DOCSLIB.ORG

Ana Annual Report 2016 - 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ana Annual Report 2016 - 2017 Administration de la Navigation Aérienne (ANA) ANA ANNUAL REPORT 2016 - 2017 Edition: 1.0 August 2017 Administration de la Navigation Aérienne (ANA) 2 ANNUAL REPORT 2016 - 2017 Page left blank Edition 1.0 Administration de la Navigation Aérienne (ANA) 4 ANNUAL REPORT 2016 - 2017 Page left blank Edition 1.0 Administration de la Navigation Aérienne (ANA) 5 ANNUAL REPORT 2016 - 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 10 PERFORMANCE 2016 ......................................................................................................................... 12 PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK ......................................................................................................... 12 ANS RESULTS 2016 ............................................................................................................................ 12 SAFETY PERFORMANCE ................................................................................................................... 16 EU SAFETY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS & TARGETS .............................................................................. 16 SAFETY WORK ...................................................................................................................................... 17 ANNUAL SAFETY PLAN .......................................................................................................................... 17 ESSIP - SAFETY OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE 2016 REPORTING CYCLE ....................................... 18 EFFORTS TO INCREASE SAFETY COMPETENCE AND PERFORMANCE ......................................................... 18 ATC PERFORMANCE .......................................................................................................................... 20 STRATEGIC INITIATIVES AND PROJECTS .................................................................................................. 20 SAFETY KPI (SAF) - ATM GROUND ...................................................................................................... 20 CAPACITY (CAP).................................................................................................................................. 21 AIRPORT DELAY (TAXI-OUT-TIME) .......................................................................................................... 21 CAP & ENVIRONMENT (ENV) ............................................................................................................... 21 COMPETENCE & TRAINING – COMMON PI 1 ............................................................................................ 22 ESSIP ATC OBJECTIVE ACHIEVEMENTS ............................................................................................... 22 CNS PERFORMANCE .......................................................................................................................... 24 SUR INTEROPERABILITY (IOP) ............................................................................................................. 24 CNS SAFETY CRITICAL EQUIPMENT ....................................................................................................... 25 TRAINING & STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................. 27 ESSIP 2015 – CNS OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................... 27 CNS STRATEGIC INITIATIVES ................................................................................................................ 29 MET PERFORMANCE .......................................................................................................................... 30 AERONAUTICAL MET ............................................................................................................................ 30 AERONAUTICAL MET COOPERATION ..................................................................................................... 30 GENERAL MET SERVICES ..................................................................................................................... 30 COMMON PI 1.1 & 1.2 – STAFF COMPETENCE........................................................................................ 31 MET STRATEGIC INITIATIVES ................................................................................................................ 31 AIS - AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICE ............................................................................. 33 2016 – 2017 ACTIVITIES & PROJECTS ................................................................................................... 33 KPI PERFORMANCE.............................................................................................................................. 33 AIS ESSIP ACHIEVEMENTS 2016 ......................................................................................................... 34 AIS - STRATEGIC INITIATIVES ................................................................................................................. 35 AER - AERODROME SERVICES ......................................................................................................... 37 NEW FRAMEWORK FOR ANA - AER....................................................................................................... 37 OVERVIEW OF AER WORK PACKAGES ................................................................................................... 37 RWY AND TWY PROJECTS & ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................... 37 AER KPI PERFORMANCE ..................................................................................................................... 38 AERODROME CERTIFICATION WORK ....................................................................................................... 40 ANA ACTIVITIES IN THE STEERING GROUP ............................................................................................. 40 AER STAFF COMPETENCE (COMMON PI 1) ............................................................................................. 40 ESSIP PERFORMANCE ......................................................................................................................... 41 STRATEGIC INITIATIVES IN AER ............................................................................................................. 41 Edition 1.0 Administration de la Navigation Aérienne (ANA) 6 ANNUAL REPORT 2016 - 2017 ELE - ELECTRO – TECHNICAL SERVICE ......................................................................................... 42 KPI 11 – AVAILABILITY OF SAFETY CRITICAL EQUIPMENT ......................................................................... 42 ELE STRATEGIC INITIATIVES ................................................................................................................. 44 SIS – FIRE BRIGADE & RESCUE SERVICE ...................................................................................... 46 REGULATION RELATED ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................................... 46 KPI 17 – PERFORMANCE RESULTS ........................................................................................................ 46 PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN OPERATIONS & INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................... 49 PROJECT MANAGEMENT (PM) .............................................................................................................. 49 PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................. 49 PROGRAM & PM PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................................................... 49 PMO ACHIEVEMENTS IN KPI 19 ............................................................................................................ 50 FINANCE PLANNING & EXECUTION ......................................................................................................... 50 ANA - PROJECT OVERVIEW AND STATUS ............................................................................................... 51 REPLACEMENT INCREASE RELIABILITY, REDUNDANCY, IOP .................................................................... 53 QUALITY MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................... 55 ANA QM FRAMEWORK ......................................................................................................................... 55 PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT PROCESSES ......................................................................................... 55 KPI 17 - RESULTS IN QM 2016-17 ....................................................................................................... 55 COMMON PIS ....................................................................................................................................... 57 STRATEGIC KPI – KPA MAPPING .......................................................................................................... 57 OTHER ANA SERVICES .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Luxembourg Report
    Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators 2009 Luxembourg report SGI 2009 | 2 Luxembourg report Executive summary During the last two decade’s rise in international financial markets, Luxembourg’s economy has grown more than the OECD average. In terms of GDP per capita, it has become the richest country in the world. This situation is not entirely the result of deliberate policy. Luxembourg has been constrained by the dictates of globalization and by the harmonization process within the European Union, but has nevertheless profited handsomely by creating a favorable environment for the establishment of foreign companies. Due to the country’s wealth, the government has often been tempted to try solving problems through increased spending on social programs. However, Luxembourg’s culture does not easily accept the loss of newly won rights. This makes it difficult for the government to return to a more moderate, or realistic, level of spending. More than most other industrial nations, Luxembourg benefits from a rejuvenating population, largely due to high rates of immigration. This phenomenon is even stronger within the economically active population, since many people work in Luxembourg but live across the border in France, Belgium or Germany. Approximately 41percent of wage-earners belong to this cross-border commuter category, and their number has steadily increased over the past decades. The social security system’s current equilibrium is dependent on growth in the number of members, and on their relative youth, which means the system will collapse if growth slows. In fact, studies have shown that in order to sustain the system an an annual growth rate of 4 percent of GDP and an annual job-growth rate of 2 percent must be maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Image of Security, Defence and the Military in Europe
    The Public Image of Security, Defence and the Military in Europe 2 Public Image of Security Defence and the Military in Europe Edited by Marie Vlachová Center for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) in Geneva Center for Civil-Military Relations (CCMR) in Belgrade Belgrade ● 2003 3 The Public Image of Security, Defence and the Military in Europe Published by: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces Centre For Civil-Military Relations, Belgrade Edited by: Marie Vlachová Editors-in-chief: Theodor Winkler Miroslav Hadžić Language Editing and Proofreding: Vera Pavlović Theodora Rankovich Cover design: Marija Vuksanovic Type setting: Leviathan Design Printed by: Goragraf, Belgrade Printing: 500 copies ISBN- 86-83543-08-0 Belgrade ● 2003 4 Contents Preface – Theodor Winkler ...................................................................................7 Acknowledgments................................................................................................. 9 Introduction – Andrzej Karkoszka .......................................................................11 The Importance of Public Opinion in Security and Defence Policy-Making – Jan Hartl .................................................................................16 European Public Opinion and Defence Policy – Philippe Manigart ............................................................................................30 Public Attitudes Toward Nato in Aspirant Countries – Alina Zilberman and Stephen Webber ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Did Europe Become an American Turf?
    How did Europe become an American turf? Bertrand M. Roehner, University of Paris 6 (UPMC: University Pierre and Marie Curie) Ramstein Air Base, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany (2014). 2 3 The United States has conducted nation-building operations since 1898 and does so in a uniquely American way. After defeating Spain in Cuba and routing their forces from the Philippines, the United States began nation- building efforts to establish democratic governments that were representa- tive of the populace. —Colonel Jayne A. Carson, Nation-building. The American way (April 2003) “We must contemplate an increase in the activity of the USIA [US Infor- mation Agency, created in 1953] and vastly increase exchange programs with the key population elements of the intelligentsia, the labor leaders and the newspaper leaders.” —Vice-President Richard Nixon, 366th National Security Council (22 May 1958) “If the proposed student and other groups which we are to organize in Latin America go out and fight for pro-American causes, we must avoid giving any over-emphasis to our policy of trying to keep Latin America as a safe preserve for US private enterprise and US private investment. We must rather go along with the sentiments of the people [even though] this may sound like promoting socialism.[...] We have been for some time promoting the development of a Common Market in Europe. Why could we not make a similar effort on behalf of a Common Market for Latin America?” —George Allen, head of the USIA, 366th National Security Council (22 May 1958) There is a strong family resemblance about the misdeeds, and if you have all the details of a thousand at your finger ends, it is odd if you can’t unravel the thousand and first.
    [Show full text]
  • Security & Defence European
    a 7.90 D 14974 E D European & Security ES & Defence 10/2019 International Security and Defence Journal ISSN 1617-7983 • US Army Priorities • The US and NATO • European Combat Helicopter Acquisition • EU Defence Cooperation • Surface-to-Air Missile Developments www.euro-sd.com • • New Risks of Digitised Wars • Italy's Fleet Renewal Programme • Light Tactical Vehicles • UGVs for Combat Support • Defence Procurement in Denmark • Taiwan's Defence Market • Manned-Unmanned Teaming • European Mortar Industry October 2019 Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology LIFETIME EXCELLENCE At MTU Aero Engines, we always have your goals in mind. As a reliable partner for military engines, our expertise covers the entire engine lifecycle. And our tailored services guarantee the success of your missions. All systems go! www.mtu.de Militaer_E_210x297_European_Security_Defence_20191001_01.indd 1 17.09.19 08:06 Editorial Juncker’s Heritage The end of October marks the conclusion of the term of office of Jean-Claude Juncker as President of the European Commission. His legacy to his successor Ursula von der Leyen is largely a heap of dust and ashes. Five years ago he came to power with a fanfare for the future. The European Union was to be given a new burst of vitality, become closer to its citizens, at last put an end to its constant preoccupation with itself, and work towards solving the real problems of our times. None of these good intentions have been transformed into reality, not even notionally. Instead, the situation has become worse – a whole lot worse. This is due not least to the fact that the United Kingdom is on the verge of leaving the Euro- pean Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Globsec Nato Adaptation Initiative
    GLOBSEC NATO ADAPTATION INITIATIVE ONE ALLIANCE The Future Tasks of the Adapted Alliance www.globsec.org 2 GLOBSEC NATO ADAPTATION INITIATIVE GLOBSEC NATO ADAPTATION INITIATIVE ONE ALLIANCE The Future Tasks of the Adapted Alliance PRESENTATION FOLDER: COLLECTION OF PAPERS ONE ALLIANCE THE FUTURE TASKS OF THE ADAPTED ALLIANCE The GLOBSEC NATO Adaptation Initiative, led by General (Retd.) John R. Allen, is GLOBSEC’s foremost contribution to debates about the future of the Alliance. Given the substantial changes within the global security environment, GLOBSEC has undertaken a year-long project, following its annual Spring conference and the July NATO Summit in Warsaw, to explore challenges faced by the Alliance in adapting to a very different strategic environment than that of any time since the end of the Cold War. The Initiative integrates policy expertise, institutional knowledge, intellectual rigour and industrial perspectives. It ultimately seeks to provide innovative and thoughtful solutions for the leaders of the Alliance to make NATO more a resilient, responsive and efficient anchor of transatlantic stability. The policy papers published within the GLOBSEC NATO Adaptation Initiative are authored by the Initiative’s Steering Committee members: General (Retd.) John R. Allen, Admiral (Retd.) Giampaolo di Paola, General (Retd.) Wolf Langheld, Professor Julian Lindley-French, Ambassador (Retd.) Tomáš Valášek, Ambassador (Retd.) Alexander Vershbow and other acclaimed authorities from the field of global security and strategy. 4 GLOBSEC NATO ADAPTATION INITIATIVE CREDITS CREDITS GLOBSEC NATO Adaptation Initiative Steering Committee General (Retd.) John R. Allen1, Professor Dr Julian Lindley-French, Admiral (Retd.) Giampaolo Di Paola, General (Retd.) Wolf Langheld, Ambassador (Retd.) Tomáš Valášek, Ambassador (Retd.) Alexander Vershbow Observers and Advisors General (Retd.) Knud Bartels, James Townsend, Dr Michael E.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Requirements Analysis Report on Gender EU Military Training Discipline
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 27 February 2020 (OR. en) 6084/20 EUMC 26 EUMTG 2 CSDP/PSDC 79 COVER NOTE From: European External Action Service (EEAS) To: Delegations Subject: Training Requirements Analysis Report on Gender EU Military Training Discipline Delegations will find attached document EEAS(2019) 1115 REV 6. Encl.: EEAS(2019) 1115 REV 6 6084/20 LL/mag RELEX.2.B EN EEAS(2019) 1115 REV 6 European Union Military Staff Official document of the European External Action Service of 21/02/2020 EEAS Reference EEAS(2019) 1115 REV 6 Distribution marking From European Union Military Staff To Political and Security Committee European Union Military Committee CSDP/PSDC; EUMC Training Requirements Analysis Report on Gender EU Title / Subject Military Training Discipline [Ref. prev. doc.] EEAS(2019) 1115 REV 5 Delegations will find attached the Training Requirements Analysis (TRA) Report on Gender EU Military Training Discipline, as agreed by EUMC on 20 February 2020. ______________________ EEAS(2019) 1115 REV 6 European Union Military Staff 1/1 EN EEAS(2019) 1115 REV 6 REFERENCES A. EU Policy on Training for CSDP (ST 7838/17, adopted by the Foreign Affairs Council on 3 April 2017). B. Implementing Guidelines for the EU Policy on Training for CSDP (ST 5199/1/17 REV1, dated 17 January 2017). C. Terms of Reference of EU Military Training Group, ST 14695/18, dated 23 November 2018. D. EUMC Strategic Guidance on CSDP Military Training, ST 7355/19, dated 11 March 2019. E. Guidelines for EU Military Training Discipline Leader, ST 11192/15, dated 23 July 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2007
    EU-25/27 WATCH No. 5 ISSN 1610-6458 Issued in September 2007 Edited by the Institute for European Politics (IEP), Berlin in collaboration with the Austrian Institute of International Affairs, Vienna Groupe d’Etudes Politiques Européennes, Brussels Bulgarian European Community Studies Association, Institute for International Relations, Zagreb Sofia Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Center for European Studies / Middle East Technical Academy of Sciences, Budapest University, Ankara Institute for Strategic and International Studies, Centre européen de Sciences Po, Paris Lisbon Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Européennes Institute of European Affairs, Dublin Robert Schuman, Luxembourg Institute of International Relations, Prague Centre of International Relations, Ljubljana Institute of International Relations and Political Cyprus Institute for Mediterranean, European and Science, Vilnius University International Studies, Nicosia Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome Danish Institute for International Studies, Latvian Institute of International Affairs, Copenhagen Riga Elcano Royal Institute and UNED University, Madrid Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, EuroCollege, University of Tartu University of Malta European Institute of Romania, Bucharest Netherlands Institute of International Relations Federal Trust for Education and Research, London ‘Clingendael’, The Hague Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki Slovak Foreign Policy Association, Bratislava Foundation for European Studies, European Institute, Swedish
    [Show full text]
  • Chancellor Angela Merkel Paid a Visit to Troops in Rukla
    OCTOBER, 2018. NO 5 (5). NEWS LITHUANIAN, U.S. AND NATO BATTALION TROOPS TRAINED IN AN EXERCISE TO TEST THE NEW FIRING RANGE CROATIA WILL CONTINUE (MoD) Alfredas Pliadis credits: Photo DEPLOYING TROOPS TO THE NATO eFP BATTALION BATTLE GROUP IN LITHUANIA Chancellor Angela Merkel NATO'S PRESENCE paid a visit to troops in Rukla NATO AIR POLICING MISSION: 14 YEARS ABOVE THE BALTIC ON SEPTEMBER 14 GERMANY’S CHANCELLOR ANGELA MERKEL, ACCOMPANIED GROUND BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA DALIA GRYBAUSKAITĖ, VISITED SOLDIERS OF GERMANY SERVING IN RUKLA AND IN CHARGE OF THE NATO ENHANCED FORWARD PRESENCE (EFP) BATTALION BATTLE GROUP (BG) IN LITHUANIA. HEAD OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WAS ALSO ACCOMPANIED BY MINISTER OF NATIONAL DEFENCE RAIMUNDAS KAROBLIS AND CHIEF OF DEFENCE OF LITHUANIA LIEUTENANT GENERAL JONAS VYTAUTAS ŽUKAS. ermany has been the first ally to sending rotations of the NATO Air Policing take the responsibility in imple- Mission in the Baltic States and officers to the menting the deterrence measure NATO Force Integration Unit in Lithuania. SPECIAL Gagreed to at the Warsaw Summit and de- Germany had been leading the NATO cided to become the lead nation in forming eFP BG in Rukla deployed for deterrence 2018. VILNIUS, ANTAKALNIS, the NATO eFP Battalion BG in Lithuania in and defence purposes since the beginning of ORPHAN CEMETERY... the context of continuing Russian provoca- 2017. Its personnel contribution is over half tions, aggressive conduct and threat against a thousand troops with weapons and equip- Lithuania and the Baltic states. ment, the largest part of the eFP strength Germany’s contribution to the develop- among the contributing nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Diversity and the European public sphere: the case of the Netherlands van de Beek, J.H.; van de Mortel, S.A.; van Hees, S. Publication date 2010 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): van de Beek, J. H., van de Mortel, S. A., & van Hees, S. (2010). Diversity and the European public sphere: the case of the Netherlands. (Eurosphere country reports; No. 3). Eurosphere. http://eurospheres.org/files/2010/06/Netherlands.pdf General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:30 Sep 2021 EUROSPHERE COUNTRY REPORTS Online Country Report No. 3, 2010 Diversity and the European Public Sphere The Case of the Netherlands Jan H.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Annual20 ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// report 07 Financial report Business review Shareholder information 2007 Annual report Thales 45 rue de Villiers 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine – FRANCE Tél.: + 33 (0)1 57 77 80 00 www.thalesgroup.com www.thalesgroup.com WorldReginfo - 31f96d7b-6321-44dc-9b56-5ddcb02cd173 The Corporate brochure is available at www.thalesgroup.com WorldReginfo - 31f96d7b-6321-44dc-9b56-5ddcb02cd173 2007 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................................................2 Timeline ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Key figures .....................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Governance and auditors ...................................................................................................................................................................8 1 . 2007 FINANCIAL REPORT 1. Directors’ report ............................................................................................................................................................................. 12 2. Consolidated financial statements .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TFK 250 Tactical Field Kitchen
    Product Group 3 Mobile Catering Systems ISO 9001 AQAP Certified Quality Assurance System No. FM 12810 110 3.2.1 TFK 250 Tactical Field Kitchen What is every army's most important weapon? Experienced commanders all Kärcher, the mobile over the world are aware that a catering properly motivated soldier is the most important "weapon" in a systems'specialist, modern army. The right food designs, tests and ensures this kind of motivation produces highly advanced and mission readiness and thus kitchen equipment for the morale of all the troops. For that a hot, tasty meal every day mobile applications with plays a decisive role in the past. the armed forces, civil Boost the morale of your troops defence and disaster with Kärcher's newly developed control organizations as TFK 250 tactical field kitchen. It has been designed for use under well as charity aid "Air Land Battle 2000" conditions organizations. and ensures fast and efficient troop catering with plenty of variety. Give your soldiers the best available: Kärcher's TFK 250. The tactical field kitchen for the coming decades was deve- . loped together with the German army over a period of more than 5 years. The Karcher TFK 250 came out of the extremely tough evaluation trials. Never before were such strict standards set for a mobile kitchen. And never before were the stringent specifications for kitchen technology, vehicle technology, logistics, ease of maintenance and environmental protection so perfectly converted into practice. Why are the world's military cooks so enthusiastic about Kärcher's new diesel burner? Diesel burners are undoubtedly the safest for field kitchen The The burner has a fuel tank with a all lids are made of drawn heart of every field kitchen, it Why are chefs, nutritional experts capacity of 4.8 litres (5 US qts) stainless steel (18 % Cr, 10% Ni) burns completely odourless and and logistics commanders so and is connected via the safety with smooth-contoured corners without taste.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record SJ Res. 18
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Mike Mansfield Speeches Mike Mansfield Papers 1-12-1967 Congressional Record S.J. Res. 18 - Voting: Lowering Age to 18 Mike Mansfield 1903-2001 Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/mansfield_speeches Recommended Citation Mansfield, Mike 1903-2001, "Congressional Record S.J. Res. 18 - Voting: Lowering Age to 18" (1967). Mike Mansfield Speeches. 641. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/mansfield_speeches/641 This Speech is brought to you for free and open access by the Mike Mansfield Papers at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mike Mansfield Speeches by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. S586 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD- SENATE January 19, 1967 REDUCTION OF US. FORCES IN that the total number of sponsors ls 41 The request that our forces be with­ EUROPE at this point. drawn from France seemed to provide an Mr MANSFIELD. Mr. President. I I ask unanimous consent that the res­ excellent opportunity to bring home ap­ send lo the desk a resolution and ask olution be referred both to the Commit­ proximately 70,000 of the 900,000 or more that It be read, along wL. lhe names of tee on Armed Services and the Commit­ American defense personnel and depend­ the cosponsors. tee on Forei<Yn Relations. ents now stationed throughout Western s. n~,. 40 The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there Europe. Instead, the Defense Depart­ Whereas tho foreign policy and milito,ry objection? The Chair hears none, and ment is In the process of moving at least gtrength of the Untted States are dedicated It Is so ordered.
    [Show full text]