Craniometric, Serological, and Dermatoglyphic Approaches Miyo Yokota University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-1997 Biological Relationships among Siberians: Craniometric, Serological, and Dermatoglyphic Approaches Miyo Yokota University of Tennessee, Knoxville Recommended Citation Yokota, Miyo, "Biological Relationships among Siberians: Craniometric, Serological, and Dermatoglyphic Approaches. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 1997. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4032 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Miyo Yokota entitled "Biological Relationships among Siberians: Craniometric, Serological, and Dermatoglyphic Approaches." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Anthropology. Richard L. Jantz, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: William M. Bass, Lyle M. Konigsberg, Christine R. Boake, Murray K. Marks Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Miyo Yokota entitled "Biological Relationships among Siberians: Craniometric, Serological, and Dermatoglyphic Approaches." I have examined the final copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Anthropology. --·-··--·� tz, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Accepted for the Council: Associate Vice Chancellor and Dean of The Graduate School Biological Relationships Among Siberians: Craniometric, Serological, and Dermatoglyphic Approaches A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Miyo Yokota August 1997 copyright c Miya Yokota, 1997 All rights reserved ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my parents Mr. Tadao Yokota and Mrs. Kazuko Yokota who have given me opportunities to see the world iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Richard Jantz, for his support, guidance, and patience. I learned a lot from him: research, wisdom, bicycling, and most of all, just "keep going" when obstacles are encountered. I would also like to thank other committee members in the Anthropology Department, Dr. William Bass, who would always talk to me in the hallway to see how I am doing; Dr. Murray Marks, who was patient and kind enough to go over the revisions of this dissertation with me; and Dr. Lyle Konigsberg, who "nicely" gave me critical comments on my papers including this dissertation and taught me the whole shebang of American slang and idioms. My appreciation goes to Dr. Christine Boake in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, who kindly agreed to be one of my committee members. This dissertation would not have been not completed without the generosity and assistance of the following people: Dr. Michael Crawford at the University of Kansas, Ors. Hajime Ishida, Kunihiko Morita, and Ei Ikeda at the Sapporo Medical School, Japan, and Dr. W.W. Howells at the Harvard University. I am extremely grateful to them. I would like to thank Drs. Jan Simek, Steve Ousley, and Jim Kidder who cheered me up when I had a hard time as well as provided critical comments on some chapters in this dissertation. iv My appreciation also goes to the Department secretaries in Anthropology, Pam Poe, Donna Patton, and Charlene Weaver, for their help in taking messages and word processing. Lastly, I like to thank my parents and all my friends who are always there for me with their love, support, and encouragement throughout the long journey of graduate schools. V ABSTRACT Siberian people, residing in the wide range bounded by the Urals to the West, Beringia to the East, Mongolia to the South, and Arctic to the North, form an important link between Asia, Europe and people in the New World. However, biological contribution of Siberians to Asians, Europeans and people in the New World were not sufficiently studied until recently. Previous extensive Siberian studies were mainly conducted by Russians and Japanese researchers, most of whom agreed that Siberians were clearly classified by typology. However, their typology is problematic when explaining tribes i.e., Evenks and Evens, who are exchanging genes and culture with their neighbors. Previous studies also contain problems such as methodology and lack of data especially for westerners because of political barriers between the U.S. and Russia. This study attempts to reveal biological relationships among Siberians. The extensive data, including 647 crania, more than 3000 fingerprints, and over 340 blood samples, are available from the wide Siberian regions. Biological variation is evaluated with Fst, and biological patterning is summarized with UPGMA clusters and contour maps. Furthermore, matrix comparisons between geography and biological data sets are investigated with Mantel t-test. Siberian biological variation in this study shows low variation except for crania. High cranial variation may hav,e resulted from the selection of measurements, environmental vi influences, selection and genetic drift. Low variation in dermatolyphics and blood may have been related to less environmental effects, and nature or function of blood and dermatoglyphic systems which are used in this study. Siberian biological relationships are patterned primarily regionally and linguistically. Southern Siberian Altaic speakers, for instance, are biologically close to one another. Such regional and linguistic patterning matches Russian typology. However, this study also showed three forces of Siberian population structure, reflecting Siberian history: a north-south connection reflecting dispersions of occupants through prehistory, a west-east connection indicating the migration and diffusion of Bronze cultures, and east and west influences in the Baikal regions reflecting cultural and political influences. Such distributions and migration patterns were insufficiently demonstrated by previous typological studies. Significant correlations between geography and finger ridge counts, fingers and blood, crania and blood, as well as crania and finger ridge counts indicate a common N-S connection. Today, the investigation of origins and divergence of Siberians are more difficult due to heavy admixture with Russians and decrease of "pure" indigenous tribes. This study provides useful biological information of Siberian indigenous populations and their history. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I . INTRODUCTION • .. .. •• • . .. .• •• .. • . .. •• • . •. .. 1 Background and Statement of Problem ..•...•.•...•..... 1 New World-Siberian-Asia Connection ....•.....••....... 2 The Location and Typologies of Siberian Populations .. 3 Recent Siberian studies •••...•.•••.....•....••....... 7 Problems of the Siberian studies Completed to Date ... 8 This study •• • • • .. • •• . •• .. .. •• •• • . .. • •• . .. •. • . .. .• . 12 II. SUBSISTENCE PATTERNS AND CULTURES IN SIBERIA ........ 14 Siberian Populations .••..••..•.•.•••.........•...•.•• 14 Subsistence Patterns and Cultures of Siberia ••••..•.. 14 The Languages of Siberia .....•••••.•.•....••.•...•... 31 III. HISTORY OF SIBERIA ................................. 37 The Emergence and settlement of Siberians ••••....•... 37 Paleolithic Period .•...•.••.•••.•••••.••••.•••......• 37 Neolithic Period •••....•.•.••..••....•..•••.•••.••... 41 Bronze Age . •. •• • • . • .. .• . •• . .. .. •• .• •. .. •• . 45 Around the First Millennium B.C • ••.•....•••••••.••.•. 48 Around the First Millennium A. D. ..................... 52 After the First Millennium A. D. ...................... 56 IV. MATERIALS AND METHODS ............................... 60 Sampling Method .. • . •• . •• . •• • • .• • . •• • . •• • •. • . .• . 60 Samples •• • • • • •• •• • • • •• • • • •• • •• •• •• • • • • • •• •• • • •• • • •• • • 62 Data sources • . •. •• • . •. •• • • •• . • . •. •• . •• • •• . •• • . •. •• 6 6 statistical Method ••.••..•.•.••••.••........••.•..... 72 V. RESULTS .. • . .. .. •• . .. .. .• . •. .. .. • . .. .• • •. .. 81 Inter-population Variation •.....•...•.•.....•........ 81 Population Relationships ....•.•.•.•..••••...•..•...•. 84 Correlation between Geographical and Biological Distances •••....•......••...... 116 viii VI. DISCUSSION .• .• .. • • • • . .. • .. •• • .. .. • . •. .. • 119 Biological Variation in Siberia (Fst) ......•.•......• 119 Siberian Population Relationships •..•.•.........•.... 125 Correlation between Geography and Biological Distances •..•.•.•.••.••••••.••. 135 VII. CONCLUSION •••...•••.•..•••....•••.•...•••.•••.••..• 138 REFERENCES .• .. .. •• • . •• • • . • .. •. •• • .. • . .. .. •• . •• . 140 APPENDICES . • . • . • . • • . • . • . • . • . • . • • . • . 158 APPENDIX A: Dist�nce Ma�ri� from Geography ..•••.•.•.• 159 APPENDIX B: Cranial Variation •..••••...•••••.•••••..• 162 APPENDIX C: Serological Data Summary .•••..•••••..•.•.