Building Envelope • Sustainability Consulting
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Read Where Architecture Expert Paul Goldberg Comments on the History of New York's Famous Skyscrapers. As You Do So, Complete
Can you identify any of these buildings? What do they all have in common? Which one do you like best? Read where architecture expert Paul Goldberg comments on the history of New York’s famous skyscrapers. As you do so, complete the following tasks: · In New York buildings are not only buildings, they become ___________________ · New York took over Chicago as regards skyscrapers in ___________________. · The Woolworth building was the tallest building worldwide for _________________. · The _______________ defined the Manhattan skyline. · They are trying to keep a memory of the people who were lost and also to show New York’s ______________________________. · New York stands out from the other cities as the embodiment of ____________________. Woolworth Building; Empire State Building; Chrysler Building; Flatiron; Hearst Tower The Woolworth Building, at 57 stories (floors), is one of the oldest—and one of the most famous—skyscrapers in New York City. It was the world’s tallest building for 17 years. More than 95 years after its construction, it is still one of the fifty tallest buildings in the United States as well as one of the twenty tallest buildings in New York City. The building is a National Historic Landmark, having been listed in 1966. The Empire State Building is a 102-story landmark Art Deco skyscraper in New York City at the intersection of Fifth Avenue and West 34th Street. Like many New York building, it has become seen as a work of art. Its name is derived from the nickname for New York, The Empire State. It stood as the world's tallest building for more than 40 years, from its completion in 1931 until construction of the World Trade Center's North Tower was completed in 1972. -
Return of Private Foundation
OMB No 1545.0052 Form 990 P F Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust Treated as a Private Foundation 2007 Department of the Treasury Note : The foundation may be able to use a copy of this return to satisfy state Internal Revenue Service For calendar year 2007, or tax year be ginnin g , 2007 , and endin g I G Check all that apply Initial return Final return Amended return Address change Name change Name of foundation A Employer identification number Use the IRS label THE MANN FOUNDATION INC 32-0149835 Otherwise , Number and street (or P 0 box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number (see the instructions) print or type 1385 BROADWAY 1 1102 (212) 840-6266 See Specific City or town State ZIP code C If exemption application is pending, check here Instructions. ► NEW YORK NY 1 0 0 1 8 D 1 Foreign organizations , check here ► H Check type of organization Section 501 (c)(3exempt private foundation 2 Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, check q here and attach computation Section 4947(a ) (1) nonexem p t charitable trust Other taxable p rivate foundation ► foundation status was terminated Accrual E If private ► Fair market value of all assets at end of year J Accounting method Cash X under section 507(b)(1 XA), check here (from Part ll, column (c), line 16) Other (s pecify) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination (d) on cash basis) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here ► $ -2,064. -
Pittsfield Building 55 E
LANDMARK DESIGNATION REPORT Pittsfield Building 55 E. Washington Preliminary Landmarkrecommendation approved by the Commission on Chicago Landmarks, December 12, 2001 CITY OFCHICAGO Richard M. Daley, Mayor Departmentof Planning and Developement Alicia Mazur Berg, Commissioner Cover: On the right, the Pittsfield Building, as seen from Michigan Avenue, looking west. The Pittsfield Building's trademark is its interior lobbies and atrium, seen in the upper and lower left. In the center, an advertisement announcing the building's construction and leasing, c. 1927. Above: The Pittsfield Building, located at 55 E. Washington Street, is a 38-story steel-frame skyscraper with a rectangular 21-story base that covers the entire building lot-approximately 162 feet on Washington Street and 120 feet on Wabash Avenue. The Commission on Chicago Landmarks, whose nine members are appointed by the Mayor, was established in 1968 by city ordinance. It is responsible for recommending to the City Council that individual buildings, sites, objects, or entire districts be designated as Chicago Landmarks, which protects them by law. The Comm ission is staffed by the Chicago Department of Planning and Development, 33 N. LaSalle St., Room 1600, Chicago, IL 60602; (312-744-3200) phone; (312 744-2958) TTY; (312-744-9 140) fax; web site, http ://www.cityofchicago.org/ landmarks. This Preliminary Summary ofInformation is subject to possible revision and amendment during the designation proceedings. Only language contained within the designation ordinance adopted by the City Council should be regarded as final. PRELIMINARY SUMMARY OF INFORMATION SUBMITIED TO THE COMMISSION ON CHICAGO LANDMARKS IN DECEMBER 2001 PITTSFIELD BUILDING 55 E. -
Order Forms Kit New York Comic Con October (5-8) 2017
Order Forms Kit New York Comic Con October (5-8) 2017 In order to service you better, please PRINT and use BLACK INK when filling out your order forms. You will find included: Javits Utilities Order Forms: Advance Rate Deadline: September 14, 2017 Attention Notice, Service Order Payment, Floor Plan Layout, Lighting Fixture Choices, Electrical, Cleaning, Plumbing and Telecommunications/In-Booth Camera Centerplate: Welcome Notice & Service Links, Catering Order Form FedEx: Welcome Notices & Services, Conference Rooms & Work Station Rental. American Express Open: Welcome Notices & Services, Applications, Office Location SuperShuttle / Golden Touch Information: Airport Transportation, website information, Discount information Special Notice: Shipping Freight information Attention Exhibitors Electrical Service Installation Notice Pre‐ordering your services can save you time and money. Once you’re on‐site, please be sure to check in with the Javits electrical foreman when you are ready for installation of your electrical services. It’s a good idea to have a copy of your Service Order form and proof of “sent confirmation” with you. Most electrical foremen are located within the Exhibit Hall in the front of the aisle near the restrooms. Information of location on Crystal Palace and all Concourse Level electrical foremen is available at the Service Center. If you have questions or require assistance with installation, please call Electrical Services 212 216‐2655 Javits In-Booth Video System Stay connected to your booth and business with Javits’ latest service. The Javits Center’s in-booth video system provides live-stream footage of your booth-enabling you to assess sales activity, product placement, etc. The discrete camera design works seamlessly into your booth, virtually unnoticed-the corresponding app gives you 24-hour access to booth activity at your fingertips. -
RITZ TOWER, 465 Park Avenue (Aka 461-465 Park Avenue, and 101East5t11 Street), Manhattan
Landmarks Preservation Commission October 29, 2002, Designation List 340 LP-2118 RITZ TOWER, 465 Park Avenue (aka 461-465 Park Avenue, and 101East5T11 Street), Manhattan. Built 1925-27; Emery Roth, architect, with Thomas Hastings. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1312, Lot 70. On July 16, 2002 the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Ritz Tower, and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No.2). The hearing had been advertised in accordance with provisions of law. Ross Moscowitz, representing the owners of the cooperative spoke in opposition to designation. At the time of designation, he took no position. Mark Levine, from the Jamestown Group, representing the owners of the commercial space, took no position on designation at the public hearing. Bill Higgins represented these owners at the time of designation and spoke in favor. Three witnesses testified in favor of designation, including representatives of State Senator Liz Kruger, the Landmarks Conservancy and the Historic Districts Council. In addition, the Commission has received letters in support of designation from Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney, from Community Board Five, and from architectural hi storian, John Kriskiewicz. There was also one letter from a building resident opposed to designation. Summary The Ritz Tower Apartment Hotel was constructed in 1925 at the premier crossroads of New York's Upper East Side, the comer of 57t11 Street and Park A venue, where the exclusive shops and artistic enterprises of 57t11 Street met apartment buildings of ever-increasing height and luxury on Park Avenue. -
Seagram Building, First Floor Interior
I.andmarks Preservation Commission october 3, 1989; Designation List 221 IP-1665 SEAGRAM BUIIDING, FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR consisting of the lobby and passenger elevator cabs and the fixtures and interior components of these spaces including but not limited to, interior piers, wall surfaces, ceiling surfaces, floor surfaces, doors, railings, elevator doors, elevator indicators, and signs; 375 Park Avenue, Manhattan. Designed by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe with Philip Johnson; Kahn & Jacobs, associate architects. Built 1956-58. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1307, Lot 1. On May 17, 1988, the landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Seagram Building, first floor interior, consisting of the lobby and passenger elevator cabs and the fixtures and interior components of these spaces including but not limited to, interior piers, wall surfaces, ceiling surfaces, floor surfaces, doors, railings, elevator doors, elevator indicators, and signs; and the proposed designation of the related I.and.mark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Twenty witnesses, including a representative of the building's owner, spoke in favor of designation. No witnesses spoke in opposition to designation. The Commission has received many letters in favor of designation. DFSCRIPI'ION AND ANALYSIS Summary The Seagram Building, erected in 1956-58, is the only building in New York City designed by architectural master Iudwig Mies van der Rohe. Constructed on Park Avenue at a time when it was changing from an exclusive residential thoroughfare to a prestigious business address, the Seagram Building embodies the quest of a successful corporation to establish further its public image through architectural patronage. -
No. 13-3148 in the UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS for THE
Case: 13-3148 Document: 20-2 Filed: 01/10/2014 Pages: 43 No. 13-3148 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT INTERCON SOLUTIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BASEL ACTION NETWORK AND JAMES PUCKETT, Defendants-Appellants. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case No. 12-CV-6814 (Hon. Virginia M. Kendall) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INC., ALLIED DAILY NEWSPAPERS OF WASHINGTON, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEWS EDITORS, ASSOCIATION OF ALTERNATIVE NEWSMEDIA, THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PUBLISHERS, INC., BLOOMBERG L.P., CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC., THE E.W. SCRIPPS COMPANY, HEARST CORPORATION, THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY, MEDIA LAW RESOURCE CENTER, THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB, NATIONAL PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC., NEWS CORPORATION, NEWSPAPER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, ONLINE NEWS ASSOCIATION, PRO PUBLICA, INC., RADIO TELEVISION DIGITAL NEWS ASSOCIATION, REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, SEATTLE TIMES COMPANY, SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS, TIME INC., TRIBUNE COMPANY, THE WASHINGTON NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION, AND THE WASHINGTON POST IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND REVERSAL _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Bruce E. H. Johnson Laura R. Handman Ambika K. Doran Alison Schary DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Seattle, WA 98101 Suite 800 (206) 622-3150 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 973-4200 Thomas R. Burke DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Counsel for Amici Curiae 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94111 (*Of counsel listed on inside cover) (415) 276-6500 Case: 13-3148 Document: 20-2 Filed: 01/10/2014 Pages: 43 OF COUNSEL Richard A. -
Leseprobe 9783791384900.Pdf
NYC Walks — Guide to New Architecture JOHN HILL PHOTOGRAPHY BY PAVEL BENDOV Prestel Munich — London — New York BRONX 7 Columbia University and Barnard College 6 Columbus Circle QUEENS to Lincoln Center 5 57th Street, 10 River to River East River MANHATTAN by Ferry 3 High Line and Its Environs 4 Bowery Changing 2 West Side Living 8 Brooklyn 9 1 Bridge Park Car-free G Train Tour Lower Manhattan of Brooklyn BROOKLYN Contents 16 Introduction 21 1. Car-free Lower Manhattan 49 2. West Side Living 69 3. High Line and Its Environs 91 4. Bowery Changing 109 5. 57th Street, River to River QUEENS 125 6. Columbus Circle to Lincoln Center 143 7. Columbia University and Barnard College 161 8. Brooklyn Bridge Park 177 9. G Train Tour of Brooklyn 195 10. East River by Ferry 211 20 More Places to See 217 Acknowledgments BROOKLYN 2 West Side Living 2.75 MILES / 4.4 KM This tour starts at the southwest corner of Leonard and Church Streets in Tribeca and ends in the West Village overlooking a remnant of the elevated railway that was transformed into the High Line. Early last century, industrial piers stretched up the Hudson River from the Battery to the Upper West Side. Most respectable New Yorkers shied away from the working waterfront and therefore lived toward the middle of the island. But in today’s postindustrial Manhattan, the West Side is a highly desirable—and expensive— place, home to residential developments catering to the well-to-do who want to live close to the waterfront and its now recreational piers. -
I I I Case 13-13086-KG Doc 1 Filed 11/22/13 Page 1 of 4
B! (Official Form 11 (12/11) Case 13-13086-KG Doc 1 Filed 11/22/13 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT District of Delaware YOLIJ1"4T4RYPET1TION - Name of Debtor (if individual, enter Last, First, Middle): Name of Joint Debtor (Spouse) (Last, First, Middle): Fisker_ Automotive, _Inc. All Other Names used by the Debtor in the last 8 years All Other Names used by the Joint Debtor in the last 8 years (include married, maiden, and trade names): (include married, maiden, and trade names): Last four digits of Soc. Sec. or Individual-Taxpayer I.D. (ITIN)/Complete Eli') Last four digits of Soc. Sec. or individual-Taxpayer I.D. (ITIN)/Complete EIN (if more than one, state all): (if more than one, state all): 26-0689075 Street Address of Debtor (No. and Street, City, and State): Street Address of Joint Debtor (No. and Street, City, and State): 5515 E. La Palma Ave. Anaheim, California IZIP CODE 92807 I VIP CODE I County of Residence or of the Principal Place of Business: County of Residence or of the Principal Place of Business: Orange County Mailing Address of Debtor (if different from street address): Mailing Address of Joint Debtor (if different from street address): IZIP CODE I IZIP CODE I Location of Principal Assets of Business Debtor (if different from street address above): IZIP CODE I Type of Debtor Nature of Business Chapter of Bankruptcy Code Under Which (Form of Organization) (Check one box.) the Petition is Filed (Check one box.) (Check one box.) El Health Care Business D Chapter 7 0 Chapter 15 Petition for 0 Individual (includes Joint Debtors) 0 Single Asset Real Estate as defined in 0 Chapter 9 Recognition of a Foreign See Exhibit Don page 2 of thisform. -
NYC Bird Friendly Building Design and Construction Requirements
Bird Friendly Building Design & Construction Requirements Guidance document LOCAL LAW 15 OF 2020 NOVEMBER 2020 ● VERSION 1.0 BACKGROUND The Bird Friendly Building Design and Construction Requirements Guidance Document provides useful terms and associated commentary, elaborates on design and construction requirements as it applies to bird hazard installations and provides figures, pictures and commentary to assist the designer, building owner and glazing manufacturer in understanding where bird friendly materials are required to be installed, how to verify a threat factor for a glazing assembly as well as how to obtain a threat factor for an assembly that has not yet been evaluated. This Guidance Document was developed through a collaborative approach between the department and members of the design, manufacturing, development and bird conservancy community. I. INTRODUCTION The New York City Council adopted Local Law 15 of 2020, which requires that materials that reduce bird strike fatalities be installed on newly constructed or altered buildings. The Local Law, effective January 10, 2021,amends the New York City Administrative Code (AC) and the New York City Building Code (BC) to mandate the use of bird friendly materials in exterior walls, balconies, parapets, and other similar locations. Projects filed on or after January 10, 2021, will be required to use bird-friendly materials in all new buildings, and where alterations of buildings include the replacement of all exterior glazing. Local Law 15 of 2020 also requires that DOB post on its website requirements and information about compliance with NYC Building Code Section 1403.8 regarding the use of bird friendly building design and construction materials. -
Hearst Tower Makes Dramatic Use of Light & Space
Inside & out, Hearst Tower makes dramatic use of light & space. Welcome to Hearst Tower, Hearst’s global headquarters and the first New York City st landmark of the 21 century. Using the original 1928 Hearst International Magazine Building as his pedestal, noted British architect Norman Foster has conceived an arresting 46-story glass-and-steel skyscraper that establishes a number of design and environmental milestones. Hearst Tower is a true pioneer in environmental sustain- ABOUT HEARST ability, having been declared the first “green” Hearst Tower is home to employees office building in New York City history. of Hearst, one of the largest Inside and out, the design of Hearst Tower diversified media, information and makes dramatic use of light and space. The soar- services companies. Its major inter- ing three-story atrium—filled with the sound of ests span close to 300 magazines cascading water—creates a sense of calm on a around the world, including Cosmo- grand scale. The exterior honeycomb of steel politan, ELLE and O, The Oprah Mag- keeps the interior work areas uncluttered by azine; respected daily newspapers, pillars and walls, thus creating superb views of including the Houston Chronicle and the city from most vantages on the work floor. San Francisco Chronicle; television At night, with its radically angled panes of glass, stations around the country that Hearst Tower looks like a faceted jewel. reach approximately 19 percent of U.S. TV households; ownership in leading cable networks, including Lifetime, A&E, HISTORY and ESPN; as well as business information, digital services businesses and investments in emerging digital and video companies. -
Structural Developments in Tall Buildings: Current Trends and Future Prospects
© 2007 University of Sydney. All rights reserved. Architectural Science Review www.arch.usyd.edu.au/asr Volume 50.3, pp 205-223 Invited Review Paper Structural Developments in Tall Buildings: Current Trends and Future Prospects Mir M. Ali† and Kyoung Sun Moon Structures Division, School of Architecture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA †Corresponding Author: Tel: + 1 217 333 1330; Fax: +1 217 244 2900; E-mail: [email protected] Received 8 May; accepted 13 June 2007 Abstract: Tall building developments have been rapidly increasing worldwide. This paper reviews the evolution of tall building’s structural systems and the technological driving force behind tall building developments. For the primary structural systems, a new classification – interior structures and exterior structures – is presented. While most representative structural systems for tall buildings are discussed, the emphasis in this review paper is on current trends such as outrigger systems and diagrid structures. Auxiliary damping systems controlling building motion are also discussed. Further, contemporary “out-of-the-box” architectural design trends, such as aerodynamic and twisted forms, which directly or indirectly affect the structural performance of tall buildings, are reviewed. Finally, the future of structural developments in tall buildings is envisioned briefly. Keywords: Aerodynamics, Building forms, Damping systems, Diagrid structures, Exterior structures, Interior structures, Outrigger systems, Structural performance, Structural systems, Tall buildings Introduction Tall buildings emerged in the late nineteenth century in revolution – the steel skeletal structure – as well as consequent the United States of America. They constituted a so-called glass curtain wall systems, which occurred in Chicago, has led to “American Building Type,” meaning that most important tall the present state-of-the-art skyscraper.