Proceedings of the First International Congress, Melbourne 1992 273

Grazing animals as biological control agents

Ian Popay2 and Roger Field2 , have a natural advantage over many weed species. MAFTechnology, Flock House Agricultural Identifying a weed in grassland is difficult Centre, Private Bag, Bulls, New Zealand for and scientists alike, even if it is 2 Plant Science Department, Lincoln University, defined simply as a plant species detrimentally Canterbury, New Zealand interfering with human activities. Barley grass may reduce growth rates when seeding Summary but provides invaluable fodder when vegeta- Grazing animals are widely used as biologi- tive. Obvious weeds are either poisonous or cal control agents, but only in systems unpalatable, reducing the grassland available supporting crop / and animal species to grazing stock. Species which may reduce rotations. Their main use is for food or grassland productivity are harder to identify as fibre, and weed control is incidental. To be weeds, and include some grasses and clovers. successful, weed control must become, Weediness is harder to define when plants temporarily, the main objective. The have redeeming features like high trace species, intensity and duration of grazing element content. animals can be controlled by fencing, allowing selectivity between weeds and Australian and New Zealand grazing desirable species. Many examples of success- ful biological control by grazing animals are systems given. Sustainability of control is offered by In Europe and North America, extensive use of increasing the control methods, and reduc- pesticides and has allowed develop- ing their predictability. ment of simple agricultural systems. Some modem have no animals, whilst 62% of Introduction the 1982 U.S.A. beef market was controlled by large feed -lot production (22). This limits the Biological control cheaply and permanently scope for using grazing animals as biological reduces the impact of weed species. Tradition- control agents. ally, biological control redresses the natural Many New Zealand and Australian produc- balance by importing pests from the countries tion systems include pasture /crop rotations and in which the weeds originated. Increasing some rotation of and sheep. Australian resistance, consumer preferences for farmers in the 70 million ha wheat and sheep pesticide -free food, and unprofitable pastoral zone can vary the area of wheat, and cattle or production make alternatives to sheep numbers (24). Australian and New more attractive. For weeds which are hard to Zealand grazing systems are relatively exten- eliminate, biological control may be the only sive and have to be sustainable at low input practical method. levels. Grazing animals can act as biological These agricultural systems often rely on control agents in both grassland and crops, plants or animals imported from Europe within either within the crop itself, or by reducing the last 200 years. The major weeds were also weed numbers or seed set in the preceding imported, often without the pests and diseases pasture or crop. Weeds may be more palatable which limited their impact in Europe. There, than desirable species and therefore grazed competitive pasture species, and grazing harder, or they may be less capable of recover- animals which ate the weeds and increased the ing from grazing. Grasses and the clovers tiller density and growth rates of the pasture (Trifolium spp.) or medics (Medicago spp.) species also helped to control the weeds. often associated with them, being adapted to 274 Proceedings of the First International Weed Control Congress, Melbourne 1992

Carter (4) examined how grazing animals used for `public -good' weed control. Feral control weeds in the Australian integrated goats have been encouraged in the Wairoa crop pasture - system. He emphasized district of New Zealand to help reduce the the value of fencing and noted how grazing spread and impact of blackberry (Rubus animals in the pasture phase of a rotation can fruticosus). reduce seed set by potential crop weeds. Australian and New Zealand examples Extending the definition of biological Amor (1) pointed out that grazing by sheep is control the main method of biological control on Biological control treatises rarely discuss the dryland farms in Victoria, and that sheep are use of grazing animals for control of weeds. used extensively to suppress weeds on fallows Yet grazing animals, like classical biological and, to some extent, to reduce the seed produc- control agents, are often introduced from the tion of weeds in before cropping. same native environment as the weeds. Sheep, control some weeds which become Selectivity is important in both cases. Conven- dominant under cattle grazing. Under sheep tional biological control agents are released if grazing, the size, importance and flowering they reproduce only on the target species. performance of ragwort (Senecio jacobaea) Grazing animals feed both on target species, and giant buttercup (Ranunculus acris) are and on desirable crop species. The target reduced (8,28). Judicious timing and intensity species must be more damaged by grazing, or of grazing with sheep can help control Califor- regrow less well after grazing. nian thistle (Cirsium arvense) (13), Scotch Biological control, whether conventional or thistle (C. vulgare in New Zealand) (9), and by grazing animals, is more sustainable than Paterson's curse (Echium plantagineum) (4). continuous pesticide use. Increased diversity Seed output from barley grass and other of control agents makes the system more grasses is reduced by timely, hard grazing resilient to change. Herbicide resistance is pressure with sheep (7). Sheep can be impor- unlikely to develop. Farming a mixture of tant in the control of gorse (Ulex europaeus) crops and animal species allows the seedlings in pasture developed after burning of more flexibility in management and marketing mature gorse (10). They are commonly used strategies. for general weed control in , vineyards Grazing animals are introduced primarily and waste places. for food or fibre, and their use for weed Weed control can be enhanced by applica- control is of secondary concern. However, if tion of sub lethal herbicide rates which make weed control becomes the main objective, weeds more palatable, so that they are killed some sacrifice of animal production may be by grazing rather than by the herbicide. This necessary. Classical biological control agents technique is known in Australia as "spray - are introduced primarily for weed control, and grazing" (6). rarely have any other value. Fish species can Bracken (Pteridium aquilinum var. be introduced either for grazing control of esculentum) has been controlled by cattle aquatic weeds or for food, or both (15). treading, or more often, by crushing and The difference in size between conven- burning, oversowing and fertilizing, followed tional biocontrol agents, usually smaller than by mob - stocking with cattle (21). Cattle, at a the target species, and larger grazing animals, reasonable stocking rate, can give good control has several consequences. Grazing animals can of Californian thistle (12). be contained, so that grazing pressure and Goats have been used to control many intensity achieve maximum selectivity be- weeds which are resistant to grazing by sheep tween weeds and desired species. The benefits and cattle. They seem to cope well with spiny of biological control can be captured privately, plants and have given effective control of which means that weeds outside the fence blackberry ( Rubus fruticosus) (30), sweet briar remain uncontrolled. Spraying insecticide, or (Rosa rubiginosa) (19), serrated tussock augmentation by releasing extra insects or (Nasella trichotoma) and galvanized burr spores are the only ways in which established (Sclerolaena birchii) (2), gorse (33), hore- conventional biological control agents can be hound (Marrubium vulgare) (14), matagouri manipulated. Grazing animals are, however, (Discaria toumatou) (5) and rushes (25). Goats Proceedings of the First International Weed Control Congress, Melbourne 1992 275 eat flowering thistles, but are not attracted to In. Britain, bracken (Pteridium dquilinum the vegetative rosette stage. Thistles controlled ssp. aquilinum) increased dramaticallywith include Illyrian thistle (Onopordum illyricum) the replacement of cattle by sheep on rougher (3), saffron thistle (Carthamus lanatus) (23), grazings in the 18th and 19th centuries, and variegated thistle (Silybum marianum) (2), increasing cattle numbers has been suggested nodding thistle (Carduus nutans), Scotch as a means of controlling, bracken (27). thistle (Onopordum acanthium in Australia) (18) and artichoke thistle (Cynara Other grazing animals used for biological cardunculus) (18). control Variation of grazing intensity and timing, Geese are used for weed control in peppermint using the normal grazing species, can give (Mentha x piperita) in Oregon, and in Oregon control of some weed species. Although and California for weed control in garlic Californian thistle is a major problem of (Allium sativum), tomatoes (Lycopersicon cattle grazed pasture, intensive cattle grazing, esculentum), cucumber (Cucumis sativus), especially through spring, when the shoots are cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), orchards and soft and newly emerged, reduces its incidence vineyards (20). Weeder geese have also been (12). Similarly, hard spring grazing with reported in strawberries, corn (26) and pota- sheep, or spring spraying or mowing followed toes (17). Julien (15) lists the following fish by hard with sheep will species introduced for biological control of control Californian thistle (13). aquatic weeds (including algae): grass carp Weeds are often easier to control when (Ctenopharyngodon idella), Osphronemus young. Gorse, for example, can be controlled goramy, Puntius javanicus, Tilapia by sheep in the seedling stage (11), but goats melanopleura, T. mossambica, T. zilli, big are necessary for control of larger plants. head (Aristichthys nobilis), silver carp West and Dean (31) have described the use (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). Some of these of grazing animals for control of a range of are suitable for food as well as for biological species, notably pampas grass (Cortaderia control. spp.), bracken, gorse, toetoe (Cortaderia Van Zon (29) talks of experiments with fulvida) and shrub hardwoods, in young manatees (Trichechus manatús L.) as grazers forestry plantations in New Zealand. The most of unwanted aquatic vegetation. Their use may notable success has been in the control of be limited by their need for high temperatures pampas grass with beef cattle. and deep- water, and because of their status as Although the list of weed species control- an endangered species. The same author led by grazing animals is impressive, not all discusses aquatic weed control with bird species can be controlled. Herbaceous perenni- speciesespecially ducks (Anas domesticus), als with rhizomes or creeping roots are diffi- geese (Anser domesticus), swans (Cygnus spp.) cult. Californian thistle can be controlled by and coots (Fulica atra). He also mentions that grazing animals, but the grazing pressures herbivorous turtles are useful in Florida and required allow control on relatively small Pakistan, but their husbandry is difficult. areas. Couch (Elytrigia repens) is probably impossible to control by grazing. Conclusions: multiple. land use for sustainability Conventional grazing animals used for Grazing animals as biological control agents biological control elsewhere have several benefits. Weed control is rarely Wood (32) demonstrated the value of goats for the main objective of keeping the livestock, so general brush weed control in abandoned that, provided the stock have some other value, farmland in Vermont. Rosenthal et al. (26) weed control is cheap. Even if goats, for claimed that goats could be rented in the San example, have little value as primary produc- Francisco Bay area for clearing land of thistles ers, their upkeep (apart from fencing) is cheap and other difficult weeds. Landgraf et al. (16) and their value as biological control agents showed that sheep can effectively be used for may exceed this cost in some weed -prone leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) control in areas. Some control of crop weeds can be rangelands in North America. achieved by including grazed pasture in 276 Proceedings of the First International Weed Control Congress, Melbourne 1992

rotations. This can reduce the build -up in Australian Weeds Conference, pp. 239 -42. numbers of crop weeds, and may also help to 5.Cossens, G.G., Mitchell, R.B. and Crossan, reduce the numbers of seeds of some weeds in G.S. (1989). Matagouri, hawkweed and the soil. purple fuzzweed control with sheep, goats Herbicide resistance is less likely to and legumes in the New Zealand tussock develop if grazing animals are used for weed grassland. Proceedings Brighton Crop control within the agricultural system. Re- Protection Conference, Weeds, pp. 879 -84. peated use of the same animal species will 6.Dellow, J.J. and McDonald, W. (1990). develop a population of weeds resistant to Weed control in lucerne and pasture 1990. grazing by that species, but using different New South Wales and Fisher-

animal species, or including cultivated crops ies Agdex 130/640. . within the rotation, helps to overcome this 7.George, J.M. (1972). Effects of grazing by problem. sheep on barley grass (Hordeum leporinum Agriculture is often considered more Link) infestation of pastures. Proceedings sustainable if the system uses a greater diver- of the Australian Society of Animal sity of animal and plant species, and if rota- Production, 9, 221 -4. tions, of crops or of grazing species, are used. 8.Harradine, A.R. (1987). Control of ragwort Effective biological control of a range of by Wiltshire Horn sheep. Proceedings 8th weeds by grazing animals is more likely with Australian Weeds Conference, p. 64. several species of animals. Including a grazed 9.Hartley, M.J. (1981). The effect of grazing pasture phase within the rotation gives farmers and pasture species on the survival of the opportunity to use the grazing animals to Scotch thistle. Proceedings 34th New reduce weed numbers within the cropping Zealand Weed and Pest Control Society, phase. pp. 114 -6. With the international movement towards 10.Hartley, M.J. (1982). Control of young greater diversity and sustainability within gorse plants by grazing. Proceedings 35th farming systems, opportunities for using New Zealand Weed and Pest Control grazing animals as biological control agents Society, pp. 135 -7. will increase in future, and ingenuity will find 11.Hartley, M.J., Edmonds, D.K, Phung Hong new ways of controlling weeds. One day, Thai, Popay, A.I. and Sanders, P. (1980). perhaps many farms will use sheep for control- The survival of gorse seedlings under ling grass species not wanted in the following grazing, treading and mowing. Proceedings crop, geese for weed control within the crop, 33rd New Zealand Weed and Pest Control pigs for reducing couch and dock numbers Society, pp. 161 -4. within the system, goats for keeping scrub 12.Hartley, M.J. and Thomson, N.A. (1981). weeds under control, and grass carp for food Effect and control of Californian thistle in and weed control in the fish ponds. dairy pasture. Proceedings New Zealand Grassland Association, 43, 104 -7. References 13.Hartley, M.J., Lyttle, L.A. and Popay, A.I. 1. Amor, R.L. (1987). Non - chemical weed (1984). Control of Californian thistle by control in Victorian dryland cropsthe grazing management. Proceedings 37th dream and the reality. Proceedings 8th Weed and Pest Control Conference, Australian Weeds Conference, pp. 348 -51. pp. 24 -7. 2. Campbell, M.H., Holst, P.J., Auld, B.A. 14.Holst, P.J. and Campbell, M.H. (1987). and Medd, R.W. (1979). Control of three The role of goats in the control of weeds of pasture weeds using goats. Proceedings 7th pastures. In `Temperate Pastures', ed J.L. Conference, of the Asian- Pacific Weed Wheeler, C.J. Pearson and G.E. Robards, Science Society, pp. 201 -5. pp. 262 -3, AWC /CSIRO. 3. Campbell, M.H. and Holst, P.J. (1987). 15.Julien, M.H. (1982). `Biological Control of Control of Illyrian thistle, Onopordum Weeds. A World Catalogue of Agents and illyricum, by goats. Proceedings 8th their Target Weeds'. Commonwealth Australian Weeds Conference, pp. 24 -6. Agricultural Bureaux, Slough. 4. Carter, E.D. (1990). The role of grazing 16.Landgraf, B.K., Fay, P.K. and Haystad, animals in weed control. Proceedings 9th K.M. (1984). Utilization of leafy spurge Proceedings of the First International Weed Control Congress, Melbourne 1992 277

'(Eìiphórbia esula) by sheep. Weed Science Weed and Pest Control Confei'éncé;`pp 32, 348 -52. 117 -21. 17. Liebman, M. and Janke, R.R. (1990). 26. Rosenthal, S.R., Maddox, D.M. and Sustainable weed management practices. In Brunetti, K. (1985). Biological Control `Sustainable agriculturein temperate Methods. In `Principles of weed control in zones' ed C.A. Francis, C.B. Flora and California (California Weed Conference)', L.D. King, pp. 111 -43. John Wiley and pp. 65-94, Thomson Publications, Fresno, Sons, New York. CA. 18. MacGregor, B.A., Reid, C.J. and Scott, 27. Taylor, J.A. (1990). Towards an integrated B.J. (1990). The effect of goats and sheep bracken control technology. In .'Alterna- on the growth, flowering and longevity of tives to the chemical control of weeds', ed tall, medium and short Scotch and arti- C. Bassett, L.J. Whitehouse and J.A. choke thistles. Proceedings 9th Australian Zabkiewicz, pp. 40 -6. Ministry of Forestry, Weeds Conference, pp. 497 -500. FRI Bulletin 155. 19. McKinnon, D. (1982). Angoras clobber 28.Tuckett, A.J. (1961). Giant buttercup... sweet brier. New Zealand Farmer, Septem- Proceedings 14th New Zealand Weed ber 23rd 1982, pp. 17 -22. Control Conference, pp. 124 -6. 20. McLeod, E.J. and Swezey, S.L. (1980). 29. van Zon, J.C.J. (1978). Status of biotic . Survey of weed problems and management agents, other than insects or pathogens; as technologies. Research leaflet, Univ. of biocontrols. Proceedings IV International California Appropriate Technology Pro- Symposium on Biological Control of gram, Davis. Reported in Liebman and Weeds, pp. 245 -50. Janke (1990): 30. Vere, D.T. and Holst, P.J. (1979). The 21. Matthews, L.J. (1975). `Weed control by economics of using goats to control Rubus chemical methods'. Government Printer, fruticosus. Proceedings 7th Conference of Wellington. the Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society, 22. National Research Council. (1989). pp. 207 -9. `Alternative agriculture', National Acad- 31. West, G.G. and Dean, M.G. (1990). The emy of Sciences, Washington D.C. use of livestock to control weeds in New 23. Pierce, J.R. (1987). The use of goats for Zealand forests. In `Alternatives to the control of saffron thistle, Carthamus chemical control of weeds', ed C. Bassett, lanatus L. Proceedings 8th Australian L.J. Whitehouse and J.A. Zabkiewicz, pp. Weeds Conference pp. 31 -4. 128 -132. Ministry of Forestry, FRI Bulletin 24. Reid, R.L. (1981). 'A manual of Australian 155. agriculture', 4th ed, Heinemann, Mel- 32. Wood, G.M. (1987). Animals for biological bourne. brush control. Journal 79, 25. Rolston, M:P., Lambert, M.G., Clark, D.A. 319 -21. and Devantier, B.P. (1981). Control of 33. Wright, R. (1927). Goats and noxious rushes and thistles in pasture by goat and weeds control. New Zealand Journal of

sheep grazing. Proceedings New Zealand Agriculture 35, 295 -7. .