DOCSLIB.ORG

The Call of the Godwit an Exploration of Birds and Farmers in a Landscape of Loss

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Call of the Godwit an Exploration of Birds and Farmers in a Landscape of Loss Sjoerd Vredenbregt The Call of the Godwit An Exploration of Birds and Farmers in a Landscape of Loss Master’s thesis in Global Environmental History 2 Abstract Vredenbregt, S.J.C. 2019. The Call of the Godwit – An Exploration of Birds and Farmers in a Landscape of Loss. Uppsala, Department of Archaeology and Ancient History. The lives of black-tailed godwits and farmers in the meadow landscapes of the Netherlands are closely entangled. While godwits and other ‘meadow birds’ have lived in around the hu- man shaped meadows for many centuries and, especially in the first half of the 20th century, profited from farming practices, from the second half of the 20th century, their populations started to decline rapidly. Based on studies to the ecology and ethology of godwits, and inter- views with farmers that work to save godwits and other birds on their land, this thesis explores the relationship between godwits and farmers situated in the meadow landscape through lively ethographic storytelling. Storytelling is a powerful method because it leaves open for multiple perspectives, without privileging the one over the other. Through this approach I aim to tell the stories of godwits and farmers alongside each other, in a way that gives individuals agency and presents their lives as meaningful. Through these stories I hope to engage readers with, and (re)connect them to, the lives of godwits and farmers and open up to a ‘capacity for re- sponse’. Keywords: black-tailed godwit, meadow birds, agriculture, multispecies studies, lively ethog- raphy, flight ways, storytelling, landscape, conservation. Master’s thesis in Global Environmental History (60 credits), supervisor: Anneli Ekblom, De- fended and approved spring term 2019-06-05. © Sjoerd Vredenbregt Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University, Box 626, 75126 Upp- sala, Sweden. 3 Acknowledgements I am thankful to everyone who supported me in the process of writing this thesis, or in the explorative journey that preceded, ultimately leading up to this thesis. In particular I like to thank Anneli Ekblom, who, as my supervisor has given me the freedom to discover and deepen my interests in writing this thesis. Also my study friends have helped me a lot in var- ious ways and studying with them almost every day has made this year very enjoyable. I am also very grateful to the interviewees presented in this text for donating their time and shar- ing their fascinating stories. Lastly, I thank my parents, for their unconditional love and sup- port during my Swedish adventure and their continuous interest in my studies, godwits and farmers. 4 Birds have a way of weaving themselves into space, with their calls and their cries: a quotidian givenness that can make their disappearance shocking, difficult to absorb, unthinkable. Hugo Reinert, 2018 5 Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 8 1.1. Storying entangled multispecies histories .................................................................................. 9 1.1.1. Lively ethography ............................................................................................................... 9 1.1.2. Bird migration throUgh hUman eyes ................................................................................. 10 1.2. Black-tailed godwits ................................................................................................................. 11 1.3. Farmers ..................................................................................................................................... 13 2. Situating the landscape .................................................................................................................... 15 2.1. Towards a godwit ‘El Dorado’ ................................................................................................. 15 2.1.1. Cultivating the land .......................................................................................................... 15 2.1.2. Fertilising the land ............................................................................................................ 17 2.2. Rationalising the landscape ...................................................................................................... 19 2.2.1. Mechanising milk ............................................................................................................. 22 2.3. Ways of farming in a productionist agriculture ....................................................................... 23 3. Sky Shepherds .................................................................................................................................. 27 3.1. Flyways .................................................................................................................................... 27 3.1.1. Evolutionary paths ............................................................................................................ 27 3.1.2. Skyward ............................................................................................................................ 29 3.2. In the meadows ........................................................................................................................ 31 3.2.1. Welcomed by farmers ....................................................................................................... 31 3.2.2. Breeding ........................................................................................................................... 31 3.2.3. Nesting .............................................................................................................................. 32 3.2.4. Growing a new generation ................................................................................................ 33 3.2.5. Departure .......................................................................................................................... 35 4. Loss of godwits in a ruptured landscape .......................................................................................... 36 4.1. Setting the debate ..................................................................................................................... 36 4.2. Ecologists as spokespeople ...................................................................................................... 37 4.2.1. Rendering godwits visible ................................................................................................ 37 4.2.2. Representing godwits politically ...................................................................................... 39 4.2. Farmers’ perspective ................................................................................................................ 41 5. Meadow bird farmers ....................................................................................................................... 44 5.1. Views on regular farming ......................................................................................................... 44 5.2. Agricultural landscape management ........................................................................................ 46 5.2.1. A farmers’ encounter with predation ................................................................................ 49 5.3. Seeking motivation ................................................................................................................... 50 6. Botes’ oase ....................................................................................................................................... 52 7. Aukes’ transition .............................................................................................................................. 58 7.1. Composing with the land ......................................................................................................... 58 7.2 Opening up the land .................................................................................................................. 61 8. Discussion ........................................................................................................................................ 62 8.1. Storying the landscape ............................................................................................................. 62 8.2. Participants in godwit loss ....................................................................................................... 63 6 8.3. Experimenting in response ....................................................................................................... 64 8.4. Resonating calls ....................................................................................................................... 65 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................................ 66 Interviews ........................................................................................................................................ 71 7 1. Introduction For many people in the Netherlands, especially in the rural areas, black-tailed godwits are the heralds of spring. Their arrival in the meadows symbolises how the landscape comes back to life after winter. Even for me, spending most of my life in Dutch cities, the arrival of black- tailed godwits (hereafter just ‘godwits’) is magical. Their return feels like a combination
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Population Analysis and Community Workshop for Far Eastern Curlew Conservation Action in Pantai Cemara, Desa Sungai Cemara – Jambi
    POPULATION ANALYSIS AND COMMUNITY WORKSHOP FOR FAR EASTERN CURLEW CONSERVATION ACTION IN PANTAI CEMARA, DESA SUNGAI CEMARA – JAMBI Final Report Small Grant Fund of the EAAFP Far Eastern Curlew Task Force Iwan Febrianto, Cipto Dwi Handono & Ragil S. Rihadini Jambi, Indonesia 2019 The aim of this project are to Identify the condition of Far Eastern Curlew Population and the remaining potential sites for Far Eastern Curlew stopover in Sumatera, Indonesia and protect the remaining stopover sites for Far Eastern Curlew by educating the government, local people and community around the sites as the effort of reducing the threat of habitat degradation, habitat loss and human disturbance at stopover area. INTRODUCTION The Far Eastern Curlew (Numenius madagascariencis) is the largest shorebird in the world and is endemic to East Asian – Australian Flyway. It is one of the Endangered migratory shorebird with estimated global population at 38.000 individual, although a more recent update now estimates the population at 32.000 (Wetland International, 2015 in BirdLife International, 2017). An analysis of monitoring data collected from around Australia and New Zealand (Studds et al. in prep. In BirdLife International, 2017) suggests that the species has declined much more rapidly than was previously thought; with an annual rate of decline of 0.058 equating to a loss of 81.7% over three generations. Habitat loss occuring as a result of development is the most significant threat currently affecting migratory shorebird along the EAAF (Melville et al. 2016 in EAAFP 2017). Loss of habitat at critical stopover sites in the Yellow Sea is suspected to be the key threat to this species and given that it is restricted to East Asian - Australasian Flyway, the declines in the non-breeding are to be representative of the global population.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List
    Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List The target species list (species to be surveyed) should not change over the course of the study, therefore determining the target species list is an important project design task. Because waterbirds, including shorebirds, can occur in very high numbers in a census area, it is often not possible to count all species without compromising the quality of the survey data. For the basic shorebird census program (protocol 1), we recommend counting all shorebirds (sub-Order Charadrii), all raptors (hawks, falcons, owls, etc.), Common Ravens, and American Crows. This list of species is available on our field data forms, which can be downloaded from this site, and as a drop-down list on our online data entry form. If a very rare species occurs on a shorebird area survey, the species will need to be submitted with good documentation as a narrative note with the survey data. Project goals that could preclude counting all species include surveys designed to search for color-marked birds or post- breeding season counts of age-classed bird to obtain age ratios for a species. When conducting a census, you should identify as many of the shorebirds as possible to species; sometimes, however, this is not possible. For example, dowitchers often cannot be separated under censuses conditions, and at a distance or under poor lighting, it may not be possible to distinguish some species such as small Calidris sandpipers. We have provided codes for species combinations that commonly are reported on censuses. Combined codes are still species-specific and you should use the code that provides as much information as possible about the potential species combination you designate.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Shorebird Profiles
    List of Shorebird Profiles Pacific Central Atlantic Species Page Flyway Flyway Flyway American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) •513 American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana) •••499 Black-bellied Plover (Pluvialis squatarola) •488 Black-necked Stilt (Himantopus mexicanus) •••501 Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani)•490 Buff-breasted Sandpiper (Tryngites subruficollis) •511 Dowitcher (Limnodromus spp.)•••485 Dunlin (Calidris alpina)•••483 Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemestica)••475 Killdeer (Charadrius vociferus)•••492 Long-billed Curlew (Numenius americanus) ••503 Marbled Godwit (Limosa fedoa)••505 Pacific Golden-Plover (Pluvialis fulva) •497 Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa)••473 Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres)•••479 Sanderling (Calidris alba)•••477 Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus)••494 Spotted Sandpiper (Actitis macularia)•••507 Upland Sandpiper (Bartramia longicauda)•509 Western Sandpiper (Calidris mauri) •••481 Wilson’s Phalarope (Phalaropus tricolor) ••515 All illustrations in these profiles are copyrighted © George C. West, and used with permission. To view his work go to http://www.birchwoodstudio.com. S H O R E B I R D S M 472 I Explore the World with Shorebirds! S A T R ER G S RO CHOOLS P Red Knot (Calidris canutus) Description The Red Knot is a chunky, medium sized shorebird that measures about 10 inches from bill to tail. When in its breeding plumage, the edges of its head and the underside of its neck and belly are orangish. The bird’s upper body is streaked a dark brown. It has a brownish gray tail and yellow green legs and feet. In the winter, the Red Knot carries a plain, grayish plumage that has very few distinctive features. Call Its call is a low, two-note whistle that sometimes includes a churring “knot” sound that is what inspired its name.
    [Show full text]
  • Black-Tailed Godwits in West African Winter Staging Areas
    Alterra is part of the international expertise organisation Wageningen UR (University & Research centre). Our mission is ‘To explore the potential of nature to improve the quality of life’. Within Wageningen UR, nine research institutes – both specialised and applied – have joined forces with Wageningen University and Van Hall Larenstein University of Black-tailed Godwits in West African winter Applied Sciences to help answer the most important questions in the domain of healthy food and living environment. With approximately 40 locations (in the Netherlands, Brazil and China), 6,500 members of staff and 10,000 students, Wageningen UR is one of the leading organisations in its domain worldwide. The integral approach to problems and the cooperation between the exact sciences and the technological and social disciplines are at the heart of the staging areas Wageningen Approach. Alterra is the research institute for our green living environment. We offer a combination of practical and scientific Habitat use and hunting-related mortality research in a multitude of disciplines related to the green world around us and the sustainable use of our living environment, such as flora and fauna, soil, water, the environment, geo-information and remote sensing, landscape and spatial planning, man and society. Alterra Report 2058 ISSN 1566-7197 More information: www.alterra.wur.nl/uk David Kleijn, Jan van der Kamp, Hamilton Monteiro, Idrissa Ndiaye, Eddy Wymenga and Leo Zwarts Black-tailed Godwits in West African winter staging areas Commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Conservation and Food safety, Direction Nature Conservation. Carried out in the framework of project BO-10-003-002.
    [Show full text]
  • Migratory Shorebird Guild
    Migratory Shorebird Guild Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Sanderling Calidris alba Semipalmated Plover Charadrius semipalmatus Red Knot Calidris canutus Black-bellied Plover Pluvialis squatarola Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa American Golden Plover Pluvialis dominica Buff-breasted Sandpiper Tryngites subruficollis Wimbrel Numenius phaeopus White-rumped Sandpiper Calidris fuscicollis Long-billed Curlew Numenius americanus Pectoral Sandpiper Calidris melanotos Greater Yellowlegs Tringa melanoleuca Purple Sandpiper Calidris maritima Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes Stilt Sandpiper Calidris himantopus Solitary Sandpiper Tringa solitaria Wilson’s Snipe Gallinago gallinago delicata Spotted Sandpiper Actitis macularia American Avocet Recurvirostra Americana Upland Sandpiper Bartramia longicauda Least Sandpiper Calidris minutilla Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris pusilla Short-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus Western Sandpiper Calidris mauri Long-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus scolopaceus Dunlin Calidris alpina Contributors: Felicia Sanders and Thomas M. Murphy DESCRIPTION Photograph by SC DNR Taxonomy and Basic Description The migratory shorebird guild is composed of birds in the Charadrii suborder. Migrants in South Carolina represent three families: Scolopacidae (sandpipers), Charadriidae (plovers) and Recurvirostridae (avocets). Sandpipers are the most diverse family of shorebirds. Their tactile foraging strategy encompasses probing in soft mud or sand for invertebrates. Plovers are medium size birds, with relatively short, thick bills and employ a distinctive foraging strategy. They stand, looking for prey and then run to feed on detected invertebrates. Avocets are large shorebirds with long recurved bills and partial webbing between the toes. They feed employing both tactile and visual methods. Shorebirds are characterized by long legs for wading and wings designed for quick flight and transcontinental migrations. Migrations can span continents; for example, red knots migrate from the Canadian arctic to the southern tip of South America.
    [Show full text]
  • Biometrics and Breeding Phenology of Terek Sandpipers in the Pripyat’ Valley, S Belarus
    54 Wader Study Group Bulletin Biometrics and breeding phenology of Terek Sandpipers in the Pripyat’ Valley, S Belarus NATALIA KARLIONOVA1, MAGDALENA REMISIEWICZ2, PAVEL PINCHUK1 1Institute of Zoology, Belarussian National Academy of Sciences, Academichnaya Str. 27, 220072 Minsk, Belarus. [email protected] 2Avian Ecophysiology Unit, Dept of Vertebrate Ecology and Zoology, Univ. of Gdansk, al. Legionów 9, 80-441 Gdansk, Poland. [email protected] Karlionova, N., Remisiewicz, M. & Pinchuk, P. 2006. Biometrics and breeding phenology of Terek Sandpipers in the Pripyat’ Valley, S Belarus. Wader Study Group Bull. 110: 54–58. Keywords: Terek Sandpiper, Xenus cinereus, biometrics, breeding phenology, Pripyat’ Valley, Belarus We present data on the breeding phenology and biometrics of Terek Sandpipers from the isolated westernmost population in the Pripyat’ river valley, S Belarus, close to the border with Ukraine. Studies were conducted on floodplain islands between the beginning of April and mid-July during 1996–1999 and 2002–2006. Over the years, the first arrivals appeared during 10–26 April (median 14 April), first eggs were laid during 24 April to 5 May (median 30 April) and the latest egg was laid on 25 May, first chicks hatched during 19 May to 1 June (median 25 May) and the first fledged juveniles were caught on 23 June. We present biometric data for juve- niles (at the post-fledging stage) and adults. The mean wing length of juveniles, just before departure from the breeding grounds in mid June, reached 96% of that of adults. Juvenile total head lengths were 91% of adult, and bill and nalospi lengths 85% of adult, but tarsus and tarsus plus toe lengths were the same as adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Migratory Birds Initiative Red Knot, a Priority Knot, Red Species for AMBI 2015-2019
    Arctic Migratory Birds Initiative Red knot, a priorityRed species for AMBI 2015-2019. Arendal Prokosch/UNEP-GRID Peter Photo: Arctic Migratory Birds Initiative (AMBI): protecting Arctic lifestyles and peoples through migratory bird conservation is a project designed to improve the status and secure the long-term sustainability of rapidly declining Arctic breeding migratory bird populations. AMBI has developed the Arctic Migratory Birds Initiative Work Plan 2015-2019 to identify priorities and guide actions. Circumpolar Ivory gull • Thick-billed murre • Steller’s eider • Common eider • Long-tailed duck • Snowy owl Americas African-Eurasian Red knot • Semipalmated sandpiper Black-tailed godwit • Bar-tailed godwit • Dunlin • Lesser white-fronted goose • Red knot AMBI works across four major flyways. East Asian-Australasian Each flyway has a series of priority conservation issues and species to Spoon-billed sandpiper • Great knot • Bar-tailed godwit address. • Lesser white-fronted goose • Dunlin • Red knot • The Arctic Council AMBI implementation AMBI responds to the To conserve declining Ministers welcomed will help governments Arctic Biodivesrity bird populations AMBI the AMBI Work Plan meet commitments Assessment welcomes support in the 2015 Arctic under Multilateral recommendation to and collaboration Council Iqaluit Environmental protect migratory with Arctic Council Declaration. Agreements (MEAs) at species range-wide Observers, non- global and hemispheric during the whole year. Arctic States, and levels. international partners. Priority AMBI Conservation Actions and Species Important breeding and staging sites for Spoon-billed Sandpiper, Spoon-billed Sandpiper, a priority species for AMBI 2015-2019. Photo: Jochen Dierschke Bar-tailed Godwit and Dunlin need to be identified and protectedin Arctic Alaska and Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • 54971 GPNC Shorebirds
    A P ocket Guide to Great Plains Shorebirds Third Edition I I I By Suzanne Fellows & Bob Gress Funded by Westar Energy Green Team, The Nature Conservancy, and the Chickadee Checkoff Published by the Friends of the Great Plains Nature Center Table of Contents • Introduction • 2 • Identification Tips • 4 Plovers I Black-bellied Plover • 6 I American Golden-Plover • 8 I Snowy Plover • 10 I Semipalmated Plover • 12 I Piping Plover • 14 ©Bob Gress I Killdeer • 16 I Mountain Plover • 18 Stilts & Avocets I Black-necked Stilt • 19 I American Avocet • 20 Hudsonian Godwit Sandpipers I Spotted Sandpiper • 22 ©Bob Gress I Solitary Sandpiper • 24 I Greater Yellowlegs • 26 I Willet • 28 I Lesser Yellowlegs • 30 I Upland Sandpiper • 32 Black-necked Stilt I Whimbrel • 33 Cover Photo: I Long-billed Curlew • 34 Wilson‘s Phalarope I Hudsonian Godwit • 36 ©Bob Gress I Marbled Godwit • 38 I Ruddy Turnstone • 40 I Red Knot • 42 I Sanderling • 44 I Semipalmated Sandpiper • 46 I Western Sandpiper • 47 I Least Sandpiper • 48 I White-rumped Sandpiper • 49 I Baird’s Sandpiper • 50 ©Bob Gress I Pectoral Sandpiper • 51 I Dunlin • 52 I Stilt Sandpiper • 54 I Buff-breasted Sandpiper • 56 I Short-billed Dowitcher • 57 Western Sandpiper I Long-billed Dowitcher • 58 I Wilson’s Snipe • 60 I American Woodcock • 61 I Wilson’s Phalarope • 62 I Red-necked Phalarope • 64 I Red Phalarope • 65 • Rare Great Plains Shorebirds • 66 • Acknowledgements • 67 • Pocket Guides • 68 Supercilium Median crown Stripe eye Ring Nape Lores upper Mandible Postocular Stripe ear coverts Hind Neck Lower Mandible ©Dan Kilby 1 Introduction Shorebirds, such as plovers and sandpipers, are a captivating group of birds primarily adapted to live in open areas such as shorelines, wetlands and grasslands.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax Rusticola
    Key concepts of Article 7(4): Version 2008 Species no. 50: Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax rusticola Distribution: The Eurasian Woodcock has an extensive Palaearctic distribution. It breeds from the Azores and Ireland to the pacific coast of Russia. Birds winter in Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, India and Southeast Asia to Japan. In Europe breeding occurs from Fennoscandia and Russia to the Mediterranean basin and the Canary Islands. Movements: Breeding populations in western maritime countries are sedentary, whilst those elsewhere are migratory. Scandinavian populations move southwest to winter mainly in Britain and France. Finnish birds move mainly south and winter mostly in Italy and the Balkans. Autumn movements start after the onset of frosts. Birds from the large Russian population are recorded wintering across most of West and Central Europe. The majority of birds are in their winter quarters by November but further (sometimes large scale) movements may occur in response to cold weather. Return migration starts in February in the Mediterranean region and the first half of March elsewhere. Population size and trends: The Woodcock is a difficult bird to count accurately. The European breeding population is estimated at 1,800,000 – 6,600,000 pairs of which 1,200,000 - 5,000,000 breeds in Russia (BirdLife Int. 2004A). The EU 27 population is estimated at 460,000 - 1,500,000 pairs (BirdLife Int. 2004A, 2004B). During 1990-2000 trends were stable across most of its European range, but declining in its Russian stronghold resulting in an overall moderate decline in Europe (>10%) (BirdLife Int. 2004A). Biological and behavioural aspects: Breeding: clutch size is usually 4 eggs (2-5); incubation 21-24 days; fledging period 15-20 days but sometimes able to get off ground at 10 days; independence: 5-6 weeks after hatching; brood: normally one brood.
    [Show full text]
  • Shorebird Habitat Conservation Strategy
    Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Region Joint Venture Shorebird Habitat Conservation Strategy May 2007 1 Shorebird Strategy Committee and Members of the Joint Venture Science Team Bob Gates, Ohio State University, Chair Dave Ewert, The Nature Conservancy Diane Granfors, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bob Russell, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bradly Potter, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mark Shieldcastle, Ohio Department of Natural Resources Greg Soulliere, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cover: Long-billed Dowitcher. Photo by Gary Kramer. i Table of Contents Plan Summary................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements...................................................................................................... 2 Background and Context ................................................................................................. 3 Population Status and Trends ......................................................................................... 6 Habitat Characteristics .................................................................................................. 11 Biological Foundation..................................................................................................... 14 Planning Framework.................................................................................................. 14 Migration and Distribution........................................................................................ 15 Limiting
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Population Decline in Migratory Shorebirds Relying on Yellow Sea Tidal Mudflats As Stopover Sites
    ARTICLE Received 12 Apr 2016 | Accepted 9 Feb 2017 | Published 13 Apr 2017 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14895 OPEN Rapid population decline in migratory shorebirds relying on Yellow Sea tidal mudflats as stopover sites Colin E. Studds1,2,3, Bruce E. Kendall4, Nicholas J. Murray1,5, Howard B. Wilson1, Danny I. Rogers6, Robert S. Clemens1, Ken Gosbell7, Chris J. Hassell8, Rosalind Jessop9, David S. Melville10, David A. Milton11, Clive D.T. Minton7, Hugh P. Possingham1,12, Adrian C. Riegen13, Phil Straw14, Eric J. Woehler15 & Richard A. Fuller1 Migratory animals are threatened by human-induced global change. However, little is known about how stopover habitat, essential for refuelling during migration, affects the population dynamics of migratory species. Using 20 years of continent-wide citizen science data, we assess population trends of ten shorebird taxa that refuel on Yellow Sea tidal mudflats, a threatened ecosystem that has shrunk by 465% in recent decades. Seven of the taxa declined at rates of up to 8% per year. Taxa with the greatest reliance on the Yellow Sea as a stopover site showed the greatest declines, whereas those that stop primarily in other regions had slowly declining or stable populations. Decline rate was unaffected by shared evolutionary history among taxa and was not predicted by migration distance, breeding range size, non-breeding location, generation time or body size. These results suggest that changes in stopover habitat can severely limit migratory populations. 1 School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 4072 Queensland, Australia. 2 Department of Geography and Environmental Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland 21250, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 O/O Criterium 28, 33 Actitis Hypoleucos, See Also Common
    Index 1o/o criterium 28, 33 133-139, 160, 161, 165, 167, 180, 192, 201, broad-billed sandpiper 244 Actitis hypoleucos, see also common sandpiper 29 202,205,216,224,233,265,280,281,293, brood patch 242, 252, 279 Actitis macularia, see also spotted sandpiper 286 296, 318, 328, 344 brood, of shellfish 23, 231, 236-239, 242, 252, adultery 283 Bay of Dakhla 12 257,258,273,279,287,289,293,295-298,334 AEWA, see African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement Bay of Fundy 12, 13, 15, 224 brooding, of chickens 242, 260, 296 African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement 342 Belgium 11, 233 Briinnich 27 air speed 100 benthic fauna 122, 124, 125, 323, 330, 332, 336 Buccinum undatum, see also whelk 329 Alaska SO, 54, 105, 144, 252, 273, 277 Berg River Estuary 125 buffer hypothesis 269 algae 11, 19, 20, 73, 179, 329, 330 Bijag6s Archipel 95, 124, 125, 137 bullfinch 169 ambient temperature 129, 155, 157, 208, 255, bill length 188, 195, 201, 202, 203, 225 Burry Inlet 313, 333 256,260 bill shapes 85 butterfly flight 281 Ameland 210, 340 biodiversity 334, 335, 342 calcium 17, 107, 156, 162, 173, 184, 188, 193 American black brent goose 29 biomass 21, 24, 122, 170, 175-177, 195,209-211, calcium, protective layer 184, 192 American golden plover 261 213,227,228,229,301,319,321,323,330, Calidris alba, see also sanderling 28, 46 American razor clam 21 332, 333 Calidris alpina, see also dunlin 28, SO amphipod, see also Corophium volutator 21-24, Black Sea 13, 68 Calidris canutus, see also red knot 28, 31, 44 119, 159, 166, 172, 173, 177, 181-184, 196, black-bellied brent goose
    [Show full text]