DOCSLIB.ORG

11Th Research Symposium at Mammoth Cave National Park Shannon R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
11Th Research Symposium at Mammoth Cave National Park Shannon R Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Mammoth Cave Research Symposia 11th Research Symposium 2016 Apr 18th, 8:00 AM - Apr 20th, 7:00 PM Proceedings for Celebrating the Diversity of Research in the Mammoth Cave Region: 11th Research Symposium at Mammoth Cave National Park Shannon R. Trimboli Editor Western Kentucky University, MCICSL, [email protected] Luke E. Dodd, Editor De'Etra Young, Editor Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/mc_reserch_symp Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Forest Sciences Commons, Geology Commons, Hydrology Commons, Other Earth Sciences Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Shannon R. Trimboli Editor; Luke E. Dodd, Editor; and De'Etra Young, Editor, "Proceedings for Celebrating the Diversity of Research in the Mammoth Cave Region: 11th Research Symposium at Mammoth Cave National Park" (April 18, 2016). Mammoth Cave Research Symposia. Paper 1. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/mc_reserch_symp/11th_Research_Symposium_2016/Complete_Proceedings/1 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mammoth Cave Research Symposia by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Celebrating the Diversity of Research in the Mammoth Cave Region 11th Research Symposium at Mammoth Cave National Park Proceedings April 18-20, 2016 Mammoth Cave National Park Training Center Acknowledgements Putting together a research symposium and the corresponding proceedings are more than any one person can do alone. Many people have helped make this year’s symposium and the proceedings you are holding a success. I am extremely grateful to everyone who has helped in any way, even if it was something as seemingly simple as an encouraging smile, a well-timed joke, or being an extra brain when mine was too frazzled to think straight. Unfortunately, I don’t have space on this page to personally thank everyone, but that doesn’t mean I don’t recognize and appreciate what each of you have done. I want to specifically thank my co-editors, Luke Dodd (Eastern Kentucky University) and De’Etra Young (Tennessee State University) for jumping in at the last minute and helping me edit each of the papers and abstracts in these proceedings. I also thank Laura Shultz for helping with laying out the proceedings and Gina Zanarini for helping to organize the paperwork. In addition, I want to thank David Kime and his students in Northern Kentucky University’s Honors Program for all their help during the symposium. I also thank the Cave City Convention Center for hosting us during Monday night’s showing of Mammoth Cave: A Place Called Home. Likewise, I thank the Cave Research Foundation for hosting us on Tuesday evening and providing a wonderful showcase of recent mapping activities at Mammoth Cave National Park. I also can’t forget to thank Helen Siewers and the Friends of Mammoth Cave for the many ways they helped out behind the scenes. Last, but certainly not least, I thank each of our presenters. None of this would be possible without each of you, the valuable research that you conduct, and your willingness to share your work at events such as this. Thanks everyone! Sincerely, Shannon Trimboli Education Coordinator, Mammoth Cave International Center for Science and Learning Celebrating the Diversity of Research in the Mammoth Cave Region: 11th Research Symposium at Mammoth Cave National Park Archeology / History Civilian and Soldier Graffiti of Hundred Dome (Coach) Cave, Kentucky, 1859 -1862 .......... 1 ~ Marion O. Smith and Joseph C. Douglas Archeological Excavations in Advance of the Historic Tour Trail Rehabilitation ................. 9 ~ Steven Ahler and Rebecca L. Hummel Documentation and Conservation of the 1812-Era Saltpeter Works in Mammoth Cave, Kentucky .............................................................................................................................. 16 ~ George M. Crothers and Christina A. Pappas New Discovery Cultural Artifact Inventory and Analysis Project Update ...........................17 ~ David Kime, Jillian Goins, Robert Jensen, Clayton Johnson, Alessa Rulli, and Victoria Voss Recent Investigations at 15Ed23: Historic and Cultural Resources in a Disturbed Cave Environment ......................................................................................................................... 18 ~ Joseph C. Douglas, Alan Cressler, George Crothers, Marion O. Smith, Kristen Bobo, and Justin Carlson Evaluation of an Early Nineteenth Century Brick Kiln at the Gardner House in Hart County, Kentucky ................................................................................................................ 27 ~ Lauren Kenney and Darlene Applegate Ethnographic Overview and Assessment of Mammoth Cave National Park: A Progress Report ................................................................................................................................... 28 ~ Michael Ann Williams, Kristen Clark, Eleanor Hasken, and Rachel Haberman 1852 Journey to Mammoth Cave StoryMap ......................................................................... 29 ~ Katie Algeo Mammoth Cave: A Place Called Home .............................................................................. 30 ~ Cheryl Beckley Where Did They Go? An Analysis of Out-Migration from Mammoth Cave National Park During Creation ....................................................................................................................31 ~ Collins Eke Flint Ridge Cave History and Legends ................................................................................ 32 ~ Norman L. Warnell and Stanley D. Sides Research and Resources in WKU Special Collections ........................................................ 38 ~ Nancy Richey Biology / Ecology The Freshwater Mussels and the Green River: Conservation, Protection, and Management of a Vital Resource in North America ................................................................................ 39 ~ Monte McGregor In Situ Survival and Performance of Juvenile Mussels in Streams and Correlations with Water and Sediment Quality Factors ................................................................................... 44 ~ Wendell Haag, Jacob Culp, Monte McGregor, James Stoeckel, and Robert Bringolf Potential Evidence for Arsenic Mineralization in Mussel Shells in the Upper Green River Basin, Kentucky ................................................................................................................... 45 ~ Autumn Turner, Chris Groves, Aaron Celestian, and Albert Meier Surveys for the Diamond Darter (Crystallaria cincotta), an Endangered Species Known Historically from the Green River in Kentucky ................................................................... 50 ~ Matthew R. Thomas and Stephanie L. Brandt Host-Parasite Associations of Small Mammal Communities: Implications for the Spread of Lyme Disease ....................................................................................................................... 59 ~ Matthew Buchholz and Carl Dick Bird Research at Mammoth Cave National Park: A Synopsis ............................................. 60 ~ Brice Leech The Effects of Rainfall on Vernal Herbs .............................................................................. 64 ~ Janis LeMaster and Albert Meier Oak Regeneration in Mammoth Cave National Park ........................................................... 65 ~ Bill Moore and Carl Nordman Conducting a Biological Inventory of Sloan’s Crossing Pond .............................................. 66 ~ Miranda Thompson, Jason A. Matthews, and Christy Soldo Amphibians and Reptiles of Mammoth Cave National Park: What Have We Learned After 13 Years of Monitoring ........................................................................................................ 67 ~ John MacGregor Over Half a Century of Mammoth Cave National Park Mid-winter Bird Count Data ........ 68 ~ Blaine Ferrell Video Presentation: Monitoring Cave Organisms, Cumberland Piedmont Inventory and Monitoring Network ............................................................................................................ 69 ~ Kurt Helf, Steven Thomas, and Michael Durham The Activity of Myotis sodalis and Myotis septentrionalis Changes on the Landscape of Mammoth Cave National Park Following the Arrival of White-nose Syndrome ................ 70 ~ Rachael Griffitts, Luke E. Dodd, and Michael J. Lacki Recent Winter Bat Numbers at Mammoth Cave National Park: Pre/Post White-Nose Syndrome Arrival ................................................................................................................ 76 ~ Steven Thomas Summary of 2015 Winter Bat Monitoring at Mammoth Cave National Park ...................... 77 ~ Laura Shultz, Chris Clark, Rick Toomey, and Shannon Trimboli Evaluating the Energetic Value of Lepidoptera Using Bomb Calorimetry .......................... 85 ~ Shelby A. Fulton, Luke E. Dodd, and Lynne K. Rieske Organization and Development of the Eyes of Ptomaphagus hirtus, the troglobitic small carrion beetle of Mammoth Cave ......................................................................................... 91 ~ Markus Friedrich, Jasmina Kulacic, and Elke Buschbeck Strip Adaptive Cluster Sampling with Application to Cave Crickets .................................. 92 ~ Kurt Lewis Helf, Tom Philippi, Bill Moore, and Lillian Scoggins The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Frequency of Missing Legs in the Cave Cricket, Hadenoecus Subterraneus
    Plattsburgh State University of New York Volume 6 (2013) Frequency of missing legs in the cave cricket, Hadenoecus subterraneus Mohammed Chandooa, Elizabeth Lavoiea, Utsav Pandeya, and Suganthi Thirunavukarasua Faculty Mentors: Kathleen H. Lavoiea, Thomas Wolosza, and Kurt Helfb. aSUNY College at Plattsburgh, Plattsburgh, NY 12901 ([email protected]) cCumberland-Piedmont Network, National Park Service, Mammoth Cave, KY 42259 ([email protected]) ABSTRACT The cave cricket (Hadenoecus subterraneus) is a keystone species in maintaining biological diversity in cave communities in Mammoth Cave National Park. Crickets must leave the cave to forage on nights when conditions are favorable, which puts them at considerable risk of predation. Invertebrates have developed defenses for predation, including autotomy (voluntary loss of a limb). We hypothesize that missing legs are a sign of predation pressure on the crickets, and may be vary in different environments. We used a visual census to record the sex-specific frequency of missing legs among adult cave crickets at eight different cave entrances. We expected males to be missing legs more than females because they must leave the cave refuge to forage more frequently than females; however, we found that males and females were missing legs in equal numbers. The hind leg was missing with greater frequency than other limbs, likely the result of cricket predator avoidance behavior (jumping), which puts the larger hind limb closest to the predator. The frequency of crickets with missing limbs varied among cave entrances from a low of 6.6% to a high of nearly 40%, with abundance varying yearly. In Frozen Niagara, which consistently had a high proportion of crickets missing legs, the percentage missing legs was highest in crickets roosting closer to the entrance (30.8%) than deeper (18.7%) into the cave.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Possible Foraging Differences in Urban and Rural Cave Cricket Populations: Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Ratios (Δ13c, Δ15n) As Indicators of Trophic Level
    Examining possible foraging differences in urban and rural cave cricket populations: Carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios (δ13C, δ15N) as indicators of trophic level Steven J. Taylor1, Jean K. Krejca2, and Keith C. Hackley3 1Division of Biodiversity and Ecological Entomology, Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 South Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 ( [email protected] phone: 217-649-0240 ) 2Zara Environmental, LLC, Buda, TX 78610 ( [email protected] phone: 512-295-5333 ) 3Isotope Geochemistry Laboratory, Illinois State Geological Survey, 615 E Peabody Dr., Champaign, IL 61820 ( [email protected] phone: 217-244-2396 ) 30 November 2007 Illinois Natural History Survey Technical Report 2007 (59) prepared for: Attn: Dr. C. Craig Farquhar Section 6 Grant Program Coordinator, Wildlife Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744 USA Cover: Cicurina varians (Araneae) in web in Surprise Sink, Bexar County, Texas. Note Pseudosinella violenta (Collembola) in lower left and fresh fecal pellets of Ceuthophilus sp. to left of center. Photo by Jean K. Krejca. Abstract The energy regime in small Texas caves differs significantly from many caves of the better studied eastern United States in that surface-foraging cave crickets (Ceuthophilus secretus and Ceuthophilus “species B”) are major contributors to these systems. The federally listed endangered cave invertebrates of Travis, Williamson, and Bexar counties, Texas, are dependent on these crickets to transport energy from the surface to the cave environment. Using stable isotope analysis in combination with in- cave counts of animal life we examined foraging differences between S. invicata and cave cricket populations in nine caves chosen based on their low, medium, and high levels of human impact.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Entitled Molecular, Morphological, and Biogeographic Resolution of Cryptic Taxa in the Greenside Darter Etheostoma Blen
    A Thesis Entitled Molecular, morphological, and biogeographic resolution of cryptic taxa in the Greenside Darter Etheostoma blennioides complex By Amanda E. Haponski Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Master of Science Degree in Biology (Ecology-track) ____________________________ Advisor: Dr. Carol A. Stepien ____________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Timothy G. Fisher ____________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Johan F. Gottgens ____________________________ College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo December 2007 Copyright © 2007 This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of Molecular, morphological, and biogeographic resolution of cryptic taxa in the Greenside Darter Etheostoma blennioides complex Amanda E. Haponski Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Master of Science Degree in Biology (Ecology-track) The University of Toledo December 2007 DNA sequencing has led to the resolution of many cryptic taxa, which are especially prevalent in the North American darter fishes (Family Percidae). The Greenside Darter Etheostoma blennioides commonly occurs in the lower Great Lakes region, where two putative subspecies, the eastern “Allegheny” type E. b. blennioides and the western “Prairie” type E. b. pholidotum , overlap. The objective of this study was to test the systematic identity and genetic divergence distinguishing the two subspecies in areas of sympatry and allopatry in comparison to other subspecies and close relatives. DNA sequences from the mtDNA cytochrome b gene and control region and the nuclear S7 intron 1 comprising a total of 1,497 bp were compared from 294 individuals across 18 locations, including the Lake Erie basin and the Allegheny, Meramec, Obey, Ohio, Rockcastle, Susquehanna, and Wabash River systems.
    [Show full text]
  • AN ANALYSIS of SEXUAL DIMORPHISM in LENGTH and WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS of IOWA DARTERS Margaret a Harings Northland College, CB: 853 1411 Ellis Ave Ashland, WI 54806
    AN ANALYSIS OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN LENGTH AND WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS OF IOWA DARTERS Margaret A Harings Northland College, CB: 853 1411 Ellis Ave Ashland, WI 54806 ABSTRACT Iowa darters, Etheostoma exile, are commonly found throughout the Lake Superior watershed. However, given their abundance and non-game status, little is known about basic life history characteristics of these fish. Iowa darters were seined from Inch Lake (Bayfield County, WI) in May of 2010 and 2011 to assess sexual dimorphism in sizes. Collected fish were immediately frozen and later thawed and measured for total length (TL) and total weight (TW), and dissected to remove the gonads which were also weighed. Somatic weight (SW) was calculated for each fish. The mean TL of males and females did not differ. There was a weak difference in the relationships between log(TW) and log(TL) between male and female Iowa darters. There was a strong difference in the relationships between the log(GW) and log(TL) for males and females. However, a significant difference did not exist between log(somatic weight) and log(TL) between males and females. The weak difference in the TL-TW relationship between males and females appear to be due to the strong difference in the TL-GW relationship between the sexes. Additional research is planned to determine whether differences between males and females occur in age structure and diet. INTRODUCTION Iowa darters are small fish that are typically found in clear to slightly turbid, light brown water of small lakes, bogs, and small streams (Becker 1983). The range of Iowa darters extends east to New York, west to Montana, north to southern Canada, and south to portions of Illinois (Scott and Crossman 1973; Lee and Gilbert 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Observation and Habitat Utilization of Three Rare Darters
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2010 Underwater observation and habitat utilization of three rare darters (Etheostoma cinereum, Percina burtoni, and Percina williamsi) in the Little River, Blount County, Tennessee Robert Trenton Jett University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Jett, Robert Trenton, "Underwater observation and habitat utilization of three rare darters (Etheostoma cinereum, Percina burtoni, and Percina williamsi) in the Little River, Blount County, Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2010. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/636 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Robert Trenton Jett entitled "Underwater observation and habitat utilization of three rare darters (Etheostoma cinereum, Percina burtoni, and Percina williamsi) in the Little River, Blount County, Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Wildlife and Fisheries Science. James L. Wilson, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: David A. Etnier, Jason G.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Red Flag Summary Environmental Red Flag Summary Us 68X and Us 231X Planning Study Kytc Item No
    APPENDIX E – ENVIRONMENTAL RED FLAG SUMMARY ENVIRONMENTAL RED FLAG SUMMARY US 68X AND US 231X PLANNING STUDY KYTC ITEM NO. N/A Warren County US 68X from south of Robinson Avenue (MP 1.000) to north of Avenue of Champions (MP 1.626) US 231X from north of Normal Street (MP 2.300) to south of Holly Drive (MP 2.600) Prepared for: Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Central Office Division of Environmental Analysis Highway District 3 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. November 1, 2017 ENVIRONMENTAL RED FLAG SUMMARY US 68X AND US 231X PLANNING STUDY KYTC ITEM NO. N/A Executive Summary This Environmental Red Flag Summary has been prepared for the US 68X and US 231X Planning Study in Bowling Green, Warren County, Kentucky (KYTC Item No. not assigned). The purpose of the Planning Study is to evaluate operational and safety improvements at the Russellville Road intersections with Morgantown Road and University Boulevard and options to widen the underpass on Russellville Road. The purpose of this Environmental Red Flag Summary is to identify environmental resources of significance, potential jurisdictional features, and other environmental areas of concern that should be considered during project development. Natural and human environment resources within the study area were identified from secondary sources, as well as a pedestrian survey conducted on August 30, 2017. Based on this information, the key environmental features within the study area include: Surface Streams: None present in the study area or immediate vicinity. Wetlands: None present in the study area or immediate vicinity. Threatened and Endangered Species: Seventeen (17) federal-listed species (14 endangered, 3 threatened) have the potential to occur in the study area, with 10 federal-listed species recorded within 5-miles of the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hoosier- Shawnee Ecological Assessment Area
    United States Department of Agriculture The Hoosier- Forest Service Shawnee Ecological North Central Assessment Research Station General Frank R. Thompson, III, Editor Technical Report NC-244 Thompson, Frank R., III, ed 2004. The Hoosier-Shawnee Ecological Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-244. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. 267 p. This report is a scientific assessment of the characteristic composition, structure, and processes of ecosystems in the southern one-third of Illinois and Indiana and a small part of western Kentucky. It includes chapters on ecological sections and soils, water resources, forest, plants and communities, aquatic animals, terrestrial animals, forest diseases and pests, and exotic animals. The information presented provides a context for land and resource management planning on the Hoosier and Shawnee National Forests. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Key Words: crayfish, current conditions, communities, exotics, fish, forests, Hoosier National Forest, mussels, plants, Shawnee National Forest, soils, water resources, wildlife. Cover photograph: Camel Rock in Garden of the Gods Recreation Area, with Shawnee Hills and Garden of the Gods Wilderness in the back- ground, Shawnee National Forest, Illinois. Contents Preface....................................................................................................................... II North Central Research Station USDA Forest Service Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Karst Preserve Design Recommendations March 1, 2012
    Karst Preserve Design Recommendations U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin Ecological Services Field Office 10711 Burnet Rd. Suite #200 Austin, TX 78758 July 28, 2011 Revised March 1, 2012 Karst Preserve Design Recommendations March 1, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1 2.0 KARST PRESERVE DESIGN ...............................................................................................1 2.1 Karst Preserve Quality Definitions ........................................................................................3 2.2 Karst Preserve Design Checklist ............................................................................................4 2.3 Karst Preserve Design Recommendations .............................................................................4 2.3.1 Karst Preserve Size........................................................................................................5 2.3.2 Karst Preserve Shape and Configuration.......................................................................5 2.3.3 Cave Size and Climate Change......................................................................................5 2.3.4 Biotic Components of the Karst Ecosystem..................................................................5 2.3.5 Abiotic Components of the Karst Ecosystem…............................................................6 2.3.6 Other Considerations.....................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Kyfishid[1].Pdf
    Kentucky Fishes Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources Kentucky Fish & Wildlife’s Mission To conserve, protect and enhance Kentucky’s fish and wildlife resources and provide outstanding opportunities for hunting, fishing, trapping, boating, shooting sports, wildlife viewing, and related activities. Federal Aid Project funded by your purchase of fishing equipment and motor boat fuels Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources #1 Sportsman’s Lane, Frankfort, KY 40601 1-800-858-1549 • fw.ky.gov Kentucky Fish & Wildlife’s Mission Kentucky Fishes by Matthew R. Thomas Fisheries Program Coordinator 2011 (Third edition, 2021) Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources Division of Fisheries Cover paintings by Rick Hill • Publication design by Adrienne Yancy Preface entucky is home to a total of 245 native fish species with an additional 24 that have been introduced either intentionally (i.e., for sport) or accidentally. Within Kthe United States, Kentucky’s native freshwater fish diversity is exceeded only by Alabama and Tennessee. This high diversity of native fishes corresponds to an abun- dance of water bodies and wide variety of aquatic habitats across the state – from swift upland streams to large sluggish rivers, oxbow lakes, and wetlands. Approximately 25 species are most frequently caught by anglers either for sport or food. Many of these species occur in streams and rivers statewide, while several are routinely stocked in public and private water bodies across the state, especially ponds and reservoirs. The largest proportion of Kentucky’s fish fauna (80%) includes darters, minnows, suckers, madtoms, smaller sunfishes, and other groups (e.g., lam- preys) that are rarely seen by most people.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Role of Cave Crickets (Rhaphidophoridae) in Central Texas Cave Ecosystems: Isotope Ratios (Δ13c, Δ15n) and Radio Tracking
    Final Report Examining the Role of Cave Crickets (Rhaphidophoridae) in Central Texas Cave Ecosystems: Isotope Ratios (δ13C, δ15N) and Radio Tracking Steven J. Taylor1, Keith Hackley2, Jean K. Krejca3, Michael J. Dreslik 1, Sallie E. Greenberg2, and Erin L. Raboin1 1Center for Biodiversity Illinois Natural History Survey 607 East Peabody Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 (217) 333-5702 [email protected] 2 Isotope Geochemistry Laboratory Illinois State Geological Survey 615 East Peabody Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 3Zara Environmental LLC 118 West Goforth Road Buda, Texas 78610 Illinois Natural History Survey Center for Biodiversity Technical Report 2004 (9) Prepared for: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center ERDC-CTC, ATTN: Michael L. Denight 2902 Newmark Drive Champaign, IL 61822-1076 27 September 2004 Cover: A cave cricket (Ceuthophilus The Red Imported Fire Ant (Solenopsis secretus) shedding its exuvium on a shrub (False Indigo, Amorpha fruticosa L.) outside invicta Buren, RIFA) has been shown to enter and of Big Red Cave. Photo by Jean K. Krejca. forage in caves in central Texas (Elliott 1992, 1994; Reddell 2001; Reddell and Cokendolpher 2001b). Many of these caves are home to federally endangered invertebrates (USFWS 1988, 1993, 2000) or closely related, often rare taxa (Reddell 2001, Reddell and Cokendolpher 2001a). The majority of these caves are small – at Fort Hood (Bell and Coryell counties), the mean length1 of the caves is 51.7 m (range 2.1 - 2571.6 m, n=105 caves). Few of the caves harbor large numbers of bats, perhaps because low ceiling heights increase their vulnerability to depredation by other vertebrate predators (e.g., raccoons, Procyon lotor).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Biological Inventory of the Cave and Karst Systems of The Nature Conservancy’s Sharp-Bingham Mountain Preserve James Godwin Alabama Natural Heritage Program Environmental Institute Auburn University Auburn, AL 36849 ©Alan Cressler 1 Introduction Overview of Karst and Caves (adapted from Palmer 2007; White 2008) Karst is a landform or landscape with the characteristics of caves, sinkholes, subterranean streams, and springs. These topographical features have formed from the dissolution, rather than mechanical, eroding of the underlying bedrock. This dissolutional process is based on the actions of a weak carbonic acid solution reacting with the basic limestone. Raindrops, as they pass through the atmosphere, pick up carbon dioxide and form a weak carbonic acid solution. Limestone, a type of calcium carbonate, is easily dissolved by this mildly acidic water. Over time rainwater percolates along horizontal and vertical fissures and joints of the limestone bedrock and these joints and fissures gradually become widened and deepened, eventually coalescing into an underground drainage system of conduits. Caves formed by this process are termed solution caves. While the lifespan of a cave, from the initial phase of development to deterioration, may be on the order of tens of thousands to a few million years, geologically they are regarded as being transient. Cave “life history” can be divided into the following sequential phases: initiation, enlargement, stagnation, and destruction. Each phase in the life cycle of a cave presents new invasion and niche expansion opportunities for organisms associated with these subterranean features. During the phase of initiation, as water moves through a multitude of fissures dissolving bedrock, the smallest fissures of 10 to 50 micrometers wide are enlarged to widths of 5 to 10 millimeters.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty Years of Cave Arthropod Sampling: Techniques and Best Practices J
    International Journal of Speleology 48 (1) 33-48 Tampa, FL (USA) January 2019 Available online at scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs International Journal of Speleology Off icial Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie Fifty years of cave arthropod sampling: techniques and best practices J. Judson Wynne1*, Francis G. Howarth2, Stefan Sommer1, and Brett G. Dickson3 1Department of Biological Sciences, Merriam-Powell Center for Environmental Research, Northern Arizona University, Box 5640, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA 2Department of Natural Sciences, Bernice P. Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice St., Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817, USA 3Conservation Science Partners, 11050 Pioneer Trail, Suite 202, Truckee, CA 96161 and Lab of Landscape Ecology and Conservation Biology, Landscape Conservation Initiative, Northern Arizona University, Box 5694, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA Abstract: Ever-increasing human pressures on cave biodiversity have amplified the need for systematic, repeatable, and intensive surveys of cave-dwelling arthropods to formulate evidence-based management decisions. We examined 110 papers (from 1967 to 2018) to: (i) understand how cave-dwelling invertebrates have been sampled; (ii) provide a summary of techniques most commonly applied and appropriateness of these techniques, and; (iii) make recommendations for sampling design improvement. Of the studies reviewed, over half (56) were biological inventories, 43 ecologically focused, seven were techniques papers, and four were conservation studies. Nearly one-half (48) of the papers applied systematic techniques. Few papers (24) provided enough information to repeat the study; of these, only 11 studies included cave maps. Most studies (56) used two or more techniques for sampling cave-dwelling invertebrates. Ten studies conducted ≥10 site visits per cave. The use of quantitative techniques was applied in 43 of the studies assessed.
    [Show full text]