WS Syllabus Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WS Syllabus Template THE SKY ISLANDS PROGRAM: WILDLIFE CONSERVATION IN ACTION SPRING 2021: APRIL 8 – MAY 22 ACADEMIC SYLLABUS Faculty: Aletris Neils, PhD Contact Hours: We will all be in close contact, meeting every day throughout the course. There will be a number of “check-in days” where we will schedule student-faculty meetings. Students are encouraged to engage with faculty to discuss assignments or any other issues or concerns as needed. Class Meetings: The Wildlands Studies Sky Islands Program involves seven days per week of instruction and field research with little time off. Faculty and staff work directly with students 6-10+ hours a day and are available for tutorials and coursework discussion before and after scheduled activities. Typically, scheduled activities each day begin at 7am, with breaks for meals. Scheduled activities will include a variety of things including but not limited to lectures, discussions, hikes, and field research. Most evenings include scheduled activities such as guest lectures, structured study time, and workshops. When in the backcountry or at a field site, our activities may start as early as 4am or end as late as 11pm (e.g., for wildlife observation). Students should also expect to spend a few hours a day studying, writing in their journals, and completing readings. It is necessary for students to have a flexible mindset and to be able to accommodate a variety of class, activity, and independent study times. Course Credit: Students enrolled in a Wildlands Studies Program receive credit for three undergraduate courses. These three courses have distinct objectives and descriptions, and we integrate teaching and learning through formal learning situations (lectures and seminars), field work, field surveys and hands-on activities. Academic credit is provided by Western Washington University. Extended descriptions follow in the course description section of this syllabus. 1. ESCI 437A, Environmental Wildlands Studies (5 quarter units / 3.35 semester credits) – Field study of the ecology, geology, and environmental challenges of our study region, including the role of human interactions. 2. ESCI 437B, Environmental Field Survey (5 quarter units / 3.35 semester credits) – Study and application of field surveys, sampling methodologies, data management, including on-site data collection, assessment, and analysis. 3. ESCI 437C, Wildlands Environment and Culture (5 quarter units / 3.35 semester credits) – Study of social-ecological systems, drawing on locally relevant cultural perspectives and historic and present-day human relationships with the landscape, the environment, and wildlife. Includes group dialogue and personal reflection to track one’s own learning. Readings: A Course Reader has been established for this program and will be provided to students in advance of the program or upon arrival. Readings include selections from academic primary literature, technical reports, book chapters, Federal Register documents, environmental impact assessments and planning documents. Field guides and textbooks supplement our field activities and are an integral part of our program. We will carry a shared reference library of these on all activities and backcountry field studies. Required texts: These books are required for the Sky Islands Program: 1. Leopold, A. 2020. A Sand County Almanac: And Sketches Here and There. Oxford University Press. 2. Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum. 2015. A Natural History of the Sonoran Desert. University of California Press. 1 These books can be purchased at bookstores or at various online retailers for under $30 (SecondSale and other sites typically carry them used). There are older versions of both books available, however please get these newer versions so we are all reading the same accounts. You may choose to bring along a Kindle or other e-Reader, which will save space and weight in your pack. However, please be aware that electronics may NOT be reliably recharged at most of our field sites and are also prone to failure in our very dusty field conditions. If you do bring an e-Reader, it is up to you to make sure it is sufficiently charged and protected from the elements; a failed electronic device is no excuse to miss readings. *Please note: Students should read Chapters 1-11 of A Natural History of the Sonoran Desert BEFORE arriving in Tucson; there will be a quiz covering this material in the first days of the course. Contents of this Syllabus: I. Program Overview & Outline II. Learning Objectives III. Course Descriptions IV. Assessment V. Grading Scheme VI. General Reminders VII. Academic Schedule & Course Content VIII. Reading List I. Program Overview The Sky Islands program introduces students to the flora, fauna and conservation challenges of the Madrean Sky Islands’ diverse ecosystems. The Madrean Sky Islands, or ‘mountain islands’, are surrounded by ‘desert seas’, forming a geological chain that connects the northern end of the Sierra Madre Occidental from Mexico with the southern Colorado Plateau. The sky islands are well-known for their incredible variety of unique habitats and rich flora and fauna, and we will investigate the natural and anthropogenic processes that threaten these wildlife populations, explore and participate in on-the-ground conservation activities, and analyze the ecological and community impacts of government policy, resource management practices, and development activities. We will explore the Sky Islands by road and foot as we interact with threatened and endangered species and their habitats and gain skills in conducting field studies. We hope to do this in the company of local biologists, land managers, conservation practitioners, researchers, industry representatives and community members, but we are also prepared to study and learn as an independent team if needed. Participants will gain experience, skills, and understanding in three inter-related academic domains. These include: 1) Field research methods through a hands-on introduction to field methods for biological research regarding ecology, natural history, and conservation; 2) Ecology, conservation, natural resource management, and sustainable development in the Sky Island regions, and; 3) Culture and its environmental impact including an exploration of indigenous history and current issues with particular attention to relationships between society and the natural environment. Our learning methods will be experiential and academic. We will learn through engagement with people, places, plants, and animals, as well as through academic means such as lectures, readings, and discussions. Our learning will be both traditional and communal, with each team member striving to bring new insights to the group and analysis of wide- ranging experiences. The Madrean Sky Islands represents the place where the southern extent of the Rocky Mountains to the north blends with the northern extent of the Sierra Madres of Mexico. It is the place where temperate species such as grizzly bears and wolves once mingled with neotropical predators such as jaguars and ocelots, and in some cases still do. With more isolated mountain peaks than any other state, Arizona’s active geologic history has played a large role in creating the rich ecological diversity found across the southwest. Arizona hosts an enormous diversity of species, many of which are found nowhere else in the United States and some with home ranges that span the international border. Unfortunately, the state’s economic interests, and the country’s national security interests, are very often at odds with this incredible 2 natural splendor. Throughout our program, we will explore the complex interface of human-wildlife coexistence and balancing economic priorities with wildlife conservation. We will develop skills needed to conduct scientific research and will directly participate in wildlife conservation. When we investigate the Mexican wolf reintroduction program and visit the famous ‘Escudilla Mountain’ that once served as the castle for the last grizzly in Arizona, we will experience the difference between natural carrying capacities and social carrying capacities and how managers must consider both. The Sky Islands are also the perfect setting to collectively study island ecosystems, the impacts of land management and the effects of climate change. While some sky islands serve as refugia for boreal species stranded by warming climates since the last glacial period, others host localized populations of plants and animals that tend towards speciation, similar to oceanic islands such as the Galápagos Islands of Ecuador. The program is guaranteed to provide students with a deep understanding of the Sky Island landscape, the unique challenges faced by this region, and actions that can be taken to solve complex, environmental issues. Finally, we will look closely at the interrelated lives of wildlife and the region’s human residents. As we explore what is being done throughout the southwest to protect and restore wildlife communities and the habitats they rely on, these lessons gain real-world context as we review the history of use and current political agenda. We hope to deepen this study by engaging local communities, Tribal members and state officials to gain understandings of the impacts of wildlife management on the individual, local, and state-wide residents. We will discuss the effectiveness of current policies and contemplate options to protect wildlife in the region, while balancing cultural and economic interests. Team Activities & Program Itinerary
Recommended publications
  • The Altar Valley, Arizona, USA How Ranchers Have Shaped the West—And Continue to Do So
    A History of Working Landscapes: The Altar Valley, Arizona, USA How ranchers have shaped the West—and continue to do so. By Nathan F. Sayre pproaching rangelands as working landscapes be- Although relatively overlooked by scientists, agencies, and gins from the premise that people and the envi- environmentalists during the 20th century, the Altar Valley ronment shape each other over time. Sustainable has recently emerged as a focal point in the politics of conser- management is therefore not only an ecological but vation in Pima County, Arizona. Despite dramatic changes in Aalso a social process, strongly infl uenced by local histories of the structure and composition of vegetation and in watershed resource use, management, change, and learning. The case of function (see below), the area provides habitat to numerous the Altar Valley, Arizona, offers insights into how economics, listed threatened or endangered species. Compared to the range science, mental models, and the scale of decision mak- rest of eastern Pima County, the Altar Valley is also remark- ing have shaped ranchers and the landscape over time. In par- ably unfragmented by residential development, although the ticular, it provides empirical answers to important questions fringes of metropolitan Tucson (population approximately 1 facing range science today: How do scientifi c knowledge and million) reach right up to its northeastern edge. In conse- recommendations affect on-the-ground management? How quence, advocates of wildlife and open space conservation do ranchers weigh economic, ecological, and cultural goals are increasingly interested in the activities of the families against one another? What kinds of information do ranchers who own the valley’s major ranches.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Mineralization of the Oro Blanco Mining District, Santa Cruz County, Arizona
    Structure and mineralization of the Oro Blanco Mining District, Santa Cruz County, Arizona Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Knight, Louis Harold, 1943- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 20:13:55 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565224 STRUCTURE AND MINERALIZATION OF THE ORO BLANCO MINING DISTRICT, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, ARIZONA by * Louis Harold Knight, Jr. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 0 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Louis Harold Knight, Jr._______________________ entitled Structure and Mineralization of the Pro Blanco______ Mining District, Santa Cruz County, Arizona_________ be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy________________________________ a/akt/Z). m date ' After inspection of the final copy of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* SUtzo. /16? QJr zd /rtf C e f i, r --------- 7-------- /?S? This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate1s adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonoran Desert GEORGE GENTRY/FWSGEORGE the Sonoran Desert Has 2,000 Endemic Plant Species—More Than Anywhere Else in North America
    in the shadow of the wall: borderlands conservation hotspots on the line Borderlands Conservation Hotspot 2. Sonoran Desert GEORGE GENTRY/FWSGEORGE The Sonoran Desert has 2,000 endemic plant species—more than anywhere else in North America. hink deserts are wastelands? A visit to one of the national monuments or national wildlife refuges in the Sonoran Desert could change your mind. These borderlands are teeming with plants and animals impressively adapted to extreme conditions. T During your visit you might encounter a biologist, a volunteer or a local activist in awe of the place and dedicated to protecting it. The Sonoran Desert is so important to the natural heritage of the United States and Mexico that both countries are vested in conservation lands and programs and on a joint mission to preserve it. “A border wall,” says one conservation coalition leader, “harms our mission” (Campbell 2017). The Sonoran Desert is one of the largest intact wild areas mountains, where they find nesting cavities and swoop in the country, 100,387 square miles stretching across the between cactuses and trees to hunt lizards and other prey. southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. This Rare desert bighorn sheep stick to the steep, rocky slopes of desert is renowned for columnar cactuses like saguaro, organ isolated desert mountain ranges where they keep a watchful pipe and cardón. Lesser known is the fact that the Sonoran eye for predators. One of the most endangered mammals in Desert has more endemic plant species—2,000—than North America, Sonoran pronghorn still occasionally cross anywhere else in North America (Nabhan 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands
    Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands David Gori, Gitanjali S. Bodner, Karla Sartor, Peter Warren and Steven Bassett September 2012 Animas Valley, New Mexico Photo: TNC Preferred Citation: Gori, D., G. S. Bodner, K. Sartor, P. Warren, and S. Bassett. 2012. Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands. Report prepared by The Nature Conservancy in New Mexico and Arizona. 85 p. i Executive Summary Sky Island grasslands of central and southern Arizona, southern New Mexico and northern Mexico form the “grassland seas” that surround small forested mountain ranges in the borderlands. Their unique biogeographical setting and the ecological gradients associated with “Sky Island mountains” add tremendous floral and faunal diversity to these grasslands and the region as a whole. Sky Island grasslands have undergone dramatic vegetation changes over the last 130 years including encroachment by shrubs, loss of perennial grass cover and spread of non-native species. Changes in grassland composition and structure have not occurred uniformly across the region and they are dynamic and ongoing. In 2009, The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) launched its Sky Island Grassland Initiative, a 10-year plan to protect and restore grasslands and embedded wetland and riparian habitats in the Sky Island region. The objective of this assessment is to identify a network of priority grassland landscapes where investment by the Foundation and others will yield the greatest returns in terms of restoring grassland health and recovering target wildlife species across the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest
    CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST FIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN Reviewed and Updated by _/s/ Chris Stetson ___________ Date __5/18/10 __________ Coronado Fire Management Plan Interagency Federal fire policy requires that every area with burnable vegetation must have a Fire Management Plan (FMP). This FMP provides information concerning the fire process for the Coronado National Forest and compiles guidance from existing sources such as but not limited to, the Coronado National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP), national policy, and national and regional directives. The potential consequences to firefighter and public safety and welfare, natural and cultural resources, and values to be protected help determine the management response to wildfire. Firefighter and public safety are the first consideration and are always the priority during every response to wildfire. The following chapters discuss broad forest and specific Fire Management Unit (FMU) characteristics and guidance. Chapter 1 introduces the area covered by the FMP, includes a map of the Coronado National Forest, addresses the agencies involved, and states why the forest is developing the FMP. Chapter 2 establishes the link between higher-level planning documents, legislation, and policies and the actions described in FMP. Chapter 3 articulates specific goals, objectives, standards, guidelines, and/or desired future condition(s), as established in the forest’s LRMP, which apply to all the forest’s FMUs and those that are unique to the forest’s individual FMUs. Page 1 of 30 Coronado Fire Management Plan Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION The Coronado National Forest developed this FMP as a decision support tool to help fire personnel and decision makers determine the response to an unplanned ignition.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Keystone Peak Prescribed Burn Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-AZ-G020-2015-0009-EA 1 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Decision to be Made .............................................................................................................................. 11 1.4 Conformance with Land Use Plan .......................................................................................................... 11 1.5 Scoping and Issues ................................................................................................................................ 12 1.5.1 Internal Scoping ................................................................................................................................ 12 1.5.2 External Scoping ............................................................................................................................... 12 1.5.3 Issues Identified ................................................................................................................................ 12 2 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Appraisal of the Ground Water Resources of Avra and Altar Valleys
    WATER-RESOURCES REPORT NUMBER TWENTY-FIVE ARIZONA STATE LAND DEPARTMENT OBED M. LASSEN, COMMISSIONER AN APPRAISAL OF THE GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF AVRA AND ALTAR VALLEYS PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA BY NATALIE D. WHITE WG. MATLOCK AND H.C. SCHWALEN I PREPARED BY THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PHOENIX, ARIZONA UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FEBRUARY 1966 AND THE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA "Water Rights AdjlJdiCll\ion Team Civil Division Attorney Generars Office: CONTENTS Page Abstract ------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction ---------------------------------------------- 3 Location and extent of the area ------------------------- 3 History of agricultural development--------------------- 9 Purpose and scope of the study ------------------------- 10 Previous investigations -------------------------------- 12 Acknowledgments and personnel ------------------------ 13 The geohydrologic system ---------------------------------- 13 Climat.e -------------------------- - --- - -- - ------- - - - -- 14 Geologic setting -------------------------------------- 16 Surface water----------------------------------------- 19 Ground water-occurrence and movement --------------- 19 Chemical quality of the ground water -------------------- 27 Hydrologic characteristics of the aquifer ---------------- - --- 28 Transmissibility determined from well-data analysis -- - -- 29 Transmissibility determined from aquifer tests --- - ------ 30 Storage coefficient determined from analysis of the effects of ground-water withdrawal
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Border
    IN THE SHADOW OF THE WALL FACT CONSERVATION HOTSPOTS AT RISK SHEET ON THE ARIZONA BORDER THE 2,000-MILE U.S.-MEXICO BORDER PASSES through several conservation hotspots, including two in Arizona, the Sonoran Desert and the Sky Islands. These are areas important to endangered and threatened species and other wildlife and in which the United States and Mexico have significant investments in conservation lands and collaborative projects. Extending the border wall in Arizona would have devastating consequences: SHIPBAUGH BOB © • Further imperil already rare, endangered and threatened Jaguars from Mexico recently started venturing into Arizona, This cross-border movement is essential to the recovery of a species and wildlife habitat in the United States and U.S. population. Mexico. • Make it impossible to maintain the habitat connectivity “ If the wall is built, it’s all over for necessary for healthy cross-border populations of the jaguar in the United States.” Mexican wolves, jaguars, bighorn sheep, ocelots and other species. —Gooch Goodwin, Patagonia Area Resource Alliance • Waste billions of taxpayer dollars that could otherwise be spent on conservation or other worthwhile endeavors. more than $4 million to improving grazing lands to the • Hurt local economies dependent on ecotourism and benefit the watershed and native species. outdoor recreation. • The Mexico Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife • Stymie bilateral efforts essential for successful works with Mexico’s Secretariat of Environment and borderlands conservation. Natural Resources and other partners on both sides of the border to monitor, protect and recover at-risk species like the Chiricahua leopard frog, flat-tailed horned Conservation lands and collaborations on the line lizard, Sonoyta mud turtle, lesser long-nosed bat, cactus In the Sonoran Desert… ferruginous pygmy-owl and Sonoran pronghorn.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Land Use This Section Examines Land Ownership and Use Within the Six Counties Surrounding the Coronado National Forest (CNF)
    5. Land use This section examines land ownership and use within the six counties surrounding the Coronado National Forest (CNF). Land ownership and use are both variables which can significantly influence interaction between forests and surrounding communities. Regional development patterns and major land use vary from county to county, reflecting differences in climate, topography, ownership, and other cultural, social, and economic trends. Individual counties must attend to a range of land use issues including, but not limited to, water quality and availability, logging and mining activity, agricultural and recreational lands, access to state and federal land, transition of rangelands, open space preservation, and residential sprawl (Northern Economics 2002). Collected land use and ownership data reveal that the area of assessment for the CNF contains a relatively high percentage of private and State Trust land, both of which stand to have a considerable impact on future forest planning. Santa Cruz County is also notable for the amount of land managed by the USDA Forest Service (52.7%). Each of these factors contributes to a land use policy environment that is increasingly focused on the sustainability of urban development in the face of increasing calls for the preservation of open space. The proximity of private parcels and forest lands has also contributed to a number of significant land exchanges involving the CNF within the last twenty years. 5.1 Historical context and land use patterns Since the federal government first began designating public-trust land in the late nineteenth century, the amount of national forest land in Arizona has remained remarkably steady.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonorathe Archaeology of 3 the Archaeology of Sonora,Randall H
    ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST SUMMER 2016 A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF ARCHAEOLOGYmagazine SOUTHWEST VOLUME 30 | NUMBER 3 SonoraThe Archaeology of 3 The Archaeology of Sonora, Randall H. McGuire and Elisa Villalpando ISSUE EDITORS: 6 In Brief: México's National Institute of Anthropology and History, Randall H. McGuire and Elisa Villalpando Elisa Villalpando 7 First Sonorans, Guadalupe Sánchez and Vance T. Holliday 8 Archaic Sonora, John Carpenter, Guadalupe Sánchez, and ONLINE EXCLUSIVES: Ismael Sánchez-Morales For additional references and links, 9 Sonora’s Early Farmers, John Carpenter, Elisa Villalpando, and visit our website at: Guadalupe Sánchez www.archaeologysouthwest.org/asw30-3 10 In Brief: La Playa and Las Capas, R. Jane Sliva Cover image: A monsoon rainshower descends 11 Sierra Alta Communities, Júpiter Martínez Ramírez on Cerro de Trincheras as evening sunlight floods in from the west. In this low oblique ae- 13 rial view to the southeast, no modern structures The Sahuaripa Valley, John Carpenter and Guadalupe Sánchez are visible, yet the ancient stone terraces visibly striate the flanks of the main hill. © Adriel 14 The Moctezuma Valley, Matthew Pailes Heisey 16 The Ónavas Valley, Cristina García-Moreno and James T. Watson 18 The Trincheras Tradition, Randall H. McGuire and Elisa Villalpando 20 Established by William H. Doelle in memory of A Closer Look: Women on the Move, Tanya Chiykowski his mother, the June Harper Doelle Endowment inside this issue fund supports the publication of Archaeology 22 Transformation by Fire, Jessica I. Cerezo-Román Southwest Magazine and other public outreach programs. 23 Death, Memorial, and Remembrance in Sonora, James T. Watson Contact Linda Pierce at (520)882-6946, ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(S): T
    Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(s): T. H. Kearney Source: Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Oct., 1964), pp. 94-103 Published by: Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40022366 Accessed: 21/05/2010 20:43 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=anas. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science. http://www.jstor.org ARIZONA LOCALITIESOF INTEREST TO BOTANISTS Compiled by T.
    [Show full text]
  • (Sbinet) Tucson West Tower Project, Ajo, Tucson, Casa Grande, Nogales, and Sonoita Stations Area of Operation, U.S
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 In Reply Refer To: September 4, 2008 AESO/SE 22410-2008-F-0373 Mr. John Santo Acting Program Manager, SBInet U.S. Department of Homeland Security SBInet Program Management Office U.S. Customs and Border Protection 1300 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, D.C. 20229 RE: Biological Opinion on Secure Border Initiative (SBInet) Tucson West Tower Project, Ajo, Tucson, Casa Grande, Nogales, and Sonoita Stations Area of Operation, U.S. Border Patrol, Tucson Sector, Arizona Dear Mr. Santo: Thank you for your request for formal consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544), as amended (Act). Your request was dated June 19, 2008, and received by us on June 23, 2008. Effects determinations were clarified for a number of species in a June 26, 2008, electronic mail from Glenn Bixler, Department of Homeland Security (DHS). At issue are impacts that may result from the proposed SBInet Tucson West Tower Project (proposed action) located in Maricopa, Pinal, Pima, Cochise, and Santa Cruz counties, Arizona. The proposed action may affect the Chiricahua leopard frog (Lithobates chiricahuensis), Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) and critical habitat, jaguar (Panthera onca), lesser long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris yerbabuenae), and Pima pineapple cactus (Coryphantha scheeri var robustispina). Your agency requested our concurrence that the proposed action may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis occidentalis occidentalis), Sonora chub (Gila ditaenia) and critical habitat, Sonoran tiger salamander (Ambystoma mavortium stebbinsi), masked bobwhite (Colinus virginianus ridgewayi), ocelot (Leopardus pardalis), and Huachuca water umbel (Lilaeopsis schaffneriana recurva) and critical habitat.
    [Show full text]