Intersectionality, Tragedy, and William Shakespeare Anna Flores Union College - Schenectady, NY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Intersectionality, Tragedy, and William Shakespeare Anna Flores Union College - Schenectady, NY Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2015 “Listen to Many”: Intersectionality, Tragedy, and William Shakespeare Anna Flores Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, and the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Recommended Citation Flores, Anna, "“Listen to Many”: Intersectionality, Tragedy, and William Shakespeare" (2015). Honors Theses. 302. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/302 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Listen to Many”: Intersectionality, Tragedy, and William Shakespeare Anna Flores EGL 401/402 Honors Thesis, Department of English Union College March 2015 _____________________________ Jillmarie Murphy Department of English Supervising Professor _____________________________ Patricia Wareh Department of English Second Reader 1 Abstract “Listen to Many”: Intersectionality, Tragedy, and William Shakespeare Anna Flores, BA English Union College, 2015 Supervisor: Jillmarie Murphy Centuries after his own lifetime, William Shakespeare dominates the Western canon and continues to have a profound effect on Western society. As the values of that society shift and social movements progress, so too must critical reception of Shakespeare's work. The purpose of this thesis is to reexamine Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida (1601), Othello (1604), and Antony and Cleopatra (1606) through a feminist lens in order to expose the larger societal issues addressed within the play. This thesis draws on Intersectionality, a modern branch of feminism, to discuss sexism, racism, classism, and homophobia within Shakespeare’s texts and the way in which they function to create the tragic ending of each play. 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents……………………………………….. Acknowledgments………………………………………. Introduction……………………………………………... Chapter 1: “What May You Be?”: The Construction of Self-Hatred in Shakespeare's Othello………………………………………………… Chapter 2: “False, false, false!”: Sexual Economics and Gender Performance in Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida……………… Chapter 3: “Easy Ways to Die”: Bodied Politics in Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra……………………………………………… Coda…………………………………………………….. Bibliography…………………………………………….. Endnotes………………………………………………….. 3 Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank my parents for their endless love and support, and their heartfelt interest in my education. They never let me forget how proud they are, and it means the world. I would also like to thank my brothers for always asking, “What are you doing this weekend?” even though they knew the answer was, “Thesis.” I would like to thank my best friend, Erin Franklin, for remaining my best friend during this trying time. I sincerely thank Professor Jillmarie Murphy, my thesis advisor, for her support, encouragement, and positive energy. I cannot put in to words how wonderful she is, but I am certain the other thesis classes were robbed. I am also very grateful to Professor Patricia Wareh, my second reader, for her patience, kindness, and expertise. Finally, I would like to thank Thomas Arcuri, Henry Clayton, Melissa Harvey, Meghan Hill, Caitlin Lentlie, and Ethan Pearce. I am truly indebted to each of them for making this project a rewarding experience. 4 Introduction William Shakespeare's Othello, Troilus and Cressida, and Antony and Cleopatra feature the destruction of their lead characters. This destruction comes about at the hands of individuals, but it is also symptomatic of a larger, societal failing. The purpose of this thesis is to examine the power structures at work within these plays, particularly the systems of oppression inherent in patriarchal societies. Patriarchal societies are comprised of a male-dominated social order, the values of which permeate both organized society and individual relationships. Each of the plays under consideration demonstrates the destructive effects of patriarchal values, which result in the debasement and marginalization of all those who are not part of the dominant group. Shakespeare's plays use European structures in which wealthy, white males are the dominant figures and all others fall into various degrees of subordination and oppression. The way this systematic oppression works is through socialization begun at birth in order to inculcate toxic masculinity in males and passive femininity in females. Similarly, racial, gender and class prejudices are social constructs, the creation of which results in tragedy. Rather than the genre, I have chosen to focus on Jan Kott's definition of tragedy: “the annihilation of laughter” (140). Regardless of how these plays are categorized, by the end of the plays, all humor is eliminated. The unequal treatment of women, minorities and lower classes within these plays demonstrates the danger of a patriarchy and cries out for social reform. In order to substantiate my argument that the values instilled in a patriarchal society cause the tragic ending of these plays, I employ intersectionality, a branch of feminist theory. The term intersectionality was coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw in the 5 1990s in her article, “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color”. Her article provides insight into the origin and application of intersectionality, a feminist approach founded by women of color who felt underrepresented in mainstream feminism (Collins 450). Crenshaw uses this method to draw women of color and other marginalized women into feminist discussion and analyze violence specifically against women of color. Catharine A. MacKinnon provides a tidy definition of intersectionality, explaining that this method “both notices and contends with the realities of multiple inequalities as it thinks about 'the interaction of' those inequalities in a way that captures the distinctive dynamics at their multidimensional interface” (1019). Intersectionality can be defined as a method that acknowledges that inequality does not exist in a vacuum and that people are many things at once. Therefore, the female experience cannot be boiled down to the experience of any one woman, or even any particular group of women. Furthermore, while intersectional feminism is primarily concerned with women, this method applies to all groups marginalized under a patriarchal order. Intersectionality also contends with the fact that oppression is not the same for every subjugated group. Those whose identities are composed of multiple oppressed or marginalized groups face oppression greater than the sum of its parts. So while experiences of oppression and marginalization overlap, the different aspects of a person's identity combine to form a unique experience. Intersectionality is a method of viewing the world in a way that reveals connections that are frequently overlooked. Intersectionality has only recently been adopted into feminist criticism, and therefore is a relatively new theoretical methodology within feminism. By integrating 6 intersectional feminism into Shakespearean criticism, I endeavor to shift the way feminists view Shakespeare's works. Since Shakespeare's influence is widespread and he is considered to be part of the Western canon, the way his works are viewed affects academia and feminist criticism as a whole. If any author is accredited with shaping Western culture, it is Shakespeare. Therefore, because Shakespeare is such a major figure in the shaping of Western culture, my aim is to help shift the academic discussion of the female characters within these three plays. Chapter 1, “'What May You Be?': The Construction of Self-Hatred in Shakespeare's Othello,” focuses on the creation of a patriarchal society in Othello, since the play initially begins with Othello as a successful and well-respected general. Iago introduces the concepts of 'Other' as well as racial and gender stereotypes. These concepts become internalized within the characters, eventually turning them into the very things Iago accused them of being. For Othello, this is a sexual predator and an abuser toward his wife, while for Desdemona it is a submissive woman without a voice. Therefore, Othello demonstrates that there are many ways in which a male-dominated society can be formed and, more importantly, how that society affects those oppressed by it. Othello and Desdemona's great tragedy is one of miscommunication. While the two begin the play in perfect synchronization, as their relationship deteriorates, so does their ability to understand one another. Desdemona is in a similar position, as she begins the play with a strong voice and steadily loses it as Othello is turned against her. This play is an important part of the thesis because it will involve not only the way social, political, and economic hierarchies work against Desdemona, but it will integrate a reading of her character with a reading of Othello's. Critics rarely address both characters with equal 7 attention, rather choosing one as their focus. Intersectionality, however, demands that attention be paid to Othello's status as a minority within Venetian society and how that affects the tragedy. Chapter 2, “'False, false, false!': Sexual Economics and Gender Performance in Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida” contends with a
Recommended publications
  • Verdi Otello
    VERDI OTELLO RICCARDO MUTI CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ALEKSANDRS ANTONENKO KRASSIMIRA STOYANOVA CARLO GUELFI CHICAGO SYMPHONY CHORUS / DUAIN WOLFE Giuseppe Verdi (1813-1901) OTELLO CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA RICCARDO MUTI 3 verdi OTELLO Riccardo Muti, conductor Chicago Symphony Orchestra Otello (1887) Opera in four acts Music BY Giuseppe Verdi LIBretto Based on Shakespeare’S tragedy Othello, BY Arrigo Boito Othello, a Moor, general of the Venetian forces .........................Aleksandrs Antonenko Tenor Iago, his ensign .........................................................................Carlo Guelfi Baritone Cassio, a captain .......................................................................Juan Francisco Gatell Tenor Roderigo, a Venetian gentleman ................................................Michael Spyres Tenor Lodovico, ambassador of the Venetian Republic .......................Eric Owens Bass-baritone Montano, Otello’s predecessor as governor of Cyprus ..............Paolo Battaglia Bass A Herald ....................................................................................David Govertsen Bass Desdemona, wife of Otello ........................................................Krassimira Stoyanova Soprano Emilia, wife of Iago ....................................................................BarBara DI Castri Mezzo-soprano Soldiers and sailors of the Venetian Republic; Venetian ladies and gentlemen; Cypriot men, women, and children; men of the Greek, Dalmatian, and Albanian armies; an innkeeper and his four servers;
    [Show full text]
  • The Aesthetics of Railing: Troilus and Cressida and Coriolanus
    The Aesthetics of Railing:Troilus and Cressida and Coriolanus Maria Teresa Micaela Prendergast The College of Wooster Cet essai explore comment Shakespeare utilise la rhétorique des insultes cruelles et for- tement métaphoriques des débuts de la modernité afin de réaliser une rivalité agressive entre le déclinant idéal aristocratique élisabéthain du sang et du langage épique d’une part, et le théâtre satirique en émergence d’autre part. Ce type de théâtre se justifie en associant le guerrier aristocratique à un corps suintant, efféminé, et malade. Cet essai se concentre en particulier sur les pièces Troilus and Cressida et Coriolanus, qui éta- blissent un fort lien entre la manifestation de maladies internes sur la peau et la perte d’autonomie masculine. Dans Troilus and Cressida, Thersites, incarnant le personnage du fou, domine la pièce avec ses discours vicieux qui transforment sur le plan rhétorique le personnage héroïque de l’aristocrate masculin en une créature abjecte. Parallèlement, Coriolan, en fort contraste avec Thersites, est un guerrier autonome, qui néanmoins sou- tient l’opinion de Thersites que le spectacle théâtral, ainsi que la fréquentation des gens du peuple dégradent les idéaux guerriers aristocratiques. Les deux pièces suggèrent que c’est à travers une langue caustique et scatologique de l’insulte, de pair avec une destruction rhétorique des idéaux de l’aristocratie guerrière, que le théâtre britannique du début du dix-septième siècle remplace une esthétique traditionnelle de l’élite faite de sang héroïque par une célébration de la puissance rhétorique des croûtes et des éruptions cutanées. ike many of his Elizabethan and Jacobean contemporaries, Shakespeare was Lcaught up in the art of railing.
    [Show full text]
  • Jealousy and Destruction in William Shakespeare's
    Crossing the Border: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Volume 4; Number 1; 15 April 2016 ISSN 2350-8752 (Print); ISSN 2350-8922 (Online) JEALOUSY AND DESTRUCTION IN WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE’S OTHELLO Ram Prasad Rai (Nepal) ABSTRACT Othello is honest. He wants to establish an order and peace in the society. He falls in love with a white lady, Desdemona. Despite the discontentment of Desdemona’s father Brobantio, they marry each other. Iago, an evil-minded man, is not happy with the promotion of Cassio, a junior o! cer to Iago, to lieutenant’s post in support of the chief Othello. Iago becomes jealous to Cassio and plans to destroy the relation between Othello and Cassio in any way it is pos- sible. He uses Roderigo, a rejected suitor to Desdemona and Emilia, the innocent wife of Iago in his evil plot. Iago treacherously makes Desdemona’s handkerchief, a marriage gi" from Othello, reach in Cassio through Emilia. # en he notices Othello about the Apresence of the handkerchief in Cassio as an accusation of Desdemona’s falling in love with Cassio. In reality, both Cassio and Desdemona are innocent. # ey are honest and loyal to their moral position. But because of jealousy grown in Othello by Iago, Othello plans to murder his kind and truly loving wife and his dutiful junior o! cer Cassio. Othello kills Desdemona and Iago kills his wife Emilia as she discloses the reality about Iago’s evilness. Othello kills himself a" er he knows about Iago’s treachery. As a result, all the happiness, peace and love in the families of Othello and Iago get spoilt completely because of just jealousy upon each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Questions Troilus and Cressida D R a F T
    2012 Suggestions for Teaching Troilus and Cressida by William Shakespeare Before seeing/reading the play 1. Research the Trojan War? What was the source of the conflict? Who fought against whom? Who were the major players? How long did it last? What was the outcome? Who famously wrote about events in The Trojan War? These and other websites provide information: http://www.stanford.edu/~plomio/history.html http://www.timelessmyths.com/classical/trojanwar.html http://www.ancienthistory.about.com/cs/troyilium/a/trojanwar.htm 2. The Iliad is an epic poem written by Homer. What events are recounted in The Iliad? Who are the major characters in The Iliad? These and other websites provide information: http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iliad http://www.timelessmyths.com/classical/trojanwar.html#Iliad 3. Read Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyd, one of Shakespeare's sources for this play. These and other websites provide information: http://www.tkline.pgcc.net/PITBR/English/Chaucerhome.htm http://www.omacl.org/Troilus 4. According to the Random House Webster’s dictionary, status is “the position or rank of an individual in relation to others.” Describe some of the factors that determine an individual’s status. When and how can one’s status change? Describe situations in which status is important. Under what circumstances is status unimportant? What is the relationship of reputation to status? 5. I maintain that this question has nothing to do with the play. I would delete it, but I defer to someone else. Which members of the House of Atreus are associated with the Trojan War? Describe the part each plays.
    [Show full text]
  • No Fear Shakespeare – Othello (By Sparknotes, Transcription by Alex Woelffer) -1
    No Fear Shakespeare – Othello (by SparkNotes, transcription by Alex Woelffer) -1- Original Text Modern Text Act 1, Scene 1 Enter RODMERIGO and IAGO RODERIGO and IAGO enter. RODERIGO RODERIGO Tush! Never tell me. I take it much unkindly Come on, don’t tell me that. I don’t like it that you That thou, Iago, who hast had my purse knew about this, Iago. All this time I’ve thought As if the strings were thine, shouldst know of this. you were such a good friend that I’ve let you spend my money as if it was yours. IAGO IAGO 'Sblood, but you’ll not hear me! If ever I did dream of Damn it, you’re not listening to me! I never such a matter, abhor me. dreamed this was happening—if you find out I did, you can go ahead and hate me. RODERIGO RODERIGO Thou told’st me You told me you hated him. Thou didst hold him in thy hate. IAGO IAGO Despise me I do hate him, I swear. Three of Venice’s most If I do not. Three great ones of the city important noblemen took their hats off to him and 10 (In personal suit to make me his lieutenant) asked him humbly to make me his lieutenant, the Off-capped to him, and by the faith of man second in command. And I know my own worth I know my price, I am worth no worse a place. well enough to know I deserve that position. But But he (as loving his own pride and purposes) he wants to have things his own way, so he Evades them with a bombast circumstance sidesteps the issue with a lot of military talk and 15 Horribly stuffed with epithets of war, refuses their request.
    [Show full text]
  • Chaucer's Troilus and Shakespeare's Troilus
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Eastern Illinois University Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 1989 Chaucer's Troilus and Shakespeare's Troilus: A Comparison of Their eclinesD Laura Devon Flesor Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in English at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Flesor, Laura Devon, "Chaucer's Troilus and Shakespeare's Troilus: A Comparison of Their eD clines" (1989). Masters Theses. 2408. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/2408 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THESIS REPRODUCTION CERTIFICATE TO: Graduate Degree Candidates who have written formal theses. SUBJECT: Permission to reproduce theses. The University Library is receiving a number of requests from other institutions asking permission to reproduce dissertations for inclusion in their library holdings. Although no copyright laws are involved, we feel that professional courtesy demands that permission be obtained from the author before we allow theses to be copied. · Please sign one of the following statements: Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University has my permission to lend my thesis to a reputable college or university for the purpose of copying it for inclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Othello Background Information
    Othello Background Information The Source of Othello Shakespeare delighted in taking old stories, adding his own particular brand of genius, and creating something new and better. He based Othello on a story in a collection of tales, called Hecatonimithi, written in 1565 by Giraldi Cinthio, an Italian. A short synopsis of the original story gives some indication of how Shakespeare merely borrowed stories and made them his own. • The heroine, called Disdemona, falls in love with a Moor. Her family agrees reluctantly to her marriage with him, and the couple lives together in Venice for awhile. • The Moor (given no name) is sent to command the troops in Cyprus. The Moor and Disdemona travel there together, and it's in Cyprus that the ensign (Shakespeare's lago) plots against them. • The ensign is in love with Disdemona. He feels that her rejection of him comes from her love of the captain (Shakespeare's Cassio). Therefore, the ensign's plot is against Disdemona, not the Moor. • The captain loses his job when he attempts a fight with another soldier; he isn't drunk, and the character of Roderigo has no counterpart. • The ensign steals Disdemona's handkerchief (while she is holding his child) and places it in the captain's house. The captain finds it and tries to return it to Desdemona, but he leaves quickly when he hears the Moor's voice. • Together, the Moor and the ensign kill Disdemona by hitting her on the head with a sandbag, and then making the roof collapse to make it look like an accident, The Moor is eventually killed by a relative of Disdemona, and the ensign is tortured to death for another crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Illusion in Troilus and Cressida
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 4-16-2010 Illusion in Troilus and Cressida Edward Janz University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Janz, Edward, "Illusion in Troilus and Cressida" (2010). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/1667 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Illusion in Troilus and Cressida by Edward Janz A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of English College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Hunt Hawkins, Ph.D. Elaine Smith, Ph.D. Joyce Karpay, Ph.D. Date of Approval: April 16, 2010 Keywords: Shakespeare, drama, satire, love, war © Copyright 2010, Edward Janz Table of Contents Abstract ii Introduction 1 Helen and the Value of War 5 Ulysses and the Value of Identity 17 Couples and the Value of Love 33 Conclusion 52 Works Cited 54 i Illusion in Troilus and Cressida Edward Janz ABSTRACT This thesis is an examination of Shakespeare’s 1603 satire Troilus and Cressida that looks at illusion and the value given to it by means of war, Helen of Troy, and ultimately the two lovers themselves. Although it is depressingly obvious throughout the drama that life is an illusion, it is also obvious that there is a need for that illusion, and an equally profound necessity to have the illusion debunked.
    [Show full text]
  • Food and Disillusion in Troilus and Cressida
    東洋大学人間科学総合研究所紀要 第20号(2018)57‐7357 Fair Fruit in an Unwholesome Dish; Food and Disillusion in Troilus and Cressida Michael RANDOLPH* Every play, certainly every Shakespeare play can be imagined to have a vicarious smell about it. After one reads through the texts or sees a successful and well-performed production, one can get a sense of how that plays subconsciously smells. Elsinore smells like a musty old castle, Arden smells like a forest in springtime, the Comedy of Errors smells like a spice merchant bazar, and while the Tempest is wrapped in the deep salty smell of the sea, Troilus and Cressida smells like a rotting, festering garbage dump. In this unique play, long in- grained cultural ideals of honor ; love, nobility, heroism, and gender are decaying and dissolving before our eyes. The deep, often-violent changes that came with the long death of the old Queen and the arrival of an out- sider, an openly misogynistic King who turned a long and very stable social structure into a very different soci- ety where honor and nobility were gradually being seen as only useful for political or monetary gain. The Essex rebellion in 1601 and the blossoming financial, social, and sexual equality of women in the society showed the English that whatever they had held dear was now dispersing into a new order. Finally London at the time was also sexually very promiscuous, at least for the upper classes. (1) It is important to note that London of the late Elizabethan and early Jacobean period was also rampant with diseases like plague, smallpox, syphilis, typhus, and malaria all caused by close proximity to other people, including intimacy putting relations between men and women, particularly sexual relations under public scrutiny.
    [Show full text]
  • 111320-21 Bk Otelloeu 12/18/07 4:06 PM Page 8
    111320-21 bk OtelloEU 12/18/07 4:06 PM Page 8 recently seen this handkerchief in Cassio’s hand. 0 The Venetian ambassador, Lodovico, Desdemona, ADD £ Otello is roused to jealous fury and swears Emilia and the court enter. Lodovico hands Otello a Great Opera Performances vengeance. Iago kneels beside him and vows to assist message from the Doge. While reading it, Otello 8.111320-21 him. continues to mutter bitter asides at Desdemona. He has been recalled to Venice and Cassio appointed in his CD 2 place. While announcing that he will set sail the following morning, he flings Desdemona to the ground. 1 Opening announcement ! Desdemona sings of her misery, and in the ensuing VERDI 2 CDs 2 Spoken synopsis of Act III ensemble Iago promises Otello that he will kill Cassio. Otello dismisses the court and curses Desdemona. At Otello Act III: The great hall of the castle this point alone except for Iago, Otello succumbs to a fit of epilepsy. As Otello lies prostrate on the floor, Iago Ramón Vinay • Herva Nelli • Giuseppe Valdengo 3 There is an orchestral introduction. mocks the fallen Lion of Venice. 4 A Herald announces that the galley bringing the NBC Symphony Orchestra and Choruses Venetian ambassadors has been sighted. Otello @ Spoken synopsis of Act IV acknowledges this, but continues talking to Iago. Iago is Arturo Toscanini planning to lure Cassio into the hall and into talking Act IV: Desdemona’s chamber about Desdemona. Recorded in 1947 5 Desdemona enters and once more tries to persuade # Emilia helps Desdemona to prepare for bed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shakespeare Apocrypha and Canonical Expansion in the Marketplace
    The Shakespeare Apocrypha and Canonical Expansion in the Marketplace Peter Kirwan 1 n March 2010, Brean Hammond’s new edition of Lewis Theobald’s Double Falsehood was added to the ongoing third series of the Arden Shakespeare, prompting a barrage of criticism in the academic press I 1 and the popular media. Responses to the play, which may or may not con- tain the “ghost”2 of Shakespeare and Fletcher’s Cardenio, have dealt with two issues: the question of whether Double Falsehood is or is not a forgery;3 and if the latter, the question of how much of it is by Shakespeare. This second question as a criterion for canonical inclusion is my starting point for this paper, as scholars and critics have struggled to define clearly the boundar- ies of, and qualifications for, canonicity. James Naughtie, in a BBC radio interview with Hammond to mark the edition’s launch, suggested that a new attribution would only be of interest if he had “a big hand, not just was one of the people helping to throw something together for a Friday night.”4 Naughtie’s comment points us toward an important, unqualified aspect of the canonical problem—how big does a contribution by Shakespeare need to be to qualify as “Shakespeare”? The act of inclusion in an editedComplete Works popularly enacts the “canonization” of a work, fixing an attribution in print and commodifying it within a saleable context. To a very real extent, “Shakespeare” is defined as what can be sold as Shakespearean. Yet while canonization operates at its most fundamental as a selection/exclusion binary, collaboration compli- cates the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of Othello
    Synopsis of Othello n a Venice street at night, Iago tells Roderigo that OOthello, the Moorish general of the Venetian army, has eloped with Roderigo’s beloved Desdemona, daughter of Brabantio. Iago reassures Roderigo that he hates Othello because he made Michael Cassio his lieutenant while Iago remains the general’s ensign, a position of lower rank. Iago and Roderigo wake Brabantio and tell him of Desdemona’s flight. Brabantio storms off with officers to apprehend Othello. Brabantio arrives at Othello’s lodging at the same time as messengers who request the general’s presence before the Duke on state matters. The enraged Brabantio demands justice against Othello, and they depart to have audience with the Duke. Orson Welles as Othello and Suzanne Cloutier as The Duke and members of the Senate discuss news that Desdemona in a film version of Othello (1952). the Turks have launched a fleet to attack Venetian• controlled Cyprus. Brabantio accuses Othello of using witchcraft to ensnare his daughter. Othello describes Desdemona is unable to produce the handkerchief when their courtship; Desdemona is sent for and confirms that the angry Othello demands to see it. Later, Cassio meets she freely gave her heart to Othello. Brabantio,Bianca, his courtesan lover, and asks her to copy the saddened, accepts her decision. The Duke sends Othello embroidery of a handkerchief he found in his room. Iago to defend Cyprus, and Desdemona asks to accompany tells Othello that Cassio has confessed to infidelity with Othello on his campaign. Othello entrusts her care to Desdemona. Othello, overcome with passion, falls into a Iago and his wife, Emilia.
    [Show full text]