DOCSLIB.ORG

DEAN ACHESON and the MAKING of U.S. FOREIGN POLICY Also L7y Douglas Brinkley DEAN ACHESON: the COLD WAR YEARS 1953-1971 DRIVEN PATRIOT: the LIFE and TIMES of JAMES V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DEAN ACHESON and the MAKING of U.S. FOREIGN POLICY Also L7y Douglas Brinkley DEAN ACHESON: the COLD WAR YEARS 1953-1971 DRIVEN PATRIOT: the LIFE and TIMES of JAMES V DEAN ACHESON AND THE MAKING OF U.S. FOREIGN POLICY Also l7y Douglas Brinkley DEAN ACHESON: THE COLD WAR YEARS 1953-1971 DRIVEN PATRIOT: THE LIFE AND TIMES OF JAMES V. FORRESTAL (with Townsend Hoopes) JEAN MONNET: THE PATH TO EUROPEAN UNITY (coedited with Clifford Hackett) Dean Acheson and the Making of U.S. Foreign Policy Edited by Douglas Brinkley Assistant Professor of History Hofstra University palgrave macmillan ©Douglas Brinkley 1993 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1993 978-0-333-56735-7 All rights reseiVed. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 9HE. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. First published 1993 by THE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 2XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world ISBN 978-1-349-22613-9 ISBN 978-1-349-22611-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-22611-5 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. To Alice Acheson - a woman of uncommon courage, talent and intellect Contents Preface IX Introduction XXI Paul H. Nitze Notes on Contributors xxiv 1. The Rise and Fall of Economic Diplomacy: 1 Dean Acheson and the Marshall Plan Michael J Hogan 2. Dean Acheson and the Atlantic Community 28 Lawrence S. Kaplan 3. Acheson, the Bomb, and the Cold War 55 Robert L. Messer 4. Loy Henderson, Dean Acheson and the Origins of the Truman Doctrine 73 Bruce R Kuniholm 5. China's Place in the Cold War: the Acheson Plan 109 Nancy Bemkopf Tucker 6. Dean Acheson and the Japanese Peace Treaty 133 Takeshi Igarashi 7. Frustrating the Kremlin Design: Acheson and NSC 68 159 Steven L. Rearden 8. Negotiating from Strength: Acheson, the Russians and American Power 176 Melvyn P. Leffler 9. Marshall and Acheson: the State Department Years, 1945-1949 211 Forrest C. Pogue Vll viii Contents 10. Foreign Economic Policy in Dean Acheson's Time and Ours 233 WiUiam Diebold Dean Acheson 189~1971: A Biographical Sketch 256 Select Bibliography 258 Index 265 Preface The essays comprising Dean Acheson and the Making of U.S. Foreign Policy grew out of a two-day conference held in April 1989 to commemorate the fortieth anniversary of Dean Acheson's swearing-in as Harry Truman's Secretary of State. The conference presentations were commissioned from distin­ guished historians already working on some aspect of the Truman era and then revised for publication. Those laboring in the field of post World War II diplomatic history enjoy a peculiar circumstance that, say, Gibbon writing on the Roman Empire, did not: namely, important participants are still around to enrich, enliven, refine, and critique the historian's work product. Thus one purpose of this preface is to convey this environment of 'interactive history'. Also, the conference or­ ganizers had concerns broader than the past and left room to follow historical threads to their contemporary tapestry. And so this preface also aims at placing the essays in the broader sweep of the conference itself. The Acheson conference was held in Washington, DC, under the auspices of the Foreign Policy Institute (FPI) of Johns Hopkins University's Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced Inter­ national Studies (SAIS). The conference was clearly congruent with FPI's mission as an integral part of SAIS: to unite the worlds of scholarship and public affairs in search of realistic answers to contemporary problems facing the United States. Since FPI' s founding in 1980, scores of policymakers, scholars, business executives, members of Congress, diplomats, and jour­ nalists have participated in FPI seminars and roundtables, policy study groups, and international conferences. In addition to books and monographs on topical issues of US foreign policy, FPI publishes The SA/S Review, a journal of international affairs; FPI Policy Consensus Reports, the recommendations of leading Americans on vital issues; FPI Case Studies of diplomatic nego­ tiations; and the SAIS Energy Papers. When David C. Acheson proposed to SAIS Dean George Packard holding a conference to commemorate his father's ix X Preface appointment as Secretary of State, Packard seized the opportu­ nity. Mter all, Acheson and his friends Paul Nitze and Christian Herter had been 'present at the creation' of SAIS during World War II. Acheson, Herter and Nitze had seen a need to create a Washington-based graduate school that sought new methods to prepare men and women to cope with the international respon­ sibilities that would be thrust upon the United States in the postwar world. As Packard said at the conference opening: 'We do not require any special anniversary at SAIS to honor Dean Acheson. By that I mean his ideas and works are so embedded in our curriculum on US foreign policy in the post-World War II period that he is studied by graduate students here almost every day as a matter of basic literacy in international affairs.' Today, more than 5,000 SAIS graduates work in 120 countries. The Achesonian connection is further cemented in that SAIS's director of European Studies is the eminent Professor David Calleo, holder of the distinguished Dean Acheson chair. Once Packard and Acheson agreed on SAIS as the proper venue to evaluate Dean Acheson's foreign policymaking from both historical and contemporary vantage points, the planning commenced. Johns Hopkins University President Steven Muller captured the spirit of the event in his opening remarks: 'The purpose of this conference is ambitious, namely to remember the past in such a way as to improve our ability to understand the present and imagine the future.' The conference logistics Packard turned over to the able hands of then FPI Executive Director Simon Serfaty and his extraordinary conference coordinator Joan H. Kloepfer. Anyone involved with the conference had to be impressed with their efficient professionalism. David Acheson's first step in transforming the conference from an idea to a reality was to enlist four of his father's close friends and working associates to help in the planning and to put together a sponsoring committee. Paul H. Nitze was the obvious choice for honorary chairman. As head of the State Department's Policy Planning staff from 1950-3, Nitze worked closely with Acheson on an array of national security issues. When Acheson stepped down as Secretary of State, Nitze con­ tinued to meet with his former boss once a week so he could 'tap his wisdom even when he was not in government'. Unfor­ tunately, a week before the conference Nitze was thrown from Preface XI his horse while riding at his Maryland farm, breaking a hip. Hospitalized, he was unable to attend but sent an intimate letter which sketched a warm remembrance of Dean Acheson and his historic role in the postwar era: 'The happiest and most productive years of my life were those from 1947 to January 1953, when I was among those working closely with Dean and creating the modern world'. Without Nitze's active support the conference would not have been possible. When David Acheson needed a chairman to head the spon­ soring committee, he turned to George C. McGhee. Known throughout Washington as an astute observer of the interna­ tional scene, McGhee was Coordinator for Aid to Greece and Turkey (1947-9), Special Assistant to the Secretary of State ( 1949), Ambassador to the Federal Republic of Germany ( 1963- 8), and Ambassador at Large ( 1968-9). As conference chair­ man he led the fundraising drive. He also generously shared his foreign policy insights during a roundtable discussion on US­ Soviet relations during the Cold War. Two of Dean Acheson's most treasured friends served as conference vice-chairmen: Lucius D. Battle and J. Robert Schaetzel. Battle, as a young Special Assistant to Acheson from 1949 to 1953, formed a close personal relationship with his boss during those years. As Acheson himself wrote in Present at the Creation: 'l shall always be deeply grateful to Carl Humelsine for recommending a tall, good-looking Floridian, Lucius D. Battle, then serving on the Canadian desk, as meeting my require­ ments [for a personal assistant] by being a bachelor, bright, pleasant, knowledgeable about the Department, energetic, and responsible. No better choice could have been made.' Follow­ ing the Truman years Battle went on to a stellar diplomatic career of his own: Ambassador to the United Arab Republic (1964-7); Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs (1967-8); first Chairman of the Johns Hopkins Foreign Policy Institute ( 1980-4); and he is at present President of the Middle East Institute. He proved to be an indispensable vice-chairman, helping to set-up the conference agenda, and participating himself on two panels. The other vice-chairman, J. Robert Schaetzel, was a key organizer of the event. Schaetzel, who was Special Assistant to the Director of the Office of International Trade Policy, De­ partment of State (1945-50), Special Assistant to the Assistant xii Preface Secretary of State for Economic Affairs ( 1950-4), and Ambassa­ dor to the European Community (1966-72), forged a close relationship with Dean Acheson in the 1960s.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The American Experience with Diplomacy and Military Restraint I
    PART I: THE AmERICAN EXPERIENCE WITH DIPLOMACY AND MILITARY RESTRAINT i. Orphaned Diplomats: The American Struggle to Match Diplomacy with Power Jeremi Suri E. Gordon Fox Professor of History and Director, European Union Center of Excellence, University of Wisconsin, Madison Benjamin Franklin spent the American Revolution in Paris. He had helped to draft the Declaration of Independence in the summer of 1776, one of the most radical documents of the eighteenth century—sparking rebellion on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Serving as a representative for the Continental Congress in France during the next decade, Franklin became a celebrity. He was the enlightened idealist from the frontier, the man of principled action who enthralled onlookers in the rigid European class societies of the 1770s and ’80s. Franklin embodied the American critique of Old World society, economy, and diplomacy. He was one of many American revolutionaries to take aim at the degenerate world of powdered wigs, fancy uniforms, and silver-service dinners where the great men of Europe decided the fate of distant societies. Franklin was a representative of the enduring American urge to replace the diplomacy of aristocrats with the openness and freedom of democrats.1 Despite his radical criticisms of aristocracy, Franklin was also a prominent participant in Parisian salons. To the consternation of John Adams and John Jay, he dined most evenings with the most conservative elements of French high society. Unlike Adams, he did not refuse to dress the part. For all his frontiers- man claims, Franklin relished high-society silver-service meals, especially if generous portions of wine were available for the guests.
    [Show full text]
  • Dean G. Acheson Oral History Interview – JFK #1, 4/27/1964 Administrative Information
    Dean G. Acheson Oral History Interview – JFK #1, 4/27/1964 Administrative Information Creator: Dean G(ooderham) Acheson Interviewer: Lucius D. Battle Date of Interview: April 27, 1964 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C. Length: 34 pp. Biographical Note Acheson, Secretary of State under President Harry S. Truman, talks about foreign policy matters during the John F. Kennedy administration and his advice and activities during that time. He also reads the text of several letters he wrote to JFK. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed February 15, 1965, copyright of these materials has been assigned to the United States Government. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. The copyright law extends its protection to unpublished works from the moment of creation in a tangible form. Direct your questions concerning copyright to the reference staff. Transcript of Oral History Interview These electronic documents were created from transcripts available in the research room of the John F.
    [Show full text]
  • Jimmy Carter: a Moral Hero (Student Essay)
    Jimmy Carter: A Moral Hero (Student Essay) Danny Haidar (Utica Academy for International Studies) Abstract. Following the end of Jimmy Carter’s first and only term as President of the United States, historians scrambled to put his presidency in the proper context. More than thirty years later, Carter has become associated with failed presidencies. To be compared to him is to be insulted. Even so, Jimmy Carter has had one of the most prolific, philanthropic post-presidential lives of any former American president. This is inconsistent with the image of his single term in office that the media has painted—a good man should have been a good president. To better understand this irony, this investigation shall seek to answer the following question: how did Jimmy Carter’s pre-presidential experiences affect his leadership as President of the United States of America (1977-1981)? This article will draw on apolitical, supportive and critical accounts of Carter’s presidency, as well as Carter’s own accounts of his beliefs and childhood experiences. While historians interpret Carter’s life events differently, each interpretation reveals important influences on Carter’s leadership in the White House. I will argue that Carter held too tightly to his morals to be suited to presidency. Carter’s childhood and pre-presidential political experiences created a man who was, indeed, unfit for the White House. The problem was less with his political vision than it was with his execution of that vision. Carter’s tragic presidential tale serves as a reminder that moral malleability is a necessity in the highest office of a government.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering World War Ii in the Late 1990S
    REMEMBERING WORLD WAR II IN THE LATE 1990S: A CASE OF PROSTHETIC MEMORY By JONATHAN MONROE BULLINGER A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Communication, Information, and Library Studies Written under the direction of Dr. Susan Keith and approved by Dr. Melissa Aronczyk ________________________________________ Dr. Jack Bratich _____________________________________________ Dr. Susan Keith ______________________________________________ Dr. Yael Zerubavel ___________________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey January 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Remembering World War II in the Late 1990s: A Case of Prosthetic Memory JONATHAN MONROE BULLINGER Dissertation Director: Dr. Susan Keith This dissertation analyzes the late 1990s US remembrance of World War II utilizing Alison Landsberg’s (2004) concept of prosthetic memory. Building upon previous scholarship regarding World War II and memory (Beidler, 1998; Wood, 2006; Bodnar, 2010; Ramsay, 2015), this dissertation analyzes key works including Saving Private Ryan (1998), The Greatest Generation (1998), The Thin Red Line (1998), Medal of Honor (1999), Band of Brothers (2001), Call of Duty (2003), and The Pacific (2010) in order to better understand the version of World War II promulgated by Stephen E. Ambrose, Tom Brokaw, Steven Spielberg, and Tom Hanks. Arguing that this time period and its World War II representations
    [Show full text]
  • Harpercollins Books for the First-Year Student
    S t u d e n t Featured Titles • American History and Society • Food, Health, and the Environment • World Issues • Memoir/World Views • Memoir/ American Voices • World Fiction • Fiction • Classic Fiction • Religion • Orientation Resources • Inspiration/Self-Help • Study Resources www.HarperAcademic.com Index View Print Exit Books for t H e f i r s t - Y e A r s t u d e n t • • 1 FEATURED TITLES The Boy Who Harnessed A Pearl In the Storm the Wind How i found My Heart in tHe Middle of tHe Ocean Creating Currents of eleCtriCity and Hope tori Murden McClure William kamkwamba & Bryan Mealer During June 1998, Tori Murden McClure set out to William Kamkwamba was born in Malawi, Africa, a row across the Atlantic Ocean by herself in a twenty- country plagued by AIDS and poverty. When, in three-foot plywood boat with no motor or sail. 2002, Malawi experienced their worst famine in 50 Within days she lost all communication with shore, years, fourteen-year-old William was forced to drop ultimately losing updates on the location of the Gulf out of school because his family could not afford the Stream and on the weather. In deep solitude and $80-a-year-tuition. However, he continued to think, perilous conditions, she was nonetheless learn, and dream. Armed with curiosity, determined to prove what one person with a mission determination, and a few old science textbooks he could do. When she was finally brought to her knees discovered in a nearby library, he embarked on a by a series of violent storms that nearly killed her, daring plan to build a windmill that could bring his she had to signal for help and go home in what felt family the electricity only two percent of Malawians like complete disgrace.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Europe
    LETTER TO EUROPE by Philip H Gordon In an open letter, Washington’s top Europe-watcher proposes a “new deal” to help drag transatlantic relations out of their postwar low. The future of the west is at stake EAR FRIENDS.How did it come to this? I icans and Europeans on a range of issues. The end of cannot remember a time when the gulf the cold war, the rise of US military, political and eco- between Europeans and Americans was nomic power during the 1990s, and Europe’s preoc- so wide. For the past couple of years, I cupation with the challenges of integration and Dhave argued that the Iraq crisis was a sort of “perfect enlargement, have combined to accentuate these dif- storm” unlikely to be repeated, and that many of the ferences. But we have had different strategic perspec- recent tensions resulted from the personalities and tives—and fights about strategy—for years, and that shortcomings of key actors on both sides. The never prevented us from working together towards transatlantic alliance has overcome many crises common goals. And despite the provocations from before, and given our common interests and values ideologues on both sides, this surely remains possible and the enormous challenges we face, I have been today. Leaders still have options, and decisions to confident that we could also overcome this latest spat. make. They shape their environment as much as they Now I just don’t know any more. After a series of are shaped by it. The right choices could help put the increasingly depressing trips to Europe, even my world’s main liberal democracies back in the same optimism is being tested.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2010 14 June 1951
    The United States of America Office of the Secretary of Defense Reserve Forces Policy Board Annual Report 2010 14 June 1951 The first Chairman of the Reserve Forces Policy Board, Mr. Charles H. Buford (center) is sworn in by Mr. Ralph N. Stohl, Director of Administration, Office of the Secretary of Defense (left), during a special ceremony in the office of the Secretary of Defense George C. Marshall (right) at the Pentagon The importance of adequate reserve forces to the security of the nation has been clearly demonstrated by recent world events... I am confident that the Reserve Forces Policy Board will continue to achieve the success it has demonstrated in the past. GEORGE C. MARSHALL, JUNE 13, 1951 The United States of America Office of the Secretary of Defense Reserve Forces Policy Board Annual Report Fiscal Year 2010 30 September 2010 A man who is good enough to shed his blood for his country is good enough to be given a square deal afterwards. More than that no man is entitled, and less than that no man shall have. THEODORE ROOSEVELT, JULY, 1903 I. Preliminary Statement Secretary of Defense, General of the Army, George C. Marshall, abolished the Civilian Components Policy Board in June, 1951 and created the Reserve Forces Policy Board. The Congress and President Harry S. Truman codified this decision in the Armed Forces Reserve Act of July 1952. The Board thus created has remained essentially the same in its mission and responsibility for nearly sixty years. The fundamental assumptions which created the RFPB, and its predecessor the CCPB, found in the National Security Act of 1947, also remain as true and relevant today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School REMEMBERING JIMMY CARTER THE RHETORICAL EVOCATIONS OF PRESIDENTIAL MEMORIES A Thesis in Communication Arts and Sciences by Brandon M. Johnson 2020 Brandon M. Johnson Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts August 2020 The thesis of Brandon M. Johnson was reviewed and approved by the following: Mary E. Stuckey Professor, Communication Arts and Sciences Thesis Advisor Stephen H. Browne Liberal Arts Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Michael J. Steudeman Assistant Professor of Rhetoric and Director of CAS100A Denise H. Solomon Head and Liberal Arts Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences iii ABSTRACT This thesis is an analysis of the public memory of Jimmy Carter and the way the historical resources of his presidency (including his perceived moral character) are interpreted and evoked as a shorthand for presidential failure by associating him with a rhetoric of weakness. Broadly, I consider the nature of presidential memory, asking how a presidency passes from history to memory. I suggest that presidential histories serve as inventional resources in the present, with rhetors evoking interpretations of the past as rhetorical appeals. These appeals are acts of memory, and analyzing how they function discursively and are deployed strategically draws out how presidential memory works and what implications it has to presidential rhetoric. The different strategies used in remembering the presidency of Jimmy Carter are useful texts for rhetorically critiquing this process because Carter is often deployed as a rhetorical shorthand, providing a representative example of interpreting presidential pasts. I begin by considering the evolving scholarship and historiography on Carter and conceptualizing how presidential pasts can be interpreted in the present through acts of remembering.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vice Presidency of Richard M Nixon: One Man's Quest for National Respect, an International Reputation, and the Presidency
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1998 The vice presidency of Richard M Nixon: One man's quest for national respect, an international reputation, and the presidency Benjamin Joel Goldberg College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Goldberg, Benjamin Joel, "The vice presidency of Richard M Nixon: One man's quest for national respect, an international reputation, and the presidency" (1998). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623928. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-jv24-vd41 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilsonian Open Door and Truman's China-Taiwan Policy
    Dean P. Chen American Association for Chinese Studies Annual Conference October 12-14, 2012 Origins of the Strategic Ambiguity Policy: The Wilsonian Open Door and Truman’s China-Taiwan Policy 1 The Problem of the Taiwan Strait Conflict The Taiwan Strait is probably one of the “most dangerous” flashpoints in world politics today because the Taiwan issue could realistically trigger an all-out war between two nuclear-armed great powers, the United States and People’s Republic of China (PRC). 2 Since 1949, cross-strait tensions, rooted in the Chinese civil war between Chiang Kai- shek’s Nationalist Party (KMT) and Mao Zedong’s Communist Party (CCP), have been contentious and, at times, highly militarized. As analyzed by many scholars, the Taiwan Strait crises in 1954, 1958, 1995-96, and 2003-06 brought the PRC, Taiwan, and the United States closely to the brink of war. 3 In each of these episodes, however, rational restraint prevailed due to America’s superior power influence to prevent both sides from upsetting the tenuous cross-strait status quo. Indeed, having an abiding interest in a peaceful resolution of the Taiwan Strait conflict, Washington has always assumed a pivotal role in deterring both Taipei and Beijing from aggressions and reckless behaviors. U.S. leaders seek to do this through the maintenance of a delicate balance: acknowledging the one-China principle, preserving the necessary ties to defend Taiwan’s freedom and security while insisting that all resolutions must be peaceful and consensual. 4 The Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, and Ronald Reagan administrations formalized these commitments in the three U.S.-China 1 This paper is an abridged and modified version of the author’s recent book: Dean P.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes from FDR to Dean Acheson
    Department of History University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Modernization of the State Department: Changes from FDR to Dean Acheson 1945-1953 Kyle Schwan Cooperating Professor: Oscar Chamberlain 1 Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………....4 Historiography……………………………………………………………………………5 The FDR Years and “Old State”……………………………………………………….6 Changes in the Post FDR Years………………………………………………………10 The Truman Acheson years……………………………………………………………13 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………..15 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………18 2 Abstract This capstone looks at and analyzes the changes in organization and administration of the United States Department of State from the middle of the 1940’s through 1953. Looking at the organization of the State Department during these years will show the influence World War II had on the Department as well as how the Department grew in order to manage all of the new areas of interest of the United States Government. Along with this it looks at the role that each Secretary of State played in making changes to the State Department especially the decisions and actions taken by Dean Acheson. Official State Department documents along with Congressional records are used as well as the personal accounts of various people including Dean Acheson. 3 Introduction As the United States was regrouping from World War II it needed to decide what to do with the massive war machine that had been created in order to be victorious. In many cases this war machine was dismantled and departments were disbanded. However, one department grew and grew exponentially due to the fact that the United States had been thrust into the front of world politics and world economics. This department was now required to oversee the entire world and assess any threats to itself and its allies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Deluge: Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans, and the Mississippi Gulf Coast
    Journal of Applied Communications Volume 90 Issue 1 Article 8 The Great Deluge: Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans, and the Mississippi Gulf Coast Linda Foster Benedict Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/jac This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Benedict, Linda Foster (2006) "The Great Deluge: Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans, and the Mississippi Gulf Coast," Journal of Applied Communications: Vol. 90: Iss. 1. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1292 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Applied Communications by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Great Deluge: Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans, and the Mississippi Gulf Coast Abstract A book review of The Great Deluge: Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans, and the Mississippi Gulf Coast, by Douglas Brinkley. This review is available in Journal of Applied Communications: https://newprairiepress.org/jac/vol90/iss1/8 Benedict: The Great Deluge: Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans, and the Mississ Journal of Applied Communications, Vol. 90, No. 1, 2006, 71-73 ©ACE The Great Deluge: Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans, and the Mississippi Gulf Coast Douglas Brinkley (HarperCollins, New York, NY, 2006. 716 pages. $29.95, hardcover, ISBN 13:978-0-06-112423-5) This is a must-read for ACE members. Not only does it serve as a model for good writing, but it vividly shows the tragic consequences of communi­ cation failure. There are lessons to be learned on techniques-such as inter­ viewing, media relations, and videography-as well as on crisis communica­ tion.
    [Show full text]