DOCSLIB.ORG

Hybrid Design-To-Build: Fusing Two Cultures of Makers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hybrid Design-To-Build: Fusing Two Cultures of Makers Hybrid Design-to-Build: Fusing Two Cultures of Makers A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Architecture School of Architecture and Interior Design College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning 2017 Thomas Covert Bachelor of Science in Architectural Engineering Technology College of Engineering and Applied Science University of Cincinnati April 2014 Committee Chair: Elizabeth Riorden, M.Arch Committee Member: Udo Greinacher, M.Arch ABSTRACT This thesis proposal investigates the shortcomings between the craft, the making, and the building within the architectural design process and promotes the possibilities of a more simultaneous approach to making architecture. The outcome will be the evocation of a skillset such as that of a hybrid between architect and builder, and will study and analyze the impacts of the proposed process on a specific project and the community in which it resides. The argument will be for a more synchronized approach when producing architecture and will attempt to curtail the amount of “copy and paste” drafting, and coordinating, while integrating the actual – the tectonic building, the innovative making, and the embodied craft that is so sequential and arguably nonexistent within today’s typical architectural practice. The methodology within the architectural practice is inherently flawed, specifically related to the lack of control and understanding related to construction. There is an obvious disconnect between the entities of the builder and the architect. As a result, architects typically rely on books of graphic standard details, digital libraries of detail components, and 3D building information modeling software to convey their now “standard” intent. This linear process enables habits of “copy/paste” architecture resulting in standard buildings with standard detailing- no uniqueness, no response to context, just a homogeneous state of basic repetition no matter where the demand lies. By integrating explorations of building, craft, and “making” into the design process, one can argue the positive effects that it will have on the design, the architect, the builder, and the community. TABLE OF CONTENTS IMAGE CREDITS INTRODUCTION 01 IMAGE 01 By Author HYPOTHESIS 08 IMAGE 02 Kieran, S. & Timberlake, J. (2004). Managing Intelligence. Refabricating Architecture: How Manufacturing Methodologies THE GAP BETWEEN ARCHITECT & BUILDER 09 are Poised to Transform Building Construction. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. 22. EDUCATION 12 IMAGE 03 By Author THE PRODUCTION BASED DESIGN PROCESS 15 IMAGE 04 By Author THE IDEATION BASED DESIGN PROCESS 22 IMAGE 05 Ford assembly line, 1913. Accessed March 17,2017. https:// THE HYBRID DESIGN-BUILD PROCESS 25 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_production RECONNECTING TO LOCAL TRADES 31 IMAGE 06 Traditional Design- Bid-Build. Accessed March 17, 2017. http:// www.architectmasterbuilder.com/advantages.html. VERNACULAR ARCHITECTURE & REGIONALISM 36 IMAGE 07 By Author THE PROJECT 38 IMAGE 08 Architect-Led Design-Build. Accessed March 17, 2017. http:// SITE SELECTION & ANALYSIS 41 www.architectmasterbuilder.com/advantages.html. TYPOLOGY & PROGRAM 45 IMAGE 09 By Author CONSTRUCTION METHOD AS A DRIVER 49 IMAGE 10 By Author COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 53 PROJECT By Author IMAGES THE PROJECT OUTCOME 55 (PP 39-62) GLOSSARY 63 BIBLIOGRAPHY 66 INTRODUCTION IMAGE 01 - Diagram illustrating the two extremes within the architectural design process, linear and sequential typical production based process to the design through making & experimentation based process 03 04 There exists a problem regarding the relationship between the intent of architectural “Why is the architect not more of a part in the construction process? …Can the excitement of building, the drawings and the way they are comprehended. For example, this problem includes the builders themselves, and the construction site become part of the education process and, inevitably, the practice of transition from a drawing to a building, the lines on the paper being representational but not an architect? How can a didactic practice that resides, as two so separate parts for nearly 1500 years be more 2 always accurate, the unclear graphical communication, and most importantly the enormous complementary?” amount of time that is lost when explaining the often-misunderstood assemblies. There is a Innovation typically does not happen in the architectural capacities, but is often put in the general perception that the architect has seldom tested the drawing and lacks the knowledge hands of product engineers or consultants, contractors, or craftspeople miles away, disconnected of construction; their understanding of the physical makeup is lost. On the other end, the from the very minds that conceive it. Bob Sheil, of the Bartlett School, states that architectural contractor misunderstands the intent; the lines are representational but not true, nor accurate. As design does not end as the tools of fabrication are put into action. Making is a discipline that can a result, complications include the notion that builders do not understand drawings. There is a investigate rather than merely solve ideas; in other words, a design process. 3 misrepresentation demonstrated by the architect, the intent is lost due to this misunderstanding, Similarly, David Pye states that design of any kind is a matter of trial and error. There are and because of the architect’s lack of knowledge in assembly, builders are responsible for always some trial assumptions which no calculation or drawing can verify. Evidence of this theory conveying the intent based on what they are familiar with, not what is intended. There is a was apparent last summer when a classmate and I designed a conference table off a mere sketch, perception that an architect’s inability to relate to the very hands that are responsible in carrying not knowing the limitations of the materials until tested. The tests became the process. 4 out the design results in a disconnect between the design of the space and skill-set of the craftsperson. The embodiment of craft and its articulation is lost in the translation, or worse Through the often improperly executed architectural intent, there are apparent failures in never conceived. A potential solution for combating this problem would be to increase the level the built environment, specifically the materials interacting with other materials and the logic of of understanding related to construction, its methods, and techniques as a means of design. assembly. Is this the fault of the designer or builder? My own educational experience reveals a This is not an argument to prove or deny any certain established design method of practice, but harsh divide between architect and builder. With a back ground as a residential builder, eventually simply an effort to create mindfulness of the impacts and possibilities of design happening within transitioning to engineering school to study architectural engineering technology, and currently the craft and building process. These often-practiced habits disregard the realities of material, concentrating on architecture while pursuing Master of Architecture, the inevitable ideologies of assembly, and their limitations. This results in a lack of innovation, creativity, and embodied craft. my past are hard to deny. In the past, I encountered the opinion that the architect does not know “Construction sites reveal the way a building is made. The life of a structure is marked when the materials are what they are drawing, however now I hear architects stating that the builders do not know how stacked, when some order is assembled amid the chaos of activity at a site. Building sites are intriguing because to interpret what has been drawn. The literal sense that was so much a part of my life cannot of their potential; the materials could become anything.” 1 be ignored and should not be, even though now I find myself among the architectural world of abstraction and sometimes fantasy. This means of making architecture is often praised and very Construction can often be the designer’s most exciting moment, a design that was on paper much should be, to inspire although knowing that some of these proposals are so far from reality coming to life, a figure that was once an imagination now able to give presence, but as designers that it is lost in all the algorithmic and parametric provocative volumes that make up the intrigue we are not part of this process, in fact we are expected to make essential decisions through emails or phone calls. 2 Carpenter, W. (1997). Learning by Building: Design Construction in Architecture Education. New York. Van Norstrand Reinhold. 14 1 Carpenter, W. (1997). Learning by Building: Design Construction in Architecture Education. New York. Van 3 Sheil, R. (2005). Design through Making. Great Britain. 8-11 Norstrand Reinhold. 107 4 Pye, D. The Nature and Aesthetics of Design. (1978). London. Herbert Press. 90-96 05 06 that infatuate us. Although very grateful to be a part of the digital parametric age, I see it as lead construction and the impacts that it could have on empowering a community. removed from making, constructing, and producing architecture of evident human qualities that can be spiritual and cultural symbols. I must ask myself is this how I want to practice? – shall I ignore the years prior to architectural school and ignore the realities and constraints of the built HYPOTHESIS actualities that were
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alternative Contracting Methods
    ALTERNATIVE CONTRACTING METHODS • Conventional Design-Bid-Build • Design/Build • Negotiated General Contractor By Jeff Warner, AIA, LEED AP Principal, ALSC Architects CONVENTIONAL DESIGN-BID-BUILD The most traditional method of delivery of a construction PROS project is where the Architect, after selection by the Client, 1. Costs may be lower due to competition. totally completes the design documents which are then 2. Project design is typically complete prior to start of distributed to General Contractors for bidding. Usually, the construction. low bidder is selected to construct the project and enters 3. Owner receives a single lump sum proposal for the entire into a lump sum type contract agreement directly with the project not subject to cost escalation. Owner. During construction, the Architect typically maintains 4. This approach conforms most directly to public bidding a strong administrative role and is the focal point of most laws. communication on the project between the Contractor and Owner. While proponents of this method of contracting feel that CONS the lowest overall initial costs are obtained through pure 1. If bids exceed budget, the project may require re-design. competitive bidding, an adversarial relationship between 2. Difficult to fast-track or pre-order materials, resulting in principal parties can develop; making the administration of later Owner occupancy. changes more difficult, time consuming and costly. Perhaps 3. The General Contractor may be in an adversarial the biggest potential problem with this approach to a major, relationship with the Owner and Architect/Engineer. complex construction project is that the Owner does not 4. Prices for change order work are typically higher and obtain a firm handle on construction costs until the project has more difficult to control.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Engineer Vs Architect- Differents in Job, Salary
    Civil engineer vs Architect- Differents in Job, Salary If you are a civil engineer or an architectural engineer then I think I need not describe about Civil engineer vs Architect to you. Right?. You should already have some knowledge about them. Don’t you? Not to worry even you don’t know, I am here to explain it to you. But, if you are choosing to be graduate among civil engineering and architectural engineering, then you are at the right place to know “Civil engineer vs Architect” In any construction work or creation of structure like a bridge, building, airport, etc there require good knowledge and understanding of civil and architecture engineers. The skill of both professions is most required for the aesthetic and stable structure to be made. If the structure is attractive in look but not safe for landing or using, then there is no point in constructing a structure or if the structure is safe but not well manage for efficient work then also there is no point in constructing the structure. So, in short, you can understand the work of an architectural engineer is to manage and give an aesthetic look to the structure and the work of a civil engineer is to analyze and make a safe structure. However, there are some considerable differences between Civil engineer vs Architect. Let us discuss this. Civil engineer vs Architect S.N Architecture Engineer Civil Engineer Architecture engineers initialize the construction through their design. The After that the remaining designing of structure for 1 work for civil engineers aesthetic purpose means to give to proceed.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Building Delivery Process
    An Overview of the Building Delivery CHAPTER Process 1 (How Buildings Come into Being) CHAPTER OUTLINE 1.1 PROJECT DELIVERY PHASES 1.11 CONSTRUCTION PHASE: CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION 1.2 PREDESIGN PHASE 1.12 POSTCONSTRUCTION PHASE: 1.3 DESIGN PHASE PROJECT CLOSEOUT 1.4 THREE SEQUENTIAL STAGES IN DESIGN PHASE 1.13 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD: DESIGN- BID-BUILD METHOD 1.5 CSI MASTERFORMAT AND SPECIFICATIONS 1.14 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD: 1.6 THE CONSTRUCTION TEAM DESIGN-­NEGOTIATE-BUILD METHOD 1.7 PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE: THE BIDDING 1.15 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS MANAGEMENT-RELATED METHODS 1.8 PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE: THE SURETY BONDS 1.16 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD: DESIGN-BUILD METHOD 1.9 PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE: SELECTING THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND PROJECT 1.17 INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD DELIVERY 1.18 FAST-TRACK PROJECT SCHEDULING 1.10 CONSTRUCTION PHASE: SUBMITTALS AND CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS DOCUMENTATION Building construction is a complex, significant, and rewarding process. It begins with an idea and culminates in a structure that may serve its occupants for several decades, even centuries. Like the manufacturing of products, building construction requires an ordered and planned assembly of materials. It is, however, far more complicated than product manufacturing. Buildings are assembled outdoors by a large number of diverse constructors and artisans on all types of sites and are subject to all kinds of weather conditions. Additionally, even a modest-sized building must satisfy many performance criteria and legal constraints, requires an immense variety of materials, and involves a large network of design and production firms. Building construction is further complicated by the fact that no two buildings are identical; each one must be custom built to serve a unique function and respond to its specific context and the preferences of its owner, user, and occupant.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Design Authority
    BUILDING DESIGN AUTHORITY Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors 2535 Capitol Oaks Drive, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95833 1-866-780-5370 www.bpelsg.ca.gov [email protected] STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS may design any building of any type. CIVIL ENGINEERS may design any building of any type EXCEPT public schools and hospitals. ARCHITECTS may design any building of any type EXCEPT the structural portion of a hospital. UNLICENSED INDIVIDUALS may design only the following types of buildings: Single-family dwellings of not more than two stories and basement in height. Multiple dwellings containing not more than four dwelling units of woodframe construction of not more than two stories and basement in height and no more than four dwelling units per lot. Garages or other structures appurtenant to the dwellings described above of woodframe construction not more than two stories and basement in height. NOTE: If any portion of the structures described above does not meet the conventional woodframe requirements described in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations or in the building codes of the local jurisdiction, then the building official having jurisdiction shall require the plans, calculations, and specifications for that portion of the structure to be prepared and signed and sealed by a licensed engineer or a licensed architect. Agricultural and ranch buildings of wood frame construction, unless the building official having jurisdiction determines that an undue risk to the public health, safety, or welfare is involved. Store fronts, interior alterations or additions, fixtures, cabinetwork, furniture, or other appliances or equipment, including any work necessary to install these items, or any alterations or additions to any building necessary to install these items, as long as the alterations do not affect the structural safety of the building.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural and Engineering Basic Services Fee Negotiation Guidelines
    Architectural and Engineering Basic Services Fee Estimating Guidelines Basic Services is the design work customary on a typical project to take an established building program, site, and budget, and then develop the architectural design, engineer the building systems, produce construction documents, and perform construction administration for a single phase project. Basic Services include the design services customary on every project such as architectural, structural, civil, mechanical, and electrical engineering services. Basic Services are described in the Standard Consulting Agreement. The following method estimates the Basic Services fees using the Amount Available for Construction (AAC) from the established project budget. The fees are expressed as percentage of AAC for six (6) projects types with differing levels of complexity for both New Construction and Renovation. The Project Types are: Project Type I – Considerably Less than Average Complexity: Farm Structures, shop & Maintenance, Service, Warehouses, Storage Facilities, Parking Structures. Project Type II – Less Than Average Complexity: Student Housing, Office Buildings, Complex Parking Structures. Project Type III – Average Complexity: Classroom Facilities, General Teaching Spaces, Medical Offices, Clinics, Gymnasia. Project Type IV – More Than Average Complexity: Complex University Buildings, Engineering Laboratories, University Libraries, Dining Facilities, Theaters, Arenas, Auditoriums, Medical Schools. Project Type V – Considerably More than Average Complexity: Science and Medical Research Buildings, Hospitals, Museums. Project Type VI – Engineering Projects: Campus/Building Chilled Water, Steam, Fire Protection, or Hot Water Systems; Campus/Building Electrical Distribution Systems; Building Replacement Mechanical or Electrical Systems; Building or Campus Generator Systems; Campus Fire Alarm or Security Systems; Outdoor Lighting or Sports Lighting; Retrofit Building Fire Protection Systems; Campus Voice/Data Systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenneth Frampton — Megaform As Urban Landscape
    / . ~ - . ' -- r • • 1 ·' \ I ' 1999 Raoul Wallenberg Lecture . __ . Meg~fQrm as Urban .Landscape ~ · ~ · _ · - Kenneth Framrton . l • r ..... .. ' ' '. ' '. ,·, ·, J ' , .. .• -~----------- .:.. Published to commemorate the Raoul Wallenberg Memorial Lecture given by Kenneth Frampton at the College on February 12, 1999. Editor: Brian Carter Design: Carla Swickerath Typeset in AkzidenzGrotesk and Baskerville Printed and bound in the United States ISBN: 1-89"97-oS-8 © Copyright 1999 The University of Michigan A. Alfred T aubman College of Architecture + Urban Planning and Kenneth Frampton, New York. The University of Michigan A. Alfred Taubman College of Architecture + Urban Planning 2000 Bonisteel Boulevard Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2069 USA 734 764 1300 tel 734 763 2322 fax www.caup.umich.edu Kenneth Frampton Megaform as Urban Landscape The University of Michigan A. Alfred Taubman College of Architecture + Urban Planning 7 Foreword Raoul Wallenberg was born in Sweden in 1912 and came to the University of Michigan to study architecture. He graduated with honors in 1935, when he also received the American Institute of Architects Silver Medal. He returned to Europe at a time of great discord and, in 1939, saw the outbreak of a war which was to engulf the world in unprecedented terror and destruction. By 1944 many people, including thousands ofjews in Europe, were dead and in March of that year Hitler ordered Adolph Eichman to prepare for the annihilation ofthejewish population in Hungary. In two months 450,000 Jews were deported to Germany, and most of those died. In the summer of that same year Raoul Wallenberg, who was 32 years old, went to Budapest as the first Secretary of the Swedish Delegation in Hungary.
    [Show full text]
  • OKLAHOMA STATUTES TITLE 61 Public Buildings and Public Works
    OKLAHOMA STATUTES TITLE 61 Public Buildings and Public Works (Includes Revisions through 2011 Legislative Session) Notice: These statutes were compiled to assist agencies and citizens doing business with the Construction and Properties Division. Although we have made every effort to assure they are correct, they are not warranted as to accuracy. In addition to the official published version, Oklahoma statutes may be accessed at several state websites, which include www.oscn.net and www.lsb.state.ok.us Title 61. Public Buildings and Public Works THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Laws through 2011 Legislative Session Title 61. Public Buildings and Public Works Title 61. Public Buildings and Public Works Table of Contents § 1. Contracts Exceeding Certain Amount - Bond - Irrevocable Letter of Credit - Affidavit of Payment ................................................................................................................................................. 6 § 1.1. Repealed by Laws 2006, SB 558, c. 271, § 37, emerg. eff. July 1, 2006 ............................... 6 § 2. Filing of Bond - Action on Bond - Subcontractors. .................................................................. 6 § 3. Working Day for Public Employees. ........................................................................................ 7 § 4. Public Contracts Made on Basis of Eight-Hour Day. ............................................................... 7 § 5. Penalty for Violating Two Preceding Sections .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Construction History: Between Technological and Cultural History
    Construction history: between technological and cultural history. The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Picon, Antoine. 2005/2006. Construction history: between technological and cultural history. Construction History 21: 5-19. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10977385 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA CONSTRUCTION HISTORY: BETWEEN TECHNOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL HISTORY INTRODUCTION Construction history is a thriving domain. With its international attendance and the large range of themes and topics dealt with, the Second International Congress of Construction History organized in Cambridge in spring 2006 was a good proof of it1. Some twenty years ago, a similar enterprise would have been certainly more modest in scope and ambition. This spectacular success provides a good opportunity to question construction history, to envisage in particular the type of relation it has or should have with other domains of historical research. In this paper, I would like to examine in particular its position vis-à-vis history of technology on the one hand, cultural history on the other. While its relation to history of technology may seem simple at first, a closer look reveals a series of complex problems. For construction history represents both an integral part of history of technology and a very special field with strong idiosyncrasies.
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT REQUIRES SIGNATURE of a CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR CALIFORNIA REGISTERED ARCHITECT? Sections 5538 and 6745 Of
    City of Santa Maria Community Development Department Building & Safety Division (805) 925-0951 extension 2241 Fax (805) 928-8275 WHAT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF A CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR CALIFORNIA REGISTERED ARCHITECT? All plans submitted for permit are required to be signed by either a California Professional Engineer or California Registered Architect, as specified in Sections 5537 and 6737 of the California Business & Professions Code with the following exceptions for exempt structures: Single family dwellings of conventional woodframe construction not more than two stories and basement in height. Multiple dwellings containing not more than four dwelling units (total of existing plus new) of woodframe construction on any lawfully divided lot. Total of four dwelling units in clusters such as apartments or condominiums, Garages or other structures appurtenant to single-family dwelling or multiple dwellings not more than two stories and basement in height. Agricultural and ranch buildings unless the building official deems that an undue risk to the public health, safety or welfare is involved. However, if any portion of any structure exempted by these sections, deviates from the requirements for conventional light wood-frame construction or tables of limitation for wood frame construction found in Division IV of Chapter 23 (Section 2320) of the Building Code as adopted by local jurisdiction, then the building official may require the preparation of plans, drawings, specifications or calculations for that portion a Professional Engineer or Registered Architect. The documents for that portion shall bear the stamp and signature of the licensee who is responsible for their preparation. Sections 5538 and 6745 of the California Business & Professions Code: These Sections of the California Business & Professions Code do not prohibit any person from furnishing plans for any of the following: Nonstructural store fronts, interior alterations, fixtures, cabinetwork, furniture, or other appliances or equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of Architect and Contractor in Construction Management
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Michigan School of Law University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 6 1973 The Roles of Architect and Contractor in Construction Management John E. Lehman University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr Part of the Construction Law Commons, Legislation Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation John E. Lehman, The Roles of Architect and Contractor in Construction Management, 6 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 447 (1973). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol6/iss2/8 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ROLES OF ARCHITECT AND CONTRACTOR IN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT For the architect and building contractor the most significant aspect of modern commercial construction may not be the design but rather the management, consisting of coordination and admin- istration, of large-scale building projects. Despite the importance of construction management, especially in mammoth and complex projects such as New York's World Trade Center, legislatures have been slow to respond to the needs and practices of the construction industry. Although the skills involved indicate that the role of construction manager is more appropriately assumed by a contractor, the laws of several states provide that only a licensed architect can take responsible charge of construction.
    [Show full text]
  • You and Your Architect
    You and your architect Design and construction are inherently exciting. There are few things more satisfying than a successful project. The secret to success lies in the professional, business, and personal relationships between owner and architect. You and Your Architect provides guidance on how to establish and benefit from those relationships. Contents Getting Started 2 Selecting Your Architect 4 The Important Choices 6 Services Available from Architects 8 Negotiating the Agreement 10 Compensating Your Architect 12 Keeping the Project on Track 14 This booklet—originally written for The American Institute of Architects by AIA Honor Award recipient David Haviland, professor of architecture at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute—is updated periodically to reflect current industry practices. For more information about working with an architect, please contact your local chapter of The American Institute of Architects or the national headquarters of the AIA at 800-242-3837/www.aia.org. Experience tells us that successful projects... those that achieve the desired results for owners, users, and architects—result from informed clients working with skilled architects to form professional, business, and often personal relationships. These relationships are formed early on and are nourished by clear communication, mutually understood expectations, and a willingness of both client and architect to understand and accept their responsibilities for realizing a successful project. Building in today’s marketplace is a complex undertaking requiring many different products and skills. Your architect understands the complexities and works with you to design an appropriate response to your requirements. In turn, your architect works in your interest within the building industry and can help you greatly to trans- form the design into a wonderful building.
    [Show full text]
  • Megastructures
    n.3 2018 vol.I Megastructures Dominique Rouillard edited by Wolfgang Fiel Dominique Rouillard Xavier Van Rooyen Anna Rosellini Francesco Zuddas Lorenzo Ciccarelli Lorenzo Diana Beatrice Lampariello Valentin Bourdon Scientific Commitee Editorial Team Nicholas Adams (Vassar College), Micaela Antonucci Histories of Ruth Baumeister (Aarhus School abstract and paper submission editor of Architecture), Francesco Benelli Stefano Ascari (Università di Bologna), Eve Blau graphic and design editor Postwar (Harvard University), Federico Bucci, Politecnico di Milano, Matteo Cassani Simonetti Maristella Casciato (Getty images manager Architecture Research Institute), Pepa Cassinello Lorenzo Ciccarelli (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid), editorial assistant ISSN 2611-0075 Carola Hein (Delft University of https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-0075/v1-n3-2018 Technology), Helene Janniere Elena Formia (Université Rennes 2), Giovanni communication manager Leoni (Università di Bologna), Beatrice Lampariello Thomas Leslie (Iowa State editorial assistant University), Mary Caroline McLeod (Columbia University), Daniel J. Sofia Nannini Naegele (Iowa State University), editorial assistant Joan Ockman (Penn University), Gabriele Neri Antoine Picon (Harvard Graduate editorial assistant School of Design), Antonio Pizza (Escola Tècnica Superior Anna Rosellini paper review and publishing editor under the auspices of d’Arquitectura de Barcelona), Dominique Rouillard (Ecole Matteo Sintini Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture journal manager de Paris Malaquais), Paolo Scrivano (Xi’an Jiaotong University - Ines Tolic University of Liverpool), Laurant abstract and paper submission editor Stalder (ETH Zurich), Martino AISU Stierli (MoMA), Rosa Tamborrino, Associazione Italiana di Storia Urbana Politecnico di Torino, André Carinha Tavares (Universidade do Minho), Letizia Tedeschi, (Archivio del Moderno, Università della Svizzera Italiana), Herman van Bergeijk, AISTARCH (Delft University of Technology), Società Italiana di Storia dell’Architettura Christophe van Gerrewey (EPFL).
    [Show full text]