DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of the Conflict Between Migratory Birds and Electricity Power Grids in the African-Eurasian Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of the Conflict Between Migratory Birds and Electricity Power Grids in the African-Eurasian Region CMS CONVENTION ON Distribution: General MIGRATORY UNEP/CMS/Inf.10.38/ Rev.1 SPECIES 11 November 2011 Original: English TENTH MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES Bergen, 20-25 November 2011 Agenda Item 19 REVIEW OF THE CONFLICT BETWEEN MIGRATORY BIRDS AND ELECTRICITY POWER GRIDS IN THE AFRICAN-EURASIAN REGION (Prepared by Bureau Waardenburg for AEWA and CMS) Pursuant to the recommendation of the 37 th Meeting of the Standing Committee, the AEWA and CMS Secretariats commissioned Bureau Waardenburg to undertake a review of the conflict between migratory birds and electricity power grids in the African-Eurasian region, as well as of available mitigation measures and their effectiveness. Their report is presented in this information document and an executive summary is also provided as document UNEP/CMS/Conf.10.29. A Resolution on power lines and migratory birds is also tabled for COP as UNEP/CMS/Resolution10.11. For reasons of economy, documents are printed in a limited number, and will not be distributed at the meeting. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copy to the meeting and not to request additional copies. The Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds (AEWA) and the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) REVIEW OF THE CONFLICT BETWEEN MIGRATORY BIRDS AND ELECTRICITY POWER GRIDS IN THE AFRICAN-EURASIAN REGION Funded by AEWA’s cooperation-partner, RWE RR NSG, which has developed the method for fitting bird protection markings to overhead lines by helicopter. Produced by Bureau Waardenburg Boere Conservation Consultancy STRIX Ambiente e Inovação Endangered Wildlife Trust – Wildlife & Energy Program Compiled by: Hein Prinsen 1, Gerard Boere 2, Nadine Píres 3 & Jon Smallie 4. 1. Bureau Waardenburg bv, Culemborg, the Netherlands, [email protected] , www.buwa.nl 2. Boere Conservation Consultancy, Gorssel, the Netherlands, [email protected] 3. STRIX Ambiente e Inovação, Porto Salvo, Portugal, [email protected] , www.strix.pt 4. Endangered Wildlife Trust (Wildlife & Energy Program), Modderfontein, South Africa, [email protected] , www.ewt.org.za Milestones in the production of this review Last up-date: September 2011; presented to the CMS Scientific Council through correspondence and to the 10 th meeting of the AEWA Technical Committee, 12-16 September 2011, Naivasha, Kenya. Review of the Conflict between Migratory Birds and the Electricity Power Grids in the African-Eurasian Region 1 Final draft: November 2011, submitted to the 17 th meeting of the CMS Scientific Council on 17-18 November 2011 in Bergen, Norway, the 10 th Conference of the Parties to CMS on 20-25 November 2011 in Bergen, Norway and the 5th Meeting of the Parties to AEWA on 14-18 May 2012 in La Rochelle, France. Contributors: Besides the authors listed above, the following persons contributed to (parts of) this review: Bureau Waardenburg: Jonne Hartman, Abel Gyimesi, Angela van Bergeijk, Mark Collier, and Jan van der Winden; STRIX: Filipe Canario, Ricardo Tomé; EWT-WEP: Megan Diamond. Recommended citation: Prinsen, H.A.M., G.C. Boere, N. Píres & J.J. Smallie (Compilers), 2011. Review of the conflict between migratory birds and electricity power grids in the African-Eurasian region. CMS Technical Series No. XX, AEWA Technical Series No. XX Bonn, Germany. Acknowledgements: Thanks go to the UNEP/AEWA Secretariat and UNEP/CMS Secretariat, Aline Kuehl, Borja Heredia, Sergey Dereliev and Florian Keil for helpful comments on this review. We thank the CMS and AEWA Focal Points of the following countries for the information they provided: Algeria, Benin, Bulgaria, Canada, Denmark, Ethiopia, European Union, Germany, Ghana, Hungary, Israel, Kenya, Liechtenstein, FYR of Macedonia, Monaco, Montenegro, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Portugal, Romania, Republic of Serbia, Slovakia, South Africa, Sudan, Switzerland, Togo, Uganda, and United Kingdom. Furthermore, we like to thank the following persons for providing information or help in compiling the review report and these guidelines: Ivaylo Angelov, Miklós Antal, Sherif Baha El Din, Boris Barov, Julieta Costa, Chang- Yong Choi, Nick Davidson, Damijan Denac, Tasos Dimalexis, Margus Ellermaa, George Eshiamwata, Richard Grimmett, Dieter Haas, Rick Harness, David Horal, Roger Jaensch, Helmut Jaklitsch, Vicky Jones, Frans Koops, Dražen Kotrošan, Aleksi Lehikoinen, João Loureiro, Alexander Matsyna, Guillam McIvor, Taej Mundkur, Markus Nipkow, Derek Pomeroy, Dave Pritchard, Alice Ramsay, Borut Rubini č, Mike & Ann Scott, Ivan Scrase, Svetoslav Spasov, Elchin Sultanov, Lukas Viktora, Roland van der Vliet, Tatyana Yassievich, Leo Zwarts. Picture on the cover: Blue Crane ( Anthropoides paradisea ), collision victim of transmission line in South Africa. © EWT-WEP. Disclaimer The designation employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of AEWA and CMS concerning the legal status of any State, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers and boundaries. Review of the Conflict between Migratory Birds and the Electricity Power Grids in the African-Eurasian Region 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary................................................................................................................................. 4 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Electrocution........................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1. Introduction................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2. Contributing Factors and Causes................................................................................................... 9 2.3. Species Involved and Magnitude ................................................................................................ 11 2.4. Regional Overview of Electrocution Conflict ............................................................................. 12 2.5. Mitigation and Prevention of Electrocution ................................................................................ 24 3. Collisions........................................................................................................................................... 28 3.1. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 28 3.2. Contributing Factors and Causes................................................................................................. 28 3.3. Species Involved and Magnitude of Problem.............................................................................. 34 3.4. Regional Overview of Collision Conflict.................................................................................... 41 3.5. Mitigation and Prevention of Collisions...................................................................................... 51 4. Disturbance and Loss of Habitat........................................................................................................ 55 5. Positive Side Effects of Power Lines for Birds.................................................................................. 56 5.1. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 56 5.2. Storks .......................................................................................................................................... 56 5.3. Raptors........................................................................................................................................ 57 5.4. Other Species .............................................................................................................................. 59 6. Legislation overview.......................................................................................................................... 60 6.1. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 60 6.2. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) ................................................................................ 61 6.3. Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, especially as Waterbird Habitat (Ramsar Convention) ....................................................................................................................................... 62 6.4. Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) ....................... 62 6.5. Agreement on the Conservation of African Eurasian Migratory Waterbird (AEWA) ................ 63 6.6. MoU on the Conservation of Migratory Birds of Prey in Africa and Eurasia ........................... 649 6.7. MoU on the Conservation and Management of the Middle-European Population of the Great Bustard............................................................................................................................................... 65 6.8. Bern Convention ......................................................................................................................... 65 6.9. EU Directives.............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Great Bustard Action Plan
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals Secretariat provided by the United Nations Environment Programme THIRD MEETING OF THE SIGNATORIES OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON THE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE MIDDLE-EUROPEAN POPULATION OF THE GREAT BUSTARD (Otis tarda ) 8-12 April 2013, Szarvas, Hungary CMS/GB/MoS3/Inf.10 Agenda Item 7.2 ACTION PLAN Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation and Management of the Middle-European Population of the Great Bustard (Otis tarda ) ACTION PLAN Part 1 (General) -2- The Signatories should, in terms of legislation and enforcement, undertake all appropriate measures which benefit the Great Bustards, in particular in the field of habitat protection and restoration, prevention of hunting, disturbance and other threats, regulation of possession and trade, recovery measures, cross-border cooperation, monitoring and research, training and awareness raising. This action plan and the Memorandum of Understanding also represent the implementation of objective 1.1.5 of the Species Action Plan for the Great Bustard approved by the Ornis committee and referred to by the recommendation of 26 January 1996 of the Standing Committee of the Convention of the Conservation on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats. Numbers in square brackets - [ ] - refer to the objective numbers of the 1996 Action Plan. 1. Habitat protection It is essential that key habitats of the Great Bustard be maintained and, where appropriate, restored by means of protected areas and/or otherwise. 1.1 Protected areas 1.1.1 Legislative measures The responsible authorities should provide the species with full legal protection throughout its range to ensure that key habitats will be maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of the Population Trend of Far Eastern Curlew Numenius Madagascariensis in Banyuasin Peninsula, South Sumatra, Indonesia
    Ecologica Montenegrina 44: 11-18 (2021) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em http://dx.doi.org/10.37828/em.2021.44.2 Is the global decline reflects local declines? A case of the population trend of Far Eastern Curlew Numenius madagascariensis in Banyuasin Peninsula, South Sumatra, Indonesia MUHAMMAD IQBAL1*, CIPTO DWI HANDONO2, DENI MULYANA3, ARUM SETIAWAN4, ZAZILI HANAFIAH4, HENNI MARTINI5, SARNO4, INDRA YUSTIAN4 & HILDA ZULKIFLI4 1Biology Program, Faculty of Science, Sriwijaya University, Jalan Padang Selasa 524, Palembang, South Sumatra 30139, Indonesia. 2Yayasan Ekologi Satwa Liar Indonesia (EKSAI), Jalan Kutisari 1 No. 19, Surabaya, East Java 60291, Indonesia 3Berbak Sembilang National Park, South Sumatra office, Jalan Tanjung Api-api komplek Imadinatuna No. 114, South Sumatra, Indonesia 4Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Sriwijaya University, Jalan Raya Palembang-Prabumulih km 32, Indralaya, South Sumatra, Indonesia. 5Hutan Kita Institute (HAKI), Jalan Yudo No. 9H, Palembang, South Sumatra 30126, Indonesia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received 28 June 2021 │ Accepted by V. Pešić: 13 July 2021 │ Published online 16 July 2021. Abstract Far Eastern Curlew Numenius madagascariensis (Linnaeus, 1766) is Endangered species confined in East Asian Australasian Flyway (EAAF) sites. We compiled and summarized all historical numbers of Far Eastern Curlew in Banyuasin Peninsula, South Sumatra, Indonesia. A total of 30 records were documented from 1984 to 2020. The largest number is 2,620 individuals during the migration period in 1988. Unfortunately, the largest number drop to 1,750 individuals in wintering period in 2008, and then drop to 850 individuals in 2019. The numbers indicate that the population decline by up to 62% in the last 35 years (1984 to 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • The UK Great Bustard Otis Tarda Reintroduction Trial: a 5-Year Progress Report', Oryx, Vol
    Citation for published version: Burnside, RJ, Carter, I, Dawes, A, Waters, D, Lock, L, Goriup, P & Szekely, T 2012, 'The UK great bustard Otis tarda reintroduction trial: a 5-year progress report', Oryx, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605311000627 DOI: 10.1017/s0030605311000627 Publication date: 2012 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication This is the accepted version of a paper which appeared after editorial input by Cambridge University Press, in Oryx, 46 (1), pp. 112-121 published by Cambridge University Press, © 2012 Cambridge University Press. University of Bath Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 The UK great bustard Otis tarda reintroduction trial Word count: 6,713 1 2 3 3 4 ROBERT J. BURNSIDE , IAN CARTER , ALASDAIR DAWES , DAVID WATERS , LEIGH LOCK , 5 1 PAUL GORIUP AND TAMÁS SZÉKELY 1University of Bath, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, Bath BA2 7AY, UK 2Natural England, Touthill Close, Peterborough, PE1 1XN, UK 3Great Bustard Group, 1 Down Barn Close, Winterbourne Gunner, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP4 6JP, UK 4Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy SG19 2DL, UK 5Fieldfare International Ecological Development, 36 Kingfisher Court, Newbury RG14 5SJ, UK 1 Abstract Great bustards became extinct in the UK during the 19th century due to a combination of factors including hunting, egg collection and changes in agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Strategy and Action Plan for the Great Bustard (Otis Tarda) in Morocco 2016–2025
    Conservation Strategy and Action Plan for the Great Bustard (Otis tarda) in Morocco 2016–2025 IUCN Bustard Specialist Group About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN’s work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and deploying nature- based solutions to global challenges in climate, food and development. IUCN supports scientific research, manages field projects all over the world, and brings governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with more than 1,200 government and NGO Members and almost 11,000 volunteer experts in some 160 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by over 1,000 staff in 45 offices and hundreds of partners in public, NGO and private sectors around the world. www.iucn.org About the IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation The IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation was opened in October 2001 with the core support of the Spanish Ministry of Environment, the regional Government of Junta de Andalucía and the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation and Development (AECID). The mission of IUCN-Med is to influence, encourage and assist Mediterranean societies to conserve and sustainably use natural resources in the region, working with IUCN members and cooperating with all those sharing the same objectives of IUCN. www.iucn.org/mediterranean About the IUCN Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of 9,000 experts.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifting Nonbreeding Distributions of Migratory Fauna in Relation to Climatic Change
    Global Change Biology (2005) 11, 31–38, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00876.x Shifting nonbreeding distributions of migratory fauna in relation to climatic change GRAHAM E. AUSTIN andMARK M. REHFISCH British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK Abstract The distributions of eight out of nine common species of waders (Charadrii) overwintering on UK estuaries have changed in association with recent climate change. These birds represent a high proportion of various populations from breeding grounds as far apart as Greenland to the west to high-arctic Russia to the east. During warmer winters, smaller proportions of seven species wintered in south-west Britain. The distributions of the smaller species show the greatest temperature dependence. The opposite was found for the largest species and no relationship was found for a particularly site-faithful species. In north-west Europe, the winter isotherms have a broadly north to south alignment, with the east being colder than the west. The average minimum winter temperatures across the UK having increased by about 1.5 1C since the mid-1980s, the temperatures on the east coast during recent winters have been similar to those of the west coast during the mid-1980s. On average, estuaries on the east and south coasts of Britain have muddier sediments than those on the west coast and thus support a higher biomass of the invertebrate prey of waders. We suggest that, with global climatic change, the advantage gained by waders wintering in the milder west to avoid cold weather-induced mortality is diminished. Consequently, more choose to winter in the east and thus benefit from better foraging opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Development of Long-Billed Curlew Chicks
    April 1973] General Notes 435 Pitelka and Donald L. Beaver critically read the manuscript. This work was con- ducted under the I.B.P. Analysis of Ecosystems-TundraProgram and supported by a grant to F. A. Pitelka from the National ScienceFoundation.--THo•rAs W. CUSTrR, Department o! Zoology and Museum o! Vertebrate Zoology, University o! California, Berkeley,California 94720. Accepted9 May 72. Growth and development of Long-billed Curlew chicks.--Compared with the altricial nestlings of passerinesand the semiprecocialyoung of gulls, few studies of the growth and developmentof the precocialchicks of the Charadrii have been made (Pettingill, 1970: 378). In Europe, yon Frisch (1958, 1959) describedthe develop- ment of behavior in 14 plovers and sandpipers. Davis (1943) and Nice (1962) have reported on the growth of Killdeer (Charadriusvociferus), Nice (1962) on the Spotted Sandpiper (Actiris macularia), and Webster (1942) on the growth and development of plumages in the Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani). Pettingill (1936) studiedthe atypical AmericanWoodcock (Philohelaminor). Among the curlews, Genus Numenius, only the Eurasian Curlew (N. arquata) has been studied (von Frisch, 1956). Becauseof the scant knowledgeabout the development of the youngin the Charadriiand the scarcityof informationon all aspectsof the breeding biology of the Long-billed Curlew (N. americanus) (Palmer, 1967), I believe that the following data on the growth and development of Long-billed Curlew chicks are relevant. I took four eggs,one being pipped, from a nest 10 miles west of Brigham City, Box Elder County, Utah, on 24 May 1966. One egg was preservedimmediately for additional study, the others I placed in a 4' X 3' X 2' cardboard box with a 60-watt lamp for warmth in a vacant room in my home until they hatched.
    [Show full text]
  • Raab, R. Purpose of the Meeting
    Great Bustard MoU and LIFE Project Meeting Illmitz, Austria, March 9, 2017 Purpose of the meeting in context of the species action plan Rainer RAAB, Jochen STEINDL and Manuel WOJTA Technical Office for Biology (Austria) Photo: F. Kovacs The aim of this talk is to inform about endangering factors and their effect on adult birds and to show them in a context of the species action plan and give an overview of held Memorandum of Understanding Meetings for the conservation of the Great Bustard. International agreements and implemented measures • The Memorandum of Understanding is in agreement under the framework of the Bonn Convention, an international agreement on the protection of migratory species. • The critical conservation status of the Great Bustard in its entire European range prompted the European Union to designate it as a priority species for conservation. • Member states are therefore obliged to introduce comprehensive conservation measures for the lasting preservation of remaining populations. MoU Meetings • 14.-18. September 2004, Illmitz, Austria: Memorandum of Understanding on the Great Bustard – Scientific Symposium and first meeting of signatories • 11.-12. November 2006, Mosonmagyaróvár, Hungary: Great Bustard Memorandum of Understanding – Technical Workshop on Comparative Research • 09.-12. November 2008, Feodosia, Crimea, Ukraine: Second Meeting of the Signatories of the Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation and Management of the Middle-European Population of the Great Bustard MoU Meetings • 08.-12. April 2013, Szarvas, Hungary: Great Bustard Scientific Symposium & Third Meeting of the Signatories (MoS3) of the Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation and Management of the Middle-European Population of the Great Bustard (Otis tarda) • 08.-10.
    [Show full text]
  • Curlew Conservation and New Woodland in Scotland – Essential Steps for Forest Managers
    Curlew conservation and new woodland in Scotland – essential steps for forest managers What you can do to help save the globally-threatened curlew The evocative call of the curlew has echoed across Scotland landscape for generations, but these much-loved birds are at risk of being lost. Since the mid-1990s, their numbers have dropped by 61%. They are disappearing – fast. Scotland’s global importance for curlew Scotland holds an estimated 15% of the global breeding population of Eurasian curlew. Curlew is listed as globally Near-Threatened on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species and is now a Red-listed Bird of Conservation Concern in the UK. The UK is a signatory to the African Eurasian Waterbird Agreement so the Scottish government has an international responsibility to act for curlew. The combination of its global conservation status, the importance of the UK and its rapid decline makes curlew arguably the most urgent bird conservation priority in Scotland. The impact of new woodlands on curlew Curlews are widely dispersed and nest in open ground often dominated by rough damp grass or heath. Their rapid decline is driven by land use change at the landscape scale - primarily: A reduction in habitat extent and quality. This includes conversion to forest plantations and new woodland. Curlews need large extents of open ground with few trees. Predation of nests and chicks by generalist predators including foxes and crows. The failure of breeding birds to produce enough young is the main driver of their decline. These influences work together: Open ground and marginal farmland which offers good quality habitat for curlews is often proposed for new woodland; this, in turn, can provide cover for predators.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Timing, Routes, and Connectivity of Eurasian Woodcock Wintering in Britain and Ireland
    Migration Timing, Routes, and Connectivity of Eurasian Woodcock Wintering in Britain and Ireland ANDREW N. HOODLESS,1 Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Burgate Manor, Fordingbridge, Hampshire SP6 1EF, UK CHRISTOPHER J. HEWARD, Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Burgate Manor, Fordingbridge, Hampshire SP6 1EF, UK ABSTRACT Migration represents a critical time in the annual cycle of Eurasian woodcock (Scolopax rusticola), with poten- tial consequences for individual fitness and survival. In October–December, Eurasian woodcock migrate from breeding grounds in northern Eurasia over thousands of kilometres to western Europe, returning in March–May. The species is widely hunted in Europe, with 2.3–3.5 million individuals shot per year; hence, an understanding of the timing of migra- tion and routes taken is an essential part of developing sustainable flyway management. Our aims were to determine the timing and migration routes of Eurasian woodcock wintering in Britain and Ireland, and to assess the degree of connec- tivity between breeding and wintering sites. We present data from 52 Eurasian woodcock fitted with satellite tags in late winter 2012–2016, which indicate that the timing of spring departure varied annually and was positively correlated with temperature, with a mean departure date of 26 March (± 1.4 days SE). Spring migration distances averaged 2,851 ± 165 km (SE), with individuals typically making 5 stopovers. The majority of our sample of tagged Eurasian woodcock migrated to breeding sites in northwestern Russia (54%), with smaller proportions breeding in Denmark, Scandinavia, and Finland (29%); Poland, Latvia, and Belarus (9.5%); and central Russia (7.5%). The accumulated migration routes of tagged individ- uals suggest a main flyway for Eurasian woodcock wintering in Britain and Ireland through Belgium, the Netherlands, and Germany, and then dividing to pass through the countries immediately north and south of the Baltic Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Long-Billed Curlew Numenius Americanus in Peru and Other Observations of Nearctic Waders at the Virilla Estuary Nathan R
    Cotinga 26 First record of Long-billed Curlew Numenius americanus in Peru and other observations of Nearctic waders at the Virilla estuary Nathan R. Senner Received 6 February 2006; final revision accepted 21 March 2006 Cotinga 26(2006): 39–42 Hay poca información sobre las rutas de migración y el uso de los sitios de la costa peruana por chorlos nearcticos. En el fin de agosto 2004 yo reconocí el estuario de Virilla en el dpto. Piura en el noroeste de Peru para identificar los sitios de descanso para los Limosa haemastica en su ruta de migración al sur y aprender más sobre la migración de chorlos nearcticos en Peru. En Virilla yo observí más de 2.000 individuales de 23 especios de chorlos nearcticos y el primer registro de Numenius americanus de Peru, la concentración más grande de Limosa fedoa en Peru, y una concentración excepcional de Limosa haemastica. La combinación de esas observaciones y los resultados de un estudio anterior en el invierno boreal sugiere la posibilidad que Virilla sea muy importante para chorlos nearcticos en Peru. Las observaciones, también, demuestren la necesidad hacer más estudios en la costa peruana durante el año entero, no solemente durante el punto máximo de la migración de chorlos entre septiembre y noviembre. Shorebirds are poorly known in Peru away from bordered for a few hundred metres by sand and established study sites such as Paracas reserve, gravel before low bluffs rise c.30 m. Very little dpto. Ica, and those close to metropolitan areas vegetation grows here, although cows, goats and frequented by visiting birdwatchers and tour pigs owned by Parachique residents graze the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Tringa Melanoleuca (Greater Yellowlegs)
    Maine 2015 Wildlife Action Plan Revision Report Date: January 13, 2016 Tringa melanoleuca (Greater Yellowlegs) Priority 3 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) Class: Aves (Birds) Order: Charadriiformes (Plovers, Sandpipers, And Allies) Family: Scolopacidae (Curlews, Dowitchers, Godwits, Knots, Phalaropes, Sandpipers, Snipe, Yellowlegs, And Woodcock) General comments: Considered stable range wide, considered species of low or moderate concern by US Shorebird Conservation Plan however due to vulnerability to climate change considered priority 3. Listed as "Species of Least Concern" by U. S. Shorebird Conservation Plan Partnership - 2015. Species Conservation Range Maps for Greater Yellowlegs: Town Map: Tringa melanoleuca_Towns.pdf Subwatershed Map: Tringa melanoleuca_HUC12.pdf SGCN Priority Ranking - Designation Criteria: Risk of Extirpation: NA State Special Concern or NMFS Species of Concern: NA Recent Significant Declines: NA Regional Endemic: NA High Regional Conservation Priority: NA High Climate Change Vulnerability: Vulnerability: 3, Confidence: Medium, Reviewers: Decided in Workshop (W) Understudied rare taxa: NA Historical: NA Culturally Significant: NA Habitats Assigned to Greater Yellowlegs: Formation Name Cliff & Rock Macrogroup Name Rocky Coast Formation Name Freshwater Marsh Macrogroup Name Emergent Marsh Macrogroup Name Modified-Managed Marsh Formation Name Intertidal Macrogroup Name Intertidal Gravel Shore Macrogroup Name Intertidal Mudflat Macrogroup Name Intertidal Sandy Shore Stressors Assigned to Greater Yellowlegs:
    [Show full text]
  • An Update of Wallacels Zoogeographic Regions of the World
    REPORTS To examine the temporal profile of ChC produc- specification of a distinct, and probably the last, 3. G. A. Ascoli et al., Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 557 (2008). tion and their correlation to laminar deployment, cohort in this lineage—the ChCs. 4. J. Szentágothai, M. A. Arbib, Neurosci. Res. Program Bull. 12, 305 (1974). we injected a single pulse of BrdU into pregnant A recent study demonstrated that progeni- CreER 5. P. Somogyi, Brain Res. 136, 345 (1977). Nkx2.1 ;Ai9 females at successive days be- tors below the ventral wall of the lateral ventricle 6. L. Sussel, O. Marin, S. Kimura, J. L. Rubenstein, tween E15 and P1 to label mitotic progenitors, (i.e., VGZ) of human infants give rise to a medial Development 126, 3359 (1999). each paired with a pulse of tamoxifen at E17 to migratory stream destined to the ventral mPFC 7. S. J. Butt et al., Neuron 59, 722 (2008). + 18 8. H. Taniguchi et al., Neuron 71, 995 (2011). label NKX2.1 cells (Fig. 3A). We first quanti- ( ). Despite species differences in the develop- 9. L. Madisen et al., Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133 (2010). fied the fraction of L2 ChCs (identified by mor- mental timing of corticogenesis, this study and 10. J. Szabadics et al., Science 311, 233 (2006). + phology) in mPFC that were also BrdU+. Although our findings raise the possibility that the NKX2.1 11. A. Woodruff, Q. Xu, S. A. Anderson, R. Yuste, Front. there was ChC production by E15, consistent progenitors in VGZ and their extended neurogenesis Neural Circuits 3, 15 (2009).
    [Show full text]