DOCSLIB.ORG

FUTURE ARMOURED VEHICLES SURVIVABILITY 2018 PRE-CONFERENCE FOCUS DAY L 13Th November 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FUTURE ARMOURED VEHICLES SURVIVABILITY 2018 PRE-CONFERENCE FOCUS DAY L 13Th November 2018 FUTURE ARMOURED VEHICLES SURVIVABILITY 2018 PRE-CONFERENCE FOCUS DAY l 13th November 2018 Maximising Development and Integration of Active Protection Systems 9:00 am – 5:00 pm | 13th November 2018 | Copthorne Tara Hotel, London, UK Chaired by Mr. Tom Newbery, Active Protection Research Technical Authority, Platform Survivability Group, DSTL, UK MoD An examination of the current operational environment indicates that future manoeuvre forces must be prepared to fight and win in an increasingly high threat environment. TOPICS COVERED WILL INCLUDE: As seen in ongoing counter-insurgency and hybrid conflicts, threats to the vehicle are increasing in both scope and size. Traditional lightly armed combatants now have access to an increasing array of anti-armour capabilities, from cost • National efforts to integrate APS into effective and lethal RPG 29, to the latest generation of anti-tank guided missiles (ATGM), capable of defeating most of existing fleets the passive protection available to today’s combat vehicles. • The architectures necessary to support Simultaneously, the threat posed by high intensity conflict and near peer adversaries has never been more credible. With integration both the protection and fire power of NATO’s combat vehicles now being challenged and even exceeded in certain areas, proactive measures must be taken to ensure the highest level of protection possible for combat vehicles and their crews. • Technical expertise from industry leaders, covering the latest hard kill/soft Taking place on November 13th and building on the fruitful discussion of active protection systems (APS) at last year’s kill APS, threat detection/tracking and Future Armoured Vehicle’s Survivability 2017, SMi presents a focus day exclusively dedicated to this important capability. countermeasures Drawing on the experience and recent activities of leading programme managers from the armed forces and national • Efforts to ensure system safety and defence research, the meeting will aim to deliberate national efforts to integrate APS into existing fleets, the architectures minimise collateral damage necessary to support integration, efforts to ensure system safety, STANAG 4686 standardisation and much more. • STANAG 4686 standardisation Importantly, the meeting will guarantee the support of technical experts from the leading solution providers, covering the latest hard/soft kill systems, sensors, data processing, munitions and countermeasures. 8.30 Registration & Coffee 12.30 Networking Lunch 8.50 Chairman’s Opening Remarks 1.30 Novel Approaches to Overcome Future Challenges Posed by Autonomous Mr. Tom Newbery, Active Protection Research Technical Authority, Mission Systems Platform Survivability Group, DSTL, UK MoD • Challenges faced by systems integrators for the integration of mission systems which utilise autonomy and artificial intelligence (AI) UK NATIONAL UPDATES • Exploring new thinking and novel autonomous technologies - An insight into the challenges of active protection systems (APS), unmanned 9.00 Research and Procurement of Active Integrated Protection Systems for platforms, and AI enabled weapon systems British Armoured Vehicles • Incorporation of these new technologies, and a shift to greater autonomy • Requirements for enhanced survivability and APS and reduced “man in the loop”, safety and security challenges increase in - Updates from the Multifunctional Self Protection System (MUSS) complexity • Modular Integrated Protection System • Exploring the challenges associated with autonomous mission systems and - Hybridised and modularised capability how we see defence thinking changing to deliver a more capable and agile - Applying open architecture to APS defence force • Infor ming future capability developments through enhanced R&D Mr David Smith, Principal Consultant, Frazer-Nash Consultancy Ltd. Mr. Tom Newbery, Active Protection Research Technical Authority, Mr Trevor Leckie, Senior Consultant, Frazer-Nash Consultancy Ltd. Platform Survivability Group, DSTL, UK MoD 2.00 US Army Armoured Vehicle Protection Suite — Developing Active Protection Systems 9.30 UK Defence Active Protection System Study: An Overview of Outcomes • Modular Active Protection System Programme - breakthroughs and • Investigating the introduction of APS onto legacy and future UK foreseeable challenges to fend off all flying threats armoured vehicle platforms as part of a broader UK Survivability • Technology progression - developing modular, safe, secure, and upgradable strategy products • De-risking introduction of APS: implications and requirements • US Army combat vehicle portfolio and vehicle protection systems integrated • Outcomes of the market analysis and APS requirements, description of into the vehicle combat fleet capability roadmap Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Ramos, Product Manager Vehicle Protection Systems, • How to best prepare the grounds to buy and adopt active protection PEO Ground Combat Systems, Stryker Brigade Combat Team, US Army systems into existing and new platforms • Conclusions of the APS Study 2.30 Rheinmetall Active Protection Suite Major Luke Wilson, Requirements Manager, Royal Engineers, DE&S, UK • Presentation of world’s first APS comparison tool MoD • Quantifiable metrics to determine APS defensive effectiveness • Method to cost-analyse and balance passive armour selection with APS 10.00 Icarus - Progress Towards Modular Integrated Protection System (MIPS) integration Standardisation Dr. Ronald Meixner, Pre-Sales Engineer, Rheinmetall Active Protection GMBH • Receive an unclassified overview of the Icarus Research and (RAP) Demonstration project being conducted by a Leonardo-led team for the UK MoD’s Defence Science & Technology Laboratory 3.00 Developing the Puma’s Active Protection Suite with the MUSS Soft-Kill System • Understand developments in definitions of the MIPS Architecture, its • The Multifunctional self-protection system: performance and feedback from standardisation and associated terminology testing • View examples of simulated engagement scenarios • Missile and laser warning: developing and integrating sensor heads • View extracts from the MIPS System Model and understand its current • Developing an IR Jamming unit scope • Furthering the Puma success story – adding survivability to its lethality and • Understand opportunities to be involved in the ongoing programme mobility abilities Mr. Guy Davies, Capability Manager - Vehicle Systems, Leonardo Mr. Ulrich Faxel, Technical Director, Deputy Programme Manager PUMA, BAAINBw, German MoD 10.30 Morning Coffee 3.30 Afternoon Tea ACTIVE PROTECTION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION 4.00 Sponsor presentation reserved for Raytheon 11.00 Survivability and Protection Presentation details TBC • APS development process - an ongoing misson in MANTAK (The Merkava and Armored Vehicles Directorate) 4.30 Maximising Hard-Kill Active Protection in the Turkish Army - Pulat APS • Insights from Trohpy APS on MBT and heavy APC - An overview of the • Requirements for new high-tech active protection systems • 360-degrees full protection and modular integration use and evolution of the system • Hard-kill abilities and multiple simultaneous threat protection • Challenges and potential for system integration to existing and new • Radar detection, threat neutralisation, and disruption platforms Lieutenant Colonel Kerim Serkan Simais, Specialist-Land Platforms, SSM, Turkish • Testing APS systems MoD Major Aharon, APS Tech Integrator, Israeli MoD ACTIVE PROTECTION STANDARDS AND SAFETY 11.30 Sponsor Presentation Reserved for UTC Presentation details TBC 5.00 NATO STANAG 4686 — Developing and Achieving International Standards for APS Development Amongst NATO Nations 12.00 Speeding-Up US Army Survivability for Combat Vehicles — the Case of • NATO Standardization Agreement 4686: scope of standardization and Modular APS achievements this far • Developing modular active protection systems (MAPS) for the Bradley, • STANAG 4569 and 4686: testing protection and safety Stryker, and Abrams • Integration considerations of APS into legacy equipment and existing fleets • Adapting to the different requirements of each platform based on their • Collateral damage assessment with APS, setting new standards and adapting respective architecture and systems to trial results • Results from “layered testing” and requirements for future efforts Dr. Arild Skjold, Senior Scientist, FFI • T imeframe of MAPS testing and integration into the US Army armoured vehicle fleet 5.30 Chairman’s Closing Remarks and Close of Focus Day Mr. Wayne Beutler, Associate Director Ground Vehicle Survivability and Mr. Tom Newbery, Active Protection Research Technical Authority, Platform Protection, TARDEC, US Army Survivability Group, DSTL, UK MoD www.asdevents.com - www.asdevents.com/event.asp?id=18893 Future Armoured Vehicles Survivability 2018 Day Two | 14th November 2018 8.30 Registration and Coffee PROTECTING ARMOURED PLATFORMS AND CREWS FROM CBRN THREATS 8.50 Chairman’s Opening Remarks Brigadier (ret) Ian Cameron-Mowat, Former Head of Force Protection, British Army 2.00 Delivering Future Ready CBRN Protection for the British Armoured Vehicle Fleet • Emerging requirements for enhanced protection against CBRN KEYNOTE ADDRESSES threats • An update on the developments in the UK CBRN Equipment Capability Plan 9.00 Modernising the Armoured Fleet to Maximise Troop Survivability • Reintegrating the FUCHS area reconnaissance and survey and Enhance Protection in Future Engagements vehicles into the British Land Forces • Recent requirements
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table 1 British Armored Car Vehicle Name/WD Serial Number Listing by Kevin Tucker Armored Car Type WD WD Number Name Sqn / Troop Aos Regiment / Unit Date Location
    Table 1 British Armored Car Vehicle Name/WD Serial Number Listing by Kevin Tucker Armored Car Type WD WD Number Name Sqn / Troop AoS Regiment / Unit Date Location AEC, Armoured Car Mk I F 55010 1942 Western Desert AEC, Armoured Car Mk II F 83573 1943 UK AEC, Armoured Car Mk II F 88579 AEC, Armoured Car Mk II F 88581 AEC, Armoured Car Mk III F 89067 44 1st Royal Dragoons, 12th Corps 1944 Holland AEC, Armoured Car Mk III F 88707 D Sqn 44 2nd Household Cavalry Regiment, VIII Corps AEC, Armoured Car Mk III F 88827 AEC, Armoured Car Mk III F 88908 AEC, Armoured Car Mk III F 88984 Beaverette M 4816486 Beaverette, Mk II M 431616 Recce Unit 1st Polish Corps UK Beaverette, Mk II F 1293049 Recce Unit 1st Polish Corps UK Beaverette, Mk II F 1293060 Recce Unit 1st Polish Corps 1941 GB Beaverette, Mk II F 16895x Recce Unit 1st Polish Corps UK Beaverette, Mk II M 4316xx Recce Unit 1st Polish Corps UK Beaverette, Mk III M 4473350 Chevrolet, C15TA CZ 4287945 52 10th Armoured Regiment, Fort Garry Horse, 2nd Canadian Armoured Brigade, 5th Canadian Armoured Division 1945 Holland Chevrolet, C15TA CZ 4288056 52 10th Armoured Regiment, Fort Garry Horse, 2nd Canadian Armoured Brigade, 5th Canadian Armoured Division 1945 Holland Chevrolet, C15TA CZ 4288170 52 10th Armoured Regiment, Fort Garry Horse, 2nd Canadian Armoured Brigade, 5th Canadian Armoured Division 1945 Holland Chevrolet, C15TA CZ 4288212 52 10th Armoured Regiment, Fort Garry Horse, 2nd Canadian Armoured Brigade, 5th Canadian Armoured Division 1945 Holland Chevrolet, C15TA CZ 4288020 Royal Hamilton
    [Show full text]
  • LWD 3-3-4, Employment of Armour 2016
    Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Contents Land Warfare Doctrine 3-3-4 Employment of Armour 2016 This publication supersedes Land Warfare Doctrine 3-3-4, Employment of Armour, 2009. Contents Contents ©This work is copyright. Contents Contents Australian Army Land Warfare Doctrine LWD 3-3-4 Employment of Armour 2016 © Commonwealth of Australia (Australian Army) 2016 11 November 2016 Issued by command of Chief of Army MJ Constable Colonel Commandant Combined Arms Training Centre Contents Contents Preface Aim The aim of this publication is to describe the capabilities of armour in order to provide an understanding of their contribution to the comprehensive range of military activities within a ‘whole-of-government’ approach to national security. Level This publication is written for new members of the Army. It provides corps non-specialists with an understanding of the capabilities of the organisation and its raise, train and sustain role. This publication is a useful reference for government and non-government agencies working with the Army. This publication provides application-level doctrine. This is the capstone publication for armour as part of the Land Warfare Doctrine Operations series. This publication describes the employment of this corps. This publication complements Land Warfare Doctrine 3-0, Operations and Land Warfare Doctrine 3-0-3, Formation Tactics. Detailed tactics, techniques and procedures are provided in the Land Warfare Procedures - Combat Arms (Mounted Combat) series. Scope This publication provides
    [Show full text]
  • Allied Armor in Normandy Allied Armor in Normandy
    ALLIED ARMOR IN NORMANDY ALLIED ARMOR IN NORMANDY YVES BUFFETAUT An unusually idyllic view of the landings: the LCTS have come close to shore on calm seas with no German opposition. This photograph was not taken on the Normandy coasts on June 6, in NNW force 6 winds, but in England, during a large-scale rehearsal. Contents page image: British Sherman crews waiting to embark. Shoreham and Portsmouth were the main embarkation ports for the British, while the Americans could be found farther west, notably at Portland, which served the 1st U.S. Infantry Division, and Torquay and Dartmouth, which served the 4th U.S. Infantry Division. (IWM H 38986) Contents page map: August 6, 1944, HQ Twelfth Army Group situation map. (Library of Congress, Geography and Map Division) CIS0004 Print Edition: ISBN 978-1-61200-6079 Digital Edition: ISBN 978-1-61200-6086 Kindle Edition: ISBN 978-1-61200-6086 This book is published in cooperation with and under license from Sophia Histoire & Collections. Originally published in French as Militaria Hors-Serie No 52, © Histoire & Collections 2004 Typeset, design and additional material © Casemate Publishers 2018 Translation by Hannah McAdams Design by Paul Hewitt, Battlefield Design Color illustrations by Jean Restayn © Histoire & Collections Infographics by Jean-Marie Mongin © Histoire & Collections Photo retouching and separations by Remy Spezzano Additional text by Chris Cocks CASEMATE PUBLISHERS (US) Telephone (610) 853-9131 Fax (610) 853-9146 Email: [email protected] www.casematepublishers.com CASEMATE
    [Show full text]
  • British Second Army at Normandy
    U.S. and British Army Task Organization Operation OVERLORD: 6 June 1944 21st Army Group LONDON 6 Jun 1944 ANNEX A: Task Organization to Operation OVERLORD 21st Army Group Gen Bernard L. MONTGOMERY U.S. First Army LtGen Omar N. BRADLEY VII Corps UTAH Beach MajGen J. Lawton COLLINS 4th Infantry Division MajGen Raymond O. BARTON 82nd Airborne Division MajGen Matthew B. RIDGWAY 101st Airborne Division MajGen Maxwell D. TAYLOR V Corps OMAHA Beach MajGen Leonard T. GEROW 1st Infantry Division MajGen Clarence R. HUEBNER 29th Infantry Division MajGen Charles H. GERHARDT British Second Army LtGen Sir Miles C. DEMPSEY I Corps SWORD Beach and JUNO Beach LtGen J.T. CROCKER 3rd London Infantry Division (REIN) MajGen Thomas G. RENNIE 3rd Canadian Infantry Division (REIN) MajGen R.F.L. KELLER 6th Airborne Division MajGen Richard N. “Windy” GALE 51st Highland Infantry Division MajGen D. Charles BULLEN-SMITH XXX Corps GOLD Beach LtGen G.C. BUCKNALL 50th Northumbrian Infantry Division (REIN) MajGen D.A.H. GRAHAM Prepared by: [email protected] 3rd London Division SHOREHAM 1 June 1944 ANNEX A: Task Organization to Operation OVERLORD 3rd London Division MajGen Thomas G. RENNIE (WIA 13 Jun), Brig E.E.E. CASS (13 Jun), MajGen L.G. “Bolo” WHISTLER (23 Jun) 8th Infantry Brigade Brig E.E.E. “Copper” CASS, LtCol M.A. FOSTER (13 Jun) Brig E.E.E. CASS (23 Jun) 1st Bn, The Suffolk Regiment LtCol R.E. “Dick” GOODWIN 2nd Bn, East Yorkshire Regiment LtCol C.F. HUTCHINSON (WIA 6 Jun), LtCol DICKSON 1st Bn, South Lancashire Regiment (Prince of Wales Volunteers) LtCol J.E.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ADF Capability Snapshot 2015: Army
    STRATEGIC STRATEGIC INSIGHTS ADF capability snapshot 2015 Part 3—Army 100 Andrew Davies This paper surveys the capabilities of the Australian Army and is an update of previous reviews in 2008 and 2010. Other papers in this series update the corresponding reports on Royal Australian Air Force, Royal Australian Navy and a future paper will examine C4ISR (command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) capabilities. Army capability summary The main focus of the Australian Army over the past 15 years has been on sustaining combat, training, stabilisation and peacekeeping operations in our near region and the Middle East and Afghanistan theatres. The demands of the ADF’s operational tempo have driven a major rethinking of the structure of the Army under Plan Beersheba. Now well advanced, the end state will be three essentially similar brigades, which will make rotational deployments easier to manage and sustain. Like the RAAF and the RAN, described in previous reports in this series, the Army needs a major recapitalisation of its equipment. An ASLAV (Australian Light Armoured Vehicle) fires on a target at Puckapunyal training area during Exercise Chong Ju, a live-fire training exercise by the Combined Arms Training Centre, on 21 October 2015. Photo courtesy Department of Defence. November 2015 2 ADF capability snapshot 2015: Part 3—Army The replacement of the Army’s fleet of vehicles is now underway. The requirement for protected mobility for deployed forces has increased as the sophistication and capabilities of both contemporary militaries and non-state actors have increased. Soft-skinned vehicles are particularly vulnerable to even small improvised explosive devices (IEDs).
    [Show full text]
  • The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle
    Canadian Military History Volume 20 Issue 3 Article 9 2011 The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle Ed Storey Canadian Expeditionary Forces Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Recommended Citation Storey, Ed "The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle." Canadian Military History 20, 3 (2011) This Feature is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Storey: Light Armoured Vehicle The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle Ed Storey s a military vehicle enthusiast make them cost effective and easier AI was quite excited to see the Abstract: In order to understand the to deploy. article by Frank Maas in Canadian purchase of military vehicles, one must The AVGP series of vehicles Military History dealing with the understand the vehicle and where it falls purchased by Canada in 1976 was in the evolution of vehicle procurement. Canadian Light Armoured Vehicle This article, written in response to an a 10.7 ton, 6 wheeled amphibious (LAV) series of vehicles (vol.20, earlier article in Canadian Military vehicle based on the Swiss Mowag no.2 Spring 2011). I was also keenly History by Frank Maas, examines the Piranha I. Canada bought three interested in the article as my Father chronology and motivations behind versions: the Cougar 76 mm Fire was stationed at CFB Petawawa in the Canadian acquisition of wheeled Support Vehicle, the Grizzly armoured fighting vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Operations
    Land Operations Land Warfare Development Centre Army Doctrine Publication AC 71940 HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS & CONDITIONS OF RELEASE COPYRIGHT This publication is British Ministry of Defence Crown copyright. Material and information contained in this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system and transmitted for MOD use only, except where authority for use by other organisations or individuals has been authorised by a Patent Officer of the Defence Intellectual Property Rights whose details appear below. Crown copyright and Merchandise Licensing, Defence Intellectual Property rights, Central Legal Services, MOD Abbeywood South, Poplar 2 #2214, Bristol BS34 8JH, Email: [email protected] STATUS This publication has been produced under the direction and authority of the Chief of the General Staff by ACOS Warfare branch in his capacity as sponsor of Army Doctrine. It is the individual’s responsibility to ensure that he or she is using the latest version of this publication. If in doubt the individual should contact the Warfare Branch of HQ Field Army (details below). The contents constitute mandatory regulations or an MOD Approved Code of Practice (ACOP) and provide clear military information concerning the most up to date experience and best practice available for commanders and troops to use for operations and training. To avoid criminal liability and prosecution for a breach of health and safety law, you must follow the relevant provisions of the ACOP. Breaches or omissions could result in disciplinary action under the provisions of the Armed Forces Act. DISTRIBUTION As directed by ACOS Warfare. CONTACT DETAILS Suggestions for change or queries are welcomed and should be sent to Warfare Branch Editor, Headquarters Field Army, Land Warfare Development Centre, Imber Road, Warminster BA12 0DJ | i Foreword CGS Foreword to ADP Land Operations ADP Land Operations is the British Army’s core doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • Project LAND 400: Defining the Army 126
    STRATEGIC STRATEGIC INSIGHTS Project LAND 400: defining the army 126 Ben Coleman Spend enough time in a queue for coffee at Defence’s Russell Offices and you’re sure to hear some Army folk complaining about how the land forces are chronically short-changed for modern equipment compared to the Air Force and Navy. But a glance at Chapter 6 of the 2016 Integrated Investment Program shows that they’ll need to find something else to grizzle about.1 Defence’s most comprehensive, and expensive, package of land force modernisation is underway, at a cost of $50–70 billion.2 Nine complementary programs cover every area of land warfare, from personal equipment for the soldiers through to unmanned aerial vehicles, amphibious craft, special forces helicopters, digital networks, surface-to-air missiles and long-range battlefield rocket systems. Moreover, those programs are in addition to Navy and Air Force projects, such as sea and air lift, that directly support the land force. Among these programmatic riches, the jewel in the crown is Project Land 400, through which Defence intends to replace the Army’s fleets of armoured cavalry vehicles (ASLAVs) and M113 armoured personnel carriers (APCs). According to Defence, the project will deliver the Army’s next generation of armoured fighting vehicles, with the firepower, protection and mobility to defeat increasingly lethal and adaptive adversaries well into the future. A BAE Systems Australia Patria AMV35 (left) and a Rheinmetall Boxer CRV (right) drive through the armoured fighting vehicle field firing training area at Puckapunyal Range, Victoria, while participating in the Land 400 risk mitigation activity on 22 February 2017 © Images courtesy Australian Department of Defence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the 7Th Canadian Reconnaissance Regiment in Normandy and the Scheldt
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2019-04-17 The Development of the 7th Canadian Reconnaissance Regiment in Normandy and the Scheldt McGowan, Victoria McGowan, V. (2019). The development of the 7th Canadian Reconnaissance Regiment in Normandy and the Scheldt (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/110177 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY The Development of the 7th Canadian Reconnaissance Regiment in Normandy and the Scheldt by Victoria McGowan A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY CALGARY, ALBERTA APRIL, 2019 © Victoria McGowan 2019 !ii Abstract The 7th Canadian Reconnaissance Regiment was created in 1939 to provide field reconnaissance for 3rd Canadian Infantry Division in the Second World War. Despite being present at a number of significant engagements, it has been overlooked by historians. Many assumptions have been made about armoured reconnaissance, including a belief that reconnaissance regiments were mostly or entirely support units, rather than combat units. This study aims to show that the 7th played an important role in the combat operations of 3rd Division in Northwest Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • (AVF0005) 1 Written Evidence Submitted by Brigadier
    (AVF0005) Written evidence submitted by Brigadier (Retired) BW Barry OBE Senior Fellow Land Warfare International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) INQUIRY INTO BRITISH ARMOURED VEHICLE CAPABILITY HCDC is conducting an inquiry that “will focus on the procurement and use of Armoured Fighting Vehicles (AFVs) and ask whether more must be done to ensure the Army’s ability to deploy an armoured division.”i This submission provides analysis to assist in answering this question and subordinate questions including: - “Whether the Army is currently on track to be able to field the Strike Brigades and armoured division in line with the recommendations of the 2015 SDSR”. - “Whether the Army will be able to match the potential threat posed by peer adversaries by 2025” - The 13 more detailed questions listed at the Call for evidence.ii It is based on IISS analysis of global armoured warfare capabilities published in the annual IISS Military Balance and data held in the Military Balance+ database, as well as a strong body of analysis of recent, current, and future wars and the roles of AFVs in conflict. It does not look beyond 2030. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Armoured warfare is a capability of great relevance, both currently and in the future. Based on data held by the Military Balance+ database, some 250,000 AFVs are in service globally. Most current British Army AFVs are either obsolete or approaching obsolescence. Together with the introduction of the Ajax and Boxer AFVs, the Army’s plans to upgrade Challenger and Warrior have the potential for a transformational enhancement to British armoured warfare capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • No Shortage of Tanks!: the Canadian Army’S System for the Recovery, Repair and Replacement of a and B Vehicles and Major Weapons Systems
    Canadian Military History Volume 27 Issue 1 Article 1 2018 No Shortage of Tanks!: The Canadian Army’s System for the Recovery, Repair and Replacement of A and B Vehicles and Major Weapons Systems Arthur Gullachsen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Gullachsen, Arthur "No Shortage of Tanks!: The Canadian Army’s System for the Recovery, Repair and Replacement of A and B Vehicles and Major Weapons Systems." Canadian Military History 27, 1 (2018) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gullachsen: No Shortage of Tanks! No Shortage of Tanks! The Canadian Army’s System for the Recovery, Repair and Replacement of A and B Vehicles and Major Weapons Systems ARTHUR GULLACHSEN Abstract : This article is an overview of the First Canadian Army in North West Europe’s ability to recover, repair and damaged, destroyed and broken down vehicles and weapons systems. This capability was a crucial factor in maintaining the overall combat power of the Canadian Army Overseas during operations in the last year of war. To support this argument the author examines Canadian wartime primary documents as well as multiple secondary sources. IVEN THE HIGH INTENSITY of combat operations during the GCanadian Army’s period of service in North West Europe (NWE) during the last eleven months of the war in 1944-1945, an effective system of equipment recovery, repair and replacement was essential.
    [Show full text]
  • The SA Army: Mandate, Activities, Main Equipment and Key Personalities
    Chapter 9 The SA Army: mandate, activities, main equipment and key personalities The SA Army was established just after midnight on the morning of April 27, 1994 as the senior Service of the new SA National Defence Force. Its seniority derives not as much from history but from the Defence Act, 42 of 2004, which in Section 12(1) lists the SA Army first, followed by the SA Air Force, SA Navy and the SA Military Health Service, thereby setting an order of precedence. For reasons of history and geography what is now the SA Army has always been the largest Service – and will remain that way. The geo-economics of the continent has always suggested to the Navy that South Africa has an island economy, with most of its trade with partners across the sea. As a result, they have always advocated the need for a strong navy. Understandable, of course – even though the Germans and Japanese excepted (the first during both world wars, the latter during the last) – there has never been a significant threat to that trade. For South Africa, the threat has always been on land – for successive colonial/white governments the “black peril”, for the present incumbents, the peril instability poses for development. What is the mandate of the SA Army? The mandate of the SA Army is • to provide combat-ready land forces for – o the pursuance of national defence and the prevention of war, failing which, to jointly and preferably multi-nationally, swiftly and decisively achieve national security goals; and o collaboratively promoting peace and stability internally and externally in concurrence with international obligations; and • to contribute to the development and upliftment of South Africa, its people, and the African continent.
    [Show full text]