DOCSLIB.ORG

Endangered St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

34696 Federal Register I Vol. 53, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7. 1988 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF ThE INTERIOR and has fewer dorsal rostra! spines Four comments were received. One (Smalley 1961). Federal agency saw no impact to their Fish and Wildlife Service A search of over 200 caves in north program by the proposal. The proposal Alabama has failed to find the Alabama was supported by the other three 50 CFR Part 17 cave shrimp anywhere but at the two commenters, including a Federal agency. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife localities (J.E. Cooper, pers. comm.). The the national conservation organization and Plants; Endangered Status for the type locality, Shelta Cave, lies within that owns Shelta Cave, and by a Alabama Cave Shrimp, Palaemonias the northwest limits of Huntsville, professional biologist Two of these Alabama. It is located in Warsaw commenters provided additional data. Alabamae limestone of Mississippian age in the After a thorough review and AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior Low Plateau (Cooper 1975). Shelta Cave consists ofthree large consideration of all information Interior. available, the Service has determined ACTION: Final rule. rooms with smaller alcoves. Water is present in all of the cave areas during that the Alabama cave shrimp SUMMARY: The Service determines the wet periods of the year. Water levels (Palaemonias alabamae) should be Alabama cave shrimp, Palaemonias fluctuate several feet during the year classified as an endangered species. alabamae, to be an endangered species and some areas of the cave become Procedures found at section 4(a)(1) of under the authority contained in the seasonally dry. The two pit entrances to the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. Endangered Species Act of 1973, as Shelta Cave are ownedby the National 1531 eq seq.) and regulations (50 CFR amended (Act). This obligate cave Speleological Society and are gated to Part 424) promulgated to implement the dweller has been found in only two control activity in the cave. The only listing provisions of the Act were caves, Shelta and Bobcat, in Madison other known population is in Bobcat followed. A species may be determined County, Alabama. Groundwater Cave, located on Redstone Arsenal, to be an endangered or threatened contamination, low population levels, under the control of the U.S. Army. species due to one or more of the five and collecting represent majorthreats to The available information indicates factors described in section 4(a)(1). this small shrimp. The shrimp was not the population in Shelta Cave has These factors and their application to observed in Shelta Cave during the declined and may be extirpated. Over the Alabama cave shrimp (Palaemonias biweekly surveys of aquatic cave life an 11-year period, Cooper and others alabamae) are as follows: over a twelve month period. In Bobcat collected or observed from one to 25 A. The present or threatened Cave, only two or three shrimp have shrimp on each of 19 visits (Cooper destruction, modification, or curtailment been observed on any single visit. This 1975). On two of these visits the shrimp ofits hdbitat or range. The only known determination implements the protection were not counted, but described as populations of Alabama cave shrimp of the Act for theAlabama cave shrimp. plentiful. During the period from occur in Shelta and Bobcat Caves. The EFFECTIVE DATE: Octobor 7, 1988. December 1985 to April 1986, biologists only population trend data is discussed made monthly trips to observe aquatic ADDRESS: The complete file for this rule in the “Background” section. is available for inspection by life in Shelta Cave but did not find any Groundwater contamination represents appointment during normal business shrimp. In April 1986, a study to observe a major threat to this cave-dwelling hours at the Jackson, Mississippi, Field aquatic life in Shelta Cave twice a species. Both caves are within the month for one year was initiated. No Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Huntsville Spring Branch and Indian Jackson Mall Office Center, Suite 316, cave shrimp were observed in Shelta Creek drainages, known areas of DDT Cave during this period. contamination (Environmental 300 Woodrow Wilson Avenue, Jackson, Threatened status was proposed for Mississippi 39213. Protection Agency 1986). They are not the Alabama cave shrimp on January 12, FOR FURThER INFORMATION CONTACT: known to be in the direct path of the 1977 (42 FR 2507). That proposal was contaminated flow at the present time. Mr. James H. Stewart at the above withdrawn on December 10, 1979 (44 FR address (601/965—4900, VFS 490.-4900). In any area where sinkholes occur, 70796), for administrathie reasons however, surface pollutants can easily SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: stemming from new listing requirements and rapidly enter the sub-surface Background of the 1978 amendments to the Act. This species was proposed for endangered aquifer. The Alabama cave shrimp, status on November 19, 1987 (52 FR B Qverutj/jzcjt,on for commercial, Polaernonias alabamae, is an albinistic 44578-44580). recreational, scientific, or educational cave shrimp known from only two caves purposes. Apparent low reproductive in Madison County, Alabama. (J.E. Suiemary of Comments and abilities, confined habitat, and inability Cooper. pers. comm.), This obligath cave Recommendations to elude captors make the Alabama shrimp was first collected in 1958 by Dr. In the November 19, 1987, proposed cave shrimp very susceptible to Thomas Poulson and described in 1961 rule and associated notifications, all collecting. Cooper (1975) found only by A.E. Smalley from a series of 20 interested parties were requested to eight attached eggs on Alabama cave shrimp collected in Sheila Cave (Cooper submit factual reports or information shrimp and indicated this species 1975). The Alabama cave shrimp is that might contribute to the development produced only one-third to ooe-half as colorless and largely transparent with a of a final rule. Appropriate State many eggs as females of the endangered total length of up to 20 mm (0.8 in.) agencies, county governments, Federal Kentucky cave shrimp. Other cave (Cooper 1975; Smalley 1961). The only agencies, scientific organizations, and specie.s are known to have extremely other species of Palaemonias is the other interested parties were contacted low reproductive rates compared to endangered Kentucky cave shrimp, P. and requested to comment. A closely related surface species (Paulson ganteri, known only from Mammoth newspaper notice was published in The 1961; Cooper 1975). As a result, any Cave, Kentucky. Palaemonias alabamae Birmingham News and in The Huntsville collection of adults can significantly is very similar to P. ganteri, but is Times on December 13, 1987, and in The affect population le~els.There are few smaller in size, has a shorter rostrum. Huntsville News on December 14, 1987. known collections of the Alabama cave generally lacks ventral rostra! spines which invited general public comment. shrimp, and these were made when the Federal Register / Vol. 53, No. 173 1 Wednesday, September 7. 1988 / Rules and Regulations 34697 species was apparently more common endangered by tj~ki~ig,an activity Federal involvement with this species (see Background). diffoult toprevent Publication ofcritical is expected to be minimal. The C. 1)i~aseand Predation. The habitat descriptions would make this continuing development of this region Alabama cave shrimp occurs with the species even more vulnerable and could lead to sub-surface water southern cavefish, Typhlichthys increase enforcement problems. All degradation that may involve the subterraneus, the cave salamander. involved parties and land owners have Environmental Protection Agency or Gyrinc~thiluspalleucus.and the cave been notified of the lcoation and other agencies with jurisdiction over crayfish. Aviti a.mbarzzs/onesi in one or importance of protecting this species’ groundwater. The Federal Housing both caves (Cooper 1975). It is probable habitat. Protection of this species’ Authority may be required to consult that all three prey upon young cave habitat will be addressed through the with the Service on Federal loans for shrimp (Barr and Kuehne 1971; Cooper recovery process and through the housing development withIn the cave’s 1975). section 7 jeopardy standard. Therefore, recharge area. Development on D. The inadequacy of existing it would not be prudent to determine Redstone Arsenal may require regulatory mechanisms. The Alabama critical habitat for theAlabama cave consultation with the U.S. Army. Department of Conservation and shrimp at this time, TheAct and implementing regulations Natural Resources recognizes the found at 50 CFR 17.21 set forth a series Alabama cave shrimp as a “species of Available Conservation Measures of general prohibitions and exceptions special concern” but does not provide Conservation measures provided to that apply to all endangered wildlife. any legal protection (Bouchard 1976). species listed as endangered or These prohibitions, in part, make it Shelta Cave is owned by the National threatened under the Endangered illegal for ~anyperson subject to the Speleological Society and is currently Species Act include recognition, jurisdiction of the United States to take, gated to exclude unauthorized visitors. recovery actions, requirements for import or export, ship in interstate Bobcat Cave is owned by Redstone Federal protection, and prohibitions commerce in the course of commercial Arsenal and admittance is controlled. against certain practices. Recognition activity, or sell or offer for sale in While admittance to the caves is through listing encourages and results in interstate or foreign commerce any restricted by the owners, adequate conservation actions by Federal, State, listed species. It also is illegal to regulations do not exist to discourage and private agencies, groups, and possess, sell, deliver, carry, transport, or collection of the species by those who individuals. The Endangered Species ship any such wildlife that has been are able to gain entrance to the caves. Act provides for possible land taken illegally.
Recommended publications
  • Research Funding (Total $2,552,481) $15,000 2019

    Research Funding (Total $2,552,481) $15,000 2019

    CURRICULUM VITAE TENNESSEE AQUARIUM CONSERVATION INSTITUTE 175 BAYLOR SCHOOL RD CHATTANOOGA, TN 37405 RESEARCH FUNDING (TOTAL $2,552,481) $15,000 2019. Global Wildlife Conservation. Rediscovering the critically endangered Syr-Darya Shovelnose Sturgeon. $10,000 2019. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency. Propagation of the Common Logperch as a host for endangered mussel larvae. $8,420 2019. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency. Monitoring for the Laurel Dace. $4,417 2019. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency. Examining interactions between Laurel Dace (Chrosomus saylori) and sunfish $12,670 2019. Trout Unlimited. Southern Appalachian Brook Trout propagation for reintroduction to Shell Creek. $106,851 2019. Private Donation. Microplastic accumulation in fishes of the southeast. $1,471. 2019. AZFA-Clark Waldram Conservation Grant. Mayfly propagation for captive propagation programs. $20,000. 2019. Tennessee Valley Authority. Assessment of genetic diversity within Blotchside Logperch. $25,000. 2019. Riverview Foundation. Launching Hidden Rivers in the Southeast. $11,170. 2018. Trout Unlimited. Propagation of Southern Appalachian Brook Trout for Supplemental Reintroduction. $1,471. 2018. AZFA Clark Waldram Conservation Grant. Climate Change Impacts on Headwater Stream Vertebrates in Southeastern United States $1,000. 2018. Hamilton County Health Department. Step 1 Teaching Garden Grants for Sequoyah School Garden. $41,000. 2018. Riverview Foundation. River Teachers: Workshops for Educators. $1,000. 2018. Tennessee Valley Authority. Youth Freshwater Summit $20,000. 2017. Tennessee Valley Authority. Lake Sturgeon Propagation. $7,500 2017. Trout Unlimited. Brook Trout Propagation. $24,783. 2017. Tennessee Wildlife Resource Agency. Assessment of Percina macrocephala and Etheostoma cinereum populations within the Duck River Basin. $35,000. 2017. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Status surveys for conservation status of Ashy (Etheostoma cinereum) and Redlips (Etheostoma maydeni) Darters.
  • BYE, BYE BIRDIE Introduction

    BYE, BYE BIRDIE Introduction

    BYE, BYE BIRDIE introduction Humankind is now precipitating the extinction of large numbers Studies For Our Global Future of animals, birds, insects, and plants. Despite human activity, extinction occurs at a natural rate of about one to three species per year. Current estimates suggest that we are losing species at 1,000 to 10,000 times the natural rate. This means that concept dozens of species could be going extinct every day. Between The rate of wildlife endangerment is human impact on the natural world and issues brought on by an increasing and difficult decisions are required increasingly warm climate, over 500 known species could face to determine how to prioritize efforts to save 1 extinction by 2040. endangered species. objectives Scientists believe that many of the species being lost carry untold potential benefits for the health and economic stability Students will be able to: of the planet. With limited funding available for conservation, • Develop and apply a list of criteria that can many believe that humanity should make some tough choices be used to make decisions about protecting and decide which species can and should be saved. endangered species. • Conduct research on an endangered species Vocabulary: biodiversity, ecosystems, ecosystem services, and effectively communicate to classmates endangered species, extinction, indicator species, IUCN Red List its importance and why it should be saved. of Threatened Species, keystone species, poaching, umbrella subjects species Environmental Science (General and AP), Biology, English Language Arts materials skills Critical thinking, researching, comparing and • Research Guide (provided) evaluating, public speaking, decision making method Students determine a list of criteria to use procedure when deciding the fate of endangered species, then conduct research on a specific species 1.
  • Geological Survey of Alabama Ecosystems Investigations Program

    Geological Survey of Alabama Ecosystems Investigations Program

    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA Berry H. (Nick) Tew, Jr. State Geologist ECOSYSTEMS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM Stuart W. McGregor Director WATER QUALITY AND BIOLOGICAL MONITORING IN BOBCAT AND MATTHEWS CAVES, REDSTONE ARSENAL, ALABAMA, 1990-2014 OPEN-FILE REPORT 1411 By Stuart W. McGregor and Patrick E. O’Neil with geochemical analyses by Mirza A. Beg, Rick Wagner, and Robert E. Meintzer Prepared in cooperation with U. S. Army, Redstone Arsenal Environmental and Cultural Resources Directorate Under Contract No. W9124P-13-P-0180 Tuscaloosa, Alabama 2014 CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................2 Study area.........................................................................................................................................3 Methods............................................................................................................................................3 Results and discussion .....................................................................................................................4 Water quality ..............................................................................................................................4
  • Cave Biodiversity of the Southern Cumberland Plateau Kirk S

    Cave Biodiversity of the Southern Cumberland Plateau Kirk S

    b-3-guidebook_Guidebook3 6/18/2014 10:01 PM Page 159 Cave Biodiversity of the Southern Cumberland Plateau Kirk S. Zigler, NSS 62696; Matthew L. Niemiller, NSS 53235; and Danté B. Fenolio The South Cumberland Region of Tennessee, Alabama, and Georgia (Figure 1) is known for its tremendous diversity of caves, including huge pits, massive stream passages, and tight crawls. Less well known is that the region also supports tremendous cave biodiversity (Niemiller, Zigler, and Fenolio, 2013). Here we discuss many of the species that inhabit caves of the region, focusing on the southern Cumberland Plateau. Cave Biodiversity Four ecological classes of organisms can be found in caves: trogloxenes, subtroglophiles, eutroglophiles, and troglobionts (Culver and Pipan, 2009). Trogloxenes are not typically found in caves and cannot persist there for long periods of time. They must either find their way back to the surface or ultimately perish. Subtroglophiles are commonly found in caves but are associated with surface habitats for at least part of their life cycle. Some are seasonal inhabitants of caves and others move back and forth from cave to surface habitats for feeding, such as cave-roosting bats, cave crickets, and Allegheny Woodrats (Neotoma magister). Eutroglophiles are commonly found underground but can be found in surface habitats. Unlike trogloxenes and subtroglophiles, eutroglophiles can complete their entire life cycle Figure 1 - The South Cumberland Region at the junction of underground. Examples include the Cave Salamander Tennessee, Alabama, and Georgia. Figure courtesy of Nick Hollingshead. (Eurycea lucifuga) and the Cave Orbweaver (Meta ovalis). Troglobionts are obligate, permanent residents of subterranean habitats.
  • California Freshwater Shrimparesmall.Females Areusually (Corpus)

    California Freshwater Shrimparesmall.Females Areusually (Corpus)

    Endangered SpecU.S. Environmental iesFacts Protection Agency California Freshwater Shrimp Syncaris pacifica Description and Ecology Status Endangered, listed October 31, 1988. of Marin, Sonoma and Napa counties. They are still found in all three counties but in much fewer numbers and fewer Critical Habitat Not designated. streams. The distribution of the shrimp has been separated Appearance The California freshwater shrimp is a 10- into four drainage units: 1) tributary streams of the lower legged crustacean belonging to the atyid family. Of the three Russian River drainage, that flow westward to the Pacific other atyid members in North America, two are also listed Ocean, 2) coastal streams flowing westward directly into as endangered (Kentucky cave shrimp (Palaemonias ganteri) the Pacific Ocean, 3) streams draining into Tomales Bay, Female California freshwater shrimp with egg s, courtes y of Larr y Serpa and Alabama cave shrimp (Palaemonias alabamae)) and one and 4) streams flowing southward into San Pablo Bay. While which once inhabited coastal streams in California is believed California freshwater shrimp in laboratories can tolerate The California freshwater shrimp to be extinct (Pasadena shrimp (Syncaris pasadenae)). brackish waters, they are unable to tolerate ocean salinities. is an endangered species. These species were believed to have been isolated from a It is thought that the isolated streams that harbor these Endangered species are marine environment during the Jurassic period. They are shrimp were once connected, but later separated by geologic plants and animals that are anatomically distinguished from other shrimp by the length of uplift and rising sea level. in immediate danger of their pincer-like claws (chelae) and the bristles (setae) at the Habitat Within the low elevation-low gradient streams tips of the first two chelae.
  • Environmental Report (ER) (TVA 2003) in Conjunction with Its Application for Renewal of the BFN Ols, As Provided for by the Following NRC Regulations

    Environmental Report (ER) (TVA 2003) in Conjunction with Its Application for Renewal of the BFN Ols, As Provided for by the Following NRC Regulations

    Biological Assessment Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal Review Limestone County, Alabama October 2004 Docket Numbers 50-259, 50-260, and 50-296 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Biological Assessment of the Potential Effects on Endangered or Threatened Species from the Proposed License Renewal for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 1.0 Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licenses the operation of domestic nuclear power plants in accordance with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and NRC implementing regulations. The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) operates Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 (BFN) pursuant to NRC operating license (OL) numbers DPR-33, DPR-52, DPR-68, which expire on December 20, 2013, June 28, 2014, and July 2, 2016, respectively. TVA has prepared an Environmental Report (ER) (TVA 2003) in conjunction with its application for renewal of the BFN OLs, as provided for by the following NRC regulations: C Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 54, “Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants,” Section 54.23, Contents of application - environmental information (10 CFR 54.23). C Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 51, “Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions,” Section 51.53, Postconstruction environmental reports, Subsection 51.53(c), Operating license renewal stage (10 CFR 51.53(c)). The renewed OLs would allow up to 20 additional years of plant operation beyond the current licensed operating term. No major refurbishment or replacement of important systems, structures, or components are expected during the 20-year BFN license renewal term.
  • SCIENTIFIC COLLECTING PERMITS Valid: One Year from Date of Issuance Resident - Nonresident

    SCIENTIFIC COLLECTING PERMITS Valid: One Year from Date of Issuance Resident - Nonresident

    SCP – Page 1 SCIENTIFIC COLLECTING PERMITS Valid: one year from date of issuance Resident - Nonresident Alabama Game, Fish and Wildlife Law; Article 12; beginning with 9-11-231 PRIVILEGE: • An INDIVIDUAL, EDUCATIONAL OR AGENCY SCP authorizes permit holder to collect any wild invertebrate or vertebrate species or their eggs in this state for propagation or scientific purposes. • A FEDERAL / STATE PROTECTED SCP authorizes permit holder to collect endangered / protected species (copy of USFWS permit must be submitted if required by federal law). PERMITS TYPES: • INDIVIDUAL SCP: for an individual collector. • EDUCATIONAL SCP: for a professor/teacher and their current students. • AGENCY MEMBER SCP: for an agency and their current members. • FEDERAL / STATE PROTECTED SCP: Issued in addition to an Individual, Educational or Agency SCP. STUDENTS / AGENCY MEMBERS: • Each student / agency member must complete the Educational & Agency SCP Dependent Information Form and be approved to work under an Educational or Agency SCP. (See The SCP section online at https://www.outdooralabama.com/licenses/commercial-licenses-permits) COLLECTIONS: • A SCP Collection Data Form must be completed and faxed for approval prior to any scheduled collection. (See The SCP section online at https://www.outdooralabama.com/licenses/commercial-licenses-permits) • Annual reports required. Must be submitted prior to renewal requests. RESTRICTIONS: • Must have a SCP to obtain a Federal / State Protected Species permit. • Federal / State Protected permit must meet strict guidelines prior to issuance. • No species collected are to be sold. NOTE: • Electronic system processes all applications and reports. • For areas under Marine Resources jurisdiction, call (251) 861-2882. • Applicant should allow 3 weeks for processing and issuance.
  • Environmental Red Flag Summary Environmental Red Flag Summary Us 68X and Us 231X Planning Study Kytc Item No

    Environmental Red Flag Summary Environmental Red Flag Summary Us 68X and Us 231X Planning Study Kytc Item No

    APPENDIX E – ENVIRONMENTAL RED FLAG SUMMARY ENVIRONMENTAL RED FLAG SUMMARY US 68X AND US 231X PLANNING STUDY KYTC ITEM NO. N/A Warren County US 68X from south of Robinson Avenue (MP 1.000) to north of Avenue of Champions (MP 1.626) US 231X from north of Normal Street (MP 2.300) to south of Holly Drive (MP 2.600) Prepared for: Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Central Office Division of Environmental Analysis Highway District 3 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. November 1, 2017 ENVIRONMENTAL RED FLAG SUMMARY US 68X AND US 231X PLANNING STUDY KYTC ITEM NO. N/A Executive Summary This Environmental Red Flag Summary has been prepared for the US 68X and US 231X Planning Study in Bowling Green, Warren County, Kentucky (KYTC Item No. not assigned). The purpose of the Planning Study is to evaluate operational and safety improvements at the Russellville Road intersections with Morgantown Road and University Boulevard and options to widen the underpass on Russellville Road. The purpose of this Environmental Red Flag Summary is to identify environmental resources of significance, potential jurisdictional features, and other environmental areas of concern that should be considered during project development. Natural and human environment resources within the study area were identified from secondary sources, as well as a pedestrian survey conducted on August 30, 2017. Based on this information, the key environmental features within the study area include: Surface Streams: None present in the study area or immediate vicinity. Wetlands: None present in the study area or immediate vicinity. Threatened and Endangered Species: Seventeen (17) federal-listed species (14 endangered, 3 threatened) have the potential to occur in the study area, with 10 federal-listed species recorded within 5-miles of the study area.
  • Tennessee-Alabama-Georgia (TAG) Cave Teaching and Learning Module

    Tennessee-Alabama-Georgia (TAG) Cave Teaching and Learning Module

    Tennessee-Alabama-Georgia (TAG) Cave Teaching and Learning Module K. Denise Kendall, Ph.D. Matthew L. Niemiller, Ph.D. Annette S. Engel, Ph.D. Funding provided by 1 Dear Educator, We are pleased to present you with a TAG (Tennessee – Alabama – Georgia) cave-themed teaching and learning module. This module aims to engage Kindergarten through 5th grade students in subterranean biology, while fostering awareness and positive attitudes toward cave biodiversity. We have chosen cave fauna for this teaching module because students have a fascination with atypical organisms and environments. Moreover, little attention has been given to subterranean biodiversity in public outreach programs. Many students will likely be intrigued by the unique fauna and composition of subterranean landscapes. Therefore, we hope these lessons enable teachers to introduce students to the unique organisms and habitat below their feet. The module presents students with background information and outlines lessons that aim to reinforce and discover aspects of the content. Lessons in this module focus primarily on habitat formation, biodiversity, evolution, and system flows in subterranean landscapes. We intend for this module to be a guide, and, thus, we have included baseline material and activity plans. Teachers are welcome to use the lessons in any order they wish, use portions of lessons, and may modify the lessons as they please. Furthermore, educators may share these lessons with other school districts and teachers; however, please do not receive monetary gain for lessons in the module. Funding for the TAG Cave module has been graciously provided by the Cave Conservation Foundation, a non-profit 501(c)3 organization dedicated to promoting and facilitating the conservation, management, and knowledge of cave and karst resources.
  • 11Th Research Symposium at Mammoth Cave National Park Shannon R

    11Th Research Symposium at Mammoth Cave National Park Shannon R

    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Mammoth Cave Research Symposia 11th Research Symposium 2016 Apr 18th, 8:00 AM - Apr 20th, 7:00 PM Proceedings for Celebrating the Diversity of Research in the Mammoth Cave Region: 11th Research Symposium at Mammoth Cave National Park Shannon R. Trimboli Editor Western Kentucky University, MCICSL, [email protected] Luke E. Dodd, Editor De'Etra Young, Editor Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/mc_reserch_symp Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Forest Sciences Commons, Geology Commons, Hydrology Commons, Other Earth Sciences Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Shannon R. Trimboli Editor; Luke E. Dodd, Editor; and De'Etra Young, Editor, "Proceedings for Celebrating the Diversity of Research in the Mammoth Cave Region: 11th Research Symposium at Mammoth Cave National Park" (April 18, 2016). Mammoth Cave Research Symposia. Paper 1. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/mc_reserch_symp/11th_Research_Symposium_2016/Complete_Proceedings/1 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mammoth Cave Research Symposia by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Celebrating the Diversity of Research in the Mammoth Cave Region 11th Research Symposium at Mammoth Cave National Park Proceedings April 18-20, 2016 Mammoth Cave National Park Training Center Acknowledgements Putting together a research symposium and the corresponding proceedings are more than any one person can do alone. Many people have helped make this year’s symposium and the proceedings you are holding a success. I am extremely grateful to everyone who has helped in any way, even if it was something as seemingly simple as an encouraging smile, a well-timed joke, or being an extra brain when mine was too frazzled to think straight.
  • Fifty Years of Cave Arthropod Sampling: Techniques and Best Practices J

    Fifty Years of Cave Arthropod Sampling: Techniques and Best Practices J

    International Journal of Speleology 48 (1) 33-48 Tampa, FL (USA) January 2019 Available online at scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs International Journal of Speleology Off icial Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie Fifty years of cave arthropod sampling: techniques and best practices J. Judson Wynne1*, Francis G. Howarth2, Stefan Sommer1, and Brett G. Dickson3 1Department of Biological Sciences, Merriam-Powell Center for Environmental Research, Northern Arizona University, Box 5640, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA 2Department of Natural Sciences, Bernice P. Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice St., Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817, USA 3Conservation Science Partners, 11050 Pioneer Trail, Suite 202, Truckee, CA 96161 and Lab of Landscape Ecology and Conservation Biology, Landscape Conservation Initiative, Northern Arizona University, Box 5694, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA Abstract: Ever-increasing human pressures on cave biodiversity have amplified the need for systematic, repeatable, and intensive surveys of cave-dwelling arthropods to formulate evidence-based management decisions. We examined 110 papers (from 1967 to 2018) to: (i) understand how cave-dwelling invertebrates have been sampled; (ii) provide a summary of techniques most commonly applied and appropriateness of these techniques, and; (iii) make recommendations for sampling design improvement. Of the studies reviewed, over half (56) were biological inventories, 43 ecologically focused, seven were techniques papers, and four were conservation studies. Nearly one-half (48) of the papers applied systematic techniques. Few papers (24) provided enough information to repeat the study; of these, only 11 studies included cave maps. Most studies (56) used two or more techniques for sampling cave-dwelling invertebrates. Ten studies conducted ≥10 site visits per cave. The use of quantitative techniques was applied in 43 of the studies assessed.
  • Illinois Cave Amphipod (Gammarus Acherondytes) Recovery Plan

    Illinois Cave Amphipod (Gammarus Acherondytes) Recovery Plan

    Illinois Cave Amphipod (Gammarus acherondytes) Recovery Plan U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Great Lakes-Big Rivers Region (Region 3) Fort Snelling, Minnesota llIinois Cave Amphipod ( Gammarus acherondytes) Recovery Plan Prepared by Illinois Cave Amphipod Recovery Team Ms. Joan Bade, Recovery Team Leader Dr. Julian J. Lewis Illinois Department of Natural Resources J. Lewis and Associates BioI. Consulting Chester, Illinois Clarksville, Indiana Dr. Steven J. Taylor Ms. Diane Tecic Illinois Natural History Survey Illinois Department of Natural Resources Champaign, Illinois Granite City, Illinois Dr. Donald W. Webb Mr. Dennis Brand Illinois Natural History Survey Waterloo, Illinois Champaign, Illinois Mr. Kenneth Hartman, Jr. Dr. Samuel V. Panno Waterloo, Illinois Illinois State Geological Survey Champaign, Illinois Mr. Philip Moss Ozark Underground Laboratory Protem, Missouri For , Region 3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ft. Snelling, Minnesota 55111-4056 ~ Appro~e~:, (;)UQ l ~ - f'"J-"\ Regional Director, U,S. Fish and Wildlir.JService Date: j l2.4.1l () 'L Disclaimer Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the USFWS. They represent the official position of the USFWS only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved.