DOCSLIB.ORG

© in This Web Service Cambridge University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01937-9 - Plagiarism in Latin Literature Scott McGill Index More information Index Adaeus 147–148, 150, 154–155, 156, 157, triumph 44 158, 159 defeat of Anthony and Cleopatra 44–45 Adelphoe see Terence Virgil and Augustus 217–220 aemulatio/productive change 50, 156–158 Vitruvius’ relationship with Augustus 43–45 improving sources as a recognized goal in Ausonius 9, 12, 13–16, 91 translation/imitation 156, 207 authorship psychological in character 156 creativity/originality, and 19–20, 21–22, 39, as synonym for imitari 188 40–41, 50–51 Aeneid (Virgil) 170, 172–173, 205 plagiarism as means of claiming 2–3, 11–12, and Homer 193–195, 204–206 13–16, 22–24 Varius editor 214 recognized in Roman antiquity 16–17, 67, 83, Afranius, Lucius 127–128 124, 149, 151, 152, 199, 200 Compitalia 198 Avitus, Quintus Octavius 178–179, 183 Albinus, Rufius 127–128, 174 defence of Virgil see Macrobius Bavius 185 Alexander the Great 45 booksellers/book trade 11–12 Alexandria 36–37, 44, 45 booksellers’ ownership of material text 16, alieni usurpatio 9, 199–200 82–83 allusions 166, 197 booksellers’ right of usus 16, 83 Apollinaris, Sidonius 222 Brutus see Cicero Aristophanes of Byzantium 36–37, 44–45 Artemon 158–159, 160–161, 161–162 Cassius of Parma 211 Astronomica (Manilius) 57–60 Catullus 47, 77 demonstrating Manilius’ originality 57–58, Cicero 1–3, 18–19, 190 59–60, 220 Brutus 2–3, 19, 22, 24, 165 derivativeness and plagiarism 59–60 conceptualizing plagiarism as stealing/intent to notion of plagiarism 58–59 deceive 2–3 Atticus 1–2 distinguishing legitimate imitation from attribution stealing 2–3, 6, 165 attributed works the norm in Latin literary letter to Atticus joking about plagiarism 1–2 culture 17–18 naming sources 51 implying property 200, 202 ownership of content of work as author 16, 83 plays belonging to authors as attributed rhetoric 60, 61, 62 works 124 Verrines 168–169 of sententiae 67 circulation Augustus 57, 218–220 oral and textual 6, 16–17 addressed in De architectura 35, 38, 41, 44–45 see also publication ordering Cassius’ death 211 Clodius, Servius 38 Palatine library 26, 44 Codex Salmasianus 217–218 promoting the standing of specialists 43 Colax (Menander) 126–127, 130–131, 131–132 resembling Ptolemy 44 Colax (Naevius) 123, 134 235 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01937-9 - Plagiarism in Latin Literature Scott McGill Index More information 236 Index Colax (Plautus) 123, 134 friendship with Seneca the Elder 164 comedy see under Greece; see Terence Gellius, Aulus 180–181 Commorientes (Plautus) 136–138 Georgics (Virgil) 58–59, 210 Compitalia (Afranius) 198 ghostwriting 100, 140–143 Controversiae see Seneca the Elder and plagiarism 14, 140–141 copyright and plagiarism 10–12, 36 Greece and commercial book trade 11–12 Old and New Comedy 6, 7, 116, 118 plagiarism 6–7 De architectura see Vitruvius evidence 6, 7, 20 Diphilus migrating from Greece to Rome 7, 116 Synapothescontes 136–138, 139 terms for plagiarism 6–7 Donatus, Aelius 117, 118, 119, 210–211 Donatus auctus 218–220 Hieria, Plotia 212, 213–214 Donatus, Tiberius Claudius 183, 184, 212, 213–214 Historia naturalis (Pliny the Elder) 46–56 Dorus the Bookseller 83 close repetition in research as plagiarism 25 demonstrating Pliny’s scholarly effort and Eclogues (Virgil) 210–211, 215–216 research 53–55 not forgeries 210 flattering Titus and demonstrating devotion Egypt 47–48, 55–56 Augustus’ defeat of Anthony and Cleopatra giving Pliny’s sources 25–26, 48–49, 51–53, 55 44–45 notion of plagiarism 50–53 plagiarism 36–37 plagiarists’ failure to cite sources 25–26, 49–50, Ptolemy see Ptolemy 52–53 Ennius 2–3, 165 promoting Pliny’s historical objectivity 47 Eugraphius 118, 119, 131 promoting Pliny’s virtues and authority 46–47, Eunuchus see Terence 48, 51, 52–56, 220 Eunuchus (Menander) 121, 122, 130–131 Homer 38, 57, 179, 193–195, 204–206 Eusebius 7, 29 Iliad 217 Eustathius 193–195, 196–197, 204 Little Iliad 216 Evangelus 185, 186 Odyssey 217 exempla/exemplarity 68–69 Phocais 216 see also imitatio/imitation as victim of plagiarism 216–217 Horace 7, 26–27, 185, 211, 215 Faustus, Perellius 178–179, 183 Fidentius see Martial Iliad (Homer) 217 forgery 81, 94 imitatio/imitation 2–3, 6, 9 compared to plagiarism 3–4, 210 allusions 166, 197 Eclogues not forgeries 210 audiences not always assuming imitatio 195 Fortunatus, Venantius 8 concealing sources a facet of imitatio 196–197 fructus legendi 187–189 cultural norm of imitatio 6, 68–69, 188, 189, furtum 8–9, 10 191–192, 197 manifestum furtum designating theft caught imitating across borders of rhetorical prose/ in the act 95 poetry 163–164 meaning “plagiarism” 49–50, 58–59, 94, 116, improving a source a recognized goal in 123, 136–137, 138, 141 imitation 156 Fuscus, Arellius 147–151, 154–158, 160, 167, 207 legitimate imitation 2–3, 21–22 exposure to plagiarism accusation 147–151 proper approach to imitatio 39, 62–63, 71, imitating lines of Virgil 163–164 204–207, 208–209 response to accusation 154–158, 162–163 exempla/exemplarity, importance of 68–69 authorial intention 155, 160 and fructus legendi 187–189 translation and plagiarism 156–158, 207 hiding sources 22–24, 25–26, 40, 41, 63, 71, 162, value of Fuscus promoted 156 165–166, 193–196 inert following of models 40, 50–51, 59–60, 71 Gallio, Junius 164–167 measuring imitation against its source friendship with Ovid 165, 166 207–208 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01937-9 - Plagiarism in Latin Literature Scott McGill Index More information Index 237 and plagiarism 159–160, 165, 166–167, 189–190, Seneca’s denial of his plagiarism 158, 196–197 160–163 distancing from plagiarism by enlisting unfounded allegations that Silo plagiarized his imitatio as cultural norm 189 sententia 167–177 plagiarism different from a poor version of Laverna, “goddess of thieves” 9 imitation 27–28 Lenaeus 33–34, 38 plagiarism used metaphorically to highlight Little Iliad (Homer) 216 similarity 26–27 Livy 48 productive imitation loosely defined 21–22 Lucilius 200 proper approach to imitatio 39, 62–63, 71, Luscius Lanuvinus see Terence 204–207, 208–209 legitimate imitation 2–3, 21–22 Macrobius 9, 174, 179–181; see also Saturnalia reach of imitatio not universal in Latin poetry Maecenas 163–164, 214 166–167 Maevius 185 research 24–26 Manilius, Marcus 69 citations 25–26, 41, 51–52 Astronomica 57–60 close repetition in research as plagiarism 25, demonstrating Manilius’ originality 57–58, 50–51 59–60, 220 contestability of research methods 40 derivativeness and plagiarism 59–60 and imitation 25, 27–28, 40 notion of plagiarism 58–59 legitimate research practices 71 imitating earlier writers 58 plagiarism different from a poor version of Martial 8–9, 215 research 27–28 accusations and genre of epigram 76–85 role in Latin literature 19–20, 21, 198–199 Fidentinus 74–76, 78–82, 83–84, 85–93 Institutio (Priscian) 69–73 legal imagery/legalisms 88–89, 95, 96, 97 legitimate research practices and plagiarism 71 literary marketplace 104, 105–106 promoting virtues of Priscian’s text 70, 72–73, meta-poetry 220 stylistic irony 97–98 using plagiarism to explain shortcomings/pre- through choice of meter 97, 101–102 empt criticism 70–72 patronage 85–93 using plagiarism to present favorably as an Quintianus 86–87 author 72–73 Paulus 74, 82–83 intentions of authors “performed I” 78–79, 91–93, 98–99, 106–107, innocence and lack of intention to deceive 109–110, 220–221 129–130, 131–132, 155, 157, 160, 161–163, 165 plagiarism accusations and self-promotion biographical details 147, 160, 161–163, 167, 77–78, 92, 98–99, 103–104, 106–107, 176, 197 109–110 critical authority/insight through friendship plagiarism accusations as entertainment 7, 165 75–76, 89–90, 91–92, 98, 103, 110–111 intentional fallacy 22–24 revealing cultural assumptions 1–2, 16 interpreting intentions and prejudice/ plagiarism as threat to authorial identity perception 24, 34, 147, 174–175, 196–197 77–78, 81 linking intention to aemulatio as a cultural plagiarius 8–9, 88–89 norm 156, 157 satiric first-person persona 78–79 means of identifying plagiarism 24, 34, 155–156, use of stable irony 83–84, 87, 95 157, 166–167, 172 wholesale plagiarism of epigrams 83–84, invective and personal attack 6, 28, 33–34 94–95, 105 Menander 7, 117, 127–128, 131 Jefferson, Thomas 222 accusations that Afranius plagiarized his work 198 Laelius, Gaius 136–137, 141, 142 Colax 126–127, 130–131, 131–132 Latro, Marcus Porcius 158–163 Eunuchus 121, 122, 130–131 friendship with Seneca the Elder 158, 162, 171 modern definitions of plagiarism 1–3, 9, 36 Hellenophobia as biographical detail 161, 162 analogous to identity theft 3–4, 11–12 leading declaimer 171 and ancient Rome 4 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01937-9 - Plagiarism in Latin Literature Scott McGill Index More information 238 Index Naevius 2–3 disapproval and shaming 15, 38, 89, 183 allegations of Terence’s reuse of work 123–125, divorce 38 126–127, 129, 131–132 exile from Egypt 37 Colax 123, 134 harm to reputation 125–126, 133 Ennius borrowing from 165 Phocais (Homer) 216 Phormio see Terence Odyssey (Homer) 217 plagiarism open literary tradition and plagiarism see under aesthetic grounds/insufficient change 10, 11, Macrobius 20–22, 25, 50, 191–193 Ovid 149 and authorship 2–3, 11–12, 13–16, 22–24 and Etna 200–201 and authorial/literary value 20–21, 28–29 friendship with Gallio 165, 166 and credit 1–2,
Recommended publications
  • Transantiquity

    Transantiquity

    TransAntiquity TransAntiquity explores transgender practices, in particular cross-dressing, and their literary and figurative representations in antiquity. It offers a ground-breaking study of cross-dressing, both the social practice and its conceptualization, and its interaction with normative prescriptions on gender and sexuality in the ancient Mediterranean world. Special attention is paid to the reactions of the societies of the time, the impact transgender practices had on individuals’ symbolic and social capital, as well as the reactions of institutionalized power and the juridical systems. The variety of subjects and approaches demonstrates just how complex and widespread “transgender dynamics” were in antiquity. Domitilla Campanile (PhD 1992) is Associate Professor of Roman History at the University of Pisa, Italy. Filippo Carlà-Uhink is Lecturer in Classics and Ancient History at the University of Exeter, UK. After studying in Turin and Udine, he worked as a lecturer at the University of Heidelberg, Germany, and as Assistant Professor for Cultural History of Antiquity at the University of Mainz, Germany. Margherita Facella is Associate Professor of Greek History at the University of Pisa, Italy. She was Visiting Associate Professor at Northwestern University, USA, and a Research Fellow of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation at the University of Münster, Germany. Routledge monographs in classical studies Menander in Contexts Athens Transformed, 404–262 BC Edited by Alan H. Sommerstein From popular sovereignty to the dominion
  • Magic in Private and Public Lives of the Ancient Romans

    Magic in Private and Public Lives of the Ancient Romans

    COLLECTANEA PHILOLOGICA XXIII, 2020: 53–72 http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.23.04 Idaliana KACZOR Uniwersytet Łódzki MAGIC IN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LIVES OF THE ANCIENT ROMANS The Romans practiced magic in their private and public life. Besides magical practices against the property and lives of people, the Romans also used generally known and used protective and healing magic. Sometimes magical practices were used in official religious ceremonies for the safety of the civil and sacral community of the Romans. Keywords: ancient magic practice, homeopathic magic, black magic, ancient Roman religion, Roman religious festivals MAGIE IM PRIVATEN UND ÖFFENTLICHEN LEBEN DER ALTEN RÖMER Die Römer praktizierten Magie in ihrem privaten und öffentlichen Leben. Neben magische Praktik- en gegen das Eigentum und das Leben von Menschen, verwendeten die Römer auch allgemein bekannte und verwendete Schutz- und Heilmagie. Manchmal wurden magische Praktiken in offiziellen religiösen Zeremonien zur Sicherheit der bürgerlichen und sakralen Gemeinschaft der Römer angewendet. Schlüsselwörter: alte magische Praxis, homöopathische Magie, schwarze Magie, alte römi- sche Religion, Römische religiöse Feste Magic, despite our sustained efforts at defining this term, remains a slippery and obscure concept. It is uncertain how magic has been understood and practised in differ- ent cultural contexts and what the difference is (if any) between magical and religious praxis. Similarly, no satisfactory and all-encompassing definition of ‘magic’ exists. It appears that no singular concept of ‘magic’ has ever existed: instead, this polyvalent notion emerged at the crossroads of local custom, religious praxis, superstition, and politics of the day. Individual scholars of magic, positioning themselves as ostensi- bly objective observers (an etic perspective), mostly defined magic in opposition to religion and overemphasised intercultural parallels over differences1.
  • Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C

    Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Bernard, Seth G., "Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C." (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 492. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Abstract MEN AT WORK: PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION, LABOR, AND SOCIETY AT MID-REPUBLICAN ROME, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard C. Brian Rose, Supervisor of Dissertation This dissertation investigates how Rome organized and paid for the considerable amount of labor that went into the physical transformation of the Middle Republican city. In particular, it considers the role played by the cost of public construction in the socioeconomic history of the period, here defined as 390 to 168 B.C. During the Middle Republic period, Rome expanded its dominion first over Italy and then over the Mediterranean. As it developed into the political and economic capital of its world, the city itself went through transformative change, recognizable in a great deal of new public infrastructure.
  • The Imperial Cult and the Individual

    The Imperial Cult and the Individual

    THE IMPERIAL CULT AND THE INDIVIDUAL: THE NEGOTIATION OF AUGUSTUS' PRIVATE WORSHIP DURING HIS LIFETIME AT ROME _______________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Department of Ancient Mediterranean Studies at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy _____________________________________________________ by CLAIRE McGRAW Dr. Dennis Trout, Dissertation Supervisor MAY 2019 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled THE IMPERIAL CULT AND THE INDIVIDUAL: THE NEGOTIATION OF AUGUSTUS' PRIVATE WORSHIP DURING HIS LIFETIME AT ROME presented by Claire McGraw, a candidate for the degree of doctor of philosophy, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. _______________________________________________ Professor Dennis Trout _______________________________________________ Professor Anatole Mori _______________________________________________ Professor Raymond Marks _______________________________________________ Professor Marcello Mogetta _______________________________________________ Professor Sean Gurd DEDICATION There are many people who deserve to be mentioned here, and I hope I have not forgotten anyone. I must begin with my family, Tom, Michael, Lisa, and Mom. Their love and support throughout this entire process have meant so much to me. I dedicate this project to my Mom especially; I must acknowledge that nearly every good thing I know and good decision I’ve made is because of her. She has (literally and figuratively) pushed me to achieve this dream. Mom has been my rock, my wall to lean upon, every single day. I love you, Mom. Tom, Michael, and Lisa have been the best siblings and sister-in-law. Tom thinks what I do is cool, and that means the world to a little sister.
  • On the Months (De Mensibus) (Lewiston, 2013)

    On the Months (De Mensibus) (Lewiston, 2013)

    John Lydus On the Months (De mensibus) Translated with introduction and annotations by Mischa Hooker 2nd edition (2017) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations .......................................................................................... iv Introduction .............................................................................................. v On the Months: Book 1 ............................................................................... 1 On the Months: Book 2 ............................................................................ 17 On the Months: Book 3 ............................................................................ 33 On the Months: Book 4 January ......................................................................................... 55 February ....................................................................................... 76 March ............................................................................................. 85 April ............................................................................................ 109 May ............................................................................................. 123 June ............................................................................................ 134 July ............................................................................................. 140 August ........................................................................................ 147 September ................................................................................
  • Calendar of Roman Events

    Calendar of Roman Events

    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
  • Post Scriptum: a Number of Observations, with Hindsight

    Post Scriptum: a Number of Observations, with Hindsight

    Post Scriptum: A Number of Observations, with Hindsight Astronomia Etrusco-Romana was first published in Italian in 2003, following Astronomy and Calendar in Ancient Rome—The Eclipse Festivals in 2001, and Le Feste di Venere—Fertilità femminile e configurazioni astrali nel calendario di Roma antica in 1996. In nigh on a decade of ‘‘crazy, desperate’’ study, as Giacomo Leopardi would have it, I have reconstructed a solid framework of the Roman calendar’s astronomical underpinnings, especially the Numan calendar. Stars, Myths and Rituals in Etruscan Rome makes only minimal adjustments to this framework, as well as adding some interesting elements to the fray. Over this time—and at long last—there has been a radical change in our understanding of man’s relationship with the heavens during the time of Rome’s early kings. The eighth century BCE calendars that have survived the centuries are no longer viewed as the basic calendars of an agricultural and pastoral society, lacking in any consideration for heavenly phenomena or the movements of heavenly bodies; calendar feast days are no longer considered simple anniversaries of natural events, such as storing away grain or lambing time. On the contrary, the Romulean calendar demonstrates an awareness of a number of significant celestial phenomena, while the Numan calendar and cycle are a highly advanced—indeed, close to perfect—mechanism for monitoring observable movements in the solar system. The end result of this research is a demonstration not just that Romans in Augustus’ day were mistaken in their belief—asserted time and time again by Ovid, our best witness1—that Romans were uninterested in and had no understanding of astronomy.
  • A Roman Cult in the Italian Countryside? the Compitalia and the Shrines of the Lares Compitales

    A Roman Cult in the Italian Countryside? the Compitalia and the Shrines of the Lares Compitales

    0821-07_Babesch_83_08 23-09-2008 16:06 Pagina 111 BABESCH 83 (2008), 111-132. doi: 10.2143/BAB.83.0.2033102. A Roman cult in the Italian countryside? The Compitalia and the shrines of the Lares Compitales T.D. Stek Abstract The Roman religious festival of the Compitalia (‘cross-roads festival’) was celebrated in both city and coun- tryside. It is generally assumed that it originated as a rural cult which was later incorporated in the city, where it became the principal festival of the vici or urban quarters. In this paper it will be argued that the spread of the Compitalia might have been in the opposite direction; in this view the Compitalia, a Roman urban festi- val with administrative aspects, was spread outside Rome alongside Roman influence. It is not known where the Compitalia were celebrated in the countryside. It will be suggested that ancient ‘Italic’ sanctuaries have been re-used for celebrating the Roman rite of the Compitalia, apparently by now functioning within a Roman administrative and religious system.* the separation between city cult and family or farm cult should not be exaggerated (Beard/North/Price 1998, 50) INTRODUCTION. THE COMPITALIA: A PARADOXICAL both to what we would define the ‘private’ and PICTURE to the ‘public’ domain. Another paradoxical aspect regards the location At the end of a letter to Atticus (2.3), Cicero of the Compitalia. The festival is often associated writes, probably from his country house, after with the urban plebs, and therefore placed in an having referred to the political situation in Rome urban setting.
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Funerary Ritual and Urban Development in Archaic Central Italy Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5w54r8pb Author Evans, Jennifer Marilyn Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Funerary Ritual and Urban Development in Archaic Central Italy By Jennifer Marilyn Evans A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classical Archaeology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor J. Theodore Peña, Chair Professor Christopher Hallett Professor Dylan Sailor Professor Nicola Terrenato Professor Carlos Noreña Spring 2014 Copyright 2014, Jennifer Marilyn Evans Abstract Funerary Ritual and Urban Development in Archaic Central Italy by Jennifer Marilyn Evans Doctor of Philosophy in Classical Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Professor J. Theodore Peña, Chair This dissertation examines the evidence for burial in archaic Rome and Latium with a view to understanding the nature of urban development in the region. In particular, I focus on identifying those social and political institutions that governed relations between city‐ states at a time when Rome was becoming the most influential urban center in the area. I examine the evidence for burial gathered primarily from the past four decades or so of archaeological excavation in order to present first, a systematic account of the data and second, an analysis of these materials. I reveal that a high degree of variation was observed in funerary ritual across sites, and suggest that this points to a complex system of regional networks that allowed for the widespread travel of people and ideas.
  • The Lives of the Caesars

    The Lives of the Caesars

    The Lives of the Caesars Suetonius The Lives of the Caesars Table of Contents The Lives of the Caesars...........................................................................................................................................1 Suetonius........................................................................................................................................................2 The Lives of the Caesars, The Deified Julius................................................................................................3 The Lives of the Caesars—The Deified Augustus.......................................................................................23 The Lives of the Caesars—Tiberius.............................................................................................................53 The Lives of the Caesars: Caius Caligula....................................................................................................72 The Lives of the Caesars: Claudius..............................................................................................................89 The Lives of the Caesars: Nero..................................................................................................................105 The Lives of the Caesars: Galba................................................................................................................124 The Lives of the Caesars: Otho..................................................................................................................131
  • Ancient Roman Munificence: the Development of the Practice and Law of Charity

    Ancient Roman Munificence: the Development of the Practice and Law of Charity

    Texas A&M University School of Law Texas A&M Law Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 3-2004 Ancient Roman Munificence: The Development of the Practice and Law of Charity William H. Byrnes IV Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation William H. Byrnes IV, Ancient Roman Munificence: The Development of the Practice and Law of Charity, 57 Rutgers L. Rev. 1043 (2004). Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/421 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANCIENT ROMAN MUNIFICENCE: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRACTICE AND LAW OF CHARITY William H. Byrnes, IV* INTRODUCTION This article traces Roman charity from its incipient meager beginnings during Rome's infancy to the mature legal formula it assumed after intersecting with the Roman emperors and Christianity. During this evolution, charity went from being a haphazard and often accidental private event to a broad undertaking of public, religious, and legal commitment. To mention the obvious, Rome was the greatest and most influential empire in the ancient world. It lasted more than a thousand years, traditionally beginning in 753 B.C. as a kingdom under Romulus.' In 509 B.C. it became a republic with permanent tyranny beginning in 31 B.C. under direction of the immortal Julius Caesar.2 The exact date of the end of * Professor and Director, Walter H.
  • I Introduction

    I Introduction

    I INTRODUCTION Angelos Chaniotis - 9789047428275 Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/2021 09:44:43AM via free access THE DYNAMICS OF RITUALS IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE Angelos Chaniotis 1. Ritual Displacement The Roman envoys sent to settle affairs in the East after Rome‟s victory over Macedonia in 167 BC must have been shocked at the spectacle that awaited them in Nikomedeia, the capital of the kingdom of Bithynia.1 They expected to meet Prusias, king of Bithynia, a friend and ally of the Roman people. But the man who appeared in front of them had his head shaved and was wearing the attire of a Roman freedman: a white cap, toga, and boots. The king, in this „theatrical costume‟ (δηαζθεπή), stretched out his right hand to the envoys and greeted them with the words: “Behold your freedman, who is willing to endear himself to you and emulate all your customs.” Polybius, our source, describes another bizarre scene with the same protagonist, this time in Rome: When he came to the entrance that leads to the senate, he stood at the little door facing the council and, lowering both his hands to the ground, he prostrated himself in front of the threshold and those who were seated and exclaimed: „hail, you saviour gods!‟ In Nikomedeia, Prusias performed a Roman social ritual, in Rome a Greek religious one: lying entirely flat on the ground in front of a divinity, a practice known both from literary sources and from iconography.2 The ritual of πξνζθπλεῖλ or γνλππεηεῖλ, primarily attested in connection with saviour gods, was often associated with supplication and primarily performed by women.