Plant Pathology Self Study Oct2011 REV.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plant Pathology Self Study Oct2011 REV.Pdf EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Department of Plant Pathology is one of nine academic units in the College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences (CFAES) at The Ohio State University, and is the sole academic unit dedicated to plant-microbe interactions in Ohio's Higher Education system. The department consists of faculty, students, post-docs, and staff located on the Columbus and Wooster campuses of OSU. Funding comes from the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC) and Ohio State University Extension (OSUE) line items, and from OSU Academic Programs; higher levels of financial support are obtained from external grants, contracts and gifts. Research programs in the department encompass basic investigations of plant-microbe interactions at the molecular level to studies of epidemics at the population level, and, in parallel, mission-oriented investigations of management tactics for diseases of major crops and forest trees. Graduate education is one of the foundations of the department. Currently, there are about 2.5 graduate students per faculty advisor; 217 students have enrolled in our graduate program over the last two decades, and many of our graduates have gone on to leadership roles in academia, government and private industry. The department is fully committed to undergraduate education, with a major in Plant Health Management, a minor in Plant Pathology, a new Plant Pathology major, and courses designed for non-majors. Although our UG enrollment in our major is small, our students are very successful, and 70% ultimately enroll in graduate school. Through the use of oral, printed, and electronic media, we are at the forefront in the college in outreach and engagement efforts, primarily through our Extension education programming. Furthermore, the department is engaged globally, with leadership in international research and development projects. Planning and self- assessment are continually utilized as we develop new initiatives in research, education, and outreach. For example, we have developed a new professional master’s degree in plant health management, and are pioneering eLearning initiatives in the college in classroom and Extension education. Our vision is to be the most credible source of unbiased, science-based information on plant diseases and plant health management in the U.S. Based on success indicators described herein, and our ongoing self-study, we strongly believe that we are one of the leading Departments of Plant Pathology in the country. We have built and maintained this prominent role despite continuing budget cuts from OARDC and OSUE, resulting most notably in the decline in the number of regular faculty members from 19 to 13 since 2000. We see many opportunities to continue our leadership role, and grow further in prominence, by making careful investments in faculty, students, staff, and in infrastructure. But we are now at a critical stage in our future. We are understaffed at the faculty level: to address new initiatives in education and outreach; to address research needs in food security, environmental quality and sustainability, and biobased products; and to take advantage of new interdisciplinary funding opportunities. Therefore, our highest and most immediate priority is to fill two faculty vacancies in basic and mission-oriented programs. We must also repair and upgrade our greenhouses on both campuses and the phytotron (growth-chamber) facility in Columbus. These targeted investments are critical to maintain and grow our leadership role in plant health science and serve our stakeholders at all levels. 1 This page intentionally left blank. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 OVERVIEW OF THE DEPARTMENT .................................................................................................. 9 Background, Mission, and Vision ................................................................................................... 9 Departmental Status and Reputation ............................................................................................. 11 Strategic Planning and Self-Study ................................................................................................ 13 Historical Synopsis ....................................................................................................................... 15 FACULTY IN PLANT PATHOLOGY ................................................................................................. 17 Trends ........................................................................................................................................... 17 Position Priorities, Recruitment, and Hiring ................................................................................. 18 Diversity ........................................................................................................................................ 20 Retention of Faculty ...................................................................................................................... 20 Mentoring and Incorporation of Faculty into the Workings of the Department ........................... 21 RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP ...................................................................................................... 27 Research Foci and Diversity of Faculty Programs ........................................................................ 28 Plant Pathology Research in Relation to the College’s Signature Areas ...................................... 30 Research Impact ............................................................................................................................ 36 Funding for Research .................................................................................................................... 36 A Sampling of Selected Impact Statements .................................................................................. 39 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 48 EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS AND STUDENTS .............................................................................. 49 Undergraduate Programs .............................................................................................................. 50 Undergraduate Major ....................................................................................................... 50 Curriculum for the PHM Major ........................................................................................ 50 Semester Changes ............................................................................................................. 51 Plant Pathology Minor ...................................................................................................... 51 Numbers, Trends, and Impact .......................................................................................... 51 Attrition ............................................................................................................................. 52 Scholarships ...................................................................................................................... 52 Undergraduate Student Organization ............................................................................... 53 Outreach and Recruitment ............................................................................................... 53 Recruitment Challenges ................................................................................................... 54 Recruitment Strategies ...................................................................................................... 55 Interns and Student Assistants ......................................................................................... 56 Undergraduate Credit Hours ............................................................................................ 57 Graduate Program ......................................................................................................................... 58 Overview and Administration .......................................................................................... 58 Degrees and Degree Requirements .................................................................................. 59 3 Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Program (PMBB) ..................................... 60 Trends and Demographics ............................................................................................... 60 Graduate Credit Hours ..................................................................................................... 61 Financial Support for Graduate Students ......................................................................... 61 Graduate Recruitment ...................................................................................................... 63 Plant Pathology Graduate Students Association (PPGSA) .............................................. 63 Quality of the Graduate Program .................................................................................................. 64 NRC Study ....................................................................................................................... 64 Ohio State’s Doctoral Assessment – 2007 ....................................................................... 66 Some Statistics
Recommended publications
  • Protection Against Fungi in the Marketing of Grains and Byproducts
    Protection against fungi in the marketing of grains and byproducts Ing. Agr. Juan M. Hernandez Vieyra ARGENT EXPORT S.A. May 2nd 2011 OBJECTIVE: To supply tools to eliminate fungus and bacteria contamination in maize and soybeans: Particularly: Stenocarpella maydis Cercospora sojina 2 • Powerfull Disinfectant of great efficacy in fungus, bacteria and virus • Produced by ICA Laboratories, South Africa. • aka SPOREKILL, VIRUKILL • Registered in more than 20 countries: USA, Australia, New Zeland, Brazil, Philipines, Israel • Product scientifically and field proven, with more than 15 years in the international market. • Registered at SENASA • Certifications: ISO 9001, GMP. 3 Properties of Sportek: – Based on a novel and patented quaternary amonio compound sintesis : didecil dimetil amonium chloride. – Excellent biodegradability thus, low environmental impact. – Really non corrosive and non oxidative. – Non toxic at recommended dosis . – Minimum inhibition concentration has a very low toxicity, LD 50>4000mg/Kg., lower than table salt. – High content of surfactants with excellent wetting capacity and penetration. – High efficacy in presence of organic matter, also with hard waters and heavy soils. – Non dependent of pH and is effective under a wide range of temperatures. 4 What is Sportek used for: To disinfect a wide spectrum of surfaces and feeds against: • Virus, • Bacteria, • Mycoplasma, • yeast, • Algae, • Fungus. 5 Where Sportek has been proven: VIRUKILL ES EFECTIVO CONTRA LOS VIRUS DE AVICULTURA, BACTERIAS HONGOS Y GRUPOS DE FAMILIA DE MICOPLASMA Hongos, levadura y EJEMPLOS DE VIRUS EJEMPLOS DE BACTERIAS ejemplos de Grupos de familia Ejemplos de Acinetobacter Ornithobacterium micoplasma patógenos anitratus rhinotracheale Birnaviridae Gumboro (IBD) Bacillus subtilis Pasteurella spores multocida Caliciviridae Feline calicivirus Bacilillus subtilis Pasteurella Aspergillus Níger vegetative volantium Coronaviridae Infectious bronchitis Bordatella spp.
    [Show full text]
  • “Estudio De La Sensibilidad a Fungicidas De Aislados De Cercospora Sojina Hara, Agente Causal De La Mancha Ojo De Rana En El Cultivo De Soja”
    “Estudio de la sensibilidad a fungicidas de aislados de Cercospora sojina Hara, agente causal de la mancha ojo de rana en el cultivo de soja” Tesis presentada para optar al título de Magister de la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Área Producción Vegetal, orientación en Protección Vegetal María Belén Bravo Ingeniera Agrónoma, Universidad Nacional de San Luis – 2011 Especialista en Protección Vegetal, Universidad Católica de Córdoba - 2015 INTA Estación Experimental Agropecuaria, San Luis Fecha de defensa: 5 de abril de 2019 Escuela para Graduados Ing. Agr. Alberto Soriano Facultad de Agronomía – Universidad de Buenos Aires COMITÉ CONSEJERO Director de tesis Marcelo Aníbal Carmona Ingeniero Agrónomo (Universidad de Buenos Aires) Magister Scientiae en Producción Vegetal (Universidad de Buenos Aires) Doctor en Ciencias Agropecuarias (Universidad Nacional de La Plata) Co-director Alicia Luque Bioquímica (Universidad Nacional de Rosario) Profesora de Enseñanza Superior (Universidad de Concepción del Uruguay) Doctora (Universidad Nacional de Rosario) Consejero de Estudios Diego Martínez Alvarez Ingeniero Agrónomo (Universidad Nacional de San Luis) Magister en Ciencias Agropecuarias. Mención en Producción Vegetal (Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto) JURADO EVALUADOR Dr. Leonardo Daniel Ploper Dra. Cecilia Inés Mónaco Ing. Agr. MSci. Olga Susana Correa iii DEDICATORIA A mi compañero de caminos Juan Pablo Odetti A Leti, mi amiga guerrera… iv AGRADECIMIENTOS Al sistema de becas de INTA y la EEA INTA San Luis por permitirme capacitarme y realizar mis estudios de posgrado. A los proyectos PRET SUR, PRET NO y sus coordinadores Hugo Bernasconi y Jorge Mercau por la ayuda recibida en todo momento. Al director de tesis Marcelo Carmona, co directora Alicia Luque y consejero de estudios Diego Martínez Alvarez, por las enseñanzas recibidas.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2020 Missouri Roster
    The Missouri Roster 2019–2020 Secretary of State John R. Ashcroft State Capitol Room 208 Jefferson City, MO 65101 www.sos.mo.gov John R. Ashcroft Secretary of State Cover image: A sunrise appears on the horizon over the Missouri River in Jefferson City. Photo courtesy of Tyler Beck Photography www.tylerbeck.photography The Missouri Roster 2019–2020 A directory of state, district, county and federal officials John R. Ashcroft Secretary of State Office of the Secretary of State State of Missouri Jefferson City 65101 STATE CAPITOL John R. Ashcroft ROOM 208 SECRETARY OF STATE (573) 751-2379 Dear Fellow Missourians, As your secretary of state, it is my honor to provide this year’s Mis- souri Roster as a way for you to access Missouri’s elected officials at the county, state and federal levels. This publication provides contact information for officials through- out the state and includes information about personnel within exec- utive branch departments, the General Assembly and the judiciary. Additionally, you will find the most recent municipal classifications and results of the 2018 general election. The strength of our great state depends on open communication and honest, civil debate; we have been given an incredible oppor- tunity to model this for the next generation. I encourage you to par- ticipate in your government, contact your elected representatives and make your voice heard. Sincerely, John R. Ashcroft Secretary of State www.sos.mo.gov The content of the Missouri Roster is public information, and may be used accordingly; however, the arrangement, graphics and maps are copyrighted material.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Molecular and Environmental Plant Sciences Texas A&M University
    MEPS academic program review 2014 Molecular and Environmental Plant Sciences Texas A&M University External Review Molecular and Environmental Plant Sciences Graduate Program Self Study March 2014 Molecular and Environmental Plant Sciences 1 MEPS academic program review 2014 Molecular and Environmental Plant Sciences Texas A&M University Molecular and Environmental Plant Sciences Graduate Program Self Study March 2014 College of Agriculture and Life Sciences College of Geosciences College of Science Molecular and Environmental Plant Sciences 2 MEPS academic program review 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1. INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 Welcome 1.2 Charge to the Review Team 2. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM 10 2.1 Texas A&M University 2.2 The College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (COALS) 2.3 Aggie Traditions 2.4 Graduate Interdisciplinary Programs 3. MEPS PROGRAM STRUCTURE 18 3.1 Program History 3.2 Program Description 3.3 University Administration of MEPS Program 3.4 Administrative Structure of the MEPS Program 3.4.1 Executive Committee and Chair 3.4.2 Program Coordinator 3.4.3 Admissions Committee 3.4.4 Symposium Committee 3.4.5 Nomination and Awards Committee 3.5 Budget Allocations and Program Expenditures 3.5.1 Funding for current graduate students 4. THE MEPS GRADUATE PROGRAM 31 4.1 Admission Requirements and Procedures 4.2 The Curriculum 4.2.1 Master of Molecular and Environmental Plant Sciences 4.2.2 Doctoral Degree 4.2.3 Degree Plan 4.2.4 Advisory Committee 4.2.5 Designated MEPS Courses 4.2.6 MEPS funded Assistantships 4.2.7 MEPS Graduate Student Engagement 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawmakers Face Limited Options to Attack Obama Regulations
    Jan. 11, 2017 Volume 13, Number 2 Lawmakers face limited options to attack Obama regulations President-elect Donald Trump has made clear he plans to make good on his campaign promises to undo major parts of President Obama’s regulatory agenda. But that could be heavy lifting for the executive branch, requiring a time-consuming notice-and-comment process that could take many months or years to complete. So, many in the agriculture and energy sectors are looking to Congress to take steps that could block enforcement of several rules, or even kill them. The surest, and quickest, way to repeal a rule is through the use of the Congressional Review Act, a 21- year-old law that gives Congress a defined time period to vote down new regulations. The CRA has been used successfully just once, in 2000, to kill OSHA ergonomics standards imposed by the Clinton administration. President Obama has vetoed five CRA resolutions, including measures aimed at killing the “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) rule and the EPA’s greenhouse gas limits on electric utilities. This year, there will be a GOP president in the White House who would sign a CRA resolution. Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif. But major hurdles remain. A rule isn’t eligible for CRA review unless it was issued in the final 60 legislative days of the last Congress, which means any regulations finalized before the middle of last June won’t be affected. And while the CRA resolutions can’t be filibustered in the Senate – they only require a majority vote to be approved – getting a majority of the Senate to kill a regulation that is, say, seen as important to public health won’t be easy either.
    [Show full text]
  • Mormonism in Illinois 1839-1847: a Study of the Development of Socio-Religious ConIct
    Durham E-Theses Mormonism in Illinois 1839-1847: a study of the development of socio-religious conict Hampshire, Annette Pauline How to cite: Hampshire, Annette Pauline (1979) Mormonism in Illinois 1839-1847: a study of the development of socio-religious conict, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8109/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 ABSTRACT This thesis is a sociological account of the development of conflict between a religious group, the Mormons, and the society which acted as their host, mid nineteenth century Illinois. It traces the deterioration of the relationship between the Mormons and their host from one of friendly sympathy to one of open warfare, and seeks to explain this decline with the aid of sociological concepts. It does not attempt to put forward a theory of conflict, nor to give a history of Mormonism in Illinois.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Pathology in Ohio, Chapters 7-13
    Chapter 7 Advancing Ohio State Plant Pathology to National Prominence (1984–2005) Just as the attainment of a separate Department of At this same time, new leadership came to the Plant Pathology in 1967 finally came only as part of Department of Plant Pathology. Ira Deep stepped a series of administrative decisions made at college down as the department’s first chairperson in 1984. and university levels, so the further development of After a nationwide search, Charles Curtis, chairperson the department took place in a climate of continual of Plant Science at the University of Delaware, was change at The Ohio State University. During the first attracted to lead the department. He arrived at the dozen years of its existence, the department received height of the whirlwind created by Max Lennon and good financial support from Dean Roy Kottman, who threw himself into leading the department in these new at that time, “wore three hats” as Dean of the college directions. He strongly stressed that the faculty had to and Director of both the OARDC and the Extension engage more fully in biotechnology and the molecular service. He had championed the department from its revolution that was taking place in the biological beginning and facilitated its considerable growth in the sciences. In a time of declining allocated resources, early years under Ira Deep’s leadership. However, the he pushed the faculty to place increased emphasis on financial position of the state began to decline by the writing grant proposals to obtain outside support for late 1970s and things changed considerably by the early their research.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterising Plant Pathogen Communities and Their Environmental Drivers at a National Scale
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Characterising plant pathogen communities and their environmental drivers at a national scale A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University by Andreas Makiola Lincoln University, New Zealand 2019 General abstract Plant pathogens play a critical role for global food security, conservation of natural ecosystems and future resilience and sustainability of ecosystem services in general. Thus, it is crucial to understand the large-scale processes that shape plant pathogen communities. The recent drop in DNA sequencing costs offers, for the first time, the opportunity to study multiple plant pathogens simultaneously in their naturally occurring environment effectively at large scale. In this thesis, my aims were (1) to employ next-generation sequencing (NGS) based metabarcoding for the detection and identification of plant pathogens at the ecosystem scale in New Zealand, (2) to characterise plant pathogen communities, and (3) to determine the environmental drivers of these communities. First, I investigated the suitability of NGS for the detection, identification and quantification of plant pathogens using rust fungi as a model system.
    [Show full text]
  • Cassava Anthracnose Disease, Cassava Bud Necrosis, and Root Rots
    PBY 409 – PLANT PATHOLOGY I AND II OUTLINE •Introduction •Methods of isolation of pathogens in pure state and their classification . •Viruses, bacteria, nematodes and Fungi as agents of plant diseases. •The structure, reproduction/life cycles and classification of plant pathogenic fungi, bacteria and viruses. •Infection and host parasite relationships. •Koch ’s postulate •Diseases of some economic plants (particularly food crops) in Nigeria. •Symptoms, etiology, cultural characteristics and control measures THE STRUCTURE REPRODUCTION/LIFE CYCLES AND CLASSIFICATION OF PLANT PATHOGENIC FUNGI. Introduction Fungi are of great economic importance to man and plays an important role in the disintegration of organic matter. They affect us directly by destroying our food, fabric, leather, and other commercial goods. They are responsible for a large number of diseases of man, animals and plants. Fungal cell structures Fungal cells may be minute and a single, uninucleate cell may constitute an entire organism e. g a single cell of Olpidium or yeast cell. On the other hand, fungal cells may be elongated and strand like and several may be joined to form a thread of cells (hypha). A large number of hyphae form a mycelium. Their cell wall is generally made up of chitin and cellulose. One cell hyphae may be separated from another by a cross wall or septum. Septa in different groups of fungi have impt diff in structure ie. The septa in the lower fungi are pseudosepta (septa perforated by so many pores that they are sieve like). In the Ascomycota, and some Fungi Imperfecti, the septum is perforated by a single pore. In the Basidiomycota and some members of the Fungi Imperfecti, the septum is more complex than found in the Ascomycota.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-2022 Missouri Roster
    The Missouri Roster 2021–2022 Secretary of State John R. Ashcroft State Capitol Room 208 Jefferson City, MO 65101 www.sos.mo.gov John R. Ashcroft Secretary of State THE MISSOURI ROSTER 2021–2022 A directory of state, district, county and federal officials JOHN R. ASHCROFT SECRETARY OF STATE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE STATE OF MISSOURI JEFFERSON CITY 65101 STATE CAPITOL JOHN R. ASHCROFT ROOM 208 SECRETARY OF STATE (573) 751-2379 Dear Fellow Missourians, As your secretary of state, it is my honor to provide this year’s Missouri Roster as a way for you to access Missouri’s elected officials at the county, state and federal levels. This publication provides contact information for officials throughout the state and includes information about personnel within executive branch departments, the General Assembly and the judiciary. Additionally, you will find the most recent municipal classifications and results of the 2020 general election. The strength of our great state depends on open communication and honest, civil debate; we have been given an incredible opportunity to model this for the next generation. I encourage you to participate in your government, contact your elected representatives and make your voice heard. Sincerely, John R. Ashcroft Secretary of State www.sos.mo.gov The content of the Missouri Roster is public information, and may be used accordingly; however, the arrangement, graphics and maps are copyrighted material. The graphics and maps may be used for noncommercial purposes provided credit is given as follows: “The graphics and/or maps from the Missouri Roster are used by permission of the Missouri Secretary of State, the copyright holder.” All other uses of the arrangement, graphics, and maps must have specific written permission from the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pest Management for Tropical Crops: Soyabeans
    CAB Reviews 2018 13, No. 055 Integrated pest management for tropical crops: soyabeans E.A. Heinrichs1* and Rangaswamy Muniappan2 Address: 1 IPM Innovation Lab, 6517 S. 19th St., Lincoln, NE, USA. 2 IPM Innovation Lab, CIRED, Virginia Tech, 526 Prices Fork Road, Blacksburg, VA, USA. *Correspondence: E.A. Heinrichs. Email: [email protected] Received: 29 January 2018 Accepted: 16 October 2018 doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR201813055 The electronic version of this article is the definitive one. It is located here: http://www.cabi.org/cabreviews © CAB International 2018 (Online ISSN 1749-8848) Abstract Soyabean, because of its importance in food security and wide diversity of uses in industrial applications, is one of the world’s most important crops. There are a number of abiotic and biotic constraints that that threaten soyabean production. Soyabean pests are major biotic constraints limiting soyabean production and quality. Crop losses to animal pests, diseases and weeds in soyabeans average 26–29% globally. This review discusses biology, global distribution and plant damage and yield losses in soyabean caused by insect pests, plant diseases, nematodes and weeds. The interactions among insects, weeds and diseases are detailed. A soyabean integrated pest management (IPM) package of practices, covering the crop from pre-sowing to harvest, is outlined. The effect of climate changes on arthropod pests, plant diseases and weeds are discussed. The history and evolution of the highly successful soyabean IPM programme in Brazil and the factors that led to its demise are explained. Keywords: Biological control, Biotic constraints, Chemical control, Climate change, Cultural control, Insect pests, Mechanical practices, Nematodes, Pesticides, Package of practices, Plant diseases, Plant pest interactions, Soybean IPM programme, Weeds Review Methodology: Search terms used were: scientific and common names of all of the insects, plant diseases, nematodes and weeds listed in the tables.
    [Show full text]
  • Angular Leaf Spot
    Management of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) angular leaf spot (Pseudocercospora griseola) using cultural practices and development of disease-weather models for prediction of the disease and host characteristics by David Icishahayo A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Crop Science Faculty of Agriculture University of Zimbabwe September 2014 ABSTRACT Bean seed collected from 82 households growing beans in Chinyika Resettlement Area indicated that sugar (sweet) bean type was the most preferred and cultivated by 84.1 % of farmers. The most common seed source was home-saved seed as indicated by 73.2 % of the farmers. Common seedborne fungi isolated from the different seed lots using the blotter method included; Fusarium oxysporum (73.2 %), Alternaria alternata (70.7 %) and Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (51.2 %). The major sources of inoculum identified for Pseudocercospora griseola were; infected seed, concomitant infected plants in the field, the soil at the end of the growing period, the air, rainfall and irrigation water. The north and south facing slides on the local trap were the most efficient in conidia trapping and the north conformed to the main wind direction which was north-north-east. A field study conducted on the control of common bean angular leaf spot (Pseudocercospora griseola) during two years (2002/3 and 2003/4) indicated that, as a consequence of unfavourable weather conditions for disease development, winter and early planting in summer associated with any irrigation method can be adopted. To target high yield, early planting can be complemented with any irrigation method, whereas the winter crop worked best with sprinkler irrigation.
    [Show full text]