DOCSLIB.ORG

The Consequences and Later Life the Military Service Act 1916 Did Not Recognise the Stand Taken by the Baxter Brothers, As the O

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Consequences and Later Life the Military Service Act 1916 Did Not Recognise the Stand Taken by the Baxter Brothers, As the O The Consequences and Later Life Contemporary illustration of Field Punishment Number One. The Military Service Act 1916 did not recognise the stand taken by the Baxter Brothers, as the only grounds for a man to claim conscientious objection were: That he was on the fourth day of August, nineteen hundred and fourteen, and has since continuously been a member of a religious body the tenets and doctrines of which religious body declare the bearing of arms and the performance of any combatant service to be contrary to Divine revelation, and also that according to his own conscientious religious belief the bearing of arms and the performance of any combatant service is unlawful by reason of being contrary to Divine revelation. This was a considerable contraction of the exemption allowed under the Defence Amendment Act 1912, which had provided under Section 65(2): On the application of any person a Magistrate may grant to the applicant a certificate of exemption from military training and service if the Magistrate is satisfied that the applicant objects in good faith to such training and service on the ground that it is contrary to his religious belief. The 1916 Act meant that only Christadelphians, Seventh-day Adventists, and Quakers were to be recognised as conscientious objectors. As Baxter was not a member of one of these, he could not apply for objector status. According to the Act, Baxter was automatically deemed to be a First Division Reservist. Failure to report for duty became either desertion or absence without leave, offences under the Army Act. Baxter and two of his brothers – Alexander and John – were arrested by civilian police in early 1917 for failing to comply with the Act and delivered directly to Trentham Military Camp. On 21 March Archibald and John Baxter and William Little, another objector, refused to put on Army uniform; Alexander Baxter refused to work. All were Court Martialled, all stating that they did not consider themselves soldiers, having never volunteered or taken the oath of allegiance. None was represented by legal counsel. The four were sentenced to 84 days imprisonment with hard labour, served at both the Terrace Gaol and Mount Cook Prison. At the end of their sentence they were to be sent back to Trentham Camp. Back at Trentham after release, Archibald Baxter continued to refuse orders and was sentenced to 28 days detention. In 1917 the Minister of Defence, Sir James Allen, decided that all men claiming to be conscientious objectors but not accepted as such should be sent to the Western Front. Accordingly, orders were given by Colonel H R Potter, Trentham Camp Commandant, that he along with 13 other conscientious objectors - his two brothers, William Little, Frederick Adin, Garth Carsley Ballantyne, Mark Briggs (a politician), David Robert Gray, Thomas Percy Harland, Lawrence Joseph Kirwan, Daniel Maguire, Lewis Edward Penwright, Henry Patton and Albert Ernest Sanderson - were to be shipped out. On 24 July they were embarked on the troopship Waitemata en voyage to Cape Town, where a measles epidemic on board caused the ship to stop. Archibald, Jack and Sanderson and some troops were taken to hospital, and the ship was condemned by the port authorities as unfit for troops, necessitating the civilian liner Norman Castle being used to take the main military group, including the other COs, to Britain. After recovery, Archibald and the other two COs were taken on the civilian liner Llanstephan Castle, arriving at Plymouth, on 26 December. Baxter was still refusing to put on a uniform or do any work for the army. He was kept under detention at Sling Camp, Salisbury Plain, and then sent from Folkestone to Boulogne, and on to Étaples. British newspapers of the time reported that because he had been sent to the front he could be shot for disobeying orders. There Baxter remained under detention and continued to refuse any military involvement. He had been assigned to E Company of the 28th Reinforcements, led by Captain Frederick Harold Batten, father of the aviator Jean Batten. He was placed under Lt Col George Mitchell, 3rd Otago Reserve Battalion, who investigated his case, questioning him about his beliefs, but ultimately finding that he was considered a soldier by the New Zealand Government. Mitchell told Baxter that if he did not obey military orders he should expect to be punished, as determined by Mitchell. Eventually Mitchell punished Baxter with 28 days of Field Punishment No.1 at Oudredoum (near Ypres in Belgium). A doctor examined Baxter before the punishment, and despite telling Baxter he thought he was unfit for it, spitefully passed him as fit. Because the personnel at Oudredoum would not punish him, he was moved to Mud Farm near Dickebusch (also known as Dikkebus) in West Flanders, where he was put under two hours punishment each day. Eventually he was sent to Abeele and back to Mitchell. On 5 March Mitchell ordered him up to the lines at Ypres. Provost Sergeant Booth was put in charge of Baxter and at one time punched him in the face and beat him up, Booth saying he had been ordered to do so. Baxter was placed under Captain Phillips and taken to the Otago Regiment camp. He was then returned to Booth's "care". At one stage Booth, on direction from a Captain Stevenson, placed Baxter by an ammunition dump being shelled by the Germans. Despite a heavy barrage, Baxter was unharmed. After further abusive treatment including starvation, he suffered a complete physical and mental breakdown, and was sent to hospital in Britain about May 1918. According to his records, by the time he went to hospital he had been assigned to the 3rd New Zealand Entrenching Battalion. Baxter was said to have been diagnosed as suffering from melancholia. He was returned to New Zealand, but during the voyage was diagnosed as being in good mental and physical health. He arrived on 21 September 1918, and returned to his Otago farm after the war. The physical treatment given to Baxter can to a large extent be directly attributed to the attitudes of the Minister of Defence, Allen; the Commander of New Zealand forces based in England, Brigadiar-General Sir George Richardson, and General Godley, Commander of the New Zealand Expeditionary Forces. Godley gave orders that if Baxter and the others failed to comply, they were to be "summarily punished or dealt with at reinforcement camps, where they are now, and that they are not to be sent up to the front." Neither Allen nor Richardson had any such qualms and were likely to be the reason behind Baxter being taken to the front. Concern about the fate of Baxter and the others sent to France began to be raised by the Dunedin branch of the Women's International League. The Canterbury Women's Institute also wrote expressing concern. In late 1917 an British Quaker, Maria Rountree, wrote about trying to find the fate of the 14 objectors, only to be stonewalled by the Commander of the New Zealand forces, Richardson. Harry Holland MP, citing an article in the Dominion on 21 November, deduced that the British Government had condemned the New Zealand government's sending of conscientious objectors to the front. The paper had written, "the Imperial authorities have no wish to be troubled with men who will not fight". This effectively ended such deportations, but did not mean the release of those already in France. In February 1918 the National Peace Council of New Zealand, wrote to the Minister of Defence, James Allen, expressing concern about the treatment of Baxter and the others. Of particular concern was the sending of the objectors to the front, where they could be court-martialled and shot for not fighting the enemy. Harry Holland MP also took up their cases, writing to the Prime Minister and newspapers. As further news came of the inhumane way Baxter had been treated by the military, it was the subject of a Women's International League delegation to the Acting Prime Minister and Minister of Defence, Sir James Allen in June 1918. The treatment of both him and the other objectors continued to be raised after the war by Harry Holland MP and others. In 2014 a docu-drama of his treatment entitled Field Punishment No 1 was televised. The attitude of the military of the day towards Baxter was summed up in a letter from Colonel Robert Tate, Adjutant-General, New Zealand Military Headquarters, in which he stated: Regarding Archibald Baxter, the sympathy of many earnest people who would like to see the lot of the conscientious objector alleviated, is wasted on men like Baxter who are in no sense conscientious but are merely defiant of all control and willing to be subject to no law but their own inclinations. On 12 February 1921 Archibald married Millicent Amiel Macmillan Brown, daughter of the late Helen Connon, and Professor John Macmillan Brown, founding chair of Canterbury College. Brown opposed the marriage due to the disparity in the couple's backgrounds - Millicent, educated overseas, and Archie, who had received only a primary education. Millicent, in her autobiography, stated that she had heard of Baxter in 1918 and became a pacifist a short time later. During the 1920s the Baxters farmed at Brighton and had two sons, Terence (born 1922) and James Keir (born 1926). James' middle name was chosen in honour of Keir Hardie, a founder of the Labour Party in Britain, who notably spoke against war at a rally in London on 2 August 1914, two days before Britain (and New Zealand) declared war. James grew up to become one of New Zealand's most famous poets, and both sons became pacifists.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dunedin Lawyer's Seed of Dissent: A.R. Barclay, the Boer War and The
    1 The Dunedin lawyer’s seed of dissent: A.R. Barclay, the Boer war and the socialist origins of Archibald Baxter’s pacifism 1. Introduction: the case for a consideration of the socialist aspect of Baxter’s pacifism Archibald Baxter’s ‘We Will Not Cease’ is an iconic and rightfully famous pacifist statement. Narrated in a lucid and unadorned style, Baxter’s story exposes the horrors and hypocrisy of war. It is also a memoir of courage and resistance, in which a humble farmer from Otago is pitted against the military authorities of an Empire. As Steven Loveridge points out, the ‘success of the text owes much to its narration and the imparted impression of Baxter’s strength of character against hostile circumstances1.’ Baxter’s moral character is tenderly recalled by his wife Millicent, who picks out her son’s poem ‘To My Father’ as her favourite poem, and cites this moving verse: …. I have loved You more than my own good, because you stand For country pride and gentleness, engraved In forehead lines, veins swollen on the hand; Also, behind slow speech and quiet eye The rock of passionate integrity2. 1 Loveridge, S. ‘Calls To Arms: New Zealand Society and Commitment to the Great War’. VUP. Wellington, 2014. p. 167 2 Baxter, M. ‘The Memoirs of Millicent Baxter’. Cape Catley, 1981. p.110 2 This verse is a brilliant and moving summary of the moral qualities of Archibald Baxter, which appear to be intimately wedded to the land itself. We think of the resolute and immensely strong will of Baxter resisting the pressure to fight as a soldier in the trenches of WW1 – the ‘rock of passionate integrity’.
    [Show full text]
  • TF Years 11-13 Truth and Fiction
    YEARS 11–13 FIRST WORLD WAR INQUIRY GUIDE Truth and Fiction Acknowledgments The Ministry of Education would like to thank the following individuals and groups who helped to develop this guide: Dylan Owen and Services to Schools (National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa); Steve Watters (Senior Historian/Educator, WW100 Programme Office and History Group, Ministry for Culture and Heritage); Cognition Education Limited; the First World War Project Advisory Group; Hobsonville Point Secondary School; Mount Roskill Grammar School; Wellington College; Western Springs College. The texts, photographs, and other images sourced as stated below are fully acknowledged on the specified pages. The image on the cover and on page 8 is courtesy of Te Papa Tongarewa; the image of the postcard on page 10, the photograph of Archibald Baxter on page 13, the painting of the landing at Anzac Cove on page 14 and, the two cartoons on page 22 are all used with permission from the Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington; the poem on page 10 is used with permission from Papers Past; the painting on page 11 is used with permission from Bob Kerr; the photographs on page 12, the painting on page 16, and the painting on page 19 are used with permission from Archives New Zealand; the book cover photograph on page 13 is used with permission from Auckland City Libraries; the photograph of the landing at Anzac Cove on page 14 and, the painting Menin Gate at Midnight and Will Dyson cartoons on page 20 are used with permission from the Australian War Memorial;
    [Show full text]
  • Unsung Heroes Clay Nelson © 26 April 2015 Auckland Unitarian Church
    Unsung Heroes Clay Nelson © 26 April 2015 Auckland Unitarian Church It was December 1, 1969. A day I remember well. It was during my third year of university. My roommates and I were gathered around the radio as was every American male born between 1946 and 1950. It was the first draft lottery. For each day of the year one of 366 numbers would be drawn. If a number lower than 195 was assigned to your birthday it meant you would be conscripted in the next year or as soon as your student deferment ended to fight in an unpopular war in Southeast Asia. My roommate, who was also destined to become a minister one day, and I had both applied for Conscientious Objector status. Not being from traditionally pacifist churches such as the Quakers, Brethren and Seventh Day Adventists our chances were not good. My roommate’s number was 128; mine was 313. It was a day of muted relief for me, for although I was in the clear, he was not. My only regret was that I would never learn if I could have convinced the draft board to grant me CO status. To apply for CO status was for me not done lightly or easily. I was not raised in a pacifist family. My father enlisted in World War II, lying about his age to do so. He was conscripted during the Korean War, but was struck down with polio shortly after being inducted. My church did not teach pacifist principles and was closely associated with the power of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2010 PROTECTION of AUTHOR ' S C O P Y R I G H T This
    THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY PROTECTION OF AUTHOR ’S COPYRIGHT This copy has been supplied by the Library of the University of Otago on the understanding that the following conditions will be observed: 1. To comply with s56 of the Copyright Act 1994 [NZ], this thesis copy must only be used for the purposes of research or private study. 2. The author's permission must be obtained before any material in the thesis is reproduced, unless such reproduction falls within the fair dealing guidelines of the Copyright Act 1994. Due acknowledgement must be made to the author in any citation. 3. No further copies may be made without the permission of the Librarian of the University of Otago. August 2010 Parents, Siblings and Pacifism: The Baxter Family and Others (World War One and World War Two) Belinda C. Cumming Presented in partial fulfilment for the requirements for the degree of BA (Hons) in History, at the University of Otago, 2007 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations u List of Illustrations 111 Introduction 1 Chapter One: A Family Commitment 6 Chapter Two: A Family Inheritance 23 Chapter Three: Source of Pride or Shame? Families Pay the Price for Pacifism 44 Conclusion 59 Afterword 61 Bibliography 69 List of Abbreviations CPS Christian Pacifist Society CWI Canterbury Women's Institute ICOM International Conscientious Objectors' Meeting PAW Peace Action Wellington PPU Peace Pledge Union RSA Returned Services Association WA-CL Women's Anti-Conscription League WIL Women's International Peace League WRI War Resisters International 11 List of Illustrations Figure 1. John Baxter Figure 2. Military Service Act, 1916 Figure 3.
    [Show full text]
  • These Strange Criminals: an Anthology Of
    ‘THESE STRANGE CRIMINALS’: AN ANTHOLOGY OF PRISON MEMOIRS BY CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS FROM THE GREAT WAR TO THE COLD WAR In many modern wars, there have been those who have chosen not to fight. Be it for religious or moral reasons, some men and women have found no justification for breaking their conscientious objection to vio- lence. In many cases, this objection has lead to severe punishment at the hands of their own governments, usually lengthy prison terms. Peter Brock brings the voices of imprisoned conscientious objectors to the fore in ‘These Strange Criminals.’ This important and thought-provoking anthology consists of thirty prison memoirs by conscientious objectors to military service, drawn from the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, and centring on their jail experiences during the First and Second World Wars and the Cold War. Voices from history – like those of Stephen Hobhouse, Dame Kathleen Lonsdale, Ian Hamilton, Alfred Hassler, and Donald Wetzel – come alive, detailing the impact of prison life and offering unique perspectives on wartime government policies of conscription and imprisonment. Sometimes intensely mov- ing, and often inspiring, these memoirs show that in some cases, indi- vidual conscientious objectors – many well-educated and politically aware – sought to reform the penal system from within either by publicizing its dysfunction or through further resistance to authority. The collection is an essential contribution to our understanding of criminology and the history of pacifism, and represents a valuable addition to prison literature. peter brock is a professor emeritus in the Department of History at the University of Toronto.
    [Show full text]
  • “To Leaven the Lump”: a Critical History of the Anglican Pacifist Fellowship in New Zealand
    “To Leaven the Lump”: A Critical History of the Anglican Pacifist Fellowship in New Zealand By Zane Mather A Thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in Religious Studies Victoria University of Wellington 2011 ABSTRACT This thesis is an interpretation of the history and character of the Anglican Pacifist Fellowship in New Zealand (NZAPF). It focuses on accounting for the limited growth and influence of the Fellowship upon New Zealand’s largest Christian denomination, and on the continuing marginality of the pacifist position. Throughout its history, the organisation has sought to convince others within the Anglican Church that an absolutist, politically engaged and non-anarchistic pacifism is the truest Christian response to the problem of modern warfare. This has been attempted primarily through efforts at education aimed at both clergy and laity. The thesis argues that the NZAPF has been characterised by a commitment to absolute doctrinaire pacifism, despite ongoing tensions between this position and more pragmatic considerations. Overall, the NZAPF attracted only a small group of members throughout its history, and it exerted a limited demonstrable influence on the Anglican Church. This thesis analyses the reasons for this, focusing especially on those factors which arose from the nature of the NZAPF itself, the character of its pacifism, and the relationship between the NZAPF and its primary target audience, the Anglican Church in New Zealand. The research is based on literature and correspondence from the NZAPF as well as personal communication with extant members, where this was feasible.
    [Show full text]
  • Armageddon Or Calvary : the Conscientious Objectors of New
    The Conscientious Objectors of New Zealand and "The Process of their Conversion" By H E HOLLAND, M.P. ' Mrs Ballantyne asked for an assurance that the lads would not be subjected to persecution during the voyage to England. Sir James Allen replied that they would be subjected to no persecution whatever. Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2007 witii funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation littp://www.arcliive.org/details/armageddonorcalvOOIiolliala p ^uj; %'/i 3 1822 02466 4732 ARMAGEDDON OR CALVARY THE CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS of New Zealand and "The Process " of their Conversion By H. E. HOLLAND. M.P. n WELLINGTIN. N.Z. :; P:- '•:r.' B. Thj- }/:^o-vr.\.\-A:- Wopr;=^s Pp:N^i-;:- and Pi'e;.:5h;v- j, Co. Ltp. AND P-jB;,;c>H^i - H E. Ho:.!.\N' . 207 Ha-:-> Valley Roao. Brooklyn — —, THE C.O's. Their names are writ in every Clink This small but steadfast band Who for themselves have dared to think And firmly take their stand. The tyrants' boast to crush and kill And this proud spirit bend Does only strengthen each man's will To conquer in the end. Although to-night in prison cell 'Neath Mammon's lock and key, It only holds the earthly shell The mind and soul are free. The Brotherhood of Man's their aim ; So come whate'er betide They'll bear it all m Freedom's name, Their conscience is their guide. Though each should fill a Martyr's grave, What grander end could be ? Their death will only help to pave The road to Liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poetry and Prose of Archibald and James K. Baxter
    THE POEJRY AND PROSE OF ARCHIBALD AND JAMES K. BAXTER: LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON? A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in English in the University of Canterbury by Jennifer C. Johnston University of Canterbury 2001 The Poetry and Prose of Archibald and James K. Baxter: Like Father, Like Son? Jennifer Johnston PR 95'81 , D. 7 I~" '.<' 1::> J.;'.,) . J 7:2 Dt Contents Acknowledgements ... .................. '" ... ... ... ... ... ... .... 1 Abstract... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... 11 Introduction ... ..... , '" ............................. , ... ... ... .... 1 Chapter 1 Archie Baxter: The Man with the Iron Will ... ,. ... ..... 7 Chapter 2 Archie Baxter: Brother Bard........................ ........ 26 Chapter 3 James K. Baxter: Following in the Footsteps... ... ... ... 52 Chapter 4 The Legendary Baxters... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 96 Chapter 5 The Mythological Horse ... ......... '" ... ... ... ... ... ... ...... 119 Conclusion ... ................................................... '" 138 Appendix I Poems by Archibald Baxter .......................... ,....... 144 Appendix II Poems by James K. Baxter... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. 160 Selected Bibliography ... ....... , ........ " '" ", ... __ .... I ••• ,.. 186 -'7 JUN ZOOZ Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following people who helped make this project possi,:, ble. Firstly, thanks to my Supervisor Dr. Rob Jackaman of the English Depart­ ment
    [Show full text]
  • Options and Opportunities for New Zealand and France 1918-1935
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. OPTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR NEW ZEALAND AND FRANCE 1918-1935 : Les Liaisons dangereuses? A THESIS PRESENTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN HISTORY AT MASSEY UNIVERSITY, ALBANY, NEW ZEALAND. ALISTAIR CLIVE WATTS 2019 2 Abstract The New Zealand histories typically assert that a new national identity evolved after World War I to substitute for the pre-war British-based model. This assumption has resulted in the creation of a British-centric historiography that understates the important role of other non-British influencers - especially the French – in the evolution of post-war New Zealand. Systematic sampling of newspaper articles in the PapersPast database has revealed that within New Zealand’s post-1918 public discourse there was a diverse seam of opinion and news related to France that sat alongside that from Britain. This suggests that events concerning France were more prevalent in shaping the New Zealand story than the earlier histories have indicated. These additional perspectives have been integrated into aspects of the New Zealand post-World War I narrative, supplemented where appropriate with articles from French newspapers and the archive. When the First World War finally ended, New Zealand attempted to disengage from Europe in order to put the collective national trauma in the past. Resuming the traditional dislike of the French was a reflexive rejection of the war years rather than a considered policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conscription Issue in Australia and New Zealand, 1916–17
    Similar, Yet Different: The Conscription Issue in Australia and New Zealand, 1916–17 JOAN BEAUMONT Abstract Australia and New Zealand came to World War One with similar political trajectories, and their experience and memory of the war had much in common. However, on the key issue of conscription for overseas military service, they diverged. This article considers possible explanations for this difference. As others have noted, whereas New Zealand Prime Minister William Massey could be confident of a parliamentary majority, the early political power of the labour movement in Australia forced his Australian counterpart, W. M. Hughes, to take conscription to a popular vote—a forum in which the performance of politics and dissent took an unpredictable form. Beyond this, Hughes’s chances of gaining consent for conscription were compromised by the timing of the conscription campaigns in Australia—some critical months later than in New Zealand—his personal political style and his failure to craft a scheme of conscription that could secure the majority consent that the more adroit Massey achieved in New Zealand. The Australian commemoration of the centenary of World War One from 2014–18 focused largely on battles. In particular, prominence was given to those battles where Australians were the victims of poor leadership and command (such as Gallipoli and Fromelles), or in which they supposedly made a major contribution to Allied victory over the Central Powers (Villers- Bretonneux and Amiens). Generally, less public attention was paid to those events on the home front that were arguably of greater importance in Australian political history: the two referenda about conscription for overseas service held in October 1916 and December 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • National Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies Newsletter DECEMBER 2014
    National Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies newsletter DeCeMBer 2014 Welcome from the Director The National Centre for Peace and Conflict Finally, I facilitated the third in a series of In thIs Issue: Studies came through its first five year University interactive problem solving workshops between Review with flying colours. A highly qualified academic and political influentials from China, Welcome from the Director panel of national and international experts met Japan and Korea. The meeting in Yokohama, for three days, charged with assessing the quality, Japan, focused on ways in which political leaders Richard Falk visits depth, significance and impact of our teaching, from all three countries might understand research and practice programmes over the and address painful collective memories, stop Tribute to Andrea Derbidge last quinquennium. xenophobic nationalism and deal with territorial Profile: Liesel Mitchell The initial verbal feedback from the panel was disputes nonviolently and creatively. This excellent, with strong acknowledgement and workshop is an example of the practice work that Archibald Baxter Memorial approval our achievements to date and support we wish to develop in the future. Trust launched for our aspirational goals for the next five 2014 has been an extremely busy and productive Peacemaker of the Year years. The panel’s report will make a range of year for the Centre. We welcomed our first Master recommendations for the Centre to consider of Peace and Conflict Studies class. We graduated Major Marsden grant won and implement. 4 new Ph.D students and 6 MA by thesis. We I am enormously proud of the wisdom and now have a faculty of six tenured positions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Military Service Boards' Operations in The
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. ‘Should He Serve?’ The Military Service Boards’ Operations in the Wellington Provincial District, 1916-1918 A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in History at Massey University David Littlewood 2010 Contents Page No. Abbreviations iii Map Boundaries of North Island Provincial Districts in 1921 iv Charts v Acknowledgements vi Introduction 1 Chapter One Setting the Parameters: 10 Government Decisions prior to the Boards’ Operations Chapter Two Keeping a Tight Rein: 26 Government Direction during the Boards’ Operations Chapter Three Equality of Sacrifice: 43 The Attitudes of the Board Members Chapter Four Reality or Pragmatism?: 55 The Attitudes of the Appellants Chapter Five Assessment over Hostility: 75 The Treatment of Conscientious Objectors Chapter Six Firm but Fair: 90 The Boards’ Verdicts Conclusions 104 Appendix Definition of Occupational Classifications Used 108 Bibliography 110 ii Abbreviations AD Army Department AP Sir James Allen Papers AJHR Appendices to the Journals of the House of Representatives EP Evening Post FS Feilding Star MES Manawatu Evening Standard MP Member of Parliament NEB National Efficiency Board NZG New Zealand Gazette NZH New Zealand Herald NZS New Zealand Statutes NZT New Zealand Times NZPD New Zealand Parliamentary Debates PH Pahiatua Herald WDT Wairarapa Daily Times WC Wanganui Chronicle iii Boundaries of North Island Provincial Districts in 1921 Source: 1921 Census.
    [Show full text]