Download Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Thesis This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Commanders in Control Disarmament Demobilisation and Reintegration in Afghanistan under the Karzai administration Derksen, Linde Dorien Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 27. Sep. 2021 Commanders in Control Disarmament Demobilisation and Reintegration in Afghanistan under the Karzai administration ABSTRACT Commanders in Control examines the four internationally-funded disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR) programmes in Afghanistan between 2003 and 2014. It argues that although on paper they were part of Western powers’ ambitious state building project, in reality they served the U.S.-led military campaign against the Taliban as one of the mechanisms through which foreign support to armed groups was either given or withheld. By targeting different groups in different ways and at different times, DDR programmes were shaped by the wider political context – namely the fight against the Taliban and the movement’s continued political exclusion. By examining the programmes’ impact on individual commanders in four provinces – two in the northeast and two in the southwest – this study shows that the programmes deepened this pattern of exclusion. Local allies of international troops used them to reinforce their own position and target rivals. Those targeted often sought alternative ways of remaining armed, including by joining the insurgency. Thus, DDR – which was largely used to strengthen those winning and demobilise those losing – promoted not peace, as some foreign donors expected, but war. The main lesson from the Afghan experience is that DDR amidst war can generate instability and violence. This is especially the case when significant armed groups are excluded and portrayed as irreconcilable even when representing communities’ genuine grievances – the case in Afghanistan and other countries on the sharp end of the War on Terror like Iraq and Somalia. The state in these places is too weak to permanently exclude large groups, even with international military support. This means that to gain more control over the use of force – which is usually the objective of DDR – it must find a way to accommodate, not exclude, the main militarised patronage networks. In Afghanistan this means including the Taliban. © Linde Dorien Derksen 2017 1 Doctoral Thesis War Studies Department, King’s College London September 2016 Linde Dorien (Deedee) Derksen KCL Candidate Number: 0946805 Supervisors: Prof Anatol Lieven; Prof Theo Farrell © Linde Dorien Derksen 2017 2 © Linde Dorien Derksen 2017 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this thesis may be made without permission of the author. No portion of this thesis may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with the author’s permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6-10 Kirby Street, London, EC1N 8TS. Any person or organisation who does any unauthorised act in relation to this thesis may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted her right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. © Linde Dorien Derksen 2017 3 In memory of Haji Habibullah © Linde Dorien Derksen 2017 4 Table of Contents Acknowledgment ................................................................................................................. 7 Chapter 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 8 1.1. State building: proponents and critics ....................................................................... 12 1.1.1. History of state building and DDR concepts ..................................................................... 14 1.1.2. Critics of state building ............................................................................................................. 18 1.1.3. State building as a framework of analysis .......................................................................... 27 1.2. Reconceptualising the international intervention part 1 ........................................... 29 1.2.1. Historically weak state .............................................................................................................. 29 1.2.2. Long history of reintegrating former combatants ............................................................ 42 1.2.3. Military campaign against the Taliban and their political exclusion ....................... 46 1.3. Reconceptualising the international intervention part 2 ........................................... 51 1.3.1. Points of departure ..................................................................................................................... 51 1.3.2. State builders or spoilers? A hypothesis ............................................................................. 53 1.4. Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 57 1.4.1. Sources, structure and focus ................................................................................................... 57 1.4.2. Researching in Afghanistan ..................................................................................................... 59 Chapter 2 Demobilising Friends: DDR and DIAG ................................................... 67 2.1. Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration (DDR) .......................................... 67 2.2. Disbanding Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) ................................................................... 89 Chapter 3 Demobilising Enemies: PTS and APRP ................................................. 104 3.1. Programme Tahkim Sulh (PTS) ................................................................................... 104 3.2. Afghanistan Peace and Reintegration Programme (APRP) .................................. 120 Chapter 4 DDR in the Northeast: Kunduz and Baghlan ....................................... 140 4.1. Background to post-2001 conflict dynamics .............................................................. 140 4.1.1. Pre-2001 ..................................................................................................................................... 140 4.1.2. Post-2001 .................................................................................................................................... 144 4.2. Kunduz Province ............................................................................................................. 147 4.2.1. DDR and DIAG – the case of Mir Alam ......................................................................... 147 4.2.2. The APRP ................................................................................................................................... 159 4.3. Baghlan Province ............................................................................................................. 163 4.3.1. DDR and DIAG – the case of Amir Gul ........................................................................... 163 4.3.2. The APRP ................................................................................................................................... 170 4.4. DDR deepens political exclusion in the northeast .................................................... 177 Chapter 5 DDR in the Southwest: Uruzgan and Helmand ................................... 180 5.1. Background to post-2001 conflict dynamics .............................................................. 180 5.1.1. Pre-2001 ..................................................................................................................................... 180 5.1.2. Post-2001 .................................................................................................................................... 183 5.2. Uruzgan Province ............................................................................................................ 185 5.2.1. DDR – the case of Jan Mohammad and Matiullah ...................................................... 185
Recommended publications
  • Fråga-Svar Afghanistan. Resväg Mellan Kabul Och Ghazni
    2015-09-03 Fråga-svar Afghanistan. Resväg mellan Kabul och Ghazni Fråga - Går det flyg mellan Kabul och Ghazni? - Är resvägen mellan Kabul och Ghazni säker för hazarer? - Finns det några organisationer i landet som kan bistå andra med t.ex. eskort för att göra resan säker? - Hur kan underåriga ta sig fram? Svar Nedan följer en sammanställning av information från olika källor. Sammanställningen gör inte anspråk på att vara uttömmande. Refererade dokument bör alltid läsas i sitt sammanhang. Vad gäller säkra resvägar så kan läget snabbt förändras. Vad som gällde då nedanstående dokument skrevs gäller kanske inte idag! Austalia Refugee Review Tribunal (May 2015): Domen handlar om en hazar från Ghazni som under lång tid levt som flykting i Iran. Underlaget till beslutet beskriver situationen angående resvägar i Afghanistan speciellt i provinsen Ghazni. Se utdrag nedan: 33. DFAT’s 2014 Report statcontains the following in relation to road security in Afghanistan: Insecurity compounds the poor condition of Afghanistan’s limited road network, particularly those roads that pass through areas contested by insurgents. Taliban and criminal elements target the national highway and secondary roads, setting up arbitrary armed checkpoints. Sida 1 av 8 Official ANP and ANA checkpoints designed to secure the road are sometimes operated by poorly-trained officers known to use violence to extort bribes. More broadly, criminals and insurgents on roads target all ethnic groups, sometimes including kidnapping for ransom. It is often difficult to separate criminality (such as extortion) from insurgent activity. Individuals working for, supporting or associated with the Government and the international community are at high risk of violence perpetrated by insurgents on roads in Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Uruzgan: 18 Months After the Dutch/Australian Leadership Handover
    April 2012 Uruzgan: 18 months after the Dutch/Australian Leadership Handover Goat Herder in Tirin Kot Bazaar / Picture: Casey Johnson TLO Annual Report Uruzgan: 18 months after the Dutch/Australian Leadership Handover A TLO Provincial Profile April 2012 © 2012, The Liaison Office. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the publisher, The Liaison Office. Permission can be obtained by emailing [email protected] 2010/11 Uruzgan 18 Months Assessment Acknowledgements This report is financed by the Royal Netherlands’s Embassy in Afghanistan and the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID). TLO reports are independent surveys and analyses of local perceptions and attitudes. While TLO makes all efforts to review and verify field data prior to publication, some factual inaccuracies may still remain. Data collection for this report was completed by 31 December 2011 and information presented may have changed since that time. TLO is solely responsible for possible inaccuracies in the information presented. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of AusAID, the Australian Government, or the Government of the Netherlands. The report authors would like to thank all individuals who spent time with the research team to contribute to this report as well as TLO colleagues whose comments and contributions helped to improve the clarity of the report and the correctness of its facts. About The Liaison Office (TLO) The Liaison Office (TLO) is an independent Afghan non-governmental organization seeking to improve local governance, stability and security through systematic and institutionalized engagement with customary structures, local communities, and civil society groups.
    [Show full text]
  • A Day-To-Day Chronicle of Afghanistan's Guerrilla and Civil
    A Day-to-Day Chronicle of Afghanistan's Guerrilla © and Civil War, June 2003 – Present Memories of Vietnam? A Chinook helicopter extracts troops of the 10th Vietnam epiphany. U.S. troops on patrol in the Afghan countryside, April 2003 Mountain Division in Nov. 2003 in Kunar province (photo by Sgt. Greg Heath, [photo in World News Network 5/2/03]. For more on parallels with Vietnam, see 4th Public Affairs Dept., Nov. 2003). Ian Mather, "Soldiers Fear 'Afghan Vietnam'," The Scotsman [May 4, 2003] A new file was begun after May 31, 2003 for two reasons: (1). during May, Secretary Rumsfeld announced the end of major U.S. combat operations in Afghanistan; and (2) in June, Mullah Omar announced a new 10-man leadership council of the Taliban and urged an increased guerrilla warfare. The new data set better captures the extent of this civil and guerrilla conflict. "...we're at a point where we clearly have moved from major combat activity to a period of stability and stabilization and reconstruction activities...." Spoken by Secretary Rumsfeld in Kabul on May 1, 2003 True or False? On August 22, 2002, the U.S. 82nd Airborne carried out another helicopter assault in Paktia province as part of a week-long campaign, 'Operation Mountain Sweep.' 1 Copyright © 2004 Marc W. Herold Estimated Number of Afghan Civilian "Impact Deaths1” Period Low Count High Count Oct. 2001 - May 2003 * 3,073 3,597 June 2003 – June 2004 412 437 CIVILIAN CASUALTIES TOTAL 3,485 4,034 * Source: “The Daily Casualty Count of Afghan Civilians Killed by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Winning Hearts and Minds in Uruzgan Province by Paul Fishstein ©2012 Feinstein International Center
    AUGUST 2012 Strengthening the humanity and dignity of people in crisis through knowledge and practice BRIEFING NOTE: Winning Hearts and Minds in Uruzgan Province by Paul Fishstein ©2012 Feinstein International Center. All Rights Reserved. Fair use of this copyrighted material includes its use for non-commercial educational purposes, such as teaching, scholarship, research, criticism, commentary, and news reporting. Unless otherwise noted, those who wish to reproduce text and image fi les from this publication for such uses may do so without the Feinstein International Center’s express permission. However, all commercial use of this material and/or reproduction that alters its meaning or intent, without the express permission of the Feinstein International Center, is prohibited. Feinstein International Center Tufts University 114 Curtis Street Somerville, MA 02144 USA tel: +1 617.627.3423 fax: +1 617.627.3428 fi c.tufts.edu 2 Feinstein International Center Contents I. Summary . 4 II. Study Background . 5 III. Uruzgan Province . 6 A. Geography . 6 B. Short political history of Uruzgan Province . 6 C. The international aid, military, and diplomatic presence in Uruzgan . 7 IV. Findings . .10 A. Confl uence of governance and ethnic factors . .10 B. International military forces . .11 C. Poor distribution and corruption in aid projects . .12 D. Poverty and unemployment . .13 E. Destabilizing effects of aid projects . 14 F. Winning hearts and minds? . .15 V. Final Thoughts and Looking Ahead . .17 Winning Hearts and Minds in Uruzgan Province 3 I. SUMMARY esearch in Uruzgan suggests that insecurity is largely the result of the failure Rof governance, which has exacerbated traditional tribal rivalries.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S
    Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy (name redacted) Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs (name redacted) Analyst in Middle Eastern Affairs November 7, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL30588 Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy Summary The United States, partner countries, and the Afghan government are attempting to reverse recent gains made by the resilient Taliban-led insurgency since the December 2014 transition to a smaller international mission consisting primarily of training and advising the Afghanistan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF). The Afghan government has come under increasing domestic criticism not only for failing to prevent insurgent gains but also for its internal divisions that have spurred the establishment of new political opposition coalitions. In September 2014, the United States brokered a compromise to address a dispute over the 2014 presidential election, but a September 2016 deadline was not met for enacting election reforms and deciding whether to elevate the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) position to a prime ministership. The Afghan government has made some measurable progress in reducing corruption and implementing its budgetary and other commitments. It has adopted measures that would enable it to proceed with new parliamentary elections, but no election date has been set. The number of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, which peaked at about 100,000 in 2011, is about 9,800, of which most are assigned to the 13,000-person NATO-led “Resolute Support Mission” (RSM) that trains, assists, and advises the ANDSF. About 2,000 of the U.S. contingent are involved in combat against Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups, including the Afghanistan branch of the Islamic State organization (ISIL-Khorasan), under “Operation Freedom’s Sentinel” (OFS).
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Golden Gate to Connect Sangin, Musa Qal'ah Tanks Disrupt
    NEWS Operation Golden Gate to connect Sangin, Musa Qal'ah Story and photos by Cpl. Anthony Ward Jr. SANGIN DISTRICT, Afghanistan – Ground was broken for the start of Operation Golden Gate in the Sangin District of Helmand province, Afghanistan, Nov. 4. Marines, sailors and soldiers are working together in an effort to build a bridge more than 24 feet wide that will span more than 150 feet across the Helmand River, allowing for easy passage for the local people. “This is a joint project to build a permanent bridging solution to connect the east and west banks of the river, “said 2nd Lt. Benjamin Nelson, mission commander for Engineer Company, Combat Logistics Battalion 2, Combat Logistics Regiment 15. The current bridge site is near the northern causeway, which once housed a bridge that connected the people of Sangin and Musa Qal’ah. “The northern causeway was the site of an existing medium girder bridge,” said Lt. j.g. James A. Bruno, platoon commander with Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 133. “Over time, the river expanded west, making it no longer feasible to have the bridge there.” (Read the STORY) Tanks disrupt enemy activity in known insurgent hotbed Story and photos by Cpl. Mark Garcia COMBAT OUTPOST SHIR GHAZAY, Afghanistan – During a time when insurgents typically bed down for the winter, Marines and coalition forces engaged multiple enemy forces during Operation Helmand Viper, Oct. 19 through 27. Tanks with Bravo Company, 2nd Tank Battalion, Regimental Combat Team 7, led the support mission for special operations forces. The operation’s focus was to find and destroy weapons caches, improvised explosive devices and drug producing facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Disarmament and Rearmament in Afghanistan
    [PEACEW RKS [ THE POLITICS OF DISARMAMENT AND REARMAMENT IN AFGHANISTAN Deedee Derksen ABOUT THE REPORT This report examines why internationally funded programs to disarm, demobilize, and reintegrate militias since 2001 have not made Afghanistan more secure and why its society has instead become more militarized. Supported by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) as part of its broader program of study on the intersection of political, economic, and conflict dynamics in Afghanistan, the report is based on some 250 interviews with Afghan and Western officials, tribal leaders, villagers, Afghan National Security Force and militia commanders, and insurgent commanders and fighters, conducted primarily between 2011 and 2014. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Deedee Derksen has conducted research into Afghan militias since 2006. A former correspondent for the Dutch newspaper de Volkskrant, she has since 2011 pursued a PhD on the politics of disarmament and rearmament of militias at the War Studies Department of King’s College London. She is grateful to Patricia Gossman, Anatol Lieven, Mike Martin, Joanna Nathan, Scott Smith, and several anonymous reviewers for their comments and to everyone who agreed to be interviewed or helped in other ways. Cover photo: Former Taliban fighters line up to handover their rifles to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan during a reintegration ceremony at the pro- vincial governor’s compound. (U.S. Navy photo by Lt. j. g. Joe Painter/RELEASED). Defense video and imagery dis- tribution system. The views expressed in this report are those of the author alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Institute of Peace.
    [Show full text]
  • People of Ghazni
    Program for Culture & Conflict Studies [email protected] Updated: June 1, 2010 Province: Baghlan Governor: Munshi Abdul Majid Deputy Governor: Sheikh Baulat (Deceased as a result of February 2008 auto accident) Provincial Police Chief: Abdul Rahman Sayedkhali PRT Leadership: Hungary Population Estimate: 1 Urban: 146,000 Rural: 616,500 Area in Square Kilometers: 21,112 sq. km Capital: Puli Khumri Names of Districts: Kahmard, Tala Wa Barfak, Khinjan, Dushi, Dahana-i-Ghori, Puli Khumri, Andarab, Nahrin, Baghlan, Baghlani Jadid, Burka, Khost Wa Firing Composition of Ethnic Groups: Religious Tribal Groups: Population:2 Tajik: 52% Groups: Gilzhai Pashtun 20% Pashtun: 20% Sunni 85% Hazara: 15% Shi'a 15% Uzbek: 12% Tatar: 1% Income Generation Major: Minor: Agriculture Factory Work Animal Husbandry Private Business (Throughout Province) Manual Labor (In Pul-i-Khomri District) Crops/Farming/Livestock: Agriculture: Livestock: Major: Wheat, Rice Dairy and Beef Cows Secondary: Cotton, Potato, Fodder Sheep (wool production) Tertiary: Consumer Vegetables Poultry (in high elevation Household: Farm Forestry, Fruits areas) Literacy Rate Total:3 20% Number of Educational Schools: Colleges/Universities: 2 Institutions:4 Total: 330 Baghlan University-Departments of Primary: 70 Physics, Social Science and Literature Lower Secondary: 161 in Pul-e-Khumri. Departments of Higher Secondary: 77 Agriculture and Industry in Baghlan Islamic: 19 Teacher Training Center-located in Tech/Vocational: 2 Pul-e-Khumri University: 1 Number of Security January: 3 May: 0 September: 1 Incidents, 2007: 8 February: 0 June: 0 October: 0 March: 0 July: 0 November: 2 April: 2 August: 0 December: 0 Poppy (Opium) Cultivation:5 2006: 2,742 ha 2007: 671 ha NGOs Active in Province: UNHCR, FAO, WHO, IOM, UNOPS, UNICEF, ANBP, ACTED, AKF/AFDN, CONCERN, HALO TRUST, ICARDA, SCA, 1 Central Statistics Office Afghanistan, 2005-2006 Population Statistics, available from http://www.cso- af.net/cso/index.php?page=1&language=en (accessed May 7, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN Weekly Humanitarian Update (2 – 8 November 2020)
    AFGHANISTAN Weekly Humanitarian Update (2 – 8 November 2020) KEY FIGURES IDPs IN 2020 (AS OF 8 NOVEMBER) 278,420 People displaced by conflict 157,630 Received assistance NATURAL DISASTERS IN 2020 (AS OF 8 NOVEMBER) 110,560 Number of people affected by natural disasters UNDOCUMENTED RETURNEES Conflict incident IN 2020 (AS OF 7 NOVEMBER) Internal displacement 720,000 Returnees from Iran Disruption of services 6,630 Returnees from Pakistan 3,200 Returnees from other countries South: Humanitarian activities affected by fighting HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE Armed clashes between Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) and a non-state PLAN (HRP) REQUIREMENTS & armed group (NSAG) continued with airstrikes and Improvised Explosive Device FUNDING (IED) detonations mainly in Kandahar, Hilmand, Zabul and Uruzgan provinces. The ongoing conflict has resulted in displacement and civilian casualties and is 1.13B hindering the delivery of humanitarian assistance and services, particularly in Requirements (US$) – HRP hard-to-reach districts. 2020 In Hilmand, movement in affected areas is restricted due the presence of IEDs. 474.6M On 2 November, a roadside IED in Bolan, Lashkargah reportedly killed seven 42% funded (US$) in 2020 people and wounded two others. The main roads connecting Kandahar city to AFGHANISTAN HUMANITARIAN Panjwayi and Zheray are only partially open due to damaged culverts and the FUND (AHF) 2020 threat of IEDs. The presence of IEDs has also been reported on farms in Arghandab district. Three health facilities in Hilmand remain closed while nine 57.01M others are partially open. Five Mobile Health Teams suspended their services in Contributions (US$) Maywand and Zheray districts affecting 20,000 people in hard-to-reach areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Avertissement Liens
    AVERTISSEMENT Ce document est le fruit d’un long travail approuvé par le jury de soutenance et mis à disposition de l’ensemble de la communauté universitaire élargie. Il est soumis à la propriété intellectuelle de l’auteur : ceci implique une obligation de citation et de référencement lors de l’utilisation de ce document. D’autre part, toute contrefaçon, plagiat, reproduction illicite de ce travail expose à des poursuites pénales. Contact : [email protected] LIENS Code la Propriété Intellectuelle – Articles L. 122-4 et L. 335-1 à L. 335-10 Loi n°92-597 du 1er juillet 1992, publiée au Journal Officiel du 2 juillet 1992 http://www.cfcopies.com/V2/leg/leg-droi.php http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/infos-pratiques/droits/protection.htm ����� ������������������������� ������������������������������������� ������������� Université Toulouse 1 Capitole (UT1 Capitole) ��������������������������� M. Haroon MANNANI le 11 juillet 2014 ������� � La reconstruction de l'État-Nation en Afghanistan �������������� et �discipline ou spécialité � � ED SJP : Sciences Politiques �������������������� Centre Toulousain d'Histoire du Droit et des Idées Politiques (CTHDIP) ���������������������������� Mme DANIELLE CABANIS, professeur des universités Université Toulouse 1 Jury: M. FARKHAD ALIMUKHAMEDOV, professeur Université d'Ankara - Rapporteur du jury M. FRANÇOIS-PAUL BLANC, professeur émérite Université de Perpignan - Rapporteur du jury Mme DANIELLE CABANIS, professeur des universités Université Toulouse 1 - Directeur de recherches M. JEAN-MARIE
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Monthly Idp Update
    AFGHANISTAN MONTHLY IDP UPDATE 01 – 30 November 2014 KEY FIGURES HIGHLIGHTS --- -------------------- ---------------- - . Region end-Oct 2014 Increase Decrease end-Nov 2014 15,617 individuals, displaced by conflict, were profiled South 207,160 3,050 - 210,210 during November 2014, of West 193,439 4,286 - 197,725 whom: East 134,640 1,030 - 135,670 10,138 individuals were North 100,897 1,785 - 102,682 displaced in November; 2,674 in October; 649 in September; Central 112,081 5,432 - 117,513 1,002 in August; 60 in July; 31 Southeast 18,328 - - 18,328 in June; and 1,063 earlier. Central Highlands - 34 - 34 . The total number of profiled Total 766,545 15,617 - 782,162 IDPs as of end November 2014 is 782,162 individuals. The major causes of displacement were the military operations and armed conflict between Anti Governmental Elements (AGEs) and Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF)/Afghan local police. Other causes included harassments by AGEs. Disaggregated data for November profiled: 49 % male The primary needs profiled was food and NFIs, followed by shelter and cash grants. and 51% female; The majority of the profiled IDPs in November were assisted with food and NFIs, 48% adults and 52% children. through the IDP Task Force agencies including DoRR, DRC, NRC, UNHCR, WFP, APA, ODCG, ACF, etc. PARTNERSHIPS Lack of access to verify displacement and respond to immediate needs of IDPs continues to be a significant challenge for IDP Task Force agencies. The National IDP Task Force is The UNHCR led verification of Kabul informal settlements which was planned for chaired by the Ministry of November is completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Report- Book Launch 88 Days to Kandahar a CIA Diary
    INSTITUTE OF web: www.issi.org.pk phone: +92-920-4423, 24 STRATEGIC STUDIES |fax: +92-920-4658 Report- Book Launch 88 Days to Kandahar A CIA Diary March 11, 2016 Compiled by: Amina Khan Edited by: Najam Rafique Pictures of the Event 1|P a g e Report-BL 88 Days to Kandahar: A CIA Diary March 11, 2016 P a g e | 2 Report-BL 88 Days to Kandahar: A CIA Diary March 11, 2016 P a g e | 3 Report-BL 88 Days to Kandahar: A CIA Diary March 11, 2016 Report 88 Days to Kandahar: A CIA Diary The Institute of Strategic Studies, Islamabad (ISSI), organised a public talk and launch of the book “88 Days to Kandahar: A CIA Diary” by Robert L. Grenier on March 11, 2016. The guest speaker was Mr. Robert Grenier, former CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) station chief in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Other speakers included; Ambassador Mohammad Sadiq, Secretary National Assembly Division, PM Secretariat; Lt. Gen. Javed Alam (Retd.), and Mr. Zahid Hussain, senior journalist. In his welcome remarks, Ambassador Masood Khan, Director General, ISSI, highlighted the various issues and challenges Pakistan was confronted with. Speaking about Afghanistan, he said that initially Islamabad was reluctant to get involved in the Afghan peace process. This was primarily because it did not want to instigate an Afghan civil war. However, the Pakistani government was persuaded to play a more instrumental role by the Afghan leadership – both present and their predecessors. He opined that Pakistan has always remained very steadfast and very committed to the peace process in Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]