DOCSLIB.ORG

Digitally Fabricated LOW-COST HOUSING Material, Joint and Prototype

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Digitally Fabricated LOW-COST HOUSING Material, Joint and Prototype Department of Civil, Building and Environmental Engineering PhD in Architectural Engineering and Urban Planning Curriculum Building Architecture Cycle XXIX Doctoral Dissertation Digitally Fabricated LOW-COST HOUSING Material, Joint and Prototype By: Kareem Elsayed Supervisor Professor Antonio Fioravanti June 2017 ii Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Edile e Ambientale Dottorato in Ingegneria dell'Architettura e dell'Urbanistica Curriculum Edile Architettura XXIX ciclo Dottorato di Ricerca Fabbricazione Digitale nella produzione di ALLOGGI A BASSO COSTO Materiale, giunto e prototipo Da: Kareem Elsayed Supervisore Professore Antonio Fioravanti Giugno 2017 iii iv Contents Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................................... viii Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................................ xi 1 CHAPTER 1 | Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Problem definition ......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Research questions ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Aims and objectives ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Scope .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.6 Tools ..................................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.7 Thesis structure ........................................................................................................................................... 11 2 CHAPTER 2 | Background .................................................................................................................. 15 2.1 Where we come from? ............................................................................................................................... 16 2.2 Fundamental concepts .............................................................................................................................. 17 2.3 Types of prefabricated housing ............................................................................................................. 26 2.4 Mass customisation .................................................................................................................................... 30 2.5 Early precedents of architect-led prefabricated housing ........................................................... 33 2.6 Early precedents of industry-led prefabricated housing ............................................................ 39 2.7 From prefabrication to digital fabrication ........................................................................................ 41 3 CHAPTER 3 | Digitally Fabricated Housing Trends .................................................................. 53 3.1 Trend 1: Socially driven ............................................................................................................................ 54 3.2 Trend 2: Efficiency driven ........................................................................................................................ 60 3.3 Trend 3: Process driven ............................................................................................................................ 67 3.4 Where shall we head – Outlook and vision ....................................................................................... 72 4 CHAPTER 4 | Housing System Propositions ............................................................................... 75 v 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 76 4.2 Critical design considerations ................................................................................................................ 76 4.3 Design strategies .......................................................................................................................................... 84 4.4 “Housing System 01” components ....................................................................................................... 87 4.5 Material selection ........................................................................................................................................ 99 4.6 Characterising the material ................................................................................................................... 100 4.7 Initial verification of design system ................................................................................................... 115 4.8 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 119 5 CHAPTER 5 | Joinery Design ...........................................................................................................123 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 124 5.2 Wood joinery background ..................................................................................................................... 124 5.3 Jointing concept .......................................................................................................................................... 129 5.4 Detailed snap-fit joint design ................................................................................................................ 135 5.5 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 143 6 CHAPTER 6 | Fabrication and Testing full scale assemblies...............................................145 6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 146 6.2 Modeling the prototypes ........................................................................................................................ 146 6.3 Final milling ................................................................................................................................................. 150 6.4 Assembly sequence ................................................................................................................................... 152 6.5 Built prototypes ......................................................................................................................................... 153 6.6 Prototypes evaluation ............................................................................................................................. 155 7 CHAPTER 7 | Conclusions ................................................................................................................169 7.1 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 170 7.2 Results ............................................................................................................................................................ 171 7.3 Future outlook ............................................................................................................................................ 173 8 Appendix A | Detailed Mechanical Tests ...................................................................................185 vi 8.1 Material mechanical properties........................................................................................................... 185 9 Appendix B | ECOboard Commercial Data sheet ....................................................................207 vii Acknowledgments To my supervisor Prof. Antonio Fioravanti, Your patient guidance, encouragement and advice have been critical and indispensable throughout my time as your student. I have been extremely lucky to have a supervisor who cared so much about my work. In the downs before the ups, you were always there. To Professors Franco Bontempi and Salvatore Perno, This work could not have been done without your very generous help, dedication and close guidance throughout the mechanical and structural lab testing phase of the research. I would like also to extend my thanks to the staff of the Material Testing Lab of the department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering of La Sapienza. To my colleagues: Francesco Rossini and Francesco Squasi, I highly appreciate and value your help and availability. Your comments and feedback were always eye-openers and helped evolve the research further. To all my colleagues, Your presence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of House Types
    List of house types This is a list of house types. Houses can be built in a • Assam-type House: a house commonly found in large variety of configurations. A basic division is be- the northeastern states of India.[2] tween free-standing or Single-family houses and various types of attached or multi-user dwellings. Both may vary • Barraca: a traditional style of house originated in greatly in scale and amount of accommodation provided. Valencia, Spain. Is a historical farm house from the Although there appear to be many different types, many 12th century BC to the 19th century AD around said of the variations listed below are purely matters of style city. rather than spatial arrangement or scale. Some of the terms listed are only used in some parts of the English- • Barndominium: a type of house that includes liv- speaking world. ing space attached to either a workshop or a barn, typically for horses, or a large vehicle such as a recreational vehicle or a large recreational boat. 1 Detached single-unit housing • Bay-and-gable: a type of house typically found in the older areas of Toronto. Main article: Single-family detached home • Bungalow: any simple, single-storey house without any basement. • A-frame: so-called because of the appearance of • the structure, namely steep roofline. California Bungalow • Addison house: a type of low-cost house with metal • Cape Cod: a popular design that originated in the floors and cavity walls made of concrete blocks, coastal area of New England, especially in eastern mostly built in the United Kingdom and in Ireland Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Check Is in the Mail (And So Is the House): an Analysis of the Short-Lived Catalog Home Phenomenon
    University at Albany, State University of New York Scholars Archive Geography and Planning Honors College 1-2017 The Check is in the Mail (And so is the House): An Analysis of the Short-Lived Catalog Home Phenomenon Madison Caswell Squires University at Albany, State University of New York Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/honorscollege_gp Part of the Geography Commons Recommended Citation Squires, Madison Caswell, "The Check is in the Mail (And so is the House): An Analysis of the Short-Lived Catalog Home Phenomenon" (2017). Geography and Planning. 2. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/honorscollege_gp/2 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at Scholars Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geography and Planning by an authorized administrator of Scholars Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Check is in the Mail (And so is the House): An Analysis of the Short-Lived Catalog Home Phenomenon An honors thesis presented to the Department of Geography and Planning, University at Albany, State University of New York In partial fulfillment of the requirements For graduation with Honors in Geography and Urban Planning And Graduation from The Honors College. Madison Caswell Squires Research Advisor: John Pipkin, Ph.D. January, 2017 Abstract This thesis seeks to examine the concept of mail-order, “kit” housing, as pioneered at the beginning of the 20th century. Of primary focus will be the (then) new technologies and innovations having made this industry possible, as well as the marketing methods used in the concept’s advertisement.
    [Show full text]
  • House in a Box: Prefabricated Housing in the Jackson Purchase Cultural Landscape Region, 1900 to 1960
    House in a Box: Prefabricated Housing in the Jackson Purchase Cultural Landscape Region, 1900 to 1960 Written and designed by Cynthia E. Johnson Rachel Kennedy, Editor All photographs by the Kentucky Heritage Council, unless otherwise noted This publication was sponsored by the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet in coopera- tion with the Kentucky Heritage Council. The Kentucky Heritage Council, an agency of the Kentucky Commerce Cabinet, is the State Historic Preservation Offi ce. For more information about Heritage Council programs, please visit our website at http://www.heritage.ky.gov/ Table of Contents House in a Box: Prefabricated Housing in the Jackson Purchase Cultural Landscape Region, 1900 to 1960 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................. 4 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 5 Section I. Methodology ..................................................................................................... 9 Research Design.................................................................................................................. 9 Information Sources.......................................................................................................... 10 Issues with Fieldwork ....................................................................................................... 12 Section II. Domestic Prefabrication Historic Context ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Documentation of Kit Houses Manufactured by Sears
    THE KIT HOUSE IN SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA Architectural Documentation of Kit Houses Manufactured by Sears, Roebuck and Company Located within the Cities of Chesapeake, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Suffolk, and Virginia Beach, Virginia Prepared for: Virginia Department of Historic Resources and The Cities of Chesapeake, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Suffolk, and Virginia Beach Prepared by: William and Mary Center for Archaeological Research THE KIT HOUSE IN SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA Architectural Documentation of Kit Houses Manufactured by Sears, Roebuck and Company Located within the Cities of Chesapeake, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Suffolk, and Virginia Beach, Virginia WMCAR Project No. 05-35 PREPARED FOR: Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, Virginia AND The Cities of Chesapeake, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Suffolk, and Virginia Beach PREPARED BY: William and Mary Center for Archaeological Research The College of William and Mary P.O. Box 8795 Williamsburg, Virginia 23187-8795 AUTHOR: Meg Greene Malvasi PROJECT DIRECTOR: Joe B. Jones 2006 i ABSTRACT In the winter of 2005 and early spring of 2006, the William and Mary Center for Ar- chaeological Research conducted reconnaissance and intensive architectural surveys of properties in the Tidewater cities of Chesapeake, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Suffolk, and Virginia Beach. The goal of the project was to document houses built from kits manu- factured by Sears, Roebuck, and Company in the five cities. Limited to a total of 195 reconnaissance surveys and 10 intensive surveys, the study is by no means exhaustive. Instead, the results and interpretation are intended to provide a baseline of information about kit houses within the five participating Tidewater cities and form a foundation for future research on kit houses in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Calcasieu Parish
    YOUR GUIDE TO Historic Calcasieu Parish HISTORIC RESOURCES AND TOURS OF OUR UNIQUE CORNER OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES l SULPHUR l WESTLAKE l DEQUINCY l VINTON l IOWA 1 he fascinating heritage of Southwest Louisiana is yours to explore by using this guide to historic attractions and neighborhoods in Calcasieu Parish. This guide offers suggested routes and back stories of Southwest TLouisiana’s romantic, exotic, and exciting history. This is the place where the pirates met the cowboys, and where Cajuns, Creoles, German immigrants, Midwesterners and pioneers from the South and West met to build a community and a culture like no other. Many of the neighborhood tours are designed for walking. Park your car and walk to explore TABLE OF CONTENTS the architecture, gardens, birdlife and most especially, the people you’ll meet. INTRODUCTION 3-4 NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES IN CALCASIEU PARISH 5 Discover the distinct cultural neighborhoods of Calcasieu Parish. Absolutely free to explore are the Lakeside Promenade, 9-11 Memorial, Millennium Playground, and Bord du Lac Marina on HISTORIC LAKE CHARLES 7 the lake edge of the Lake Charles Civic Center grounds, all of the city and parish parks, historic cemeteries, Central School and the Historic 1911 City Hall in Lake Charles, as well as the Henning Cultural Center in Sulphur, and the Railroad Museum in DeQuincy. For other attractions, like the Mardi Gras Museum, special exhibitions, or the Imperial Calcasieu Museum, there is a nominal NEIGHBORHOOD TOURS charge to view their collections. For more information on Calcasieu Parish attractions and events, check out www.visitlakecharles.org ChARPENTIER HISTORIC DISTRICT TOUR 8-13 or follow us on Twitter or Facebook.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Studies Journal 2008
    University of Colorado Denver HISTORICAL STUDIES JOURNAL Spring 2008 . Volume 25 HISTORICAL STUDIES JOURNAL Spring 2008Spring WHY A KIT HOUSE? . The History of a Ranch House and its Restoration Along the Plum Creek Vol. 25 WORKING CLASS LEISURE and Holidays With Pay During the French Popular Front BOETTCHER MANSION THE GOLDA MEIR HOUSE: Museum, Conference Center, and Center for Political Leadership GEORGE CATLIN: Artist and Advocate of the American Indian PATRIOTIC UNION SONGS of the U.S. Civil War HISTORICAL STUDIES JOURNAL Spring 2008 . Volume 25 EDITOR: Annette Gray, Graduate Student EDITORIAL STAFF: Virginia Bennett, Graduate Student Lisa Crunk, Graduate Student Evelyn Waldron, Graduate Student Thomas J. Noel, Ph.D., Faculty Advisor DESIGNER: Shannon Fluckey Clicks! Copy & Printing Services Auraria Campus DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY University of Colorado Denver Myra Rich, Ph.D., Department Chair Marilynn Hitchens, Ph.D. U. S. Colonial, U. S. Early National, Modern Europe, World History Women and Gender, Immigration History Rebecca A. Hunt, Ph.D. American West, Gender, Museum Christopher Agee, Ph.D. Studies, Public History 20th Century U. S. History, Urban History, Social Movement History, Pamela Laird, Ph.D. History of Crime and Policing U. S. Social, Intellectual, Technology, Public History, Business Frederick S. Allen, Ph.D., Emeritus Modern Western Europe, France, Marjorie Levine-Clark, Ph.D. Germany Modern Britain, European Women and Gender, Medicine and Health Thomas Andrews, Ph.D. 19th and 20th Century U. S. History, Thomas J. Noel, Ph.D. Environment, Labor, Urban, Native American West, Art & Architecture, American, U. S. West, and History Public History & Preservation Education Carl Pletsch, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Shotgun House: a Study of Its Evolution and the Enduring Presence of the Vernacular in American Architecture
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Architecture Undergraduate Honors Theses Architecture 12-2012 The American Shotgun House: A Study of its Evolution and the Enduring Presence of the Vernacular in American Architecture Lillian McRae University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/archuht Part of the Architectural History and Criticism Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation McRae, Lillian, "The American Shotgun House: A Study of its Evolution and the Enduring Presence of the Vernacular in American Architecture" (2012). Architecture Undergraduate Honors Theses. 7. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/archuht/7 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Architecture at ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Architecture Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The American Shotgun House: A Study of its Evolution and the Enduring Presence of the Vernacular in American Architecture A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Honors Program of the Department of Architecture in the Fay Jones School of Architecture, University of Arkansas. Lillian Holcomb McRae Thesis Committee: Chair, Ethel Goodstein-Murphree, Ph.D. Member, Marlon Blackwell, M.Arch. Member, Kimball Erdman, M.L.A. Fall 2012 i © 2012 by Lillian Holcomb McRae All rights reserved. ii ACHNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend my sincere appreciation and gratitude to Dr. Ethel Goodstein- Murphree for her guidance, insight and encouragement throughout the research and writing process. I would also like to thank Kimball Erdman and Marlon Blackwell for their service on the committee as well as their input and commentary during the editorial process.
    [Show full text]
  • Apartment Bungalow and California-Type Houses of Arlington County, Virginia;
    NPS Form 10-900-b (Rev. 01/2009) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items XX New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing APARTMENT BUNGALOW AND CALIFORNIA-TYPE HOUSES OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA; VDHR FILE NUMBER 000-9712 B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) 1. THE APARTMENT BUNGALOW OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, 1938-1939 2. THE CALIFORNIA-TYPE HOUSE OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, 1946-1952 C. Form Prepared by Laura V. Trieschmann, Architectural Historian name/title organization EHT Traceries date August 2011 Updated November 2011 1121 Fifth Street, NW street & number telephone 202-393-1199 Washington DC city or town state zip code 20001 e-mail [email protected] D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lafayette Historic Register
    Colorized photo of Lafayette’s Jefferson Street taken in the 1920s. Photo is provided courtesy of Louis J. Perret, Lafayette Parish Clerk of Court. A Brief History of Acadiana Before European influence, Acadiana’s population consisted mainly of the indigenous Ishak (Atakapa), Chahta (Choctaw), and Sitimaxa (Chitimacha) peoples. It was not until 1541 that the first people of the lower Mississippi Delta region first encountered Europeans in any noticeable number. European influence was still negligible until 1682 when France colonized Louisiana under King Louis XIV, and even after another 100 years, the population of European settlers remained small. However, by 1720, South Louisiana had became home to small groups of Spanish, French, and English working as ranchers, trappers or traders. Europeans named the region using the Choctaw word for the Ishak inhabitants, which was Atakapa. By 1800, the two largest population groups were French refugees from Nova Scotia, now called Acadians, (also called Cajuns), and enslaved Africans. Acadians were brought to Southwest Louisiana to clear and cultivate the fertile river- bottom land. Some were given Spanish land grants to cultivate the land along the various rivers, bayous, and lakes. At the same time, Africans were brought to the Atakapa Region to be sold into slavery for work on Louisiana farms and plantations. For several decades, the Catholic Acadians, deported by the British, made up the largest European-heritage population. Additional French and other Europeans settled in the Atakapa Region in greater numbers after 1785. With the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, “Des Americans” began to settle in the Atakapa Region, and significant numbers of other Europeans began to arrive between 1820 and 1870; Germans searched for affordable land, Irish wished to escape famine, and more French citizens fled from religious persecution.
    [Show full text]
  • CORDARY FAMILY RESIDENCE and PACIFIC READY-CUT COTTAGE 1828-1830 South Gramercy Place CHC-2018-1371-HCM ENV-2018-1372-CE
    CORDARY FAMILY RESIDENCE AND PACIFIC READY-CUT COTTAGE 1828-1830 South Gramercy Place CHC-2018-1371-HCM ENV-2018-1372-CE Agenda packet includes: 1. Final Determination Staff Recommendation Report 2. City Council Motion 18-0141 3. Commission/ Staff Site Inspection Photos—March 29, 2018 4. Categorical Exemption 5. Historic-Cultural Monument Application Please click on each document to be directly taken to the corresponding page of the PDF. Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC-2018-1371-HCM ENV-2018-1372-CE HEARING DATE: May 3, 2018 Location: 1828-1830 South Gramercy Place TIME: 10:00 AM Council District: 10 - Wesson PLACE: City Hall, Room 1010 Community Plan Area: South Los Angeles 200 N. Spring Street Area Planning Commission: South Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA 90012 Neighborhood Council: United Neighborhoods of the Historic Arlington Heights, West Adams and EXPIRATION DATE: May 20, 2018 Jefferson Park Legal Description: Angelus Vista Tract, Lot 72 PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the CORDARY FAMILY RESIDENCE AND PACIFIC READY-CUT COTTAGE REQUEST: Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument OWNERS: Advanced Properties, LLC Yvonne Perkins 232 South Wetherly Drive 1580 Old House Road Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Pasadena, CA 91107 APPLICANT: City of Los Angeles 221 North Figueroa Street, Suite 1350 Los Angeles, CA 90012 PREPARER: Laura Meyers 1818 South Gramercy Place Los Angeles, CA 90019 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Declare the subject property a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Landmark Assessment Report
    Landmark Assessment Report Date: July 9, 2020 For: Stephanie Reich, Design and Historic Preservation Planner Subject: 1626 California Avenue From: Amanda Duane, Associate Architectural Historian _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Executive Summary The property at 1626 California Avenue is occupied by a single-family residence that was moved to its present location in 1923. The property was most recently identified in the 2018 Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) Update as appearing eligible for recognition as a Structure of Merit for representing the development history of the Wilshire Montana and Mid-City neighborhoods in Santa Monica. The current property owner filed a Demolition Application with the City of Santa Monica (City) in October 2019 to replace windows totaling more than 25% of the street-facing wall. As part of the interim demolition permit review process for properties over 40 years of age, the Landmarks Commission moved at an initial hearing on February 10, 2020 that there was credible evidence in the record for a second hearing. As a result, GPA Consulting (GPA) has been retained by the City of Santa Monica (City) to prepare this Landmark Assessment Report to determine if the property is eligible for designation, and if so, under which criteria. GPA evaluated the property under the six Santa Monica Landmark criteria as well as the Structure of Merit criteria. As a result of this analysis, GPA concludes that the property does not appear to be significant under any local criteria, and therefore does not appear to be eligible for designation as a Santa Monica Landmark. The subject building does not appear to merit recognition as a Structure of Merit either.
    [Show full text]