Far Eastern Curlew in Canada

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Far Eastern Curlew in Canada EXTRALIMITAL RECORD Far Eastern Curlew in Canada Figure 1. TheFar EasternCurlew' s call. "cur-lee, cur-lee." wasrepeated in rapid coupletsat 4- 5 secondintervals, reminiscentof the call of the Eurasian Curlew. Photos/Ervio Sian. The sighting of this Siberian speciesin British thousandsof peepsand othersandpipers Columbia provides a first record for continental eachyear during August and September, North America. and has a reputationfor harboringrar- ities.At approximately1700 PDT, Kau- tesk and Ireland sighteda large curlew W. DouglasKragh, Brian M. Kautesk, John Ireland and flyingoverhead and calling "cur-lee. cur- Ervio Sian lee" in rapid couplets.Both, who were familiar with the typical calls of the Long-billed Curlew (Numeniusameri- canus), which is a regular transient in that had been first reportedSeptember small numbers in the Vancouver area ber 24, 1984, the authors and 22. Mud Bay is a well-known shorebird (Campbellet al. 1974),commented that NseveralTHE AF•FERNOON other birders OFSEPTEM- were stagingarea near the mouths of the Ser- the calls sounded odd but resumed the searchingthe intertidal mudflats of Mud pentineand Nicomekl Rivers, 35 kilome- search for the Bar-tailed Godwit as the Bay, DeltaDistrict Municipality, British ters southeast of Vancouver. This loca- curlewflew northand disappeared. Columbia (49ø04'N,122ø55'W), for a tion hosts up to 2000 Black-bellied About one-half hour later the authors, Bar-tailedGodwit (Limosa lapponica), Plover(Pluvialis squatarola)and many alongwith B. Macdonald,A. Lau, G. Volume 40, Number I 13 British Columbia Provincial Museum, Victoria, and the National Museum of Canada, Ottawa. At thecrest of the eveningtide, shortly after sunset, after the curlew had flown off, the Bar-tailed Godwit (fifth British Columbia record), and two Hudsonian Godwits (Limosa haemastica), were foundroosting on the mudflatsamong a largeflock of Black-belliedPlovers. Despitea thoroughsearch of the area onthe following evening by morethan 40 birders,and searchesof lesser intensity on severalsubsequent days. the Far East- ern Curlew was never sightedagain. We consideredthe bird a juvenile Far EasternCurlew, sinceit had a relatively shortbill, seemedless heavily streaked belowthan adults,and had white tips on the firstto eighthprimaries (see Prater et al. 1977). The Far EasternCurlew is a large cur- lew similar in size to the Eurasian Cur- lew, the Far Eastern Curlew averaging 53-61 centimeters(20.8-24 inches) and the Eurasian Curlew 50-60 centimeters Figure 2. Observerswere searching through a concentrationof shorebirdsfor a Bar-tailed (19.6-23.6 inches) (Pizzey 1980 and Godwit when the curlew landed nearby. Crampetal. 1983),which incidentally is Arisell and G. Thomson, were searching In additionto the featuresalready dis- largerthan the 43 centimeters(17 inches) througha large concentrationof shore- cussed,the following field marks were givenfor theFar EasternCurlew in Scott birds when the curlew landed along the noted and compiled from the authors' (1983).Kiyosu (1959) hasexcellent pho- margin of a sandy spit 40-50 meters field notes. The head was brown with no tographsof both of thesespecies. away. Sian approachedthe curlew to stripes. heavily streaked and rather The callsof thesetwo speciesare noted within 15-20 meters and began taking blackishbrown on the posteriorfacial in severalreferences as being virtually photographs(Figs. I and 2), while the area. The underpartswere buffy white identical,the descriptionsmatching the other observerscontinued searching for with brown streaking,the streakingon rapid,uninflected "cur-lee, cur-lee" giv- thegodwit. The curlewcontinued calling the breastcontinuing up and becoming en by the Vancouverbird. This couplet and Ireland commented that the call re- finer on the throat and sides of the neck, wasgiven in seriesat approximately4-5 minded him of the Eurasian Curlew (N. thestreaking on thesides continued down second intervals. arquata),with whichhe wasvery famil- onto the flanks and became coarser. The Copiesof the photographstaken by iar from yearsof birdingin England. tail, uppertailcoverts and rump were Sianand field notesby the authorswere After 15-20 minutes the bird flew east brown, the tail barred with darker brown. forwarded to Dennis Paulson of the alongthe mudflats,circled overhead and The bill was stronglydecurved over its BurkeMuseum, University of Washing- landedonly 10-15 metersaway from the entirelength, the basalone-half of the ton, who reviewedthe descriptionsand observers.It wasat this pointthat we saw lower mandible pinkish flesh colored, comparedthe photographs to a specimen thatthe wing liningswere white, densely with the remainingtip of the lower man- of a juvenileFar EasternCurlew in the cross-barredwith brown streaking,and dible. the uppermandible and the legs museum'scollection, and photographs of contrastedstrongly with the buffyflanks. grayish-blue.Most noticeableon the twojuveniles in his possession. The rump and lower back were brown, standingbird was the pattern on the scap- A setof thephotographs was also com- the samecolor as the upperback. Since ulars and tertials. The feather centres paredwith specimens of FarEastern Cur- the Long-billed Curlew has cinnamon weredark blackishbrown, scallopedand lewand other curlew species at the Brit- wing liningsin all plumagesthis species notchedalong the edges,with the feather ish Museum by Frank Walker and was discounted, and the Eurasian Curlew edgesbright reddishbuff. The coverts reviewedby FredT. H. Smithand Robert waseliminated owing to the absenceof a had a similarpattern. but were whitish- Swindleyof Melbourne,Australia. Paul- white rump, lower back and wing lin- edged and noticeablylighter in colour son noted that "the short bill, unworn ings.Since the bird was largeand had no (•f. Kobayashi1956, Prateret al. 1977). plumageand relatively light stripedven- distincthead stripes, we concludedthat it The bird wasobserved for approximately tral surface,"indicated juvenal plumage was not a Whimbrel (Numeniusphaeo- 15-20 minutes at distances as close as l0 andpresumed the bird to be a maleowing pus), Bristle-thighedCurlew (N. tahi- metersbefore it finally flew off to the to the very shortbill thislate in the sea- tiensis),or any of the othersmaller cur- southeast. son. Smith stated that the bill was the lews, but that it was a Far Eastern Curlew Copiesof the field notesand photo- shortesthe had ever seenon a juvenile (N. rnadagascariensis). graphshave beenplaced on file at the Far EasternCurlew, almostcertainly due 14 AmericanBirds, Spring 1986 to the fact that he had apparentlynever ACKNOWLEDGMENTS KING, B., M. WOODCOCK and E. C. observedone so young. DICKINSON. 1975. A Field Guide to the The Far Eastern Curlew's breeding We would like to thank Dennis Paul- Birds of South-East Asia. Collins, Glas- range,like thatof manySiberian species, son, Frank Walker, Fred T.H. Smith, gow. KIYOSU, Y. 1959. Birds' Life in Japan,Vol. is imperfectlyknown but seemsto en- and Robert Swindley for their time and II. Birds of the Waterside. Hoikusha, l- compasseastern Siberia from the Olju- assistancein reviewingthe photographs ChomeUemcnmachi, Higashiku, Osaka. torski Peninsula west, to include the and written descriptionsof the sighting KOBAYASHI, K. 1956. Birds of Japanin Kamchatka Peninsula and the northern and comments on the identification. Also Natural Colours. Hoikusha, Osaka. shore of the Sea of Okhotsk, north to specialthanks to RichardJ. Canningsand PIZZEY, G. 1980. Field Guide to the Birds of about latitude 63øN, and west to the Ol- WayneC. Weber who revieweda draft of Australia. Princeton University Press, Princeton,New Jersey. jokma River, then south to northern the manuscript. PRATER, A. J., J. H. MARCHANT and J. Mongoliaand southeastto SachalinIs- VUORINEN. 1977. Guide to the Identifi- land and the northern Sea of Japan LITERATURE CITED cation and Ageing of Holarctic Waders. BTO Field Guide 17. British Trust for Or- (AmericanOrnithologists' Union 1983, AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. Dement'evet al. 1959). The speciesis 1983. Checklist of North American Birds. nithology, BeechGrove. ROBERSON, D. 1980. Rare Birds of the notedas a long-distancemigrant to east- 6th Edition. American Ornithologists' West Coast of North America. Woodcock Union, Lawrence, Kansas. ernChina, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Philli- Publications, Pacific Grove, California. pines,Indonesia, Solomon Islands, Aus- CAMPBELL, R. W., M. G. SHEPARD, B. A. MACDONALD and W. C. WEBER. SCOTF, S. L. (Ed.) 1983. Field Guide to the Birds of North America. National Geo- tralia and New Zealand (Pizzey 1980, 1974. Vancouver Birds in 1972. Vancou- Kinget al. 1975). In North AmericaRo- ver NaturalHistory Society, Vancouver. graphicSociety, Washington, DC. SLATER, P. 1970. A Field Guide to Austra- berson(1980) listed eleven Alaskan rec- CRAMP, S., andK. E. L. SIMMONS (Eds.). ordsinvolving fourteen individuals dur- 1983. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. lian Birds. Vol. I. Non-passerines.Rigby Ltd., Sydney. ing spring migration on Adak and Vol. lII. Oxford University Press, Ox- Amchitka (Aleutian Islands), St. Paul ford.. andSt. George(Pribilof Islands)and at DEMENT'EV, G. P. and N. A. GLADKOV (Eds.). 1959. Birds of the Soviet Union. Waleson the mainland,plus a probable Vol lIl. Israel Program for Scientific record for St. Michael, Norton Sound. Translations, Jerusalem.. From 1981 to 1984 there have been an GIBSON, D. D. 1981. The nestingseason: --2695 W. 2nd Ave., Vancouver, additionalsix sightingsduring May to AlaskaRegion. Am. Birds 35:969-970. B.C. V6K IKI (Kragh), 6-1661 E. loth mid-June in the western Aleutian Islands __. 1982. The nestingseason: Alaska Re- Ave., Vancouver, B.C. V5N IX6 gion. Am. Birds 36:1007-1009. (Gibson 1981, 1982, 1983 and 1984). (Kautesk), 103-1545 Trafalgar St., __. 1983.The springmigration: Alaska Re- Our sightingis thereforethe first non- gion. Am. Birds 37:902-903. Vancouver,B.C. V6K 3R4 (Ireland), Alaskan,and apparently first fall record, __. 1984. The springmigration: Alaska Re- 545 Amess St., New Westminster, B.C. for North America. gion. Am. Birds 38:947-948. V3L 4A8 (Sian). Volume 40, Number I 15 .
Recommended publications
  • Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015)
    IUCN Red List version 2015.4: Table 7 Last Updated: 19 November 2015 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2014 (IUCN Red List version 2014.3) and 2015 (IUCN Red List version 2015-4) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered, EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2014) List (2015) change version Category Category MAMMALS Aonyx capensis African Clawless Otter LC NT N 2015-2 Ailurus fulgens Red Panda VU EN N 2015-4
    [Show full text]
  • Nordmann's Greenshank Population Analysis, at Pantai Cemara Jambi
    Final Report Nordmann’s Greenshank Population Analysis, at Pantai Cemara Jambi Cipto Dwi Handono1, Ragil Siti Rihadini1, Iwan Febrianto1 and Ahmad Zulfikar Abdullah1 1Yayasan Ekologi Satwa Alam Liar Indonesia (Yayasan EKSAI/EKSAI Foundation) Surabaya, Indonesia Background Many shorebirds species have declined along East Asian-Australasian Flyway which support the highest diversity of shorebirds in the world, including the globally endangered species, Nordmann’s Greenshank. Nordmann’s Greenshank listed as endangered in the IUCN Red list of Threatened Species because of its small and declining population (BirdLife International, 2016). It’s one of the world’s most threatened shorebirds, is confined to the East Asian–Australasian Flyway (Bamford et al. 2008, BirdLife International 2001, 2012). Its global population is estimated at 500–1,000, with an estimated 100 in Malaysia, 100–200 in Thailand, 100 in Myanmar, plus unknown but low numbers in NE India, Bangladesh and Sumatra (Wetlands International 2006). The population is suspected to be rapidly decreasing due to coastal wetland development throughout Asia for industry, infrastructure and aquaculture, and the degradation of its breeding habitat in Russia by grazing Reindeer Rangifer tarandus (BirdLife International 2012). Mostly Nordmann’s Greenshanks have been recorded in very small numbers throughout Southeast Asia, and there are few places where it has been reported regularly. In Myanmar, for example, it was rediscovered after a gap of almost 129 years. The total count recorded by the Asian Waterbird Census (AWC) in 2006 for Myanmar was 28 birds with 14 being the largest number at a single locality (Naing 2007). In 2011–2012, Nordmann’s Greenshank was found three times in Sumatera Utara province, N Sumatra.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Billed Curlew Distributions in Intertidal Habitats: Scale-Dependent Patterns Ryan L
    LONG-BILLED CURLEW DISTRIBUTIONS IN INTERTIDAL HABITATS: SCALE-DEPENDENT PATTERNS RYAN L. MATHIS, Department of Wildlife, Humboldt State University, Arcata, Cali- fornia 95521 (current address: National Wild Turkey Federation, P. O. Box 1050, Arcata, California 95518) MARK A. ColwELL, Department of Wildlife, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California 95521; [email protected] LINDA W. LEEMAN, Department of Wildlife, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California 95521 (current address: EDAW, Inc., 2022 J. St., Sacramento, California 95814) THOMAS S. LEEMAN, Department of Wildlife, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California 95521 (current address: Environmental Science Associates, 8950 Cal Center Drive, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95826) ABSTRACT. Key ecological insights come from understanding a species’ distribu- tion, especially across several spatial scales. We studied the distribution (uniform, random, or aggregated) at low tide of nonbreeding Long-billed Curlew (Numenius americanus) at three spatial scales: within individual territories (1–8 ha), in the Elk River estuary (~50 ha), and across tidal habitats of Humboldt Bay (62 km2), Cali- fornia. During six baywide surveys, 200–300 Long-billed Curlews were aggregated consistently in certain areas and were absent from others, suggesting that foraging habitats varied in quality. In the Elk River estuary, distributions were often (73%) uniform as curlews foraged at low tide, although patterns tended toward random (27%) when more curlews were present during late summer and autumn. Patterns of predominantly uniform distribution across the estuary were a consequence of ter- ritoriality. Within territories, eight Long-billed Curlews most often (75%) foraged in a manner that produced a uniform distribution; patterns tended toward random (16%) and aggregated (8%) when individuals moved over larger areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Record of Far Eastern Curlew (Numenius Madagascariensis) in British Columbia
    The First Record of Far Eastern Curlew (Numenius madagascariensis) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin and Don Cecile. Submitted: April 15, 2018. Introduction and Distribution The Far Eastern Curlew (Numenius madagascariensis) is the largest migratory shorebird in the world. This species is found only along the East Asian–Australasian Flyway. The Far Eastern Curlew breeds on open mossy or transitional bogs, moss-lichen bogs and wet meadows, and on the swampy shores of small lakes in Siberia and Kamchatka in Russia, as well as in north-eastern Mongolia and China (Hayman et al. 1986, del Hoyo et al. 1996). The Yellow Sea of the Republic of Korea and China is a vitally important stopover site on migration. This species is also a common passage migrant in Japan and Indonesia, and is occasionally recorded moving through Thailand, Brunei, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia and Singapore (O’Brien et al. 2006). During the winter a few birds occur in southern Republic of Korea, Japan, China, and Taiwan (Brazil 2009, EAAFP 2017). About 25% of the population is thought to winter in the Philippines, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea. Most birds, approximately 73% or 28,000 individuals, spend the winter in Australia, where birds are found primarily on the coast of all states, particularly the north, east and south-east regions including Tasmania (Bamford et al. 2008, BirdLife 2016). In the early 2000’s, the global population of the Far Eastern Curlew was estimated at 38,000 individuals (BirdLife 2016). Unfortunately due to the fact that the global population is declining, the true population size is likely to be much smaller, and may not exceed 20,000 individuals (BirdLife 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of the Population Trend of Far Eastern Curlew Numenius Madagascariensis in Banyuasin Peninsula, South Sumatra, Indonesia
    Ecologica Montenegrina 44: 11-18 (2021) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em http://dx.doi.org/10.37828/em.2021.44.2 Is the global decline reflects local declines? A case of the population trend of Far Eastern Curlew Numenius madagascariensis in Banyuasin Peninsula, South Sumatra, Indonesia MUHAMMAD IQBAL1*, CIPTO DWI HANDONO2, DENI MULYANA3, ARUM SETIAWAN4, ZAZILI HANAFIAH4, HENNI MARTINI5, SARNO4, INDRA YUSTIAN4 & HILDA ZULKIFLI4 1Biology Program, Faculty of Science, Sriwijaya University, Jalan Padang Selasa 524, Palembang, South Sumatra 30139, Indonesia. 2Yayasan Ekologi Satwa Liar Indonesia (EKSAI), Jalan Kutisari 1 No. 19, Surabaya, East Java 60291, Indonesia 3Berbak Sembilang National Park, South Sumatra office, Jalan Tanjung Api-api komplek Imadinatuna No. 114, South Sumatra, Indonesia 4Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Sriwijaya University, Jalan Raya Palembang-Prabumulih km 32, Indralaya, South Sumatra, Indonesia. 5Hutan Kita Institute (HAKI), Jalan Yudo No. 9H, Palembang, South Sumatra 30126, Indonesia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received 28 June 2021 │ Accepted by V. Pešić: 13 July 2021 │ Published online 16 July 2021. Abstract Far Eastern Curlew Numenius madagascariensis (Linnaeus, 1766) is Endangered species confined in East Asian Australasian Flyway (EAAF) sites. We compiled and summarized all historical numbers of Far Eastern Curlew in Banyuasin Peninsula, South Sumatra, Indonesia. A total of 30 records were documented from 1984 to 2020. The largest number is 2,620 individuals during the migration period in 1988. Unfortunately, the largest number drop to 1,750 individuals in wintering period in 2008, and then drop to 850 individuals in 2019. The numbers indicate that the population decline by up to 62% in the last 35 years (1984 to 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Population Analysis and Community Workshop for Far Eastern Curlew Conservation Action in Pantai Cemara, Desa Sungai Cemara – Jambi
    POPULATION ANALYSIS AND COMMUNITY WORKSHOP FOR FAR EASTERN CURLEW CONSERVATION ACTION IN PANTAI CEMARA, DESA SUNGAI CEMARA – JAMBI Final Report Small Grant Fund of the EAAFP Far Eastern Curlew Task Force Iwan Febrianto, Cipto Dwi Handono & Ragil S. Rihadini Jambi, Indonesia 2019 The aim of this project are to Identify the condition of Far Eastern Curlew Population and the remaining potential sites for Far Eastern Curlew stopover in Sumatera, Indonesia and protect the remaining stopover sites for Far Eastern Curlew by educating the government, local people and community around the sites as the effort of reducing the threat of habitat degradation, habitat loss and human disturbance at stopover area. INTRODUCTION The Far Eastern Curlew (Numenius madagascariencis) is the largest shorebird in the world and is endemic to East Asian – Australian Flyway. It is one of the Endangered migratory shorebird with estimated global population at 38.000 individual, although a more recent update now estimates the population at 32.000 (Wetland International, 2015 in BirdLife International, 2017). An analysis of monitoring data collected from around Australia and New Zealand (Studds et al. in prep. In BirdLife International, 2017) suggests that the species has declined much more rapidly than was previously thought; with an annual rate of decline of 0.058 equating to a loss of 81.7% over three generations. Habitat loss occuring as a result of development is the most significant threat currently affecting migratory shorebird along the EAAF (Melville et al. 2016 in EAAFP 2017). Loss of habitat at critical stopover sites in the Yellow Sea is suspected to be the key threat to this species and given that it is restricted to East Asian - Australasian Flyway, the declines in the non-breeding are to be representative of the global population.
    [Show full text]
  • Loss of Shorebird Habitat As a Result of Mangrove Incursion Due to Sea-Level Rise and Urbanization
    Extract only - complete publication at www.jncc.gov.uk/worldwaterbirds Waterbirds around the world A global overview of the conservation, management and research of the world's waterbird flyways Edited by G.C. Boere, C.A. Galbraith and D.A. Stroud Assisted by L.K. Bridge, I. Colquhoun, D.A. Scott, D.B.A. Thompson and L.G. Underhill EDINBURGH, UK: THE STATIONERY OFFICE Extract only - complete publication at www.jncc.gov.uk/worldwaterbirds © Scottish Natural Heritage 2006 First published in 2006 by The Stationery Office Limited 71 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH3 9AZ, UK. Applications for reproduction should be made to Scottish Natural Heritage, Great Glen House, Leachkin Road, Inverness IV3 8NW, UK. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0 11 497333 4 Recommended citation: Boere, G.C., Galbraith, C.A. & Stroud, D.A. (eds). 2006. Waterbirds around the world. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, UK. 960 pp. Names used for geographical entities do not imply recognition, by the organisers of the Waterbirds around the world conference or other supporting organisations or governments, of the political status or boundaries of any particular territory. Names of territories used (and any alternatives) are included solely to help users of this publication apply information contained within this volume for waterbird conservation purposes. The views expressed in papers included within this volume do not necessarily represent views of the editors or the organisations and governments that supported the conference and this publication. Cover photography: Whooper Swans Cygnus cygnus arriving at Martin Mere, England.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List
    Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List The target species list (species to be surveyed) should not change over the course of the study, therefore determining the target species list is an important project design task. Because waterbirds, including shorebirds, can occur in very high numbers in a census area, it is often not possible to count all species without compromising the quality of the survey data. For the basic shorebird census program (protocol 1), we recommend counting all shorebirds (sub-Order Charadrii), all raptors (hawks, falcons, owls, etc.), Common Ravens, and American Crows. This list of species is available on our field data forms, which can be downloaded from this site, and as a drop-down list on our online data entry form. If a very rare species occurs on a shorebird area survey, the species will need to be submitted with good documentation as a narrative note with the survey data. Project goals that could preclude counting all species include surveys designed to search for color-marked birds or post- breeding season counts of age-classed bird to obtain age ratios for a species. When conducting a census, you should identify as many of the shorebirds as possible to species; sometimes, however, this is not possible. For example, dowitchers often cannot be separated under censuses conditions, and at a distance or under poor lighting, it may not be possible to distinguish some species such as small Calidris sandpipers. We have provided codes for species combinations that commonly are reported on censuses. Combined codes are still species-specific and you should use the code that provides as much information as possible about the potential species combination you designate.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifting Nonbreeding Distributions of Migratory Fauna in Relation to Climatic Change
    Global Change Biology (2005) 11, 31–38, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00876.x Shifting nonbreeding distributions of migratory fauna in relation to climatic change GRAHAM E. AUSTIN andMARK M. REHFISCH British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK Abstract The distributions of eight out of nine common species of waders (Charadrii) overwintering on UK estuaries have changed in association with recent climate change. These birds represent a high proportion of various populations from breeding grounds as far apart as Greenland to the west to high-arctic Russia to the east. During warmer winters, smaller proportions of seven species wintered in south-west Britain. The distributions of the smaller species show the greatest temperature dependence. The opposite was found for the largest species and no relationship was found for a particularly site-faithful species. In north-west Europe, the winter isotherms have a broadly north to south alignment, with the east being colder than the west. The average minimum winter temperatures across the UK having increased by about 1.5 1C since the mid-1980s, the temperatures on the east coast during recent winters have been similar to those of the west coast during the mid-1980s. On average, estuaries on the east and south coasts of Britain have muddier sediments than those on the west coast and thus support a higher biomass of the invertebrate prey of waders. We suggest that, with global climatic change, the advantage gained by waders wintering in the milder west to avoid cold weather-induced mortality is diminished. Consequently, more choose to winter in the east and thus benefit from better foraging opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Development of Long-Billed Curlew Chicks
    April 1973] General Notes 435 Pitelka and Donald L. Beaver critically read the manuscript. This work was con- ducted under the I.B.P. Analysis of Ecosystems-TundraProgram and supported by a grant to F. A. Pitelka from the National ScienceFoundation.--THo•rAs W. CUSTrR, Department o! Zoology and Museum o! Vertebrate Zoology, University o! California, Berkeley,California 94720. Accepted9 May 72. Growth and development of Long-billed Curlew chicks.--Compared with the altricial nestlings of passerinesand the semiprecocialyoung of gulls, few studies of the growth and developmentof the precocialchicks of the Charadrii have been made (Pettingill, 1970: 378). In Europe, yon Frisch (1958, 1959) describedthe develop- ment of behavior in 14 plovers and sandpipers. Davis (1943) and Nice (1962) have reported on the growth of Killdeer (Charadriusvociferus), Nice (1962) on the Spotted Sandpiper (Actiris macularia), and Webster (1942) on the growth and development of plumages in the Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani). Pettingill (1936) studiedthe atypical AmericanWoodcock (Philohelaminor). Among the curlews, Genus Numenius, only the Eurasian Curlew (N. arquata) has been studied (von Frisch, 1956). Becauseof the scant knowledgeabout the development of the youngin the Charadriiand the scarcityof informationon all aspectsof the breeding biology of the Long-billed Curlew (N. americanus) (Palmer, 1967), I believe that the following data on the growth and development of Long-billed Curlew chicks are relevant. I took four eggs,one being pipped, from a nest 10 miles west of Brigham City, Box Elder County, Utah, on 24 May 1966. One egg was preservedimmediately for additional study, the others I placed in a 4' X 3' X 2' cardboard box with a 60-watt lamp for warmth in a vacant room in my home until they hatched.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Shorebird Profiles
    List of Shorebird Profiles Pacific Central Atlantic Species Page Flyway Flyway Flyway American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) •513 American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana) •••499 Black-bellied Plover (Pluvialis squatarola) •488 Black-necked Stilt (Himantopus mexicanus) •••501 Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani)•490 Buff-breasted Sandpiper (Tryngites subruficollis) •511 Dowitcher (Limnodromus spp.)•••485 Dunlin (Calidris alpina)•••483 Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemestica)••475 Killdeer (Charadrius vociferus)•••492 Long-billed Curlew (Numenius americanus) ••503 Marbled Godwit (Limosa fedoa)••505 Pacific Golden-Plover (Pluvialis fulva) •497 Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa)••473 Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres)•••479 Sanderling (Calidris alba)•••477 Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus)••494 Spotted Sandpiper (Actitis macularia)•••507 Upland Sandpiper (Bartramia longicauda)•509 Western Sandpiper (Calidris mauri) •••481 Wilson’s Phalarope (Phalaropus tricolor) ••515 All illustrations in these profiles are copyrighted © George C. West, and used with permission. To view his work go to http://www.birchwoodstudio.com. S H O R E B I R D S M 472 I Explore the World with Shorebirds! S A T R ER G S RO CHOOLS P Red Knot (Calidris canutus) Description The Red Knot is a chunky, medium sized shorebird that measures about 10 inches from bill to tail. When in its breeding plumage, the edges of its head and the underside of its neck and belly are orangish. The bird’s upper body is streaked a dark brown. It has a brownish gray tail and yellow green legs and feet. In the winter, the Red Knot carries a plain, grayish plumage that has very few distinctive features. Call Its call is a low, two-note whistle that sometimes includes a churring “knot” sound that is what inspired its name.
    [Show full text]
  • Curlew Conservation and New Woodland in Scotland – Essential Steps for Forest Managers
    Curlew conservation and new woodland in Scotland – essential steps for forest managers What you can do to help save the globally-threatened curlew The evocative call of the curlew has echoed across Scotland landscape for generations, but these much-loved birds are at risk of being lost. Since the mid-1990s, their numbers have dropped by 61%. They are disappearing – fast. Scotland’s global importance for curlew Scotland holds an estimated 15% of the global breeding population of Eurasian curlew. Curlew is listed as globally Near-Threatened on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species and is now a Red-listed Bird of Conservation Concern in the UK. The UK is a signatory to the African Eurasian Waterbird Agreement so the Scottish government has an international responsibility to act for curlew. The combination of its global conservation status, the importance of the UK and its rapid decline makes curlew arguably the most urgent bird conservation priority in Scotland. The impact of new woodlands on curlew Curlews are widely dispersed and nest in open ground often dominated by rough damp grass or heath. Their rapid decline is driven by land use change at the landscape scale - primarily: A reduction in habitat extent and quality. This includes conversion to forest plantations and new woodland. Curlews need large extents of open ground with few trees. Predation of nests and chicks by generalist predators including foxes and crows. The failure of breeding birds to produce enough young is the main driver of their decline. These influences work together: Open ground and marginal farmland which offers good quality habitat for curlews is often proposed for new woodland; this, in turn, can provide cover for predators.
    [Show full text]