current and former grasslands. Implications of this ii spread are mixed, with some wildlife species more impacted than others. Native grasses remain present in many invaded areas, albeit at lower density. To assist in the identification and evaluation of priority Sky Island grasslands, we summarized existing information from a variety of sources on the distribution of sensitive grassland species and riparian-aquatic species that occur in wetland habitats embedded within grasslands which were identified as targets and priority species by NFWF and others. In addition, we summarized occurrence information for natural communities that have declined significantly over the last 100+ years due primarily to human impacts: ciénega wetlands, sacaton riparian grasslands, and sandy black grama grasslands. Occurrence records for grassland and riparian-aquatic sensitive species were obtained from the Natural Heritage Programs in Arizona and New Mexico. As a second step, we assembled several experts to both expand our understanding of grasslands across the region and to explicitly delineate priority grassland landscapes. Participants were asked to map areas they viewed as particularly promising for sustaining the region’s grasslands over the long term, drawing on their own knowledge and a variety of supporting information provided at the workshop. Spatial data sets provided to participants included the integrated grassland condition assessment described above, soil classifications, species occurrence locations, land management responsibility and protection status, and results of various groups’ efforts to identify priority conservation areas for other purposes. We seeded the discussion with suggested criteria for identifying, delineating, and evaluating these priority landscapes but participants were free to map as they saw fit. Suggested criteria included size of grassland blocks, ecological condition of those blocks, presence of embedded streams and wetlands and target wildlife species, fragmentation versus connectivity of grassland habitat, presence of intractable threats, and enabling conditions for long-term conservation success such as local community partnerships. Once polygons were drawn and met with group agreement, participants filled out a matrix of conservation value and feasibility for each. Criteria evaluated included many of the same ones used to inform the drawing of the polygons, but this exercise required participants to rate criteria for each site as low, medium, or high and, where necessary, explain those ratings. This group effort provided additional sources of information about distributions of target species and sensitive communities as well as enabling conditions for conservation. Participants identified twelve priority grassland landscapes (polygons), almost all containing substantial blocks of “high-quality grassland” that the combined grassland assessment had identified within the region (83% of overall acreage in native no to low woody increase classes), as well as substantial acreage of surrounding grassland patches deemed “restorable” (moderate woody increase). Landscapes differed in the amount and proportion of open intact grasslands within them. Four landscapes stand out as particularly noteworthy with over 150,000 acres of open intact grassland each: Upper San Pedro Mexico, Animas Valley-Sierra San Luis, Playas Valley-Janos Plain and Burro Cienega-Hachita landscapes. The 12 priority polygons also succeeded in capturing many of the target biological features associated with grasslands in the region. All but two patches of riparian sacaton grassland identified were included in the final polygons and ciénegas were well distributed in all but four of the priority landscapes. Looking at the occurrence of species of interest across these polygons iii revealed the value of the network as a whole. Some species like pronghorn and Chiricahua leopard frog (in embedded wetland habitats) are widespread, occurring in 10 out of 12 priority landscapes, while other targets occur in just one or two polygons. Of the 20 rare fish identified, 17 are found in three polygons or fewer, with most of these species living in just one or two stream systems each. Four landscapes are particularly notable in regard to native fish: San Bernardino Valley and Animas-Sierra San Luis with 7 and 9 species, respectively, of Yaqui drainage fish, and Empire-Cienega-Sonoita and Aravaipa-Muleshoe-Willcox with 10 and 11 species, respectively, of Gila drainage fish. A broader look at rare species in the region further demonstrated how well this network of polygons captured known locations for species dependent on grasslands or their embedded riparian habitats. Half of the species evaluated had >75% of their recorded locations falling inside these polygons. Less than a third of the species had the majority of their locations outside our network of polygons and only 1 species (with one occurrence) did not occur in any grassland polygon. Landscapes vary dramatically in land ownership/management patterns, as well as in protected status. Overall, private lands dominate the priority grassland landscapes. The degree to which these lands are managed for the benefit
Recommended publications
  • Chiricahua Leopard Frog (Rana Chiricahuensis)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Chiricahua Leopard Frog (Rana chiricahuensis) Final Recovery Plan April 2007 CHIRICAHUA LEOPARD FROG (Rana chiricahuensis) RECOVERY PLAN Southwest Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director, or Director, as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. Chiricahua Leopard Frog (Rana chiricahuensis) Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NM. 149 pp. + Appendices A-M. Additional copies may be obtained from: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Field Office Southwest Region 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 500 Gold Avenue, S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • By Douglas P. Klein with Plates by G.A. Abrams and P.L. Hill U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado
    U.S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY STRUCTURE OF THE BASINS AND RANGES, SOUTHWEST NEW MEXICO, AN INTERPRETATION OF SEISMIC VELOCITY SECTIONS by Douglas P. Klein with plates by G.A. Abrams and P.L. Hill U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado Open-file Report 95-506 1995 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. The use of trade, product, or firm names in this papers is for descriptive purposes only, and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. STRUCTURE OF THE BASINS AND RANGES, SOUTHWEST NEW MEXICO, AN INTERPRETATION OF SEISMIC VELOCITY SECTIONS by Douglas P. Klein CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................. 1 DEEP SEISMIC CRUSTAL STUDIES .................................. 4 SEISMIC REFRACTION DATA ....................................... 7 RELIABILITY OF VELOCITY STRUCTURE ............................. 9 CHARACTER OF THE SEISMIC VELOCITY SECTION ..................... 13 DRILL HOLE DATA ............................................... 16 BASIN DEPOSITS AND BEDROCK STRUCTURE .......................... 20 Line 1 - Playas Valley ................................... 21 Cowboy Rim caldera .................................. 23 Valley floor ........................................ 24 Line 2 - San Luis Valley through the Alamo Hueco Mountains ....................................... 25 San Luis Valley ..................................... 26 San Luis and Whitewater Mountains ................... 26 Southern
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to the Classic Literature Collection
    Your Guide to the Classic Literature Collection. Electronic texts for use with Kurzweil 1000 and Kurzweil 3000. Revised March 27, 2017. Your Guide to the Classic Literature Collection – March 22, 2017. © Kurzweil Education, a Cambium Learning Company. All rights reserved. Kurzweil 1000 and Kurzweil 3000 are trademarks of Kurzweil Education, a Cambium Learning Technologies Company. All other trademarks used herein are the properties of their respective owners and are used for identification purposes only. Part Number: 125516. UPC: 634171255169. 11 12 13 14 15 BNG 14 13 12 11 10. Printed in the United States of America. 1 Introduction Introduction Kurzweil Education is pleased to release the Classic Literature Collection. The Classic Literature Collection is a portable library of approximately 1,800 electronic texts, selected from public domain material available from Web sites such as www.gutenberg.net. You can easily access the contents from any of Kurzweil Education products: Kurzweil 1000™, Kurzweil 3000™ for the Apple® Macintosh® and Kurzweil 3000 for Microsoft® Windows®. The collection is also available from the Universal Library for Web License users on K3000+firefly. Some examples of the contents are: • Literary classics by Jane Austen, Geoffrey Chaucer, Joseph Conrad, Charles Dickens, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Hermann Hesse, Henry James, William Shakespeare, George Bernard Shaw, Leo Tolstoy and Oscar Wilde. • Children’s classics by L. Frank Baum, Brothers Grimm, Rudyard Kipling, Jack London, and Mark Twain. • Classic texts from Aristotle and Plato. • Scientific works such as Einstein’s “Relativity: The Special and General Theory.” • Reference materials, including world factbooks, famous speeches, history resources, and United States law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Altar Valley, Arizona, USA How Ranchers Have Shaped the West—And Continue to Do So
    A History of Working Landscapes: The Altar Valley, Arizona, USA How ranchers have shaped the West—and continue to do so. By Nathan F. Sayre pproaching rangelands as working landscapes be- Although relatively overlooked by scientists, agencies, and gins from the premise that people and the envi- environmentalists during the 20th century, the Altar Valley ronment shape each other over time. Sustainable has recently emerged as a focal point in the politics of conser- management is therefore not only an ecological but vation in Pima County, Arizona. Despite dramatic changes in Aalso a social process, strongly infl uenced by local histories of the structure and composition of vegetation and in watershed resource use, management, change, and learning. The case of function (see below), the area provides habitat to numerous the Altar Valley, Arizona, offers insights into how economics, listed threatened or endangered species. Compared to the range science, mental models, and the scale of decision mak- rest of eastern Pima County, the Altar Valley is also remark- ing have shaped ranchers and the landscape over time. In par- ably unfragmented by residential development, although the ticular, it provides empirical answers to important questions fringes of metropolitan Tucson (population approximately 1 facing range science today: How do scientifi c knowledge and million) reach right up to its northeastern edge. In conse- recommendations affect on-the-ground management? How quence, advocates of wildlife and open space conservation do ranchers weigh economic, ecological, and cultural goals are increasingly interested in the activities of the families against one another? What kinds of information do ranchers who own the valley’s major ranches.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Mineralization of the Oro Blanco Mining District, Santa Cruz County, Arizona
    Structure and mineralization of the Oro Blanco Mining District, Santa Cruz County, Arizona Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Knight, Louis Harold, 1943- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 20:13:55 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565224 STRUCTURE AND MINERALIZATION OF THE ORO BLANCO MINING DISTRICT, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, ARIZONA by * Louis Harold Knight, Jr. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 0 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Louis Harold Knight, Jr._______________________ entitled Structure and Mineralization of the Pro Blanco______ Mining District, Santa Cruz County, Arizona_________ be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy________________________________ a/akt/Z). m date ' After inspection of the final copy of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* SUtzo. /16? QJr zd /rtf C e f i, r --------- 7-------- /?S? This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate1s adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Availability of Additional Water for Chiricahua National Monument Cochise County, Arizona
    Availability of Additional Water for Chiricahua National Monument Cochise County, Arizona By PHILLIP W. JOHNSON HYDROLOGY OF THE PUBLIC DOMAIN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1475-H Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Pagre Abstract________________________________________________________ 209 Introduction. _____________________________________________________ 209 Geology..._______________________________________________ 211 Water resources___________________________________________________ 211 Surface flow__________________________________________________ 212 Springs and seeps____________________________________________ 212 Wells,_____________________________________________________ 213 Conclusions and suggestions ________________________________________ 214 Impoundment of surface flow __________________________________ 214 Development of springs and seeps.______________________________ 214 Deep test well_______________________________________________ 215 Test drilling in the alluvium._ _________________________________ 215 Selected references.._______________________________________________ 216 ILLUSTRATIONS Pa&e PLATE 17. Map of Chiricahua National Monument showing geology, wells, springs, seeps, and culture.________________ In pocket FIGURE
    [Show full text]
  • Sonoran Desert GEORGE GENTRY/FWSGEORGE the Sonoran Desert Has 2,000 Endemic Plant Species—More Than Anywhere Else in North America
    in the shadow of the wall: borderlands conservation hotspots on the line Borderlands Conservation Hotspot 2. Sonoran Desert GEORGE GENTRY/FWSGEORGE The Sonoran Desert has 2,000 endemic plant species—more than anywhere else in North America. hink deserts are wastelands? A visit to one of the national monuments or national wildlife refuges in the Sonoran Desert could change your mind. These borderlands are teeming with plants and animals impressively adapted to extreme conditions. T During your visit you might encounter a biologist, a volunteer or a local activist in awe of the place and dedicated to protecting it. The Sonoran Desert is so important to the natural heritage of the United States and Mexico that both countries are vested in conservation lands and programs and on a joint mission to preserve it. “A border wall,” says one conservation coalition leader, “harms our mission” (Campbell 2017). The Sonoran Desert is one of the largest intact wild areas mountains, where they find nesting cavities and swoop in the country, 100,387 square miles stretching across the between cactuses and trees to hunt lizards and other prey. southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. This Rare desert bighorn sheep stick to the steep, rocky slopes of desert is renowned for columnar cactuses like saguaro, organ isolated desert mountain ranges where they keep a watchful pipe and cardón. Lesser known is the fact that the Sonoran eye for predators. One of the most endangered mammals in Desert has more endemic plant species—2,000—than North America, Sonoran pronghorn still occasionally cross anywhere else in North America (Nabhan 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • WS Syllabus Template
    THE SKY ISLANDS PROGRAM: WILDLIFE CONSERVATION IN ACTION SPRING 2021: APRIL 8 – MAY 22 ACADEMIC SYLLABUS Faculty: Aletris Neils, PhD Contact Hours: We will all be in close contact, meeting every day throughout the course. There will be a number of “check-in days” where we will schedule student-faculty meetings. Students are encouraged to engage with faculty to discuss assignments or any other issues or concerns as needed. Class Meetings: The Wildlands Studies Sky Islands Program involves seven days per week of instruction and field research with little time off. Faculty and staff work directly with students 6-10+ hours a day and are available for tutorials and coursework discussion before and after scheduled activities. Typically, scheduled activities each day begin at 7am, with breaks for meals. Scheduled activities will include a variety of things including but not limited to lectures, discussions, hikes, and field research. Most evenings include scheduled activities such as guest lectures, structured study time, and workshops. When in the backcountry or at a field site, our activities may start as early as 4am or end as late as 11pm (e.g., for wildlife observation). Students should also expect to spend a few hours a day studying, writing in their journals, and completing readings. It is necessary for students to have a flexible mindset and to be able to accommodate a variety of class, activity, and independent study times. Course Credit: Students enrolled in a Wildlands Studies Program receive credit for three undergraduate courses. These three courses have distinct objectives and descriptions, and we integrate teaching and learning through formal learning situations (lectures and seminars), field work, field surveys and hands-on activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Dos Cabezas Mountains Proposed LWC Is Affected Primarily by the Forces of Nature and Appears Natural to the Average Visitor
    DOS CABEZAS MOUNTAINS LANDS WITH WILDERNESS CHARACTERISTICS PUBLIC LANDS CONTIGUOUS TO THE BLM’S DOS CABEZAS MOUNTAINS WILDERNESS IN THE NORTHERN CHIRICAHUA MOUNTAINS, ARIZONA A proposal report to the Bureau of Land Management, Safford Field Office, Arizona APRIL, 2016 Prepared by: Joseph M. Trudeau, Amber R. Fields, & Shannon Maitland Dos Cabezas Mountains Wilderness Contiguous Proposed LWC TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE: This Proposal was developed according to BLM Manual 6310 page 3 METHODS: The research approach to developing this citizens’ proposal page 5 Section 1: Overview of the Proposed Lands with Wilderness Characteristics Unit Introduction: Overview map showing unit location and boundaries page 8 • provides a brief description and labels for the units’ boundary Previous Wilderness Inventories: Map of former WSA’s or inventory unit’s page 9 • provides comparison between this and past wilderness inventories, and highlights new information Section 2: Documentation of Wilderness Characteristics The proposed LWC meets the minimum size criteria for roadless lands page 11 The proposed LWC is affected primarily by the forces of nature page 12 The proposed LWC provides outstanding opportunities for solitude and/or primitive and unconfined recreation page 16 A Sky Island Adventure: an essay and photographs by Steve Till page 20 MAP: Hiking Routes in the Dos Cabezas Mountains discussed in this report page 22 The proposed LWC has supplemental values that enhance the wilderness experience & deserve protection page 23 Conclusion: The proposed
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii PREFACE xiii SYNOPSIS xvii GLOSSARY xix A WORD ABOUT SYNTAX IN THIS VOLUME xxiii ABBREVIATIONS xxv BIBLIOGRAPHIA BAUMIANA 1 BOOKS OF NON-FICTION AND FANTASY 3 The Book of the Hamburgs 3 Mother Goose in Prose 5 By the Candelabra’s Glare 13 Father Goose: His Book 19 The Songs of Father Goose 27 The Army Alphabet 31 The Navy Alphabet 33 A New Wonderland 35 The Art of Decorating Dry Goods Windows and Interiors 38 American Fairy Tales 45 Dot and Tot of Merryland 48 The Master Key 54 The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus 59 The Enchanted Island of Yew 67 The Magical Monarch of Mo 73 The Woggle-Bug Book 82 Queen Zixi of Ix 85 John Dough and the Cherub 90 Father Goose’s Year Book 96 Baum’s American Fairy Tales 98 L. Frank Baum’s Juvenile Speaker 101 The Daring Twins 103 The Sea Fairies 107 Phoebe Daring 113 Sky Island 116 Baum’s Own Book for Children 121 The Snuggle Tales and The Oz-Man Tales 124 Little Bun Rabbit 125 Once Upon a Time 128 The Yellow Hen 131 The Magic Cloak 134 Jack Pumpkinhead 137 The Gingerbread Man 139 x BIBLIOGRAPHIA PSEUDONYMIANA 141 PSEUDONYMOUS BOOKS OF FICTION AND FANTASY 143 SCHUYLER STAUNTON 147 The Fate of a Crown 147 Daughters of Destiny 154 LAURA BANCROFT 158 The Twinkle Tales Series 158 Mr. Woodchuck 158 Bandit Jim Crow 162 Prairie-Dog Town 165 Prince Mud-Turtle 169 Sugar-Loaf Mountain 173 Twinkle’s Enchantment 176 The Twinkle Tales – Continued 179 Policeman Bluejay 179 Babes in Birdland 181 Twinkle and Chubbins 185 SUZANNE METCALF 188 Annabel 188 EDITH VAN DYNE 193 The Aunt Jane’s Nieces Series 193 Binding and Dust Jacket Formats 193 Aunt Jane’s Nieces 200 Aunt Jane’s Nieces Abroad 209 Aunt Jane’s Nieces at Millville 217 Aunt Jane’s Nieces at Work 224 Aunt Jane’s Nieces in Society 230 Aunt Jane’s Nieces and Uncle John 236 Aunt Jane’s Nieces on Vacation 241 Aunt Jane’s Nieces on the Ranch 246 Aunt Jane’s Nieces Out West 250 Aunt Jane’s Nieces in the Red Cross 254 The Flying Girl Series 258 The Flying Girl 258 The Flying Girl and Her Chum 262 The Bluebird Books, a.k.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Water, Summer 2008
    Restoring Connections Vol. 11 Issue 2 Summer 2008 Newsletter of the Sky Island Alliance In this issue: A River Runs Beneath It by Randy Serraglio 4 Time and the Aquifer: Models and Long-term Thinking Water… by Julia Fonseca 5 Street and Public Rights-of-Way: Community Corridors of Heat & Dehydration OR Green Belts of Coolness & Rehydration by Brad Lancaster 6 A New Path for Water Use by Melissa Lamberton 7 The Power of Water by Janice Przybyl 8 Our special pull-out section on Ciénegas Monitoring Water with Remote Cameras by Sergio Avila 9 Waste Water / Holy Water by Ken Lamberton 10 Coyote Wells by Julia Fonseca 12 Finding Water in the Desert by Gary Williams 12 H2Oly Stories by Doug Bland 13 Restaurant Review: The Adobe Café & Bakery by Mary Rakestraw 14 Volunteers Make It Happen Rio Saracachi at Rancho Agua Fria in Sonora. by Sarah Williams 16 From the Director’s Desk: Swimming Holes and Groundwater by Matt Skroch, Executive Director Rivers and springs have been used to our several decades, or centuries, the water table will agricultural advantage for 12,000 years here, once again seep upwards to ground level, and though unsustainable groundwater mining is a those low points on the landscape we call rivers relatively new phenomena. We’ve discovered will flow once again. other temporary ways around the problem of increasing water scarcity — billions of dollars Either choice will eventually lead nature back to spent to pump water uphill for 330 miles being better days. The difference being that one choice Few experiences compare to the exhilaration of one spectacular example.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Southline Transmission Line Project
    WESTERN Proposed Southline Transmission Line Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Draft Resource Management Plan Amendment Volume 4 of 4 BLM/NM/PL-14-01-1610 · DOE/EIS-0474 March 2014 BLM MISSION STATEMENT The Bureau of Land Management is responsible for stewardship of our public lands. The BLM is committed to manage, protect, and improve these lands in a manner to serve the needs of the American people. Management is based upon the principles of multiple use and sustained yield of our Nation’s resources within the framework of environmental responsibility and scientific technology. These resources include recreation, rangelands, timber, minerals, watershed, fish and wildlife habitat, wilderness, air, and scenic quality, as well as scientific and cultural values. WESTERN MISSION STATEMENT Western Area Power Administration’s mission is to market and deliver reliable, renewable, cost-based hydroelectric power and related services. Southline Transmission Line Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Draft Resource Management Plan Amendment 1 VOLUME 4 CONTENTS 2 3 APPENDICES 4 5 H Previous Cultural Surveys in the Analysis Area ............................................................................. H-1 6 I Final Key Observation Points and Visual Contrast Rating Worksheets ...........................................I-1 7 J BLM Land Use Authorizations ........................................................................................................ J-1 8 K Visual Simulations .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]