DOCSLIB.ORG

Hood Shooting Survivors to Face Gunman at Trial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hood Shooting Survivors to Face Gunman at Trial • DOAAarmyaaN'T MISS: • ArmArmy • • Army Times August 5, 2013 • Photo gallery: Hood shooting survivors to face gunman at trial Aug. 5, 2013 - 06:00AM | 2 Comments Unknown Formatted: Font:(Default) Helvetica, 12 pt, Font color: Custom Color(RGB(44,44,44)) Retired Staff Sgt. Alonzo Lunsford holds one of the bullets removed from his body after he was wounded in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting rampage. Unknown Formatted: Font:(Default) Helvetica, 12 0 pt, Font color: Custom Color(RGB(44,44,44)), Hidden By Ramit Plushnick-Masti and Allen G. Breed The Associated Press Unknown Formatted: Font:(Default) Helvetica, 12 pt, Font color: Custom Color(RGB(44,44,44)) Zoom In a June 4 photo at his home in Lillington, N.C., retired Staff Sgt. Alonzo Lunsford describes his wounds from the 2009 Fort Hood shooting rampage. (Chuck Burton/AP) Key questions about Fort Hood shooting trial DALLAS – Maj. Nidal Hasan will stand trial in a court-martial that starts Tuesday for the shooting rampage at Fort Hood that left 13 people dead and more than 30 people wounded at the Texas Army post on Nov. 5, 2009. Here are some details about the case so far and what to expect from the trial: What charges does Hasan face? Hasan faces 13 specifications of premeditated murder and 32 specifications of attempted premeditated murder under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. If convicted, he would face the death penalty. Why has the case taken so long to prosecute? Judges in the case have granted a series of delays for preparation or other issues, often at the request of Hasan or his attorneys. A fight over Hasan’s beard, which violates military regulations, led to a stay shortly before the trial was expected to begin last year and the eventual replacement of the judge. Legal experts have said authorities are doing their best to avoid mistakes that could lead to a reversal of any guilty verdict, noting that Hasan would have multiple mandatory appeals if he’s found guilty of murder and sentenced to death. Military appeals courts have overturned most death sentences they’ve seen in the last three decades. What will the victims say at trial? Many of those wounded in the attack are expected to testify. Some of them have already described that day in open court, during a hearing three years ago to determine whether Hasan would stand trial. One victim, Spc. Alan Carroll, recalled playing dead so Hasan wouldn’t shoot him again. Another, Staff Sgt. Alonzo Lunsford, said he remembered a woman shouting about the gunman: “He’s one of ours! He’s one of ours!” What will Hasan say? Hasan is representing himself at trial. He wanted to argue that he carried out the shooting in “defense of others” — namely, Muslim insurgents fighting American soldiers in Afghanistan — but the judge, Col. Tara Osborn, denied that strategy. Osborn has also told him that he will not be able to make speeches about his beliefs or try to testify himself when he’s questioning witnesses. What Is Hasan’s physical condition? Hasan was shot in the back by officers responding to the shootings. He is now paralyzed from the waist down, confined to a wheelchair, uses a catheter and wears adult diapers. His doctor testified earlier this year that Hasan cannot sit upright for more than 12 hours a day without his concentration being affected, requiring testimony to conclude each day by 5 p.m. at the latest since inmates at his jail wake up before dawn. Hasan also requires 15- to 20-minute stretching breaks about every four hours, and has to lift himself off his wheelchair for about a minute every half hour to avoid developing sores. Is Hasan still considered a soldier? Yes. He has retained his rank of major and his salary even in jail. Recently, he has worn a camouflage uniform in court instead of the dress uniform defendants typically wear in a court-martial. Osborn has said the camouflage uniform is easier for him to wear as a paraplegic. How does a military court-martial differ from a civilian criminal trial? The judge, the prosecutors and the attorneys standing by to help Hasan are military officers, as are the 13 jurors, who range in rank from colonel to major. The jurors must be unanimous to find Hasan guilty of premeditated murder. If that happens, Hasan’s case would quickly proceed to a capital sentencing hearing, where prosecutors try to prove one or more aggravating factors that merit a death sentence. One aggravating factor would be the killing of more than one person in an incident. Jurors must be unanimous to sentence him to death. However, three-quarters of the jury must vote yes to convict Hasan for attempted murder. The military courts system also does not have hung juries: If one of the 13 jurors votes Hasan not guilty of murder, he would be declared not guilty. What happens if he’s sentenced to death? The death sentence would need to be affirmed by Fort Hood’s commanding authority, which would prompt automatic appeals at two military courts for the Army and then the armed forces. If those fail, Hasan could ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review his case and file motions in federal court. The U.S. president must eventually approve a military death sentence. Five condemned soldiers are currently on the military death row at Fort Leavenworth, Kan. If their cases are any guide, it would likely be decades before Hasan were executed. Many death row inmates have had their sentences overturned on appeal, and no active-duty soldier has been executed in the military system since 1961. — Nomaan Merchant, The Associated Press Unknown More Formatted: Font:(Default) Helvetica, 12 pt, Font color: Custom Related Links Color(RGB(44,44,44)) o Prosecutor: Hasan meticulously planned attack o Photo gallery: After lengthy delays, Fort Hood trial set to open o Fort Hood shooting suspect renounces citizenship LILLINGTON, N.C. – Alonzo Lunsford has trouble getting out of chairs and warns his family to wake him gently. Kathy Platoni can’t shake the image of the man who died in a pool of blood at her knees. Shawn Manning still has two bullets in his body and gets easily unnerved by crowds. Survivors of the 2009 shooting rampage that claimed the lives of 13 people at the Fort Hood Army base in Texas fight these demons daily. Now after years of delay, they will come face to face with Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the Army psychiatrist who goes on trial in the attack starting Tuesday. After dismissing his attorneys, Hasan got permission to represent himself, putting him in the unusual position of asking questions of the very people he admits targeting. Hasan, a Muslim who argues he was protecting the Taliban from American aggression, was shot by a civilian police officer and is now in a wheelchair, paralyzed from the abdomen down. Manning dreads the courtroom confrontation. “I have to keep my composure and not go after the guy,” said Manning, a mental health specialist who was preparing to deploy to Afghanistan with Hasan. “I’m not afraid of him, obviously. He’s a paralyzed guy in a wheelchair, but it’s sickening that he’s still living and breathing.” Lunsford — a now-retired staff sergeant who was shot seven times — relishes the thought of staring at Hasan and telling him that he did not win. Like Manning, he carries two bullets with him — one in a small wooden box, the other in his back. “That man strikes no fear in my heart. He strikes no fear in my family. What he did to me was bad. But the biggest mistake that he made was I survived. So he will see me again,” he said as he sat on his porch in Lillington, rubbing the shiny slug between his fingers. “I will never show any fear in the face of my enemy,” he added. “Never.” Platoni just hopes she can keep her composure enough to support the family of Capt. John Gaffaney, the friend and soldier who died next to her. The families of people who were killed struggle with a roller coaster of emotions, too. Eduardo Caraveo, whose father, Libardo Eduardo Caraveo, died, took a few weeks of leave from his job as a prison supervisor to deal with his emotions ahead of the trial. “You’re going to hear stuff ... that you don’t know how you’re going to take,” he said. Joleen Cahill, whose husband, Mike Cahill, was shot six times after he lifted a chair to try to stop Hasan, has struggled with the loneliness of an empty house. Now she wants to ensure that her anger doesn’t take over during the trial. “I want to be the one in control here, not him,” she said. In the large hall where troops were preparing for upcoming deployments, everyone was unarmed. Everyone except Hasan. Manning, who had gotten married just a few weeks before the shooting, was almost done for the day. Platoni had left the hall and was in a nearby dome-shaped building. Left behind were her friends — including Caraveo — sitting in a row of chairs. Then in an instant, lives were changed forever. “I hear someone yell ‘allahu akbar,’” recalled Manning, who had done two previous deployments in Iraq. “Usually something bad is going to follow after that, so I look up at him and he started shooting. He probably fired five or six shots before he shot me in the chest.” For a moment, Manning thought it was a military drill using paint balls.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Social Roots of Islamist Militancy in the West
    Valdai Papers #21 | July 2015 The Social Roots of Islamist Militancy in the West Emmanuel Karagiannis The Social Roots of Islamist Militancy in the West Introduction The phenomenon of Islamist militancy in the West has preoccupied the public, media and governments. The September 11 events aggravated the already strained relations between the West and the Muslim world. The fact that the perpetrators of the terrorist attacks were Muslims, who had travelled to the United States from European cities, brought the Old Continent’s Islamic communities to the spotlight. The homegrown Madrid and London bombings on March 11, 2004 and July 7, 2005, respectively, only confirmed in the eyes of some people the untrustworthiness of European Muslims. In the United States, there have also been some high-profile cases of jihadi attacks or plots in the post-9/11 period (e.g. the 2003 Brooklyn Bridge plot, 2009 Fort Hood shooting). While these attacks and plots were different from each other, they can be classified as cases of Islamist militancy. For the purpose of this study, Islamist militancy will be defined as the aggressive and often violent pursuit of a cause associated with Islam. Although it is very difficult to know precisely the number of Western Muslims who have been recruited by jihadi groups, a survey conducted by the Nixon Center revealed that there were 212 suspected and convicted terrorists implicated in North American and Western Europe between 1993 and 2003.1 In addition, Edwin Bakker’s study identified 242 individual cases of jihadi terrorists in Europe during 2001-2006.2 Most recently, there has been a resurgence of Islamist violence in Europe, Australia, Canada and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Muslim-American Terrorism in the Decade Since 9/11
    Muslim-American Terrorism in the Decade Since 9/11 CHARLES KURZMAN DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL FEBRUARY 8, 2012 Muslim-American Terrorism Down in 2011 This is the third annual report on Muslim‐American terrorism suspects and perpetrators published by the Twenty Muslim-Americans were indicted for Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security. violent terrorist plots in 2011, down from 26 the year before, bringing the total since 9/11 The first report, co‐authored by David Schanzer, to 193, or just under 20 per year (see Figure Charles Kurzman, and Ebrahim Moosa in early 2010, 1). This number is not negligible -- small also examined efforts by Muslim‐Americans to prevent numbers of Muslim-Americans continue to radicalization. The second report, authored by Charles radicalize each year and plot violence. Kurzman and issued in early 2011, also examined the However, the rate of radicalization is far less source of the initial tips that brought these cases to the than many feared in the aftermath of 9/11. In attention of law‐enforcement authorities. This third early 2003, for example, Robert Mueller, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, report, authored by Charles Kurzman and issued in told Congress that “FBI investigations have early 2012, focuses on cases of support for terrorism, revealed militant Islamics [sic] in the US. We in addition to violent plots. These reports, and the data strongly suspect that several hundred of these on which they are based, are available at 1 extremists are linked to al-Qaeda.” http://kurzman.unc.edu/muslim‐american‐terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • History – 2000 Thru 2014
    This Time in History NOTABLE EVENTS IN WORLD/U.S. HISTORY - CONTINUED 2000 - 2014 2008 Oil prices in the U.S. hit a record $147 per barrel IMMANUEL MILESTONES Global financial crisis - stock market crashed 2006 Pre-school added to school 2009 Fort Hood shooting - 12 servicemen killed, 31 injured An association formed with Grace Church in Hutchinson, thus Immanuel H1N1 (swine flu) global pandemic Lutheran School and Children of Grace Pre-School 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill - 4.9 million barrels of oil spilt into the Gulf of Mexico Pastors 2011 Gabrielle Giffords, U.S. Representative, shot & critically injured in Tucson, Ronald Siemers (1995-2001) Daniel Reich (2001-present) AZX, 6 others killed Principals/Teachers Osama bin Laden, U.S. most wanted terrorist, killed by U.S. Navy Seals in Timothy Schuh (1997-2006) Cheryl Schuh (1997-2006) Pakistan Koreen Koehler (2000-2002) Leanne Reich (2002-2004) A nuclear catastrophe in Tokyo resulted from a 9.0 earthquake in Japan Justin Groth (2006-2010) Heidi Groth (2006-2010) One of the deadliest tornado season known in U.S. history - amongst the most Kristin (Slovik) Utsch (2008-present) Alex Vandenberg (2010-present) devastating was in Joplin, MO Stephanie Vandenberg (2010-present) 2012 Hurricane Sandy caused devastation along the east coast - 132 deaths; $82 billion in damages WELS/LUTHERAN KEYPOINTS Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, CT - killed 26 people 2001 Time of Grace began airing on TV of which 20 were children between the ages of 6 and 7 2008 Christian Worship Supplement published 2013 Boston Marathon Bombings - two pressure cookers used in explosions; killed U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • COMBAT STRESS Harnessing Post-Traumatic Stress for Service Members, Veterans, and First Responders
    The American Institute of Stress COMBAT STRESS Harnessing Post-Traumatic Stress for Service Members, Veterans, and First Responders Volume 8 Number 3 Fall 2019 Fort Hood Massacre Tenth Anniversary Nothing has changed: Still Workplace Violence AND the Escalating Epidemic of Veteran Suicides. The mission of AIS is to improve the health of the The mission of AIS is to improve the health of the community and the world by setting the standard of community and the world by setting the standard of excellence of stress management in education, research, excellence of stress management in education, research, clinical care and the workplace. Diverse and inclusive, clinical care and the workplace. Diverse and inclusive, The American Institute of Stress educates medical The American Institute of Stress educates medical practitioners, scientists, health care professionals and practitioners, scientists, health care professionals and the public; conducts research; and provides information, the public; conducts research; and provides information, training and techniques to prevent human illness related training and techniques to prevent human illness related to stress. to stress. AIS provides a diverse and inclusive environment that AIS provides a diverse and inclusive environment that fosters intellectual discovery, creates and transmits fosters intellectual discovery, creates and transmits innovative knowledge, improves human health, and innovative knowledge, improves human health, and provides leadership to the world on stress related topics. provides leadership to the world on stress related topics. Harnessing Post-Traumatic Stress for Service Members, Veterans, and First Responders COMBAT STRESS We value opinions of our readers. Please feel free to contact us with any comments, suggestions or inquiries.
    [Show full text]
  • American Jihadist Terrorism: Combating a Complex Threat
    American Jihadist Terrorism: Combating a Complex Threat /name redacted/ Specialist in Organized Crime and Terrorism February 19, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R41416 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress American Jihadist Terrorism: Combating a Complex Threat Summary This report describes homegrown violent jihadists and the plots and attacks that have occurred since 9/11. For this report, “homegrown” describes terrorist activity or plots perpetrated within the United States or abroad by American citizens, lawful permanent residents, or visitors radicalized largely within the United States. The term “jihadist” describes radicalized individuals using Islam as an ideological and/or religious justification for their belief in the establishment of a global caliphate, or jurisdiction governed by a Muslim civil and religious leader known as a caliph. The term “violent jihadist” characterizes jihadists who have made the jump to illegally supporting, plotting, or directly engaging in violent terrorist activity. The report also discusses the radicalization process and the forces driving violent extremist activity. It analyzes post-9/11 domestic jihadist terrorism and describes law enforcement and intelligence efforts to combat terrorism and the challenges associated with those efforts. Appendix A provides details about each of the post-9/11 homegrown jihadist terrorist plots and attacks. There is an “executive summary” at the beginning that summarizes the report’s findings. Congressional
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorist Watch List Screening and Background Checks for Firearms
    Terrorist Watch List Screening and Background Checks for Firearms William J. Krouse Specialist in Domestic Security and Crime Policy May 1, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42336 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Terrorist Watch List Screening and Background Checks for Firearms Summary The November 2009 shooting at Fort Hood, TX, renewed interest in terrorist watchlist screening and background checks for firearms through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). Pursuant to the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (P.L. 103-159), in November 1998 the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) activated NICS for the purposes of determining an individual’s firearms transfer and possession eligibility whenever a private person seeks to acquire a firearm from a federally licensed gun dealer. Prior to February 2004, however, the FBI did not conduct terrorist watchlist queries as part of firearms background checks because being a known or suspected terrorist was not a disqualifying factor for firearms transfer and possession eligibility; nor is it today under current law. Similarly, the April 15, 2013, Boston Marathon bombing could generate renewed interest in terrorist watchlist screening, because at least one of the alleged perpetrators was possibly entered into the National Counterterrorism Center’s (NCTC’s) Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE). As a consequence, he was possibly watch-listed in the FBI-led Terrorist Screening Center’s Terrorist Screening Database—the U.S. government’s master watchlist of known and suspected terrorists. In addition, on April 18, 2013, both alleged perpetrators—Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev—are further alleged to have shot and killed a police officer, high-jacked an automobile and taken its owner hostage at gunpoint, and engaged in a subsequent shootout with police.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining the Lack of an American Domestic Counter-Radicalization Strategy
    Explaining the Lack of an American Domestic Counter-radicalization Strategy Lorenzo Vidino Over the last ten years, many countries throughout the world have sharpened their approaches to countering extremism and terrorism. Basing their judgment on direct experience and academic studies, many governments have come to reject the more simplistic assumptions about radicalization. Few believe that terrorists are innately deviant, born destined to become terrorists or that once a terrorist, always a terrorist. On the contrary, it is widely believed that, in at least some cases, the radicalization process that leads people to carry out acts of politically motivated violence can be prevented or even reversed. Working from these revised assumptions, several countries have created counter-radicalization programs that differ markedly in their extents and aims. Counter-radicalization commonly includes three types of programs, each with a distinctive objective: deradicalization, disengagement, and radicalization prevention.1 Deradicalization measures seek to lead an already radicalized individual to abandon his or her militant views. Disengagement entails a less dramatic shift whereby an individual abandons involvement in a terrorist group or activities while perhaps retaining a radical worldview. Radicalization prevention measures seek to prevent the radicalization process from taking hold in the first place and generally target a segment of society rather than a specific individual. Certain Muslim-majority countries, having been the first targets of al Qaeda or al Qaeda– inspired attacks, have been among the first to engineer counter-radicalization programs, focusing mostly on deradicalization and disengagement. The programs implemented in Saudi Arabia and Indonesia, for example, have attracted the attention of experts and policymakers for their innovative approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • 13Mar Mbunn Keynote.Pdf
    KEYNOTE MATTHEW BUNN Professor of Practice, Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A Worst Practices Guide to Preventing Leaks, Attacks, Theft, and Sabotage Matthew Bunn (with Scott D. Sagan) Insider Threat Mitigation Brussels, Belgium March 12-14, 2019 Insider Threats are the Most Dangerous Nuclear Security Problem • The known HEU and Pu thefts, and most sabotages, involved insiders • More real incidents than people often recognize • Insiders have authorization to go through many layers of the security system • Insiders are known colleagues • Insiders may understand key aspects of facility operations and the facility’s security system • Can learn from both nuclear and high-security non-nuclear cases 4 Recent U.S. Examples: Insiders Charged with Spying, Preparing to Kill • February 2019: Monica Witt (Fatemah Zarah), indicted for spying for Iran • 10-yr Air Force intelligence veteran (and later contractor) • Allegedly helped target U.S. agents, revealed a SIGINT program • Defected to Iran in 2013 • February 2019: Lt. Christopher Hasson, arrested, charged with plotting domestic terrorism • >20 yrs in Coast Guard • Allegedly lanned to kill leading left- leaning political, media figures • 2017 letter: “dreaming of a way to kill almost every last person” Monica Witt, Christopher Hasson 5 • Insider position apparently not used Source: U.S. Justice Department A Recent Example: Insider Sabotage and a Cleared Terrorist at Doel-4 • August 2014: An insider at Doel-4 reactor in Belgium drains lubricant,
    [Show full text]
  • SIGINT for Anyone
    THE ORIGINS OF AMERICA’S JIHADISTS THE ORIGINS OF AMERICA’S About This Perspective The U.S. homeland faces a multilayered threat from terrorist organizations. Homegrown jihadists account for most of the terrorist activity in the United States since 9/11. Efforts by jihadist terrorist organizations to inspire terrorist attacks in the United States have thus far yielded meager results. No American jihadist group has emerged to sustain a terrorist campaign, and there is no evidence of an active jihadist underground to support a continuing terrorist holy war. The United States has invested significant resources in THE ORIGINS OF preventing terrorist attacks, and authorities have been able to uncover and thwart most of the terrorist plots. This Perspective identifies 86 plots to carry out terrorist attacks and 22 actual attacks since 9/11 involving 178 planners and perpetrators. Eighty-seven percent of those planners and perpetrators had long residencies in the United States. Only four of them had come to the United States illegally, all as minors. Nationality is a poor predictor of later terrorist activity, and vetting people coming to the United States, no matter how rigorous, cannot identify those who radicalize here. Determining whether a young teenager might, more than 12 years later, turn out to be a jihadist AMERICA’S terrorist would require the bureaucratic equivalent of divine foresight. Jenkins JIHADISTS Brian Michael Jenkins $21.00 ISBN-10 0-8330-9949-3 ISBN-13 978-0-8330-9949-5 52100 C O R P O R A T I O N www.rand.org Perspective EXPERT INSIGHTS ON A TIMELY POLICY ISSUE C O R P O R A T I O N 9 780833 099495 R PE-251-RC (2017) barcode_template_CC15.indd 1 10/17/17 12:00 PM Contents Summary of Key Judgments ..................................................................................1 The Origins of America’s Jihadists .........................................................................3 Appendix .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Military Law Review, Volume 223, Issue 3, 2015
    Volume 223 Issue 3 2015 U.S. DEP’T OF ARMY PAMPHLET 27-100-223-3 PAMPHLET ARMY OF DEP’T MILITARY LAW REVIEW ARTICLES OUT OF FOCUS: EXPANDING THE DEFINITION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY IN THE MILITARY Major Kenneth W. Borgnino MILITARY LAW REVIEW LAW MILITARY THE SEARCH FOR STATUS: CHARTING THE CONTOURS OF COMBATANT STATUS IN THE AGE OF ISIS Lieutentant Colonel R. Aubrey Davis III HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION IN SYRIA: IS CRISIS RESPONSE AND LIMITED CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS THE SOLUTION? Major William D. Hood THE CODE INDICTED: WHY THE TIME IS RIGHT TO IMPLEMENT A GRAND JURY PROCEEDING IN THE MILITARY Major John G. Doyle JUS IN BELLO FUTURA IGNOTUS: THE UNITED STATES, THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, AND THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT Lieutenant Colonel James T. Hill BECOMING A HARDER TARGET: UPDATING MILITARY FIREARMS POLICIES TO COMBAT ACTIVE SHOOTERS Major Anthony M. Osborne VOLUME 223 • 2015 Department of the Army Pamphlet 27-100-223-3 Military Law Review Volume 223 Issue 3 2015 CONTENTS Articles Out of Focus: Expanding the Definition of Child Pornography in the Military Major Kenneth W. Borgnino 499 The Search for Status: Charting the Contours of Combatant Status in the Age of ISIS Lieutenant Colonel R. Aubrey Davis III 556 Humanitarian Intervention in Syria: Is Crisis Response and Limited Contingency Operations the Solution? Major William D. Hood 610 The Code Indicted: Why the Time is Right to Implement a Grand Jury Proceeding in the Military Major John G. Doyle 629 Jus in Bello Futura Ignotus: The United States, the International Criminal Court, and the Uncertain Future of the Law of Armed Conflict Lieutenant Colonel James T.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence Issues for Congress
    Intelligence Issues for Congress Marshall Curtis Erwin Analyst in Intelligence and National Security April 23, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33539 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Intelligence Issues for Congress Summary To address the challenges facing the U.S. intelligence community in the 21st century, congressional and executive branch initiatives have sought to improve coordination among the different agencies and to encourage better analysis. In December 2004, the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act (P.L. 108-458) was signed, providing for a Director of National Intelligence (DNI) with authorities to manage the national intelligence effort. The legislation also established a Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Making cooperation effective presents substantial leadership and managerial challenges. The needs of diverse intelligence “consumers” must all be met, using many of the same systems and personnel. The DNI has substantial statutory authorities to address these issues, but the organizational relationships remain complex, especially for intelligence agencies that are part of the Defense Department. Members of Congress in their oversight role may seek to observe the extent to which effective coordination is accomplished. The intelligence community, which comprises 17 agencies, has experienced a decade of budgetary growth. That era was typified by (1) institution building with embryonic organization such as the Office of the DNI and other new or evolving intelligence components, (2) information sharing and collaboration across those institutions, and (3) a focus on counterterrorism. While those issues will remain areas of congressional interest, Members will likely confronted by a new set of intelligence challenges resulting from budgetary realities and from second-order effects stemming from post-9/11 changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Classifying the Methods of Middle Eastern Terrorist Recruitment
    INEGMA Special Report No. 11 Conduits to Terror - Classifying the Methods of Middle Eastern Terrorist Recruitment Amira Choueiki, Intern, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Theodore Karasik, Director of R&D, INEGMA November 2010 Copyright © INEGMA 2010 Any party interested in quoting this study or reproducing it in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, information storage and retrieval) may do so on the condition of providing full attribution to the author and to INEGMA. Reprints are available on request. The views expressed in this Special Report are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the official views of any government. Established in 2001, the Institute for Near East & Gulf Military Analysis (INEGMA) was set up as a Middle East think-tank focusing on military and strategic affairs of the wider region. INEGMA also provides a range of specialist services to clients in government, military, and commercial companies operating in Middle East defense and security, including; Strategy and Risk Management, PR and Marketing Consultancy, and Events Organization. INEGMA is a Free Zone Limited Liability Company based in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, and Beirut, Lebanon. Institute for Near East & Gulf Military Analysis Special Report No. 11 Introduction Over the past decade, world security forces have faced a phenomenon of the “KKK-gone-global”: religious extremist organizations that not only act domestically, but around the world. Knowing that it is too difficult to defeat the United States and other world powers militarily, al-Qaeda and its supporting organizations and franchises have pledged to fight their opponents in two ways: by draining them economically and keeping them distracted, and spread thin by creating threats around the globe.
    [Show full text]