DOCSLIB.ORG

Parshat Vayeitze 5780

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parshat Vayeitze 5780 Dedicated in memory of Rachel Leah bat R' Chaim Tzvi Volume 11 Number 40 Brought to you by Naaleh.com Parshat Vayetze: Genuinely Grateful Based on a Naaleh.com shiur by Mrs. Shira Smiles Summary by Channie Koplowitz Stein The Jewish nation is called Yehudim in Hashem’s “job.” Hebrew. The source for this name appears in Sefer Chareidim points out, if we are We must learn to take nothing for granted, for this week’s parsha as Leah names her fourth commanded to remember daily the kindness of nothing is our due. son Yehudah. The root of Yehudah means Hashem’s taking our ancestors out of Egypt so gratitude. The Gemara in Brachot states that many generations ago, how much more so We are often further prevented from express- no one had expressed gratitude to Hashem must we remember the daily kindnesses ing gratitude because we are overwhelmed by from the time of creation until Leah expressed Hashem bestows upon us as we live our lives our challenges. But we should not assume that it. Yet the Torah itself cites instances of today. Further, just as we see in the challenge Leah faced no trials in her life. Yet she was Avraham, and Eliezer, for example, express- of the Egyptian enslavement the ensuing able to recognize that these very tribulations ing gratitude to Hashem. Therefore, we must blessing to our nation in forging our strength were the source of her blessings, notes the assume that there was something unique in and our collective soul, so must we find the Darash Dovid. Her pain and her prayers Leah’s expression of gratitude. strength to thank Hashem for our current helped her grow spiritually, and for this too she tragedies albeit their purpose is beyond our thanked Hashem. Similarly, we bless Hashem The Shiurei Binah, quoting Rashi, explains comprehension. Therefore, our first act upon over the bitter herbs at the Seder for the that Leah understood that if Yaakov Avinu was arising is expressing gratitude for a new day of suffering that prepared us for the salvation. destined to have twelve sons, her fair portion life for ourselves and for our children. divided among the four wives would be three Rabbi Schwab points out that just as the gifts sons. This fourth son, she felt was beyond her Letitcha Elyon citing Rav M. A. Stern, points of one human to another imply a desire for a fair expectation and therefore merited special out that a mother calls her son many times relationship, so do Hashem’s gifts to us, thanks. Rabbi Wolbe writes that until now, during the course of a day. Each time Leah lehavdil, tell us that He wants a relationship everyone assumed that they were entitled to would call Yehudah, his name would again with us. M. Kosman explains that the essence everything in their lives, for it was all part of evoke those feelings of gratitude she had felt of the female character is nekayvah, defined God’s Divine plan, and Hashem would do it at his birth, thereby maintaining a continuous as a concave shape, perfectly suited for anyway. Only Leah now realized that stream of gratitude for Hashem’s kindness to receiving. God created the world because, everything we have, even the breath of life her. although He lacked nothing, He desired to itself and even if it is part of God’s master plan bestow of His “wealth” to others. Leah made is still a gift from Hashem and something we The Siach Yaakov presents an analogy by herself receptive to God’s gifts, with the birth of need to express our thanks for. As Rabbi Y. contrasting a good guest with a bad guest. The each son thanking Hashem and validating His Kirzner points out, recognizing God’s good guest appreciates everything his host gift to her through the name she gave and, benevolence to us in the small, natural things offers and thanks him for it. The bad guest with the first three sons, extending an implied as well as in the great things, is the essence feels no gratitude. He’s just doing what he request for more children. Likewise, the more of hakorat hatov. Anything less implies needs for himself. Similarly, we are all guests we thank Hashem, the more blessings we arrogance. Therefore, expressions of in Hashem’s house. The good guest thanks draw down to ourselves and to our people. gratitude form the foundation of Jewish Hashem for everything Hashem gives him, prayer. while the bad guest feels entitled, for this is Muktza Part 9: Unwanted Items- Part I Based on a Naaleh.com shiur by Rabbi Shimon Isaacson If money was placed in a drawer before it. If we assume that the main part of the desk quasi -basis and there is a disagreement Shabbat, does the drawer or the entire desk is on top, why would it be a basis? The Mishna between the poskim whether it can be moved. become a basis? If the drawer cannot be Berura explains that as long as the muktza In such a situation, chazal permitted certain entirely removed from the desk, it is not item is somehow reliant to the non -muktza types of movement of the non -muktza considered separate from the desk. However, item it can make it a basis. If the muktza was although it might cause the muktza to be the main part of the desk is the top surface. left there at bein hashemoshot, the base moved. The Mishna says if you have muktza Therefore the drawer becomes batul (nullified) maintains its status of basis all Shabbat even if on a barrel, you’re allowed to do niur-tilt the to the desk and it may be moved on Shabbat. the muktza is removed. barrel to shake off the muktza. Masechas If the drawer is removable, it is considered Beitza discusses bones and shells that were separate from the desk. Therefore the money If you tossed a muktza item down by happen- left on a table. One would be allowed to tilt the would render both the drawer and the desk a stance or the muktza was created on Shabbat table to shake off the muktza. The Gemara basis and one would not be allowed to move and it is sitting on non- muktza which you now rules that if you have a stone on a barrel and if need, may it be moved? This is considered a Continued on page 2 Help support Naaleh by searching the web! For more information visit www.iGive/Naaleh.com & www.iSearchiGive/Naaleh.com visit us online at: www.naaleh.com | for questions, suggestions, or dedication opportunities, email [email protected] 1 Dedicated in memory of Rachel Leah bat R' Chaim Tzvi Volume 11 Number 40 Brought to you by Naaleh.com Muktza Part 9: Unwanted Items- Part I Based on a Naaleh.com shiur by Rabbi Shimon Isaacson Continued from page 1 you would tilt the barrel, you would knock unpleasant bad smelling waste items would be smelling, would one be permitted to remove it? down all the barrels, you would be allowed to counterproductive to delighting in and honoring For example, can one clear off shells and pits lift up the barrel and tilt off the muktza. If the the Shabbat. Therefore chazal allowed a from the table? A few stray shells would be non-muktza would be damaged through niyur, person to dispose of it on Shabbat. The muktza and one would not be allowed to move one would be allowed to lift it up and shake off Gemara brings a case of a dead rat which is it. If it’s on a plate it would be a quasi- basis the muktza. However one may not do this to muktza. Rav Ashi instructed one of his and one could do niyur. However if there are save the muktza itself. students to take a dead rat by the tail and large, unpleasant mounds of shells it would be throw it in the garbage. A modern day considered graf shel rei and one would even Why is niyur preferable to tiltul? Muktza was a example of graf shel rei would be a diaper. The be allowed to scoop it up with ones hands and gezeira instituted to prevent tiltul and hotzaah. Shulchan Aruch rules that if there’s human or dispose of it. Rav Bodner quotes Rav Feinstein The first stage of carrying is lifting up the item. animal waste matter in an area where people and Rav Auerbach that it is subjective. If the Therefore niyur is considered a better dwell, it can be disposed of on Shabbat. muktza would cause you or your wife embar- alternative. Garbage falls in the category of However if it’s in place where people are not rassment if guests should come, it would be muktza machmat gufo. What is the basis to usually found, then one would not be allowed considered graf shel rei. If it wouldn’t cause permit taking it out on Shabbat? The Gemara to move it. embarrassment, one would not be allowed to in Shabbat discusses the leniency of graf shel move it. rei, a bedpan. Forcing a person to be around If you have something unpleasant but not foul Shir Shel Yom-Yom Rishon: Part I Based on a Naaleh.com shiur by Rebbetzin Leah Kohn Every day after the shemone esrei of Shachrit During the first stage of creation Hashem opened up the ability for free choice and for we recite the shir shel yom (song of the day) created the building blocks, the smallest people to mistakenly choose not to see Him.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CBS Torah Weekly Matot Masei 2020
    J U L Y 1 8 , 2M0 A2 Y0 |8 , M 2A0 T2 O0 T|- ME AMSOERI | P A G E 1 Congregation Beth Sholom TORAH WEEKLY Learning Initiative ז"ל A Project of the Linda Mitgang To sponsor, please click here The Longest Three Weeks BY RABBI KENNETH HAIN ZMANIM [email protected] Candle-lighting 8:04 pm Mincha 7:00 pm Clearly this summer of the pandemic is a summer of our 8:12 pm discontent. Since March we have struggled with increasing 7:45 am restrictions and numbing isolation. Our celebrations are Shacharit Hashkama 8:45 am curtailed and our social interactions are minimal, and now Shacharit Sephardic 9:15 am we find ourselves in the Three Weeks period before Tish A Shacharit Joel Shiff/Main 8:10 pm B’Av and it hardly feels different from the past four months. Mincha Shiur with Rabbi Miller 8:25 pm I have been exploring new understandings of this Three Maariv 9:05 pm Week period. Our son Rabbi Yonah Hain at Columbia Shabbos Ends 9:11 pm University Hillel has shared with me some remarkable ideas and I hope to share them with you next week in a two part IN THIS ISSUE Zoom series – “ The Challenge of Lamentation” Monday, & Tuesday, July 20-21. 1 The Longest Three Weeks Rabbi Hain Much of our tradition focuses on the anticipation of what will 2 On the 5T's Vaad HaKashrus happen after the Three Week period of sadness. A Midrash Rabbi Fogel from Eicha Rabba 1:2 demonstrates this approach: 4 An Alternate Ending to the Torah “…she has no comforter…” (Lamentations 1:2) – R.
    [Show full text]
  • Shabbos - Simanim ףד ב – Daf 2
    Shabbos - Simanim ףד ב – Daf 2 האצוה The melocho of .1 From the opening Mishna’s eight cases of passing an object between the ba’al habayis standing in his reshus hayachid (private domain) and the poor person standing in reshus harabim (public domain) we learn: a. One has only transgressed m’doraysa the melocho of hotza’ah (transferring) if he does the act of the object from its state of rest in one domain as well as the act of placing it down )הריע(ק lifting .in another domain ( החנה ) lest one come to do both החנה or קע י הר b. The Rabbis forbid one from doing one of the acts of elements of the transfer. (Bringing in) כה הסנ .2 כה נ הס taking out) also refers to) האצוה Rav Ashi teaches that the Mishna’s usage of the term . האצוה bringing in), since the Mishna includes cases of bringing in as examples of) The Gemara further clarifies that the Tanna refers to any removal of an object from its place as an act of “taking out.” 3. Domains transfers) in the Mishna he is referring to) תואיצי Rava said the when the Tanna uses the word domains. Therefore, the Mishna is understood to mean that there are two domains where one is prohibited to commit four acts of transferring. Siman – House The strange house, where the owner kept passing objects back and forth to a poor person standing outside, featured an exit sign over the entrance and a door mat that said Welcome to the Home of Two Domains.
    [Show full text]
  • Parshat Mikeitz 5781
    Dedicated in memory of Rachel Leah bat R' Chaim Tzvi Volume 12 Number 39 Brought to you by Naaleh.com Intro to Sefer Mishlei Expanded Based on a Naaleh.com shiur by Rebbetzin Tziporah Heller The first six verses of Mishlei are the introduc- opposite trait not just via deeds but through a much more powerful effect. That is why tory pesukim to the entire book. If you master inner work. If you treat anger like stinginess, Mishlei uses the expression, latet (to give). if this, you’ve got the table of contents of your you won’t get anywhere because the two traits you can get the gullible or impulsive person to inner life which is worth having. We spoke are so different. The opposite of anger is teach someone else, the teachings of this about why meshalim are used. We compassion. Developing compassion requires book will be different. If you take upon yourself understand the concrete better than the empathy which takes you to patience which to teach someone, you’ll experience Divine abstract. We spoke about the relationship of gives you the willingness to bear the other assistance. Pirke Avot tells us, “If you’ve the mashal to the nishmal, the parable to its person’s burden. If you reach that level, you’re learned Torah, don’t keep it to yourself….” meaning. The first step in understanding not going to have a temper problem anymore Whatever you know is not your property, teach anything is to want to understand. We spoke because you’ve dealt with the underlying it to others.
    [Show full text]
  • Hebrew Language 11/14/2005 04:01 PM
    Henry Hollander, Bookseller - Catalogue 21 - Hebrew Language 11/14/2005 04:01 PM Henry Hollander Bookseller Nisan 5762 Catalogue No. 21 Hebrew Language Acquisitions Shown above, Three Klezmorim, hand-colored lithograph signed and numbered in an edition of 150, 23"x 29" (image size 19"x 25"), by Chaim Goldberg. $300 unframed; $375 framed with archival backing. Art | Bibliography | Education | Folklore | Haggadot | History | Holocaust | Linguistics | Literature | Philosophy | Prayerbooks | Religion | Science | Theater | ART 1. "Scheinfeld." Tel Aviv, Sabra, 1977. First Edition. Oblong quarto, orange cloth, 68 [#14152] pp., b/w and color illustrations throughout. Very Good. $25.00 Introduction by Ethel Broido in Hebrew and English. Foreword by Baruch Oren. An artist's catalog. 2. "Torah and Toil in the Drawings of Rabbi Abraham Verdiger." Jerusalem, Yad [#14802] Vashem, nd c. 1992. Quarto, fifteen sheets laid in to a folding portfolio with two $20.00 sheet containing an introduction by the curator, Elly Dlin in English and Hebrew. Very Good. Text in Hebrew and English. 3. Donner, Batia, edited by. "Hebrew Graphics - Shamir Brothers Studio." Tel Aviv, [#14140] Tel Aviv Museum, 1999. First Edition. Quarto, paper covers with a narrow wrap- $25.00 around band, 80 pp., color and b/w illustrations throughout, biographical notes. Very Good. Hebrew and English text. Foreword by Mordechai Omer.. "Hebrew Graphic Design," Batia Donner. "On Currency Notes," Maoz Azaryahu. "The Typographical Styles in the Oeuvre of the Shamir Brothers," Yanek Iontef. file:///Users/metafo/Polis/Clients/Henry%20Hollander/HOLLANDERCATS/Cat%2021/cat21.htm Page 1 of 63 Henry Hollander, Bookseller - Catalogue 21 - Hebrew Language 11/14/2005 04:01 PM 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Shulchan Halevi
    ~.. SHULCHAN HALEVI Halachic Responsa From the Desk of HAGAON HARAV Yisroel HaLevi Belsky, shlita 46 SHULCHAN HALEVI samim - \Vho has created fragrant woods'. Ifthe scent derives from a areas in \\'h:~ .. --, grass or similar plant that withers away in the winter, then the blessing eruvin do EC': .::..1 is 'bard isvei besamim \Vho has created fragrant grasses '. 'Borei mi­ machmir --, nei besamim' is made on a scent derived from animals, such as musk, they wish to ' or a mix of spices ground into a powder that cannot be separated, or during havdalah, as mentioned above. Bungalow cole,rrjj These halachos are treated in the Shulchan Aruch,104 and carry a installed co=-:-~ - -­ special importance. Chazapos tell us: "'Let all souls praise God, Hal­ its kashru-. -=-=-__ ' i leluyah: What thing does the soul benefit from [in this world, that it ins are USUe,. :--~, should praise Hashem]? I would say, this refers to fragrance:' Fra­ ha'rabbim '. e':: grance is something the soul itself enjoys. It is certainly worthwhile Even in the .:c' to know the precise blessing to recite on a pleasure that even the soul public dOG':c. __ enjoys. As we have often indicated, the halachos presented here are neve:thele~o--':' only a basic outline. A proper understanding of these halachos can by the e:1:.''­ only be reached by studying and reviewing them thoroughly. colony for ~:-:: Cityeruy: :::- :::::1 ERUV IN BUNGALOW COLONY AND CITy106 complex., ':.= ha'pesClc·;:. Is it preferable to be stringent (machmir) and avoid carrying cannot b:: _'= ~ within the eruv of a city, bungalow colony, or camp? precisely .
    [Show full text]
  • 1983 35 02 00.Pdf
    Volume XXXV November, 1983 Number 2 American Jewish Archives A Journal Devoted to the Preservation and Study of the American Jewish Experience Jacob Rader Marcus, Ph.D., Editor Abraham J. Peck, Ph.M., Associate Editor Published by The American Jewish Archives on the Cincinnati Campus of the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion Dr. Alfred Gottschalk, President American lewish Archives is indexed in The Index to lewish Periodicals, Current Contents, The American Historical Review, United States Political Science Documents, and The journal of American History. Information for Contributors: American lewish Archives follows generally the University of Chicago Press "Manual of Style" (12th revised edition) and "Words into Type" (3rd edition), but issues its otun style sheet which may be obtained by writing to: The Associate Editor, American lezuish Archives 3 101 Clifton Avenue Cincinnati, Ohio 4jzzo Patrons 1983: The Neumann Memorial Publication Fund The Harris and Eliza Kempner Fund Published by The American lewish Archives on the Cincinnati campus of the Hebretu Union College-lewish Institute of Religion ISSN ooz-po~X Or983 by the American jezuish Archives Contents 90 Editorial Note 91 Introduction Jonathan D. Sarna I00 Resisters and Accommodators: Varieties of Orthodox Rabbis in America, I 8 86-1983 Jeffrey S. Gurock 188 The Conservative Rabbi-"Dissatisfied But Not Unhappy" Abraham J. Karp 263 The Changing and the Constant in the Reform Rabbinate David Polish 342 Book Reviews Ravitch, Diane, and Goodenow, Ronald K., Edited by. Educating an Urban People: The New York City Experience Reviewed by Stephan E Brurnberg 348 Friess, Horace L. Felix Adler and Ethical Culture: Memories and Studies (edited by Fannia Weingartner) Reviewed by Benny Kraut 3 52 Geipel, John.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physician on the Sabbath
    The Physician on the Sabbath Juliana Rosenblat The Sabbath is an integral part of every observant Jew’s life. Therefore, it is imperative for observant doctors to be well versed in what allowances are made for medicine on the Sabbath. Doctors should study and develop expertise in the laws of Sabbath so that they will not transgress the laws of them.1 This paper delves into various issues that observant doctors come across in their practice of medicine on the Sabbath. GENERAL PRINCIPLES It says in the Torah, “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work; but the seventh day is a Sabbath for the Lord your God, in it you should not do any manner of work, you nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your servant, nor your cattle, nor a stranger that is within your gates.”2 Rashi explains that the word zachor means both “observe” and “remember”; he explains that both words were spoken simultaneously, and that both are of equal importance.3 Therefore, even if a patient’s care pre- vents a doctor from physically observing the Sabbath, he still must remember it in all of his actions. 1 Yesod Vesoresh HaAvodah 6:3, as cited in the Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics, p. 865. It should be noted that many topics presented in this summary article are complex, and readers are encouraged to investigate issues thoroughly on their own. 2 Shemot 20:7–10. 3 Rashi 20:7. Julianna Rosenblat is a fourth year student at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Daf Yomi Summary Siyum Masechet Eruvin 5781 We May Have Finished Learning Mesechet Eiruv, but How Do We Build an Eruv Today? EDITIO N: 43
    ?''? ? daf yomi summary siyum masechet eruvin 5781 We may have finished learning Mesechet Eiruv, but how do we build an Eruv today? EDITIO N: 43 This edition of the Daf Yomi Summary sheet is dedicated in into the dark days of winter, the feeling of joy and the warm glow of memory of the Tzadikim that sadly passed away during the learning satisfaction of having completed another M asechet in Shas is what of M asechet Eruvin. In particular, in memory of Rabbi Lord Jonathan sustains us. ????? ????? ?? ??? ?? ????? ???? Had it not been for Sacks ?"??, Rabbi David Feinstein ?"??, Yisrael ben M ordechai Your Torah as my delight, I would perished in my affliction (Tehillim Horwitz ?"? and Yehoshua ben Natan Goldstein ?"?. 119;92). The Daf Yomi Summary sheet is a crowd sourced newsletter ? ? ? ? ? ? produced on a weekly basis. If you would like to receive the For me, there is particular significance for this siyum on Daf Yomi newsletter and a daily 3 minute audio daf insight by Rav Effie Eruvin, since having established and had responsibility for an eruv in Kleinberg join the whatsapp group https://bit.ly/daf-daily-insights2 recent years, I was able to look at M asechet Eruvin through new or our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/dafyomisummary. eyes. I am delighted to respond to the approach from afar from an A huge thank you to all the many writers who contributed to the ex-congregant of Whitefield Shul and to contribute my reflections in M asechet Eruvin editions. A huge thanks also you to our fantastic this vein, to M asechet Eruvin in communal Eruv practice for this editorial team.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shofar's Voice Editor Samantha Goldstein Via [email protected], by the 15Th of Each Month
    September 2016 T h e Av-Elul 5776 S h o f a r ' s V o i c e B'nai Israel Synagogue Pg. 1 Pensacola, Fl The Rabbi's Confession: To my wonderful and lovely congregation; It has been five years since I stepped on the holy land. What a wonderful feeling! With all the dificulties our country is facing, Israel is the best place our generation has. To see the French community putting roots in Israel is so great. Jews come to Israel by the millions. My friends, before you go to Europe, south east India, Japan or any jaloshisdic place... come to Israel. The poet Eben Ezrah said eshak avanaich. I will kiss your stone. I promised I would bring Jerusalem dirt to our community. Our life is surrounded with Jewish causes. You must yearn for your place in Israel. The answer for all Jew haters and destroyers is more Jewish communities and more Jewish homes. G-d said He will bring them from all corners of the earth. He did. Our job is to secure Israel. Be strong and of good courage. Walk humbly in G-ds ways and you will be safe and secure. Shanah tovah Pg 2 Features: 2 T he Rabbi's Confession 8-9 Religious School & Library 3-4 President's M essage 10 D onations 5 A M essage from Lou 11-12 B-days & Yahrzeits 6-7 R itual Com m ittee 13-14 H igh H oly D ays President's Message ? Vikki Goldstein, Synagogue President Now I have one more tale to tell you of another friend of the four this is a sad sad tale of the death of a man called Someone Else; I recently sent out an email, and posted You see Everybody, Somebody, Anybody on Facebook, about multiple executive and Nobody all work at a firm and board positions coming open in and at this firm worked Someone Else.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 on Vayakhel Pekudei
    dispute cannot come from diametrically opposed logical positions. In other BS"D words, if one “person” says something makes sense, how can the disputant take the exact opposite point of view? In effect, Rav Dovid Kviat is asking, what happened to Moshe Rabbeinu To: [email protected] here? Moshe considers the mirrors repugnant — he is repelled by them — From: [email protected] while the Almighty finds them to be His favorite and most precious donation. How can that be? Moshe usually has a keen understanding of the Will of Hashem. After all, he was Moshe Rabbeinu! How could he be so off base here with his reaction to the mirrors? Rav Kviat answers that Moshe Rabbeinu was not off base. Moshe’s reaction was logical and totally understandable. However, Moshe Rabbeinu was INTERNET PARSHA SHEET missing a piece of information that the Holy One Blessed be He possessed. ON Vayakhel Pekudei - 5778 Moshe Rabbeinu, who was in Midyan at the time, had no way of knowing what happened in Egypt regarding the intimate relationships between the In our 23nd year! To receive this parsha sheet, go to http://www.parsha.net and click Jewish men and their wives. He had no way of knowing that the men were Subscribe or send a blank e-mail to [email protected] Please also hesitant to have children, and that their wives used these mirrors to copy me at [email protected] A complete archive of previous issues is now available at http://www.parsha.net It is also fully searchable. encourage their them.
    [Show full text]
  • Rav Aryeh Tzvi Frommer HY”D: סנגורם של ישראל
    Rav Aryeh Tzvi Frommer HY”D: סנגורם של ישראל סנגורם של ישראל :Rav Aryeh Tzvi Frommer HY”D A Closer Look At One of the Greatest Defenders of the Common Jew in Modern Times[1] Rosh Yeshiva of Yeshivat Chochmei Lublin, Av Beit Din of Kozoglov, Author of Responsa Eretz Tzvi, Siach Ha-Sadeh, Doreish Tov Le’amo[2] By Alon Amar ”הכל מלמדין זכות” – משנה סנהדרין ד:א In the fall of 1933, immediately after the death of Rabbi Meir Shapira zt”l – Rosh Yeshivat Chochmei Lublin, an article appeared in the “Lubliner Tugenblatt” newspaper. The title reads “Who will be the next Rosh Yeshiva?” The article references multiple distinguished candidates for the prestigious appointment, including Rav Menachem Zemba hy”d and Rav Dov Berish Weidenfeld zt”l –The Tchebiner Rav. Interestingly enough, the eventual successor to Rabbi Meir Shapira, was not even mentioned in the article, though his greatness in Torah learning and piety was on par with those aforementioned geonim. Rav Aryeh Tzvi Frommer Hy”d (RATF), also known as The Kozoglover Gaon, was chosen as the next Rosh Yeshiva of Yeshivat Chochmei Lublin and served at its helm until it’s closure during World War II. His unique legacy expanded beyond the four walls of the yeshiva where he inspired and taught students. Through his responsa he engaged real-life issues creatively defending many customs of questionable halachic standing and created the mishna yomi program allowing all Jews, both scholars and laymen, to complete the entirety of Torah Sheb’al peh. His preoccupation with the spiritual needs of the full spectrum of jewry, and the creativity he employed for this task remain defining hallmarks of his inspiring legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Reply from Haym Soloveitchik to the JQR Interview with Robert Brody
    Reply from Haym Soloveitchik to the JQR Interview with Robert Brody Reply from Haym Soloveitchik to the JQR Interview with Robert Brody By Haym Soloveitchik Editor’s Note: As a recap of a recent exchange between two scholars on a nuanced debate within medieval Jewish history (see the first footnote), we present this final note by Professor Haym Soloveitchik. Part One Dr. Robert Brody advances no new arguments against my thesis in his recent interview at the blog of the Jewish Quarterly Review (https://katz.sas.upenn.edu/blog/jewish-quarterly-review/jqr-c ontributor-conversation-robert-brody-origins-talmud-study). I have addressed all his points in my original essay and my reply in the Jewish Quarterly Review and online on my personal website.[1] The reader can judge for himself or herself whether my arguments are persuasive. Basically, the issue between us boils down to two points. Brody does not believe in historical implication. Two facts, to him, imply nothing. If so, all the scholar can ever have is a large pile of inert facts. For example, he denies the notion that Sura and Pumpeditha would never have surrendered their monopoly on the “Vox Talmudica,” for that “would have been institutional suicide.”[2] If that’s the case, all we can know of the past is what is explicitly stated in the sources of the past. Brody equally does not believe in probabilities (not even cumulative probabilities [3]). In the absence of probability (or improbability), all theories are equal. If one can believe that scores of scribes both educated and ignorant, with good or bad memories can inscribe a text of a million and a half words without any change in that text’s meaning,[4] then one can believe almost anything.
    [Show full text]