DOCSLIB.ORG

Duchamp's Labyrinth: First Papers of Surrealism, 1942*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Duchamp's Labyrinth: First Papers of Surrealism, 1942* Duchamp’s Labyrinth: First Papers of Surrealism, 1942* T. J. DEMOS Entwined Spaces In October of 1942, two shows opened in New York within one week of each other, both dedicated to the exhibition of Surrealism in exile, and both represent- ing key examples of the avant-garde’s forays into installation art. First Papers of Surrealism, organized by André Breton, opened first. The show was held in the lavish ballroom of the Whitelaw Reid mansion on Madison Avenue at Fiftieth Street. Nearly fifty artists participated, drawn from France, Switzerland, Germany, Spain, and the United States, representing the latest work of an internationally organized, but geopolitically displaced, Surrealism. The “First Papers” of the exhibition’s title announced its dislocated status by referring to the application papers for U.S. citi- zenship, which emigrating artists (including Breton, Ernst, Masson, Matta, Duchamp, and others) encountered when they came to New York between 1940 and 1942. But the most forceful sign of the uprooted context of Surrealism was the labyrinthine string installation that dominated the gallery, conceived by Marcel Duchamp, who had arrived in New York from Marseilles in June of that year. The disorganized web of twine stretched tautly across the walls, display parti- tions, and the chandelier of the gallery, producing a surprising barrier that intervened in the display of paintings.1 The second exhibition was the inaugural show of Peggy Guggenheim’s Art of This Century Gallery on Fifty-seventh Street, which displayed her collection of Surrealist and abstract art. Guggenheim gave Frederick Kiesler free rein to design *I am grateful for the support and criticism of Benjamin H. D. Buchloh and the editorial advice of Hal Foster. Thanks also to Rachel Haidu, Mary Joe Marks, Judith Rodenbeck, and Margaret Sundell for their responses to earlier versions. 1. Duchamp commissioned John Schiff to photograph the space. The catalog credits Duchamp with “his twine,” “sixteen miles of string,” though probably around one mile was used. For a documen- tary account of the show, its history and reception, see Lewis Kachur, “The New World: ‘First Papers of Surrealism,’” in Displaying the Marvelous: Marcel Duchamp, Salvador Dali and Surrealist Exhibition (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001). OCTOBER 97, Summer 2001, pp. 91–119. © 2001 October Magazine, Ltd. and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/octo.2001.97.1.91 by guest on 27 September 2021 92 OCTOBER the exhibition space. Originally a Romanian though Austrian by choice, Kiesler had practiced architecture in Vienna while connected with the Bauhaus and De Stijl avant-gardes before settling in New York in 1926. His installation for Guggenheim’s gallery was more extensive than that of First Papers. In contrast to Duchamp’s menacing barrier, Kiesler’s design went to extraordinary lengths to integrate works into a gallery space that became sculptural. In the Surrealist Gallery, frames were removed from paintings in order to produce an uninter- rupted connection with viewers. Paintings supported by wooden arms floated away from the walls, which were rendered concave. Kiesler painted the back- ground and ceiling black and the floor turquoise to darken the environment, and alternate sides of the gallery were illuminated for two minutes each, divided by a few seconds’ pause. In the Abstract Gallery, works by artists such as Kandinsky, Arp, and Mondrian were hung in midair with string. Interactive and mobile, they could be variously tilted and suspended at any height. While the two installations appear to have little in common, within the scholarship there is an all-too-quickly accepted continuity between them. It is common to read, for example, that Duchamp’s offered a model for the “transparent” relation between viewer and work of art established in Kiesler’s Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/octo.2001.97.1.91 by guest on 27 September 2021 Opposite: Marcel Duchamp. Installation for First Papers of Surrealism, New York. 1942. © 2001 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York/ADAGP Paris/Estate of Marcel Duchamp. Above: Frederick Kiesler. Surrealist Gallery, Art of This Century Gallery, New York. 1942. Courtesy of Frederick Kiesler Archive. Below: Kiesler. Abstract Gallery, Art of This Century Gallery. 1942. Courtesy Kiesler Archive. Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/octo.2001.97.1.91 by guest on 27 September 2021 94 OCTOBER installation.2 Ultimately, this interpretive position derives from Kiesler, who claimed Duchamp’s work as a guide for his own interests in what he called “corre- alism,” or the establishment of the complete integration of artistic media, space, and viewers. “It is architecture, sculpture and painting in one,” Kiesler observed of Duchamp’s work.3 However, to claim that the two installations were similar ignores their antithetical forms and effects. While Kiesler employed string to sup- port paintings, its use minimized any physical separation between painting and viewer. This was to facilitate the transformation of paintings into what Kiesler called “eidetic images,” as if they had lost their materiality and hovered as dream images in space without physical support or frame. Kiesler’s string was the answer to his desire to negate any nonaesthetic barriers between viewer and work of art, or rather to render those barriers aesthetic. Duchamp’s string, on the other hand, acted as the maximal obstacle between paintings and viewing space. It even elimi- nated viewing areas between partitions. If Kiesler made every architectural attempt at an uninhibited “correlation” between the viewer’s perception and the aesthetic objects holding his attention, then Duchamp’s installation achieved the utter opposite by restricting visual access to the paintings, effectively dislocating objects from their visible exhibition, and subjecting the gallery space to a stub- born and disorienting labyrinth of string. To accept any continuity between the two installations, moreover, is a direct result of a failure to adequately historicize the aesthetic developments of 1942 and especially those relating to installation art. Against conventional opinion, I argue that each installation articulated a very unique response to the avant-garde’s geo- graphical, political, and historical displacement. Duchamp’s installation, far from a flippant work or a simple, Surrealist-inspired gesture, acted as a sophisticated negation of certain reactionary tendencies within Surrealism once it entered into exile. This becomes even more intelligible, in fact, through a revised comparison with Kiesler’s designs. The installations, then, represent two models, opposed but productively related, with which we might measure the historical antinomies of the avant-garde in its context of exile during World War II. By rendering the exhi- bition’s container biomorphic and fusional, Kiesler’s installation provided what 2. Cynthia Goodman suggests: “One source for the illusion of ‘transparency’ may have been Duchamp, whose concurrent installation of Surrealist art at the Whitelaw Reid mansion suspended the paintings among sixteen miles of string” (“Frederick Kiesler: Designs for Peggy Guggenheim’s Art of This Century Gallery,” Arts Magazine 51 [June 1977], pp. 93–94). Also see her more recent “The Art of Revolutionary Display Techniques,” in Frederick Kiesler (New York: Whitney Museum of American Art, 1989). On the relation between Kiesler and Duchamp, who first met in 1925 at the Exposition Internationale des Arts Décoratifs et Industriels Modernes in Paris, see Jennifer Gough-Cooper and Jacques Caumont, “Frederick Kiesler and the Bride Stripped Bare” in Frederick Kiesler 1890–1965, ed. Yehuda Safran (London: Architectural Association, 1989). 3. Frederick Kiesler, “Design-Correlation: Marcel Duchamp’s ‘Big-Glass’” (1937), in Frederick Kiesler: Selected Writings, ed. Siegfried Gohr and Gunda Luyken (Ostfieldern bei Stuttgart: Verlag Gerd Hatje, 1996), p. 38. Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/octo.2001.97.1.91 by guest on 27 September 2021 Duchamp’s Labyrinth 95 can be seen as a compensatory “home” for a displaced Surrealism. Conversely, Duchamp’s installation enforced a “homeless” space that resonated with geopoliti- cal dislocation and refused any compensatory strategies of display. Together, they reveal the historical entwinement of the desires for the home and the insistence on a homeless reality, which defines the displaced avant-garde in 1942. In this regard, the condition of displacement suggests a new way to compre- hend developments in installation art during the war years, different from conventional art-historical genealogies that see them as solely related to the critiques of institutions and commodification; for installation, embodying the physical and ideological mediation between objects, viewers, and their surrounding space, immediately concerns issues of placement, location, and contextualization—the very issues that became sensitized and overdetermined in the context of geopoliti- cal dislocation. Once we accept the proposition that the construction of installations in 1942 was in some way more than superficially related to the artists’ own displacement, we need to ask what was at stake? How did the work of installa- tion define, analyze, negotiate, or compensate for the condition of displacement? Displacement and Mythologization Before directly addressing the installations, it is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Crimson Hexagon. Books Borges Never Wrote
    Allen Ruch The Crimson Hexagon Books Borges Never Wrote “The composition of vast books is a laborious and impoverish- ing extravagance. To go on for five hundred pages developing an idea whose perfect oral exposition is possible in a few min- utes! A better course of procedure is to pretend that these books already exist, and then to offer a resume, a commen- tary… More reasonable, more inept, more indolent, I have preferred to write notes upon imaginary books.” (Jorge Luis Borges). he fiction of Borges is filled with references to encyclopedias that do not exist, reviews of imaginary books by fictional au- T thors, and citations from monographs that have as much real existence as does the Necronomicon or the Books of Bokonon. As an intellectual exercise of pure whimsical uselessness, I have cata- logued here all these “imaginary” books that I could find in the stories of the “real” Argentine. I am sure that Borges himself would fail to see much of a difference… Note: In order to flesh out some of the details, I have elaborated a bit - although much of the detail on these books is really from Borges. I have added some dates, some information on contents, and a few general descriptions of the book’s binding and cover; I would be more than happy to accept other submissions and ideas on how to flesh this out. Do you have an idea I could use? The books are arranged alphabetically by author. Variaciones Borges 1/1996 122 Allen Ruch A First Encyclopaedia of Tlön (1824-1914) The 40 volumes of this work are rare to the point of being semi- mythical.
    [Show full text]
  • Time, Infinity, Recursion, and Liminality in the Writings of Jorge Luis Borges
    Kevin Wilson Of Stones and Tigers; Time, Infinity, Recursion, and Liminality in the writings of Jorge Luis Borges (1899-1986) and Pu Songling (1640-1715) (draft) The need to meet stones with tigers speaks to a subtlety, and to an experience, unique to literary and conceptual analysis. Perhaps the meeting appears as much natural, even familiar, as it does curious or unexpected, and the same might be said of meeting Pu Songling (1640-1715) with Jorge Luis Borges (1899-1986), a dialogue that reveals itself as much in these authors’ shared artistic and ideational concerns as in historical incident, most notably Borges’ interest in and attested admiration for Pu’s work. To speak of stones and tigers in these authors’ works is to trace interwoven contrapuntal (i.e., fugal) themes central to their composition, in particular the mutually constitutive themes of time, infinity, dreaming, recursion, literature, and liminality. To engage with these themes, let alone analyze them, presupposes, incredibly, a certain arcane facility in navigating the conceptual folds of infinity, in conceiving a space that appears, impossibly, at once both inconceivable and also quintessentially conceptual. Given, then, the difficulties at hand, let the following notes, this solitary episode in tracing the endlessly perplexing contrapuntal forms that life and life-like substances embody, double as a practical exercise in developing and strengthening dynamic “methodologies of the infinite.” The combination, broadly conceived, of stones and tigers figures prominently in
    [Show full text]
  • HARD FACTS and SOFT SPECULATION Thierry De Duve
    THE STORY OF FOUNTAIN: HARD FACTS AND SOFT SPECULATION Thierry de Duve ABSTRACT Thierry de Duve’s essay is anchored to the one and perhaps only hard fact that we possess regarding the story of Fountain: its photo in The Blind Man No. 2, triply captioned “Fountain by R. Mutt,” “Photograph by Alfred Stieglitz,” and “THE EXHIBIT REFUSED BY THE INDEPENDENTS,” and the editorial on the facing page, titled “The Richard Mutt Case.” He examines what kind of agency is involved in that triple “by,” and revisits Duchamp’s intentions and motivations when he created the fictitious R. Mutt, manipulated Stieglitz, and set a trap to the Independents. De Duve concludes with an invitation to art historians to abandon the “by” questions (attribution, etc.) and to focus on the “from” questions that arise when Fountain is not seen as a work of art so much as the bearer of the news that the art world has radically changed. KEYWORDS, Readymade, Fountain, Independents, Stieglitz, Sanitary pottery Then the smell of wet glue! Mentally I was not spelling art with a capital A. — Beatrice Wood1 No doubt, Marcel Duchamp’s best known and most controversial readymade is a men’s urinal tipped on its side, signed R. Mutt, dated 1917, and titled Fountain. The 2017 centennial of Fountain brought us a harvest of new books and articles on the famous or infamous urinal. I read most of them in the hope of gleaning enough newly verified facts to curtail my natural tendency to speculate. But newly verified facts are few and far between.
    [Show full text]
  • Plastic Dynamism in Pastel Modernism: Joseph Stella's
    PLASTIC DYNAMISM IN PASTEL MODERNISM: JOSEPH STELLA’S FUTURIST COMPOSITION by MEREDITH LEIGH MASSAR Bachelor of Arts, 2007 Baylor University Waco, Texas Submitted to the Faculty Graduate Division College of Fine Arts Texas Christian University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2010 ! ""! PLASTIC DYNAMISM IN PASTEL MODERNISM: JOSEPH STELLA’S FUTURIST COMPOSITION Thesis approved: ___________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Mark Thistlethwaite, Major Professor ___________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Frances Colpitt ___________________________________________________________________________ Rebecca Lawton, Curator, Amon Carter Museum ___________________________________________________________________________ H. Joseph Butler, Graduate Studies Representative For the College of Fine Arts ! """! Copyright © 2009 by Meredith Massar. All rights reserved ! "#! ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful to all those who have assisted me throughout my graduate studies at Texas Christian University. Thank you to my professors at both TCU and Baylor who have imparted knowledge and guidance with great enthusiasm to me and demonstrated the academic excellence that I hope to emulate in my future career. In particular I would like to recognize Dr. Mark Thistlethwaite for his invaluable help and direction with this thesis and the entire graduate school experience. Many thanks also to Dr. Frances Colpitt and Rebecca Lawton for their wisdom, suggestions, and service on my thesis committee. Thank you to Chris for the constant patience, understanding, and peace given throughout this entire process. To Adrianna, Sarah, Coleen, and Martha, you all have truly made this experience a joy for me. I consider myself lucky to have gone through this with all of you. Thank you to my brothers, Matt and Patrick, for providing me with an unending supply of laughter and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrealism-Revolution Against Whiteness
    summer 1998 number 9 $5 TREASON TO WHITENESS IS LOYALTY TO HUMANITY Race Traitor Treason to whiteness is loyaltyto humanity NUMBER 9 f SUMMER 1998 editors: John Garvey, Beth Henson, Noel lgnatiev, Adam Sabra contributing editors: Abdul Alkalimat. John Bracey, Kingsley Clarke, Sewlyn Cudjoe, Lorenzo Komboa Ervin.James W. Fraser, Carolyn Karcher, Robin D. G. Kelley, Louis Kushnick , Kathryne V. Lindberg, Kimathi Mohammed, Theresa Perry. Eugene F. Rivers Ill, Phil Rubio, Vron Ware Race Traitor is published by The New Abolitionists, Inc. post office box 603, Cambridge MA 02140-0005. Single copies are $5 ($6 postpaid), subscriptions (four issues) are $20 individual, $40 institutions. Bulk rates available. Website: http://www. postfun. com/racetraitor. Midwest readers can contact RT at (312) 794-2954. For 1nformat1on about the contents and ava1lab1l1ty of back issues & to learn about the New Abol1t1onist Society v1s1t our web page: www.postfun.com/racetraitor PostF un is a full service web design studio offering complete web development and internet marketing. Contact us today for more information or visit our web site: www.postfun.com/services. Post Office Box 1666, Hollywood CA 90078-1666 Email: [email protected] RACE TRAITOR I SURREALIST ISSUE Guest Editor: Franklin Rosemont FEATURES The Chicago Surrealist Group: Introduction ....................................... 3 Surrealists on Whiteness, from 1925 to the Present .............................. 5 Franklin Rosemont: Surrealism-Revolution Against Whiteness ............ 19 J. Allen Fees: Burning the Days ......................................................3 0 Dave Roediger: Plotting Against Eurocentrism ....................................32 Pierre Mabille: The Marvelous-Basis of a Free Society ...................... .40 Philip Lamantia: The Days Fall Asleep with Riddles ........................... .41 The Surrealist Group of Madrid: Beyond Anti-Racism ......................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Jorge Luis Borges the GOSPEL ACCORDING to MARK
    1 Jorge Luis Borges THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO MARK (1970) Translated by Norrnan Thomas di Giovanni in collaboration with the author Jorge Luis Borges (1899-1986), an outstanding modern writer of Latin America, was born in Buenos Aires into a family prominent in Argentine history. Borges grew up bilingual, learning English from his English grandmother and receiving his early education from an English tutor. Caught in Europe by the outbreak of World War II, Borges lived in Switzerland and later Spain, where he joined the Ultraists, a group of experimental poets who renounced realism. On returning to Argentina, he edited a poetry magazine printed in the form of a poster and affixed to city walls. For his opposition to the regime of Colonel Juan Peron, Borges was forced to resign his post as a librarian and was mockingly offered a job as a chicken inspector. In 1955, after Peron was deposed, Borges became director of the national library and Professor of English Literature at the University of Buenos Aires. Since childhood a sufferer from poor eyesight, Borges eventually went blind. His eye problems may have encouraged him to work mainly in short, highly crafed forms: stories, essays, fables, and lyric poems full of elaborate music. His short stories, in Ficciones (1944), El hacedor (1960); translated as Dreamtigers, (1964), and Labyrinths (1962), have been admired worldwide. These events took place at La Colorada ranch, in the southern part of the township of Junin, during the last days of March 1928. The protagonist was a medical student named Baltasar Espinosa. We may describe him, for now, as one of the common run of young men from Buenos Aires, with nothing more noteworthy about him than an almost unlimited kindness and a capacity for public speaking that had earned him several prizes at the English school0 in Ramos Mejia.
    [Show full text]
  • When the Margin Cries: Surrealism in Yugoslavia
    Sanja Bahun-Radunovic When the Margin Cries: Surrealism in Yugoslavia HE CURRENT GEOPOLITICAL REDEFINING of the notions of the center and the margin accelerated rediscovery of “minor” Tcultures. The study of their import and influences, however, remains largely focused upon the post-Second World War period. Yet, it was precisely modernist apprehensiveness of fixed structures that initiated a subversion of these geo-cultural categories. Nowhere was the urge to restructure geopolitical hierarchies felt more powerfully than in the avant-garde. The geographic effect of this principle was an emphatic internationalization of the avant-garde activity and the establishment of multifaceted relations between the avant-garde “centers” (Paris, Berlin, New York, Moscow) and their counterparts in the cultural “periphery” (Buenos Aires, Athens, Bucharest, Cairo). These unique cross-cultural dialogues fermented in surrealism. Even though Paris served as an indisputable (if self-assigned) center, this site of desire was, quite “surrealistically”, infused and indeed formed by the periphery. We have discovered many loci of the “centripetal” surrealist forces and the literature on, for instance, Brazilian, German, or even Egyptian surrealism abounds. Yet, one surrealist grouping seems to have escaped the record: apart form a brief mentioning in several most comprehensive books, the Yugoslav surrealists have hardly received any critical attention outside their own country1. At the same time, the Belgrade 1 Maurice Nadeau’s classical Histoire du surréalisme suivie de documents surréalistes (Nadeau 1945) mentions the Belgrade Circle only parenthetically. Gérard Durozoi’s Le surréalisme (2002), even though criticizing Nadeau’s book for failing to account for the global spread of the movement, does not escort much more attention to the Serbian BAHUN-RADUNOVIC Sanja, «When the Margin Cries: Surrealism in Yugoslavia», RiLUnE, n.
    [Show full text]
  • Guest Biographies Booklet
    CREDITS Game Design by Mary Flanagan & Max Seidman • Illustration by Virginia Mori • Graphic Design by Spring Yu • Writing and Logistics by Danielle Taylor • Production & Web by Sukdith Punjasthitkul • Community Management by Rachel Billings • Additional Game Design by Emma Hobday • Playtesting by Momoka Schmidt & Joshua Po Special thanks to: Andrea Fisher and the Artists Rights Society The surrealists’ families and estates Hewson Chen Our Kickstarter backers Lola Álvarez Bravo LOW-la AL-vah-rez BRAH-vo An early innovator in photography in Mexico, Lola Álvarez Bravo began her career as a teacher. She learned photography as an assistant and had her first solo exhibition in 1944 at Mexico City’s Palace of Fine Arts. She described the camera as a way to show “the life I found before me.” Álvarez Bravo was engaged in the Mexican surrealist movement, documenting the lives of many fellow artists in her work. Jean Arp JON ARP (J as in mirage) Jean Arp (also known as Hans Arp), was a German-French sculp- tor, painter, and writer best known for his paper cut-outs and his abstract sculptures. Arp also created many collages. He worked, like other surrealists, with chance and intuition to create art instead of using reason and logic, later becoming a member of the “Abstraction-Création” art movement. 3 André Breton ahn-DRAY bruh-TAWN A founder of surrealism, avant-garde writer and artist André Breton originally trained to be a doctor, serving in the French army’s neuropsychiatric center during World War I. He used his interests in medicine and psychology to innovate in art and literature, with a particular interest in mental illness and the unconscious.
    [Show full text]
  • 'A Baby's Unconsciousness' in Sculpture: Modernism, Nationalism
    Emily C. Burns ‘A baby’s unconsciousness’ in sculpture: modernism, nationalism, Frederick MacMonnies and George Grey Barnard in fin-de-siècle Paris In 1900 the French critic André Michel declared the US sculpture on view at the Exposition Universelle in Paris as ‘the affirmation of an American school of sculpture’.1 While the sculptors had largely ‘studied here and … remained faithful to our salons’, Michel concluded, ‘the influence of their social and ethnic milieu is already felt in a persuasive way among the best of them’.2 How did Michel come to declare this uniquely American school? What were the terms around which national temperament – what Michel describes as a ‘social and ethnic milieu’ – was seen as manifest in art? Artistic migration to Paris played a central role in the development of sculpture in the United States in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Hundreds of US sculptors trained in drawing and modelling the human figure at the Ecole des beaux-arts and other Parisian ateliers.3 The circulation of people and objects incited a widening dialogue about artistic practice. During the emergence of modernism, debates arose about the relationships between tradition and innovation.4 Artists were encouraged to adopt conventions from academic practice, and subsequently seek an individuated intervention that built on and extended that art history. Discussions about emulation and invention were buttressed by political debates about cultural nationalism that constructed unique national schools.5 In 1891, for example, a critic bemoaned that US artists were imitative in their ‘thoughtless acceptance of whatever comes from Paris’.6 By this period, US artists were coming under fire for so fully adopting French academic approaches that their art seemed inextricably tied to its foreign model.
    [Show full text]
  • Sretenovic Dejan Red Horizon
    Dejan Sretenović RED HORIZON EDITION Red Publications Dejan Sretenović RED HORIZON AVANT-GARDE AND REVOLUTION IN YUGOSLAVIA 1919–1932 kuda.org NOVI SAD, 2020 The Social Revolution in Yugoslavia is the only thing that can bring about the catharsis of our people and of all the immorality of our political liberation. Oh, sacred struggle between the left and the right, on This Day and on the Day of Judgment, I stand on the far left, the very far left. Be‑ cause, only a terrible cry against Nonsense can accelerate the whisper of a new Sense. It was with this paragraph that August Cesarec ended his manifesto ‘Two Orientations’, published in the second issue of the “bimonthly for all cultural problems” Plamen (Zagreb, 1919; 15 issues in total), which he co‑edited with Miroslav Krleža. With a strong dose of revolutionary euphoria and ex‑ pressionistic messianic pathos, the manifesto demonstrated the ideational and political platform of the magazine, founded by the two avant‑garde writers from Zagreb, activists of the left wing of the Social Democratic Party of Croatia, after the October Revolution and the First World War. It was the struggle between the two orientations, the world social revolution led by Bolshevik Russia on the one hand, and the world of bourgeois counter‑revolution led by the Entente Forces on the other, that was for Cesarec pivot‑ al in determining the future of Europe and mankind, and therefore also of the newly founded Kingdom of Serbs, Cro‑ ats and Slovenes (Kingdom of SCS), which had allied itself with the counter‑revolutionary bloc.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrealism and Feminism from France to Mexico, 1914-1972
    Elizabethtown College JayScholar History: Student Scholarship & Creative Work History Spring 2019 Surrealism and Feminism from France to Mexico, 1914-1972 Emily Wieder Elizabethtown College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://jayscholar.etown.edu/hisstu Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Wieder, Emily, "Surrealism and Feminism from France to Mexico, 1914-1972" (2019). History: Student Scholarship & Creative Work. 5. https://jayscholar.etown.edu/hisstu/5 This Student Research Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the History at JayScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in History: Student Scholarship & Creative Work by an authorized administrator of JayScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wieder 1 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter I. 1919-1929: Founding the Movement............................................................................. 7 Chapter II. 1930-1939: Engaging for the Proletariat .................................................................... 12 Chapter III. 1940-1949: Resisting Intrusion ................................................................................. 26 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 36 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Painted Word a Bantam Book / Published by Arrangement with Farrar, Straus & Giroux
    This edition contains the complete text of the original hardcover edition. NOT ONE WORD HAS BEEN OMITTED. The Painted Word A Bantam Book / published by arrangement with Farrar, Straus & Giroux PUBLISHING HISTORY Farrar, Straus & Giroux hardcover edition published in June 1975 Published entirely by Harper’s Magazine in April 1975 Excerpts appeared in the Washington Star News in June 1975 The Painted Word and in the Booh Digest in September 1975 Bantam mass market edition / June 1976 Bantam trade paperback edition / October 1999 All rights reserved. Copyright © 1975 by Tom Wolfe. Cover design copyright © 1999 by Belina Huey and Susan Mitchell. Book design by Glen Edelstein. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 75-8978. No part o f this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. For information address: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 19 Union Square West, New York, New York 10003. ISBN 0-553-38065-6 Published simultaneously in the United States and Canada Bantam Books are published by Bantam Books, a division of Random House, Inc. Its trademark, consisting of the words “Bantam Books” and the portrayal of a rooster, is Registered in U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and in other countries. Marca Registrada. Bantam Books, New York, New York. PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BVG 10 9 I The Painted Word PEOPLE DON’T READ THE MORNING NEWSPAPER, MAR- shall McLuhan once said, they slip into it like a warm bath.
    [Show full text]