DOCSLIB.ORG

Alaska Shorebird Conservation Plan, Version

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alaska Shorebird Conservation Plan, Version Alaska Shorebird Conservation Plan Version III April 2019 Alaska Shorebird Conservation Plan Alaska Shorebird Conservation Plan Version III Suggested Citation: Alaska Shorebird Group. 2019. Alaska Shorebird Conservation Plan. Version III. Alaska Shorebird Group, Anchorage, AK. The Alaska Shorebird Conservation Plan and updates can be viewed and downloaded at: https://www.fws.gov/alaska/pages/migratory-birds/shorebirds Cover: Male Red Knot on breeding territory, Seward Peninsula, Alaska. Photo by Lucas DeCicco. i Alaska Shorebird Conservation Plan Contents DEDICATION v BCR 1: Aleutian/Bering Sea Islands 35 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vi Priority Species 36 Important Shorebird Areas 37 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Primary Conservation Objectives 37 PART I: ALASKA SHOREBIRD 6 Priority Conservation Issues and Actions 38 CONSERVATION PLAN Emerging Conservation Issues 39 Introduction 6 Evaluation of Conservation Progress 40 Vision of the Alaska Shorebird Group 7 BCR 2: Western Alaska 41 Shorebirds in Alaska 7 Priority Species 42 Conservation Issues Facing Shorebirds 14 Important Shorebird Areas 43 Climate Change 14 Primary Conservation Objectives 44 Energy Production and Mining 16 Priority Conservation Issues and Actions 45 Pollution 16 Emerging Conservation Issues 48 Residential and Commercial Development 17 Evaluation of Conservation Progress 48 Agriculture and Aquaculture 17 BCR 3: Arctic Plains and Mountains 50 Transportation and Service Corridors 17 Priority Species 51 Biological Resource Use 18 Important Shorebird Areas 52 Human Intrusions and Disturbance 18 Primary Conservation Objectives 54 Invasive and Problematic Species, Pathogens, 18 and Genes Priority Conservation Issues and Actions 54 Summary of Conservation Threats Across 19 Emerging Conservation Issues 59 Alaska Evaluation of Conservation Progress 60 Conservation Strategy for Alaska 21 BCR 4: Northwestern Interior Forest 62 Research 21 Priority Species 63 Population Inventory and Monitoring 24 Important Shorebird Areas 63 Habitat Management and Protection 26 Primary Conservation Objectives 64 Environmental Education and Public Outreach 26 Priority Conservation Issues and Actions 65 International Collaborations 27 Emerging Conservation Issues 68 Implementation, Coordination, and Evaluation 27 Evaluation of Conservation Progress 68 of the Plan BCR 5: North Pacific Rainforest 70 Shorebird Species Conservation Priorities in 28 Alaska Priority Species 71 Prioritization Process 28 Important Shorebird Areas 72 PART II: ALASKA’S BIRD CONSERVATION 31 Primary Conservation Objectives 72 REGIONS Priority Conservation Issues and Actions 73 The Alaska Environment 31 Emerging Conservation Issues 75 Alaska’s Bird Conservation Regions 34 Evaluation of Conservation Progress 77 LITERATURE CITED 78 ii Alaska Shorebird Conservation Plan APPENDICES Alaska Stewardship Species 134 Appendix 1. Common name, scientific name, 103 Black-bellied Plover 134 and status of shorebirds in Alaska Ruddy Turnstone 134 Appendix 2. Primary wintering areas and 105 Surfbird 135 primary migratory flyways of shorebird species commonly occurring in Alaska Sharp-tailed Sandpiper 136 Appendix 3. Important shorebird migration 108 Western Sandpiper 136 and nonbreeding sites within each Bird Long-billed Dowitcher 137 Conservation Region of Alaska Solitary Sandpiper 137 Appendix 4. Key groups or initiatives 113 Wandering Tattler concerned with shorebird research, 138 monitoring, and conservation efforts that Red-necked Phalarope 138 include populations of shorebirds in Alaska FIGURES Appendix 5. Breeding shorebird surveys within 115 each Bird Conservation Region of Alaska Figure 1. Overview of Alaska, detailing some of 9 the state’s important shorebird sites Appendix 6. Ecoregions of Alaska relative to 122 boundaries of Bird Conservation Regions Figure 2. Distribution of land governed by 32 the major state, federal, and Alaska Native Appendix 7. Habitat preferences of shorebirds 123 organizations within Bird Conservation Regions in Alaska during breeding, migration, and of Alaska winter seasons Figure 3. Bird Conservation Regions in Alaska 33 Appendix 8. Species accounts for priority 125 species in Alaska Figure 4. Aleutian/Bering Sea Islands Bird 35 Greatest Conservation Concern 125 Conservation Region 1 Figure 5. Western Alaska Bird Conservation Bristle-thighed Curlew 125 41 Region 2 Bar-tailed Godwit 125 Figure 6. Arctic Plains and Mountains Bird 50 Red Knot 126 Conservation Region 3 High Conservation Concern 126 Figure 7. Northwestern Interior Forest Bird 61 Black Oystercatcher 126 Conservation Region 4 Figure 8. Northern Pacific Rainforest Bird American Golden-Plover 127 69 Conservation Region 5 Pacific Golden-Plover 127 TABLES Whimbrel 128 Table 1. Estimated population size, population 10 Hudsonian Godwit 128 trend, conservation status, and percent Marbled Godwit 129 occurrence of shorebirds that regularly occur Black Turnstone 129 in Alaska Table 2. Seasonal importance of Bird 12 Dunlin 130 Conservation Regions to Alaska’s regularly Rock Sandpiper 131 occurring shorebird species Buff-breasted Sandpiper 131 Table 3. Identification and characterization 20 Pectoral Sandpiper 132 of primary, secondary, and emerging conservation issues affecting shorebirds Semipalmated Sandpiper 132 among Alaska BCRs Short-billed Dowitcher 133 Table 4. Conservation status of shorebird 30 Lesser Yellowlegs 133 species of conservation concern that regularly occur in Alaska iii Alaska Shorebird Conservation Plan TABLES (continued) Table 5. Area of land managed within each 32 Bird Conservation Region by seven primary groups or agencies Table 6. Priority shorebird species that 36 commonly breed, stage during migration, or winter in the Aleutian/Bering Sea Islands Bird Conservation Region 1 Table 7. Priority shorebird species that 42 commonly breed, stage during migration, or winter in Western Alaska Bird Conservation Region 2 Table 8. Priority shorebird species that 51 commonly breed or stage during migration in Arctic Plains and Mountains Bird Conservation Region 3 Table 9. Priority shorebird species that 63 commonly breed, stage during migration, or winter in Northwestern Interior Forest Bird Conservation Region 4 Table 10. Priority shorebird species that 70 commonly breed, stage during migration, or winter in Northern Pacific Rainforest Bird Conservation Region 5 Red Knots Lucas DeCicco Semipalmated Sandpiper Lucas DeCicco iv Alaska Shorebird Conservation Plan Dedication Photo credit: Alaska Department of Fish and Game. students’ work on the ecology of Black Oystercatch- ers. He published two key reports, “Black Oyster- catcher Conservation Action Plan” for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and “A Global Assessment of the Conservation Status of the Black Oystercatcher Haematopus bachmani” for the International Wader Study Group. He also co-authored several peer-re- viewed journal articles, presented his findings at professional conferences, and wrote many agency Photo credit: Marian Snively reports on his oystercatcher work. David would often This third version of the Alaska Shorebird Conser- say, “My knowledge is a mile wide and an inch deep,” vation Plan is dedicated to the memory of David but this modesty belied the tremendous scope and Fair Tessler in appreciation for his contributions depth of Dave’s interests, especially those related to shorebird science and conservation in Alaska. to biology or ecology. He was easy to talk to, cu- David approached his shorebird research like he rious about people and what they had to say, and did everything else in life—with deep passion, com- was a good listener, traits that earned David many mitment, and an undeniable joy. He embraced his friends. David was a mentor to many and shared oystercatcher research with fearless enthusiasm, his knowledge and insight with easy enthusiasm. careful design, and his uncanny ability to have fun, no Dave lived large, loved to travel, and was an outdoor matter the weather or work conditions. His positive, enthusiast. He was an accomplished skier, climber, can-do, and upbeat personality, as well as his quick and avid surfer. He was a devoted father and hus- wit and sense of humor are legendary. David often band, and was especially fond of camping in Prince reduced people to tears of laughter with his antics; William Sound with his wife, Tracey, and their two people loved to work and be around him. He was children, River and Sierra. David loved his family also highly intelligent and hardworking, as demon- dearly, and was most happy when sharing the natu- strated by his many professional accomplishments. ral world together. In 2015, Dave and his family left As non-game Wildlife Biologist and Coordinator of Alaska to pursue new adventures in Hawaii, where the Wildlife Diversity Program at Alaska Department he took a position with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife of Fish and Game, David’s contributions advanced Service as the Deputy Field Supervisor for Geo- Black Oystercatcher research and conservation in graphic Operations. He and his family loved their Alaska. For example, David was instrumental in the new island life and spent time camping and island formation of the Black Oystercatcher Working Group. hopping. However, he remarked that part of his heart He also mentored and supported several graduate always remained in Alaska. Dave’s humor, charm, enthusiasm, and love of life are greatly missed. v Alaska Shorebird Conservation Plan Tom Rothe, Pacific Birds Habitat Joint Venture Acknowledgments Sarah T. Saalfeld, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service SPECIES ACCOUNT AUTHORS EDITORS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015)
    IUCN Red List version 2015.4: Table 7 Last Updated: 19 November 2015 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2014 (IUCN Red List version 2014.3) and 2015 (IUCN Red List version 2015-4) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered, EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2014) List (2015) change version Category Category MAMMALS Aonyx capensis African Clawless Otter LC NT N 2015-2 Ailurus fulgens Red Panda VU EN N 2015-4
    [Show full text]
  • The Promiseuous Pectoral Sandpiper
    BEHAVIOR The promiscuous Pectoral Sandpiper "nothing evolvesNorth Slope tundra more certainly than a male Pectoral Sandpiper, hooting through chilled Alaskan mist" J.P. Myers [sBARROW,ALASKA, the Pectoral a pendulous, fat-filled organ hanging deep o6-ah, o6-ah, o6-ah each syllable andpiper seasonbegins with a few prominently even while the male stands separated by a moment's silence and distant hoots sometime between the 5th immobile (Fig. 1). Its outline is en- repeatedtwo or three timesper second and 10thof June. At first hearing one has hanced by sharp contrast with the white for l0 to 15 seconds½Fig. 3 and record). difficulty accepting its source as arian. vent, and more still by the way the male Viewing this display in profile is star- The hoot is a fog horn, a sonar beam, an erects his feathers to expose their tling, but imagine what a female Pec- electronic oscillator bearing no relation darker base. toral sees. More often than not she to the sounds about it. Even after bird But the sac comes into its own when serves as the focus of his flight: the and call are linked it seems preposter- the male takes flight to hoot (Fig. 2). He male's path takes him directly over her ous. The way the call is made, the bodily flies low over the tundra, often within a in mid-hoot, perhaps only 5 cm from her distortions that male goes through to few centimeters of the upper blades of head as she feeds in the grass. He make its hoot, are visually just as odd as grass and sedge.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Account
    SPOTTED SANDPIPER Actitis macularius non-breeding visitor, vagrant monotypic Spotted Sandpipers breed across n. N America and winter as far south as c. S America (AOU 1998). The status of this species in the Pacific and the Hawaiian Islands is confused by its similarity to Common Sandpiper, a Eurasian counterpart (Dement'ev and Gladkov 1951c, Cramp and Simmons 1983), that has reached the Hawaiian Islands on at least two occasion and possibly others (David 1991). Records of this pair, unidentified to species, have been reported throughout the Pacific (E 41:115, Clapp 1968a, Pyle and Engbring 1985, Pratt et al. 1987) while confirmed Spotted Sandpipers have been recorded from Clipperton, the Marshall, Johnston, and the Hawaiian Is (Amerson and Shelton 1976, Howell et al. 1993, AOU 1998). David (1991) analyzed records of the two species of Actitis sandpipers in the Southeastern Hawaiian Islands and concluded that, between 1975 and 1989, 6 of 12 birds (1983-1989) could be confirmed as Spotted Sandpipers based on descriptions and photographs while the remaining six (1975-1983) could not be identified. Prior to this, Pyle (1977) listed only the species pair (Spotted/Common Sandpiper) for the Hawaiian Islands. Since this analysis and through the 2000s there have been 25 additional records of Actitis, 18 of which we consider confirmed Spotted Sandpipers while 7 did not include enough descriptive notes to separate them from Common Sandpiper. Because 24 of 37 records in the Southeastern Islands have been confirmed as Spotted Sandpipers and only one has been confirmed as a Common Sandpiper, we assume that the following summary of Actitis sandpipers reflects the status of Spotted Sandpiper, the more expected species in the Southeastern Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Analysis and Community Workshop for Far Eastern Curlew Conservation Action in Pantai Cemara, Desa Sungai Cemara – Jambi
    POPULATION ANALYSIS AND COMMUNITY WORKSHOP FOR FAR EASTERN CURLEW CONSERVATION ACTION IN PANTAI CEMARA, DESA SUNGAI CEMARA – JAMBI Final Report Small Grant Fund of the EAAFP Far Eastern Curlew Task Force Iwan Febrianto, Cipto Dwi Handono & Ragil S. Rihadini Jambi, Indonesia 2019 The aim of this project are to Identify the condition of Far Eastern Curlew Population and the remaining potential sites for Far Eastern Curlew stopover in Sumatera, Indonesia and protect the remaining stopover sites for Far Eastern Curlew by educating the government, local people and community around the sites as the effort of reducing the threat of habitat degradation, habitat loss and human disturbance at stopover area. INTRODUCTION The Far Eastern Curlew (Numenius madagascariencis) is the largest shorebird in the world and is endemic to East Asian – Australian Flyway. It is one of the Endangered migratory shorebird with estimated global population at 38.000 individual, although a more recent update now estimates the population at 32.000 (Wetland International, 2015 in BirdLife International, 2017). An analysis of monitoring data collected from around Australia and New Zealand (Studds et al. in prep. In BirdLife International, 2017) suggests that the species has declined much more rapidly than was previously thought; with an annual rate of decline of 0.058 equating to a loss of 81.7% over three generations. Habitat loss occuring as a result of development is the most significant threat currently affecting migratory shorebird along the EAAF (Melville et al. 2016 in EAAFP 2017). Loss of habitat at critical stopover sites in the Yellow Sea is suspected to be the key threat to this species and given that it is restricted to East Asian - Australasian Flyway, the declines in the non-breeding are to be representative of the global population.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 201026 BOEM Oil Spill Occurrence North Slope Draftforfinal
    OCS Study BOEM 2020-050 Oil Spill Occurrence Rates from Alaska North Slope Oil and Gas Exploration, Development, and Production US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska Region OCS Study BOEM 2020-050 Oil Spill Occurrence Rates from Alaska North Slope Oil and Gas Exploration, Development, and Production October / 2020 Authors: Tim Robertson, Nuka Research and Planning Group, Lead Author Lynetta K. Campbell, Statistical Consulting Services, Lead Analyst Sierra Fletcher, Nuka Research and Planning Group, Editor Prepared under contract #140M0119F0003 by Nuka Research and Planning Group, LLC P.O. Box 175 Seldovia, AK 99663 10 Samoset Street Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska Region DISCLAIMER Study concept, oversight, and funding were provided by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Environmental Studies Program, Washington, DC, under Contract Number 140M0119F0003. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the US Government, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Data and Information Systems webpage (http://www.boem.gov/Environmental-Studies- EnvData/), click on the link for the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS), and search on 2020-050. The report is also available at the National Technical Reports Library at https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Actitis Hypoleucos</I>
    Partial primary moult in first-spring/summer Common Sandpipers Actitis hypoleucos M. NICOLL 1 & P. KEMP 2 •c/o DundeeMuseum, Dundee, Tayside, UK 243 LochinverCrescent, Dundee, Tayside, UK Citation: Nicoll, M. & Kemp, P. 1983. Partial primary moult in first-spring/summer Common Sandpipers Actitis hypoleucos. Wader Study Group Bull. 37: 37-38. This note is intended to draw the attention of wader catch- and the old inner feathersare often retained (Pearson 1974). ers to the needfor carefulexamination of the primariesof Similarly, in Zimbabwe, first-year Common Sandpipers CommonSandpipers Actiris hypoleucos,and other waders, replacethe outerfive to sevenprimaries between December for partial primarywing moult. This is thoughtto be a diag- andApril (Tree 1974). It thusseems normal for first-spring/ nosticfeature of wadersin their first spring and summer summerCommon Sandpipers wintering in eastand southern (Tree 1974). Africa to show a contrast between new outer and old inner While membersof the Tay Ringing Group were mist- primaries.There is no informationfor birdswintering further nettingin Angus,Scotland, during early May 1980,a Com- north.However, there may be differencesin moult strategy mon Sandpiperdied accidentally.This bird was examined betweenwintering areas,since 3 of 23 juvenile Common and measured, noted as an adult, and then stored frozen un- Sandpiperscaught during autumn in Morocco had well- til it was skinned,'sexed', andthe gut contentsremoved for advancedprimary moult (Pienkowski et al. 1976). These analysis.Only duringskinning did we noticethat the outer birdswere moultingnormally, and so may have completed primarieswere fresh and unworn in comparisonto the faded a full primary moult during their first winter (M.W. Pien- and abradedinner primaries.The moult on both wingswas kowski, pers.comm.).
    [Show full text]
  • Common Caribbean Shorebirds: ID Guide
    Common Caribbean Shorebirds: ID Guide Large Medium Small 14”-18” 35 - 46 cm 8.5”-12” 22 - 31 cm 6”- 8” 15 - 20 cm Large Shorebirds Medium Shorebirds Small Shorebirds Whimbrel 17.5” 44.5 cm Lesser Yellowlegs 9.5” 24 cm Wilson’s Plover 7.75” 19.5 cm Spotted Sandpiper 7.5” 19 cm American Oystercatcher 17.5” 44.5 cm Black-bellied Plover 11.5” 29 cm Sanderling 7.75” 19.5 cm Western Sandpiper 6.5” 16.5 cm Willet 15” 38 cm Short-billed Dowitcher 11” 28 cm White-rumped Sandpiper 6” 15 cm Greater Yellowlegs 14” 35.5 cm Ruddy Turnstone 9.5” 24 cm Semipalmated Sandpiper 6.25” 16 cm 6.25” 16 cm American Avocet* 18” 46 cm Red Knot 10.5” 26.5 cm Snowy Plover Least Sandpiper 6” 15 cm 14” 35.5 cm 8.5” 21.5 cm Semipalmated Plover Black-necked Stilt* Pectoral Sandpiper 7.25” 18.5 cm Killdeer* 10.5” 26.5 cm Piping Plover 7.25” 18.5 cm Stilt Sandpiper* 8.5” 21.5 cm Lesser Yellowlegs & Ruddy Turnstone: Brad Winn; Red Knot: Anthony Levesque; Pectoral Sandpiper & *not pictured Solitary Sandpiper* 8.5” 21.5 cm White-rumped Sandpiper: Nick Dorian; All other photos: Walker Golder Clues to help identify shorebirds Size & Shape Bill Length & Shape Foraging Behavior Size Length Sandpipers How big is it compared to other birds? Peeps (Semipalmated, Western, Least) Walk or run with the head down, picking and probing Spotted Sandpiper Short Medium As long Longer as head than head Bobs tail up and down when walking Plovers, Turnstone or standing Small Medium Large Sandpipers White-rumped Sandpiper Tail tips up while probing Yellowlegs Overall Body Shape Stilt Sandpiper Whimbrel, Oystercatcher, Probes mud like “oil derrick,” Willet, rear end tips up Dowitcher, Curvature Plovers Stilt, Avocet Run & stop, pick, hiccup, run & stop Elongate Compact Yellowlegs Specific Body Parts Stroll and pick Bill & leg color Straight Upturned Dowitchers Eye size Plovers = larger, sandpipers = smaller Tip slightly Probe mud with “sewing machine” Leg & neck length downcurved Downcurved bill, body stays horizontal .
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List
    Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List The target species list (species to be surveyed) should not change over the course of the study, therefore determining the target species list is an important project design task. Because waterbirds, including shorebirds, can occur in very high numbers in a census area, it is often not possible to count all species without compromising the quality of the survey data. For the basic shorebird census program (protocol 1), we recommend counting all shorebirds (sub-Order Charadrii), all raptors (hawks, falcons, owls, etc.), Common Ravens, and American Crows. This list of species is available on our field data forms, which can be downloaded from this site, and as a drop-down list on our online data entry form. If a very rare species occurs on a shorebird area survey, the species will need to be submitted with good documentation as a narrative note with the survey data. Project goals that could preclude counting all species include surveys designed to search for color-marked birds or post- breeding season counts of age-classed bird to obtain age ratios for a species. When conducting a census, you should identify as many of the shorebirds as possible to species; sometimes, however, this is not possible. For example, dowitchers often cannot be separated under censuses conditions, and at a distance or under poor lighting, it may not be possible to distinguish some species such as small Calidris sandpipers. We have provided codes for species combinations that commonly are reported on censuses. Combined codes are still species-specific and you should use the code that provides as much information as possible about the potential species combination you designate.
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Sandpiper
    Maine 2015 Wildlife Action Plan Revision Report Date: January 13, 2016 Calidris maritima (Purple Sandpiper) Priority 1 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) Class: Aves (Birds) Order: Charadriiformes (Plovers, Sandpipers, And Allies) Family: Scolopacidae (Curlews, Dowitchers, Godwits, Knots, Phalaropes, Sandpipers, Snipe, Yellowlegs, And Woodcock) General comments: Recent surveys suggest population undergoing steep population decline within 10 years. IFW surveys conducted in 2014 suggest population declined by 49% since 2004 (IFW unpublished data). Maine has high responsibility for wintering population, regional surveys suggest Maine may support over 1/3 of the Western Atlantic wintering population. USFWS Region 5 and Canadian Maritimes winter at least 90% of the Western Atlantic population. Species Conservation Range Maps for Purple Sandpiper: Town Map: Calidris maritima_Towns.pdf Subwatershed Map: Calidris maritima_HUC12.pdf SGCN Priority Ranking - Designation Criteria: Risk of Extirpation: NA State Special Concern or NMFS Species of Concern: NA Recent Significant Declines: Purple Sandpiper is currently undergoing steep population declines, which has already led to, or if unchecked is likely to lead to, local extinction and/or range contraction. Notes: Recent surveys suggest population undergoing steep population decline within 10 years. IFW surveys conducted in 2014 suggest population declined by 49% since 2004 (IFW unpublished data). Maine has high responsibility for wintering populat Regional Endemic: Calidris maritima's global geographic range is at least 90% contained within the area defined by USFWS Region 5, the Canadian Maritime Provinces, and southeastern Quebec (south of the St. Lawrence River). Notes: Recent surveys suggest population undergoing steep population decline within 10 years. IFW surveys conducted in 2014 suggest population declined by 49% since 2004 (IFW unpublished data).
    [Show full text]
  • Actitis Hypoleucos
    Actitis hypoleucos -- Linnaeus, 1758 ANIMALIA -- CHORDATA -- AVES -- CHARADRIIFORMES -- SCOLOPACIDAE Common names: Common Sandpiper; Chevalier guignette European Red List Assessment European Red List Status LC -- Least Concern, (IUCN version 3.1) Assessment Information Year published: 2015 Date assessed: 2015-03-31 Assessor(s): BirdLife International Reviewer(s): Symes, A. Compiler(s): Ashpole, J., Burfield, I., Ieronymidou, C., Pople, R., Van den Bossche, W., Wheatley, H. & Wright, L. Assessment Rationale European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT) In Europe this species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or fluctuating range size, habitat extent/quality, or population size and a small number of locations or severe fragmentation). The population size is extremely large, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature individuals with a continuing decline estimated to be >10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). Despite the fact that the population trend appears to be decreasing, the decline is not believed to be sufficiently rapid to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (>30% decline over ten years or three generations). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern in Europe. In the EU27 the species has undergone moderately rapid declines and is therefore classified as Near Threatened under Criterion A (A2abc+3bc+4abc). Occurrence Countries/Territories of Occurrence Native: Albania; Andorra; Armenia; Austria; Azerbaijan; Belarus; Belgium; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Bulgaria; Croatia; Cyprus; Czech Republic; Denmark; Estonia; Finland; France; Georgia; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Ireland, Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Sandpiper Uttering Call of Wood Sandpiper.—With Reference to J
    NOTES Gannets robbing gulls.—On 5th August 1957, I spent the day at sea in Dingle Bay, Co. Kerry, in the trawler "Ros Brin". As soon as trawling operations began, we were accompanied by a few Storm Petrels (Hydrobates pelagicus), Fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis), Great Black-backed Gulls (Larus marinus), Lesser Black-backed Gulls (L. fuscus), and large numbers of Herring Gulls (L. argentatus). During the gutting periods, and especially when any small waste fish were thrown over-board, six to eight Gannets (Sula bassana), would join in the feast. Any fish that sank too deep for the gulls were immediately taken by the Gannets by the normal manner of diving, but on numerous occasions when a gull sitting on the surface had a fish it could not swallow quickly—i.e. small plaice, dabs and other flat fish—one or other of the Gannets would plunge in a shallow-angled frontal dive at the gull, entering the water about two yards away and snatching the fish from the gull's bill on breaking the surface. The fish was swallowed on the surface. This was repeated many times, and the Gannets also frequently fluttered along the water and snatched fish from the bills of other gulls which they passed. On several occasions, too, a Gannet was seen to lunge into the air after a retreating gull that was attempting to rise from the water with a fish; the Gannet "treading water" with wings half-open and neck fully extended upwards in its endeavour to snap the fish from the slowly rising and heavily gorged' gull.
    [Show full text]