DOCSLIB.ORG

Designing a Comprehensive Peace Process for Afghanistan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Designing a Comprehensive Peace Process for Afghanistan [PEACEW RKS [ DESIGNING A COMPREHENSIVE PEACE PROCESS FOR AFGHANISTAN Lisa Schirch, with contributions from Aziz Rafiee,N ilofar Sakhi, and Mirwais Wardak PW75_Cover_3a.indd 1 9/13/11 10:27:11 AM [PEACEW RKS [ ABOUT THE REPO R T This report, sponsored by the Center for Conflict Management at the U.S. Institute of Peace, draws on comparative research literature on peace processes to identify lessons applicable to Afghanistan and makes recommendations to the international community, the Afghan government, and Afghan civil society for ensuring a more comprehensive, successful, and sustainable peace process. Research for this paper was undertaken during five trips to Kabul, Afghanistan, and one trip to Pakistan between 2009 and 2011. Funding for the research in the report came from the Ploughshares Fund and Afghanistan: Pathways to Peace, a project of Peacebuild: The Canadian Peacebuilding Network. ABOUT THE AUTHO R Lisa Schirch is director of 3P Human Security, a partnership for peacebuilding policy. 3P Human Security connects policymakers with global civil society networks, facilitates civil-military dialogue, and provides a peacebuilding lens on current policy issues. She is also a research professor at the Center for Justice and Peacebuilding at Eastern Mennonite University and a policy adviser for the Alliance for Peacebuilding. A former Fulbright Fellow in East and West Africa, Schirch has worked in more than twenty countries in conflict prevention and peacebuilding. Schirch has written four books and numerous articles on conflict prevention and strategic peacebuilding. Photo taken by members of Peace Studies Network of Department of Peace Studies (NCPR) from Psychology and Educational Sciences Faculty of Kabul University in 2009. Used with permission of the National Center for Policy Research. The views expressed in this report are those of the author alone. They do not necessarily reflect views of the United States Institute of Peace, and do not rep- resent official positions of the United States Government. United States Institute of Peace 2301 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20037 Phone: 202.457.1700 Fax: 202.429.6063 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.usip.org Peaceworks No. 75 First published 2011 © 2011 by the United States Institute of Peace PW75_Cover_3a.indd 2 9/13/11 10:27:11 AM CONTENTS PEACEWORKS • SEPTEMBER 2011 • NO. 75 Summary ... 3 From “Peace Talks” to a “Comprehensive Peace Process” ... 5 The Case for a Comprehensive Peace Process ... 6 The “Who” of an Afghan Peace Process: Key Stakeholders ... 8 The “What” of an Afghan Peace Process: A Negotiation Framework ... 12 The “How” of an Afghan Peace Process: Mechanisms for Structuring Public Input, Technical Support, and Coordination ... 22 Conclusion and Recommendations ... 33 [ Peace processes that include a wider range of voices are more likely to lead to success, legitimacy, sustainability, and democratic governance. ] DESIGNING A COMPREHENSIVE PEACE PROCESS FOR AFGHANISTAN Summary ■ Current negotiations to end the war in Afghanistan fail to build on lessons learned from peace processes in other countries. Exclusion of key stakeholders, especially diverse sectors of civil society, and exclusion of key issues underlying the current conflict create a recipe for failure. In addition, the exclusive focus on either top-down negotiation between armed groups or bottom-up reintegration based on financial incentives is insufficient. ■ Half of all peace agreements fail in part because too few people support them. History shows a peace process is more likely to succeed if it includes a wide spectrum of armed and unarmed actors. Building a national consensus to transition from war to peace in Afghanistan requires participation by diverse stakeholders. ■ Current negotiations focus on a narrow agenda on conditions for the Taliban to lay down their arms and for the United States to leave Afghanistan. This agenda does not address significant root causes of the current conflict, such as government corruption and ethnic tensions. ■ A comprehensive Afghan peace process would orchestrate work in three areas: developing a politically negotiated settlement, increasing legitimacy for the Afghan government, and building a national public consensus on the future relations between diverse groups. ■ An Afghan peace process requires creating, coordinating, and sequencing a set of struc- tured mechanisms, forums, and negotiation tables for participatory deliberation and decision making involving diverse stakeholders, regional countries, and all levels of Afghan society. A successful peace process combines high-level negotiation with “vertical” processes that link high-level negotiations with public dialogue processes in a way that is transparent, impartial, and inclusive. ■ A comprehensive peace process in Afghanistan requires a much more deliberate design than currently exists. The hope of a quick and tight negotiation process is as illusory as the fantasy that firepower will achieve victory for either side in Afghanistan. 3 DESIGNING A COMPREHENSIVE PEACE PROCESS FOR AFGHANISTAN From “Peace Talks” to a “Comprehensive Peace Process” The transition from war to peace in Afghanistan requires much more than high-level nego- tiations and low-level reintegration efforts. The current negotiation agenda between U.S. and Taliban representatives holds potential for establishing conditions for an end to the war. Yet it does not lay a foundation for a sustainable peace. The current approach muffles other critical conflicts that are obstacles to peace in Afghanistan and the region and overlooks Afghan civil society’s capacity to support a national peace process. The June 2010 National Consultative Peace Jirga called for the creation of a National Peace Council and a redesign of reintegration efforts in the new Afghan Peace and Reconciliation Program (APRP). Noting concerns about the lack of democratic representation first in the Peace Jirga and later in the National Peace Council, civil society leaders continue to flag the exclusion of public interests in current peace talks.1 Public participation in a comprehensive peace process is an essential component for successful transition from war to a stable peace.2 Half of all peace agreements fail—and once they fail, the underlying conflicts have an even greater chance of becoming intractable. In the history of successful transitions from war to peace, one lesson is clear: go slow to go fast. Rushed peace processes that limit or exclude public participation and interests are more likely to fail than those that build a solid foundation for a sustainable peace. Too often international diplomats seem to throw all of their eggs in one basket with high-level peace negotiations to achieve a quick settlement. When these efforts fail to produce immediate outcomes, the stakeholders return to the battlefield convinced that diplomacy was tried and exhausted. Peace agreements thrown together quickly often unravel in a way that results in an even longer process, less trust among key stakeholders, more costs to the international community, and more death and destruction on the ground. The jumble of terminology in Afghanistan fogs the complicated landscape of peace ef- forts. (For purposes of this report, the definitions found in box 1 are used.) In Afghanistan, the concept of “reconciliation” often refers to high-level negotiations between the Taliban, Karzai government, and international forces.3 But in other contexts, such as in South Africa, rec- onciliation has traditionally referred to a national civil society–led process following official, political negotiations. More recently, media reports signal that there are high-level “peace talks” under way. Peace talks aim to reach a “peace agreement,” a statement that would lay out the conditions and steps for a transition from armed struggle to a politically negotiated process. The term “reintegration” refers to low-level disarmament efforts to entice foot soldiers with jobs programs and other economic incentives. And at the same time, Afghan civil society calls for a national “transitional justice process” with an agenda contrasting from that found in the formal peace talks. All of these terms and processes have a place within an Afghan comprehen- sive peace process. A “comprehensive peace process” is distinct in that it includes a much wider array of activi- ties, actors, and forums aimed at achieving peace.4 Comprehensive peace processes are mul- tilevel, dynamic efforts to build a public consensus around a shared future. A peace process may or may not lead to a peace agreement. In Afghanistan, for example, a comprehensive peace process could help address root causes of the conflict whether or not a peace agreement between the country’s armed, political, and ethnic groups ever materializes. Building a national consensus on the country’s future among civil society could aid in achieving a political settle- ment between armed groups. A comprehensive peace process requires a careful look at who participates in a peace process, what issues are on the table, and how the process is structured. In short, a comprehensive peace process requires creating structures for wide participation and 5 PEACEWORKS 75 Box 1. Definition of Terms Reintegration refers to low-level efforts to offer incentives to disarm and return armed individuals to community life. Reconciliation refers to a process between conflicting groups to understand core griev- ances and identify mutually satisfying solutions with the goal of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2008 Human Rights Report: Afghanistan Page 1 of 29
    2008 Human Rights Report: Afghanistan Page 1 of 29 2008 Human Rights Report: Afghanistan BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR 2008 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices February 25, 2009 Afghanistan is an Islamic republic with a population of approximately 32 million. Under its new constitution, citizens elected Hamid Karzai president in 2004 and the following year selected a new parliament; although the elections did not fully meet international standards for free and fair elections, citizens perceived the outcomes as acceptable, and the elections established the basis for democratic development at the federal and regional levels. A continuing insurgency hindered the government's capacity to govern effectively in several areas of the country. Although civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces, there were instances in which elements of the security forces acted independently. The country's human rights record remained poor. Human rights problems included extrajudicial killings; torture; poor prison conditions; official impunity; prolonged pretrial detention; restrictions on freedom of the press; restrictions on freedom of religion; violence and societal discrimination against women; restrictions on religious conversions; abuses against minorities; sexual abuse of children; trafficking in persons; abuse of worker rights; and child labor. Although the government deepened its authority in provincial centers, Taliban or factions operating outside government control exercised authority in some areas. During the year more than 6,340 persons died as a result of the insurgency, including deaths by suicide attacks and roadside bombs, in contrast to 2007, when more than 6,500 persons died. The majority of the casualties were insurgent fighters killed in combat.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating Peace in Sierra Leone: Confronting the Justice Challenge
    Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue rDecembeerp 2007 ort Negotiating peace in Sierra Leone: Confronting the justice challenge Priscilla Hayner Report The Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue is an independent and impartial foundation, Contents based in Geneva, that promotes and facilitates 1. Introduction and overview 5 dialogue to resolve armed conflicts and reduce civilian suffering. 2. Background to the 1999 talks 8 114, rue de lausanne 3. Participation in the Lomé talks: April–July 1999 10 ch-1202 geneva 4. Amnesty in the Lomé process and Accord 12 switzerland The context 12 [email protected] t: + 41 22 908 11 30 Rapid agreement on a blanket amnesty 13 f: +41 22 908 11 40 A second look at the amnesty: was it unavoidable? 16 www.hdcentre.org The amnesty and the UN and other international participants 17 © Copyright 5. Other justice issues at Lomé 19 Henry Dunant Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, 2007 A Truth and Reconciliation Commission 19 Reproduction of all or Provisions for reparations 20 part of this publication The security forces and demobilisation of combatants 20 may be authorised only Reaching an agreement on power-sharing 21 with written consent and acknowledgement of the 6. After the agreement: a difficult peace 22 source. Slow implementation and near collapse of the accord 23 The International Center The Special Court for Sierra Leone 25 for Transitional Justice Implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission 26 assists countries pursuing Judicial reform efforts 28 accountability for past mass Creation of a new Human Rights Commission 28 atrocity or human rights abuse. It assists in the development Demobilisation, and reform of the armed forces and police 29 of integrated, comprehensive, and localized approaches to 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Analysis of Liberia
    Conflict analysis of Liberia February 2014 Siân Herbert About this report This rapid review provides a short synthesis of the literature on conflict and peace in Liberia. It aims to orient policymakers to the key debates and emerging issues. It was prepared for the European Commission’s Instrument for Stability, © European Union 2014. The views expressed in this report are those of the author, and do not represent the opinions or views of the European Union, the GSDRC, or the partner agencies of the GSDRC. The author extends thanks to Dr Mats Utas (The Nordic Africa Institute), who acted as consultant and peer reviewer for this report. Expert contributors Dr Thomas Jaye (Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre) Diego Osorio (former United Nations Mission in Liberia) Dr Sukanya Podder (Cranfield University) Dr Alexander Ramsbotham (Conciliation Resources) Eric Werker (Harvard Business School) Craig Lamberton (USAID) Julia Escalona (USAID) Tiana Martin (USAID) Suggested citation Herbert, S. (2014). Conflict analysis of Liberia. Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham. About GSDRC GSDRC is a partnership of research institutes, think-tanks and consultancy organisations with expertise in governance, social development, humanitarian and conflict issues. We provide applied knowledge services on demand and online. Our specialist research team supports a range of international development agencies, synthesising the latest evidence and expert thinking to inform policy and practice. GSDRC, International Development Department, College of Social Sciences University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK www.gsdrc.org [email protected] Conflict analysis of Liberia Contents 1. Overview 1 2. Conflict and violence profile 2 3. Principal domestic actors 4 3.1 Political personalities and parties 3.2 Principal security actors 3.3 Ex-combatants and ex-commanders 3.4 Civil society organisations 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Paix Sans Frontières Building Peace Across Borders
    ISSUE ISSUE 22 Accord 22 Accord edited by an international review of peace initiatives Alexander Ramsbotham Paix sans frontières and I William Zartman 2011 building peace across borders ISSUE Paix sans frontières Armed confl ict does not respect political or territorial 22 22 boundaries. It forms part of wider, regional confl ict systems. building peace But there is a policy gap across borders and in borderlands 2011 where statehood and diplomacy can struggle to reach, across borders as confl ict response strategies still focus on the nation state as the central unit of analysis and intervention. This twenty-second publication in Conciliation Resources’ Accord series addresses this gap. It looks at how peacebuilding strategies and capacity can ‘think outside the state’: beyond the state, through regional engagement, and below it, through cross-border community or trade networks. building peace across borders across peace building “In many of today’s wars, violence is driven in part by cross- border regional confl ict dynamics. And, as this important new publication from Conciliation Resources makes clear, failure to take the regional dimension of civil wars into account increases the risk that peacebuilding strategies will fail. What is needed, in addition to the statebuilding policies that are now de rigeur in post-confl ict environments, are strategies that address cross- border confl ict dynamics with the relevant regional states and cross-border communal engagement.” Andrew Mack, Director of the Human Security Report Project (HSRP) at Simon Fraser University and a faculty member of the university’s School for International Studies. Conciliation Resources is an international non-governmental organisation that works in fragile and confl ict-affected states to prevent violence, promote justice and transform confl ict into opportunities for development.
    [Show full text]
  • Media-Watch-English-Report-91.Pdf
    1 Preamble: Over the past ten years, media organizations and reporting associations have struggled to bring awareness to the problem of violence against journalists in Afghanistan because there has been no comprehensive study done on the problem. During the last decade, a high number of Afghan reporters have lost their liveswhile working as professional journalists, but yet none of these cases has been pursued in an impartial manner through the judicial system. With no legal pursuit of these cases of murdered or harassed journalists, criminals and enemies of freedom of speech are more likely to continue their crimes against journalism and the media. However a few years ago, six Afghan reporters received awards and appreciation letters for their courage to stand up for the country’s freedom of speech. This is proof that despite many challenges facing the media and reporters in Afghanistan the media as a whole is defending their rights in a dangerous region. The information awareness duties for the media in a community where the war and insecurity has affected the sanctity of life is crucial. Unfortunately, most of local rulers and government officials are unable to understand the value of media and the freedom of expression. Afghanistan is a country where injustice, corruption and a total lack of rule of law is considered normal life. Given these serious hazards, the work of reporters to criticize government officials and warlords can be very dangerous. Despite all these challenges, the country’s open media has the ability towin the confidence of the people and their audiences. Currently, the people in order to gain information first refer to the internal media and then to external media.
    [Show full text]
  • Unhcr Eligibility Guidelines for Assessing the International Protection Needs of Asylum-Seekers from Afghanistan
    UNHCR ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING THE INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION NEEDS OF ASYLUM-SEEKERS FROM AFGHANISTAN United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) July 2009 NOTE UNHCR Eligibility Guidelines are issued by the Office to assist decision-makers, including UNHCR staff, Governments and private practitioners, in assessing the international protection needs of asylum-seekers from a given country. They are authoritative legal interpretations of the refugee criteria in respect of specific groups on the basis of objectively assessed social, political, economic, security, human rights and humanitarian conditions in the country of origin concerned. The pertinent protection needs are analyzed in detail and recommendations made as to how the applications in question should be decided upon in line with the relevant principles and criteria of refugee law as per, notably, the 1951 Convention and its 1967 Protocol, the UNHCR Statute and relevant regional instruments such as the Cartagena Declaration, the 1969 OAU Convention and the EU Asylum Directives. The recommendations may also touch upon, as relevant, complementary or subsidiary protection regimes. UNHCR issues its Eligibility Guidelines pursuant to its responsibility to promote the accurate interpretation and application of the above-mentioned refugee criteria as envisaged by Article 8 of its Statute, Article 35 of the 1951 Convention and Article II of its 1967 Protocol and based on the expertise it has developed over several years in eligibility and refugee status determination matters. It is expected that the positions and guidance contained in the Guidelines should be weighed heavily by the relevant decision-making authorities in reaching a decision on the asylum applications concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Dialogue for Peace Reflections and Lessons from Community Peace Platforms in the Mano River Region
    Fall 08 Discussion paper Nov 2016 Dialogue for Peace Reflections and lessons from community peace platforms in the Mano River region NGO partners This project has been implemented in partnership with the following national NGOs: ABC Development is a registered NGO in Guinea, established in 1998. It is a member of the West Africa Action on Small Arms and WANEP in Guinea. In partnership with Conciliation Resources, ABC Development set up the DPD in Forécariah, which has led dialogue between mining companies and communities in the surrounding region. Institute for Research and Democratic Development (IREDD) was founded in Liberia in 2000 (as the Liberia Democratic Institute) and serves on several civil society networks in Liberia that engage in policy influencing. It works to strengthen citizens’ voices and engender a culture of local participation in policy development and implementation. Network Movement for Justice and Development (NMJD) in Sierra Leone is an advocacy and peacebuilding national civil society organisation, established in 1988. It has a wide range of experiences working in partnership with national and international institutions to build capacities, create and influence policies on mining, governance, peace and security and youth empowerment. West Africa Network for Peacebuilding–Côte d’Ivoire (WANEP-CI) is the Ivorian branch of WANEP, a leading regional peacebuilding organisation founded in 1998 operating in every ECOWAS member state. WANEP is experienced in bringing people together through dialogue platforms to promote
    [Show full text]
  • Murdered Journalists: 90% of Killers Get Away with It but Who Are the Victims?
    Murdered journalists: 90% of killers get away with it but who are the victims? With 370 dead over 10 years, governments need to do more to catch the killers, says the Committee to Protect Journalist • Nils Horner’s death highlights lack of justice for those murdered at work • Greenslade: 90% of journalists’ murderers across the world escape justice • theguardian.com, Monday 3 November 2014 21.10 AEST The 683 journalists murdered since 1992 Photograph: CPJ data A grim toll of 370 journalists have been murdered over the past 10 years in direct retaliation for doing their job. An even more alarming statistic is that 90% of their killers have not been brought to justice, according to statistics from the Committee to Protect Journalists. In its report, The road to justice: breaking the cycle of impunity in the killing of journalists, the CPJ argues that governments need to do much more to catch the killers. Journalists murdered between 2004 and 2013 with full justice: Brazil Samuel Romã, Radio Conquista FM, April 20, 2004 Luiz Carlos Barbon Filho, Jornal do Porto, JC Regional, and Rádio Porto FM, May 5, 2007 Dominican Republic Juan Emilio Andújar Matos, Radio Azua and Listín Diario, September 14, 2004 El Salvador Christian Gregorio Poveda Ruiz, freelance, September 2, 2009 Indonesia Anak Agung Prabangsa, Radar Bali, February 11, 2009 Nicaragua María José Bravo, La Prensa, November 9, 2004 Peru Miguel Pérez Julca, Radio Éxitos, March 17, 2007 USA Chauncey Bailey, Oakland Post, August 2, 2007 Venezuela Jorge Aguirre, Cadena Capriles (El Mundo), April 5, 2006 Some of the journalists murdered since 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusion of Gender and Sexual Minorities in Peacebuilding
    Report July 2018 Inclusion of gender and sexual minorities in peacebuilding Background What are the barriers to and benefts of meaningful participation of gender and Methodology sexual minorities in peace processes and Case study participants were identifed how can their participation be supported? through a combination of Conciliation What can their experience tell us more Resources’ staff and partner organisations broadly about inclusion in peace processes? in the two contexts. Semi-structured interviews took place over video call and by Conciliation Resources is an international email with two activists, one a member of a peacebuilding organisation with a strong focus non-governmental organisation. Participants’ on supporting inclusive peace processes. We permission was sought and granted as to have learnt that gender, a key aspect of inclusion, the purpose of the research, how it would be continues to be misunderstood and overlooKed. shared and the identifcation of interviewees. Each interview explored the same core MeaningFul participation of women and other questions, with follow-up discussions where excluded groups in peace processes is important necessary. The research examined how For sustainable peace, yet to date has been the participants bring the voices of gender limited and lacKing in diversity. Women and other and sexual minority people and groups into excluded groups experience multiple forms of peace processes or other political processes; discrimination related to their diverse gender how this work benefts peace processes; identities. These exacerbate social, legal, economic, challenges they have experienced; and cultural, as well as political marginalisation; and the role of international organisations in violent conFlict compounds discrimination.1 supporting this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing a Comprehensive Peace Process for Afghanistan
    [PEACEW RKS [ DESIGNING A COMPREHENSIVE PEACE PROCESS FOR AFGHANISTAN Lisa Schirch, with contributions from Aziz Rafiee,N ilofar Sakhi, and Mirwais Wardak PW75_Cover_3a.indd 1 9/13/11 10:27:11 AM [PEACEW RKS [ ABOUT THE REPO R T This report, sponsored by the Center for Conflict Management at the U.S. Institute of Peace, draws on comparative research literature on peace processes to identify lessons applicable to Afghanistan and makes recommendations to the international community, the Afghan government, and Afghan civil society for ensuring a more comprehensive, successful, and sustainable peace process. Research for this paper was undertaken during five trips to Kabul, Afghanistan, and one trip to Pakistan between 2009 and 2011. Funding for the research in the report came from the Ploughshares Fund and Afghanistan: Pathways to Peace, a project of Peacebuild: The Canadian Peacebuilding Network. ABOUT THE AUTHO R Lisa Schirch is director of 3P Human Security, a partnership for peacebuilding policy. 3P Human Security connects policymakers with global civil society networks, facilitates civil-military dialogue, and provides a peacebuilding lens on current policy issues. She is also a research professor at the Center for Justice and Peacebuilding at Eastern Mennonite University and a policy adviser for the Alliance for Peacebuilding. A former Fulbright Fellow in East and West Africa, Schirch has worked in more than twenty countries in conflict prevention and peacebuilding. Schirch has written four books and numerous articles on conflict prevention and strategic peacebuilding. Photo taken by members of Peace Studies Network of Department of Peace Studies (NCPR) from Psychology and Educational Sciences Faculty of Kabul University in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Conciliation Resources
    conciliation resources Strategic Plan 2009-2011 Preparing the Ground for Peace Contents Global context 3 Key challenges for Conciliation Resources 4 About Conciliation Resources as an organization 5 Our vision 5 Our Mission 5 Our approach 5 The shared understanding that guides our work 6 Making strategic choices for the next three years (2009-2011) 7 The strategic planning process 7 Purpose of this plan 7 Resourcing implications 7 Putting the strategy into practice 8 Performance management implications 8 Structure of the objectives diagram 8 Our Three-year Strategy 9 2 Conciliation Resources Students debating at CRÕs Security Analysis School, Sierra Leone. © Rosalind Hanson-Alp/ Conciliation Resources Global context We live in a world of conflicts, heavily and international governance systems are failing to offer effective responses for prevention and resolution. The armed and unequally violent. Where human and institutional resources as well as the necessary you are born strongly influences your political commitment to prevent, resolve and transform opportunities and vulnerabilities. conflicts are in short supply in stark contrast to government investments in military security. There are at least 60 ongoing conflicts globally with The good news is that the number of armed conflicts is 28 suffering an intensity of violence of 100 or more battle- reportedly in decline, and while civilian deaths continue related deaths. In Iraq there have been an estimated one to be proportionally higher than combatant deaths in most million civilian casualties since 2003. More staggering, contemporary conflicts, total war deaths are lower than there have been an estimated 5.4 million deaths in the ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Legitimacy and Peace Processes from Coercion to Consent ISSUE 25 Accord 25 ISSUE an International Review of Peace Initiatives
    Accord Logo using multiply on 25 layers 2014 Accord ISSUE Logo drawn as Editors seperate elements with overlaps an international review of peace initiatives coloured seperately Alexander Ramsbotham and Achim Wennmann 2014 Legitimacy and peace processes From coercion to consent Legitimacy and peace processes From coercion to consent ISSUE 25 25 Accord ISSUE an international review of peace initiatives Legitimacy and peace processes From coercion to consent April 2014 // Editors Alexander Ramsbotham and Achim Wennmann Accord // ISSUE 25 // www.c-r.org Published by Conciliation Resources, to inform and strengthen peace processes worldwide by documenting and analysing the lessons of peacebuilding Published by Acknowledgements Conciliation Resources Accord’s strength and value relies on the Burghley Yard, 106 Burghley Road expertise, experience and perspectives of the London, NW5 1AL range people who contribute to Accord projects www.c-r.org in a variety of ways. We would like to give special thanks to: Aden Telephone +44 (0)207 359 7728 Abdi, Ali Chahine, Catherine Barnes, Ciaran Fax +44 (0)207 359 4081 O’Toole, Ed Garcia, Elizabeth Picard, Judith Email [email protected] Large, Lisa Schirch, Nerea Bilbatua and Teresa Whitfield. UK charity registration number 1055436 In addition to all our authors, we also extend grateful thanks to the many other expert Editors contributors to this Accord publication: Alexander Ramsbotham and Achim Wennmann Abdulrazag Elaradi, Andrew Tomlinson, Antonia Executive Director Does, Asanga Welikala, Babu Rahman, Catherine
    [Show full text]