DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction to Arthropoda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction to Arthropoda 1 1 2 Introduction to Arthropoda The arthropods are the most successful phylum of animals, both in diversity of distribution and in numbers of species and individuals. They have adapted successfully to life in water, on land and in the air. About 80% of all known animal species belong to the Arthropoda - about 800,000 species have been described, and recent estimates put the total number of species in the phylum at about 6 million. Evolution : • Probably evolved from a Peripatus - like ancestor, which in turn evolved from a segmented worm Metamerism • Metamerism- body is segmented. Exoskeleton and metamerism causes molting Exoskeleto • Exoskeleton- body covered with a hard external skeleton • Why an exoskeleton? • Why not bones? Exoskeleton good for small things, protects body from damage (rainfall, falling, etc.). • Bones better for large things Bilateral Symmetry : • Bilateral Symmetry- body can be divided into two identical halves Jointed Appendages : • Jointed Appendages- each segment may have one pair of appendages, such as: • legs , wings , mouthparts Open Circulatory System : • Open Circulatory System- blood washes over organs and is not entirely closed by blood vessels. Our system is a closed one Ventral Nerve Cord : • one nerve cord, similar to our spinal column • 2 3 Open Circulatory System Closed Circulatory System Classification : 1-Subphylum Trilobitomorpha 2-Subphylum Cheliceriformes Class Chelicerata Subclass Merostomata (horseshoe crabs) 3- Subclass Arachnida (spiders, scorpions, mites, ticks) Class Pycnogonida (sea spiders) 4-Subphylum Myriapoda Class Chilapoda (centipedes) 5-Subphylum Hexapoda Class Insecta 6-Subphylum Crustacea : • a heterogeneous taxon with many subtaxa • two pairs antennae • marine, freshwater, and terrestrial 3 4 • Primarily aquatic • Free-floating larval stage • 26,000+ known species Class Branchipoda (brine shrimp) Class Maxillopoda / Subclass Copepoda Class Malacostraca Order Decapoda (crabs, lobsters, shrimp) Class Malacostraca Order Decapoda Order Isopoda (isopods) Phylum Arthropoda 1-Subphylum Trilobitomorpha 5-Subphylum Crustacea 2-Subphylum Cheliceriformes A- Class Branchipoda (brine shrimp) A- Class Chelicerata Subclass Merostomata (horseshoe crabs) B- Class Maxillopoda Subclass Copepoda (copepod) B- Subclass Arachnida (spiders, scorpions, mites, ticks) C-Class Maxillopoda Subclass Copepoda (copepod) Class Pycnogonida (sea spiders) D-Class Malacostraca Order Decapoda 3-Subphylum Myriapoda (crabs, lobsters, shrimp) Class Chilapoda (centipedes) E- Class Malacostraca 4-Subphylum Hexapoda Order Decapoda Class Insecta Order Isopoda (isopods) 4 5 Arthropods support and movement Cuticle : Secreted by epidermi Waxes, lipoproteins, proteins. Sclerotized - tanning process that hardens Each segment bound by four plates - dorsal tergite, ventral sternite, and two lateral pleurites. Muscle bands attach to apodemes. Appendages segmented with extrinsic or intrinsic muscles. How do Arthropods support themselves and move? Cuticle 5 6 NERVOUS SYSTEM Side view of body showing relative position of circulatory (yellow), digestive (green), and nervous (blue) systems. NERVOUS SYSTEM General • nervous system is adapted for the needs of a segmented animal as is that of annelids • annelid and arthropod nervous systems are similar • the similarities may be convergent 2. Arthropod Ground Plan • ladder like nervous system • dorsal brain in the head • a pair of circumenteric connectives that encircle the gut • a paired, ventral, longitudinal nerve cord • paired segmental ganglia • transverse commissures between ganglia • longitudinal connectives • segmental sensory and motor nerves 6 7 SENSE ORGANS 1. General • receptors for light, vibrations, chemicals, equilibrium, gravity • cuticle modified to form a vast array of receptors (sensilla) 2. Sensilla • specialized for various environmental events • consist of: <>modified cuticle, usually a seta <> a modified cilium <> sensory neurons <> support cells 3. Mechanoreceptors a. Trichobothria • extremely sensitive mechanoreceptors detect weak, low velocity air currents • a long, slender, solid seta • especially common and important in arachnids • a blinded spider can capture flies using its trichobothria 4. Chemoreceptors • detect chemicals • modified hollow setae with substrate-specific chemosensory neurons • chemoreceptive sensilla resemble mechanoreceptive setae 5. Equilibrium and Gravity a. Statocysts • several malacostracan crustaceans have statocysts • analogous to the vestibule of the vertebrate inner ear • detects gravitational field and acceleration 7 8 6. Tympanal Organs • some arthropods can hear, i.e. detect vibrations in air • tympanal organs are present in several insect groups • cicadas, crickets, grasshoppers, moths • a thin sheet of cuticle (eardrum) over an opening 7. Hygroreceptors • humidity receptors • very important to terrestrial arthropods 8. Photoreceptors a. General • widespread, often well-developed and sophisticated • two types: <>"median" pigment-cup ocelli <>"lateral" compound eyes <>both often present in the same individual REPRODUCTION 1. General • most arthropods are gonochoric • fertilization may be external or internal in aquatic arthropods • always internal in terrestrial species 2. Sperm Transfer • sperm transfer usually by mating or copulation • females usually store the sperm in a seminal receptacle 8 9 3. Spermatophores a. General • many arthropods transfer sperm in packets • an adaptation for sperm transfer on land • male abandons spermatophore for female to find or may place it in the female gonopore • most insects use copulation 4. Copulation • present in many aquatic arthropods (crustaceans), also in derived terrestrial forms • often with courtship and behavior patterns • anatomical equipment for internal fertilization by copulation • male inserts an intromittent organ into the reproductive tract of the female • deposits sperm or spermatophores into her seminal receptacle Arthropod Development Nauplius Zoea Megalops 9 11 Arthropods maintain homeostasis Circulation and respiration : Open hemocoel as a result of hard exoskeleton and lack of internal segmentation. Muscular heart required since body movements can’t move blood. Hemolymph has amebocytes, pigments, and some have clotting factors. 11 11 Osmoregulation and waste excretion : Closed structure required since open nephrostome wouldn’t with such a large hemocoel. Material uptake depends on filtration pressure and active uptake. Reuptake of salts and nutrients 11 12 How do Arthropods maintain homeostasis? Antennal and maxillary glands in crustaceans. Produce ammonia with some urea and uric acid. How do Arthropods maintain homeostasis? Malpighian tubules in arachnids and insects. Blind tubes extend into hemocoel and empty into gut. Produce uric acid. 12 13 Reproduce and develop Usually some brooding. Development often mixed with early brooding then larval stages. Eggs centrolecithal but amount of yolk varies (so does cleavage). Symbiosis scarlet cleaner shrimp 13 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Order HARPACTICOIDA Manual Versión Española
    Revista IDE@ - SEA, nº 91B (30-06-2015): 1–12. ISSN 2386-7183 1 Ibero Diversidad Entomológica @ccesible www.sea-entomologia.org/IDE@ Class: Maxillopoda: Copepoda Order HARPACTICOIDA Manual Versión española CLASS MAXILLOPODA: SUBCLASS COPEPODA: Order Harpacticoida Maria José Caramujo CE3C – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal. [email protected] 1. Brief definition of the group and main diagnosing characters The Harpacticoida is one of the orders of the subclass Copepoda, and includes mainly free-living epibenthic aquatic organisms, although many species have successfully exploited other habitats, including semi-terrestial habitats and have established symbiotic relationships with other metazoans. Harpacticoids have a size range between 0.2 and 2.5 mm and have a podoplean morphology. This morphology is char- acterized by a body formed by several articulated segments, metameres or somites that form two separate regions; the anterior prosome and the posterior urosome. The division between the urosome and prosome may be present as a constriction in the more cylindric shaped harpacticoid families (e.g. Ectinosomatidae) or may be very pronounced in other familes (e.g. Tisbidae). The adults retain the central eye of the larval stages, with the exception of some underground species that lack visual organs. The harpacticoids have shorter first antennae, and relatively wider urosome than the copepods from other orders. The basic body plan of harpacticoids is more adapted to life in the benthic environment than in the pelagic environment i.e. they are more vermiform in shape than other copepods. Harpacticoida is a very diverse group of copepods both in terms of morphological diversity and in the species-richness of some of the families.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of a Deep Sea Spider Crab, Encephaloides Armstrongi Wood- Mason and Alcock, 1891 from Gujarat Waters of India
    Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences Vol. 46 (05), May 2017, pp. 982-985 First report of a deep sea spider crab, Encephaloides armstrongi Wood- Mason and Alcock, 1891 from Gujarat waters of India Gyanaranjan Dash*, Mohammed Koya K. & Nayan P. Makwana Veraval Regional Centre of CMFRI, Matsya Bhavan, Bhidia, Veraval: 362 269, Gujarat, India *[E-mail: [email protected]/[email protected]] Received 17 September 2014 ; revised 14 January 2015 A single specimen of the male crab (3.0 cm carapace length and 3.8 g body weight) was collected from the incidental catch sample of a multiday trawler operating at a depth range of 107-132 m off Gujarat coast of India. The detailed morphometric measurements and diagnostic features with updated systematics have been presented in this paper. The crab has well devolved branchial region and thrive in the oxygen minimum zone of the sea. [Keywords: Deep sea spider crab, Encephaloides armstrongi, Veraval, Gujarat] Introduction Materials and Methods Crabs are one of the benthic crustacean faunas The present crab specimen was collected from and are exploited by fishing vessels mostly as a multiday trawler operating in a depth range of incidental catch targeting valuable shrimp stocks 30-135 m off Veraval coast of Gujarat, India. The of the coast. The species described here is Veraval Regional Centre of Central Marine identified as Encephaloides armstrongi and Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI) is belongs to the family ‘Inachidae’. Earlier known continuously collecting information about the distribution of the crab is shown in Figure 1. The spatial and temporal distribution of fishery crab was reported for the first time from Bay of resources with the help of commercial fishing Bengal in the north-east Indian Ocean1.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Phylum Poster Porifera
    Phylum PORIFERA CNIDARIA PLATYHELMINTHES ANNELIDA MOLLUSCA ECHINODERMATA ARTHROPODA CHORDATA Hexactinellida -- glass (siliceous) Anthozoa -- corals and sea Turbellaria -- free-living or symbiotic Polychaetes -- segmented Gastopods -- snails and slugs Asteroidea -- starfish Trilobitomorpha -- tribolites (extinct) Urochordata -- tunicates Groups sponges anemones flatworms (Dugusia) bristleworms Bivalves -- clams, scallops, mussels Echinoidea -- sea urchins, sand Chelicerata Cephalochordata -- lancelets (organisms studied in detail in Demospongia -- spongin or Hydrazoa -- hydras, some corals Trematoda -- flukes (parasitic) Oligochaetes -- earthworms (Lumbricus) Cephalopods -- squid, octopus, dollars Arachnida -- spiders, scorpions Mixini -- hagfish siliceous sponges Xiphosura -- horseshoe crabs Bio1AL are underlined) Cubozoa -- box jellyfish, sea wasps Cestoda -- tapeworms (parasitic) Hirudinea -- leeches nautilus Holothuroidea -- sea cucumbers Petromyzontida -- lamprey Mandibulata Calcarea -- calcareous sponges Scyphozoa -- jellyfish, sea nettles Monogenea -- parasitic flatworms Polyplacophora -- chitons Ophiuroidea -- brittle stars Chondrichtyes -- sharks, skates Crustacea -- crustaceans (shrimp, crayfish Scleropongiae -- coralline or Crinoidea -- sea lily, feather stars Actinipterygia -- ray-finned fish tropical reef sponges Hexapoda -- insects (cockroach, fruit fly) Sarcopterygia -- lobed-finned fish Myriapoda Amphibia (frog, newt) Chilopoda -- centipedes Diplopoda -- millipedes Reptilia (snake, turtle) Aves (chicken, hummingbird) Mammalia
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Biology 205: Partial Classification Of
    [Leander – University of British Columbia] BIOLOGY 205: PARTIAL CLASSIFICATION OF INVERTEBRATES You are responsible for knowing the following taxa in bold font (Ranks are arbitrary & listed for pedagogical purposes) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Domain Eukaryota 1. Subdomain Excavata (Giardia, trichomonads, trypanosomatids, euglenids etc.) 2. Subdomain Rhizaria (forams, radiolarians, cercomonads, chlorarchniophytes etc.) 3. Subdomain Chromalveolata (brown algae, diatoms, ciliates, dinoflagellates etc.) 4. Subdomain Plantae (red algae, green algae, land plants etc.) 5. Subdomain Opisthokonta (animals, fungi, slime molds etc.) Superkingdom Amoebozoa (dictyostelids, myxomycetes, lobose amoebae etc.) Superkingdom Fungi (chytrids, mushrooms, yeasts etc.) Superkingdom Choanozoa Kingdom Choanoflagellata (choanoflagellates) ‘invertebrates’ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ⇓ Kingdom Animalia (= Metazoa) Phylum Porifera (sponges) Class Calcarea (calcareous sponges) Class Hexactinellida (glass sponges) Class Demospongiae (demosponges) Phylum Placozoa (Trichoplax) Eumetazoa ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ⇓ Phylum Cnidaria (cnidarians) Class Hydrozoa (hydroids & hydromedusae) Class Anthozoa (anemones, corals & sea pens) Class Scyphozoa (‘true’ sea jellies) Phylum Myxozoa Phylum
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Species Delimitation and Biogeography of Canadian Marine Planktonic Crustaceans
    Molecular Species Delimitation and Biogeography of Canadian Marine Planktonic Crustaceans by Robert George Young A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Robert George Young, March, 2016 ABSTRACT MOLECULAR SPECIES DELIMITATION AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF CANADIAN MARINE PLANKTONIC CRUSTACEANS Robert George Young Advisors: University of Guelph, 2016 Dr. Sarah Adamowicz Dr. Cathryn Abbott Zooplankton are a major component of the marine environment in both diversity and biomass and are a crucial source of nutrients for organisms at higher trophic levels. Unfortunately, marine zooplankton biodiversity is not well known because of difficult morphological identifications and lack of taxonomic experts for many groups. In addition, the large taxonomic diversity present in plankton and low sampling coverage pose challenges in obtaining a better understanding of true zooplankton diversity. Molecular identification tools, like DNA barcoding, have been successfully used to identify marine planktonic specimens to a species. However, the behaviour of methods for specimen identification and species delimitation remain untested for taxonomically diverse and widely-distributed marine zooplanktonic groups. Using Canadian marine planktonic crustacean collections, I generated a multi-gene data set including COI-5P and 18S-V4 molecular markers of morphologically-identified Copepoda and Thecostraca (Multicrustacea: Hexanauplia) species. I used this data set to assess generalities in the genetic divergence patterns and to determine if a barcode gap exists separating interspecific and intraspecific molecular divergences, which can reliably delimit specimens into species. I then used this information to evaluate the North Pacific, Arctic, and North Atlantic biogeography of marine Calanoida (Hexanauplia: Copepoda) plankton.
    [Show full text]
  • Cirripedios CD.Pdf
    F R E P L A T A COMISIÓN ADMINISTRADORA DEL RÍO DE LA PLATA COMISIÓN TÉCNICA MIXTA DEL FRENTE MARÍTIMO Proyecto PROTECCIÓN AMBIENTAL DEL RÍO DE LA PLATA Y SU FRENTE MARÍTIMO: PREVENCIÓN Y CONTROL DE LA CONTAMINACIÓN Y RESTAURACIÓN DE HÁBITATS Proyecto PNUD/GEF RLA/99/G31 Subproyecto ESPECIES ANIMALES BENTÓNICAS INTRODUCIDAS, ACTUAL O POTENCIALMENTE INVASORAS EN EL SISTEMA DEL RIO DE LA PLATA Y LA REGION COSTERA OCEÁNICA ALEDAÑA DEL URUGUAY Y DE LA ARGENTINA. ALCANCE: DIAGNÓSTICO DE SITUACIÓN. RESPONSABLE: Pablo Enrique Penchaszadeh MUSEO ARGENTINO DE CIENCIAS NATURALES “BERNARDINO RIVADAVIA” Buenos Aires 2003 Este informe puede ser citado como This report may be cited as: Penchaszadeh, P.E., M.E. Borges, C. Damborenea, G. Darrigran, S. Obenat, G. Pastorino, E. Schwindt y E. Spivak. 2003. Especies animales bentónicas introducidas, actual o potencialmente invasoras en el sistema del Río de la Plata y la región costera oceánica aledaña del Uruguay y de la Argentina. En “Protección ambiental del Río de la Plata y su frente marítimo: prevención y control de la contaminación y restauración de habitats” Proyecto PNUD/GEF RLA/99/g31, 357 páginas (2003). Editor: Pablo E. Penchaszadeh Asistentes al editor: Guido Pastorino, Martin Brögger y Juan Pablo Livore. 2 TABLA DE CONTENIDOS RESUMEN ...................................................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCCIÓN........................................................................................................ 11 ALGUNAS DEFINICIONES.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exceptionally Preserved Arthropodan Microfossils from the Middle Ordovician Winneshiek Lagerstätte, Iowa
    Exceptionally preserved arthropodan microfossils from the Middle Ordovician Winneshiek Lagerstätte, Iowa, USA Hendrik Nowak, Thomas Harvey, Huaibao Liu, Robert Mckay, Thomas Servais To cite this version: Hendrik Nowak, Thomas Harvey, Huaibao Liu, Robert Mckay, Thomas Servais. Exceptionally pre- served arthropodan microfossils from the Middle Ordovician Winneshiek Lagerstätte, Iowa, USA. Lethaia, Wiley, 2018, 51 (2), pp.267-276. 10.1111/let.12236. hal-02408755 HAL Id: hal-02408755 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02408755 Submitted on 3 Sep 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Exceptionally preserved arthropodan microfossils from the Middle Ordovician Winneshiek Lagerst€atte, Iowa, USA HENDRIK NOWAK , THOMAS H. P. HARVEY, HUAIBAO P. LIU, ROBERT M. MCKAY AND THOMAS SERVAIS Nowak, H., Harvey, T.H.P., Liu, H.P., McKay, R.M. & Servais, T. 2018: Exceptionally preserved arthropodan microfossils from the Middle Ordovician Winneshiek Lagerst€atte, Iowa, USA. Lethaia, Vol. 51, pp. 267–276. The Middle Ordovician (Darriwilian) Winneshiek Shale from Winneshiek County, Iowa, USA, hosts a Konservat-Lagerst€atte that has yielded a diverse fauna including soft-bodied fossils.
    [Show full text]
  • (Includes Insects) Myriapods Pycnogonids Limulids Arachnids
    N. Dean Pentcheff Insect Friends and Relations Regina Wetzer What do we know How do we know that? about arthropod relationships? Examples of lines of evidence: Onychophorans Genetics and Genomics Genomic approaches The figures at left show the can look at patterns protein structure of opsins Common of occurrence of (visual pigments). Yellow iden- tifies areas of the protein that Ancestor of whole genes across Crustaceans (includes Insects) have important evolutionary Panarthropoda taxa to identify pat- terns of common and functional differences. This ancestry. provides information about how the opsin gene family has Cook, C. E., Smith, M. L., evolved across different taxa. Telford, M. J., Bastianello, Myriapods A., Akam, M. 2001. Hox Porter, M. L., Cronin, T. W., McClellan, Panarthropoda genes and the phylogeny D. A., Crandall, K. A. 2007. Molecular of the arthropods. Cur- characterization of crustacean visual rent Biology 11: 759-763. pigments and the evolution of pan- crustacean opsins. Molecular Biology This phylogenetic tree of the Arthropoda and Evolution 24(1): 253-268. Arthropoda Pycnogonids outlines our best current knowledge about relationships in the group. Dunn, C.W. et al. 2008. Broad phylogenetic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature Morphology 452: 745-749. Limulids Comparing similarities and differences among arthropod appendages is a fertile source of infor- Chelicerata mation about patterns of ancestry. Morphological Arachnids evidence can be espec- ially valuable because it is available for both living Unraveling arthropod phylogeny and fossil taxa. There are about 1,100,000 described arthropods – 85% of multicellular animals! Segmentation, jointed appendages, and the devel- opment of pattern-forming genes profoundly affected arthropod evolution and created the most morphologically diverse taxon on [Left:] Cotton, T.
    [Show full text]
  • A New “Extreme” Type of Mantis Shrimp Larva
    Nauplius ORIGINAL ARTICLE THE JOURNAL OF THE A new “extreme” type of mantis shrimp BRAZILIAN CRUSTACEAN SOCIETY larva e-ISSN 2358-2936 Carolin Haug1,2 orcid.org/0000-0001-9208-4229 www.scielo.br/nau Philipp Wagner1 orcid.org/0000-0002-6184-1095 www.crustacea.org.br Juliana M. Bjarsch1 Florian Braig1 orcid.org/0000-0003-0640-6012 1,2 Joachim T. Haug orcid.org/0000-0001-8254-8472 1 Department of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Großhaderner Straße 2, D-82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany 2 GeoBio-Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Richard-Wagner-Straße 10, 80333 München, Germany ZOOBANK: http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:135EA552-435E-45A9- 961B-E71F382216D9 ABSTRACT Mantis shrimps are prominent predatory crustaceans. Their larvae, although morphologically very differently-appearing from their adult counterparts, are already predators; yet, unlike the adults they are not benthic. Instead they are part of the plankton preying on other planktic organisms. Similar to some types of lobsters and crab-like crustaceans the planktic larvae of mantis shrimps can grow quite large, reaching into the centimeter range. Nonetheless, our knowledge on mantis shrimp larvae is still rather limited. Recently new types of giant mantis shrimp larvae with “extreme morphologies” have been reported. Here we describe another type that qualifies to be called “extreme”. Comparative measurements of certain morphological structures on selected known larvae support the exceptionality of the new specimen. It differs in several aspects from the original four types of extreme mantis shrimp larvae described by C. Haug et al. (2016). With this fifth type we expand the known morphological diversity of mantis shrimp larvae and also contribute to our still very incomplete, although growing, knowledge of this life phase.
    [Show full text]
  • An Illustrated Key to the Malacostraca (Crustacea) of the Northern Arabian Sea. Part VI: Decapoda Anomura
    An illustrated key to the Malacostraca (Crustacea) of the northern Arabian Sea. Part 6: Decapoda anomura Item Type article Authors Kazmi, Q.B.; Siddiqui, F.A. Download date 04/10/2021 12:44:02 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/34318 Pakistan Journal of Marine Sciences, Vol. 15(1), 11-79, 2006. AN ILLUSTRATED KEY TO THE MALACOSTRACA (CRUSTACEA) OF THE NORTHERN ARABIAN SEA PART VI: DECAPODA ANOMURA Quddusi B. Kazmi and Feroz A. Siddiqui Marine Reference Collection and Resource Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan. E-mails: [email protected] (QBK); safianadeem200 [email protected] .in (FAS). ABSTRACT: The key deals with the Decapoda, Anomura of the northern Arabian Sea, belonging to 3 superfamilies, 10 families, 32 genera and 104 species. With few exceptions, each species is accompanied by illustrations of taxonomic importance; its first reporter is referenced, supplemented by a subsequent record from the area. Necessary schematic diagrams explaining terminologies are also included. KEY WORDS: Malacostraca, Decapoda, Anomura, Arabian Sea - key. INTRODUCTION The Infraorder Anomura is well represented in Northern Arabian Sea (Paldstan) (see Tirmizi and Kazmi, 1993). Some important investigations and documentations on the diversity of anomurans belonging to families Hippidae, Albuneidae, Lithodidae, Coenobitidae, Paguridae, Parapaguridae, Diogenidae, Porcellanidae, Chirostylidae and Galatheidae are as follows: Alcock, 1905; Henderson, 1893; Miyake, 1953, 1978; Tirmizi, 1964, 1966; Lewinsohn, 1969; Mustaquim, 1972; Haig, 1966, 1974; Tirmizi and Siddiqui, 1981, 1982; Tirmizi, et al., 1982, 1989; Hogarth, 1988; Tirmizi and Javed, 1993; and Siddiqui and Kazmi, 2003, however these informations are scattered and fragmentary. In 1983 McLaughlin suppressed the old superfamily Coenobitoidea and combined it with the superfamily Paguroidea and placed all hermit crab families under the superfamily Paguroidea.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Springtail Fauna (Hexapoda: Collembola: Entomobryomorpha) from Ordu Province in Turkey
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2017) 41: 24-32 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1509-28 New records of springtail fauna (Hexapoda: Collembola: Entomobryomorpha) from Ordu Province in Turkey 1 2, 3 Muhammet Ali ÖZATA , Hasan SEVGİLİ *, Igor J. KAPRUS 1 Demir Karamancı Anatolian High School, Melikgazi, Kayseri, Turkey 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey 3 State Museum of Natural History, Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences, L’viv, Ukraine Received: 14.09.2015 Accepted/Published Online: 27.04.2016 Final Version: 25.01.2017 Abstract: This study aims to elucidate the Collembola fauna of the province of Ordu, which is situated between the Middle and Eastern Black Sea regions of Turkey. Although a large number of Collembolan specimens had been collected, only Entomobryomorpha species were given emphasis. From 44 different sampled localities of the province of Ordu, we recorded 6 families, 14 genera, and 28 species. Six of these species were previously recorded and 20 of them are new records for Turkey. The results were not surprising, considering that the sampled region had not been studied previously, quite like many habitats in Turkey. With our 20 new records (Entomobryomorpha), the grand total of the springtail fauna of Turkey is increased to 73 species. This represents an increase of almost 40% of the current list of known species. These numbers show us that the diversity of Collembola in Turkey is not thoroughly known and it is clear that numerous species remain undiscovered or undescribed.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum Porifera
    790 Chapter 28 | Invertebrates updated as new information is collected about the organisms of each phylum. 28.1 | Phylum Porifera By the end of this section, you will be able to do the following: • Describe the organizational features of the simplest multicellular organisms • Explain the various body forms and bodily functions of sponges As we have seen, the vast majority of invertebrate animals do not possess a defined bony vertebral endoskeleton, or a bony cranium. However, one of the most ancestral groups of deuterostome invertebrates, the Echinodermata, do produce tiny skeletal “bones” called ossicles that make up a true endoskeleton, or internal skeleton, covered by an epidermis. We will start our investigation with the simplest of all the invertebrates—animals sometimes classified within the clade Parazoa (“beside the animals”). This clade currently includes only the phylum Placozoa (containing a single species, Trichoplax adhaerens), and the phylum Porifera, containing the more familiar sponges (Figure 28.2). The split between the Parazoa and the Eumetazoa (all animal clades above Parazoa) likely took place over a billion years ago. We should reiterate here that the Porifera do not possess “true” tissues that are embryologically homologous to those of all other derived animal groups such as the insects and mammals. This is because they do not create a true gastrula during embryogenesis, and as a result do not produce a true endoderm or ectoderm. But even though they are not considered to have true tissues, they do have specialized cells that perform specific functions like tissues (for example, the external “pinacoderm” of a sponge acts like our epidermis).
    [Show full text]