DOCSLIB.ORG

Vaspuez Appendix

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vaspuez Appendix Org. Divers. Evol. 3, Electr. Suppl. 4: 1–14 (2003) © Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik http://senckenberg.de/odes/03-04.htm Preliminary list of Bolivian Orchid species Electr. Suppl. 4. – to: Vásquez, R., Ibisch, P.L. & Gerkmann, B. (2003): Diversity of Bolivian Orchidaceae – a challenge for taxonomic, floristic and conservation research. Org. Divers. Evol. 3(2): 93–102. E = endemic to Bolivia Lit = records based on literature RV... = records based on herbarium vouchers in Herbarium Vasquezianum, Santa Cruz, Bolivia (made by Roberto Vásquez) T = terrestrial (species without T are considered to be predominantly epiphytic) Ecoregions: (1 = Southwest Amazon:) 1.1 = Subandean Amazon Humid Forests, 1.2 = Preandean Amazon Humid Forests, 1.3 = Northern Amazon Humid Forests, 1.4 = Southern Amazon Humid Forests; 2 = Varzea and Igapo; (3 = Amazon Campos:) 3.1 = La Paz Amazon Campos, 3.2 = Beni Amazon Campos; (4 = Flooded Savannas:) 4.1= Moxos Plain Flooded Savannas, 4.2= Pantanal Flooded Savannas; 5 = Dry Chiquitano Forest; 6 = Cerrado; 7 = Gran Chaco Dry Forest; 8 = Yungas; 9 = Tucuman-Bolivian For- est; 10 = Montane Chaco; 11 = Dry Interandean Forests; 12 = Prepuna; 13 = Yungas Paramo; 14 = High-Andean Vegetation; (15 = Puna:) 15.1 = Humid Puna, 15.2 = Semihumid Puna, 15.3 = Dry Puna, 15.4 = Desert Puna. If no ecoregion number is given, the collection locality cannot be assigned to any ecoregion or is completely unknown. Unidentified specimens are included when it is highly probable that they will turn out to represent new species or new records for Bolivia. In some cases, however, species could later be assigned to recorded but hardly known taxa (especially Notylia, Oncidium). Unidentified species of Stelis are not included as they have been studied only insufficiently. 1. Aa calceata (Rchb. f.) Schltr. (Lit) T 15.1/ 15.2 23. Aspasia variegata Lindl. (Lit) 1.4 2. Aa fiebrigii (Schltr.) Schltr. (Lit) T E 11 24. Barbosella cucullata (Lindl.) Schltr. (Lit) 8 3. Aa gymandra (Rchb. f.) Schltr. (Lit) T 15.1/ 15.2 25. Barbosella prorepens (Rchb. f.) Schltr. (Lit) 8 4. Aa inaequalis (Rchb. f.) Schltr. (Lit) T 15.1/ 15.2 26. Barbosella ricii Luer & R.Vásquez (Lit) E 1.1/ 1.2 5. Aa mandonii (Rchb. f.) Schltr. (Lit) T E 13 27. Barbosella vasquezii Luer (Lit) E 8 6. Aa microtidis Schltr. (Lit) T 15.1/ 15.2 28. Baskervilla paranaensis (Kraenzl.) Schltr. (Lit) T 4.2 7. Aa paleacea (Kunth) Rchb. f. (Lit) T 13/ 15.1 29. Baskervilla sp. (Lit) T 8 8. Aa sp. (RV 2798) T 11 30. Batemannia colleyi Lindl. (RV 2047) 1.1/ 1.2 9. Aa sphaeroglossa Schltr. (Lit) T 15.1/ 15.2 31. Batemannia leferenzii Senghas (Lit) E 8 10. Aa trilobulata Schltr. (Lit) T 13/ 15.1 32. Beloglottis bicaudata (Ames) Garay (Lit) 8 11. Aa weddelliana (Rchb. f.) Schltr. (Lit) T E 15.2 33. Beloglottis boliviensis Schltr. (RV 2524, 2804) E 8 12. Ada brachypus (Rchb. f.) N.Williams (Lit) 8 34. Bletia catenulata Ruiz & Pav. (RV 465) T 1.1/ 1.2/ 1.4/ 7/ 9 13. Ada glumacea (Lindl.) N.Williams (Lit) 8 35. Bletia mandonii Schltr. (Lit) T E 8 14. Ada ocanensis (Lindl. ) N.Williams (RV 2846) 8 36. Bletia purpurea (Lam.) Dc. (Lit) 8 15. Adipe longicornis (Lindl.) M.Wolfe (RV 1462) 8 37. Brachionidium alpestre Luer & R.Vásquez (Lit) E 8 16. Aganisia boliviensis Rolfe (Lit) 38. Brachionidium diaphanum Luer & R.Vásquez (Lit) 8 17. Aganisia cyanea (Lindl.) Rchb. f. (Lit) 2 39. Brachionidium muscosum Luer & R.Vásquez (Lit) E 8 18. Altensteinia boliviensis Rolfe (Lit) T E 15.2 40. Brachionidium tuberculatum Lindl. (Lit) 8 19. Altensteinia calcarata Rchb. f. (Lit) 13/ 15.1 41. Brachionidium uxorium Luer & R.Vásquez (Lit) E 8 20. Altensteinia fimbriata Kunth (Lit) T 15.2 42. Brachionidium vasquezii Luer (Lit) E 8 21. Altensteinia marginata Rchb. f. (Lit) T 15.2 43. Brassavola cebolleta Rchb. f. (RV 48) 9 22. Anguloa virginalis Linden (RV 2839) 8 44. Brassavola martiana Lindl. (Lit) 2 Org. Divers. Evol. 3, Electr. Suppl. 4 (2003) Vásquez et al. Preliminary list of Bolivian Orchid species 2 45. Brassavola perrinii Lindl. (RV 193) T 9 99. Catasetum saccatum Lindl. (RV 24, 873, 956, 2197, 2226, 46. Brassia caudata (L.) Lindl. (RV 78, 1150) 1.1/ 1.2 2248, 2285) 1.4/ 8 47. Brassia huebneri Schltr. (Lit) 1.1/ 1.2 100. Catasetum semicirculatum Miranda (RV 953, 2510) 5 48. Brassia neglecta Rchb. f. (RV 2546, 2826) 1.1/ 1.2 101. Catasetum sp. (RV 2773, 2774?) E 1.3 49. Brassia signata Rchb. f. (Lit) 1.1/ 1.2 102. Catasetum spitzii Hoehne (RV 942, 993, 1818) 6 50. Brassia thyrsodes Rchb. f. (RV 2162) T 9 103. Cattleya luteola Lindl. (RV 1844) 1.1/ 1.2 51. Buchtienia boliviensis Schltr. (RV 1676) T E 1.1/ 1.2 104. Cattleya nobilior Rchb. f. (Lit) T 5 52. Buesiella vasquezii Christenson (RV 122) E 8 105. Cattleya violacea (Kunth) Rolfe (Lit) 1.4/ 2/ 6 53. Buesiella sp. (RV 894) 8 106. Chaubardia heteroclita (P.& E.) Dodson & Bennett (Lit) 8 54. Bulbophyllum amazonicum Schltr. (Lit) 107. Chaubardia klugii (C. Schweinf.) Garay (Lit) 1.1/ 1.2/ 8 55. Bulbophyllum bolivianum Schltr. (Lit) E 8 108. Chaubardia surinamensis Rchb. f. (Lit) 1.1/ 1.2 56. Bulbophyllum exaltatum Lindl. (RV 1838, 2807) 8 109. Chloraea biserialis Griseb. (Lit) 11 57. Bulbophyllum incanum Kraenzl. (Lit) 8 110. Chloraea boliviana (Rchb. f.) Kraenzl. (Lit) T E 11 58. Bulbophyllum insectiferum Barb. Rodr. (Lit) 5 111. Chloraea calantha Kraenzl. (Lit) T 11 59. Bulbophyllum morenoi Dodson & R.Vásquez (Lit) T E 5 112. Chloraea fiebrigiana Kraenzl. (Lit) T 11 60. Bulbophyllum pachyrhachis (A. Rich.) Griseb. (RV 2049) 8 113. Chloraea laxiflora Hauman (Lit) T 11 61. Bulbophyllum setigerum Lindl. (Lit) 114. Chloraea multilineolata C. Schweinf. (Lit) T 11 62. Bulbophyllum tricolor L.B. Smith & Harris (Lit) E 8 115. Chloraea reticulata Schltr. (Lit) T 11 63. Bulbophyllum weberbauerianum Kraenzl. (RV 1199, 1820, 116. Chloraea sp. (RV 3525) T 11 2783) 8 117. Chloraea undulata Raimondi ex Colunga (Lit) T 11 64. Bulbophyllum sp. (RV 1820) 9 118. Chondrorhyncha fosterae Dodson (Lit) E 8 65. Bulbophyllum sp. (RV 2806) 1.1/ 1.2 119. Chondrorhyncha luerorum R.Vásquez & Dodson (RV 1003) E 8 66. Bulbophyllum sp. (RV 2807) 1.1/ 1.2 120. Chysis bruennowiana Rchb. f. & Warsc. (RV 1167, 2854) 67. Bulbophyllum sp. (RV 4020) 11 1.1/ 1.2 68. Caluera sp. (Lit) 12 121. Cischweinfia kroemeri R.Vásquez & Dodson (Lit) E 8 69. Campylocentrum apiculatum Schltr. (Lit) 1.1/ 1.2 122. Cischweinfia parva (C. Schweinf.) Dressler & Williams (Lit) 8 70. Campylocentrum fasciola (Lindl.) Cogn. (Lit) 123. Cleistes paranaensis (Barb. Rodr.) Schltr. (Lit) T 6 71. Campylocentrum grisebachii Cogn. (RV 3291) 11 124. Cleistes rosea Lindl. (Lit) T 8 72. Campylocentrum kunzei Cogn. (Lit) E 8 125. Coccineorchis cernua (Lindl.) Garay (Lit) T 8 73. Campylocentrum micranthum (Lindl.) Rolfe (RV 2814) 9 126. Cochleanthes palatina Senghas (RV 1555, 1607) 1.1/ 1.2 74. Campylocentrum minutum C. Schweinf. (RV 1620, 2813) 9 127. Cochleanthes sp. (Lit) 1.1/ 1.2 75. Campylocentrum neglectum (Rchb. f. & Warm.) Cogn. (Lit) 9/ 7/ 5 128. Cochlioda beyrodtiana Schltr. (RV2734) 8 76. Campylocentrum poeppigii (Rchb. f.) Rolfe (RV 1595) 1.4 129. Cochlioda miniata (L.) Linden (RV130) 8 77. Campylocentrum robustum Cogn. (Lit) 130. Cochlioda vulcanica (Rchb. f.) Benth. & Hook. f. ex B.D. Jacks. 78. Campylocentrum sp. (RV 3293) 1.4 (Lit) 8 79. Capanemia micromera Barb. Rodr. (Lit) 9 131. Comparettia coccinea Lindl. (Lit) 8 80. Capanemia superflua (Rchb. f.) Garay (Lit) 9 132. Comparettia falcata Poepp. & Endl. (Lit) 8 81. Catasetum appendiculatum Schltr. (RV 955, 1243, 3707) 5 133. Comparettia macroplectron Rchb. f. (Lit) 8 82. Catasetum barbatum Lindl. cf. (RV 1129) 1.4/ 5 134. Comparettia splendens Schltr. (Lit) 8 83. Catasetum buchtienii Kraenzl. (RV 899) E 1.1/ 1.2 135. Coryanthes gerlachiana Senghas & Seeger (Lit) E 1.1/ 1.2 84. Catasetum callosum Lindl. (RV 1639, 2838) 1.3 136. Coryanthes leferenziorum Gerlach, Senghas & Seeger (Lit) E 85. Catasetum cochabambanum Dodson & R. Vásquez (RV 167, 1.1/ 1.2 182) E 8 137. Coryanthes macrantha (Hook.) Hook. (RV 2032, 2833) 1.1/ 1.2 86. Catasetum cristatum Lindl. (Lit) 1.4 138. Coryanthes thivii Kropf & Seeger (RV 4443) 1.1 87. Catasetum denticulatum Miranda (RV 2509) 1.4 139. Coryanthes vasquezii Dodson (RV 2327, 2856) E 1.1/ 1.2 88. Catasetum discolor Lindl. (RV 948, 2282. 2506) T 1.4/ 5 140. Corymborkis flava (Sw.) O. Kuntze (I.V.2044) T 1.4 89. Catasetum duplicisculatum Senghas (RV 869, 1227, 1375) E 8 141. Corymborkis sp. (Lit) 5 90. Catasetum fimbriatum (Morren) Lindl. (RV 23, 897, 1843, 142. Cranichis ciliata (Kunth) Kunth (RV 792) T 8 2610, 2630, 3434) 5/ 7 143. Cranichis diphylla Sw. (RV 2180) T 8 91. Catasetum fuchsii Dodson & R.Vásquez (RV 14, 2612) E 5 144. Cranichis fertilis (Lehm. & Kraenzl.) Schltr. (RV 1825) T 8 92. Catasetum gnomus Lindl. & Rchb. f. (RV 1226, 1482, 3251) 1.3 145. Cranichis garayana Dodson & R.Vásquez (RV 612) T E 8 93. Catasetum interhomesianum R. Vásquez & Dodson (RV 146. Cranichis mandonii Schltr. (LT) T E 8 2872) E 1.3 147. Cranichis multiflora (Poepp. & Endl.) Cogn. (RV 670) 94. Catasetum justinianum R. Vásquez & Dodson (RV 2207, 148. Cranichis muscosa Sw. (Lit) T 8 2458) E 1.4 149. Cranichis sp. (RV 623) T 1.1/ 1.2 95. Catasetum kempffii Dodson & R. Vásquez (RV 800, 915, 150. Cranichis sp. (RV 939) T 5 1187, 2611, 3531) E 1.1/ 1.2/ 5 151.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Generic and Subtribal Relationships in Neotropical Cymbidieae (Orchidaceae) Based on Matk/Ycf1 Plastid Data
    LANKESTERIANA 13(3): 375—392. 2014. I N V I T E D P A P E R* GENERIC AND SUBTRIBAL RELATIONSHIPS IN NEOTROPICAL CYMBIDIEAE (ORCHIDACEAE) BASED ON MATK/YCF1 PLASTID DATA W. MARK WHITTEN1,2, KURT M. NEUBIG1 & N. H. WILLIAMS1 1Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611-7800 USA 2Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Relationships among all subtribes of Neotropical Cymbidieae (Orchidaceae) were estimated using combined matK/ycf1 plastid sequence data for 289 taxa. The matrix was analyzed using RAxML. Bootstrap (BS) analyses yield 100% BS support for all subtribes except Stanhopeinae (87%). Generic relationships within subtribes are highly resolved and are generally congruent with those presented in previous studies and as summarized in Genera Orchidacearum. Relationships among subtribes are largely unresolved. The Szlachetko generic classification of Maxillariinae is not supported. A new combination is made for Maxillaria cacaoensis J.T.Atwood in Camaridium. KEY WORDS: Orchidaceae, Cymbidieae, Maxillariinae, matK, ycf1, phylogenetics, Camaridium, Maxillaria cacaoensis, Vargasiella Cymbidieae include many of the showiest align nrITS sequences across the entire tribe was Neotropical epiphytic orchids and an unparalleled unrealistic due to high levels of sequence divergence, diversity in floral rewards and pollination systems. and instead to concentrate our efforts on assembling Many researchers have posed questions such as a larger plastid data set based on two regions (matK “How many times and when has male euglossine and ycf1) that are among the most variable plastid bee pollination evolved?”(Ramírez et al. 2011), or exon regions and can be aligned with minimal “How many times have oil-reward flowers evolved?” ambiguity across broad taxonomic spans.
    [Show full text]
  • GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation
    GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence of Asparagus (Asparagus Officinalis L.) and Its Phy- Logenetic Positon Within Asparagales
    Central International Journal of Plant Biology & Research Bringing Excellence in Open Access Research Note *Corresponding author Wentao Sheng, Department of Biological Technology, Nanchang Normal University, Nanchang 330032, The Complete Chloroplast Jiangxi, China, Tel: 86-0791-87619332; Fax: 86-0791- 87619332; Email: Submitted: 14 September 2017 Genome Sequence of Accepted: 09 October 2017 Published: 10 October 2017 Asparagus (Asparagus ISSN: 2333-6668 Copyright © 2017 Sheng et al. officinalis L.) and its OPEN ACCESS Keywords Phylogenetic Positon within • Asparagus officinalis L • Chloroplast genome • Phylogenomic evolution Asparagales • Asparagales Wentao Sheng*, Xuewen Chai, Yousheng Rao, Xutang, Tu, and Shangguang Du Department of Biological Technology, Nanchang Normal University, China Abstract Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) is a horticultural homology of medicine and food with health care. The entire chloroplast (cp) genome of asparagus was sequenced with Hiseq4000 platform. The complete cp genome maps a circular molecule of 156,699bp built with a quadripartite organization: two inverted repeats (IRs) of 26,531bp, separated by a large single copy (LSC) sequence of 84,999bp and a small single copy (SSC) sequence of 18,638bp. A total of 112 genes comprising of 78 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNAs and 4 rRNAs were successfully annotated, 17 of which included introns. The identity, number and GC content of asparagus cp genes were similar to those of other asparagus species genomes. Analysis revealed 81 simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci, most composed of A or T, contributing to a bias in base composition. A maximum likelihood phylogenomic evolution analysis showed that asparagus was closely related to Polygonatum cyrtonema that belonged to the genus Asparagales.
    [Show full text]
  • E29695d2fc942b3642b5dc68ca
    ISSN 1409-3871 VOL. 9, No. 1—2 AUGUST 2009 Orchids and orchidology in Central America: 500 years of history CARLOS OSSENBACH INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORCHIDOLOGY LANKESTERIANA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORCHIDOLOGY Copyright © 2009 Lankester Botanical Garden, University of Costa Rica Effective publication date: August 30, 2009 Layout: Jardín Botánico Lankester. Cover: Chichiltic tepetlauxochitl (Laelia speciosa), from Francisco Hernández, Rerum Medicarum Novae Hispaniae Thesaurus, Rome, Jacobus Mascardus, 1628. Printer: Litografía Ediciones Sanabria S.A. Printed copies: 500 Printed in Costa Rica / Impreso en Costa Rica R Lankesteriana / International Journal on Orchidology No. 1 (2001)-- . -- San José, Costa Rica: Editorial Universidad de Costa Rica, 2001-- v. ISSN-1409-3871 1. Botánica - Publicaciones periódicas, 2. Publicaciones periódicas costarricenses LANKESTERIANA i TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Geographical and historical scope of this study 1 Political history of Central America 3 Central America: biodiversity and phytogeography 7 Orchids in the prehispanic period 10 The area of influence of the Chibcha culture 10 The northern region of Central America before the Spanish conquest 11 Orchids in the cultures of Mayas and Aztecs 15 The history of Vanilla 16 From the Codex Badianus to Carl von Linné 26 The Codex Badianus 26 The expedition of Francisco Hernández to New Spain (1570-1577) 26 A new dark age 28 The “English American” — the journey through Mexico and Central America of Thomas Gage (1625-1637) 31 The renaissance of science
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Discyphus
    Phytotaxa 173 (2): 127–139 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.173.2.3 Phylogenetic relationships of Discyphus scopulariae (Orchidaceae, Cranichideae) inferred from plastid and nuclear DNA sequences: evidence supporting recognition of a new subtribe, Discyphinae GERARDO A. SALAZAR1, CÁSSIO VAN DEN BERG2 & ALEX POPOVKIN3 1Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-367, 04510 México, Distrito Federal, México; E-mail: [email protected] 2Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Av. Transnordestina s.n., 44036-900, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil 3Fazenda Rio do Negro, Entre Rios, Bahia, Brazil Abstract The monospecific genus Discyphus, previously considered a member of Spiranthinae (Orchidoideae: Cranichideae), displays both vegetative and floral morphological peculiarities that are out of place in that subtribe. These include a single, sessile, cordate leaf that clasps the base of the inflorescence and lies flat on the substrate, petals that are long-decurrent on the column, labellum margins free from sides of the column and a column provided with two separate, cup-shaped stigmatic areas. Because of its morphological uniqueness, the phylogenetic relationships of Discyphus have been considered obscure. In this study, we analyse nucleotide sequences of plastid and nuclear DNA under maximum parsimony
    [Show full text]
  • Die Orchidaceengattungen Altensteinia H. B. Et Kth., Aa Rchb
    Die Orchidaceen-Gattungen Altensteinia H. B. et Kth., Aa. Rchb. 147 XXXII. Die Orchidaceen-Gattungen Altensteinia H. B. et Kth., Aa Rchb. f. u. Myrosmodes Rchb. f. Von R. Schlechter. (Originalarbeit.) Die Gattung AZtensteinia H. B. et Kth. wurde von den Autoren im Jahre 1815 in ihren ,Nova Genera et Species" im Band I auf Seite 332 beschrieben und mit zwei Arten, A. fimbriata H. B. et Kth. auf Tafel 72 und A. pilifera H. €3. et Kth. auf Tafel 73, abgebildet. Schon bei ober- flachlicher Betrachtung Tallt bei diesen beiden Arten der grosse Unter- schied auf, welchsr zwischen ihnen zu finden ist. Die einzelnen Teile des Perigoniums sowohl wie die Kolumna sind so ganzlich verschieden, dass man bald auf den Gedanken kommen muss, es hier mit zwei ver- schiedenen Gattungen zu tun zu haben. Im Jahre 1822 wurde dann von Kunth in seiner ,Synopsis" vol. I, p. 325 eine dritte Art der Gattuhg als Altensteinia paleacea Klh. beigefiigt, welche friiher als Ophrys paleacea H. B. et Kth. von den drei Autoren der Gattung Altensteink in dem oben zitierten Werke auf p. 334, also einige Seiten dahinter, veroffentlicht war. Dadurch wurde nun der Gattungscharakter noch ganz erheblich erweitert, denn diese Art ist in ihrer Bliitenstruktur ebenso verschieden von den beiden ersten Arten, wie diese untereinander. Als Lindley im Jahre 1840 in seinen ,Genera and Species of Orchidaceous Plants" die Gattung AZtensteinia H. B. et Kth. behandelte, war ihm nur die zuletzt publizierte A. paleacea Kth. bekannt, und daher ist es wohl erklarlich, dass er die drei Arten nicht generisch trennte, sondern nur bei A.
    [Show full text]
  • Status De Conservação Da Polinizadora Mutualista Euglossa Annectans Dressler (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossina) E Da Orquídea
    Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados Faculdade de Ciências Biológicas e Ambientais Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade Status de conservação da polinizadora mutualista Euglossa annectans Dressler (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossina) e da orquídea endêmica Houlletia brocklehurstiana (Lindl.) (Orchidaceae, Epidendroideae, Stanhopeinae) na Mata Atlântica. Abelha da orquídea ou orquídea da abelha? Felipe Varussa de Oliveira Lima Dourados-MS Agosto 2015 Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados Faculdade de Ciências Biológicas e Ambientais Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade Felipe Varussa de Oliveira Lima STATUS DE CONSERVAÇÃO DA POLINIZADORA MUTUALISTA Euglossa annectans Dressler (HYMENOPTERA, APIDAE, EUGLOSSINA) E DA ORQUÍDEA ENDÊMICA Houlletia brocklehurstiana (Lindl.) (ORCHIDACEAE, EPIDENDROIDEAE, STANHOPEINAE) NA MATA ATLÂNTICA. ABELHA DA ORQUÍDEA OU ORQUÍDEA DA ABELHA? Tese apresentada à Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (UFGD), como parte dos requisitos exigidos para obtenção do título de DOUTOR EM ENTOMOLOGIA E CONSERVAÇÃO DA BIODIVERSIDADE. Área de Concentração: Biodiversidade e Conservação. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Rogério Silvestre Dourados-MS Agosto 2015 Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP). L732s Lima, Felipe Varussa de Oliveira. Status de conservação da polinizadora mutualista Euglossa annectans, Dressler (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossina) e da orquídea endêmica Houlletia brocklehurstiana (Lindl.) (Orchidaceae, Epidendroideae, Stanhopeinae) na Mata Atlântica: abelha da orquídea ou orquídea da abelha? / Felipe Varussa de Oliveira Lima. – Dourados, MS: UFGD, 2015. 87f. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Rogério Silvestre. Tese (Doutorado em Entomologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade) – Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados. 1. Mata Atlântica. 2. Abelhas. 3. Euglossina. 4. Conservação. 5. Modelo de distribuição. I. Título. CDD – 595.799 Ficha catalográfica elaborada pela Biblioteca Central – UFGD. ©Todos os direitos reservados.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Genome Size, and Chromosome Evolution of Asparagales J
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 22 | Issue 1 Article 24 2006 Phylogeny, Genome Size, and Chromosome Evolution of Asparagales J. Chris Pires University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Missouri Ivan J. Maureira University of Wisconsin-Madison Thomas J. Givnish University of Wisconsin-Madison Kenneth J. Systma University of Wisconsin-Madison Ole Seberg University of Copenhagen; Natural History Musem of Denmark See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Pires, J. Chris; Maureira, Ivan J.; Givnish, Thomas J.; Systma, Kenneth J.; Seberg, Ole; Peterson, Gitte; Davis, Jerrold I.; Stevenson, Dennis W.; Rudall, Paula J.; Fay, Michael F.; and Chase, Mark W. (2006) "Phylogeny, Genome Size, and Chromosome Evolution of Asparagales," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 22: Iss. 1, Article 24. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/24 Phylogeny, Genome Size, and Chromosome Evolution of Asparagales Authors J. Chris Pires, Ivan J. Maureira, Thomas J. Givnish, Kenneth J. Systma, Ole Seberg, Gitte Peterson, Jerrold I. Davis, Dennis W. Stevenson, Paula J. Rudall, Michael F. Fay, and Mark W. Chase This article is available in Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/ 24 Asparagales ~£~2COTSgy and Evolution Excluding Poales Aliso 22, pp. 287-304 © 2006, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PHYLOGENY, GENOME SIZE, AND CHROMOSOME EVOLUTION OF ASPARAGALES 1 7 8 1 3 9 J. CHRIS PIRES, • • IVAN J. MAUREIRA, THOMAS J. GIVNISH, 2 KENNETH J. SYTSMA, 2 OLE SEBERG, · 9 4 6 GITTE PETERSEN, 3· JERROLD I DAVIS, DENNIS W.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Discyphus Scopulariae
    Phytotaxa 173 (2): 127–139 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.173.2.3 Phylogenetic relationships of Discyphus scopulariae (Orchidaceae, Cranichideae) inferred from plastid and nuclear DNA sequences: evidence supporting recognition of a new subtribe, Discyphinae GERARDO A. SALAZAR1, CÁSSIO VAN DEN BERG2 & ALEX POPOVKIN3 1Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-367, 04510 México, Distrito Federal, México; E-mail: [email protected] 2Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Av. Transnordestina s.n., 44036-900, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil 3Fazenda Rio do Negro, Entre Rios, Bahia, Brazil Abstract The monospecific genus Discyphus, previously considered a member of Spiranthinae (Orchidoideae: Cranichideae), displays both vegetative and floral morphological peculiarities that are out of place in that subtribe. These include a single, sessile, cordate leaf that clasps the base of the inflorescence and lies flat on the substrate, petals that are long-decurrent on the column, labellum margins free from sides of the column and a column provided with two separate, cup-shaped stigmatic areas. Because of its morphological uniqueness, the phylogenetic relationships of Discyphus have been considered obscure. In this study, we analyse nucleotide sequences of plastid and nuclear DNA under maximum parsimony
    [Show full text]
  • Flower Flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) of Philippines, Solomon Islands, Wallacea and New Guinea
    THOMPSON, F.C., MENGUAL, X., YOUNG, A.D. & SKEVINGSTON, J.H.: Flower flies of Philippines, Solomon Islands, Wallacea ... (Plates 167-172) Flower flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) of Philippines, Solomon Islands, Wallacea and New Guinea F. CHRISTIAN THOMPSON 1, XIMO MENGUAL 2, ANDREW D. YOUNG 3, JEFFREY H. SKEVINGTON 3 1 – Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.; e-mail: [email protected] 2 – Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz-Institut für Biodiversität der Tiere, Adenauerallee 160, D–53113, Bonn, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] 3 – Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri- Food Canada, K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada and Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; e-mails: [email protected] (corresponding author), [email protected] Abstract: The flower flies of the Philippines, Solomon Islands, Wallacea and New Guinea are reviewed. An overview of the family is given followed by a key to the genera with a synopsis of each genus. Two new combinations are made: Matsumyia cyaniventris (Sack, 1926) comb. nov. (formerly Criorhina cyaniventris) and Citrogramma calceata (Sack, 1926) comb. nov. (formerly Xanthogramma calceata). Key words: Diptera, Brachycera, Syrphidae, Philippines, Wallacea, New Guinea, Solomon Islands, identification key, Indomalayan (Oriental) Region. Introduction Fully winged; usually with holoptic males (Fig. 5, plate 169 fig. 3, plate 169 fig. 7); females (Fig. 5, Flower flies are an abundant and critical com- plate 170 fig. 7, plate 171 fig. 1) and some males ponent of terrestrial ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Morfoanatomía En Cranichideae (Orchidaceae) De La Estación Loma Redonda Del Parque Nacional “Sierra Nevada”, Mérida, Venezuela
    LANKESTERIANA 12(1): 61—75. 2012. MorfoanatomÍA EN CRANICHIDEAE (ORCHIDACEAE) DE LA EstaciÓN LOMA REDONDA DEL PARQUE NACIONAL “SIERRA NevaDA”, MéRIDA, VENEZUELA BLANCA A. DUGARTE CORREDOR1,2 & REBECA LUQUE ARIAS1 1 Centro Jardín Botánico de Mérida, Facultad de Ciencias. Universidad de los Andes, Mérida, estado Mérida, 5101, Venezuela 2 Autor para correspondencia: [email protected] RESUMEN. Se realizó un estudio morfoanatómico de los órganos vegetativos y del pedúnculo de tres representantes de la subtribu Cranichidinae s.l. (Orchidaceae): Aa paleacea, Myrosmodes paludosa y Pterichis multiflora, de la estación Loma Redonda del Teleférico de Mérida, del Parque Nacional Sierra Nevada. Estas tres especies se estudiaron con el fin de determinar la posible existencia de caracteres diagnósticos así como la presencia de caracteres adaptativos al páramo. Se recolectaron plantas adultas. Se determinaron caracteres comunes: raíces rollizas, velamen y exodermis uniestratificado, exodermis con engrosamientos escalareiformes en las paredes radiales, espirantosomas en la corteza y hojas glabras arrosetadas. Se reporta por primera vez mesófilo diferenciado en Cranichideae. Se determinaron los siguientes caracteres diagnósticos: grosor de la corteza radicular; número de corridas de células de la empalizada y esponjoso; diferentes tipos de estelas en el pedúnculo. Algunos de estos caracteres se consideran adaptativos al ambiente: raíces rollizas, corteza compacta; hojas pequeñas y brillantes de cutícula gruesa, desarrollo de empalizada; pedúnculo con epidermis y cutícula gruesa Se considera Myrosmodes paludosa como la más xeromórfica. Se presenta una clave de caracteres morfológicos y otra de caracteres anatómicos. ABSTRACT. A morpho-anatomic study of vegetative organs and peduncle was conducted in three representatives of the subtribe Cranichidinae s.l.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Scan Data
    Selbyana 29(1): 69-86. 2008. THE ORCHID POLLINARIA COLLECTION AT LANKESTER BOTANICAL GARDEN, UNIVERSITY OF COSTA RICA FRANCO PUPULIN* Lankester Botanical Garden, University of Costa Rica. P.O. Box 1031-7050 Cartago, Costa Rica, CA Angel Andreetta Research Center on Andean Orchids, University Alfredo Perez Guerrero, Extension Gualaceo, Ecuador Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, MA, USA The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens, Sarasota, FL, USA Email: [email protected] ADAM KARREMANS Lankester Botanical Garden, University of Costa Rica. P.O. Box 1031-7050 Cartago, Costa Rica, CA Angel Andreetta Research Center on Andean Orchids, University Alfredo Perez Guerrero, Extension Gualaceo, Ecuador ABSTRACT. The relevance of pollinaria study in orchid systematics and reproductive biology is summa­ rized. The Orchid Pollinaria Collection and the associate database of Lankester Botanical Garden, University of Costa Rica, are presented. The collection includes 496 pollinaria, belonging to 312 species in 94 genera, with particular emphasis on Neotropical taxa of the tribe Cymbidieae (Epidendroideae). The associated database includes digital images of the pollinaria and is progressively made available to the general public through EPIDENDRA, the online taxonomic and nomenclatural database of Lankester Botanical Garden. Examples are given of the use of the pollinaria collection by researchers of the Center in a broad range of systematic applications. Key words: Orchid pollinaria, systematic botany, pollination biology, orchid pollinaria collection,
    [Show full text]