UNITED STATES LIFESAVING ASSOCIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING

Hilton Long Beach 701 W Ocean Blvd. Long Beach, California 90831 April 25-28, 2018

Page 1 of 15

Thursday, April 26, 2018 – Board of Directors & Committee Meetings

*Business attire is required for all Delegates to the initial day of the USLA Board of Directors meeting until all committee meetings have concluded and through the conclusion of the Educational Conference and luncheon (per USLA policy) 9:00 a.m. Board of Directors Meeting I. Call to Order (Mr. Davis) A. Pledge of Allegiance (Mr. Beuerlein) B. Welcome and Introductions (Mr. Davis) Mr. Davis thanked Mr. Beuerlein and the rest of the Southwest Region for organizing the meeting. Mr. Beuerlein introduced Mr. Pat West, the Long Beach City Manager and recurrent Huntington Beach Lifeguard. Mr. West welcomed the group and talked about his time as a Huntington Beach Lifeguard in the 1970’s and how it shaped his career. He stated how important ocean lifeguarding is as a profession. C. Moment of Silence for the Departed – Mr. Davis asked the delegation for a moment of silence and the following were mentioned: Blaine “Sumo” Sato, Huntington Beach and Newport Beach Lifeguard Chaplain; Scott Holland, City of Fort Lauderdale; Kevin McAvoy, Town of Hempstead. D. Opening Ceremony (Mr. Gavin and Mr. Goto) – Each region was asked to provide sand from their region for a mixing of the sands ceremony to represent unity for the organization. Mr. Kalani Vierra also spoke about the word “pono” which means righteousness and stated that many native Hawaiians use this term to eliminate conflict and urged attendees to use this attitude during the meeting. II. Roll Call of Delegates (Ms. Bowie) DELEGATE VOTES BASED ON MEMBERSHIP (AS OF APRIL 2, 2018) Member/Director Ratio 2- 25 1 Director 26-100 2 Directors 101-200 3 Directors 201-400 4 Directors 401-600 5 Directors 601-800 6 Directors 801-and over 7 Directors MEMBERS VOTES PRESENT PROXY TOTAL JUNIORS GREAT LAKES 40 2 1 1 2 0 JERRY GAVIN GULF COAST JIM PIGG 169 3 2 1 3 115 TONY PRYOR MID-ATLANTIC ED KIZIUEWICZ ED ZEBROWSKI BUZZ MOGCK 1139 7 7 0 7 1411 CHARLIE HARTL DENISE BLAIR DAVE FOXWELL ED ZEBROWSKI III NEW ENGLAND BOB BERTRAND 37 2 2 0 2 9 W. JAMES FARRELL NORTHWEST KYLE MAXWELL 1 JIM MCCRAY DAVID ROBINSON 101 3 3 0 3 PACIFIC ISLANDS RALPH GOTO KALANI VIERRA 76 2 2 0 2 17

SOUTH ATLANTIC MUNRO REED MIKE WAGNER TOM GILL 334 CHAD MOTZ DUKE BROWN 829 7 7 0 7 ADRIENNE GROH RALPH WAGNER SOUTHEAST JO WAGENHALS GERRY FALCONER ALAN HOLT 847 7 6 1 7 548 JIM MCCRADY CHRIS NOWVISKI SCOTT HANSSON SOUTHWEST MARK ALLEN BILL HUMPHREYS MICHAEL BEUERLEIN GUD AVILA MIKE SILVESTRI 1312 7 7 0 7 2757 CASEY GRAHAM JAY BUTKI

SUB TOTALS 4550 40 37 3 40 5192 NATIONAL (AT LARGE) 8 0 0 0 0 9 TOTALS 4558 5201

Page 2 of 15

Additional Attendees: Gulf Coast – Art Hurtado Mid-Atlantic –Andy Healey, Tim Harmon Pacific Islands – Kevin Ryan South Atlantic – Robert Edgerton Southwest – Alphonso Pepito, Charlotte Graham, Chris Linkletter, Leslie Schwene. Bill Richarsdon, Bob Moore, Jim Hughes, Steve Himes, Jose Abasolo, Greg Williams, Micah Carlson, Brian Murphy, Coral Berry, Dan Murphy, Jim Turner, Bryan Etnyre, Jason Shook, Renae Jackson, Joseph Sholl Members of the Executive Board – Peter Davis, President; Nikki Bowie, Secretary; Michael Bradley, Treasurer; Ralph Goto, Advisor; B. Chris Brewster, Liaison; Peter Wernicki, Medical Advisor; Kay Smiley, Executive Director

III. Approval of Agenda – Motion to approve by Mr. Brewster. MPU IV. Approval of Minutes - from the USLA Board of Directors meeting in Vancouver, BC, October 20-21, 2017. Motion to approve by Mr. Foxwell. MPU V. Memorialization – of Executive Committee actions since the previous meeting. A. “Shall the Executive Committee accept these committee chair appointments presented by President Davis - Ed Zebrowski III for Lifesaving Sport and Mike Wagner for Bylaws?” Motion passed 9 in favor (President, Secretary, Treasurer, Liaison, Great Lakes, Gulf Coast, Mid-Atlantic, New England, South Atlantic) and 7 opposed (Vice President, Executive Delegate, Advisor, Northwest, Pacific Island, Southeast, Southwest). B. “Shall the Executive Committee recommend the following to the Board of Directors “Shall Policy and Procedure III-J, Business Meeting Decorum, C, be amended for the Spring 2018 meeting only to state “Business attire is to be worn by all Delegates to the initial day of the Board of Director’s meeting until all committee meetings have concluded and through the conclusion of the Educational Conference and luncheon.”?” If approved, this will be proposed to the Board of Directors on the first day of the USLA Spring 2018 Board of Directors meeting. Motion passed with Gulf Coast opposed. This was approved by the Board of Directors with the Gulf Coast opposing. C. “Shall the Executive Committee waive the Policy & Procedure III-C-B-1(b) requiring the hotel room rate to be $175.00 or less for the 2018 Fall Board of Director’s meeting and allow a $199.00 rate?” Motion failed with 8 opposed (Secretary, Treasurer, Liaison, Great Lakes, Gulf Coast, Mid-Atlantic, New England, South Atlantic), 7 in favor (Vice President, Executive Delegate, Advisor, Northwest, Pacific Island, Southeast, Southwest) and the President abstaining. D. “Shall the Executive Committee waive the Policy & Procedure III-C-B-1(b) requiring the hotel room rate to be $175.00 or less for the 2018 Fall Board of Director’s meeting and allow a $189.00 rate?” Motion passed with 8 in favor (Vice President, Executive Delegate, Advisor, Great Lakes, Northwest, Pacific Island, Southeast, Southwest), 7 opposed (Secretary, Treasurer, Liaison, Gulf Coast, Mid-Atlantic, New England, South Atlantic) and the President abstaining. E. “Based on the attached proposal, shall the USLA Executive Committee finalize a legal contract with P2P for a length of five years?” MPU VI. Officers Activity Reports - Verbal reports to be limited to approximately two minutes, highlighting the key points in written reports previously submitted & published. A. President (Mr. Peter Davis) Mr. Davis highlighted his written report. The collaboration continues with NOAA, Sea Grant and National Weather Service revising a lot of materials and new graphics and verbiage will be forth coming. This has been a labor intensive process, but will result in more concise and accessible information. Since November, Water Safety USA has met bi-monthly by conference call and is preparing to issue a new safety message for the coming year which addresses the importance of designating a “Water Watcher”. Mr. Davis formalized how he made committee chair appointments and this process is included in his written report. [2018_01_04_USLABOD_PresidentActivity.PDF] B. Vice President (Mr. Michael Beuerlein) Mr. Beuerlein welcomed everyone to Long Beach. He noted that Long Beach has a rich lifesaving tradition and Marine Safety Chief Gonzalo Medina has demonstrated that this meeting has the full support of the City, the Fire Department, the Marine Safety Division, the Long Beach Lifeguard Associations and the Port of Long Beach. Since he was elected Vice President he has participated in a number of Executive Committee actions, has conferred with the Executive Board at the request of the President, has been reviewing the monthly activities of the Executive Director and drafted a document of past Page 3 of 15

practice for committee chair appointments for future consideration as a policy or procedure. [2018_01_05_USLABOD_VicePresidentActivity.PDF] C. Secretary (Ms. Nikki Bowie) Ms. Bowie asked that her report stand as submitted. In addition, Ms. Bowie reminded committee chairs and officers to turn in activity and action reports as stated in the Policies and Procedures so that she can complete the agenda and meeting minutes in a timely manner. She also requested once the draft meeting minutes have been published that members take the time to review and contact the Secretary directly in case there are any questions. [2018_01_06_USLABOD_SecretaryActivity.PDF] D. Treasurer (Mr. Michael Bradley) Mr. Bradley reported that in the past several months he has wrapped up the 2017 fiscal year including the 2017 audit and tax filing. Notable items included Certification revenue being up over budget $6500 and Membership revenue being under budget by approximately $7000 mainly due to unpaid invoices. Royalties were up over $3700 due in large part to new textbook sales. [2018_01_07_USLABOD_TreasurerActivity.PDF] E. Executive Delegate (Mr. Kyle Maxwell) Mr. Maxwell reported that he stepped down as the Northwest Region President to better serve as the Executive Delegate. Cathy VonWald will serve the remainder of his term as region president. [2018_01_08_USLABOD_ExecutiveDelegateActivity.PDF] F. Advisor (Mr. Ralph Goto) Mr. Goto asked that his report stand as submitted, but wanted to highlight an issue that has been occurring in Hawaii. There have been fourteen fatal drownings to date in the islands and all fourteen were attributed to snorkeling. There is a taskforce that is investigating this phenomenon. [2018_01_09_USLABOD_AdvisorActivity.PDF] G. Liaison Officer (Mr. B. Chris Brewster) Mr. Brewster highlighted several items from his report beginning with an issue related to the National Drowning Registry. For years the US Healthcare System has relied on a set of codes originally called the ICD-9 codes, now called ICD-10. ICD stands for International Classification of Diseases and when there is an injury or death, they are coded for a number of reasons. Currently natural bodies of water are not broken down by location and this prevents easy reference for how many drowning incidents occurred in the ocean versus other bodies of water. Mr. Brewster submitted a proposal on behalf of the USLA recommending more specific breakdowns of accident locations in drowning accident data to the ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee. This proposal is included in an attachment to his written report. Mr. Rick Gould, Dr. Rob Brander and Mr. Brewster are coauthoring a paper that corrects some misinformation in the science literature about the percent of rescues attributed to rip currents. Water Safety USA is a group comprised of 14 national organizations and Mr. Brewster serves as moderator of the group. In addition to producing a safety theme each year, they are also developing a strategy to create a national water safety plan. At the Brewster, Massachusetts meeting in the spring of 2017, the Board of Directors adopted a position with respect to public rescue tubes. Since then, he has received some inquiries as to what the USLA’s position is on this topic. He requested that this be deferred to the Bylaws Committee as to if this should be placed in a policy. [2018_01_10_USLABOD_LiaisonActivity.PDF] H. Medical Advisor (Dr. Peter Wernicki) In addition to his written report, Dr. Wernicki noted that the Medical Committee has been asked to look at possibly having a sample or standard form for a physical for lifeguards. Agencies were asked to submit forms they may be using to Ms. Smiley so the committee can come up with a recommendation. [2018_01_11_USLABOD_MedicalAdvisorActivity.PDF] I. Legal Advisor (Mr. Chip More) Mr. More was unable to attend and his report will stand as submitted. [2018_01_12_USLABOD_LegalAdvisorActivity.PDF] VII. Regional Council Activity Reports A. Great Lakes (Mr. Jerry Gavin for Mr. Joe Pecoraro) Mr. Gavin asked that the report stand as submitted. [2018_01_25_USLABOD_GreatLakesActivity.PDF] B. Gulf Coast (Mr. Tony Pryor) Mr. Pryor asked that his report stand as submitted. Mr. Davis added that during Hurricane Harvey, lifeguards were making Jet Ski rescues off roof tops and other hard to reach areas and have been looking at longer or bigger sleds for these types of rescues. [2018_01_26_USLABOD_GulfCoastActivity.PDF] C. Mid-Atlantic (Mr. Ed Zebrowski) Mr. Zebrowski asked that his report stand as submitted. [2018_01_22_USLABOD_Mid-AtlanticActivity.PDF]

Page 4 of 15

D. New England (Mr. Jim Farrell) Mr. Farrell asked that his report stand as submitted. [2018_01_21_USLABOD_NewEnglandActivity.PDF] E. Northwest (Mr. Robinson for Ms. VonWald) Mr. Robinson asked that the report stand as submitted. In addition, Sonoma County had fires where over 6,000 homes were lost including several lifeguards. Thanks to those regions who have donated USLA shirts to replace lost items. [2018_01_27_USLABOD_NorthwestActivity.PDF] F. Pacific Islands (Mr. Kalani Vierra) Mr. Vierra requested that his report stand as submitted and provided updates on several items. North Shore towers on Kauai are closed due to road closures from floods and this is forcing visitors to two beaches on the South Shore. A new lifeguard tower was added at Poipu Beach Park creating more coverage with two towers at this increasingly popular location. There was a workshop led by Mr. Goto concerning snorkeling on Oahu including rental companies, resorts, manufactures and physicians due to snorkeling being the leading cause of death to visitors. Kauai will host the State Drowning Prevention Conference in August of 2018. [2018_01_29_USLABOD_PacificIslandsActivity.PDF] G. South Atlantic (Mr. Mike Wagner) Mr. Wagner reported that the region hosted their winter meeting in January in Hilton Head, SC. At this meeting, Tom Gill and Ralph Wagner, who had both served the South Atlantic Region for over 10 years, decided not to run for President and Vice President. Thanks to Tom and Ralph for their leadership. Elections were held with the following results: President, Mike Wagner; Vice President, Chad Motz; Secretary, Adrienne Groh; Treasurer, Monty Reed; Executive Delegate, Duke Brown and Tom Gill assumed the Advisor position as the past president. [2018_01_23_USLABOD_SouthAtlanticActivity.PDF] H. Southeast (Mr. Gerry Falconer) In addition to his written report Mr. Falconer offered his support for Mr. Goto’s and Mr. Vierra’s efforts in the Pacific Islands Region in regards to the snorkeling-related deaths. This seems to be an issue that wasn’t well know and Mr. Falconer, after talking to Mr. Goto, contacted the Monroe County Coroner to see if there were any correlations between snorkeling and drowning particularly in the Florida Keys. Currently this information isn’t available and this is the same in Miami-Dade County, so this is an interesting topic to be researched further. [2018_01_24_USLABOD_SoutheastActivity.PDF] I. Southwest (Mr. Bill Humphreys) Mr. Humphreys thanked Kay Smiley for her assistance with sponsors for the meeting. In January there were changes to the Southwest Region’s Executive Board; Kai Bond, Rob Williams and Rob McGowan all voluntarily stepped down from their positions with over 50 combined years of service to the USLA. The regional board meeting was held in early April with representatives from over 30 chapters attending. At the meeting there were 8 Medals of Valor, 4 Heroic Act awards and 1 Meritorious Act award presented on behalf of the USLA and the Southwest Region. Members of the region continue to be involved in the California Marie Safety chief’s Association and this shows that partnerships such as this are one way to further cooperation between the region and agencies. To further this coordination, the region has created an Agency Liaison position. Partnerships are ongoing with the John Wayne Cancer Foundation and Project Wipeout. Both organizations have been supportive of lifesaving and public educations. The region will host the first “train the trainer” PWC course which came out of the USLA Certification Committee. The California Marine Chief’s Association requested that the USLA consider an emergency vehicle training certification program similar to the PWC course as one of the next Certification Committee projects. [2018_01_28_USLABOD_SouthwestActivity.PDF] VIII. Executive Director (Ms. Kay Smiley) Ms. Smiley provided an update on her activities since the previous meeting in October. She feels like there has been a momentum building within the USLA. She shared positive feedback on the new manual and the instructor materials, new potential statistics program and course completion cards. [2018_01_15_USLABOD_ExecutiveDirectorActivity.PDF] IX. Fund Raising and Sponsorship Oversight (Mr. Ed Zebrowski) Mr. Zebrowski asked that his report stand as submitted. [2018_01_14_USLABOD_SponsorshipOversightActivity.PDF] X. Magazine Publication (Mr. Chris Brewster) Mr. Brewster commented that he has two obligations as the editor of the magazine. One is to put out a quality magazine on time and the other is ensuring that our costs are low and our revenues are high while ensuring that we are paid by our advertisers. He was recently able to dramatically reduce the cost of publication through competitive bidding – there is approximately a 65% reduction in the cost of producing ALM without any decline in quality or content and about the same number of advertisers. [2018_01_47_USLABOD_ALMActivity.PDF]

Page 5 of 15

XI. Public Information Officer (Mr. Tom Gill) Mr. Gill asked that his report stand as submitted. In addition, if anyone is asked to do an interview on beach and water safety, please try to represent and mention the USLA in a positive light. [2018_01_46_USLABOD_PIOActivity.PDF] XII. Statistician (Mr. Rick Gould) Mr. Gould reported that the statistics system we have had in place for over twenty years is no longer useful. Technology has gone far past this system. Mr. Gould and Ms. Smiley have been looking for an appropriate system that will do everything we need it to do, including real-time data. This is also the time to think about what we collect. We are currently collecting data that was developed primarily based on Southern California in 1964 and these categories were slightly expanded in the mid-eighties. There are categories that must be considered added to the system and some that may need to be modified or deleted. Mr. Beuerlein presented Mr. Gould with the Professional Achievement Award on behalf of the USLA for all his years as Statistician and his ongoing work to develop an enhanced statistics program. XIII. Committee Chair Activity Reports A. Standing Committees i. Bylaws (Mr. Mike Wagner) – Mr. Wagner reported that there was no activity since the previous meeting. ii. Certification (Mr. Chris Brewster) Mr. Brewster recognized Mr. Bill Richardson and thanked him for appointing Mr. Brewster to chair the first USLA certification program in 1992. It took a while to get the program going, but in 1994 the first three agencies were certified – Brevard County, Florida, San Diego, California and Long Beach, California. Currently there are 140 lifeguard agencies certified nationwide and 14 ARRT certified. One of the roles of the Certification Committee is to ensure that agencies are meeting the required standards. To effectively run the Certification Committee and conduct business between meetings, committee members need to be identified. [2018_01_37_USLABOD_CertificationActivity.PDF] iii. Heroic Acts- Recognition, Awards and Presentations (Ms. Adrienne Groh) Ms. Groh asked that her report stand as submitted and the following presentations were made: 1. Daniel Black – Heroic Act Award 2. Lance Demsey – Heroic Act Award 3. Matt Rhodes – Medal of Valor 4. City of San Clemente – Joe Pecoraro National Award for Distinguished Safety Service and the National Award for Drowning Prevention Achievement 5. Appreciation awards were given to all Committee Chairs and Officers. [2018_01_35_USLABOD_HeroicActsActivity.PDF] iv. Junior Guards (Mr. David Robinson) Mr. Robinson asked that his report stand as submitted. [2018_01_36_USLABOD_JuniorGuardActivity.PDF] v. Lifesaving Sport (Mr. Ed Zebrowski III) Mr. Zebrowski III asked that his report stand as submitted. [2018_01_34_USLABOD_LifesavingSportActivity.PDF] vi. Membership (Mr. Charlie Hartl) Mr. Hartl asked that his report stand as submitted but had a reminder that he took over as the Membership Chair on a temporary basis and is looking for someone to take over. If anyone is interested, please advise Mr. Davis. [2018_01_33_USLABOD_MembershipActivity.PDF] vii. Public Education (Ms. Denise Blair) Ms. Blair presented the National Beach Safety Challenge Award to the Southeast Region, Shore Beach Service, Cape May Beach Patrol and Jax Beach Ocean Rescue. Ms. Blair reported that proposed NJ Bill A5159 did not make it through the legislative process last year, but will be re-introduced. This bill seeks to require water safety to be taught in Physical Education and Health curriculum. Mr. Silvestri will present submissions for the Public Education Grant Program and the committee will vote on which grants to approve. [2018_01_32_USLABOD_PublicEducationActivity.PDF] viii. Ways and Means (Mr. Michael Bradley) Mr. Bradley welcomed the new treasurers for all regions and is looking forward to working with them in Ways and Means. There is one correction from his written report. The original report showed the 2017 National Lifeguard Competition losing money Page 6 of 15

when there was actually a surplus of just over $11,000. The Lifesaving Sport budget went into the negative. Mr. Bradley reported on the progress of investment of the USLA reserves and this information is included in his written report. [2018_01_38_USLABOD_WaysAndMeansActivity.PDF] B. Working Group Committees i. Heritage (Mr. Jerry Gavin) Mr. Gavin reported that the committee had already conducted their meeting. Thumb drives with interviews have been distributed for review. Information has been sent to the Public Education Committee for Water Safety USA. The committee is working on liability releases. [2018_01_54_USLABOD_HeritageActivity.PDF] ii. Information Technology – (Ms. Karissa Ickes) Ms. Ickes was unable to attend and her report will stand as submitted. [2018_01_48_USLABOD_InformationTechnology.PDF] iii. Medical (Dr. Peter Wernicki) – Dr. Wernicki had nothing in addition to his Medical Advisor report. C. Project Groups i. Fundraising (Mr. Jim McCray) Mr. McCray was unable to attend and his report will stand as submitted. [2018_01_62_USLABOD_FundraisingActivity.PDF] ii. Meeting/Educational Conference Planning (Mr. Michael Bradley) Mr. Bradley discussed the trial change in meeting structure for the fall 2018 meeting to be held in Delray Beach, Florida. Goals for the expanded education conference are to provide a more robust education component to the USLA Board of Directors meeting and conference, to draw in new attendees and to provide a greater opportunity for new-comers to be exposed to the business of the USLA by participating in committee meetings, discussions and social events. [2018_01_61_USLABOD_ConferencePlanningActivity.PDF] iii. Social Media (Mr. Tom Gill) Mr. Gill asked that his report stand as submitted. In addition, there is a proposed policy concerning social media in his written report that was to be discussed during the committee meeting. [2018_01_60_USLABOD_SocialMediaActivity.PDF]

Board of Directors Meeting adjourned until 11:00 a.m. on Saturday, April 28, 2018 Friday, April 27, 2018 – USLA Educational Conference Lifeguard Training Programs - Rick Romero, Marine Safety Lieutenant, City of San Diego Fire-Rescue Department

ICS Applications to Local Lifeguard Responses, and Lifeguard Functions in All Hazards Incident Management Teams for State & Federal Incidents – Daniel Douglas, Captain, Lifeguard Services, County of Los Angeles Fire Department; Danielle McMillion, Rescue Boat Captain, Lifeguard Services, County of Los Angeles Fire Department

Long Beach Marine Safety Dive Team and Swiftwater Rescue Team - Cameron Abel, Marine Safety Captain, City of Long Beach Fire Department

SALT (Surfer’s Awareness in Lifesaving Techniques) - Doug Leach & Sterling Foxcroft, Marine Safety Officers, City of Huntington Beach Fire Department; Leslie Schwene (Vice-President) & Greg Eisele, Huntington Beach Surf Lifesaving Association

Project Wipeout: The Next Generation - William Koon, MPH, Project Wipeout Program Coordinator, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Educational Conference Demonstrations- Long Beach Fire Department and 2 exhibitors Tours of the Long Beach Lifeguard Museum

Page 7 of 15

Saturday, April 28, 2018 – USLA Board of Directors & Committees

11:00 a.m. Board of Directors Meeting Call to Order – Mr. Peter Davis XIV. Committee Action Reports (Motions and voting limited to Officers and Regional Delegates) A. Standing Committees i. Executive Committee (Mr. Peter Davis) 1. Nationals 2018 – Due to the donation of $20,000 from the City of Virginia Beach, the competition is already close to a $30,000 profit. Mr. Zebrowski is in negotiations for a title sponsor and the committee discussed the value of working with tourist bureaus when hosting. 2. Meeting Restructure Proposal – This was proposed by the Mid-Atlantic Region and discussed at length in committee. The following proposal is from the Executive Committee, where it passed with 5 opposed (Pacific Islands, Southwest, Southeast, Advisor and Vice President) “The National body will be responsible for organizing future Board of Directors meetings unless a region states that they would prefer to organize it themselves.” The current regional rotation would remain the same. MPU 3. Executive Committee Voting – The Executive Committee asked the Bylaws Committee to work with the Legal Advisor on language for the Bylaws that will clarify the idea that one person can only carry one vote in the Executive Committee. 4. Board Communications – A healthy discussion was held related to respectful communication and efficiency of the Executive Committee. [2018_01_13_USLABOD_ExecutiveCommitteeAction.PDF] ii. Bylaws (Mr. Mike Wagner) 1. Policy Proposals – The committee discussed and approved policy proposals from the Lifesaving Sport and Social Media committees. These were brought to the floor under the appropriate committee reports. 2. Election Process – The committee discussed the tie-breaking process for elections and decided not to take any action to deviate from Robert’s Rules of Order. 3. Position Statements – The committee recommended that a section be added to the USLA website specifically for position statements as opposed to adding these to the Bylaws. This includes the recent position statement that was approved as the spring 2017 meeting with respect to public rescue tubes. 4. Contracts – The committee will put together language on signing contracts, specifically the roles of the President and Secretary and whether or not notarization is needed. 5. Executive Committee Voting – Mr. Wagner has reached out to the Legal Advisor to get clarification on his opinion concerning Executive Committee voting. [2018_01_45_USLABOD_BylawsAction.PDF] iii. Certification (Mr. Chris Brewster) 1. PRWC Training - A subcommittee intends to bring something finalized to the main Certification Committee next fall and hopefully we will then be able to move forward with a certification system for PRWC training. 2. Kelly Slater Wave Company – This company contacted the USLA to ask if we could certify them to meet our training standards. The committee voted (6 in favor and Mr. Falconer opposed) to advise the company that if they apply and meet our standards we would recommend certification. 3. Junior Lifeguard Training – The committee discussed an inquiry regarding whether components of junior lifeguard training should be allowed to be used as credit towards regular lifeguard training. The committee was not in favor. 4. Oxnard College Lifeguard Program – The committee was informed of a new college level lifeguard training program in Oxnard, California that involves 90 hours of training in addition to medical aid and CPR. This is the second college-level training program using USLA guidelines that we are aware of.

Page 8 of 15

5. Beach Vehicle Operations – The committee agreed that once the PRWC program is complete, they should begin work on a beach vehicle operations program. 6. Epilepsy – The committee recommended to the Medical Committee that they include a recommendation for some level of screening in the USLA Recommended Medical Exams if this is lawfully permissible. The chair will look into this and report back to the committee. 7. Resources – The Resource Materials section of the Lifeguard Agency Certification Program guidelines contains several titles that may be dated. A subcommittee led by Tony Pryor and including Tim Harmon and Duke Brown will review these materials and make recommendations for updates to the committee. 8. CPR and Emergency Medical Responder Courses – There are three CPR and two EMR courses known to fully comply with USLA requirements for agency certification. All of these are listed in Mr. Brewster’s written report. To further assist agencies, we will advise applying agencies that these courses are “preapproved”. 9. Minimum Medical Aid Course – The committee intends to identify specific medical courses for public safety personnel that can then be supplemented up to the 21-hour standard that will be brought for approval at the fall meeting. 10. First Aid Training Pre-Assignment - There was a request from an agency applying for recertification to modify the current standards that state “Medical aid and CPR training must be given and the swim standard met before the lifeguard is given any assignment on the beach. The remaining training must be provided within 30 calendar days from the first day of deployment of the lifeguard.” The committee considered this and there was no support for modifications to the existing standards. 11. Agency Certification Proposals – Mr. Brewster circulated a list of proposed agencies that is included in his written committee report. Motion from the committee to approve. MPU Proposal from Mr. Pryor to approve Lake Barcroft Association – Barcroft Beach Lifeguards which was a hold-over from the fall meeting. They are now in compliance with their AED. MPU 12. ARRT - The committee unanimously recommends to the Board the following changes to the ARRT guidelines: “3.5. Medical Aid and CPR Certification -- Must be certified as having successfully completed a medical aid course equivalent to U.S. Department of Transportation First Emergency Medical Responder, Emergency Medical Technician, or paramedic.” MPU 13. Manual - The committee unanimously recommends to the Board the following changes to the LACP guidelines: “A copy of the third edition of Open Water Lifesaving – The United States Lifesaving Association Manual (2017) must be available to each trainee.” Note: The online application will be updated to reflect the requirement. It is not presently mentioned in the application. MPU 14. Lesson Plans - The committee unanimously recommends to the Board the following changes to the LACP guidelines: “1.3 Agencies are encouraged to utilize the lesson plans provided by the United States Lifesaving Association. In developing course curriculum, the The Resource Material section may also be of assistance.” MPU 15. Manual (2) - The committee unanimously recommends to the Board the following changes to the LACP guidelines in the Resource Materials section: “The Open Water Lifesaving – The United States Lifesaving Association Manual, Third Edition United States Lifesaving Association, B. Chris Brewster - Editor, ISBN 0-536-73735-5 1-323-58456-0.” MPU 16. Certification Processing - The committee unanimously recommends to the Board the following update to the LACP guidelines: “1.5. The USLA Secretary Executive Director or designee will review the application for completeness, consult with the Chair of the Certification Committee, work with the applying agency to address any shortcomings, file one copy and then send the second a copy to a Certification Officer from the USLA region in which the agency lies. The Secretary Executive Director or designee will attempt to choose a Certification Officer who is geographically close to the applicant, but who is not employed or affiliated with the applicant. 1.6. Within sixty (60) thirty (30) days of receiving an application (sooner in urgent circumstances), the Certification Officer is responsible for conducting a

Page 9 of 15

thorough review and submitting written findings. The review must include, at a minimum, checking all documents submitted and ensuring that they show the agency to be in compliance with the current guidelines of USLA, at either the minimum or advanced level. It is also suggested, but not required, that an on-site review be conducted for most agencies. An on-site review is required for newly established agencies. 1.7. Upon receiving the written findings of a Certification Officer, the Secretary Executive Director or designee will file a copy of the findings and forward a copy to the Certification Committee Chair for review by the National Certification Committee. This committee, which normally meets in May and November in conjunction with the Board of Directors, is responsible for recommending approval or disapproval to the Board, with final approval requiring a majority vote of the full Board. In cases in which an applying agency fails to meet the necessary deadlines for application and can demonstrate that it would be prevented from operating as a result of a delay in approval until the next Board of Directors meeting, the Certification Chair, in consultation with the President, may provisionally certify an agency found to meet all requirements until the next Board of Directors meeting, at which time the Board of Directors shall approve or disapprove the application.” MPU 17. Swim Fins - Under current LACP certification guidelines, agencies are not required to have swim fins available for search and rescue, but only mask and snorkel. The committee agreed on a vote of six yes and one no (Mr. Wagner) to recommend to the Board a modification of the equipment guidelines as follows: “8.1.2. Mask(s), and snorkel(s), and swim fins readily accessible to mount an underwater search and rescue, as appropriate.” The current guidelines require training in the use of swim fins, but the certification application states, “Demonstrate the donning and use of swim fins in rescue, if swim fins are used by agency.” The application will be changed to reflect the requirements of the guidelines and the phrase, “if swim fins are used by agency,” will be deleted. MPU 18. CPR - The committee unanimously recommends to the Board the following update to the LACP guidelines: “Currently certified as having successfully completed a course in providing one person adult, two person adult, child and infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), including obstructed airway training, AED, BVM, and use of barrier devices, accepted by the Federal Government or by the state government in the state of employment (basic life support for healthcare providers).” MPU [2018_01_37_USLABOD_CertificationAction.PDF] i. Heroic Acts – Recognition, Awards and Presentations (Ms. Adrienne Groh) 1. Award Submissions - Submissions were read and approved unanimously. The complete list is included in the committee report. 2. Officials Awards - The committee has developed an award for incremental years of service for competition officials. The committee will be reaching out to regional presidents as well as the Lifesaving Sport Committee to create an accurate list and awards will be presented in Virginia Beach which also coincides with the 30th anniversary of the National Games. 3. Non-Lifeguard Medal of Valor – The Southwest Region has created a Medal of Valor category for non-lifeguard/military/public safety individuals or group for rescues that are extraordinary and put their lives in danger during the event. The committee discussed doing something similar for the USLA and two options were presented: 1. MOV for non- lifeguard/military/public safety or 2. Heroic Act with Valor. These options need to be discussed with each region and recommendations brought back to the fall meeting. [2018_01_35_USLABOD_HeroicActsAction.PDF] ii. Junior Guards (Mr. David Robinson) 1. Round Table Discussion – The committee discussed reasons they are passionate about junior lifeguard programs – recruitment for lifeguard positions, knowledge transfers, joy of working with kids, making kids water safe. 2. National Junior Lifeguard Program – The committee reviewed a letter from a parent on ideas that could better the National Junior Lifeguard Program including increasing agency participation and payment and grass roots efforts.

Page 10 of 15

3. Marketing – The committee discussed ways to better market the benefits of a junior lifeguard program: better website; participation in social media; quarterly email blasts; timeliness of receiving the membership benefits and better and increased swag. 4. Potential Partnerships – The committee discussed potential partnership with the John Wayne Cancer Foundation or another to develop a USLA ball cap or other gift that would only be given to Junior Guard members. 5. Community Service Program – The committee discussed the possibility of a National community service program or cadet program that could be merged with a USLA membership program. 6. ALM – The region that hosts the fall meeting will be asked to provide an ALM article and a piece of artwork for the membership gift. 7. Vice Chairs – Mr. Robinson is looking for one to two vice chairs to help run the committee. If anyone is interested, please let him know. 8. Membership Fees – Committee members were asked to go back to their agencies and regions to see if an increase in membership fees would result in a decrease in agency participation for those agencies that pay for JG memberships. They will also come up with a list of benefits to becoming a Junior Guard member. 9. Meeting Time – The committee requested a full two hour meeting time in the future. 10. Lifesaving Sport Recommendations – Brian Murphy made three motions to the committee regarding National Junior Lifeguard competitors and they were approved unanimously to be reviewed by the Lifesaving Sport Committee: a. Substitute rescue tubes for rescue cans in the Rescue Race b. Eliminate the 5-person swim relay and add a 3-person relay c. Add a 3-person board relay [2018_01_36_USLABOD_JuniorGuardAction.PDF] iii. Lifesaving Sport (Mr. Ed Zebrowski III) 1. 2018 National Championships – Mr. Gill gave an overview to the committee about the upcoming 2018 National Championships. 2. 2017 International Surf Rescue Challenge – The National Team placed third overall. 2019 is set for South Africa and the committee discussed the possibility of the US hosting in 2021. 3. ILS – Received updates on ILS activities including a proposal to double the size of National Teams, Lifesaving World Championships in Italy and new events. ILS has set a goal of having a lifesaving sport event in the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles, CA. 4. Rule Change Proposals – Proposals were received from the Southwest and Southeast Regions and are attached to the written report. Proposals will be voted on at the fall meeting. 5. Committee Goals a. Rule Book – Short term - correct discrepancies and clarify immediate issues prior to the summer. Long term – comprehensive reevaluation of the rulebook, Policies and Procedures, etc. to be submitted by the fall for spring 2019 action. b. Sport Development – Gather information from a variety of sources including surveys, other sport federations and internal exam of championship operations. c. Establish and implementation of early notification to members regarding craft scrutineering, eligibility requirements and sportsmanship expectations for National Championships. d. Research and implement an event pre-registration system. e. The committee has outgrown the 2 hour meeting every 6 months and they will look to try to have an ad hoc meeting at the National Championships and possibly coming a day prior to the fall Board of Directors meeting. f. The committee is looking for applicants for vice chair for Lifesaving Sport for Junior Lifeguards. 6. Action Items

Page 11 of 15

a. Proposal from the Lifesaving Sport Committee (Pacific Islands, Northwest, Southwest, Southeast, Gulf Coast in favor; Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, Great Lakes, New England opposed) to amend Policy VII-K to read: “These policy and procedures are intended to define the process for the selection of USLA National Team Managers and Coaches. A. SELECTION COMMITTEE 1. The USLA President shall appoint a selection committee comprised of three USLA Board of Directors to accept and review USLA National Team Manager and Coach position applications. 2. The USLA National Team Manager and Coach Selection Committee shall announce if any or all applicants will be interviewed for open positions. B. APPLICATIONS 1. Individuals who apply for any USLA National Team Manager or Coach positions must be current USLA dues paying members. 2. No application for any USLA National Team Manager or Coach positions will be accepted after the established application deadline. C. INTERVIEWS 1. The USLA National Team Manager and Coach Selection Committee shall interview the top applicants or all applicants depending on the announced process. D. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The USLA National Team Manager and Coach Selection Committee shall recommend individuals to serve as USLA National Team Managers and Coaches to the USLA President based on a review of all applications submitted by the established deadline and any interviews conducted by the selection committee. E. APPOINTMENT 1. The USLA President shall appoint USLA National Team Managers or Coaches considering the recommendations of the USLA National Team Manager and Coach Selection Committee following these policies and procedures. F. BACKGROUND CHECKS 1. All USLA National Team Manager and Coach appointments will be subject to passing a background check as determined by the USLA President.” The motion failed with 20 in favor (7 Southwest, 7 Southeast, 3 Northwest, 2 Pacific Island, 1 Gulf Coast) and 20 opposed (7 Mid-Atlantic, 7 South Atlantic, 2 Great Lakes, 2 Gulf Coast and 2 New England) b. Proposal from the Lifesaving Sport Committee to explore methodology to develop a USLA Lifesaving Sport Athletes Committee: Committee would provide athlete representation and a voice on issues related to Lifesaving competition as is required by all NGB’s in IOC sports. MPU [2018_01_34_USLABOD_LifesavingSportAction.PDF] iv. Membership (Mr. Charlie Hartl) 1. 2018 Membership Kit – The committee reviewed the 2018 kit items – neck gators (buffs) provided by Hobie and reusable shopping bags provided by Jersey Mike’s Subs. 2. Membership Processing – Processing will be the same as it has been in the past. 3. Recruitment Poster – The Southeast Region is working on a possible design for a membership poster. The committee will continue to work on this in the fall. 4. Hydroflask – Mike Silvestri brought a possible prodeal to the committee. Hydroflask currently has a prodeal and is willing to offer the deal to the members of the USLA. Mr. Hartl stated that there would be no need for a contract and they would like us to put the link on the USLA website. This passed in committee. Mr. Brewster asked if this was a sponsorship issue. Mr. Zebrowski stated that he would look at the proposal. [2018_01_33_USLABOD_MembershipAction.PDF]

Page 12 of 15

v. Public Education (Ms. Denise Blair) 1. Water Safety USA – The safety tip for the year is “Become Water Competent”. Mr. Brewster suggested that we review our current water safety tips and revise to include the Water Safety USA tips. A subcommittee will work on this project over the next six months. 2. Beach Safety Challenge – The committee voted to continue to hold the National Beach Safety Challenge. Submissions are due by July 15, 2018. The online submission form is on the website. 3. Grants – The committee reviewed and voted on several grant submissions and the submissions they voted to approve are contained in the written committee report. 4. USLA Videos – Mr. Gavin submitted a thumb drive with interviews for the History of USLA video project. The next step is to develop a script for the video. 5. Coloring Books – The committee discussed adding pages with lake and river content to the existing book. Once this has been completed, the committee will work to print more coloring books. 6. Website – The committee would like to see a Public Education button to click on and bring to a dynamic Public Education section and there is money for these updates. The committee will work with the web master on this project. 7. Project Wipeout – William Koon, a representative from Project Wipeout, reported to the committee that they have an advisory committee with a representative from each beach patrol agency and are finalizing a countywide beach safety curriculum. 8. Lesson Plans and Curriculum – The committee continues to work on developing lesson plans and curriculum on beach and water safety. 9. Evaluation – Mr. Goto suggested that the committee find a way to evaluate the effectiveness of our Public Education programs. Mr. Goto, Ms. Blair, Mr. Silvestri and Mr. Edgerton will work on this before the fall meeting. [2018_01_32_USLABOD_PublicEducationAction.PDF] vi. Ways and Means (Mr. Michael Bradley) 1. Motion from the Ways and Means Committee to approve a $500 reimbursement from the Public Education Committee to Phil Rogers for the work he has done with the Heritage interview project. MPU 2. Motion from the Ways and Means Committee to decline the proposed donation of $2,497.53 from the USLF to the USLA. MPU 3. Motion from the Ways and Means Committee that the USLA reimburse the Southwest region $750 to cover the Eye King Sponsor table. MPU [2018_01_28_USLABOD_WaysAndMeansAction.PDF] B. Working Group Committees (Motions and voting limited to Officers and Regional Delegates) i. Heritage (Mr. Jerry Gavin) Mr. Gavin submitted his action report on the first day of the meeting. [2018_01_54_USLABOD_HeritageAction.PDF] ii. Information Technology (Ms. Karissa Ickes) The committee did not meet. Mr. Brewster asked that Ms. Smiley communicate to committee chairs the option of using “Free Conference”. This would allow the different committees to work effectively between meetings. iii. Medical (Dr. Peter Wernicki) The committee did not meet. C. Project Groups i. Fundraising (Mr. Jim McCray) 1. Fund Raising Priorities - The committee discussed priorities of funding for the USLA, with public education generally being the top priority. A specific area for fund raising in public education was not finalized at this point. 2. Fund Raising Campaign – The committee would like to develop a campaign in an effort to assist the organization, specifically as it applies to the Board of Director, member and alumni donations. [2018_01_62_USLABOD_FundraisingAction.PDF]

Page 13 of 15

ii. Meeting/Educational Conference Planning (Mr. Michael Bradley) 1. Conference Format – The format the committee would like to use would involve stretching out some of the education and the committee meetings so it provides the opportunity to bring in new faces and to provide greater opportunity for those new-comers to be exposed to the business of the USLA through networking and participation in the committee meetings as well as the education sessions. 2. Policies and Procedures Proposal – The committee proposes that Policy III-C.E.1.a “The host shall organize an Educational Conference on Friday from 9am until noon.” be waived for the entirety of the fall 2018 meeting and conference. MPU 3. Content – The content of the educational conference will consist of both large body presentations in the main room and breakout sessions focused on different areas. The breakout sessions will follow two tracks with one focused on topics pertaining directly to lifeguarding and one focused on secondary topics such as Lifesaving Sport, management practices and current industry topics. In reference to committees needing more meeting time, Mr. Falconer suggested fractionalizing some areas of specific committees. Lifesaving Sport could have different sessions, for instance Lifesaving Sport athletes or competition rules and regulations. Mr. Bradley added that there will be a form coming out that is a call for sessions. The committee is also researching ways to offer Continuing Education Units (CEUs). 4. Sponsors/Exhibitors – The current layout of meetings does not provide ideal circumstances for exhibitors and sponsors to meet attendees. Moving forward, the group will take this into consideration by utilizing more focused times like lunches or receptions that are taking place with the sponsors in the room. [2018_01_61_USLABOD_ConferencePlanningAction.PDF] iii. Social Media (Mr. Tom Gill) 1. Social Media Policy - The group was tasked with putting together guidelines for the USLA to use when creating or promoting social media posts. The committee reiterated that we should be driving positive, public safety messages and not necessarily posting negative images that diminish confidence in the lifesaving community. The following is a proposal from the Social Media Project Group to add to the Policies and Procedures (Bylaws Committee to find appropriate section): “1. The President shall designate a limited number of representatives to make or forward posts on behalf of the USLA. 2. All social media posts shall be supervised by the USLA President or representatives appointed by the President. 3. Any posts created by or forwarded by the President of USLA or designated representatives should serve to highlight the following: a. Positive work by members b. Stories of interest in water safety c. Promotion of USLA sponsored or supported events d. Stories that serve to educate the public regarding beach safety 4. The USLA shall not post or forward stories, items that: a. Reflect negatively upon individual members or agencies b. Interject or promote stories based on employee versus employer contractual issues c. have content are mostly political in nature d. have legal ramifications 5. The USLA reserves the right to remove or delete posts made on USLA social media sites. 6. Members that believe a post violates the guidelines set forth should contact their regional leadership or the USLA Social Media representative to register his/her complaint. The President or social media designees will determine if the post should be removed.” MPU [2018_01_USLABOD_SocialMedia.PDF] II. Old Business (Motions and voting limited to Officers and Regional Delegates) There was no old business from the previous meeting. III. New Business (Motions and voting limited to Officers and Regional Delegates) A. Mr. Falconer nominated Chris Nowviski for the Junior Lifesaving Sport Co-Chair. IV. Open Forum and Announcements (Any USLA member may raise issues. Motions and votes limited to Page 14 of 15

Regional Delegates.) A. Mr. Zebrowski III stated that it is time to start the process of accepting bids for 2020 Nationals. Anyone interested should put their applications in for review in the fall. B. Mr. Hartl reported that Rosemary Daly was having some health issues. Please keep her in your thoughts. C. Mr. Butki asked that the meeting agenda be available sixty days in advance and that action reports be available as soon as possible after the meetings since many attendees rely on this information to take back to their organizations as justification to attend the meetings. Mr. Brewster stated that Ms. Ickes has been posting a generic agenda on the website since there are many working pieces to the agenda that might not be finalized until close to the actual meeting. D. Jo Wagenhals and the Southeast Region congratulated Mr. Gerry Falconer for being promoted to Operations Supervisor in Miami Beach. V. Future Meetings A. 2018 Fall: Southeast, Delray Beach, Florida, November 1-3, 2018 B. 2019 Spring: Gulf Coast, San Antonio, Texas, April 25-27, 2019. In addition, the Gulf Coast Region is hoping to offer a 3 day pre-conference swift water training class held in New Braunfels, Texas. More information to follow. VI. Privilege of the Chair – Mr. Davis opined that the USLA is moving forward in a really good way. The meeting was very well organized and the Educational Conference was robust with really relevant information. VII. Adjournment – Motion to adjourn by Mr. Foxwell. MPU

Page 15 of 15 United States Lifesaving Association President Activity Report

Date: 4/26/18 Officer: Peter Davis Introduction

As we start a new cycle for the leadership of the USLA, I’d like to thank those who served as board members, committee chairs, and committee vice chairs for the past two years. Ms. Groh and the Heroic Acts and Awards Committee has done a great job of formalizing the process of recognition of people who contribute much, and she will do something special to that effect today. This is one of the most important things we can do for those of us in this room and beyond these walls. USLA works because of the hundreds of volunteers and thousands of volunteer hours spent each year. Thank you all for your service and dedication. Thank you for traveling this important path together. I would also like to recognize those who stepped up to assume leadership roles on the board and in our committees for this next cycle. It’s a difficult thing to devote volunteer time when our work and our lives already require so much of us. Let’s remember how valuable our volunteers are. Let’s remember to treat each other with respect and honor for selflessly volunteering. And most importantly, let’s remember the culmination of our volunteer efforts and those of the thousands of guards working the beaches of the United States means so many rescues and medical interventions, and it means that countless people return home from our nation’s beaches safely. It is an honor to be here in the part of our country that played such an important historical role in beach lifesaving. And the Southwest Region honors us all by hosting us in such a beautiful place. Many thanks to USLA Vice President Beuerlein and SW President Bill Humphreys and everyone who made this happen because of all the hard work and attention to detail. We have something very special that we get to do today. We get recognize heroes that saved lives right here in Southern California. I can think of no greater act than risking your own life to save that of another human. We also get to share information, plan how to best serve our members, our agencies, and the hundreds of millions that use our country’s beaches. And we get to renew friendships with those who share our passion and commitment. Let’s use this precious time together wisely, keeping our focus on Lifesaving and Drowning Prevention. Let’s remember how much better, stronger, and more effective we are when we work as a group.

Activities and Accomplishments (Since Prior Board of Directors Meeting)

1. General Communication- Countless hours of phone calls, e-mailing, texts etc were spent by me and many others here at this meeting and within the broader USLA community to keep things running smoothly. 2. Combined Federal Campaign– Worked with Ms. Smiley on this although since most of the work has been transferred to her she is handling it very well with little input from me. 3. Nationals 2018/2019- Consulted with Mr. Zebrowski and Mr. Gill periodically on specifics of hosting USLA Nationals in Virginia Beach

Page 1 of 4 4. California Assembly Bill 489– I communicated with Mr. Williams as the USLA representative who is serving a four year term. Nomination information is typically announced in February by the Attorney General's office with applications due in late April. USLA has promoted the opportunity for nominations by making sure the California agencies are aware of this opportunity and the Liaison Officer and Information Technology Chair have been getting the word out to individual California members of USLA. Last year, the sole recipient in any public safety category for all of California was Oceanside, California Lifeguard David Wilson for a harrowing rescue on a jetty. He was given the award by Governor Jerry Brown. This was a landmark award in that it is the first award given to a lifeguard since California law was changed to allow ocean lifeguards to be considered and the USLA to have a representative on the evaluation committee. There were more details on this rescue in the winter edition of American Lifeguard Magazine. 5. National Weather Service – Sea Grant – USLA Collaboration Mr. Brewster and I have continued to attend to this relationship with input from Ms. Blaire and others, which has endured for over a decade. This included conference calls, review of videos, etc. Currently we are finishing work on revising the material based on public input, and bringing the NOAA and USLA websites in sync. Additionally, I have been working with a sub-committee of this group on a rip current video for the deaf and hearing impaired. Script is finished and it is in the production phase. 6. Water Safety USA- In 2014, the USLA, the American Red Cross and the YMCA of the USA proposed a national collaboration of water safety and drowning prevention organizations. That brought about the founding of Water Safety USA, a group comprised of 13 respected government and non-government organizations. Mr. Brewster presently acts as moderator of the group, handling leadership duties. Since November, the group has met bi-monthly by conference call and is preparing to issue a new safety message for the coming year which addresses the importance of designating a “Water Watcher”. 7. Voting- Had multiple discussions related to having one board member carry two or more votes, several of which were with the USLA Legal Advisor. Mr. More has given a legal determination that this is not allowed under our bylaws, therefore each EC member can only carry one vote (attachment 1). 8. Executive Director Contract and Oversight- Handled oversight and liaison with the EC with the help of Mr. Goto and Mr. Beuerlein. This includes reviewing and responding to monthly updates on the huge amount of work being accomplished by the Executive Director, Ms. Smiley. 9. E-Blast Newsletters: Worked with Ms. Ickes and Mr. Brewster to create these newsletters. 10. Legal- Worked with our attorneys and others on various legal issues involving USLA. One of these was related to a question raised related to members of the Executive Committee carrying more than one votes. Mr. More’s legal determination is attached (Attachment 1.) 11. Public Information- Worked alongside Mr. Gill, Mr. Brewster, Ms. Smiley, several regional presidents and others on various media related issues. Kudos to Mr. Gill for his judgment, tack, and work ethic in this area. 12. President’s Appointment Practice- Worked with input from Mr. Beuerlein and Mr. Goto on establishing a written document that outlines how committee appointments will be made during this presidency. 13. National Teams: Worked with Mr. Zebrowski lll and Mr. Gill to assist them in their activities. 14. Income and Sponsorship- Worked with Mr. Zebrowski II, Mr. Bradley, Ms. Smiley, and others on the following: 15. Sponsor Relations a. Da Fin – The most current Da Fin contract exists until August 31, 2021. Contract can be extended with mutual agreement. Total income has been in accordance with the

Page 2 of 4 contract. Income from Da Fin since the original contract was signed in 2006 has totaled approximately $40,000, not including ALM ads. ($4,000 in 2016). b. Ingram – This contract was first signed in 2009 and will now expire December 31, 2017. Income from Ingram since the original contract was signed in 2009 has totaled $40,000 ($5,000 in 2016). $5000 has been paid in 2017. Mr. Brewster negotiated a three year extension to the contract, which was signed in January 2018. $5,000 was paid in February of 2018. c. Eyeking – The most current Eyeking contract extends from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2017. Terms were the same as the previous contract. Income from Eyeking since the original contract was signed in 2008 has totaled approximately $40,000. Mr. Zebrowski has worked with the company and has a contract for one year with the same terms as the previous contract. They have also agreed to pay for part of the membership item that will be a buff. MPU Currently, Eyeking has 2 overdue invoices: 1st Quarter sponsorship for 2018 in the amount of $1,500 and ALM Winter 2018 Ad in the amount of $500. d. Prone 2 Paddle- This agreement was approved by the Executive Committee. The contract has been developed and is being reviewed by the USLA attorney. It will be signed once the review is complete. e. Hobie (Eyeking)- Contract was signed last October. They paid $1,500 on 1/02/2018. However, that was for the 4th quarter of 2017. They owe $3,000 for the first and second quarter of 2018. They also owe $500 for an ad in ALM. They owe a total of $3,500 and have been invoiced. f. Engine - Mr. Zebrowski reported that he has been working with Engine Swimwear who supplied officials’ uniforms at no cost and rash guards for participants at Nationals. Engine would like to become the “Official Swimwear of the USLA” and in exchange they have offered to supply officials’ uniforms at no cost, participants’ rash guards at cost, and to outfit the National teams at no cost for three years. Mr. Zebrowski estimated a value of $15,000-$20,000 for this deal. The representative of Engine did supply Mr. Zebrowski a contract but it has not been returned as of yet. He has spoken with them and there doesn't seem to be any issues.

16. Royalties a. ASHI - A contract with ASHI was approved in September 2014; the contract is now in force. Lifeguard agencies wishing to avail themselves of the favorable rates for first aid, EMR and CPR certification courses they can find details on the USLA website. We receive royalties for purchases by USLA affiliated agencies. The sales between September 2014 and April 23, 2018, totaled $39,149. ASHI reports that the USLA is on track to receive the 15% royalty payment for 2018 and agencies to continue to receive the 20% discount. Four new agencies have signed on with ASHI since January. b. smile.amazon.com – Amazon provides a percent of sales when customers choose to support the USLA through smile.amazon.com for all their Amazon shopping. Qualifying items purchased provide donations to USLA. Total income for 2017 was: $413.37. Total in 2018 so far is $100.21. We need to brand this better through e-blasts and other promotions. c. Pearson - USLA receives royalties for our textbook sales. The latest edition of the manual generated $4,585.90 in royalties in 2017. Lifetime income from all three editions is $33,307. d. DVD Sales (via UniServ)- We have received $10,006.78 in overall in sales proceeds since sales began, with $993.60 in 2016. Our cost for DVDs has totaled $6,994.49. We have over 800 titles of each DVD in stock. For 2017 we have received $861.12. We

Page 3 of 4 recently received a request from Marine Rescue Products to sell the videos and sold those 24 at $15 each. They will resell at the same price as us- $25 each. e. Uniserv Guard Gear - Catalog sales of clothing and related items via the Uniserv site resulted in $42.91 in income in 2016. For 2017 we have received $222.99. Recently they have taken down the site due to lack of sales. f. Office Depot - A contact was signed in March 23, 2012. USLA receives a 1.5% donation on total sales from Office Depot/Office Max. The contract was signed in March 23, 2012. We received $89.04 in 2016 and $75.88 in 2017. So far in 2018 we have received $0. Like Amazon Smile, this in another means of supporting the USLA that we need to showcase to our members. Attachments

1. Voting- Legal Direction- Mr. More 2. President’s Appointment Practice

Page 4 of 4

United States Lifesaving Association Vice-President Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Officer: Michael A. Beuerlein

Welcome to Long Beach! The Southwest Region is very pleased to host this meeting in a historic Southern California city that was selected due to its central location, proximity to airports and convention appeal. Long Beach has a rich lifesaving tradition and Marine Safety Chief Gonzalo Medina has demonstrated that this meeting has the full support of the City, the Fire Department, the Marine Safety Division, the LB Lifeguard Associations and the Port of Long Beach. I would like to thank the Board of Directors for the honor of serving as USLA Vice-President. So far, I have had the opportunity to participate in a number of USLA Executive Committee actions, have conferred with the USLA Executive Board on a number of matters and at the request of the USLA President, I have been reviewing the monthly activities of the USLA Executive Director. In addition, the USLA President has asked me to draft a document of our past practice for committee chair appointments for future consideration as a policy or procedure. I have submitted a first draft of this document. The majority of my association time since the first of the year has been spent as the Chairman of the Organizing Committee for the Spring 2018 USLA Board of Directors Meeting and Educational Conference. The Southwest Region would like to thank our meeting sponsors for making it possible to host this event. We have a lot of exciting activities, including a Harbor Cruise on Thursday evening (6 pm – 7:30 pm) hosted by the Port of Long Beach. This event will be complimentary to all delegates and their significant others. The only fee is for beverages. In keeping with our new emphasis on education, we have expanded our Educational Conference on Friday into a full day event. The morning session will be at the Hilton Long Beach in the traditional classroom setting, and the afternoon session will feature a double-deck bus ride to the Long Beach Marine Stadium for a BBQ hosted by the Long Beach Lifeguard Alumni Association. After lunch, we will have demos by two exhibitors and the Long Beach Marine Safety Dive Team and Swiftwater Rescue Team. After the demos, we will tour the Long Beach Lifeguard Museum before returning to the hotel by 5:30 pm. This event is complimentary for registered delegates and exhibitors only. Additional guests may attend by registering in advance for $50. Additional guest may also register to attend the closing banquet on Saturday night for $50. We are looking forward to a harmonious meeting where we can work together to accomplish the USLA mission, goals and objectives.

Page 1 of 1 United States Lifesaving Association Secretary Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Officer: Nikki Bowie

Introduction

Thank you to the Southwest Region for all their work in hosting. I hope that we can look past perceived regional boundaries and recent disagreements to make this a productive meeting and that we are respectful of each other’s beliefs and ideas. The Fall Board of Directors meeting in Vancouver marked a new direction that we can hopefully continue with in our Educational Conference. If one of our goals is to bring new attendees to our meetings and expose younger members to the USLA, we must support the efforts of those assigned to expand the Educational Conference. I ask that if anyone has questions or concerns about the minutes I produce after each meeting that they contact me directly. I have always been open to feedback and can answer questions directly instead of going through other members or officers since I record every meeting.

Activities and Accomplishments (Since Prior Board of Directors Meeting)

1. Produced the meeting minutes from the 2017 Fall Board of Directors meeting in Vancouver, BC. 2. Conducted five evotes with the Executive Committee. All are listed on the draft agenda. 3. Answered inquiries about the meeting minutes from Vancouver and was asked to produce audio proof of verbiage on an action item vote concerning the location of Nationals for the next two years. Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration

1. Committee chairs and officers are asked to turn in activity and action reports as outlined in the Policies and Procedures so that the meeting minutes and meeting agenda can be completed in a timely manner.

Page 1 of 1 United States Lifesaving Association Treasurer Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Officer: Michael Bradley

Introduction

It is good to be back in the warm California sun. Thank you Southwest Region for hosting the spring meeting here in Long Beach. Since our last meeting in Vancouver, we have closed out the 2017 fiscal year. Making better use of invoicing, we have been able to better follow up on monies owed to the USLA for various items such as ALM, membership and sponsorship. I would like to extend a special thanks to the Executive Director as she has been an intricate part of the overall invoicing process.

Activities and Accomplishments (Since Prior Board of Directors Meeting)

1. Acted on behalf of the USLA on all financial matters. 2. Completed the 2017 Audit and Tax filing. 3. Followed up on outstanding 2017 invoices. 4. 2017 Budget Notes 4.1. Certification Revenue was $6,500 over budget. 4.2. Dividends from the investment of USLA reserves generated over $2,600 in dividends paid. 4.3. Membership Revenue was under budget $7,216.00. Outstanding membership invoices were a big component of this shortage. 4.4. Royalties were up $3,700 over budget. This was largely due to sales of the new USLA Textbook. $3,803.43 was received in 2017. So far in 2018 we have received $1,034.83 already. 5. 2018 Budget Notes 5.1. Annual $14,000 contribution to the National Travel team has been allocated. 5.2. The annual YM fees for hosting the USLA website have been paid. 5.3. The ILS membership fees have been paid.

Attachments

1. 2018 YTD Balance Sheet 2. 2018 YTD Profit and Loss Budget

Page 1 of 3

United States Lifesaving Association BALANCE REPORT As of April 11, 2018

Total

ASSETS Current Assets

Bank Accounts

Bank of America

Bank of America Checking 16,731.69 Bank of America Maximizer 30,857.66 Total Bank of America $ 47,589.35 Fidelity Investments 228,694.71 Paypal 5.11 Total Bank Accounts $ 276,289.17 Total Current Assets $ 276,289.17 TOTAL ASSETS $ 276,289.17 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY Liabilities

Current Liabilities

Credit Cards

Credit Card

Avila 3,102.01 Barrows 5,510.92 Bradley 15,212.62 Payment Account (23,825.55) Total Credit Card $ - Total Credit Cards $ - Total Current Liabilities $ - Long-Term Liabilities

Competition - National Team 27,527.76 Youth National Team 9,864.39 Total Competition - National Team $ 37,392.15 Mexican Lifesaving Fund 24,083.30 Statistics Software Project 12,000.00 Total Long-Term Liabilities $ 73,475.45 Total Liabilities $ 73,475.45 Equity

Unrestricted Net Assets 229,278.62 Net Revenue (26,464.90) Total Equity $ 202,813.72 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $ 276,289.17

Page 2 of 3

United States Lifesaving Association PROFIT & LOSS BUDGET vs. ACTUAL 2018 January - December 2018

Total

Actual Budget over Budget

Revenue

ALM Revenue 9,481.00 20,048.00 (10,567.00) Awards/Presentations Income 50.00 (50.00)

Certification Fees 10,175.00 28,500.00 (18,325.00) Donations 335.96 3,600.00 (3,264.04) Event Registrations 16,295.00 31,500.00 (15,205.00) Interest 1,072.60 2,007.00 (934.40) Lifesaving Sport Income 109,000.00 (109,000.00)

Membership Dues 9,000.00 160,955.00 (151,955.00) Royalties 2,099.60 7,380.00 (5,280.40) Sponsorship 6,574.01 19,000.00 (12,425.99) Total Revenue $ 55,033.17 $ 382,040.00 $ (327,006.83) Gross Profit $ 55,033.17 $ 382,040.00 $ (327,006.83) Expenditures

Administration 17,514.59 62,000.00 (44,485.41) American Lifeguard Magazine 12,026.74 35,000.00 (22,973.26) Awards & Special Presentations 230.67 3,000.00 (2,769.33) Credit Card Charges 2,019.48 6,700.00 (4,680.52) Donation 515.00 1,635.00 (1,120.00) Event Host 169.75 31,500.00 (31,330.25) Information Technology 7,699.55 8,950.00 (1,250.45) Insurance & Bonds 7,000.00 (7,000.00)

International Relations 3,746.80 10,500.00 (6,753.20) Junior Lifeguards 1,000.00 (1,000.00)

Lifesaving Sport 14,690.65 84,580.00 (69,889.35) Membership Kits 16,920.85 50,000.00 (33,079.15) Office Expenses 94.78 600.00 (505.22) Presidential Discretionary Fund 1,000.00 (1,000.00)

Professional Fees 4,114.45 5,300.00 (1,185.55) Public Education 15,000.00 (15,000.00)

Regions % of Member Dues 1,197.00 40,295.00 (39,098.00) Uncategorized Expenditure (0.72) (0.72)

USLA Travel and Meetings 558.48 16,400.00 (15,841.52) Total Expenditures $ 81,498.07 $ 380,460.00 $ (298,961.93) Net Operating Revenue $ (26,464.90) $ 1,580.00 $ (28,044.90) Net Revenue $ (26,464.90) $ 1,580.00 $ (28,044.90)

Page 3 of 3 United States Lifesaving Association Executive Delegate Activity Report Date: April 26, 2018 Officer: Kyle Maxwell Activities and Accomplishments: (Since Prior Board Meeting)

1. Aided the President and the Executive Board during several discussions and voting sessions that arose since Vancouver. 2. Assisted the Professional Development Committee in preparing for the educational component of the Fall BOD in Florida. 3. Stepped down as President of the Pacific Northwest to better serve this office and the national body as a whole. United States Lifesaving Association Advisor Activity Report

Date: April 25, 2018 Officer: Ralph S. Goto

Activities and Accomplishments (Since Prior Board of Directors Meeting)

1. Consulted with President Davis and Vice President Beuerlein on matters regarding by-laws and policies and procedures.

Attachments

1. In response to a recent increase in snorkel related fatalities, the Hawaiian Lifeguard Association conducted a Snorkeling Safety Workshop to discuss possible causes and solutions. A copy of the agenda is attached; a report of proceedings will be posted in the near future. 2. SLSA Australian Summer Drowning Report (Dec 2017 – Feb 2018) attached

SNORKELING SAFETY WORKSHOP WEDNESDAY, MARCH 28, 2018, 8:00 AM – 4:30 PM

HILTON HAWAIIAN VILLAGE RAINBOW SUITE AND DUKE KAHANAMOKU LAGOON

Page 1 of 3

AGENDA

8:00 Registration, Continental Breakfast Rainbow Suite 9:00 Welcome, Introductions Kaala Souza 9:15 Opening Remarks R. Goto 9:25 DOH Advisory Task Force Update B. Velasco 9:45 Epidemiology of Snorkel Related Drownings Dan Galanis, PhD 10:15 Physiology of Drowning Elizabeth Char, M.D. 10:30 Risk Factors and Possible Causes of Snorkel Related Drownings Philip Foti, M.D. 11:00 Effect of Pre-Existing Medical Conditions Christopher Happy, M.D. 11:30 Report of Findings and Testing of Various Masks/Snorkels Dr. Foti Colin Yamamoto

1200 – 1:00 LUNCH

1:00 - 2:00 Snorkeling Safety Best Practices Alan Hong, Retired Hanauma Bay Manager Captain Jenna Morris, Dolphin Excursions Lt. Cmdr. Simone Mause, USCG 2:00 – 2:45 Breakout Groups: Develop Strategies and Messaging to Mitigate Risks 2:45 – 3:00 BREAK 3:00 – 3:30 Reports from Breakouts Call to Action 3:30 – 4:30 Demonstrations and Hands on With Equipment Duke Kahanamoku Lagoon

4:30 Adjourn

Page 2 of 3

Page 3 of 3 United States Lifesaving Association Liaison Officer Activity Report

Presentation Date: April 26, 2018 Officer: B. Chris Brewster

Introduction It is my pleasure to serve as the Liaison Officer for the USLA. My primary role is to maintain liaison and interface with all national and international organizations. I am also designated to be the primary delegate to the International Lifesaving Federation. Of course I have handled that assignment for many years and continue to do so as President for the Americas Region of the ILS. I also take on projects as assigned by the President and sometimes propose projects that I think might be beneficial to the USLA.

Activities and Accomplishments (Since prior Board of Directors meeting) 1. Special Projects 1.1. National Drowning Registry: The International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification is used to code and classify morbidity (illness, injury, etc.) data from inpatient and outpatient records, physician offices, and most National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) surveys. Injuries and deaths are coded based on several factors, including setting. The data is made available online by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This helps researchers, policy-makers, and others identify where and how people are injured. Unfortunately, natural bodies of water are not broken down by location. This prevents easy reference for how many drowning incidents occurred in the ocean versus other bodies of water, for example. In consultation with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and with their assistance, I submitted a proposal on behalf of the USLA recommending more specific breakdowns of accident locations in drowning accident data (Attachment 1). In March I presented this proposal to the ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee at a national meeting in Baltimore hosted by the CDC and the NCHS. There were many proposals submitted, mostly by doctors and medical researchers. The proposal was well received, and I will report back on whether some or all will be adopted. 1.2. Rip Current Statistics Paper: Rick Gould, Dr. Rob Brander, and I are coauthoring a paper that corrects some misinformation in the science literature about the percent of rescues attributable to rip currents. This paper uses USLA statistics as the primary reference. This has involved a large amount of work on the part of all of us, but includes some excellent outcomes and graphics we will share in future. I presented this work at the World Conference on Drowning Prevention. We intend to soon submit the paper to a peer reviewed science journal.

Activity Report, USLA Liaison Officer: Page 1 of 3 1.3. Rip Current Paper: Collaborated as a coauthor on a peer reviewed paper entitled “Public perceptions of a rip current hazard education program: “Break the Grip of the Rip!.” (Attachment 2) This paper was published in the journal Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences. My professional attribution in the article is as a representative of the USLA. 1.4. Water Safety USA: The USLA is a founding member of Water Safety USA, a group comprised of 14 national organizations (www.watersafetyusa.org). I act as moderator of the group and handle many administrative tasks. Over the last six months I chaired the annual meeting (October 2017), have moderated telephonic meetings, and have responded to inquiries on behalf of the group. Water Safety USA will soon announce our safety theme for 2018. We are also in the process of developing a strategy to create a national water safety plan. 1.5. NOAA: Mr. Davis and I have an ongoing relationship with various NOAA representatives. Over the past several months we have been working intensely via conference calls to update the national rip current signs, brochure, and websites to reflect the latest science and to better inform the public. 1.6. Textbook: I maintain the liaison with our publisher to ensure our royalties are correct and to maintain our relationship. As of December 31, 2017, 1,052 copies of the 3rd had been sold, yielding a royalty to the USLA of $4,586. 1.7. Legal Matters: At the request of the President I handle the relationship with our attorney. There have been several matters we have addressed. 1.8. Twitter: I handle this account for the USLA and endeavor to tweet contemporaneous issues of interest. 2. Routine Business 2.1. International Life Saving: Maintain relations internationally and oversee the Americas Region of the ILS as president. Participated in the board of directors meeting in Vancouver, as well as the World Conference on Drowning Prevention. 2.2. Sponsorship: I assist Mr. Zebrowski, Jr. from time to time with sponsorship issues, particularly legacy issues. 2.2.1. Ingram: Negotiated a contract extension with Ingram for $5,000 in licensing fees each year. 2.2.2. P2P: Assisted with creating the contract and having it reviewed. 2.2.3. Engine: Assisted with creating the contract and having it reviewed. 2.2.4. EyeKing (Hobie): Assisted with creating the contract extension and having it reviewed. 2.3. Lifesaving Device: Provided input and advice to a Spanish inventor developing a throwable rescue device. 2.4. Training Video Sales: Coordinated a request by Marine Rescue Products to sell our training videos. 2.5. USLA Logo: Responded to an inquiry regarding acceptable use of the USLA logo by a chapter.

Activity Report, USLA Liaison Officer: Page 2 of 3 2.6. Public Rescue Tubes: Responded to an inquiry from New Zealand and Australia with respect to the USLA position on this matter. Referred the inquirers to the Board decision in Brewster as our policy. Please see Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration. 2.7. Contact Forms: Responded to various inquiries from the USLA website on behalf of the USLA referred to me by Ms. Ickes. 2.8. Media: I coordinate with and assist Mr. Gill regarding media inquiries. These have included a variety of inquiries 2.9. Website: Worked to support Ms. Ickes in her ongoing work, most recently a sensitive issue of changing the DNS records.

Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration • At our April 2017 meeting, the Board of Directors adopted a position statement on public rescue tubes. At present, this statement is buried in the minutes of the meeting. Should the USLA created a more prominent location for position statements or add this to the Policies and Procedures? Attachments • ICD-10 proposal for drowning coding • Public perceptions of a rip current hazard education program: “Break the Grip of the Rip!”

Activity Report, USLA Liaison Officer: Page 3 of 3 Attachment A United States Lifesaving Association

PO Box 366  Huntington Beach, California 92648  Tel: 866-FOR-USLA (866-367-8752)

www.usla.org

January 8, 2018

Peter Davis President ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee. Rob Williams National Center for Health Statistics Vice-President 1600 Clifton Road Nikki Bowie Atlanta, GA 30329-4027 Secretary

Michael Bradley RE: Proposal for new codes — drowning Treasurer On behalf of the United States Lifesaving Association, I respectfully submit the Ed Zebrowski III Executive Delegate attached proposal for additional codes related to drowning.

B. Chris Brewster Liaison Officer The United States Lifesaving Association works nationally in drowning prevention, primarily in the natural environment. We are a partner of the Ralph Goto Advisor National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in work to prevent drowning in rip currents. We are a founding member of Water Safety USA, a national Dr. Peter Wernicki collaborative group of drowning prevention organizations including the Medical Advisor American Academy of Pediatrics, American Red Cross, Boy Scouts of America, John “Chip” More , Legal Advisor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Park Service National Safe Boating Council, National Swimming Pool Foundation, Safe Kids Worldwide, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, USA Swimming Foundation, and YMCA of the USA. We are the full member of the International Life Saving Federation for the United States.

As our submission notes, there is a lack of codes to identify areas where drowning injury and death occur in the natural environment. This stymies efforts to strategically target public education, prevention, and rescue resources. Presently, the best sources are media accounts, which are unreliable and lack a central database. We expect that greater specificity in the codes will help us and other organizations prevent injury and death due to drowning.

I would be pleased to respond to any questions regarding our submission.

Sincerely,

B. Chris Brewster Liaison Officer [email protected] Direct line: 619-807-7777 #274- DROWNING DRAFT/P - FOR MARCH 2018 Drowning/submersion occurring in natural bodies of water

Drowning is the third leading cause of unintentional death worldwide.i It is also a leading cause of unintentional death in the U.S., resulting in more than 4,500 deaths in 2016.ii Nonfatal drowning is far more prevalent and can have lifelong, debilitating consequences. For every child who dies from drowning, another five receive emergency department care for nonfatal submersion injuries.iii In 2015, there were approximately 6,300 emergency department visits and 2,500 hospitalizations for non-fatal drowning/submersions (all ages).iv

Prevention is key to reducing the burden of drowning, but drowning prevention receives relatively little attention and few resources. Prevention takes various forms such as public education, learn-to-swim programs, and the provision of lifeguards. The ability to target resources to prevent drowning could be enhanced by a detailed understanding of where drownings occur. Drowning occurs both in human-made (e.g., bathtubs, pools, fountains, tanks) and natural bodies of water (e.g., lakes, rivers, oceans). More than half of fatal and nonfatal drownings in the U.S. among those 15 years and older (57% and 57% respectively) occurred in natural water settings.v Studies have shown that the percentage of drownings in natural settings increases with age.vi

While ICD-10-CM provides specific external cause of injury codes for drowning/submersion in different types of human-made locations (e.g. W16.011, W16.021, W16.031, W16.211, W16.221, W16.311, W16.321, W16.331, W16.511, W16.521, W16.531, W22.041, W65, W67, W73, X71.0-X71.2, X92.0- X92.2, Y21.0-Y21.3), the codes for drowning/submersion in natural settings are limited (i.e., refer only to “natural water” without greater detail). Y92 ‘Place of occurrence of external cause’ codes are also limited. The only Y92 code that refers to a natural water site is Y92.832: “Beach as the place of occurrence of the external cause.” However, a beach could exist at a small pond, a large lake, a river, or the ocean. As well, drowning does not actually occur on a beach, but in offshore water.

The United States Lifesaving Association and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration joined forces over 10 years ago to attempt to prevent rip current drowning, which occurs in the waters off beaches with surf, since surf is the primary generator of rip currents. The lack of data regarding the number of drowning injuries and deaths in the waters off surf beaches has made it very challenging to affix the magnitude of the problem, set goals, marshal prevention resources, and benchmark injury prevention success. This is equally true for other natural venues. The United States Lifesaving Association is requesting new codes for drowning/submersion that occur in the following types of natural settings:

• Oceanfront • Ocean – protected bay or inland waterway • Great Lakes • Pond, lake, reservoir • River • Flooded area

#274- DROWNING DRAFT/P - FOR MARCH 2018 Ocean beaches are unique in that they feature surf and rip currents, among other hazards. Ocean bays do not feature surf and rip currents, but have unique hazards related to cyclical tidal currents and scouring of the bottom. The Great Lakes are large enough to generate surf and rip currents, but not as reliably as the oceanfront, where surf is generally larger and more prevalent. Rivers feature relentless currents (typically unaffected by tides) and bottom scouring, along with various obstructions (e.g. rocks, trees, etc.) Ponds, lakes, and reservoirs are generally more benign than the foregoing, lacking hazards related to currents or surf, but for this reason tend to attract less accomplished swimmers, and thus appear to be locations for substantial numbers of drownings. Flooding is the second leading cause of weather-related death, most typically due to drowning.vii Separating deaths during flooded periods can allow specific preventive and response resources to be targeted.

TABULAR MODIFICATIONS

New subcategory W69 Accidental drowning and submersion while in natural water

Delete Accidental drowning and submersion while in lake Delete Accidental drowning and submersion while in open sea Delete Accidental drowning and submersion while in river Delete Accidental drowning and submersion while in stream

New code W69.1 Accidental drowning and submersion while in oceanfront water

New code W69.2 Accidental drowning and submersion while in Great Lakes

New code W69.3 Accidental drowning and submersion while in open sea

New code W69.4 Accidental drowning and submersion while in ocean bay Add Accidental drowning and submersion while in Inland waterway

New code W69.5 Accidental drowning and submersion while in lake Add Accidental drowning and submersion while in pond Add Accidental drowning and submersion while in reservoir

New code W69.6 Accidental drowning and submersion while in river Add Accidental drowning and submersion while in stream

New code W69.7 Accidental drowning and submersion while in flooded area

New code W69.8 Accidental drowning and submersion while in other natural water

i Fact Sheet. 2017. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs347/en/ ii WONDER. Accessed January 5, 2018. iii Unintentional drowning: Get the facts. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/water-safety/waterinjuries-factsheet.html. Accessed January 7, 2018. iv WISQARS. Accessed January 5, 2018. #274- DROWNING DRAFT/P - FOR MARCH 2018 v Unintentional drowning: Get the facts. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/water-safety/waterinjuries-factsheet.html. Accessed January 7, 2018. vi Nonfatal and Fatal Drownings in Recreational Water Settings -- United States, 2001-2002. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, Vol. 53, no. 21, 447-452. June 4, 2004. vii Weather related fatalities. 2016. National Weather Service. http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/hazstats.shtml Attachment B Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1003-2017 © Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Public perceptions of a rip current hazard education program: “Break the Grip of the Rip!”

Chris Houser1, Sarah Trimble2, Robert Brander3, B. Chris Brewster4, Greg Dusek5, Deborah Jones6, and John Kuhn5 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, N9B 3P4, Ontario, Canada 2Department of Geography, Texas A&M University, 810 O&M Building, College Station, 77843-3148, Texas, USA 3School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia 4United States Lifesaving Association, Huntington Beach, CA 92648, USA 5NOAA/National Ocean Service, Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services, 1305 East West Highway, SSMC4 #6636, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA 6National Weather Service, Marine, Tropical, and Tsunami Services Branch, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA

Correspondence to: Chris Houser ([email protected])

Received: 9 January 2017 – Discussion started: 30 January 2017 Revised: 12 May 2017 – Accepted: 31 May 2017 – Published: 4 July 2017

Abstract. Rip currents pose a major global beach hazard; 1 Introduction estimates of annual rip-current-related deaths in the United States alone range from 35 to 100 per year. Despite increased Rip currents (often called “rips” or “rip tides”) are strong, social research into beach-goer experience, little is known narrow seaward flows driven by alongshore variations in about levels of rip current knowledge within the general pop- wave setup landward of the breaker zone. Due to their de- ulation. This study describes the results of an online sur- pendence on wave breaking, rips can develop in any beach vey to determine the extent of rip current knowledge across environment in oceanic, sea, and lacustrine environments. the United States, with the aim of improving and enhanc- Castelle et al. (2016b) classify rips as (1) boundary rips that ing existing beach safety education material. Results suggest develop along both natural and engineered structures includ- that the US-based “Break the Grip of the Rip!”® campaign ing headlands, groins and piers; (2) bathymetric rips that de- has been successful in educating the public about rip current velop in response to the variability of the nearshore morphol- safety directly or indirectly, with the majority of respondents ogy; and (3) hydrodynamic rips that are spatial and tempo- able to provide an accurate description of how to escape a rally variable and develop in the absence of morphological rip current. However, the success of the campaign is lim- variations or a lateral boundary. The type of rip that devel- ited by discrepancies between personal observations at the ops on a beach depends on the local wave climate and geol- beach and rip forecasts that are broadcasted for a large area ogy. For example, rips in the Great Lakes tend to be associ- and time. It was the infrequent beach user that identified the ated with natural headlands or the presence of large groins largest discrepancies between the forecast and their observa- or harbor jetties, while rips in Florida and Texas tend to be tions. Since infrequent beach users also do not seek out life- bathymetrically controlled and associated with a transverse guards or take the same precautions as frequent beach users, bar and rip nearshore morphology (Houser et al., 2013). Rips it is argued that they are also at greatest risk of being caught also vary regionally based on the driving forces, with rips on in a dangerous situation. Results of this study suggest a need the Great Lakes typically associated with moderate to strong for the national campaign to provide greater focus on locally winds, while on the West Coast of the United States the rips specific and verified rip forecasts and signage in coordina- are often associated with large swell events independent of tion with lifeguards, but not at the expense of the successful the wind. national awareness program.

Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 1004 C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program

Rips are capable of carrying unsuspecting bathers signif- ing occurring on that beach (see Barrett and Houser, 2012; icant distances away from the shoreline with speeds reach- Houser et al., 2015; Trimble and Houser, 2017). ing over 2 m s−1. As a consequence, rips are considered a Informing the public about the rip current hazard has be- major public health problem in the USA, Australia, Costa come a national priority in several countries including the Rica, and many other countries (Short and Hogan, 1994; United States (e.g., Ashley and Black, 2008; Brannstrom et Klein et al., 2003; Hartmann, 2006; Sherker et al., 2008; al., 2014), Australia (e.g., Sherker et al., 2008; Brighton et Sabet and Barani, 2011; Woodward et al., 2013; Arun Ku- al., 2013), United Kingdom (e.g., Woodward et al., 2013), mar and Prasad, 2014; Arozarena et al., 2015). In Australia, and Costa Rica (Arozarena et al., 2015). The United States rip currents are believed to be responsible for approximately has arguably the longest running cooperative and coordinated 13 000 beach rescues per year (SLSA, 2016) and an aver- public rip current education program operating across var- age of 21 confirmed deaths per year (Brighton et al., 2013), ious organizational and political levels (Carey and Rogers, which exceeds fatalities caused by most other natural haz- 2005). The Rip Current Task Force was convened in 2003 by ards (Brander et al., 2013). While it has been estimated that the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) 30–40 individuals drown each year in rip-current-related in- and USLA to establish consistent rip current education ef- cidents in the United States (Gensini and Ashley, 2010), forts and improve sharing of rip current rescue data across Lushine (1991) suggested that rips may account for up to 150 the United States. Subsequently, with the assistance of the fatal drownings per year and the United States Lifesaving As- National Weather Service (NWS) and Sea Grant, a national sociation (USLA) estimates this number to be over 100 per “Break the Grip of the Rip!”® education campaign was ini- year. USLA’s National Lifesaving Statistics Report (2012) tiated in 2004. The Break the Grip of the Rip!® campaign indicates that over 82 % of surf beach rescues in the US are aimed to educate the public about the rip current hazard rip current related and they therefore surmise that 82 % of all by providing information about what rip currents are, why fatal drownings at beaches are associated with rip currents. they are dangerous, how to identify them, what to do if Beach users’ vulnerability to drowning in a rip current caught in one, and how to help someone else if they are depends on a combination of nearshore hydrodynamic and caught in a rip current. Aspects of this information have been bathymetric conditions, personal and group behaviors, and disseminated through various means such as the NWS Rip the beach safety and rip current knowledge of the individ- Current Safety web page (http://www.ripcurrents.noaa.gov/), ual (e.g., Houser et al., 2011a, b, 2016; Brander et al., 2011; brochures, beach signs, videos, newspaper articles, and pub- Caldwell et al., 2013). Morgan et al. (2009) identified that lic service announcements on television. lacking rip current knowledge was associated with rip cur- While this campaign was the first of its kind globally, it rent drownings, as was gender, age, alcohol consumption, was also particularly challenging given that the United States and overconfidence in swimming ability. Recent evidence has four very different coastlines (West Coast, East Coast, suggests that while most beach users are aware of rip cur- Gulf Coast, Great Lakes) that differ in terms of wave climate rents and the hazard they pose, they are not able to identify and beach systems, and a large inland non-coastal population a rip current (Sherker et al., 2010; Caldwell et al., 2013; who may only visit any of these coastlines infrequently. Re- Brannstrom et al., 2014). More than 80 % of beach users sults from Brannstrom et al. (2015) suggest that while most surveyed in Florida and Texas failed to identify rip currents beach users in Texas were not familiar with the campaign in photographs, usually by incorrectly identifying areas of itself, many were familiar with a key message of the cam- breaking waves as the most hazardous swimming conditions paign on “what to do” when caught in a rip current. This (Brannstrom et al., 2014). This is consistent with results of suggests that the campaign may have been successful in ed- Sherker et al. (2010), who argued that most beach users are ucating beach users and reducing the number of drownings, unable to identify a rip current and that “beachgoers clearly but this hypothesis has never been formally tested. need to know what a rip looks like to actively avoid swim- The core visual image used in many of these interven- ming in it” (p. 1787). Given sufficient information, it is pos- tions was a simple diagrammatic illustration of an idealized sible for beach users to identify a rip current with confidence rip current from an oblique aerial perspective (Fig. 1). In (Hatfield et al., 2012). However, the ability to identify a rip this image, the rip current is characterized by relatively calm current or to recognize posted warnings about the rip current white water surrounded by more intensive wave breaking ad- danger is not a guarantee that a beach user will be safe, par- jacent to the rip and close to the shoreline. An image template ticularly because many will still choose to swim in unsafe was created that could be accessed online and in hard copy and unpatrolled sections of the beach, away from the pres- and duplicated freely to be posted along boardwalks, beach ence of lifeguards, for social or behavioral reasons or because fronts, and public beach access points throughout the United of a lack of awareness and/or complacency (Drozdzewski States. The image has also been more recently adopted in et al., 2012, 2015; Williamson et al., 2012; Houser et al., other countries such as Thailand, Costa Rica, Mexico, South 2016). Recent evidence suggests that beach access manage- Korea, and Japan. While the NOAA–USLA sign was not in- ment can inadvertently steer unsuspecting beach users to- tended to teach the general population to identify a rip, the wards rip-prone areas, increasing the chances of a drown- prominent image of a rip current on the sign and attempts to

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program 1005

lessly. The lack of consistency in forecasting is complicated by rip development being dependent on how the incident wave field interacts with the pre-existing nearshore morphol- ogy, which is difficult to predict without local knowledge on how it evolves over a range of spatial and temporal scales. Since perception of the rip hazard depends in part on trust in experts and authorities, and trust in the protective measures they employ (Njome et al., 2010; Heitz et al., 2009; Terpstra, 2011; Terpstra et al., 2009; Barnes, 2002), inaccuracies in the forecast or a discrepancy between the forecast and what is observed at a specific beach at a specific time can erode con- fidence in the forecast (Siegrist and Cvetkovich, 2000; Es- pluga et al., 2009). Lack of confidence in forecasts could po- tentially condition beach users to downplay the hazard warn- ing on future visits (Hall and Slothower, 2009; Scolobig et al., 2012; Green et al., 1991; Mileti and O’Brien, 1993). Fur- thermore, the generic nature of the rip current forecasts can Figure 1. Rip current warning sign developed by the United States ® result in situations where the actual intensity of rips varies Rip Current Task Force as part of the “Break the Grip of the Rip!” substantially from the forecast. Beachgoers could easily ob- education campaign. serve a discrepancy between their beach location and the rip forecast, caused by either the generalized nature of the fore- cast or their inability to identify a rip current (Caldwell et al., post the sign on beaches indicate that its function and visual 2012; Brannstrom et al., 2014, 2015). argument constitute an invitation to beach users to use the in- The national US rip current education program is clearly formation to identify rip currents (Brannstrom et al., 2015). an impressive effort yet many rip-current-related fatalities Due to this conflict between its’ theoretical and practi- and rescues still occur on US beaches and overseas (Gensini cal use, the NOAA–USLA rip current sign has proven to and Ashley, 2010) and there is little quantitative evidence be mostly successful in regard to educating beachgoers on available to assess the overall effectiveness of the program. “what to do” (e.g., swim parallel to the beach) when caught in This is largely because no “pre-program” study was con- a rip current, but it has not been particularly successful in im- ducted on public understanding, perception, or behavior in proving beach users’ ability to identify rip currents from the relation to the rip current hazard. There is also a lack of hard perspective of standing or sitting on the beach (Brannstrom et data on rip-current-related fatalities, beach visitation num- al., 2015). Consistent with results of Matthews et al. (2014), bers, and how incident frequency and exposure rate may have only a small percentage of beach users (< 50 %) recalled ob- changed over time. In this regard, NOAA sponsored a work- serving rip current warning signs on beaches in Florida and shop in 2015 to review the Break the Grip of the Rip!® pro- Texas (Caldwell et al., 2012; Brannstrom et al., 2014) despite gram and NWS rip current forecasts to discuss whether exist- their widespread occurrence at beach access points. How- ing messaging is scientifically sound, as well as effective and ever, it is important to note that despite observing and un- clear in reaching all age groups and demographics (NOAA, derstanding a warning sign, it is well established that some 2015). people will not take the appropriate actions to prepare for It was acknowledged at the NOAA workshop that while or avoid the hazard (Siegrist and Gutscher, 2006; Karanci et there have been several recent studies to describe the ex- al., 2005; Hall and Slothower, 2009; Jóhannesdóttir and Gís- tent of rip current knowledge amongst beach users (or lack ladóttir, 2010). thereof) on specific beaches in the United States (Caldwell In a separate initiative, the NWS has endeavored to de- et al., 2013; Brannstrom et al., 2014, 2015), there is insuffi- velop a public rip current forecasting system, although the cient understanding about beach user knowledge of rip cur- methodology varies among weather forecast offices (WFOs). rents and their behavior at the beach at a national level. This Some WFOs issue surf zone forecasts that include a three- study describes results of a national online survey focused on tiered (low, moderate, high) rip current outlook communi- US-based beachgoers and their understanding of, and expe- cated to the public during television and radio news broad- rience with, the Break the Grip of the Rip!® program and the casts (Carey and Rogers, 2005) and social media platforms. rip current hazard to provide quantitative evidence to guide Some WFOs work with local lifeguards to update their out- future improvements to beach safety education material and looks based on real-time observations. However, as discussed forecasting efforts. in NOAA (2015), these forecasts are not necessarily com- municated or disseminated in a consistent manner through- out all regions and, therefore, are not communicated seam- www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 1006 C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program

Figure 2. Photographs used in questions 42 through 44 of the survey to ask respondents, “Where on this photograph would you swim?” The location of the rip current in each photograph is shown by the red arrow, which was not visible to the respondents.

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program 1007

Table 1. Question groups used to elicit responses from respondents notified about the survey by various agencies in the United States.

Group Focus of questions Example topics 1 Informed consent 2 Non-identifying personal information ZIP code, age, ethnicity, and beach use 3 Swimming behavior Self-assessed swimming ability 4 Beach behavior and beach safety information Frequency of visits; perceived risks at the beach 5 Rip identification and knowledge Description of a rip current; ability to identify rip current in a photograph 6 Memorability, conspicuity, comprehension, priming Source of rip information; memory of observing rip safety warnings warnings 7 Rip current sign knowledge and understanding Understanding rip current warning signs and warnings

2 Methodology cohort managed to capture respondents who use each of the coastlines in the continental US. Respondents were evenly The study research design relied on an Internet-based survey distributed by age (> 18 years); each 10-year range between instrument using Qualtrics, approved by the relevant human 21 and 60 garnered about between 320 and 420 respondents. subject protection program from Texas A&M University. The A slight majority of the respondents were female (55 %). survey consisted of questions re-phrased from Sherker et al. (2010) and photograph-based rip current identification 3.1 Familiarity with the Break the Grip of the Rip!® protocols (Fig. 2) modified from Brannstrom et al. (2014, campaign 2015), with questions grouped into six categories (Table 1). The survey had 75 questions and took approximately 20– Only 18 % (n = 304) of respondents reported hearing about ® 30 min to complete. It remained open from May to August the Break the Grip of the Rip! campaign with nearly iden- 2015 and all answers were recorded anonymously through tical split by gender and age. Approximately 40 % of respon- Qualtrics Survey Software. A copy of the survey instrument dents reported hearing about the campaign either through a is provided in the Appendix of this paper. brochure/pamphlet (n = 120) or at the entrance to a beach The survey was distributed by email to cooperating or- (n = 119), whereas 163 respondents (54 %) reported hearing ganizations and individuals for distribution though listservs, about the campaign through various sources on the Internet. websites, social media, and in advertisements. It was dissem- Ninety respondents reported having heard about the cam- ® inated via secure Internet and social media links for Texas paign from the Break the Grip of the Rip! website. When A&M University, Sea Grant, Science of the Surf, NWS, and asked what “break the grip of the rip” means, most respon- the NOAA. While this Internet-based recruitment process at- dents (familiar with the campaign) reported (to varying de- tempted to target a much wider demographic of the US popu- grees of accuracy) that it was designed to provide informa- lation, it is also reasonable to assume that as the host websites tion about what to do if caught in a rip current: were all beach and surf-related, survey respondents likely – “Do not try to fight the current, instead work with the had greater interest in, and understanding of, coastal environ- current until you can break free of its pull.” ments and hazards, leading to a potential bias that was also experienced in a beach-safety-related study by Drozdzewski – “Advises affected swimmers not to struggle while head- et al. (2012). ing shoreward but to swim parallel to the beach till out of the off-beach current.”

3 Results There were, however, several respondents (familiar with the campaign) who believed that the messaging was not ap- Between May and August 2015, a total of 2084 respon- propriate and needed to be rethought: dents started the online survey, but only 1622 completed – “The slogan is useless to anyone caught in a rip current! all questions (completion rate: 78 %). Geographically, the What can you do by knowing this slogan? . . . ‘Wave, largest number of respondents were from the state of Texas Yell & Swim Parallel’ is a far better slogan . . . it pro- = (n 368) where Texas Sea Grant and the local NWS of- vides three lifesaving pieces of information. The exist- fice conducted significant advertisement for the survey. Large ing slogan provides nothing.” numbers of respondents also came from North Carolina (n = 214), California (n = 184), and Florida (n = 130), with – “It’s an advertising slogan; it doesn’t mean much at all. most remaining states having < 50 respondents. Of the 50 US It’s a bad slogan; it does not tell folks what to do, what states, only Nebraska did not have a respondent. Overall this to watch for, or anything useful.” www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 1008 C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program

Figure 3. Percent of self-reported beach visitation by respondents.

Figure 4. Relative importance of beach and surf factors to respondents when selecting a beach. Note that respondents were asked to identify all factors that applied.

Responses from those who were not familiar with the cam- tended to frequent beaches with strong wave activity (χ 2 = paign were much shorter and did not contain the level about 111, ρ < 0.01), suggesting a greater understanding of wave survival strategies provided by those familiar with the cam- conditions. There was no statistically significant variation in paign. Representative responses include “how to escape”, wave description based on home state, suggesting that per- “tips to survive”, and “how to get out of a rip”. ception of wave activity is largely based on frequency of beach visitation and other personal characteristics. In terms 3.2 Beach preference of choice of beach visited, wave activity and the potential hazard posed by rip currents or the absence of lifeguards are As presented in Fig. 3, most respondents visited the beach less important than cleanliness and at the same level of im- either once per year on vacation (22 %) or multiple times per portance as crowds (Fig. 4). year (42 %). Visitation exhibits a statistically significant re- When determining which beach to visit, frequent beach lationship with age, with older respondents (> 40) visiting users, who were mostly board riders, tended to prefer 2 = the beach more often than younger respondents (χ 46.5, beaches with lots of waves, whereas infrequent users em- ρ < 0.01). Perceived wave size on beaches visited by re- phasized safety and cleanliness (χ 2 = 159, ρ < 0.01). Fre- spondents depends on age and frequency of beach visitation quent beach users also believed it was very important to swim with older respondents who visit the beach frequently tend- near a lifeguard, while infrequent users did not (χ 2 = 51, ing to report beaches they visited having strong waves, while ρ < 0.01). Across both groups, however, respondents sug- younger respondents, who tended to visit the beach infre- gested they would still enter the water even if a lifeguard 2 = quently, identified the beach as having small waves (χ 84, was not present, suggesting that recognition about the impor- ρ < 0.01). In general, respondents who visit the beach infre- tance of lifeguards is not consistent with behavior in select- quently tend to describe the beach as having small waves and ing where and when to swim (Fig. 5). Frequent beach visitors that their primary beach activity is swimming and/or wad- were also more confident in their ability to “always” spot a ing. All respondents who visit the beach frequently (weekly rip current in contrast to infrequent beach visitors (χ 2 = 247, or daily) identified board riding as their main activity and

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program 1009

Figure 5. Self-reported tendency to enter the water in the absence of a lifeguard on a beach.

Figure 6. Percent of respondents’ belief that rip currents can be seen by beach users.

ρ < 0.01). Those who visit the beach less often (e.g., sev- 3.4 Ability to identify a rip current eral times per year or month) believed they could spot a rip “sometimes” or believed it is not possible to see a rip current, When asked “Where on this photograph would you swim?”, consistent with the response from all respondents (Fig. 6). approximately 54 % of respondents correctly identified the location furthest away from the rip current in Photograph 3.3 Swimming ability 1 (Figs. 2a and 8a). However, 182 (11 %) respondents in- correctly selected the rip current as the safest location to Most respondents (∼ 52 %) self-identified as competent enter the water, with the remaining respondents identifying swimmers (Fig. 7) and reported in a separate question that other areas of the photograph (adjacent to the rip) as be- they were capable of swimming between 25 and 100 yards ing the safest location. Results of a z test suggest that re- (22.8 and 91.4 m) or more than 100 yards (91.4 m) with- spondents who selected the rip as the safest location are sig- out having to stop or pause in open water (χ 2 = 1391, nificantly younger than those who correctly identified the ρ < 0.01). Respondents who self-reported as highly com- safest location in the photograph (z = 12.1, ρ < 0.01). Those petent open water swimmers (n = 213, 12 %) primarily be- who correctly identified the safest location in the photograph lieved they could swim more than 500 yards in open wa- also visited beaches more frequently (z = 6.1, ρ < 0.01) and ter without resting, while those who self-reported as weak self-reported beaches they visited as having strong waves swimmers (n = 566, 31 %) believed that they were only ca- (z = 6.4, ρ < 0.01). Most respondents who identified the pable of swimming 25 yards or less. Those who identified rip as the safest location self-reported never having swim- as highly competent or weak swimmers tended to have the ming lessons (z = 2.8, ρ < 0.01) and described themselves narrowest range of self-reported ranges of swimming abil- as weak swimmers in both pools (z = 3.7, ρ < 0.01) and ity, while those who self-identified as competent swimmers open water (z = 6.2, ρ < 0.01). Those same respondents also had the widest range of self-reported swimming distances for self-reported that it was important to swim near a lifeguard both pools and open water. (z = 5.8, ρ < 0.01) but tended to not consider hazards be- fore going to the beach, unlike respondents who were able to correctly identify the safest spot to enter the water (z = 14.1, ρ < 0.01). www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 1010 C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program

Figure 7. Percent of self-reported swimming ability in a pool and in open water with waves.

When asked what beach features they believed to be most dangerous, respondents who correctly identified the safest swimming location away from the rip were more likely to report alongshore currents and rip currents as dangerous fea- tures, while those who selected the rip as the safest location tended to identify jellyfish, sharks, and big waves. Respon- dents who incorrectly selected the rip current as the safest location were also least familiar with the common US beach safety flag system (z = 11.5, ρ < 0.01) and tended to have not heard of rip currents (z = 17.3, ρ < 0.01). Respondents who selected the rip as the safest location did not understand what was meant by a “high risk” (z = 3.2, ρ < 0.01) or a “low risk” (z = 7.5, ρ < 0.01) of rip current development as broadcast by some NWS services. The same respondents also noted that rip forecasts are apt to be inconsistent with the conditions they encountered on the beach, in contrast to re- spondents who correctly identified the safest location in the photograph and noted that forecasts tended to be consistent with their experience (z = 3.3, ρ < 0.01). Approximately 25 % of respondents (n = 630) incorrectly identified the left side of the groin (with an active rip) as the safest spot to enter the water in Photograph 2 (Figs. 2b and 8b). Like the responses to Photograph 1, those respon- dents tended to be younger (z = 5.2, ρ < 0.01), go to the beach infrequently (z = 7.8, ρ < 0.01), and self-report waves being relatively small (z = 7.3, ρ < 0.01) and their swim- ming ability in open water to be relatively poor (z = 2.2, ρ < 0.01). These respondents are also unlikely to consider hazards before going to the beach (z = 10.9, ρ < 0.01), are unfamiliar with the common beach flag system in the United States (z = 12.5, ρ < 0.01), do not understand the defini- tion of a “high-risk” of rip current development (z = 4.2, Figure 8. Identified location of safest location to enter the water ρ < 0.01), and believe that rip forecasts are not consistent in the photographs presented in questions 42 through 44 and also with their personal beach experiences (z = 2.8, ρ < 0.01). presented in Fig. 2. Warm (red) colors indicate large number of re- Unlike responses for Photograph 1, those respondents who sponses, while cold (blue) colors indicate few responses. No color incorrectly identified the rip as the safest location were not (background picture) represents areas that received no responses. significantly different (at the 95 % confidence level) from those who correctly identified the safest location (right side ® of the groin) with respect to pool swimming, swimming near the Break the Grip of the Rip! campaign, or their perceived a lifeguard, type of water activity at the beach, knowledge of ability to use the sign to identify a rip current.

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program 1011

A similar pattern was observed in respondents’ ability to As previously noted, the rip current warning sign was not identify the safest location to enter the water in Photograph 3 designed to help beach users identify a rip current but rather (Figs. 2c and 8c), with 26 % of respondents incorrectly iden- to inform them how to escape a rip. Most respondents could tifying the rip current as the safest location. Like responses clearly state what the sign was informing them about swim- for the other photographs, respondents who identified the rip ming parallel to the beach to escape a rip: as the safest location to enter the water did not visit beaches as often (z = 4.5, ρ < 0.01), self-reported having relatively – “Let the current take you out and then swim parallel the limited swimming ability in pools (z = 3.1, ρ < 0.01) and shore to escape.” = open water (z 2.8, ρ < 0.01), and did not believe it was – “Swim parallel to the shore, or wait until the rip gets = important to swim near a lifeguard (z 3.0, ρ < 0.01), un- less strong further offshore.” like those who correctly identified the safest location to enter the water in the photograph. Respondents who selected the Of the respondents, 96 % could provide a response to this rip current as safe for swimming were not as familiar with question and virtually all responses indicated that the sign the flag system used in the United States (z = 5.6, ρ < 0.01), informed them to swim parallel to shore to escape the rip rip currents (z = 3.9, ρ < 0.01), or the Break the Grip of the current, suggesting that the sign has been effective in com- Rip!® campaign (z = 4.4, ρ < 0.01). These respondents also municating this message. When asked how seeing this sign did not understand what was meant by a “low risk” (z = 2.5, would change their behavior of the beach, a majority (65 %) ρ < 0.01) and a “high risk” (z = 3.4, ρ < 0.01) of rips. How- of respondents suggested they would take precaution when ever, unlike photographs 1 and 2, no statistically significant entering the water: difference was observed between those who correctly or in- correctly identified the safest spot to enter the water with re- – “Might avoid going in water if I see surface signs of rip spect to age, self-reported wave activity, swimming lessons, activity and drive to another beach.” behavior in the absence of lifeguards, importance of check- – “Consider not going in. Look carefully for signs of rips. ing for hazards, or the ability to use the sign to identify a rip Look for flags and lifeguards.” current. This suggests that while most respondents understood that 3.5 Response to the rip current warning sign the sign provided them with information on how to escape a rip current, it also helped with prevention as most respon- Only 31 % of all respondents believed the NOAA rip cur- dents also noted that they would take precaution or use it to rent warning sign could be used to identify a rip current. In- spot (and presumably avoid) a rip rather than focus on escape terestingly, those respondents who incorrectly identified the strategies. rip current as the safest spot on the beach to enter the wa- Most respondents (86 %) provided ideas on how to im- ter tended to believe that the NOAA rip current warning sign prove the rip current warning sign, with more than half sug- could not help a beach user identify a rip current. This con- gesting the sign needed to provide a more accurate depiction trasted with those who correctly identified the safest location and/or description of a rip current: in any of the photographs (z = 5.2, ρ < 0.01). When asked to describe how the sign could be used to identify a rip cur- – “I don’t think it clearly identifies it enough that the rent, some of the latter respondents were able to relate the rip waves will not break where a rip current is. It is great in the picture to a real rip: because it shows how to get out of one but I think with another picture of an actual rip current people would – “It shows that in a rip current, there appears to be a break identify them easier.” in the water, with water moving in a different direction.” – “It shows you the ‘calm’ area between the two areas of – “Pictures showing what actual rip currents look like normal wave activity indicating the channel where the would be useful./Most casual beachgoers are not con- rip is located.” fident that they could identify a rip current from shore or predict where one might be forming.” Most of these responses focused on the pattern of wave breaking and the orientation of the “calmer” water to the – “There needs to be more info on how to detect, recog- beach. There is evidence that some respondents believed the nize and avoid a rip current. Information on conditions picture to be an accurate representation of a rip, but they during which rip currents are most likely to form would could not provide specific detail about the real-world features also be useful.” on the beach it depicted, for example “graphic depiction of A small number of respondents (< 10 %) suggested that what the tide looks like”. This suggests that some respon- the sign should either include step-by-step instructions on dents believe the sign is accurate since it was designed and what to do and/or provide more information about the ex- placed there by an authority. perience of being caught in a rip current: www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 1012 C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program

– “Multiple steps: (1) know when you’re in a rip; (2) stay 3.7 Forecasts calm and tread water; (3) wait until you’ve floated out to a slower moving water; (4) swim sideways.” Respondents were also asked about whether they were aware of rip forecasts, if forecasts altered their behavior, and if the – “Specific instructions on what one should do if caught in forecasts conformed with their observations at the beach. a rip current – Should I swim left, right, straight? What Since existing rip forecasts are not consistent and few are if I’m not a strong swimmer? What are some other exit based on an understanding of pre-existing morphology, the options?” focus here was not on the actual accuracy of the forecast but on whether the respondent believed the message to be Another group of respondents (∼ 15 %) either did not pro- consistent with their observations. About half of respondents vide suggestions on how the sign can be improved or noted (52 %) reported seeking information about beach and surf that it only needed minor edits, including space for local conditions before going to a beach with the majority (83 %) emergency numbers and contacts. A small number of respon- using the Internet to find that information. A large majority dents (< 5 %) believed that the sign should include state- (88 %) of respondents stated that information about beach ments that elicit fear amongst beach users including state- and surf conditions affected their behavior, with many say- ments such as “Rip currents can drown you”. ing that they would either “not go” (to the beach), “not go in 3.6 Prevention the water”, or “look for rips”. When asked whether the rip current forecast (either high or low) was consistent with con- One in four (25 %) respondents reported they had been pre- ditions they experienced at the beach, approximately 67 % viously caught in a rip current by accident, while 10 % of of respondents stated that the forecasts were not necessarily respondents reported that they had purposely entered a rip consistent with their observations. For some, this inconsis- for surfing. When asked how to escape a rip, those who had tency reflected the temporal and spatial broadness of the rip accidently been caught in a rip current provided relatively forecast compared to what they observed: detailed responses that either described escape by swimming – “Weather changed quickly and no beach flags were parallel or riding the current without panic: posted, advising of rip currents.” – “Let it flow. Don’t fight it. Perhaps as long as you min- – “Rip currents cannot be predicted for individual imize tiring exertions try to flow towards the side of the beaches, they are blanket warnings.” current. Basically do the same thing you’d do if you fell in a strong river about to empty into a lake. You certainly Other respondents noted the forecast was inaccurate be- wouldn’t kill yourself trying to swim out upstream.” cause other beach users had not adjusted their behavior:

– “Don’t panic!!! Either swim – without too much exer- – “I never noticed an[y] thing unusual and people in gen- tion – parallel to the beach for 25+ yards, OR tread wa- eral don’t seem to adjust their behavior.” ter and allow yourself to be carried out until the rip loses power, then swim parallel to the beach. Once out Others noted it was not possible to determine whether the of the rip, swim back towards shore (again in a relaxed forecast was accurate because they were not able to spot a rip manner, taking time to prevent exhaustion). When near- on the beach at that specific time or in general: ing the beach, take care not to get drawn back into the rip by water flow parallel to the shoreline.” – “I couldn’t determine if/where rip tide activity might be in the water if the forecasts had warned beach-goers to Of those who had not been previously been in a rip 7 % be aware of a high risk on that day.” (n = 36) did not provide a description of how to escape. The = remaining respondents provided relatively short responses In several cases (n 59), respondents noted they had not that described escape through combinations of swimming heard a forecast warning of the rip hazard on a given day or parallel and relaxation in general through responses such as “I don’t know if I’ve Assuming no response is an indication of a lack of knowl- ever heard a rip current forecast?” edge about rips, the number of respondents who did not pro- Additional questions about high-risk rip conditions so- vide an accurate description of how to escape a rip current licited written responses that suggest many respondents un- is ∼ 9 %, suggesting that overall the campaign has been suc- derstood the high-risk warning to mean that wind and wave cessful in informing beach users to (1) not fight the current; activity are tantamount to the development of rips: (2) swim out of the current, then to shore; (3) if you can’t – “Due to tides, weather, etc., there is a much greater risk escape, float or tread water; and (4) if you need help, call or for rip currents in the ocean.” wave for assistance. There was a mix of responses in which respondents be- lieved that “high risk” meant that rips would form or that

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program 1013 there was a greater chance of rip formation. Others (n = 102) While this is an encouraging result, it needs to be placed in believed that the use of the terms high and low risk were mis- context. The goal of this study was to examine US-based leading: beachgoers’ understanding of, and experience with, the na- tional Break the Grip of the Rip!® program and the rip cur- – “Whenever or wherever there are waves there can be rip rent hazard to provide quantitative evidence for improving currents, so I am not sure what “high” or “low” risk of the program. Despite the dissemination of the online survey rip currents means. All rips are potentially dangerous.” leading to a potentially biased cohort (Sect. 2) that was dom- In response to the definition of low risk, respondents inated by respondents who were relatively frequent beachgo- tended to suggest this implied that rips were unlikely or ers, self-rated as competent swimmers, and could success- would not form: fully identify the safest location to enter the water based on photographs, approximately 10 % of survey respondents – “Rip currents may still exist but are weaker or fewer were infrequent beachgoers, poor swimmers, largely igno- than normal.” rant of the rip current hazard, and more liable to make poor swim location choices. – “Conditions are not conducive to rip currents.” When taking the entire US beach-going population into – “The factors necessary for rip currents to form are ab- account, this cohort represents a significant population of po- sent – not likely to encounter rip.” tential “at-risk” beachgoers. Given that this population was a key target of the Break the Grip of the Rip!® campaign, it is Of note, whether a respondent described high and low risk therefore of considerable concern that this cohort (i) tended of rips as a probability (likely, unlikely) or in absolute terms to select the rip current as the safest location to enter the (is or is not present) is not related to whether the respondent water on each of the survey photographs, (ii) did not con- noted that the rip forecast was consistent with their observa- sider hazards before going to the beach, (iii) were not fa- tions at the beach. For both high and low risk, some respon- miliar with the beach flag system in the United States, and dents believed that the forecast (by radio, Internet, etc.) was (iv) did not seek out lifeguards when visiting a beach. These not based on the predicted weather but rather on whether a results clearly highlight how at risk infrequent beach users rip had been sited on a beach or not with statements such still are despite the decadal existence and ongoing presence as “not sighted” or “strong rips observed”. Others (n = 129) of the campaign. believed that high and low risk was associated with the local In contrast, survey respondents who were frequent beach- bathymetry being conducive to the formation of rips: “the to- goers and had previous experience with rip currents had a pography/bathymetry is suited to rip currents”. better understanding of what rip currents were, the danger they represent, and how to escape from a rip. As described 3.8 Trusted sources of information by Brannstrom and Houser (2015), those who get caught in a rip current “understand the dangers of rips first hand and . . . Respondents were also asked to rank sources of information realize [they] never want to be caught in that situation or acci- about rip currents from (1) most trusted to (5) least trusted. dent [again].” Similar results were found in studies involving Except for social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.), all sources surveys of people who had been caught in rip currents in Aus- of information were nearly equally ranked from most to least tralia (Drozdzewski et al., 2012, 2015). Those with indirect trusted with no discernable pattern. Only social media exhib- or no experience tend to underestimate the danger compared ited a discernable pattern, with more than 35 % of respon- to those with direct experience (Ruin et al., 2007). dents identifying it as the least trusted source, although 18 % It is also interesting to note that while many survey respon- of respondents also identified it as the most trusted. More dents were not familiar with the Break the Grip of the Rip!® respondents identified Internet sources as the most trusted campaign itself, a clear majority (∼ 91 %) understood the pri- compared to other sources, while television and radio were mary message of the campaign and were able to provide an identified as trusted (rank 2 and 3), but not the most trusted. accurate explanation of the message (i.e., “break the grip”). No significant correlations were observed between trust in Respondents previously familiar with the campaign provided a source of information and respondent demographics, sug- detailed explanations of how to escape a rip by swimming gesting that a broad communication strategy is the most ef- parallel and/or floating until the current weakened, indicat- fective to reach the widest audience. ing they may also have gained this knowledge from other sources. 4 Discussion Survey results also suggest that other factors can influence behavioral response in relation to the rip current hazard. For The primary results of this US-based rip current survey are example, as noted by several survey respondents, if everyone summarized in Table 2. Results suggest that while many are else at the beach is entering the water and not heeding an not aware of the Break the Grip of the Rip!® campaign, the existing rip current warning (out of ignorance or purposeful US beach-going public is informed about rip current safety. neglect), there is a chance that the beach user may become www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 1014 C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program

Table 2. Summary of major findings from the “Break the Grip of the Rip!”® national rip current survey.

Focus of questions Example topics Beach preference Frequency and purpose of visits to a beach affect perception of surf conditions, importance of swimming near a lifeguard, and self-reported ability to spot a rip current Swimming ability Range of self-reported swimming ability (distance in open water) related to self-reported com- petency Ability to identify a rip current Ability to identify safest location in a photograph related to frequency of beach visits, self- reported swimming competency, and training Ability to identify safest location related to perceived importance of and concern about surf haz- ards, self-reported understanding of “high” and “low” risk conditions, and perceived accuracy of rip forecasts Response to warning sign Perceived ability to use sign to identify a rip current varied with ability to identify safest location on a photograph Sign has been effective in communicating swimming parallel as an escape strategy and taking caution when entering the water Identified need to provide a more accurate depiction of a rip current, detailed instructions on how to escape a rip current, and local emergency information Prevention Break the Grip of the Rip!® campaign has been successful in informing beach users to (1) not fight the current; (2) swim out of the current, then to shore; (3) if you can’t escape, float or tread water; and (4) if you need help, call or wave for assistance. Forecasts Self-reported change in behavior based on forecasted beach and surf conditions, but tendency for forecasts to be inconsistent with observations Perceived inaccuracy of forecast related to spatial and temporal broadness of forecast, inability to identify a rip, and behavior of other beach users Trusted sources of information No significant correlations were observed between trust in a source of information and respon- dent demographics complacent and also enter the water despite understanding downplay the rip current risk on future beach visits. While the risk. This suggests that decisions can be made based on forecast methodology varies by WFO, most rip forecasts do what other beach users are doing rather than rip forecasts not consider bathymetry, local topography, or hard structures (Lapinski et al., 2014). The tendency to follow the behavior that may force rips over a range of wind wave conditions. It of others may be enhanced when someone goes together as is also not clear how many forecasts are based on the actual part of a group and enters the water because everyone is will- presence of rips observed by lifeguards. fully ignoring the risk or is ignorant to the severity of the risk The key problem is that rip forecasts tend to be generalized (see Mollen et al., 2012; Arozarena et al., 2015). A regional for a large region and time, whereas actual rip development forecast or global warning will not necessarily deter beach and flow behavior is extremely variable over space and time user behavior as much as direct intervention by lifeguards. (Castelle et al., 2016a). It is also difficult to predict the po- This study has also revealed some important issues with tential for rip development without an understanding of the existing rip forecasting methods and resultant warnings (Ta- pre-existing nearshore morphology, which itself is difficult ble 2). Approximately 67 % of all respondents stated that to measure directly, remotely, or through numerical model- rip current forecasts are not necessarily consistent with what ing. A static daily regional rip warning may therefore fail to they observe on the beach. Consistent with previous studies replicate different rip conditions that occur during that day. on natural hazards, those who have not experienced a pre- For beachgoers, this can lead to a different interpretation of dicted hazard or did not experience personal damage during the forecast accuracy and may potentially lead to downplay- a visit to the beach are more likely to downplay the danger ing the actual risk (see Brilly and Polic, 2005). Mileti and the next time they visit (Hall and Slothower, 2009; Scolobig O’Brien (1993, p. 40) describe this reasoning as “The first et al., 2012; Green et al., 1991; Mileti and O’Brien, 1993). impact did not affect me negatively, therefore, subsequent Any inconsistency between a rip forecast and direct obser- impacts will also avoid me.” At the same time, beach users vations therefore has the potential for some beach users to will not be able to conceptualize events that have never oc-

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program 1015 curred or to see future trips to the beach as anything more rip escape strategies (McCarroll et al., 2014; Van Leeuwen et than a mirror of past visits or experiences (Kates, 1962; Tver- al., 2016), which clearly showed that natural variance in rip sky and Kahneman, 1973). If the rip forecast and warnings flow behavior influences effectiveness of different rip escape are inaccurate or perceived to be inaccurate by the beach user, strategy strategies. This has also been illustrated by recent there may also be a potential loss of trust in that authority numerical modeling studies (McCarroll et al., 2015; Castelle (Espluga et al., 2009) and future forecasts. et al., 2016a, b). However, communicating such a complex It can be assumed that beach users who rely heavily on and mixed message is problematic. In contrast, concepts of rip forecasts and assume they are accurate might use them rip avoidance instruction are consistent and simpler to ex- to calibrate their own observations and experiences, which plain, making them more suitable for advertising campaigns will impact their future forecast expectations. If a low rip and signage (Bradstreet et al., 2014). risk forecast is issued and the rips are prevalent and strong, While there is still insufficient evidence to suggest that then beach users may lose faith in forecast accuracy. Simi- present warning systems help people avoid and escape rip larly, if a high rip risk forecast is issued and no rips are ob- currents (see also Lapinski et al., 2014), there is evidence that served with relatively calm conditions, then beach users may lifeguards are effective at preventing drowning death through become complacent about the hazard and discount or ignore preventive actions and rescues. With proper training and ex- future forecasts in the future. However, results of this study perience a lifeguard can provide invaluable local understand- suggest that given time and experience at the beach over a ing of the rip hazard to provide effective mitigation. Unfor- range of conditions, beach users can develop a nuanced un- tunately, there is no consensus amongst beach users that it is derstanding of the forecast and gain greater confidence that safe (or not) to swim in the surf after lifeguards are off duty it is appropriate. Rip forecast inaccuracies appear to be most (Petrass and Blitvich, 2014), despite evidence that it is safer problematic for infrequent beach users who also do not ap- to swim in the presence of a lifeguard. In this respect, greater pear to seek out lifeguards and are unable to spot rips cor- focus should be placed on reminding beach users to swim rectly. near lifeguards and only at times that lifeguards are present Most respondents could clearly state what the standard- because “the chances of drowning at a beach protected by ized rip current sign was informing them to do in terms of lifeguards trained under USLA standards is less than 1 in 18 swimming parallel to the beach to escape the rip, but many million” (Branche et al., 2001). identified a need to provide information that would allow beach users to identify a rip current in general (e.g., “Pic- tures showing what actual rip currents look like would be 5 Conclusions useful”) or specific to the local beach (e.g., “Picture of rip at actual beach [the sign] is placed on”). However, evidence A survey about the extent of public rip current knowledge in from beach surveys in Florida and Texas suggest that beach the United States was conducted with the aim of establish- users are not able to accurately identify a rip current (Cald- ing a dataset that provides guidance for the improvement and well et al., 2012; Brannstrom et al., 2014), although there enhancement of existing beach safety interventions. Results may be ways in which the sign can be made more accurate suggest that the US-based Break the Grip of the Rip!® cam- through small revisions to the perspective, colors, and beach paign has been successful in helping inform the public about morphology (Brannstrom et al., 2015). While local informa- rip current safety. Although few respondents were familiar tion may improve the accuracy and interpretation of the sign, with the campaign itself, most respondents could provide an there is the potential for different signs and messaging be- accurate description of how to escape a rip current by swim- ing used (of varying quality and detail), leading to confu- ming parallel and/or floating until the current weakened. Re- sion and misinterpretation by beach users. A more appropri- sults suggest that the most at-risk population are infrequent ate strategy may be to take a more local approach to risk beach users because they do not seek out lifeguards, do not and emergency management including local emergency con- take the same precautions as frequent beach users, and be- tact information. This approach places greater authority in lieve there are large discrepancies between rip forecasts and local managers and emergency responders, without resulting their own observations at the beach. Survey results provide in different signs. a conservative estimate of 10 % of US beachgoers being at A local approach also includes putting greater emphasis on risk of being caught in a rip due to ignorance and/or poor the expertise of lifeguards to prevent accidents and respond swimming choices. Future education efforts should attempt to emergencies promptly and properly. This would also par- to target this beach-going demographic group. Knowledge tially consider the fact that there are different types of rip of rips, visual ability to accurately identify a safe swimming currents and associated behavior in different geographic lo- location in where rip currents are present, and ability to inter- cations and regions (Castelle et al., 2016b). Of note, Surf pret rip forecasts are each dependent on prior experience with Life Saving Australia has recently adopted a “combined ap- rips and the frequency of beach visitation. In addition to con- proach” to promoting how to escape a rip current (Bradstreet cerns about the spatial and temporal accuracy of public rip et al., 2014). This decision was largely based on field tests of forecasts, many respondents identified a lack of local detail in www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 1016 C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program the rip current warning sign as a concern, with more than half Data availability. This study was approved by the relevant human of respondents suggesting the sign needed to provide a more subject protection program from Texas A&M University (IRB2015- accurate depiction and/or description of a rip current and lo- 0330D). While the identity of the participant cannot readily be de- cal emergency information. This suggests a need for greater termined by the investigator and the identity of the participant is focus on locally specific and verified rip forecasts and sig- not connected to information gathered, the approval requires that nage in coordination with lifeguards, but not at the expense the records of this study will be kept private and stored securely for 3 years before being destroyed. of the successful Break the Grip of the Rip!® campaign.

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program 1017

Appendix A

Table A1. Survey instrument.

Question Response Are you a resident of the United States? Yes/no If resident – in what state do you currently re- List of US states side? If resident – what is your zip code? Open response If not resident – in which country do you reside? List of countries Which best describes your gender? Male/female/no response

What is your age?  18–20 years  21–30 years  31–40 years  41–50 years  51–60 years  61–64 years  65 years and over Which statement about beach visitation best de-  Infrequently (fewer than 10 times in my life) scribes your experience?  Once every year typically on vacation  I go multiple times per year  Several times per month  Frequently (weekly or daily) How would you describe the beaches that you  Calm with small to no waves commonly visit?  Occasional wave activity, primarily during storms  Regular wave activity but typically small- or medium-sized waves  Strong waves are common What is the main type of activity you do when  Swimming and wading you go to the beach?  Board riding (including surfboard, boogie board, stand up, etc.)  Beach activities only (sunbathing, shell collecting, etc.)  Snorkeling or diving  Other If other selected – describe what you tend to do Open response at the beach. Have you ever had swimming lessons or train- Yes/no ing, either in a pool or ocean?

How would you rate your pool swimming abil-  Unable to swim ity?  Weak swimmer  Competent swimmer  Highly competent swimmer How far do you think you can swim in a pool  I can’t swim before you have to stop/pause?  Less than 25 yards (one length of a typical community swimming pool)  More that 25 yards but less than 100 yards  More than 100 yards but less than 500 yards  More than 500 yards How would you rate your swimming ability in  I have never swum in water with lots of waves open water with waves (like an ocean or lake)?  Weak swimmer  Competent swimmer  Highly competent swimmer

www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 1018 C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program

Table A1. Continued.

Question Response

How far do you think you can swim in open wa-  Less than 25 yards ter with waves before you have to stop/pause?  More than 25 yards but less than 100 yards  More than 100 yards but less than 500 yards  More than 500 yards  I can’t swim Have you ever swum in an open ocean or lake  Yes with lots of wave breaking?  No  Unsure What is the most important factor for you when  Safety (e.g., are not prone to theft) choosing an ocean or lake beach to visit, with  Safety in the water (avoid dangerous water hazards) the intention of going into the water?  Lifeguard presence  Cleanliness of the beach and water  Crowds (prefer to be on a popular beach)  Crowds (prefer to be on a secluded, private or empty beach)  Ease of access  Avoid lots of breaking waves (i.e., prefer calm conditions)  Prefer lots of breaking waves  Other You answered “other” to the previous questions. Open response Please describe the most important factor for you when choosing an ocean or lake beach to visit.

When you go to the beach, how important is it  Not important to you to swim near a lifeguard?  Important  Very important If you visit a beach with no lifeguards, do you  Always still go into the water to wade, swim, or float?  Most of the time  Sometimes  Rarely  Never Do you think about or check for hazards when  Always you go to the beach?  Most of the time  Sometimes  Rarely  Never What do you think is the most dangerous hazard  Jellyfish when you swim, wade, or float at the beach?  Sharks  Big waves  Shore breaks  Undertow  Alongshore currents  Rip currents  Surfboards/boogie boards/other swimmers  Sunburn  Other You answered “other” to the previous question. Open response Please identify what you think is the most dan- gerous hazard at the beach.

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program 1019

Table A1. Continued.

Question Response

Have you ever seen or heard information about  Never beach hazards. Please select all that apply.  Yes, in primary school  Yes, in high school  Yes, at university/college  Yes, from my parents  Yes, through pamphlets and brochures  Yes, through warning signs on the beach  Yes, on the Internet  Yes, on television  Yes, on the radio  Yes, at my rental property in the guide material  Other You answered “other” to the previous question. Open response Please describe where you have heard about beach hazards. Are you familiar with any beach safety flag sys- Yes/no tem in the United States? You answered “yes” to the previous question. Open response Can you describe what you know about the beach safety flag system in the United States?

Have you heard of rip currents?  Yes  No Can you describe a rip current? Open response

Where have you learned/heard about rip cur-  I have never heard of a rip current rents? Select all that apply.  Television  Magazine/book  Radio  Primary school  High school  College/university  Parents  Pamphlets and/or brochures  Internet  Beach signs  Lifeguard  I have been caught in one (direct experience)  Other You answered “other” to the previous question. Open response Please tell us where you have heard about rip currents.

If you were at a beach, would you know how to  Yes, always spot a rip current?  Yes, sometimes  No  You can’t see a rip current  Unsure You answered “yes” to the previous question. Open response Can you describe what a rip current looks like?

www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 1020 C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program

Table A1. Continued.

Question Response

Where on this photograph would you feel most safe to enter the water? Click on the picture at the spot along the beach that you believe is the safest.

Where on this photograph would you feel most safe to enter the water? Click on the picture at the spot along the beach that you believe is the safest.

Where on this photograph would you feel most safe to enter the water? Click on the picture at the spot along the beach that you believe is the safest.

Explain what you should do if caught in a rip Open response current?

Have you ever been caught in a rip current?  Yes, I was caught in a rip by accident  Yes, I used the rip on purpose (e.g., for surfing)  No  Not sure You answered that you had been caught in a Open response rip current. Where (ie. what beach) were you caught in a rip current?

You answered that you were caught in a rip cur-  Self-escaped by swimming parallel to the beach first, then back to the beach rent by accident. How did you get out of the rip  Self-escaped by swimming straight back to the beach current the first time this happened to you?  Self-escaped by just floating  Rescued by lifeguard  Rescued by bystander (e.g., family, friend, stranger, surfer)  Don’t know/can’t remember Before going to the beach, do you get informa-  Yes tion on the beach and surf conditions for the  No day?

You answered “yes” to the previous question.  Radio What source do you use to get information on  Television the beach and surf conditions for the day? Select  Internet all that apply.  Facebook or other social media  Acquaintance  Other You answered “other” to the previous question. Open response Please explain the other source of information about beach and surf conditions that you use.

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program 1021

Table A1. Continued.

Question Response

Does this information tend to affect your behav-  It doesn’t affect my behavior ior when you go to the beach?  It affects my behavior Please explain how it affects your behavior at Open response the beach. Rank the following sources of information from ______Radio “most trusted” (1) to “least trusted” (5). ______Television ______Internet ______Facebook or other social media ______Acquaintance Please explain why you trust one source of in- Open response formation more than another.

Have you ever seen beach safety information at  Yes the entrance to, or on beaches, that you have vis-  No ited?

What type of beach safety information do you  Signs/posters remember seeing?  Flags  Pamphlets/brochures  Other You answered “other” to the previous question. Open response Please explain the type of beach safety infor- mation that you tend to see at the entrance to the beach.

Where do you tend to see the beach safety in-  At the entrance to the beach formation?  On the beach  Both on the beach and at the entrance to the beach What is the primary message of the safety in- Open response formation that you tend to see?

Have you ever heard of the national United  Yes States rip current education campaign called  No Break the Grip of the Rip!®?

You answered “yes” to the previous question.  Radio Please tell us where you heard or have seen in-  Television formation related to the Break the Grip of the  Newspaper ® Rip! campaign. Select all that apply  Magazine/book  Local magazine or newspaper during my stay  Brochure/pamphlet  At my rental property here  Primary school  High school  College/university  Parents  Internet ®  Break the Grip of the Rip! website  YouTube or other Internet video site  Facebook  Twitter  Other social media  Signs at the entrance to a beach  Signs on the beach  Lifeguards  Other www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 1022 C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program

Table A1. Continued.

Question Response What do you think Break the Grip of the Rip!® Open response means? What does this sign tell you to do if caught in a Open response rip current?

If you see this sign at a beach, how would it  Yes change your behavior at the beach?  No Does this sign help you identify a rip current? Open response You answered “yes” to the previous question. Open response How does it help you identify a rip current? What other information would be useful to be Open response included in the Break the Grip of the Rip!® sign?

Have you ever seen or heard rip current fore-  Radio casts from the following sources? Select all that  Newspaper apply.  Television  Internet  Social media  No Do you understand what it means if there is a  Yes “high risk” for rip currents?  No You answered “yes” to the previous question. Open response What does a high risk of rip currents mean?

Do you understand what it means if there is a  Yes “low risk” for rip currents?  No You answered “yes” to the previous question. Open response What does a low risk of rip currents mean? Do you adjust your activities at the beach based Open response on the rip forecast?

If you heard a rip current forecast (e.g., low risk  Yes or high risk) and went to the beach on the same  No day, did the forecast match the conditions that you encountered at the beach? You answered “no” to the previous question. Open response How did the conditions that you encountered differ from the conditions that you experienced at the beach?

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program 1023

Competing interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict Caldwell, N., Houser, C., and Meyer-Arendt, K.: Ability of beach of interest. users to identify rip currents at Pensacola Beach, Florida, Nat. Hazards, 68, 1041–1056, 2013. Edited by: Vassiliki Kotroni Carey, W. and Rogers, S.: Rip currents: coordinating coastal re- Reviewed by: Robin Davidson-Arnott and Olga Petrucci search, outreach and forecast methodologies to improve public safety, in: Solutions to Coastal Disasters 2005, ASCE, 285–296, 2005. Castelle, B., McCarroll, R. J., Brander, R. W., Scott, T., and Dubar- bier, B.: Modelling the alongshore variability of optimum rip cur- References rent escape strategies on a multiple rip-channelled beach, Nat. Hazards, 81, 664–686, 2016a. Arozarena, I., Houser, C., Echeverria, A. G., and Brannstrom, C.: Castelle, B., Scott, T., Brander, R. W., and McCarroll, R. J.: Rip The rip current hazard in Costa Rica, Nat. Hazards, 77, 753–768, current types, circulation and hazard, Earth-Sci. Rev., 163, 1–21, 2015. 2016b. Arun Kumar, S. V. V. and Prasad, K. V. S. R.: Rip current-related Drozdzewski, D., Shaw, W., Dominey-Howes, D., Brander, R., Wal- fatalities in India: a new predictive risk scale for forecasting rip ton, T., Gero, A., Sherker, S., Goff, J., and Edwick, B.: Surveying currents, Nat. Hazards, 70, 313–335, 2014. rip current survivors: preliminary insights into the experiences of Ashley, W. S. and Black, A. W.: Fatalities associated with noncon- being caught in rip currents, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, vective high-wind events in the United States, J. Appl. Meteorol. 1201–1211, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1201-2012, 2012. Climatol., 47, 717–725, 2008. Drozdzewski, D., Roberts, A., Dominey-Howes, D., and Brander, Barnes, P. H.: Approaches to community safety: risk perception and R.: The experiences of weak and non-swimmers caught in rip social meaning, Aust. J. Emerg. Manag., 1, 15–23, 2002. currents at Australian beaches, Aust. Geogr., 46, 15–32, 2015. Barrett, G. and Houser, C.: Identifying hotspots of rip current ac- Espluga, J., Gamero, N., Prades, A., and Solà, R.: El papel de la tivity using wavelet analysis at Pensacola Beach, Florida, Phys. confianza en los conflictos socio ambientales, Política y sociedad Geogr., 33, 32–49, 2012. 46, 225–273, 2009. Bradstreet, A. J., Brander, R. W., McCarroll, J. R., Brighton, Gensini, V. A. and Ashley, W. S.: An examination of rip current B., Dominey Howes, D., Drozdzewski, D., Sherker, S., Turner, fatalities in the United States, Nat. Hazards, 54, 159–175, 2010. I., Roberts, A., and MacMahan, J.: Rip current survival Green, C. H., Tunstall, S. M., and Fordham, M. H.: The risks principles: Towards consistency, J. Coastal Res., 72, 85–92, from flooding: Which risks and whose perception?, Disasters, 15, https://doi.org/10.2112/SI72-016.1, 2014. 227–236, 1991. Branche, M.: Lifeguard effectiveness: A report of the working Hall, T. E. and Slothower, M.: Cognitive factors affecting home- group, Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, owners’ reactions to defensible space in the Oregon coast range, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2001. Soc. Natur. Resour., 22, 95–110, 2009. Brander, R. W., Bradstreet, A., Sherker, S., and MacMahan, J.: Re- Hartmann, D.: Drowning and Beach-Safety Management (BSM) sponses of swimmers caught in rip currents: perspectives on mit- along the Mediterranean Beaches of Israel – a long-term perspec- igating the global rip current hazard, Int. J. Aquat. Res. Educ., 5, tive, J. Coastal Res., 22, 1505–1514, 2006. 476–482, 2011. Hatfield, J., Williamson, A., Sherker, S., Brander, R., and Hayen, Brander, R., Dominey-Howes, D., Champion, C., Del Vecchio, A.: Development and evaluation of an intervention to reduce rip O., and Brighton, B.: Brief Communication: A new perspec- current related beach drowning, Accident Anal. Prev., 46, 45–51, tive on the Australian rip current hazard, Nat. Hazards Earth 2012. Syst. Sci., 13, 1687–1690, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13- Heitz, C., Spaeter, S., Auzet, A. V., and Glatron, S.: Local stake- 1687-2013, 2013. holders’ perception of muddy flood risk and implications for Brannstrom, C. and Houser, C.: “Riding the rip”: an experiential management approaches: A case study in Alsace (France), Land and integrated human–physical geography curriculum in Costa Use Policy, 26, 443–451, 2009. Rica, J. Geogr. Higher Educ., 39, 527–542, 2015. Houser, C., Caldwell, N., and Meyer-Arendt, K.: Rip Current Haz- Brannstrom, C., Trimble, S., Santos, A., Brown, H. L., and Houser, ards at Pensacola Beach, Florida, Rip currents: beach safety, C.: Perception of the rip current hazard on Galveston Island and physical oceanography, and wave modeling, p. 175, 2011a. North Padre Island, Texas, USA, Nat. Hazards, 72, 1123–1138, Houser, C., Barrett, G., and Labude, D.: Alongshore variation in the 2014. rip current hazard at Pensacola Beach, Florida, Nat. Hazards, 57, Brannstrom, C., Brown, H. L., Houser, C., Trimble, S., and Santos, 501–523, 2011b. A.: “You can’t see them from sitting here”: Evaluating beach user Houser, C., Arnott, R., Ulzhöfer, S., and Barrett, G.: Nearshore Cir- understanding of a rip current warning sign, Appl. Geogr., 56, culation over Transverse Bar and Rip Morphology with Oblique 61–70, 2015. Wave Forcing, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 38, 1269–1279, 2013. Brighton, B., Sherker, S., Brander, R., Thompson, M., and Brad- Houser, C., Murphy, T., and Labude, D.: Alongshore correspon- street, A.: Rip current related drowning deaths and rescues in dence of beach users and rip channels at Pensacola Beach, Australia 2004–2011, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1069– Florida, Nat. Hazards, 78, 2175–2183, 2015. 1075, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1069-2013, 2013. Houser, C., Brander, R., Brannstrom, C., Trimble, S., and Flaherty, Brilly, M. and Polic, M.: Public perception of flood risks, flood fore- J.: Case Study of Rip Current Knowledge amongst Students casting and mitigation, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 345–355, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-345-2005, 2005. www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 1024 C. Houser et al.: Perceptions of a rip current education program

Participating in a Study Abroad Program, Frontiers, 28, 42–60, Ruin, I., Gaillard, J. C., and Lutoff, C.: How to get there? Assessing 2016. motorists’ flash flood risk perception on daily itineraries, Envi- Jóhannesdóttir, G. and Gísladóttir, G.: People living under threat ron. Hazards, 7, 235–244, 2007. of volcanic hazard in southern Iceland: vulnerability and Sabet, B. S. and Barani, Gh. A.: Field investigation of rip currents risk perception, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 407–420, along the southern coast of the Caspian Sea, Sci. Iran. Trans. A, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-407-2010, 2010. 18, 878–884, 2011. Karanci, A. N., Aksit, B., and Dirik, G.: Impact of a community Scolobig, A., De Marchi, B., and Borga, M.: The missing link be- disaster awareness training program in Turkey: Does it influence tween flood risk awareness and preparedness: findings from case hazard-related cognitions and preparedness behaviors, Soc. Be- studies in an Alpine Region, Nat. Hazards, 63, 499–520, 2012. hav. Personal., 33, 243–258, 2005. Sherker, S., Brander, R., Finch, C., and Hatfield, J.: Why Australia Kates, R. W.: Hazard and choice perception in flood plain manage- needs an effective national campaign to reduce coastal drowning, ment. Chicago, Illinois, University of Chicago, 157 pp., 1962. J. Sci. Med. Sport, 11, 81–83, 2008. Klein, A. H., Santana, G. G., Diehl, F. L., and Menezes, J. T.: Anal- Sherker, S., Williamson, A., Hatfield, J., Brander, R., and Hayen, ysis of hazards associated with sea bathing: results of five years A.: Beachgoers’ beliefs and behaviours in relation to beach flags work in oceanic beaches of Santa Catarina State, Southern Brazil, and rip currents, Accident Anal. Prev., 42, 1785–1804, 2010. J. Coastal Res., 35, 107–116, 2003. Short, A. D. and Hogan, C. L.: Rip currents and beach hazards: Lapinski, M. and Viken, G.: Great Lakes Swim Safety Risk Com- their impact on public safety and implications for coastal man- munication for 18–24 year-old Males: Review of Key Literature agement, J. Coastal Res., 12, 197–209, 1994. and Results of a Focus Group Study Final Report, 2014. Siegrist, M. and Gutscher, H.: Flooding risks: A comparison of lay Lushine, J. B.: A study of rip current drownings and related weather people’s perceptions and expert’s assessments in Switzerland, factors, Natl. Weather Digest, 1991. Risk Anal., 26, 971–979, 2006. Matthews, B., Andronaco, R., and Adams, A.: Warning signs at Siegrist, M. and Cvetkovich, G.: Perception of hazards: The role of beaches: Do they work?, Safety Sci., 62, 312–318, 2014. social trust and knowledge, Risk Anal., 20, 713–720, 2000. McCarroll, R. J., Brander, R. W, MacMahan, J. H., Turner, I. L., Terpstra, T., Lindell, M. K., and Gutteling, J. M.: Does Communi- Reniers, A. J. H. M, Brown, J., Bradstreet, A., and Sherker, S.: cating (Flood) Risk Affect (Flood) Risk Perceptions? Results of Evaluation of swimmer-based rip current escape strategies, Nat. a Quasi-Experimental Study, Risk Anal., 29, 1141–1155, 2009. Hazards, 71, 1821–1846, 2014. Terpstra, T.: Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: Affective and cog- McCarroll, R. J., Castelle, B., Brander, R. W., and Scott, T.: Mod- nitive routes to flood preparedness behavior, Risk Anal., 31, elling rip current flow and bather escape strategies across a trans- 1658–1675, 2011. verse bar and rip channel morphology, Geomorphology, 246, Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: Availability: A heuristic for judging 502–518, 2015. frequency and probability, Cognitive Psychol., 5, 207–232, 1973. Mileti, D. S. and O’Brien, P.: Public response to aftershock warn- Van Leeuwen, McCarroll, J. R., Brander, R. W., Turner, I. L., Power, ings, US geological survey professional paper, 1553, 31–42, H., and Bradstreet, A.: Examining rip current escape strategies in 1993. non-traditional beach morphologies, Nat. Hazards, 81, 145–165, Morgan, D., Ozanne-Smith, J., and Triggs, T.: Self-reported water 2016. and drowning risk exposure at surf beaches, Aust. Nz. J. Publ. Williamson, A., Hatfield, J., Sherker, S., Brander, R., and Hayen, Heal., 33, 180–188, 2009. A.: A comparison of attitudes and knowledge of beach safety Njome, M. S., Suh, C. E., Chuyong, G., and de Wit, M. J.: Volcanic in Australia for beachgoers, rural residents and international risk perception in rural communities along the slopes of mount tourists, Aust. Nz. J. Publ. Heal., 36, 385–391, 2012. Cameroon, West-Central Africa, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 58, 608–622, Woodward, E., Beaumont, E., Russell, P., Wooler, A., and Macleod, 2010. R.: Analysis of rip current incidents and victim demographics in NOAA: The NOAA coastal hazards resilience workshop: Rip cur- the UK, J. Coastal Res., 65, 850–855, 2013. rents and wave runup, Virginia Modeling, Analysis, and Simula- tion Center, Suffolk, Virginia, 14-16 April, 2015. Petrass, L. A. and Blitvich, J. D.: Preventing adolescent drowning: Understanding water safety knowledge, attitudes and swimming ability. The effect of a short water safety intervention, Accident. Anal. Prev., 70, 188–194, 2014.

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1003–1024, 2017 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1003/2017/ United States Lifesaving Association Medical Advisor Activity Report

Date: April 25, 2018 Officer: Peter G. Wernicki, M.D., FACOS

Introduction

I have been an officer in this organization for almost 30 years. I believe that we are at a crossroads in how we function. I see a concerning increase in regionalization in our relations. I would ask that we all take a step back and review our goals – the betterment of the USLA and its mission. Hopefully we can work on these ideals at our upcoming meeting. I have heard from many of the USLA members who attended the World Congress on Drowning Prevention in Vancouver. They were impressed with the overall experience. They enjoyed the opportunity to explore hundreds of educational presentations. They also had the ability to expand their contacts with ILS members and to other lifesaving individuals throughout the world community. This exposure can only progress the goals of the USLA.

Activities and Accomplishments

1. The Medical Advisor and Medical Committee have been relatively quiet over the last several months. We do not anticipate a Medical Committee meeting in Long Beach. If anyone has any issues that we need to address please contact me so your concerns can be addressed. 2. The members of the Medical Committee have helped with medical articles that you will be seeing in upcoming American Lifeguard articles. 3. The members of the Medical Committee continue to carry out our other assignments in the USLA and ILS. I continue to work as the Chair of the ILS Medical Committee – including chairing the successful ILS Medical Committee and Medical theme in Vancouver. I also continue as the Medical representative to the ILS Anti-doping committee which is aligned with WADA. Dr. Mike Barrows continues in his role as coach/manager of the USLA competition team. Adrienne Groh - Chair of Heroic Acts Awards continues her excellent work. Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration

1. None

Page 1 of 1 USLA LEGAL ADVISOR ACTIVITY REPORT SPRING, 2018, BOD MEETING

 Review and discuss full proposal for New Jersey/USLA Certification merger

 Review phone conferences and discussions of USLA By-laws and P&P’s regarding Executive Committee and Board of Directors proxy voting

 Receipt and review of all preliminary Prone 2 Paddle contract information

 Review sample IRS policies for o Conflict of Interest o Whistle Blower o Document Retention All policies incorporated under Form 990, Part VI – Governance, Management, and Disclosure

 Review of proposed USLA policy for equitable distribution per region for assigned bar stools during happy hour events

HAVE A PRODUCTIVE AND ENJOYABLE MEETING! United States Lifesaving Association Great Lakes Region Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 President: Joe Pecoraro The Great Lakes Region would like to thank our hosts here in Long Beach for organizing this meeting. Adam Abajian attended the Great Lakes Drowning Symposium and spoke with several people from Duluth, MN about forming a USLA Chapter for Lake Superior. The Missouri-Gateway Chapter held their January meeting to discuss member involvement and trying to engage members in more than just social events.

United States Lifesaving Association Mid-Atlantic Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 President: Ed Zebrowski

Introduction

Sincere thanks to the Southwest Region and all who assisted in making this possible.

Activities, Accomplishments and Information (Since prior Board of Directors Meeting)

1. Winter meeting held in Cape May, NJ. Election of the New Board,Ed Zebrowski, President; Tom Perry, Vice President; Rich Savitich, Treasurer; Dave Foxwell, Secretary; Buzz Mogck, Executive Delegate; Ed Zebrowski III, First Delegate, Denise Blair, Second Delegate and Gene Hession, Third Delegate. Reviewed submissions from 3 prospective new chapters. Sites chosen for our 2018 Regional competitions. 2. Spring meeting held in Avon, NJ. Lengthy discussion held on the state of the National USLA on what needs to be done Regionally and Nationally in order to move the organization forward. Plans made for Beach Safety Week to involve the entire Region. The Region will be purchasing additional coloring books for Beach Safety Week and other events. As a result of the post season drownings and numerous rescues throughout the Region a committee was formed to develop some policies, procedures and protocols that communities may implement in an effort to avoid the disaster that was 2017. When lifeguards are not on duty it leads to miscommunication, buck passing and often placing the responsibility for water rescues on ill prepared and untrained people.

Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration

1. Would like for the Board of Directors to consider having the National meetings organized and staged by the Board instead of placing the onus on the Regions.

Page 1 of 1 United States Lifesaving Association New England Activity Report

Date: 4/7/2018 President: W. James Farrell III

Activities, Accomplishments and Information (Since prior Board of Directors Meeting)

1. New Officers as of January 1, 2018 for two-year term. 2. President- W. James Farrell III (Rhode Island), Treasure-Robert Bertrand (Mass.) 3. Site visits planned for all USLA New England Beaches. 4. Open Water Lifeguard Management Seminar University of Rhode Island May 12. 5. Red Cross Lifeguard recertification and Instructor in the water 2017 update Newport County YMCA May 13.

Page 1 of 1 United States Lifesaving Association Northwest Region

Activity Report Date: April 26, 2018 Officer: Cathy VonWald Introduction:

Thank you to the Southwest Region for hosting this meeting.

Kyle Maxwell has expressed to the Region that he is committed to the USLA and representing our Region. After some discussion, Kyle has stepped down as our Regional President. The Northwest Region wants to express that we are 100 percent in support of Kyle in his newly elected position as USLA National Executive Delegate.

The Northwest Region has been busily preparing for the summer 2018 season. A wetter and more normal weather pattern has returned to most areas of the northwest this winter and we look forward to improved environmental conditions at our freshwater beaches this summer.

There are numerous public education outreach efforts and programs related to water safety that continue growing in the Pacific Northwest. The East Bay Chapter continues its expansion of the “Vamos a Aprender” program this summer season with a goal of reaching over 1,000 participants. Sonoma County Regional Parks will be embarking upon its 5th summer season providing water safety patrols along the Russian River and 13th season sponsoring the “Vamos a Nadar” water safety program that has provided over 3,000 low cost swim lessons for youth. Additionally, lifejacket loaner programs continue to expand along freshwater beaches and river access points in the San Francisco bay area.

The Norwest Region and associated Chapters continue to remain focused on adapting our public education and outreach strategies to be inclusive, multilingual and adaptable based on the unique characteristics of open water beaches we lifeguard and other beach environments without lifeguard services. Activities and Accomplishments: (Since Prior Board Meeting)

1. The Redwood Coast Chapter nominated and the East Bay Chapter has seconded Cathy VonWald, to replace Kyle Maxwell as the PNWUSLA Regional President. Cathy accepted the nomination and was elected. 2. Congratulations to Cathy VonWald on her retirement for the City of Bellevue. 3. The NW Region Lifeguard Championships is Scheduled for July 25, 2018, the venue will be Sand Harbor, Lake Tahoe.

United States Lifesaving Association Pacific Islands Region Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Prepared by: D. Kalani Vierra

Activities, Accomplishments and Information (Since prior Board of Directors Meeting)

1. A NEW lifeguard tower will be installed at the Poipu Beach Park on Kauai. Blessing and opening ceremony are scheduled on May 1, 2018. Creating more coverage with two towers at this increasing popular location. 2. The Kauai Lifeguard Association continues to support the ocean safety efforts on Kauai. By donating over $500,000 worth of lifesaving equipment and to the education programs in the last 5 years. 3. A total of 5 Ocean Safety Officers have passed the EMT training course in Kauai County. Goal is to have all the rescue craft roving patrol operators EMT certified by 2020. 4. HGEA Bargaining Unit #14 awaits arbitration award acknowledgement. 5. Maui County had a rough start in 2018, 17 ocean related drownings in the first 3 months of the year.

6. Fire Battalion Chief Colin Yamamoto has retired from Maui County and Fire Battalion Chief Kevin McAfee is now in charge of Ocean Safety.

7. A snorkeling workshop was conducted on Oahu. Rental companies, resorts, manufactures, and physicians all participated in this workshop. Due to snorkeling being the leading cause of death to visitors. 8. City & County of Honolulu created 2 new roving rescue teams. 9. C&C approved to hire 2 new Lieutenant Positions, 1 captain position, 4 full- time positions for the Hanauma Bay operations. Creating a new district and a pilot 4-10hr shifts to increase coverage. 10. Hawaii County had 3 OSOs who received awards from the Daniel Sayre Foundation who were recognized for their outstanding duties, John Kapsky, Robin Fasciano, and Paul Tucker.

11. Hawaii County received some new equipment that was donated by the Karakin Foundation through the Sayre Foundation, including 5 new state of the art rescue boards and 2 Polaris Ranger UTVs for Hapuna beach and Isaac Hale beach

12. Each Island struggles with manpower concerns due to vacancies, retirements, and industrial injuries.

Page 1 of 1 United States Lifesaving Association South Atlantic Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 President: Mike Wagner

Introduction

Thank you to the Southwest Region for hosting us in Long Beach.

The SALA met in January Hilton Head, South Carolina for the annual Winter Meeting and Education Session. We had more than 40 members in attendance. George Burgess, the curator of the International Shark Attack File gave a presentation presented to our region as the education portion of our meeting. The presentation along with the question and answer session were extremely informative. The USLA’s PIO Tom Gill took copious note if anyone is interested in learning more. We have established a good report with Professor Burgess and his assistant, Lindsay French. They would be very interested in presenting their research to the at the USLA’s Educational Conference in the future.

During our meeting, we discussed the reports from attendees of the November meeting in Vancouver. We also elected our leadership for the next two years. There was a great deal of change on our board, as Tom Gill and Ralph Wagner chose not to run as President and Vice President respectively. Both had served in those roles for 10 years, and we thank them both for their outstanding service to our region and the USLA. I was elected President, Chad Motz was elected Vice President, Monty Reed was elected the new Treasurer replacing me, and Adrienne Groh held her spot as Secretary. Duke Brown was reappointed Executive Delegate, Chad Motz and Gary Felch will continue as Competition Chairs and last but not least, Tom Gill was elected as the new Advisor replacing Nikki Bowie. As the departing President, Tom Gill gave the “President’s Award” to several members of our region for their leadership and sportsmanship throughout his tenure. I respectfully submit this report and look forward to working with membership from all regions in Long Beach.

Activities, Accomplishments and Information (Since prior Board of Directors Meeting)

1. Held SALA Winter Educational Conference and Board meeting in Hilton Head. 2. The 2018 and summer meeting will be hosted by Nags Head, Noth Carolina. Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration

1. None.

Page 1 of 1 United States Lifesaving Association Southeast Region Officer Activity Report

Date: April 19, 2018

Name / Office: Gerry Falconer, SER President

“It is in our hands to join our strength, taking sustenance from our diversity, honouring our rich and varied traditions and culture but acting together for the protection and benefit of us all” Kwame Nkrumah

The SER would like to thank the SW Region for hosting the Spring 2018 National BOD meeting. We look forward to clearing up several issues that have occurred since the meeting in the Fall. We look forward to a successful & productive meeting to ensure the progress of this association.

Activities, Accomplishments, and Information:

 SER ISSUES:  The FPBCA and USLA-SER met together during the NDPA Educational Conference in Tampa. The duality of meeting gave both associations the chance to exchange lifesaving information.  The COQUINA CUP will be hosted by Flagler County May 17-19, 2018. This is a new and exciting event on the SER calendar. Plan to register!  The James “MAC’ McCarthy Memorial SER Surf Lifesaving Championships are scheduled for July 25 & 26, 2018 for the professionals and July 28, 2018 for the Junior LGs hosted by Flagler Beach. Registration will be online. Early registration is highly encouraged!!! Check the USLA-SER website and the SER FACEBOOK page.  The FBPCA/SER awards banquet was hosted by FBPCA BEACH PATROL of the YEAR Manatee County. Annually a great event to get together to honor Florida’s lifesaving best! Congratulations to Alex O’Connor, Ft. Lauderdale, LIFEGUARD of the YEAR.

 NATIONAL ISSUES:  The USLA National Lifeguard Championships are scheduled for Virginia Beach, VA August 8- 11, 2018. Current plans are for VA Beach to host the competition for 2yrs. Hopefully, further information can be disseminated as to the contract in place.  There are several issues that have occurred over the last several months with the USLA National Executive Committee voting that needs to be discussed in length.

Goals and Objectives:  Membership in the SER has surpassed the 801 mark that with 847 members that entitles the SER to the max of 7 delegate votes at National meeting. We will continue to have a strong voice on all issues at the national level by supporting & increasing SER membership.  The SER looks forward to hosting the 2018 Fall National BOD meeting in Delray Beach, FL.

Page 1 of 2 Recommendations for Board Consideration:

 Review of USLA Bylaws and Policies & Procedures

Page 2 of 2 United States Lifesaving Association Southwest Region Activity Report

Date: April 25, 2018 President: Bill Humphreys

Introduction On behalf of the Southwest Region (SWR), welcome to Southern California. Our region is excited and honored to be able to host this important meeting. Special thanks to your Vice-President, Mike Beuerlein, for organizing the meeting. We also want to thank the meeting sponsors and vendors, the City of Long Beach, and the Long Beach lifeguard and lifeguard alumni associations for their assistance. Finally, thank you to Kay Smiley for her assistance as we prepared for the meeting.

Activities, Accomplishments, and Information 1. January brought changes to the SWR’s Executive Board. Kai Bond, Rob Williams, and Rob McGowan who had over 50 combined years of service on our executive board voluntarily stepped down. They will be missed but we have some excellent new members who are here with us today: Bryan Etnyre, Mark Allen, and Jim Hughes. We are fortunate to have such talented members willing to step up. Please take some time during our social gatherings to welcome and get to know them. 2. Two weeks ago we held our Regional Board of Director’s meeting in nearby Playa Del Ray. The two day meeting was well attended with over 30 chapters represented. At the meeting, we were able to award 8 Medals of Valor, 4 Heroic Act awards, and 1 Meritorious Act award on behalf of the USLA and the SW Region. The USLA award recipients were not able to attend today’s meeting, however, 2 additional Medals of Valor and 1 Heroic Act Award will be presented here today. It was an honor to be part of this important recognition of fellow lifesavers who are so deserving. Thank you to the USLA for continuing to support this important function. 3. SWR members continue to be actively involved in the California Marine Safety Chief’s Association. As a chapter based organization, partnerships such as this are one way we can help improve the coordination between our region and agencies. To help further this, we’ve created an Agency Liaison position which will provide updates from the region to a representative from each agency. Likewise, the agencies will be able to send information through the liaison to our region for consideration by the SWR or the USLA, as appropriate. 4. Partnerships with the John Wayne Cancer Foundation and Project Wipeout are continuing - supporting lifesaving efforts in general, the importance of sun protection, and spinal injury prevention. Both of these organizations have been wonderful supporters of lifesaving and public education in our region. 5. Next month our region will host the first “train the trainer” emergency personal watercraft class which came out of USLA Certification Committee as a USLA certified course. Thank you to everyone who has worked so hard bring this concept to reality.

Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration 1. The California Marine Safety Chief’s Association would like to request that the USLA consider a vehicle training certification program, similar to the PWC course, as one of their next projects.

Respectfully submitted, Bill Humphreys

Page 1 of 1 United States Lifesaving Association Executive Director

Activity Report

Date: April 9, 2018 Officer: Kay Smiley Introduction:

I’ve felt an increase momentum around the USLA over the last six months. I realized the energy was building after receiving numerous compliments from agencies saying they like the direction the USLA is going. We continue to receive kudos on the new Open Water Lifesaving Manual and USLA Instructor Materials. Agencies appreciate the attention to detail with the Lifeguard Agency Certification Program, and are thrilled to learn we have Open Water Lifeguard and ARRT course completion cards available to purchase. They are excited about the upcoming improvements to USLA statistics system and look forward to enriched and expanded educational conferences. Some of my favorite quotes are “It’s like a breath of fresh air”, “It’s nice to know the USLA family cares”, and “I really like the direction the USLA is headed.” This is the momentum I feel each day when I speak to Lifeguard Chiefs, Training Officers and USLA members. Everyone is working together on the strategic plan elements. Lifeguards and agencies proudly tell me about expanding their public education programs and growing their Junior Lifeguard programs. Preventive lifeguarding is working, as shown when agencies call to share facts about their annual statistics. Last week an agency called to report a ratio of 100 preventive actions to only one rescue. USLA volunteers make a difference every day. Examples include Certification Officers who help get new agencies started, volunteers who enthusiastically plan for Board of Directors meetings, and dedicated souls who are planning for this summer’s Lifeguard Championship. I am proud to support the mission of the USLA, overseeing day-to-day operations and working to raise the organization's profile. A highlight of my job is working with the various members, volunteers, committees, and agencies. I coordinate with many board members to keep projects moving forward between Directors meetings and help the momentum continue to grow. Below is a list of the main projects I have worked on in the last six months. A large portion of my work since the fall meeting has focused on assisting agencies to update their policy manuals and help them through the USLA Lifeguard Agency Certification Program process.

1. Agency Master List – Continue to update with USLA agency contact information. 2. American Lifeguard Magazine – Invoiced & collected payments from companies advertising in the American Lifeguard magazine and coordinated payments with Chris Brewster (Magazine Editor) and Michael Bradley (Treasurer). 3. American Safety and Health Institute (ASHI) – Continue to promote the USLA partnership with ASHI. I work with Corey Abraham (Senior Account Manager) on USLA reports ensuring accurate participation and sales records. 4. Annual Fundraising Campaign – Developed materials and broad outline for the annual campaign. Working with Jim McCray (Fundraising Chair) to prepare for the first official Fundraising Committee meeting. 5. Annual Report – Continue to gather data, information, and reports for the Annual Report. 6. Brand Agreements – Updated files and notified Peter Davis (President) and Michael Bradley (Treasurer) of upcoming contract expiration dates and scheduled payments. 7. Certifications Program - Collected 100% of the fall certification fees. Worked closely with agencies to prepare their applications before presenting to Chris Brewster (Certification Chair) and Certification Officers for approval. Assisted 31 agencies (five new agencies) with the application process. 8. Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) – Completed 2018 CFC application so we can continue to receive donations from government employees. 9. Contact Forms – Contacted individuals, answered questions, and solved membership problems. 10. Course Completion Cards – Processed orders, verified training with training officers, and answered questions from Lifeguard agencies & ARRT agencies. 11. Fall Meeting Follow Up - Sent thank you notes and tax letters to exhibitors from the Fall Board of Directors meeting. 12. Instructor Materials for Open Water Lifesaving Manual – Continue to answer questions, verify lead trainers, and process requests. 13. Member Communication – Answer phone calls and emails from members & certified agencies. Assist with website inquires. 14. Project List – Each month I submit a report to Peter Davis (President) showing progress on projects and communicating successes & issues. 15. QuickBooks – Continue to work with Michael Bradley (Treasurer) to create systems and invoices with QuickBooks. 16. RFP – Worked with Michael Bradley (Treasurer) to create an RFP for the Hilton Hotels to request bids from Palm Beach and Jupiter area hotels to host the Fall Board of Directors meeting and Educational Conference. 17. Special Projects – Completed special projects for the Peter Davis (President). 18. Statistics – Worked with Rick Gould (Statistics Collection & Reporting Chair) regarding updating the statistics website. Met with Rick Gould and the prospective company to discuss needs and features. Sent reminders and contacted agencies who have not submitted the annual statistics.

United States Lifesaving Association Fundraising and Sponsorship Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Officer: Ed Zebrowski

Activities and Accomplishments (Since Prior Board of Directors Meeting. Include information on how the committee is promoting the Water Safety USA message)

1. Finalized the contract for sponsorship with P2P. 2. Worked with Hobie on the buffs for the membership kit. The design of the buff was provided to the membership to share. 3. Attempting to finalize a contract with Engine for review. While the deal does not include any monetary payments, it is very valuable to us. Last year and for the next three years they will be outfitting our National Team, our officials and providing the rash guards for the National Championships at cost. This has a minimum value of $25,000.00 per year 4. Have been in discussions with numerous possible sponsors for both the Nationals and USLA. 5. Discussions with our Public Relations firm (BZA) on the Nationals and potential sponsors. 6. In negotiations for television and live streaming of this year’s Nationals. 7. Collaborated with Tom Gill on reaching an agreement with Jersey Mike’s for Title sponsorship of the 2018 Nationals and items for inclusion in our membership kit. 8. Working with Virginia Beach on the Nationals sponsorships, media and public relations.

Page 1 of 1 United States Lifesaving Association American Lifeguard Magazine Editor Activity Report

Presentation Date: April 26, 2108 Editor: B. Chris Brewster Introduction

Creating each edition of ALM involves over 125 hours of work. The Editor’s job includes collecting, editing, and writing stories of value to our readers; maintaining good relations with our advertisers; soliciting new advertisers; working with the graphic designer to create an attractive product; working with the mailing house to get the magazine out on time; and working with the Executive Director to ensure collection of advertising revenue. Before publication, the magazine is circulated twice for advance review and input of the Executive Committee. Content: A major goal of the Editor is maintaining a high-quality product. This involves identifying content that might be of value to our members, working with potential contributors to edit their work, and creating additional content (writing). Cost: A major goal of the Editor is to keep the production and mailing cost as low as possible. I am happy to report that the cost to produce ALM has declined substantially since I assumed the Editor job. Prior to that time, from 2012 to 2014, the average net cost to produce ALM (expenses less revenues) was $25,821 per year — an annual cost of about $2.58 per member. The cost was reduced to $15,127 in 2016, and then to $13,342 in 2017. This translates to an annual cost of about $1.34 per member. Recently, competitive bidding resulted in the selection of a new printer. If things go as expected, annual costs should decline to under $9,000 — an annual cost of less than $0.90 per member. This would be a savings of $16,800 per year and a 65% decline in cost since 2104. As a comparison, our total income from sponsorship in 2018 is budgeted at $19,000.

ALM Net Annual Cost $30,000

$25,000

$20,000

$15,000

$10,000

$5,000

$0 2012-2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 (est.) 2019 (est.) (avg.)

ALM Editor Activity Report - Page 1 of 2

Request for Assistance: It is challenging to find appropriate content for ALM. A reminder to all members of the Board of Directors that you are invited to contribute content. ALM will benefit greatly from the following: Heroic Acts — Whenever the USLA issues heroic act awards, especially the Medal of Valor, I ask that the committee create an appropriate article, with photos. Junior Lifeguards — The majority of our readers are junior lifeguards. I ask that the Junior Lifeguard Committee provide appropriate articles. Public Education — This is a key offering of the USLA. I ask that the Public Education Committee submit articles focusing on their most recent activities and initiatives. Sport — It’s helpful to receive at least one story each year on the Nationals, but it would also be helpful to receive stories at other times of the year, including from the national teams. Medical — Articles on the latest advancements in the medical area are of great interest to readers. I ask that the Medical Committee contribute appropriate articles. Other Committees and Assignments — Please realize that a responsibility of all of us is to help inform our members and ALM is a key forum for that information. Please contribute! Activities and Accomplishments (Since prior Board of Directors meeting)

1. Publishing: Edited and mailed winter/spring edition on time (actually a few days early). The summer edition is complete and will be mailed on June 1 as scheduled. 2. Content: Solicited written content from USLA members and other sources. Selected the most appropriate stories and edited each story. Wrote content for the magazine. 3. Budget: Produced the magazine under budget in calendar year 2017. 4. New publisher: Received, reviewed, and accepted a bid from a new publisher that is expected to greatly reduce the cost to produce ALM. Recommendations for Board Consideration

1. Should the winter edition be changed to a spring edition and mail out a bit later (e.g. February 15)? This could help increase advertising revenue as advertisers may be more included to advertise in spring than in winter. Goals

1. Finish 2018 under budget. 2. Achieve 100% collection on advertising payments. 3. Further increase advertising revenue (this is limited by space, since about 50% of the summer edition is advertising). Advertising in the summer edition is 18.5 pages, roughly half the magazine. 4. Continue to mail on time. 5. Exceed Board and member expectations.

ALM Editor Activity Report - Page 2 of 2 United States Lifesaving Association Public Information Officer Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Officer: Tom Gill

Introduction

Thank you to the organizers for hosting us here in Long Beach. Since Vancouver we have seen our typical amount of media requests from around the nation. As we enter the summer I ask that if you are tasked with answering media requests on behalf of the USLA you do your best to promote the USLA in both word and apparel. Make sure you have a USLA shirt nearby and always mention the USLA website when possible. Last, if there is any confusion, the USLA is not based in Virginia Beach.

Activities and Accomplishments (Since Prior Board of Directors Meeting)

1. Advised, redirected or responded on the following. 1.1. Inside Fullerton article (due out soon) 1.2. WCBS Radio 1.3. NJ Advance Media 1.4. Novelist Dylan Landis 1.5. HB Murals Project

Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration

1. Promote the USLA whenever possible.

Page 1 of 1 United States Lifesaving Association National Certification Committee Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Committee Chair: B. Chris Brewster

Introduction

In January I assumed oversight of the committee, which I had first chaired upon its inception in 1992. Much has changed since then, including a much larger number of certified agencies, an online application system, and support from our Executive Director. It has taken some time to get up to speed, but I’d like to thank Vice-Chair Tony Pryor for his support and, of course, Kay Smiley for all her work. Much has been accomplished and there is much to do.

Activities and Accomplishments

1. Issued letters and certificates to agencies approved at fall 2017 Board of Directors meeting. 2. Issued 60 course completion cards in 2017. 3. Maintained 140 certified lifeguard agencies and 14 certified ARRT agencies. 4. Collected 100% of fall certification fees. 5. Sent reminder notices to agencies due for renewal in spring 2018. 6. Reviewed applications, addressed obvious shortcomings, sent to Certification Officers, received reports of findings, filed findings online, and updated status document. 7. Worked with chair of PRWC Working Group to begin the process of transforming approved standards to a program that will allow certification of PRWC training agencies. 8. Worked with USLA Statistician Rick Gould on his proposal to upgrade statistics system.

Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration

1. Approve new and renewing certifications as recommended by the National Certification Committee. 2. Review/approve recommendations arising from National Certification Committee meeting.

Attachments

Please refer to committee agenda for further details, issues for consideration, and a list of agencies proposed for certification.

Page 1 of 1 United States Lifesaving Association Heroic Acts, Awards, Recognition, and Presentation Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Officer: Adrienne Groh

Introduction

The committee would like to send a big thank Kay, Peter, Rob, Peter, and everyone who advocated and planned the meeting in Vancouver. The opportunity to host the USLA BOD meeting in conjunction with the WCDP 2017 was both brilliant and inspiring. The meeting was educational and strenghthened the committee’s commitment to the future success of the association.

Activities and Accomplishments (Since Prior Board of Directors Meeting. Include information on how the committee is promoting the Water Safety USA message)

1. The committee has focused on the expansion of recognition both internally and externally that will include not only surf rescues and acts that involve active recovery, but also to include extraordinary work within and outside of the association. These awards promote the continued conversation of universal water safety by recognizing individuals and groups who promote the mission of drowning prevention. 2. The committee created a subcommittee to create a narrative to submit to ALM for MOV recipients as well as other award recipients. Our previous goal continues to be fostered with a plan to submit stories to Mr Brewster for publication. 3. The committee has continued to work with the website coordinator to not only have a more user and committee friendly on line application for all of the heroic acts, but also have the national awards program application on the website. 4. The committee produced awards and recognitions approved at the Vancouver meeting, and provided agencies with awards for presentations in local communities. 5. The committee discussed the importance for agency and association participation in the National Awards Program. It showcases the hard work of lifeguard associations and promotes the significance of lifeguards in the community to city administrators. The City of San Clemente, CA once again was showcased for their incredible program in their community and will be presented at this meeting. This awards program provides an opportunity to demonstrate the importance of lifesaving in the community and continues to build the foundation for support of lifesaving. 6. The committee also created an award for incremental years of service for officials. Mr. Richardson came up with the amazing design and, the committee, lead by Mr. Healey and Mr. Gavin, will be reaching out to regional presidents and the competition committee to create an accurate list of names. The timing coincides with the 30th anniversary of lifesaving sport and will be presented at the national games in Virginia Beach. 7. The USLA created a new project group to support lifesaving in natural disasters, and the committee has continued to encourage submissions to honor lifeguards and non-lifeguards who risk their lives to help victims of natural disasters.

Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration

1. Review and discuss the incremental awards for national officials. Page 1 of 2 2. Discuss and vote on current submissions for recognition 3. Meet with the website coordinator to promote recognition on social media 4. Discuss awards for AARTcertified agencies

Page 2 of 2 United States Lifesaving Association Junior Guards Activity Report

Date: 4-26-2018 Officer: David Robinson

Activities and Accomplishments (Since Prior Board of Directors Meeting. Include information on how the committee is promoting the Water Safety USA message)

1. We were able to help a number of agencies starting JG programs through access to the Junior Lifeguard online library 2. Added 5 new pieces of curriculum to the JG library

Page 1 of 1 As a lifelong USLA member, past junior lifeguard program coordinator, and a parent of two junior lifeguards, I have found the USLA’s lack of connection with the children disappointing as well as a missed opportunity. The majority of junior lifeguards and their families believe the USLA exists for lifeguard competitions and that the only reason to have a membership is to compete. Agencies that only enroll competitors, not their entire junior lifeguard program, reinforce this reputation. If the cost of the USLA were not included in the junior lifeguard fee, I am confident that Newport Beach would have less than 20 children join. The USLA has to show that there is a benefit to membership.

The first step is to make the membership timely. Junior lifeguard members do not see membership information, cards, magazines, and stickers until late September or October. We have even seen them arrive as late as November. Ideally, promotional and membership materials would be available before the start of the programs, preferably during uniform pickups. Receiving their membership materials at this time is optimal for the children’s parents asking where to buy fins and sunglasses. Da Fin and Hobie Sunglasses are great options, but not in October. In addition, an ID card saying they are a USLA Junior Lifeguard is exciting for the kids and enhances their enthusiasm for what USLA has to offer, as well as for participating in their junior lifeguard program.

Encourage agencies to enroll their entire program as part of their registration process. This may include allowing individual programs to join the USLA by purchasing the quantity of memberships needed for their entire program and then issue the memberships to their JG Participants (perhaps with something such as a coupon code that allows them to enroll/renew for free, since the program has already paid for the membership fee). If that is not possible, show the benefits of being a USLA Junior Lifeguard, so program coordinators can encourage participation. Simplifying bulk group registration is also important. Many junior lifeguard coordinators are short on time. To avoid USLA issuing new membership numbers to returning members, the bulk registration process (at least for Newport Beach) requires staff to cross reference the current year’s junior lifeguard enrollment against all prior USLA enrollment for members who still qualify by age. For Newport, this means receiving a list of over 3,000 USLA memberships and comparing it against the current year’s enrollment.

Development of a USLA Junior Lifeguard Training handbook that supplements individual program- training material. This would appeal to program coordinators and give the USLA a presence in the learning process. Development of an off-season training guide that prepares children for junior lifeguard tryouts. Develop USLA social media platforms such as twitter, Instagram, and snap chat that provide Junior Lifeguard content.

These are just few ideas

Brent Jacobsen

United States Lifesaving Association Junior Lifeguard of the Year Application

• Applications are due by the beginning of the Fall USLA Board of Directors Meeting. • Applications should be turned in the Chapter and Regional USLA representative. • Include a photo of candidate. • USLA JG Membership required.

Please complete this application by computer or type (no hand printing). Candidate Name:

Age: DOB: / / (Month Day Year)

Address:

City: State: Zip:

Phone Number: ( )

E mail:

Years in a Junior Guard Program:

Agency:

USLA Chapter:

Submitted by:

Jr. Lifeguard Coordinator:

Date submitted:

1. Qualities this candidate possesses that qualifies them for this award (example: leadership, citizenship, sportsmanship, etc.)

2. Give a specific example where the candidate displayed the above qualities in an exemplary manner.

3. How has this candidate impacted or contributed to your Junior Lifeguard Program? United States Lifesaving Association Lifesaving Sport Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Officer: Ed Zebrowski, III

Activities and Accomplishments

1. National Teams attended 2017 ISRC 2. Initiated National Teams High Performance Squad selections 3. Established lines of communication and protocols with National Team Management 4. Worked with VBLSA on 2018 National Championships 5. Chair attended ILS Sport Commission Meeting Conference Call(s) Summary

1. Rule Book reorganization planning is underway with Vice-Chair Butki. There will be some immediate corrections and clarifications; however this is a long-term project that will be conducted thoroughly. 2. Sport Development planning is also underway with Vice-Chair McCrady. Again, this has both short- term and long-term phases. 3. National Team Management is ongoing and there are perpetual updates from Vice-Chair Gill. Currently attempting to complete planning for Sanyo Cup Team before LWC2018. 4. National Championships and Sponsors Vice-Chair Zebrowski, Jr. is currently working on several areas of negotiations with sponsors and hosts. It is anticipated that some announcements will be forthcoming at this meeting or in the next few weeks.

Page 1 of 1

The USLA National Team competed against National Teams from Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Great Britain, and South Africa at the 2017 International Surf Rescue Challenge.

The International Surf Rescue Challenge was held at Mount Maunganui Beach, New Zealand from November 30th – December 3rd, 2017.

The United States Lifesaving Association utilizes competition as a means to promote elite fitness levels for lifeguards, promote lifesaving sport and education around the country and offer a select few the opportunity to represent our nation as athletes and ambassadors around the world.

2017 International Surf Rescue Challenge USLA National Team

Women Amanda Calabrese Hampton (NY) Casey Francis Virginia Beach (VA) Hallie Petersohn Volusia (FL) Jenna Solberg Los Angeles County (CA) Renae Jackson California State Parks (CA) Shannon Snell Miami Beach (FL)

Men Chase Robertson Palm Beach County (FL) Hayden Hemmens Newport Beach (CA) Pat Kilgallen Riis Park (NY) Ryan Paroz Hampton (NY) Tim Burdiak Los Angeles County (CA) Tim Cabasino Long Beach (NY)

The United States Lifesaving Association is America's nonprofit professional association of beach lifeguards and open water rescuers. The USLA works to reduce the incidence of death and injury in the aquatic environment through public education, national lifeguard standards, training programs, promotion of high levels of lifeguard readiness, and other means.

The Australian National Team won the open team title, as well as the Tran Tasman, and Tri Nations. They were followed closely by the 2016 World Champion New Zealand Black Fins, who finished second in the open team title and second in the Tran Tasman. Taking third place in the overall team title was team USA. The USLA National Team finished ahead of South Africa by 22 points. Following South Africa were the National Teams of Japan, Great Britain, and Canada.

This was the first time the USLA National Team has finished ahead of the South African National Team at an ISRC event. It was a collective team effort to finish in third place. Each athlete contributed to the team's success and there was great strength in the team unity. The athletes represented the United of States with both honor and pride throughout the competition.

Competitive highlights came from all angles on the open team over the three ISRC tests . Hayden Hemmens earned top 3 finishes on all 3 tests in both the Ironman and surf races. Ryan Paroz earned 3rd place finishes in the Ski and Board races. Both Hallie Petersohn and Casey Francis earned 3rd place finishes in the female surf race. In the female beach events Amanda Calabrese (Beach Flags) and Shannon Snell(Beach Sprint) earned 2nd place finishes. Tim Cabasino earned a 3rd place finish in the Beach Flags. The Open Mixed Surf Teams (Pat Kilgallen, Hayden Hemmens, Hallie Petersohn, Casey Francis) earned 3rd place on all 3 tests behind the Australian and New Zealand teams. Open Female Board Rescue Team (Hallie Petersohn, Jenna Solberg) finished in 3rd place on test #3. Open Male- Rescue Tube Race Team (Tim Cabasino, Pat Kilgallen, Ryan Paroz, Tim Burdiak) earned 2nd place on test #3. On the final day both male(Hemmens , Paroz,Burdiak, Cabasino) and female (Petersohn, Solberg, Jackson, Calabrese) taplin relays finished strong with 3rd place podium finishes.

Assisting USLA National Team Manager Dr. Mike Barrows and USLA National Team Head Coach Tom McGibeny as an assistant coach was Luke Turner. The female team members were Amanda Calabrese (Hampton Beach, NY), Casey Francis (Virginia Beach, VA), Hallie Petersohn (Volusia County, FL), Jenna Solberg (Los Angeles County), Renae Jackson (California State Parks), and Shannon Snell (Miami Beach). The male members were Chase Robertson (Palm Beach County, FL), Hayden Hemmens (Newport Beach, CA), Pat Kilgallen (Riis Park, NY), Ryan Paroz (Hampton, NY), Tim Burdiak (Los Angeles County), and Tim Cabasino (Long Beach, NY).

The United States Lifesaving Association is America's nonprofit professional association of beach lifeguards and open water rescuers. The USLA works to reduce the incidence of death and injury in the aquatic environment through public education, national lifeguard standards, training programs, promotion of high levels of lifeguard readiness, and other means. United States Lifesaving Association Membership Activity Report

Date: 4/26/2018 Chairperson: Charlie Hartl

Introduction

Welcome to this meeting and review of the upcoming season.

Activities and Accomplishments (Since Prior Board of Directors Meeting. Include information on how the committee is promoting the Water Safety USA message)

1. I have been working with Uniserv on getting bags, hats, and a discount card from Jersey Mike’s Subs. I would like to also thank Ed Zebrowski Jr for helping to put this sponsoring of our membership. The bags and hats will be send out in bulk as before. The discount card will be in membership kit envelope. 2. The USLA/Hobie buffs are being supplied by Hobie and we will distribute in membership envelope (this could change and be send bulk with other items from Jersey Mike’s Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration

1. We plan to have the Water Safety USA message included with our kit. 2. We need to put in place our membership processing for this season and send out the templates.

Page 1 of 1 United States Lifesaving Association Public Education Committee Activity Report

Date: Thursday, April 26, 2018 Officer: Denise Blair

Activities and Accomplishments (Since Prior Board of Directors Meeting)

1. National Beach Safety Challenge The submissions for the 2017 National Beach Safety Challenge are: Southeast Region, Shore Beach Service, Cape May Beach Patrol and Jax Beach Ocean Rescue. The awards will be presented at the Spring Meeting. 2. Water Safety USA New safety tip will be released in May. Mr. Brewster suggested the committee to review the current USLA Safety Tips and discuss the possibility of adding one or two of the Water Safety USA tips. We will discuss this during the committee meeting. 3. Pub Ed Materials Pub Ed material is available online to download and reprint. There are bookmarks and wristbands available. 4. Grant Program The revised grant program paperwork was posted on the website. The deadline was extended until April 1st. An email blast was sent out to the membership. Several submissions were received. Mr. Silvestri will present these submissions during the committee meeting. The committee will vote on which grants to approve. 5. NJ Bill A5159 Update The bill did not make it through the legislative process last year. Please see the attached update from Assemblyman Kean’s Chief of Staff. His office believes that support/endorsement from the USLA will show how important this bill is. 6. Elementary Beach Safety Presentation Kevin O’Donnell has developed a preliminary beach safety presentation to be used with grades Pre K – 4th grade. He has included USLA developed materials. Please take a minute to review the presentation and make any suggestions. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1fI_nzaN39SXu3rycauJ4HrIFCGJQX- 2ceQBQaqJVcbk/edit?usp=sharing (See the attached document for background information) 7. Wall Intermediate School Health Fair I was asked to host a table at the Wall Intermediate School Health Fair. We set the table with wristbands, bookmarks, rip current brochures and posters, as well as USLA brochures. The night was successful. The head of the recreation department asked for us to have a table at the Wall Township Festival in June. 8. Website The sub group has been sharing ideas on how to improve the pub ed section of the website. More discussion will follow in the meeting. Attachments 1. Public Education Committee Agenda 2. Water Safety Bill Update 3. Water Safety Legislation 4. Elementary Water Safety Presentation

Page 1 of 1 Water Safety Bill Update

12/6/17

Assembly Bill 5159 was considered by the Assembly Education Committee on Monday, December 4, 2017. The bill was combined with a very similar measure A-5155 and some changes were made. Now, A5155/A5159 directs the State Board of Education to review and incorporate within the New Jersey Learning Standards for Comprehensive Health and Physical Education instructional standards on water safety.

There were some issues with how the bill was previously written and there is greater support for the committee substitute which directs the State Board of Education to review and within one year incorporate instructional standards on water safety.

That all said, we are coming to the end of the 2016-2017 Legislative Session and any bills that have not moved through the legislative process effectively die. That means the legislation has to be reintroduced in 2018. Most likely, A5155/5159 will not go through the entire legislative process before the next session. Asm. Kean was planning on introducing his water safety bill again and will cosponsor A5155/5159 next session (the first sponsor is Asw. Quijano). The bill will receive a new number in the next session and I will let you know this number as soon as possible.

4/13/18

Sean reintroduced the water safety bill this legislative session & the bill number is A-269. It was referred to the Assembly Education Committee. It has not been posted for a vote yet. Sean did write the Chairwoman of the Education Committee and asked her to post it for a vote. The legislature is taking a brief budget break right now, so regular committees do not meet again until May.

United States Lifesaving Association Ways & Means Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Officer: Michael Bradley

Introduction

Thank you all for joining us here in Long Beach as we continue the business of the USLA. I’d like to extend a special welcome to new regional treasurers and committee chairs. I look forward to working with you all.

Activities and Accomplishments (Since Prior Board of Directors Meeting. Include information on how the committee is promoting the Water Safety USA message)

1. Continue to act on behalf of the USLA on all financial matters. 2. Continue to use Quickbooks Online to improve invoicing and financial record keeping. 3. Completed the 2017 Audit and Tax filing.

Conference Call(s) Summary

1. Discussions with the Executive Director as we worked on invoicing and customer accounts.

Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration

1. Discuss general details and routines of the fiscal year. 2. Review 2017 financial data. 3. Act of requests from committee members and provide recommendations to the Board of Directors. 4. 2017 Budget Notes: 4.1. 2017 closed with a net loss of (-$14,893.49). 4.2. The 2017 Lifesaving Sport budget had net operating revenue of (-$2,253.61). The National Competition did well generating a net revenue of $11,190.00, however this is only part of the overall Lifesaving Sport budget. The continued lack of a title sponsor contributes heavily to the overall USLA budget shortfalls as it limits the revenue potential of the National competition. There are other expense lines in Lifesaving Sport to be aware of such as the annual contribution to the National Team. 4.3. The closing value of USLA reserve funds on December 31, 2017 was $237,214.60. In January 2017 we began the process of investing reserves with a starting value of $225,000.00. Of the increased value of $12,314.60 in 2017, $2,624.40 were paid dividends.

Attachments

1. 2017 Draft Balance Sheet 2. 2017 Draft Budget 3. 2017 Draft National Team Budget 4. 2017 Youth National Team Budget 5. 2017 Draft Mexican Lifesaving Fund 6. 2017 Reserve Investment Report

Page 1 of 9

United States Lifesaving Association BALANCE REPORT As of December 31, 2017

Total ASSETS Current Assets Bank Accounts Bank of America Bank of America Checking 21,704.03 Bank of America Maximizer 46,854.65 Total Bank of America $ 68,558.68 Fidelity Investments 227,624.40 Paypal 5.11 Total Bank Accounts $ 296,188.19 Total Current Assets $ 296,188.19 TOTAL ASSETS $ 296,188.19 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY Liabilities Current Liabilities Credit Cards Credit Card Avila 3,102.01 Barrows 5,510.92 Bradley 9,988.75 Payment Account (18,601.68) Total Credit Card $ - Total Credit Cards $ - Total Current Liabilities $ - Long-Term Liabilities Competition - National Team 20,638.03 Youth National Team 9,864.39 Total Competition - National Team $ 30,502.42 Mexican Lifesaving Fund 24,407.15 Statistics Software Project 12,000.00 Total Long-Term Liabilities $ 66,909.57 Total Liabilities $ 66,909.57 Equity Unrestricted Net Assets 244,172.11 Net Revenue (14,893.49) Total Equity $ 229,278.62 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $ 296,188.19

Page 2 of 9

United States Lifesaving Association PROFIT & LOSS BUDGET vs. ACTUAL January - December 2017

Total

Actual Budget over Budget

Revenue

ALM Revenue 21,037.63 20,048.00 989.63 Awards/Presentations Income 50.00 50.00 0.00 Certification Fees 22,630.00 15,000.00 7,630.00 Donations 2,930.55 4,600.00 (1,669.45) Event Registrations 45,352.73 29,000.00 16,352.73 Interest 2,634.63 300.00 2,334.63 Lifesaving Sport Income 98,303.00 118,500.00 (20,197.00) Membership Dues 168,159.00 175,375.00 (7,216.00) Royalties 8,093.44 4,360.00 3,733.44 Sponsorship 18,723.14 26,000.00 (7,276.86) Uncategorized Revenue 2.00 2.00

Total Revenue $ 387,916.12 $ 393,233.00 $ (5,316.88) Gross Profit $ 387,916.12 $ 393,233.00 $ (5,316.88) Expenditures

Administration 62,459.11 58,000.00 4,459.11 American Lifeguard Magazine 34,379.80 35,000.00 (620.20) Awards & Special Presentations 1,211.52 1,000.00 211.52 Credit Card Charges 7,656.48 6,300.00 1,356.48 Donation 2,815.00 1,500.00 1,315.00 Event Host 42,892.40 29,000.00 13,892.40 Information Technology 9,637.97 8,950.00 687.97 Insurance & Bonds 7,897.00 7,000.00 897.00 International Relations 7,258.71 10,500.00 (3,241.29) Junior Lifeguards 1,000.00 (1,000.00)

Lifesaving Sport 100,556.61 91,063.00 9,493.61 Membership Kits 63,207.14 63,000.00 207.14 Office Expenses 249.51 500.00 (250.49) Presidential Discretionary Fund 586.52 1,000.00 (413.48) Professional Fees 3,822.00 5,000.00 (1,178.00) Public Education 5,271.35 12,000.00 (6,728.65) Regions % of Member Dues 38,048.00 40,295.00 (2,247.00) USLA Travel and Meetings 14,860.49 21,400.00 (6,539.51) Total Expenditures $ 402,809.61 $ 392,508.00 $ 10,301.61 Net Operating Revenue $ (14,893.49) $ 725.00 $ (15,618.49) Net Revenue $ (14,893.49) $ 725.00 $ (15,618.49)

Page 3 of 9 United States Lifesaving Association NATIONAL COMPETITION TEAM Report January - December 2017

Transaction Date Type Vendor Memo/Description Amount Balance

Competition - National Team

Beginning Balance 7,170.99

01/01/2017 Journal Entry Deposit 14,000.00 21,170.99

05/01/2017 Expenditure CHECKCARD 0428 AGENT FEE 7817980 (35.00) 21,135.99

05/01/2017 Expenditure CHINA EASTE 78179 (803.46) 20,332.53

05/08/2017 Expenditure CHECKCARD 0504 AGENT FEE 0067980 (25.00) 20,307.53

05/08/2017 Expenditure DELTA AIR 0067980 (375.40) 19,932.13

06/01/2017 Deposit Bluepay Golf Tour: Santa Monica College 440.00 20,372.13

06/02/2017 Deposit Bluepay Golf Tour - Dianna Cantero 110.00 20,482.13

06/02/2017 Deposit Bluepay Golf Tour - Dianna Cantero 50.00 20,532.13

06/02/2017 Deposit Bluepay Golf Tour - Mel Solberg 110.00 20,642.13

06/05/2017 Deposit Bluepay Golf Tour - Rossi Law Group 900.00 21,542.13

06/08/2017 Deposit Bluepay Golf Tour South Coast Aquatics 300.00 21,842.13

06/13/2017 Check Mike Barrows Flight Reimbursement (978.46) 20,863.67 Credit Card 06/26/2017 Expenditure Hamakatsu Fukuokamomoc (146.44) 20,717.23

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Golf Tour - Pyzow 440.00 21,157.23

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Golf Tour - Galpin Ford 500.00 21,657.23

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Golf Tour - Davis Family Trust 440.00 22,097.23

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Golf Tour - Santa Cruz Surf Life Saving Assn. 300.00 22,397.23

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Golf Tour - Redrow 110.00 22,507.23

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Golf Tour - Wamsley 100.00 22,607.23

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Golf Tour - McIntosh 120.00 22,727.23

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Golf Tour - Moldavon 110.00 22,837.23

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Golf Tour - Hontas 110.00 22,947.23

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Golf Tour - Buhr 160.00 23,107.23

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Golf Tour - Kelly 130.00 23,237.23

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Golf Tour - Philnan 110.00 23,347.23

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Golf Tour - McVerry 100.00 23,447.23

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Golf Tour - Baz Brothers Unlimited, INC 750.00 24,197.23

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Golf Tour - Galpin Ford 1,000.00 25,197.23 Credit Card 06/28/2017 Expenditure The Residential Suites (505.42) 24,691.81

07/05/2017 Journal Entry Sanyo Busson Competitor Fees 2,500.00 27,191.81

07/07/2017 Expenditure Val Verde Graphic Team Shirts (218.50) 26,973.31

07/07/2017 Check Randall Eichoff USLA Golf Tournament Expenses (1,770.00) 25,203.31

07/17/2017 Deposit Bluepay Golf Tour - Giachini 50.00 25,253.31

08/25/2017 Expenditure Aquawear INV 3845 (2,392.89) 22,860.42

08/29/2017 Journal Entry National Team Contribution 543 x$3 1,629.00 24,489.42

09/05/2017 Deposit Deposit Casey Frances 650.00 25,139.42

Page 4 of 9 09/05/2017 Deposit Deposit Chase Robertson 650.00 25,789.42

09/08/2017 Expenditure UNITED 01686745588161 800-932-2732 TX (564.40) 25,225.02

09/08/2017 Expenditure AIR NZ 08686729181664 SAN JOSE CA (995.66) 24,229.36 DELTA 00686745588174 VIRGINIA BCH 09/08/2017 Expenditure VA (547.40) 23,681.96 AGENT FEE 89086745588164 TRAVEL 09/08/2017 Expenditure LEADER VA (25.00) 23,656.96 AGENT FEE 89086745588175 TRAVEL 09/08/2017 Expenditure LEADER VA (25.00) 23,631.96 AGENT FEE 89007133711775 TRAVEL 09/11/2017 Expenditure LEADER VA (35.00) 23,596.96 AGENT FEE 89007133711786 TRAVEL 09/11/2017 Expenditure LEADER VA (35.00) 23,561.96

09/11/2017 Deposit Deposit Hayden (Ocean Paddlesports) 650.00 24,211.96

09/11/2017 Deposit Deposit Pat Kilgallen 650.00 24,861.96

09/11/2017 Deposit Deposit Ryan Paroz 650.00 25,511.96

09/11/2017 Deposit Deposit Amanda Calabrese 650.00 26,161.96

09/11/2017 Deposit Deposit Tim Burdiak 650.00 26,811.96

09/11/2017 Deposit Deposit Tim Cabasino 650.00 27,461.96

09/11/2017 Deposit Deposit John Snell 650.00 28,111.96

09/16/2017 Expenditure Mike Barrows Tom M. Flight (995.66) 27,116.30

09/18/2017 Deposit Monmouth County USLA Program Book - Monmouth County 400.00 27,516.30 Endurant Sport LLC - Program Book Full Page 09/18/2017 Deposit Ad 400.00 27,916.30

09/21/2017 Expenditure Jobbeedu INVOICE 7868 (159.00) 27,757.30

09/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Ranae Jackson 650.00 28,407.30

09/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Hallie Petersohn 650.00 29,057.30

10/06/2017 Deposit Deposit Jenna Solsberg 650.00 29,707.30

10/10/2017 Deposit Bluepay Kirsten Berthold (CHASE ROBERTSON) 50.00 29,757.30

10/16/2017 Deposit Deposit Pine Crest - Ad 175.00 29,932.30

10/16/2017 Deposit Bluepay Lisa Cox (Chase Robertson) 25.00 29,957.30

10/23/2017 Deposit Bluepay Russell Lewey (CHASE ROBERTSON) 100.00 30,057.30

10/24/2017 Deposit Bluepay Jane Grossman (CHASE ROBERTSON) 100.00 30,157.30

10/25/2017 Expenditure Bank of America Wire Transfer Fee (17.50) 30,139.80

10/25/2017 Expenditure Bank of America Hotel Armitage (6,483.23) 23,656.57

10/25/2017 Deposit Deposit Hartl 300.00 23,956.57

10/30/2017 Deposit Deposit Jason Baldessan - Program Ad 175.00 24,131.57

10/30/2017 Deposit Deposit Chase Robertson - Program Ad 400.00 24,531.57

10/30/2017 Deposit Donation John Wayne Foundation - Program Ad 400.00 24,931.57

11/01/2017 Deposit Bank of America Offer Fulfillment: Refund FX Wir 12.50 24,944.07

11/02/2017 Expenditure Perry's Trophy INVOICE B14825 (80.00) 24,864.07

11/13/2017 Deposit 1/2 page ad - Palm Beach 250.00 25,114.07 Registration SURF LIFE SAVING NZ 11/14/2017 Expenditure Bank of America WELGTN (1,755.30) 23,358.77

11/17/2017 Deposit National Team Ad SALA 400.00 23,758.77

11/21/2017 Deposit Deposit Hobe Sound Athletics "CHASE ROBERTSON" 175.00 23,933.77

11/27/2017 Deposit Nassau County Tim Cabinsino 400.00 24,333.77

11/27/2017 Deposit Deposit CHASE ROBERTSON 700.00 25,033.77

11/29/2017 Expenditure HIDE MT MAUNGANUI (306.84) 24,726.93

11/29/2017 Expenditure COUNTDOWN BURETA PARK TAURANGA (91.32) 24,635.61

Page 5 of 9 12/01/2017 Expenditure MOUNT HOT POOLS MT MAUNGANUI (9.67) 24,625.94

12/01/2017 Expenditure WATERMAN STORE MOUNT MAUNGAN (34.43) 24,591.51

12/01/2017 Expenditure CROWN AND BADGER PUB TAURANGA (333.76) 24,257.75

12/02/2017 Expenditure HOTSPOT SUPERETTE TAURANGA NZL (54.89) 24,202.86

12/02/2017 Expenditure CORNERSTONE PUB TAURANGA (320.28) 23,882.58

12/03/2017 Expenditure HOTSPOT SUPERETTE TAURANGA NZL (46.33) 23,836.25

12/04/2017 Expenditure CALTEX KATIKATI KATIKATI (13.82) 23,822.43

12/04/2017 Expenditure PACE COURIERS MOUNT EDEN (477.11) 23,345.32

12/05/2017 Expenditure HERTZ NZ CHRISTCHURCH (943.15) 22,402.17 Dagan Sales & MKTG., 12/06/2017 Check INC INV 24753 Hats (247.75) 22,154.42

12/17/2017 Check Luke Turner Hertz Rental and Gas (904.26) 21,250.16

12/17/2017 Check Bank of America Wire Fee (35.00) 21,215.16

12/17/2017 Check Mainfreight Air & Ocean Mainfreight Shipping (977.13) 20,238.03

12/28/2017 Deposit SER Program Book Ad 400.00 20,638.03

Total for Competition - National Team $ 20,638.03

Youth National Team

Beginning Balance 6,796.63

05/02/2017 Deposit Donation Graessle 50.00 6,846.63

05/02/2017 Deposit Donation Gonzalez 25.00 6,871.63

05/02/2017 Deposit Donation Sabad 25.00 6,896.63

05/02/2017 Deposit Donation Ward Coffey Shapes 25.00 6,921.63

05/02/2017 Deposit Donation Nickerson Family Trust 25.00 6,946.63

05/02/2017 Deposit Donation Gonzalez 25.00 6,971.63

05/02/2017 Deposit Donation Whitmore 25.00 6,996.63

05/02/2017 Deposit Donation Colomer 50.00 7,046.63

05/02/2017 Deposit Donation Prussak, Welch & Avila, Inc 25.00 7,071.63

05/02/2017 Deposit Donation Maine 25.00 7,096.63

05/02/2017 Deposit Donation Wood 25.00 7,121.63

05/25/2017 Deposit Donation Rhee 50.00 7,171.63

05/25/2017 Deposit Donation Maine 50.00 7,221.63

05/25/2017 Deposit Donation Tenansnow 50.00 7,271.63

05/25/2017 Deposit Donation Colomer 100.00 7,371.63

05/25/2017 Deposit Donation Lago 50.00 7,421.63

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit TGR Trust 50.00 7,471.63

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Gonzalez 50.00 7,521.63

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Wood 50.00 7,571.63

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Sabad 50.00 7,621.63

06/27/2017 Deposit Deposit Whitmore 50.00 7,671.63

07/03/2017 Deposit Donation LA County Fire Dept. Junior Lifeguard Program 100.00 7,771.63

07/03/2017 Deposit Donation LA County Fire Dept. Junior Guard Program 50.00 7,821.63

07/07/2017 Expenditure Val Verde Graphic Team Shirts (623.50) 7,198.13

07/08/2017 Deposit Donation Maine 100.00 7,298.13

07/08/2017 Deposit Donation Gonzalez 50.00 7,348.13

07/08/2017 Deposit Donation Rhee 50.00 7,398.13

Page 6 of 9 07/08/2017 Deposit Donation SB Training 250.00 7,648.13

07/08/2017 Deposit Donation Tenansnow 50.00 7,698.13

07/08/2017 Deposit Donation Booth 50.00 7,748.13

07/17/2017 Deposit Bluepay James 25.00 7,773.13

07/17/2017 Deposit Bluepay Tucker 25.00 7,798.13

07/21/2017 Deposit Bluepay Michael Dean 25.00 7,823.13

08/04/2017 Deposit Donation Prussak, Wech Avila, Inc 50.00 7,873.13

08/04/2017 Deposit Donation Gonzalez 50.00 7,923.13

08/04/2017 Deposit Donation Tenansnow 50.00 7,973.13

08/04/2017 Deposit Donation Maine 50.00 8,023.13

08/04/2017 Deposit Donation Rhee 50.00 8,073.13

08/04/2017 Deposit Donation Lago 75.00 8,148.13

08/08/2017 Deposit Bluepay Christopher Cole 75.00 8,223.13

08/29/2017 Journal Entry U19 Team Contribution 352 x$5 1,760.00 9,983.13

09/05/2017 Deposit Bluepay Randall Quinones - IRSC 2017 - U19 800.00 10,783.13 Emma Sainsbury-Carter/U19 Youth Team - 09/11/2017 Deposit Bluepay New Zealand 800.00 11,583.13

09/14/2017 Deposit Bluepay Swanson ISRC 800.00 12,383.13

09/27/2017 Deposit Bluepay SER: Diana Freshour 800.00 13,183.13

09/27/2017 Deposit Bluepay SER: Alejandro Quinones 800.00 13,983.13

09/27/2017 Deposit Bluepay SER: Isabella Taylor 800.00 14,783.13

09/29/2017 Deposit Bluepay Holly Maine 800.00 15,583.13

10/02/2017 Deposit Bluepay Val Ferraro 800.00 16,383.13

10/04/2017 Deposit Bluepay Maggie Purcell 800.00 17,183.13

10/04/2017 Deposit Bluepay (REFUND) Randall Quinones (800.00) 16,383.13

10/10/2017 Deposit Bluepay Kelta O'Rourke 800.00 17,183.13

10/10/2017 Deposit Bluepay Edward Booth (ZANE BOOTH) 25.00 17,208.13

10/10/2017 Deposit Bluepay Theo Kracke (ZANE BOOTH) 100.00 17,308.13

10/10/2017 Deposit Bluepay M. Henry (ZANE BOOTH) 50.00 17,358.13

10/10/2017 Deposit Bluepay Jamie Sonsini (ZANE BOOTH) 25.00 17,383.13

10/10/2017 Deposit Bluepay Michele Janee (ZANE BOOTH) 25.00 17,408.13

10/13/2017 Deposit Bluepay Mike Brashears (Zane Booth) 250.00 17,658.13

10/16/2017 Deposit Bluepay Amy Healy (Zane Booth) 150.00 17,808.13

10/16/2017 Deposit Bluepay Walter Cerny, Still Frothy 501-c3 (Zane Booth) 200.00 18,008.13

10/16/2017 Deposit Bluepay Perry Russell (Zane Booth) 25.00 18,033.13

10/18/2017 Deposit Bluepay Sally Saenger (ZANE BOOTH) 50.00 18,083.13

10/24/2017 Deposit Bluepay Adrienne Groh 25.00 18,108.13

10/25/2017 Expenditure Bank of America Hotel Armitage (6,483.23) 11,624.90

10/25/2017 Deposit Deposit Pepito 300.00 11,924.90

10/25/2017 Expenditure Bank of America Wire Transfer Fee (17.50) 11,907.40

11/01/2017 Deposit Bluepay Benjamin Tran 800.00 12,707.40

11/01/2017 Deposit Bank of America Offer Fulfillment: Refund FX Wir 12.50 12,719.90

11/02/2017 Deposit Bluepay Capitola JG - Chloe Kimes 800.00 13,519.90 Registration SURF LIFE SAVING NZ 11/14/2017 Expenditure Bank of America WELGTN (1,905.75) 11,614.15

11/21/2017 Deposit Bluepay Chris Cole 800.00 12,414.15

11/27/2017 Expenditure PAK N SAVE TAURANGA TAURANGA (237.54) 12,176.61 Page 7 of 9 11/28/2017 Expenditure NEW WORLD GATE PA TAURANGA (203.18) 11,973.43

11/28/2017 Expenditure DOMINOS TAURANGA TAURANGA (75.48) 11,897.95

11/29/2017 Deposit Bluepay Christopher Dubs (CHASEN DUBS) 800.00 12,697.95

11/30/2017 Expenditure BELLA ITALIA MOUNT MAUNGAN (35.12) 12,662.83

12/01/2017 Expenditure CORNERSTONE PUB TAURANGA (280.64) 12,382.19

12/01/2017 Expenditure NEW WORLD GATE PA TAURANGA (213.66) 12,168.53 PIZZA HUT MT MAUNGANUI MT 12/02/2017 Expenditure MAUNGANUI (43.53) 12,125.00

12/03/2017 Expenditure Z CENTRAL PARADE MT MAUNGANUI (99.15) 12,025.85

12/04/2017 Expenditure CORNERSTONE PUB TAURANGA (81.19) 11,944.66

12/04/2017 Expenditure Z TOM PEARCE AUCKLAND AIRP (20.96) 11,923.70

12/05/2017 Expenditure HERTZ NZ CHRISTCHURCH (938.30) 10,985.40

12/05/2017 Expenditure HERTZ NZ CHRISTCHURCH (873.26) 10,112.14 Dagan Sales & MKTG., 12/06/2017 Check INC INV 24753 Hats (247.75) 9,864.39

Total for Youth National Team $ 9,864.39

Page 8 of 9

United States Lifesaving Association Mexican Lifesaving Fund Report January - December 2017

Date Name Amount Balance

Mexican Lifesaving Fund

Beginning Balance 24,858.96

02/08/2017 Network Solutions (69.97) 24,788.99

02/15/2017 Neoverve.com (251.88) 24,537.11

02/27/2017 Network Solutions (113.97) 24,423.14

06/28/2017 Network Solutions (15.99) 24,407.15

Total for Mexican Lifesaving Fund $ (451.81)

TOTAL $ (451.81)

UNITED STATES LIFESAVING ASSOCIATION RESERVE FUNDS

Policy - Operational Reserve funds may be conservatively invested in liquid investments with a target of no less than 30% in Fidelity Cash Reserves,20% be in Core U.S. Treasury Bonds and 50% be in ETF that follows the Russell 3000 Index. The Treasurer shall ensure that the fund is rebalanced whenever target percentages vary by more than 5%. RESERVE FUNDS $70,073.12 Fidelity Government Cash Reserves (30%) FDRXX $122,323.20 ISHARES CORE S&P US VALUE ETF (52%) IUSV $44,918.28 U.S. TREASURY BOND ETF (19%) GOVT $237,314.60 Total

PRINCIPAL CHANGES $30,431.59 Opening Value $249,568.41 Additions ($55,000.00) Subtractions ($0) Investment Fees $12,314.60 Change in Investment Value $237,314.60 Closing Value

Page 9 of 9 United States Lifesaving Association Heritage Committee Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Officer: Jerry Gavin

Introduction

Activities and Accomplishments (Since Prior Board of Directors Meeting. Include information on how the committee is promoting the Water Safety USA message)

1. Received Heritage interview materials from Phil Rogers. 2. Thumb drives completed and will be distributed. 3. Work continued on editing interviews that have been conducted to 10 – 15 minutes, from 2 hours. 4. Water Safety USA pictures and posters transferred to Public Education. 5. Work on Liability Releases continues. 6. Exploration of website access and use for interviews continues. 7. Interviews in Long Beach discussed.

Page 1 of 1 United States Lifesaving Association Information Technology Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Officer: Karissa Ickes Introduction

I am pleased to submit the following report on USLA Information Technology activity since our fall meeting. I will not be in attendance this meeting, but please do not hesitate to reach out to me for anything while you are in beautiful Long Beach. Activities and Accomplishments

1. Special Projects 1.1. E-Blasts: Special E-Blasts since the last meeting included, but were not limited to, the following: 1.1.1. U19 High Performance Squad Application announced the application process for the U19 High Performance Squad. U19 High Performance Squad Application was sent to 8,135 recipients (with 4,904 “Total Views”) on 1/27/18. 1.1.2. The Ben Carlson Memorial Scholarship & Deadline informed recipients of a scholarship opportunity being offered by the Ben Carlson Foundation. It was noted that the scholarship is being offered independently of the USLA. The Ben Carlson Memorial Scholarship & Deadline was sent to 12,091 recipients (with 7,616 “Total Views” and 965 “Total Click-Backs”) on 2/11/18. 1.1.3. USLA Education Grant Deadline Extension notified recipients that the application deadline for the USLA Education Grant was extended to April 1, 2018. USLA Education Grant Deadline Extension was sent to 9,888 recipients (with 4,022 “Total Views”) on 3/17/18. 1.1.4. Spring 2018 BOD Meeting Reminder conveyed important information about the spring 2018 BOD Meeting. Topics ranging from registration and lodging information were disseminated to 10,222 recipients (with 4,141 “Total Views”) on 3/24/18. 1.2. Statistics Database: Initial research has been conducted in an ongoing endeavor to augment our current Statistics Database. Collaborated with Mr. Rick Gould, Mr. Peter Davis, Mr. Chris Brewster, Ms. Kay Smiley and Mr. Michael Bradley to identify a system that can meet the current needs of the USLA. Additional meetings will be held in Long Beach to determine next steps. 2. General Business: 2.1. IT Committee Chair: Continued to work with the USLA Leadership on various issues related to www.usla.org, the Statistics database, Scoring & Social Media. 2.2. “Contact USLA”: Collaborated with Ms. Charlotte Graham to manage the “contact forms” that are generated via the “Contact Us” area of www.usla.org. Most inquiries are general questions (password recoveries, parties interested in becoming lifeguards and general questions about the USLA). Worked with USLA Officers and Leadership to address all inquiries as appropriate. Distributed inquiries to appropriate parties on a regular basis (inquiries pertaining to membership, lifesaving sport, donations, treasury, junior guards, sponsorships, public education, certification, media, ALM, Heroic Acts, etc.). The USLA received approximately 175

inquiries via “contact form” between October 15 and April 24.

Page 1 of 3 2.3. Website Content: Created / Updated Site content including, but not limited to the following areas of the site: o Annual Report o Aquatic Rescue Response Team (ARRT) Course Completion Cards o Educational Grant Program o Hobie Polarized Members Only Discount o Junior Lifeguards o International Lifesaving Sport o Lifesaving Links o USLA Certified Lifeguard Agencies o USLA Guidelines o USLA High Performance Squad o USLA Junior Guard Program(s) Library o USLA Lifeguard Agency Certification Program o USLA Meeting Minutes o USLA National Structure o USLA Open National Team Selection Criteria 2.4. Event Submission Forms: Facilitated the “event submission forms” that are generated when an individual submits an event with the intent of that event being included in the USLA calendar / upcoming events section of www.usla.org. Added events to website as appropriate and facilitated online registrations and payments* upon request. Worked with Treasurer, Michael Bradley, to process online payments when applicable. The following events utilized www.usla.org to facilitate payment / registration for registrants: *Please note that the National Treasurer deducts 3% to cover credit card fees when distributing the money collected from the events that elect to use online registration. o SER Surf Lifesaving Training Officer Academy: Collaborated with Ms. Jo Wagenhals, Mr. Jim McCrady and Mr. Michael Bradley to facilitate the online registration and payments of 10 total attendees for the December 18th event. o 2018 Florida Surf Lifesaving Banquet: Collaborated with Ms. Jo Wagenhals and Mr. Michael Bradley to facilitate the online registration and payments of 7 total attendees for the March 2nd event. o CSLSA Spring Board of Directors Meeting: Collaborated with Ms. Charlotte Graham and Mr. Michael Bradley to facilitate the online registration and payments of 10 total attendees for the April 12th event. o USLA Spring 2018 Board of Directors Meeting: Collaborated with Ms. Nikki Bowie, Mr. Michael Beuerlein and Mr. Michael Bradley to facilitate the online registration and payments for this biannual event. Final registrant numbers TBA. 2.5. “Member Profile Updates”: Continued to moderate “member profile” updates to ensure that content is appropriate. 2.6. Forums: Continued to moderate the “Guard-to-Guard” and “Used Equipment Exchange*” Forums to ensure that content is appropriate. 2.7. Facebook: Continued to moderate the USLA “Facebook Page” to ensure that content is appropriate, answered inquiries and utilized this free media outlet (in collaboration with President Davis, Chris Brewster & Tom Gill) to frequently disseminate USLA news and information. The “likes” of our Facebook Page have increased from 5,059 in October 2017 to 5,164 in April 2018. 2.8. Treasury: Worked continuously with Mr. Michael Bradley to reconcile transactions originating from www.usla.org. Michael Bradley and I have continued to generate reports of online Page 2 of 3 membership registrations / renewals to match the financial batch reports sent out quarterly. At a minimum, reports are distributed to the Regional Treasurers on a quarterly basis. 2.9. Membership: Worked continuously with Ms. Charlotte Graham to facilitate the online membership registration process. Collaborated with Michael Bradley and Ms. Graham on a regular basis to ensure that transactions for membership dues are accurate. Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration

1. In 2018, we would like to examine the mix of information we are disseminating via email blast. We want to be sure that the number of promotional offers and surveys does not become too frequent or exceed the amount of relevant content that is being sent to our membership. 2. President Davis and I will be collaborating with appropriate individuals to send relevant eNewsletters to our membership on a more frequent basis. 3. The committee will work with Mike Wagner and the Social Media committee to examine and improve current Social Media practices. 4. Skip Prosser will not be available to facilitate scoring at this year’s National Championships. The committee will work closely with the Lifesaving Sport Committee to ensure that scoring continues to be a success at the 2018 event and that results are available in a timely fashion on www.usla.org.

Page 3 of 3 United States Lifesaving Association Fund Raising Project Work Group Activity Report

Date: April 15, 2018 Officer: Jim McCray

Introduction

Goal number four “Resources” of the USLA Strategic Plan is to develop and implement a major gift and endowment campaign program. The Project Groups goal will be to outline a plan and set goals and timelines to address USLA fundraising issues

Activities and Accomplishments

1. Identified work group members = Jim McCray, Mike Beuerlein, Tom Gill, Jerry Gavin, Michael Bradley, Ed Zedrowski II and Kay Smiley. 2. No activities since the Fall meeting

Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration

1. Approve priorities for USLA fundraising campaigns

Attachments

Fund Raising Needs

Page 1 of 1

Possible areas of focus for a National Fundraising Campaign

1. Membership

Funding for a national membership campaign and marketing materials to help expand and grow the USLA membership.

Scholarship fund to assist with travel expenses for the young recipient(s) to have exposure to the National USLA Board of Directors Meeting and Educational Conferences.

Funding for a Membership Coordinator

2. Public Education

Funding to create a national Water Safety Program(s) that can be presented to schools in minority communities and economically challenged neighborhoods, schools with a high percentage of free/reduced lunch.

USLA Public Education Grant Program

Banner or Billboard Program

PSA Ads

3. Training and Certification Programs

Funding to create online - eLearning Continuing Ed Modules.

Necessary resources to develop new USLA Certification Courses.

Scholarship Fund – to assist with the cost to attend new instructor and or Train the Trainer courses for new USLA Certification Courses.

4. Lifesaving Sport

Funding to provide training and education resources that assist in developing a National Officials Clinic for the USLA National Competition.

Funding to support the High-Performance Squad training program.

Funding to help the National Youth and or Adult team.

5. Junior Guards

Funding to provide valuable training and education resources to assist new Junior Guard Coordinators (teaching a National Curriculum)

6. Heroic Acts

Funding to help fund travel expenses for the young recipient(s) to attend their award presentation and to have exposure to the National USLA Conference.

7. Heritage Committee

Funding to assist with the production of the USLA Heritage Committee video.

8. Information and Technology

Funding to support improvement technology to help the USLA National in supporting local agencies.

Funding for Website Coordinator

9. Organization Support

Administrative/Infrastructure support to help with the future expansion of the USLA.

WHY DO WE HAVE A CAMPAIGN? It is not just about the money. A successful Support campaign mounted by USLA staff and volunteers helps achieve the mission and strengthen the unique nature of the USLA.

The campaign plays a key role by: . Providing funding to maintain and expand mission-based programs that require subsidies to cover operating costs. . Fostering in members the sense that the USLA is their USLA. Such commitment ensures the future of the USLA as a voluntary movement. . Encouraging members to adopt and practice the mission-based and value of philanthropy (giving time, talent and treasure to benefit others). . Securing community support of corporations and other businesses. . Providing for men and women an opportunity to discover and develop leadership and other personal skills needed to serve others and their community. . Providing an opportunity for USLA members to increase their circle of friends. . Creating greater understanding among USLA members of the wide scope and impact of USLA programs. . Communicating the USLA’s work to the wide community and building goodwill.

• In short, campaigning helps achieve the USLA’s basic mission – to reduce the incidence of death and injury in the aquatic environment through public education, national lifeguard standards, training programs, promotion of high levels of lifeguard readiness, and other means. Well-conducted USLA Member-to-Member Campaigns will help accomplish the mission of the USLA as effectively as any other USLA program.

• That’s why it’s so important that all USLA key volunteers and staff embrace the idea that an annual Support Campaign is a high priority.

• Making the successful execution of the campaign a top priority requires USLA staff to devote sufficient time and resources to ensure a successful campaign effort. The fact is, USLA will derive a great deal more than dollars alone from their campaigning efforts. They will also help every volunteer in the campaign experience a sense of satisfaction through the USLA’s mission. CAMPAIGN CASE: A comprehensive document that describes the rationale for the annual Support Campaign, uses of funds, and the benefits that will accrue to the USLA. This document serves as the basis for all campaign material including brochures, videos, etc.

CASE BOOK: A formal, often personalized, statement of the campaign case. It is used, often with pictures, to sell the USLA's "big idea in a capital campaign." MAJOR GIFTS: The process that operates year-round to secure the USLA's largest annual gifts. Solicitation usually involves the USLA president and a few key board members. Gifts received are often targeted for special purposes.

ROLE OF THE CAMPAIGN DIRECTOR (Kay)

The Campaign Director is responsible for the day to day execution of the campaign effort. That person will be the USLA Executive Director. The director must consider the campaign of highest priority, influencing Board members and others to assure success. Without that commitment to success, the campaign will fail. The Campaign Director directs the campaign by: . Preparing the General Plan (containing the campaign goal, table of organization, important campaign strategies, campaign calendar, expense budget, job descriptions). . Preparing the campaign case with key volunteers. . Recruiting the Campaign General Chair (with the Board Chair). . Serving as the USLA resource and campaign expert. . Supporting the Chair during recruitment of the top campaign leadership. . Developing and implementing the set of proven practices. . Providing training and motivational efforts throughout the campaign. . Reporting accurate and timely results to ensure all volunteers and leadership are up to date on the campaign’s progress. . Ensuring that all donors and volunteers are acknowledged and thanked for their efforts and sacrifice.

ROLE OF THE USLA BOARD A strong board is a prerequisite for a successful fundraising program. Strong, effective board members attract top level donors and campaign leadership to the USLA. Characteristics of an effective volunteer board:

. Involved and active. . Competent, concerned and available. Able to help the USLA meets its goals in the community through their capacity to give their time and talent. . Informed, ensuring that judgments are based in fact. . Provided adequate staff service. Professional level people are accustomed to having details of their activities facilitated by staff assistants. They expect the same efficiency in their volunteer work. . Assigned major responsibility suited to individual capabilities. . Serving on a rotational basis, serving on project groups and temporary groups to maximize individual volunteer talent. . Recognized for its generosity.

CRITERIA FOR THE VOLUNTEER CHAIR

Criteria for the Campaign Chair The Campaign Chair should be a USLA member who is enthusiastic about the USLA and the campaign, able to lead meetings/conference calls and to motivate people, and willing to devote the required time. Regardless of that person’s status as the individual must command the respect and the attention of the Board. The Chair must work closely with the Campaign Director (Executive Director), preside at all meetings of the Campaign Committee and campaign meetings, recruit and supervise the top campaign leadership, carry out the General Plan and, of course, campaign for funds and make a personal contribution.

Characteristics of the Campaign Chair:

. A high level of commitment to success. A dogged determination by campaign leadership to succeed has pulled many campaigns over the finish line. . Enthusiasm for the cause. Fundraising is not second nature for most people. However, a campaign chair’s enthusiasm is infectious, making even the most difficult challenges seem attainable. . Ability and willingness to give at a high level. The campaign chair’s gift is usually the first, and becomes the benchmark for the rest of the campaign. A truly attention-getting commitment can get a campaign effort off to a fast start. . Generosity with his or her time. Campaigns are comprised of meetings/conference calls. . Discipline and accountability. Committing to the proven practices and holding others accountable for following those practices will set an important tone throughout the campaign.

CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE The Campaign Committee (or Project Group) is the volunteer group appointed and commissioned by the USLA’s Board (President) and is accountable to the board for a successful annual Support Campaign.

United States Lifesaving Association Educational Conference Planning Activity Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Officer: Michael Bradley

Introduction

Education is an important part of the United States Lifesaving Association. In fact, it is through education, national lifeguard standards, training programs, promotion of high levels of lifeguard readiness, and other means that the USLA works to reduce the incidence of death and injury. At the fall 2017 meeting in Vancouver, the USLA voted to change the meeting structure for the fall 2018 meeting in an effort to stimulate growth at Board of Directors Meeting and Educational Conference. In order to achieve growth we, the Board of Directors, need to consider that change is necessary to achieve new heights. Members of the educational conference planning committee are: Michael Bradley, Gerry Falconer, Kyle Maxwell, Stephe McCormick, Rob Edgerton and Kay Smiley.

Activities and Accomplishments (Since Prior Board of Directors Meeting. Include information on how the committee is promoting the Water Safety USA message)

1. Identified goals of the conference: 1.1. To provide a more robust education component to the USLA Board of Directors Meeting and Conference in order to draw new attendees. 1.2. To provide greater opportunity for newcomers to be exposed to the business of the USLA by participating in committee meetings, discussions and social events. Conference Call(s) Summary

1. Discussions on meeting location and needed resources (Mr. Bradley, Mr. Falconer, Ms. Smiley) 2. Discussions on the potential of earning CEUs to maintain certifications. (Mr. Bradley, Mr. Edgerton, Mr. Maxwell, Ms. Smiley)

Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration

1. Identify any policies & procedures that may need to be considered for the purposes of planning. 2. Discuss the details of the host location.

Page 1 of 1 United States Lifesaving Association Social Media Guidelines Activity Report

Date: April 25, 2018 Officer: Tom Gill

Introduction

During the 2017 Fall Meeting there was a spirited meeting regarding Social Media Guidelines for USLA Social Media posts. I again want to thank those who attended and even more those who sent further information following the meeting. Social Media guidelines for municipalities and their departments are incredibly extensive and specific. However we are not a municipality, rather a volunteer organization doing our best to highlight the importance of lifesaving on our beaches, the stories of those lifesavers and other information that will serve to educate both members and the public. Because social media by its nature is so public, it is not in the best interest of the USLA to post stories that serve as negative examples for other lifesavers. While it may be educational, those stories display lifesavers negatively ultimately erodes confidence in the public in the very institutions we are trying to serve and improve.

Activities and Accomplishments (Since Prior Board of Directors Meeting. Include information on how the committee is promoting the Water Safety USA message)

1. Collected handbooks and social media policy guides. 2. Worked on the draft for placement in Policies and Procedures.

Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration

1. Consider the Social Media Guidelines draft and present a final version for inclusion in the Policies and Procedures handbook.

Attachments

1. USLA Social Media Policy (draft)

Page 1 of 1

USLA Social Media Policy

The United States Lifesaving Association is America's nonprofit professional association of beach lifeguards and open water rescuers. The USLA works to reduce the incidence of death and injury in the aquatic environment through public education, national lifeguard standards, training programs, promotion of high levels of lifeguard readiness, and other means.

The USLA recognizes the use of social media as a means to further the mission of USLA in an open and extensively public forum. Because this is a public forum, the use of social media should promote positive, educational and inspirational stories regarding beach safety and the lifesavers who work to protect the swimming public.

Posts that invariably embarrass or shine a negative light on USLA members should be distributed in non- public venues so that members may learn and be made aware of the stories, but airing those stories on public social media posts do nothing to further the mission of USLA nor promote the earned confidence of the public in the highly trained and functioning lifesavers of USLA Certified Agencies.

Thus the following guidelines should be followed by the USLA President and his/her designee in formulating USLA Social Media posts:

1. The President shall designate a limited number of representatives to make or forward posts on behalf of the USLA. 2. All social media posts shall be supervised by the USLA President or representatives appointed by the President. 3. Any posts created by or forwarded by the President of USLA or designated representatives should serve to highlight the following: a. Positive work by members b. Stories of interest in water safety c. Promotion of USLA sponsored or supported events 4. The USLA shall not post or forward stories, items that: a. Reflect negatively upon individual members or agencies b. Interject or promote stories based on employee versus employer contractual issues c. Items whose content are mostly political in nature. d. Promote a personal viewpoint. 5. The USLA reserves the right to remove or delete posts made on USLA social media social media sites that include but are not limited to: a. Posts that use profanities. b. Posts that attack USLA members, policies or the organization. c. Posts of a political nature favoring one entity over another. d. Posts determined to be false or unfounded but presented as fact. 6. The President and designees shall conduct themselves at all times in the best interest of the USLA subject to the bylaws governing member conduct in Article VII, Section 6, and Numbers 1-4.

7. Members that believe a post violates the guidelines set forth should contact their regional leadership or the social media representative to register their complaint and the President or designees will determine if the post should be removed. United States Lifesaving Association Executive Committee Committee Action Report

Date: April 25, 2108 Committee Chair: Peter Davis Committee Members: Peter Davis – President, Mike Beuerlein – Vice President, Nikki Bowie – Secretary, Michael Bradley – Treasurer, Kyle Maxwell – Executive Delegate, Ralph Goto – Advisor, Jerry Gavin for Joe Pecoraro – President - Great Lakes Region, Ed Zebrowski – President – Mid-Atlantic Region, Jim Farrell – President - New England Region, , Kalani Vierra – President - Pacific Islands Region, Tom Gill – President - South Atlantic Region, Gerry Falconer – President - Southeast Region, Bill Humphries – President - Southwest Region, Peter Wernicki – Medical Advisor, Information Items (The following information was provided in writing and/or verbally)

1. Budget

1.1 Budget [Bradley] – Mr. Bradley reported that tax filing is complete for 2017. 1.2 Combined Federal Campaign – Donations received in 2017: $750.55. So far this year we have received $140.96. Ms. Smiley reported that the reporting process has changed for filing and that due to not filing in time in the past, the USLA had fallen off the radar, but we are now back on track. 2. Sponsor Relations 2.1. Da Fin – [Zebrowski]- The most current Da Fin contract exists until August 31, 2021. Contract can be extended with mutual agreement. Total income has been in accordance with the contract. Income from Da Fin since the original contract was signed in 2006 has totaled approximately $40,000, not including ALM ads. ($4,000 in 2016). 2.2. Ingram – [Brewster]- This contract was first signed in 2009 and will now expire December 31, 2021. Income from Ingram since the original contract was signed in 2009 has totaled $40,000 Mr. Brewster negotiated a three year extension to the contract, which was signed in January 2018. $5,000 was paid in February of 2018. 2.3. Eyeking – [Zebrowski]- The most current Eyeking contract extends from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018. Terms were the same as the previous contract. Income from Eyeking since the original contract was signed in 2008 has totaled approximately $40,000. Mr. Zebrowski has worked with the company and has a contract for one year with the same terms as the previous contract. They have also agreed to pay for part of the membership item that will be a buff. Contract was signed last October. They paid $1,500 on 1/02/2018. However, that was for the 4th quarter of 2017. They owe $3,000 for the first and second quarter of 2018. They also owe $500 for an ad in ALM. They owe a total of $3,500 and have been invoiced. 2.4. Prone 2 Paddle- [Zebrowski]- This agreement was approved by the Executive Committee. The contract has been developed and is being reviewed by the USLA attorney. It will be signed once the review is complete. The committee discussed that when giving exclusivity to one particular company you run the risk of upsetting another company. The other side is that exclusivity can be good financially for the USLA. 2.5. Engine – [Zebrowski] - Mr. Zebrowski reported that he has been working with Engine Swimwear who supplied officials’ uniforms at no cost and rash guards for participants at Nationals. Engine would like to become the “Official Swimwear of the USLA” and in exchange they have offered to supply officials’ uniforms at no cost, participants’ rash guards at cost, and to outfit the National teams at no cost for three years. Mr. Zebrowski estimated a value of $15,000-$20,000 for this Page 1 of 4 deal. The representative of Engine did supply Mr. Zebrowski a contract but it has not been returned as of yet. He has spoken with them and there don’t seem to be any issues.

3. Royalties

3.1. ASHI – [Smiley] - A contract with ASHI was approved in September 2014; the contract is now in force. Lifeguard agencies wishing to avail themselves of the favorable rates for first aid, EMR and CPR certification courses they can find details on the USLA website. We receive royalties for purchases by USLA affiliated agencies. The sales between September 2014 and April 23, 2018, totaled $39,149. ASHI reports that the USLA is on track to receive the 15% royalty payment for 2018 and agencies to continue to receive the 20% discount. Four new agencies have signed on with ASHI since January. 3.2. smile.amazon.com – [Bradley]- Amazon provides a percent of sales when customers choose to support the USLA through smile.amazon.com for all their Amazon shopping. Qualifying items purchased provide donations to USLA. Total income for 2017 was: $413.37. Total in 2018 so far is $100.21. We need to brand this better through e-blasts and other promotions. 3.3. Pearson – [Bradley/Brewster]- USLA receives royalties for our textbook sales. The latest edition of the manual generated $4,585.90 in royalties in 2017. Lifetime income from all three editions is $33,307. 3.4. DVD Sales (via UniServ) - [Bradley]- We have received $10,006.78 in overall in sales proceeds since sales began. Our cost for DVDs has totaled $6,994.49. We have over 800 titles of each DVD in stock. For 2017 we received $861.12. We recently received a request from Marine Rescue Products to sell the videos and sold them to the company for $15 each. They will resell at the same price that we do - $25 each. 3.5 Office Depot – [Bradley] - A contact was signed in March 23, 2012. USLA receives a 1.5% donation on total sales from Office Depot/Office Max. The contract was signed in March 23, 2012. We received $89.04 in 2016 and $75.88 in 2017. So far in 2018 we have received $0. Like Amazon Smile, this in another means of supporting the USLA that we need to showcase to our members.

4. Nationals 2017 [Zebrowski, Bradley] – Mr. Zebrowski stated that Daytona Beach was a great venue and the competition was very well organized. Mr. Bradley reported that the competition itself made $11,000; the Lifesaving Sport total budget was $3,000 under budget. After the competition there are still some other expenses that come out of that line including the National Team donation of $14,000 and the money that comes out of registration for the National Team and the U19 Team. The competition is a great revenue generator for the USLA, but we need it to generate more money in the shape of a major sponsor.

5. Nationals 2018, 2019 [Zebrowski] – Mr. Zebrowski reported that everyone is in agreement on the contract and they just need to sign the contract with VA Beach. Due to the donation of $20,000 from the City of Virginia Beach, we are already close to $30,000 profit of the National games. Jersey Mike’s wants to be the title sponsor and their deal is to provide 4800 tote bags, hats and coupon for a free Jersey Mike’s sandwich for the USLA membership. In addition they will be providing $25,000 worth of funding. The value of the items for the membership kit is approximately $24,000 worth of goods for the 2018 membership kit. Mr. Zebrowski believes that going through a visitor bureau is the way for the USLA to make a profit. Mr. Brewster reminded the committee that there is an application on the website if any agencies want to submit a proposal to host the National Games.

6. National Weather Service – Sea Grant – USLA Collaboration [Brewster, Davis] - Mr. Brewster and Mr. Davis have continued to attend to this relationship, which has endured for over a decade. This included conference calls, review of videos, etc. Currently working to revise the material based on public input and to bring the NOAA and USLA websites in sync. Most of this work is complete and a new graphic and revised content should be released shortly. Additionally, currently working on a rip

Page 2 of 4 current video for the deaf and hearing impaired. Script is finished and is reportedly in the production phase. One of the big change will be instead of saying “Don’t panic” the phrase will be “relax and float”.

7. California Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor [Davis/Brewster] – The President appointed Mr. Williams as the USLA representative. Nominations are to be submitted by April 28th. USLA has promoted the opportunity for nominations by making sure the California agencies are aware of this opportunity and the Liaison Officer and Information Technology Chair will get the word out to individual California members of USLA.

8. Water Safety USA- [Brewster, Davis] – In 2014, the USLA, the American Red Cross and the YMCA of the USA proposed a national collaboration of water safety and drowning prevention organizations. That brought about the founding of Water Safety USA, a group comprised of 14 respected government and non-government organizations. Mr. Brewster presently acts as moderator of the group, handling leadership duties. Since November, the group has met bi-monthly by conference call and is preparing to issue a new safety message for the coming year which addresses the importance of “Water Competence”. Mr. Brewster reported that the group has a desire to create a national water safety plan for the entire United States.

9. USLA Committee Chair Appointments- [Davis]- Mr. Davis, with the help of Mr. Beuerlein, created a document that will serve as a guide for how Mr. Davis made appointments of new committee chairs (Attachment 2). This is not a binding document or a proposed changed to the Bylaw, rather an explanation of how Mr. Davis made his decisions.

10, USLA-NJ Certification – Mr. Davis and Mr. Zebrowski worked with the group in New Jersey to bring the different groups that are certified as USLA-NJ into the USLA certification process. The USLA-NJ certification has existed longer that the USLA formal certification and some of the New Jersey State requirements differ from USLA requirements. The goal is to allow dual certification without contradicting USLA-NJ standards. As agencies recertify, they would be given dual certification and the certification officers for USLA-NJ would also be part of a subcommittee and do the work as certification officers for USLA and include whatever additional state requirements that are required.

11. Executive Director Contract [Davis] - Per the November 2015 action of the Board, the contract was updated, reviewed by the Legal Advisor, and signed at the last meeting. It is in effect until December 31st, 2018.

12. Meeting Restructure Proposal- [Bradley] Mr. Bradley stated that the committee established the following goals: to provide a more robust education component to the USLA Board of Directors meeting and conference in order to draw in new attendees; to provide rare opportunity for new- comers to be exposed to the business of the USLA by participating in committee meetings, discussions and social events. Mr. Bradley then updated the committee as to how planning for the educational component of the Fall Meeting in Florida is progressing. The committee would like to spread the committee meetings and education sessions throughout the week and maybe have different tracks such as one that focuses specifically on aquatic rescues while the other track could focus on the other elements of the job. Mr. Falconer expressed concern over the proposed schedule and how that may affect extra rooms needed during the week. He also opined that extending the education conference would require a change to the Policies and Procedures. Mr. Bradley said that the group would make a proposal after they meet to suspend that Policy for the Fall meeting.

13. Executive Director Report [Smiley] - Ms. Smiley gave an overview of her work since the last meeting. She reported that she performed over 35 different tasks and that she has had contact and assisted with most committees, with a large amount of time going towards the Certification Committee. Mr. Beuerlein and Mr. Bradley both thanked Kay for the volume and quality of her work. Page 3 of 4

14. MAR Meeting Organization Proposal- [Zebrowski]- Mr. Zebrowski presented a proposal for meeting planning and organization on behalf of the Mid-Atlantic Region that would have the USLA organize the Board of Directors meetings while maintaining the current regional rotation. This would include sending out hotel RFPs and handling the details of putting on the meeting. Mr. Beuerlein shared that in the Southwest Region they offer the option that whoever is hosting the regional meeting can front all the costs themselves or they can have assistance from their regional treasury. This might be beneficial with some of the smaller regions of the USLA, where the larger regions may choose to host on their own. Mr. Bradley stated that there are real advantages to being able to plan several years out and securing hotels and long term relationships with sponsors. In addition, having a central person or group of people to organize the meeting would lend itself to consistency. Mr. Falconer believes the regions should have the autonomy to select and the have the ability where they want the meeting for specific purposes such as going to an area that would be exposed to lifesaving. Mr. Brewster made a motion seconded by Mr. Pryor “The National body will be responsible for organizing future Board of Directors meetings unless a region states that they would prefer to organize it themselves”. Motion passed with 5 opposed – Pacific Islands, Advisor, Southwest, Vice President, and Southeast.

15. Additional items The Executive Committee convened to Executive Session discuss three additional items: 15.1 Executive Director Review [Davis] - Under the bylaws, the Executive Director acts, “… at the direction of the Executive Committee under the supervision of the President.” The President will report to the Executive Committee on this relationship for discussion and direction. 15.2 EC Voting- [Davis/More] - Mr. Davis will give a review of discussions related to having one board member carry two or more votes. Mr. More has given a legal determination that this is not allowed under our bylaws, therefore each EC member can only carry one vote (attachment 1). 15.3 Board Communication [Davis] - EC members were invited to participate in a discussion related to communication and efficiency of the Executive Committee.

Adjournment

Page 4 of 4 United States Lifesaving Association Bylaws Committee Committee Action Report

Date: April 28, 2018 Committee Chair: Mike Wagner Committee Members: Gerry Falconer, Southeast Ralph Goto, Pacific Islands Casey Graham, Southwest Tony Prior, Gulf Coast Ralph Wagner, South Atlantic Ed Zebrowski II, Mid Atlantic

Discussion Items (Not requiring Board of Directors approval)

1. Discussed the tie-breaking process for elections and opted not to take action to deviate from Robert’s Rules of Order. 2. Discussed whether the USLA position statement not supporting the deployment of lifeguard rescue devices for use by the public should be added to the bylaws. Committee recommends that USLA.org adds a section on position statements rather than adding it to the Policies and Procedures. 3. Discussed and approved policy proposals from the Lifesaving Sport and Social Media committees.

Committee Goals

1. The committee will come up with language addressing signing contracts, specifically the roles of the President and Secretary and whether or not notarization is needed. (Bylaws Article VIII, Section 4 G1b) 2. The committee will work with the Legal Advisor to clarify his opinion that an Executive Board members cannot: a) Vote more than 1 time if he or she is also the President of a region. (Bylaws Article VIII, Section 4 B3) b) Appoint a designee to vote as President of his/her region if he/she is in attendance and voting as a member of the Executive Board. (Bylaws Article VIII, Section 4 B1and B3)

Page 1 of 1 United States Lifesaving Association National Certification Committee Action Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Committee Chair: B. Chris Brewster, Chair; Tony Pryor, Vice-Chair Committee Members: New England – None, Mid-Atlantic – Ed Kizuikiewicz, South Atlantic – Mike Wagner, Southeast – Gerry Falconer, Gulf Coast – Tony Pryor, Southwest – Mike Silvestri, Northwest – David Robinson, Great Lakes – None, Pacific Islands – Ralph Goto

Attendees: Timothy Harmon, Kay Smiley, Tony Sholl, Scott Hansson, Monty Reed, Dave Foxwell, Brian Etnyre, Duke Brown, Ralph Wagner, Jim Hughes, Buzz Mogck, Rick Gould. Committee Goals:

1. PRWC: Finalize certification program. 2. New Jersey: Finalize a program to begin certification. 3. Certifications: Promote and accept certifications and recertifications 4. Additional: Address all issues noted in the discussion and action item lists. Discussion Items (Not requiring Board of Directors approval)

1. PRWC Training: In October 2017, the Board approved some substantial work by the PRWC Training Working Group to create standards for PRWC training. The next step is to transform this to a system whereby the USLA can certify. Working Group Chair Kai Bond and I began discussing this process in January. In March a comprehensive approach was agreed upon in principle, in which the PRWC training programs of lifeguard agencies would be certified in a manner like the lifeguard agency certification program. The cost is to be determined, although a figure of $500 was cited by those proposing this certification project. We will be able to offer course completion cards like those we currently offer lifeguard agencies for lifeguards who have been trained. Some things we are lacking now are minimum training hours (operator and crewmember), minimum standards for course instructors, standards for crewmember training, and any required post-training experience that may be required prior to considering a person fully trained. These are a few key examples. Mr. Bond has a more comprehensive list. Once these are addressed, we should be able to create an online application for agencies and begin certifying. 2. Kelly Slater Wave Co.: This company has contacted the USLA to ask if we would certify them if they meet our training standards. The committee agreed on a vote of six yes and one no (Mr. Falconer) to advise them that if they apply and meet standards we would recommend certification. 3. Junior Lifeguard Training: An inquiry was discussed regarding whether junior lifeguard training should be allowed to be used as credit toward regular lifeguard training. The committee is not in favor of this. 4. Oxnard College Lifeguard Program: The committee was informed of a new college level lifeguard training program in Oxnard, California that involves 90 hours of training in addition to medical aid and CPR. 5. Beach Vehicle Operations Program: The committee agreed that once the PRWC program is complete, the committee should begin work on a beach vehicle operations program.

Page 1 of 4 6. Epilepsy: American Lifeguard Magazine recently included an article referencing two on-duty deaths of lifeguards attributed to epilepsy and one epileptic seizure that led to reassignment of the person to non-safety duties. The committee agreed to recommend that the Medical Committee include a recommendation for some level of screening in the USLA Recommended Medical Exams if this is lawfully permissible. The chair will investigate this question and report back to the committee. 7. Resources: The Resource Materials section of the LACP guidelines currently includes several titles that may need review/update. A subcommittee led by Tony Pryor, including Tim Harmon and Duke Brown, will review these materials and make recommendations for updates to the committee. 8. CPR and Emergency Medical Responder Courses: There are three CPR courses and two Emergency Medical Responder courses known to fully comply with USLA requirements. To further assist agencies, we will advise applying agencies that these courses are “preapproved.” 8.1. ARC: CPR for Healthcare Providers 8.2. AHA: BLS Provider (Basic Life Support) 8.3. ASHI: Basic Life Support, BLS for Healthcare Providers and Professional Rescuers 8.4. ARC: Emergency Medical Response 8.5. ASHI: Emergency Medical Response 9. Minimum Medical Aid Course: From inception of the Lifeguard Agency Certification Program, the USLA has required the following as a minimum for hourly personnel: “Certified as having successfully completed a medical aid course accepted by the Federal Government or by the state government in the state of employment. Total formal medical aid training, including the certified medical aid course (but not the CPR course), shall be no less than 21 hours.” The 21-hour standard was based on a California course for public safety personnel (Title 22). Currently, there are several first aid courses shorter than Emergency Medical Response that come close to the 21-hour standard. Examples include: ARC Responding to Emergencies Adult and Pediatric First Aid/CPR/AED (30 hrs.); ARC First Aid for Public Safety Personnel 15.5-17 hrs.); and ASHI Advanced First Aid (17 hours). We are however, seeing some agencies using very short courses which are not intended for public safety personnel, some as short as 2.5 hours, which they then supplement with onsite supplemental training, but recertification appears to be limited to the short course. The committee intends to identify specific courses for public safety personnel that will be brought for approval at the next meeting and to recommend these at a minimum for future applications. 10. First Aid Training Pre-Assignment: Since the inception of the USLA Lifeguard Agency Certification Program we have required that all medical aid and CPR training must be complete before the lifeguard is given any assignment on the beach. At the request of some agencies, we modified the guidelines to include a trainee category. We have stated since we created that category as follows in the guidelines, “Medical aid and CPR training must be given and the swim standard met before the lifeguard is given any assignment on the beach. The remaining training must be provided within 30 calendar days from the first day of deployment of the lifeguard.” During the application screening process, an agency recently advised that they do not meet this standard and proposed modification to our standards to accommodate them. The committee considered this and there was no support for modifications.

Page 2 of 4 Action Items (Requiring Board of Directors approval)

1. ARRT: The committee unanimously recommends to the Board the following changes to the ARRT guidelines: “3.5. Medical Aid and CPR Certification -- Must be certified as having successfully completed a medical aid course equivalent to U.S. Department of Transportation First Emergency Medical Responder, Emergency Medical Technician, or paramedic.” 2. Manual: The committee unanimously recommends to the Board the following changes to the LACP guidelines: “A copy of the third edition of Open Water Lifesaving – The United States Lifesaving Association Manual (2017) must be available to each trainee.” Note: The online application will be updated to reflect the requirement. It is not presently mentioned in the application. 3. Lesson Plans: The committee unanimously recommends to the Board the following changes to the LACP guidelines: “1.3 Agencies are encouraged to utilize the lesson plans provided by the United States Lifesaving Association. In developing course curriculum, the The Resource Material section may also be of assistance.” 4. Manual (2): The committee unanimously recommends to the Board the following changes to the LACP guidelines in the Resource Materials section: “The Open Water Lifesaving – The United States Lifesaving Association Manual, Third Edition United States Lifesaving Association, B. Chris Brewster - Editor, ISBN 0-536-73735-5 1-323-58456-0. 5. Certification Processing: The committee unanimously recommends to the Board the following update to the LACP guidelines: “1.5. The USLA Secretary Executive Director or designee will review the application for completeness, consult with the Chair of the Certification Committee, work with the applying agency to address any shortcomings, file one copy and then send the second a copy to a Certification Officer from the USLA region in which the agency lies. The Secretary Executive Director or designee will attempt to choose a Certification Officer who is geographically close to the applicant, but who is not employed or affiliated with the applicant. 1.6. Within sixty (60) thirty (30) days of receiving an application (sooner in urgent circumstances), the Certification Officer is responsible for conducting a thorough review and submitting written findings. The review must include, at a minimum, checking all documents submitted and ensuring that they show the agency to be in compliance with the current guidelines of USLA, at either the minimum or advanced level. It is also suggested, but not required, that an on-site review be conducted for most agencies. An on-site review is required for newly established agencies. 1.7. Upon receiving the written findings of a Certification Officer, the Secretary Executive Director or designee will file a copy of the findings and forward a copy to the Certification Committee Chair for review by the National Certification Committee. This committee, which normally meets in May and November in conjunction with the Board of Directors, is responsible for recommending approval or disapproval to the Board, with final approval requiring a majority vote of the full Board. In cases in which an applying agency fails to meet the necessary deadlines for application and can demonstrate that it would be prevented from operating as a result of a delay in approval until the next Board of Directors meeting, the Certification Chair, in consultation with the President, may provisionally certify an agency found to meet all requirements until the next Board of Directors meeting, at which time the Board of Directors shall approve or disapprove the application.” 6. Swim Fins: Under current LACP certification guidelines, agencies are not required to have swim fins available for search and rescue, but only mask and snorkel. The committee agreed on a vote of six yes and one no (Mr. Wagner) to recommend to the Board a

Page 3 of 4 modification of the equipment guidelines as follows: “8.1.2. Mask(s), and snorkel(s), and swim fins readily accessible to mount an underwater search and rescue, as appropriate.” The current guidelines require training in the use of swim fins, but the certification application states, “Demonstrate the donning and use of swim fins in rescue, if swim fins are used by agency.” The application will be changed to reflect the requirements of the guidelines and the phrase, “if swim fins are used by agency,” will be deleted. 7. CPR: The committee unanimously recommends to the Board the following update to the LACP guidelines: “Currently certified as having successfully completed a course in providing one person adult, two person adult, child and infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), including obstructed airway training, AED, BVM, and use of barrier devices, accepted by the Federal Government or by the state government in the state of employment (basic life support for healthcare providers).” Attachments

1. Applications for Board of Directors Approval

Page 4 of 4 Seasonal Type of Certification ROF Applications for Board Approval or Year- Region Certification Officer Completed Round

1. American Medical Response / AMR River Rescue Seasonal Advanced Dan McCormick Yes NW 2. Bethany Beach Patrol, DE Seasonal Advanced Tom Perry Yes MA 3. Brevard County Fire Ocean Rescue, FL Y/R Advanced Joe McManus Yes SE 4. Carolina Beach Ocean Rescue, NC Seasonal Regular Duke Brown Yes SA 5. Clearwater Beach Patrol, FL Y/R Regular Joe McManus Yes SE 6. Dewey Beach Patrol, DE Seasonal Regular Tom Perry Yes MA 7. Fenwick Island Beach Patrol, DE Seasonal Regular Tom Perry Yes MA 8. Galveston Island Beach Patrol, TX Y/R Advanced Kim Tyson Yes GC 9. Golden Gate National Recreation Area (NPS), CA Seasonal Regular Dan McCormick Yes SW 10. Hawaii Fire Department Ocean Safety Division, HI Y/R Regular Ralph Goto Yes PI 11. Imperial Beach Lifeguard Service, CA Y/R Advanced Vince Lombardi Yes SW 12. Kauai Fire Department Ocean Safety Bureau, HI Y/R Regular Ralph Goto Yes PI 13. Maui Ocean Safety (County of), HI Y/R Regular Ralph Goto Yes PI 14. Mexico Beach Fire Rescue, FL (New Agency) NEW ARRT Wil Spivey Yes SE 15. Nags Head Ocean Rescue, NC Seasonal Advanced Duke Brown Yes SA 16. Ocean City Beach Patrol, NJ (New Agency) Seasonal Regular Buzz Mogck Yes MA 17. Okaloosa County - Beach Safety Div., FL Y/R Regular Joe McManus Yes SE 18. Palm Beach County Ocean Rescue, FL Y/R Regular Jim McCrady Yes SE 19. Pismo Beach Lifeguards, City of, CA Seasonal Regular Rick Gould Yes SW 20. Port Hueneme, City of, CA Seasonal Regular Rick Gould Yes SW 21. Santa Cruz/Central Fire Protection Dist.CA (New Agency) Y/R ARRT Rick Gould Yes SW 22. Sea Bright ARRT (New Agency) Seasonal ARRT Ed Kiziukiewicz Yes MA 23. Sea Bright Beach Patrol, NJ Seasonal Regular Ed Kiziukiewicz Yes MA 24. Sea Girt Beach Patrol, NJ Seasonal Regular Ed Kiziukiewicz Yes MA 25. Town of Emerald Isle Fire Dept. (New Agency) Seasonal Regular Duke Brown Yes SA 26. Ventura County Fire Protection District, CA Y/R ARRT Rick Gould Yes SW 27. Wrightsville Beach Ocean Rescue, NC Y/R Advanced Duke Brown Yes SA 28. YMCA Camp Surf, CA Seasonal Regular Vince Lombardi Yes SW Mauna Kea Beach Hotel, HI — Six-month extension to update Y/R Regular Unassigned No PI 29. policies to reflect current practice and USLA requirements. San Diego Lifeguard Service, CA — Approve subject to Y/R Advanced Unassigned No SW 30. favorable review by Certification Officer. Pompano Beach Ocean Rescue, FL — Approve subject to modification of policy to require American Red Cross 31. Emergency Medical Responder course as a minimum, evidence Y/R Regular Unassigned No SE that all lifeguards are trained to that level at a minimum, and favorable review by Certification Officer.

United States Lifesaving Association Heroic Acts, Awards, Recognition, and Presentations Committee Action Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Committee Chair: Adrienne Groh, Vice-Chair and Advisor Bill Richardson, Vice-Chair Kara Harrison Committee Members: Jerry Gavin, GL; Bob Moore, SW; Andy Healey, MA; Jim McCrady, SE; Ralph Wagner, SA; Tony Pryor, GC; Kyle Maxwell, NW;

Introduction

The committee thoroughly enjoyed the meeting in Long Beach. Mike Beuerlein, Bill Humphries and the entire SW went above and beyond to host an incredible meeting which was both productive and educational. The committee was thrilled to be able to honor 4 deserving recipients with awards in person during an emotional and inspiring ceremony. Lance Dempsey received a USLA Heroic Act, Matt Rhodes a USLA and CSLSA Medal of Valor, and in honor of deployed Danny Black, his mother and wife accepted a USLA Heroic Act and CSLSA Medal of Valor. Rick Gould was presented the National Award for Professional Achievement for his tireless years of service to the USLA. This was an example of one of the finest and inspirational activities we participate in as a committee and an association. As extra special thank you goes to Bill Richardson who not only coordinated the presentation, contacted the recipients and families, but also created the beautiful awards.

Discussion Items (Not requiring Board of Directors approval)

1. The committee discussed the importance for agency and association participation in the National Awards Program. It showcases the hard work of lifeguard associations and promotes the significance of lifeguards in the community to city administrators. 2. The committee discussed AART certified agencies and which awards they would be eligible for. AART agencies do submit statistics but are not certified as a basic or advanced agency and this precludes them from eligibility in the National Awards Program. There are other awards that the USLA provides for recognition and achievement, and AART certified chapters are encouraged to submit applications to their particular region for review. 3. The committee created a subcommittee to create a narrative to submit to ALM for MOV recipients as well as other award recipients. Our goal will be to submit the most recent recipients to Karissa Ickes for the website 4. The committee has an award for incremental years of service for officials. Mr. Richardson came up with the amazing design and, the committee will be reaching out to regional presidents immediately, as well as the competition committee to create an accurate list of names. The timing coincides with the 30th anniversary of lifesaving sport and will be presented in Virginia Beach in August. 5. The committee will continue to work with the website coordinator to showcase award recipients on social media. We will not only recognize the heroic act but promote participation in the program and the USLA. 6. The SW region has created a CSLSA Medal of Valor category for non-lifeguard/military/ public safety individuals or group for rescues that are extraordinary and put their lives in danger during the event. In committee, it was discussed to create a new category that would be available for non- lifeguard/military/public safety on the national level similar to the MOV created by the CSLSA. There were two options presented; 1. MOV for non-lifeguard/military/public safety 2. Heroic Act with Valor. These two options need to be discussed at regional meetings and brought back to the fall meeting with a recommendation for discussion and vote. Page 1 of 2 Committee Goals

1. The goal that has been assigned to the Heroic Acts committee states “Encourage and promote recognition of volunteers' efforts to the wider community and external stakeholders and increase recognition members' efforts". The committee plans to accomplish this by utilizing the Award of Merit which was “Created to give due recognition to those persons USLA members or non- members who have contributed substantially to the USLA”. It was discussed that this award can be expanded to include recognition of member retirement, years of service to the USLA, etc. 2. The Committee would like to have a recommendation and vote on a new category of MOV for non- lifeguards. 3. The committee will continue to update the USLA website with all of the MOV recipients in the history of USLA on the website. This will require close coordination with the website coordinator. 4. The committee will present incremental officials awards in August and work to sustain a list for posterity.

Action Items (Requiring Board of Directors approval) Submissions

1. Lt Gray Lt. Holloway, LG Loop, LG Lowndes, LG Ryle, LG Shahan, LG Torres, SE, National Lifesaving Award. 2. Lt. Dustin Lightsey, SE, Meritorious Act 3. Andy Garcias Montes, Javier Mayor, Kevin Stockhuasen, Andrew Valasquez, Jose Ames, SE, National Lifesaving Award 4. Sam Ruskin, SE, Heroic Act 5. James Stanton, SW, Heroic Act

Attachments

1. Click here to list attachments or, if none, delete this section and header

Page 2 of 2 United States Lifesaving Association Junior Guards Action Report

Date: 4-26-2018 Officer: David Robinson

Introduction

We opened the meeting with a brief popcorn style discussion about why we are passionate about the Junior Lifeguard Programs and why we are a part of this committee. Some reasons included: Recruitment for Lifeguard positions, knowledge transfers, joy of working with kids, were past JGs and love being a part of the programs, making kids water proof and water safe kids.

New Business

1. The committee reviewed a letter from a parent on ideas that could better the National Junior Lifeguard program. We discussed opportunities to increase and retain membership. Ideas that were entertained: a. Increasing agency participation and payment b. Grass roots efforts This discussion led to the benefit of the JG program and the limitations of the committee and the National to broadcast those benefits to the Junior Guard Programs. Ideas to increase or better market the benefit of the JG program include: a. Better website b. Participation in social media c. Quarterly email blast d. Timeliness of receiving the membership benefit e. Better and increased gear/swag We discussed a potential partnership with John Wayne or another to develop a USLA Junior Lifeguard ball cap or other gift that would only be given to JG members. We additionally discussed standards which we have already created, the gold, silver and bronze levels of Junior Guard and how we could leverage these levels with membership to better represent members. The committee finally discussed a National community service program and cadet program that could be merged with a USLA membership program and what that would look like in the future.

2. The committee will continue to have a summer bumper sticker/artwork contest but the Region that hosts the Fall meeting will provide both an ALM article and a piece of artwork for the membership gift. This will be the South East Region this fall.

3. The committee had a brief round table to continue discussion on what we could do to increase membership and highlight the importance of the program.

Page 1 of 2 4. The committee is soliciting another 1-2 vice chairs to replace Michael Johnson who has resigned. The chair will be reaching out to the committee members to solicit interest.

4. The committee agreed to go back to their agencies and regions to see if an increase in membership would decrease their agency participation in paying for Junior Guard members. The committee also agreed to create a list of benefits from their regions and National for the Junior Guards.

5. The committee would also like to request a full 2 hour meeting in the future.

Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration

1. Brian Murphy made three motions regarding National Junior Lifeguard competitions. They all approved unanimously to be reviewed by Lifeguard Sport. 1.1. Substitute rescue tubes for rescue cans in Rescue Race 1.2. Eliminate the 5 person swim relay and add a 3-person surf team race 1.3. Add a 3-person board relay

Page 2 of 2 United States Lifesaving Association Lifesaving Sport Committee Action Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Committee Chair: Ed Zebrowski, III Committee Members: Kalani Vierra, Kyle Maxwell, Ed Zebrowski, Jr., Jim McCrady, Jay Butki, Bob Bertrand, Chad Motz, Art Hurtado, Jerry Gavin

Introduction

The chair would like to thank all those that participated in discussions that were orderly and productive, especially the non-committee members that added valuable insights from their positions.

Discussion Items (Not requiring Board of Directors approval)

1. Reviewed the upcoming 2018 National Championships 2. Reviewed the 2017 ISRC where the National Team placed third. 2019 set for South Africa. Exploring possibilities of US hosting 2021. 3. Received updates from National Team management including upcoming SANYO Lifesaving Cup and Lifesaving World Championships. 4. Received updates on ILS activities including proposal to double size of National Teams, 2020 LWC in Italy and new events. ILS has set goal of having a Lifesaving Sport event in the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles, CA. Committee Goals

1. Rule Book short term: correct discrepancies and clarify immediate issues prior to summer. Long term: a comprehensive reevaluation of our rule book, P & P’s, etc. to be submitted by the fall for spring 2019 Action. 2. Sport Development: gathering information from a multitude of sources including surveys, other sport federations and internal examinations of Championship operations. 3. Establish and implement early notifications to members regarding craft scrutineering, eligibility requirements and sportsmanship expectations for National Championships. 4. Research and implement an event pre-registration system.

Action Items (Requiring Board of Directors approval)

1. Policy and Procedure VII-K change proposed by Southwest, passed committee 5-4. (PI, NW, SW, SE, GC in favor; SA, MA, GL, NE opposed). 2. Southwest proposed to explore methodology to develop a USLA Lifesaving Sport Athletes Committee: Committee would provide athlete representation and a voice on issues related to Lifesaving competition as is required by all NGB’s in IOC sports. Motion passed unanimously. Attachments

1. Rule Change proposals from Southwest and Southeast Regions. 2. Policy & Procedure change proposed by Southwest Region regarding National Team Manager selection. Page 1 of 1 Southeast rule change proposals and recommendations

1. Add Singles Row 2. Add paddleboard relay 3. Landline victim must swim out and dip the flag. 4. Competitors be allowed to officiate on days they’re not competing 5. Officials be compensated by the number of days officiating.

Explore possible beach sprint and women landline, for future consideration.

2018 CSLSA Southwest Region USLA Lifesaving Sport Committee Rule Change Proposals

1. Eliminate the rule that if you propose a new event it must replace an existing event.

2. Propose to add the ILS 3-person Paddleboard Relay for both Open Men & Open Women. The Paddleboard Relay event motion successfully passed in the Lifesaving Sport Committee in both 2008 and 2015 but was overturned in voting on the floor by Board of Directors actions. If an event must be replaced it would be the RSR which is very similar to the Ironguard (Run Swim Paddle) & to the Surf Race. USLA is one of only three surf nations that has a Run Swim Run as part of its Nationals events program.

3. Explore methodology to add a Mixed Surfboat Race -1 male rower & 1 female rower- row 2 laps of the Surfboat apex course. Maximum of 4 Mixed Surfboat teams per chapter

4. Explore methodology to add USLA / ILS Board Rescue and the USLA / ILS Tube Rescue Race to the Masters in the future. Maximum of 4 teams per chapter per age group. Master’s Board Rescue & Master’s Rescue Race events were part of the USLA Masters Competition at USLA Nationals up until 2007. As Rescues are what we as Lifeguards do these 2 Rescue events are at the core of our profession and all age groups should contest these events fairly with their peers.

Proposal motions made and passed in USLA JG Committee:

1. Substitute rescue tubes for rescue cans in A, B, C Rescue Race for safety (U19 & LG already use Rescue Tubes in Rescue Race)

2. Change 5-person Swim Relay to 3-person Surf Teams 1 team per chapter per age group per gender Creates SAFER, more efficient event Time saved can be used to introduce new events…

3. Add ILS style 3-person Board Relay for all age groups U19, A,B,C 1 team per chapter per age group per gender Provides more opportunity for board-specific athletes

Motion 1: Motion to amend the current USLA Policy for National Team’s Manager & Coaches. Current policy is vague, and processes, procedures and qualifications are undefined. Proposal language was discussed in Executive Committee in Brewster, Mass. Spring 2017 USLA BoD meeting. Current Policy: Number: VII-K Adopted: 11/03/07 Authority: BOARD RESOLUTION

SUBJECT: USLA NATIONAL TEAM COACH & MANAGER APPOINTMENTS The USLA Team Manager and Coach shall be appointed by the USLA President and confirmed by the Board of Directors as necessary. Proposed Policy: Number: VII-K Adopted: 11/03/07; Amended 4/29/17 Authority: BOARD RESOLUTION

SUBJECT: USLA NATIONAL TEAM MANAGER AND COACH APPOINTMENTS These policy and procedures are intended to define the process for the selection of USLA National Team Managers and Coaches. A. SELECTION COMMITTEE 1. The USLA President shall appoint a selection committee comprised of three USLA Board of Directors to accept and review USLA National Team Manager and Coach position applications. 2. The USLA National Team Manager and Coach Selection Committee shall announce if any or all applicants will be interviewed for open positions. B. APPLICATIONS 1. Individuals who apply for any USLA National Team Manager or Coach positions must be current USLA dues paying members. 2. No application for any USLA National Team Manager or Coach positions will be accepted after the established application deadline. C. INTERVIEWS 1. The USLA National Team Manager and Coach Selection Committee shall interview the top applicants or all applicants depending on the announced process. D. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The USLA National Team Manager and Coach Selection Committee shall recommend individuals to serve as USLA National Team Managers and Coaches to the USLA President based on a review of all applications submitted by the established deadline and any interviews conducted by the selection committee. E. APPOINTMENT 1. The USLA President shall appoint USLA National Team Managers or Coaches considering the recommendations of the USLA National Team Manager and Coach Selection Committee following these policies and procedures. F. BACKGROUND CHECKS 1. All USLA National Team Manager and Coach appointments will be subject to passing a background check as determined by the USLA President.

Motion 2: Explore methodology to develop a USLA Lifesaving Sport Athletes Committee: Committee would provide athlete representation and a voice on issues related to Lifesaving competition as is required by all NGBs in IOC sports. For example: The California Surf Lifesaving Association Lifesaving Sport Athletes Committee consists of current and former lifesaving sport athletes who act as liaison between the CSLSA Lifesaving Sport committee and the athletes of the California counties to ensure that the athletes have representation and a voice in the lifesaving sport decision making process.

USLA Lifesaving Sport Committee Expectations: The powers, duties and expectations of the LSAC are: 1) To act as subject matter experts and bring Lifeguard athletes experience, ideas, knowledge and energy to the USLA. 2) To assist and advise with selection of coaches and athletes who will be invited to participate in selected competitions. 3) To collaborate with LSC Chair(s) on proposals to bring to the United States Lifesaving Association Board of Directors meetings. 4) To bring issues and concerns to the attention of the Lifesaving Sport committee and the larger USLA. Representation: The LSAC is an odd number to ensure a majority vote – so would consist of 5 or 7 or 9 total representatives, at least 1 should be from each gender. Committee would be democratically elected by their peers, which could be achieved on a ballot that would be part of Nationals registration.

United States Lifesaving Association Public Education Committee Action Report

Date: April 26, 2018 Committee Chair: Denise Blair Committee Members: Great Lakes: Jerry Gavin, Gulf Coast: Peter Davis Mid Atlantic: Andy Healy, Pacific Northwest David Robinson, Pacific Islands: Ralph Goto, South Atlantic: Mike Wagner, Southeast: Jo Wagenhals, Southwest: Mike Silvestri

Introduction

I would like to thank everyone who attended the committee meeting. A huge thank you to the committee vice chairs: Mike Silvestri and Rob Edgerton for all their help and support.

Discussion Items (Not requiring Board of Directors approval)

1. Water Safety USA: Chris Brewster updated the committee on Water Safety USA New Safety Tip coming out in May: Become Water Competent Chris also discussed the creation of a national water safety plan. Chris suggested that we review our current safety tips and revise to include the Water Safety USA tips. Chris Brewster, Denise Blair, Peter Davis, Mike Silvestri, Rob Edgerton and the regional representatives will work on this project over the next six months.

2. Beach Safety Challenge: The committee voted to continue hosting the National Beach Safety Challenge. The committee is asking that any agency, chapter or region that does a program on beach safety to submit a written description and pictures by July 15, 2018. The online submission form is available on the website. 3. Grants: The committee spent a bulk of the meeting time reviewing and voting on the grant submissions. Mike Silvestri presented the submissions. We received grant submissions from Ocean Grove Beach Patrol, Sea Bright Ocean Rescue, China Walls, Safety Awareness Project, Corolla SEALS Kid Camp, Manasquan Beach Patrol, Red Shorts Foundation, Huntington Beach Surf Lifesaving Association, Andrew Duff – Ocean City Beach Patrol, Never Off Duty, and Chenango Valley State Park. Discussion followed. There is additional information or revisions needed by two of the grant submissions. Mike Silvestri will contact those two organizations and ask them to make the revisions and resubmit in the fall. The committee voted to approve the following grant submissions: Ocean Grove Beach Patrol will receive a grant of $600 to host a beach safety clinic in late June to go over beach safety essentials with students and parents. Manasquan Beach patrol will receive a grant of $1000 to provide basic water/beach safety and ocean awareness for English Second Language students. The funds will be used to print the USLA activity book “A Fun and Safe Day at the Beach” in Spanish and English.

Page 1 of 2 Huntington Beach Surf Lifesaving Association will receive a grant of $1000 to create educational content to raise awareness about stingrays due to the recent high incidence of stingray related injuries at their beach. Mike Silvestri will notify all of the applicants about their submissions. In the fall, there will be another entry period for the grant program. The deadline for that submission is October 1, 2018. 4. USLA Videos: Jerry Gavin has submitted a thumb drive with two hours of the Heritage Committee Interviews for the History of the USLA video project. The next step in this process is to develop a script for the video. 5. Coloring Books: The committee discussed adding pages with lake and river content to the existing coloring book. After completion, we will discuss printing more coloring books. 6. Website: The committee discussed updating the Public Education section on the website. The committee would like to see a Public Education Button to click on and bring to a dynamic Public Education section. We do have money put aside to do these updates. We will work with Karissa Ickes on this project. 7. Project Wipeout: William Koon gave an update on Project Wipeout. They have established an advisory committee with a representative from each beach patrol agency. They are finalizing a countywide beach safety curriculum. They are also planning Drowning Prevention workshops with parents and caregivers. 8. Water Safety Legislation: Denise Blair gave an update on the status of NJ Bill A-269. 9. Lesson Plans and Curriculum: The committee will continue to work to develop lesson plans and curriculum on beach and water safety. 10. Evaluation: Over the next six months, Ralph Goto, Denise Blair, Mike Silvestri and Rob Edgerton will work on a tool to evaluate our Public Education program.

Committee Goals

1. Website 2. Revising Safety Tips 3. Evaluation Tool 4. Lesson Plans and Curriculum

Page 2 of 2 United States Lifesaving Association Ways & Means Committee Action Report

Date: 4-28-18 Committee Chair: Michael Bradley Committee Members: Mark Allen, SW; Monty Reed, SA; Jim McCray, NW; Bob Bertrand, NE; Jo Wagenhals, SE; Ed Kiziuekewicz, MA; Jerry Gavin, GL; Tony Pryor, GC. Others in attendance: Kyle Maxwell, Jim Farrell, Jim Hughes, Joji Abasolo, Denise Blair

Introduction

Thank you all for being here. I’d like that welcome new regional treasurers and committee chairs.

Discussion Items (Not requiring Board of Directors approval)

1. General USLA financial information 1.1. USLA fiscal year is January 1 – December 31. 1.2. The budget for the upcoming year is approved at the fall Board of Directors meeting. 1.3. Overview of membership dues and the collection of dues. 1.4. Overview of invoices. 1.5. Overview of the USLA website and its use for event registration for national and regional events. 2. Review of 2017 financial data (attached to the committee activity report). 2.1. For 2017 there were a number of outstanding invoices that resulted in shortages in the budget such as membership. Since the close of the 2017 fiscal year, a number of those invoices have been paid and closed. Use of invoices helps with collection of monies owed to the USLA. 2.2. The 2017 audit and tax filing have been completed. 3. Reserve Fund Investment Update (attached to the committee activity report). 3.1. Overview of the 2017 investment process. We began the year by moving reserve funds to the Fidelity account and starting with an amount of $225,000. Investments were made quarterly in accordance with the USLA investment policy. At the close of 2017 the value of USLA reserves was $237,314.60, a change of $12,314.60 in value. Of the change in value, over $2,600 were paid dividends from investments. 4. Review the 2018 budget. 4.1. This time of year involves paying a number of large expenses. 4.2. The 2018 membership drive will soon begin resulting in revenues coming in at a higher rate.

Committee Goals

1. Accept and act on financial requests from board members and other committees. 2. Review and make recommendations to the board on financial matters. 3. Maintain fiscal responsibility for the USLA.

Page 1 of 3 Action Items (Requiring Board of Directors approval)

1. The Heritage Committee requested $500 to reimburse Phil Rogers for the work he has done with the heritage interview project. Motion made by Jo Wagenhals to approve that $500 from Public Education budget be used for the Heritage Committee Film Program. Mark Allen seconded. MPU 2. The USLF has approved a donation of $2,497.53 to the USLA. Ed Kiziuekewicz made a motion to decline the donation from the USLF. Jerry Gavin seconded. MPU 3. Mark Allen made a motion to designate up to $6500 from the National Team Restricted Budget to assist for the Sanyo Team. Bob Bertrand seconded. Discussion followed. Tom Gill stated that the motion is mute because the budget is decided by the National Team Manager and Coaches. Michael Bradley stated that the National Team and the Youth National Team accounts are restricted accounts, and that the teams are responsible for how their money is spent. Mark Allen withdrew his motion. Jerry Gavin seconded it. MPU 4. Mark Allen made a motion that the USLA reimburse the CSLSA $750 to cover the Eye King Sponsor table. Jerry Gavin seconded. MPU 5. Jo Wagenhals made a motion to adjourn. Ed Kiziuekewicz seconded. MPU Attachments

1. General Information & Financial Practices

Page 2 of 3 USLA Ways & Means Financial Practices

The Ways & Means Committee is comprised of the USLA Treasurer (Chair), Regional Treasurers and Committee Chairs. The USLA fiscal year runs January 1st – December 31st. The budget for the upcoming year is approved at the fall Board of Directors meeting.

DUES USLA is a dues driven association. Dues are distributed as follows: 1) Professional Membership $30 $15.00 to USLA, balance to Region 2) Associate Membership $30 $15.00 to USLA, balance to Region 3) Junior Membership $10 $8.00 to USLA, balance to Region 4) Supporting All funds to USLA 5) Perpetual $1,000 $250 to chapter, $250 to Region, $500 to USLA

COLLECTION OF DUES 1) Members register and pay online a. Dues are received by USLA b. Region % distributed quarterly 2) Chapters submit rosters and payment to USLA a. Dues are received by USLA b. Region % distributed immediately c. USLA invoices Chapter 3) Chapters submit rosters and payment to Region a. Dues are received by Region b. USLA % distributed immediately c. USLA invoices Region *Regions are responsible to submit rolls to Membership Chair and Treasurer by October 1st.

INVOICES To insure accurate recording of USLA finances, product sales, monies owed and customer accounts, invoices are used for membership, certification, sponsorship, ALM and event registration. Invoices generated out of QuickBooks Online are set up so that payment can be made by check or cash. However, options are available upon request for payments to be made by credit card.

USLA WEBSITE The USLA website is used for registration of USLA events. Registration through www.usla.org is required for national events such as the Board of Directors Meeting & Education Conference and the National Competition. For required events, all revenues are collected at no fee to the host.

The USLA website may also be used by regions and chapters for registration of events, however they are not required to do so. To offset the expense of credit card processing, a 3% per registration fee will be applied when the host is not required to use the website for registration. 97% of revenue will be sent to the event host.

The USLA website is also used for individual memberships and donation submissions.

Page 3 of 3 United States Lifesaving Association Fund Raising Project Work Group Activity Report

Date: April 28, 2018 Officer: Jim McCray

Introduction

Goal number four “Resources” of the USLA Strategic Plan is to develop and implement a major gift and endowment campaign program. The Project Groups goal will be to outline a plan and set goals and timelines to address USLA fundraising issues

Activities and Accomplishments

1. The Working Group discussed USLA fund raising priorities. The group noted that Pubic Education was generally a top priority of funding for the organization. The specific area for fund raising in public education was not finalized. 2. The group discussed developing a fund raising campaign in an effort to assist the organization. Specifically to group discussed fund raising campaign that included USLA National Board of Director, Membership and Alumni Membership donations. 3. Additional discussion for the working group regarding specific criteria of fund raising activities will reviewed at the fall meeting.

Recommendations for Committee and/or Board Consideration

1. No Actions

Attachments

Page 1 of 1 United States Lifesaving Association Conference Planning Committee Committee Action Report

Date: 4-28-18 Committee Chair: Michael Bradley Committee Members: Present: Gerry Falconer, Rob Edgerton, Kyle Maxwell, Kay Smiley Not Present: Stephe McCormick Others: Tony Pryor, Bob Bertrand

Introduction

The conference planning project group has spent the past few months identifying goals for the conference and working on a format that will meet those goals. We now turn our focus on the content of the fall education conference.

Discussion Items (Not requiring Board of Directors approval)

1. Mr. Falconer gave an update on the Marriott Del Ray. It was discussed and agreed that using the main meeting room for the entirety of the meeting be beneficial as it would also serve as the 3rd meeting space for committees and working groups to meet. 2. The conference format and schedule for the week was discussed in relation to meeting our goals. Concerns were expressed that the current layout of meetings does not provide exhibitors enough opportunity to meet with attendees. Moving forward the group will take this into consideration so that we can identify opportunities within the conference schedule that exhibitors can be given greater focus in order to enrich their experience and make coming to these meetings more worthwhile. 3. Policies & Procedures were identified that the group would like to propose be waived for the duration of the fall 2018 meeting. The group recommends that policy III-C.E.1.a The host shall organize an Education Conference on Friday from 9am until noon, be waived for the entirety of the fall 2018 meeting and conference. 4. Content of the education conference will consist of both large body presentations in the main room and breakout session focused on different areas. We agreed that the breakout sessions will follow 2 tracks with 1 focused on topics pertaining directly to lifeguarding and 1 focused on secondary topics such as Lifesaving Sport, management practices and hot industry topics. 5. Continuing Education Units – Discussion on the benefits offering CEUs. Kyle Maxwell reported that the process for qualifying session for CEUs through the National Recreational Park Association is simple. We will need to identify our topics and speakers first and then apply with NRPA. Rob Edgerton reported on the difference between qualifying sessions for EMTs with the National Registry vs. the State. Mr. Edgerton noted that the process is easier at the state level and recommended that we pursue qualify sessions, once identified with the State of Florida. This we likely help with attracting new attendees from within the Southeast Region.

Committee Goals

1. To provide a more robust education component to the USLA Board of Directors Meeting and Conference in order to draw new attendees. Page 1 of 2 2. To provide greater opportunity for newcomers to be exposed to the business of the USLA by participating in committee meetings, discussions and social events.

Action Items (Requiring Board of Directors approval) 1. Shall the Board of Directors waive the Policy & Procedure III-C.E.1.a The host shall organize an Education Conference on Friday from 9am until noon, be waived for the entirety of the fall 2018 meeting and conference?

Page 2 of 2 United States Lifesaving Association Social Media Guidelines Committee Action Report

Date: April 28, 2018 Committee Chair: Tom Gill Committee Members: Jim McCray, Chris Linkletter, Jerry Gavin, Steve Himes, Mike Wagner, Jose Abasolo, Denise Blair, Chad Motz

Introduction

The Social Media Guidelines Committee met to finalize a proposal for Policies and Procedures regarding USLA Social Media Posts. While there is much to be accomplished in promoting the USLA and beach safety on social media, the purpose here was to provide a guide for those tasked with promoting the USLA’s message on social media. A draft proposal of the guidelines was created, modified and approved by the committee. A copy was submitted to Bylaws for approval and the final draft was recommended for approval to the Board of Directors and approve unanimously by the board. This completes the work of this committee.

Discussion Items (Not requiring Board of Directors approval)

1. USLA needs to streamline how social media is utilized. 2. Suggestion to set a schedule for monitoring and submitting social media posts.

Committee Goals

1. Not applicable. Action Items (Requiring Board of Directors approval)

1. Policies and Procedures regarding social media guidelines approved by board.

Attachments

1. Final Draft of Page to be placed in Policies and Procedures.

Page 1 of 1 USLA Social Media Policy

The United States Lifesaving Association is America's nonprofit professional association of beach lifeguards and open water rescuers. The USLA works to reduce the incidence of death and injury in the aquatic environment through public education, national lifeguard standards, training programs, promotion of high levels of lifeguard readiness, and other means. The USLA recognizes the use of social media as a means to further the mission of USLA in an open and extensively public forum. Because this is a public forum, the use of social media should promote positive, educational and inspirational stories regarding beach safety and the lifesavers who work to protect the public.

Posts that invariably embarrass or shine a negative light on USLA members should be distributed in non- public venues so that members may learn and be made aware of the stories, but airing those stories on public social media posts do nothing to further the mission of USLA nor promote the earned confidence of the public in the highly trained and functioning lifesavers of USLA Certified Agencies.

Thus the following guidelines should be followed by the USLA President and his/her designee in formulating USLA Social Media posts:

1. The President shall designate a limited number of representatives to make or forward posts on behalf of the USLA. 2. All social media posts shall be supervised by the USLA President or representatives appointed by the President. 3. Any posts created by or forwarded by the President of USLA or designated representatives should serve to highlight the following: a. Positive work by members b. Stories of interest in water safety c. Promotion of USLA sponsored or supported events d. Stories that serve to educate the public regarding beach safety 4. The USLA shall not post or forward stories, items that: a. Reflect negatively upon individual members or agencies b. Interject or promote stories based on employee versus employer contractual issues c. have content are mostly political in nature. d. have legal ramifications 5. The USLA reserves the right to remove or delete posts made on USLA social media sites. 6. Members that believe a post violates the guidelines set forth should contact their regional leadership or the USLA Social Media representative to register his/her complaint. The President or social media designees will determine if the post should be removed. United States Lifesaving Foundation Board of Directors Meeting — Long Beach, CA Minutes April 25, 2018

1. Attendance: Officers: B. Chris Brewster – President, Nikki Bowie – Secretary, Michael Bradley – Treasurer. Board Members: Tony Pryor – Gulf Coast Region, Jerry Gavin – Great Lakes Region, Ed Zebrowski – Mid-Atlantic Region, David Robinson – Northwest Region, Kalani Viera – Pacific Islands Region, Michael Wagner – South Atlantic Region, Gerry Falconer – Southeast Region, Bill Humphreys – Southwest Region 2. Investment update: An investment update was provided in writing to the Board. No questions or concerns were expressed by the Board. 3. Thanks to donors: A list of donors was provided in writing to the Board and is included in the annual report. 4. Review/approval of 2017 Annual Report: A draft annual report was presented to the Board. Mr. Wagner moved to approve the annual report. MPU 5. Rebalancing: Mr. Brewster informed the Board that the strategy for the investment fund has historically involved a rebalancing strategy to keep the funds close to 50/50. The plan, going forward, is to implement this approach by rebalancing the fund no more than twice each year (mid-year and end of year) if the funds are separated by more than 5% of the total of the two. For example, if one fund is 48% and the other 52% of the total, there will be no rebalancing; but if one fund is 47% and the other 53%, then they will be rebalanced to 50/50 by transferring from the fund with the higher balance to the fund with the lower balance. 6. Proposed disbursements: A calculation of the appropriate donation to the USLA was provided to the Board in writing. Mr. Falconer moved to approve a donation of $2,497.53 to the United States Lifesaving Association. MPU

Background: According to the Bylaws, “Following each annual Board of Directors meeting, the corporation shall distribute [to the United States Lifesaving Association] no more than one fifth (1/5) of annual gains from invested capital (as determined at each fiscal year-end) over the previous five-year period or five percent (5%) of the average fiscal year-end value of corporate investments during the previous five-year period, whichever amount is less. It is the express intent of the corporation to thus preserve and grow capital. Notwithstanding, prior to any distribution of funds, the Board of Directors shall first ensure that current and anticipated corporate expenses for the existing fiscal year are fully covered.” Averaging the annual gains from invested capital over the past five full years equals $3,165.53. Averaging the fiscal year-end value of corporate investments over the past four years and multiplying by 5% equals $2,497.53. Therefore, the lesser amount is $2,497.53. 7. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned. Attachments: - 2017 Annual Report (approved) - 2017 End of Year Investment Report United States Lifesaving Foundation 2017 Annual Report

According to the Bylaws of the United States Lifesaving Foundation, the board shall cause an annual report to be furnished not later than one hundred and twenty (120) days after the close of the corporation's fiscal year to all directors of the corporation. The fiscal year ends December 31.

Assets

The end of year assets of the USLF are comprised entirely of investments on account at Fidelity Investments. These assets are as follows:

$42,243.12 SPDR RUSSELL 3000 ETF $51,936.70 Fidelity Government Cash Reserves (money market fund) $94,179.82 Total

Asset Allocation: Fixed Income 55.2% - Stock Holdings 44.8%

Liabilities The USLF has no liabilities

Principle Changes in Assets and Liabilities $83,762.02 Opening value $3,180.00 Additions (income excluding dividends and interest) ($500.00) Withdrawals (see explanation below) ($0.00) Investment fees $7,737.80 Change in investment value (dividends, interest, and stock appreciation/depreciation) $94,179.82 Closing value

Expenses or Disbursements $0.00 Annual Contribution to the United States Lifesaving Association $0.00 Investment purchase fee $0.00 Total

*Due to an oversight in 2016, the USLA transferred $500 more to the USLF than it was due during that year. This was corrected in 2017 by having the USLA retain $500 in USLF donations. This is noted as a withdrawal to ensure that all donations are properly listed.

Donations AMOUNT DATE DONOR COMMENTS $1,000.00 10/1/16 Kyle Rykaczewski "USLA was a great influence on my future." $50.00 1/9/17 Faith Marshall "In Honor of Robert Arnold" "Thank you for the holiday greeting. Here is a holiday donation. Happy New $100.00 1/10/17 Robert Arnold Year. - Robert Arnold Ocean Lifeguard, retired, but for life. We've got you -- You're safe now." $25.00 2/22/17 David Comfort Online Donation (USLF) $75.00 2/27/17 Cheryl Burdiak $100.00 3/29/17 Jason Squire USLA Donation under $250. Move to Foundation $25.00 6/15/17 Chelsea Hutcheson Online Donation (USLF) USLA Donation under $250. Move to Foundation "The better we are Trained, $25.00 6/15/17 Daniel Corbett the more lives we train!" $75.00 6/16/17 Daniel Katayama USLA Donation under $250. Move to Foundation

Page 1 of 2

$20.00 6/17/17 Ann Finley USLA Donation under $250. Move to Foundation $100.00 6/19/17 Howard Lee $100.00 7/3/17 Newport Beach Jr. Lifeguards $50.00 7/3/17 Romano Family Chiropractic $5.00 7/10/17 Ian Junkin USLA Donation under $250. Move to Foundation $50.00 7/13/17 Christopher V Roderick USLA Donation under $250. Move to Foundation $25.00 7/14/17 Grant Howell USLA Donation under $250. Move to Foundation $25.00 7/14/17 Katelyn Hackett USLA Donation under $250. Move to Foundation $10.00 6/16/17 Richard Carlson USLA Donation under $250. Move to Foundation $25.00 7/17/17 Liam Foley Online Donation (USLF) $25.00 7/19/17 Ann Crane Online Donation (USLF) $25.00 7/26/17 Austin Michael Lilley USLA Donation under $250. Move to Foundation $100.00 7/27/17 Bill Griffith (Chief Steve Cushman Memorial Fund) $25.00 7/27/17 Earnest Horowitz USLA Donation under $250. Move to Foundation $25.00 7/31/17 Timothy Treadwell Online Donation (USLF) $100.00 7/31/17 Megan Wood (Chief Steve Cushman Memorial Fund) "Thinking of you, Shaena." (Chief Steve Cushman Memorial Fund) "Cush, you are a true Seal Beach icon. $25.00 7/31/17 Patricia Campbell You are one of the great ones that will never be forgotten. Say Hi to AJ for us, will you….." $100.00 7/31/17 Arthur Flores (Chief Steve Cushman Memorial Fund) (Chief Steve Cushman Memorial Fund) "Our loving thoughts are with the $250.00 7/31/17 Gail Koller family he had to leave behind." $25.00 8/3/17 Mark Cunningham (Chief Steve Cushman Memorial Fund) "A Great Guy." (Chief Steve Cushman Memorial Fund) "Much love to the entire Cushman $25.00 8/3/17 Cheris Kline family! You all are in my thoughts during this difficult time." $250.00 8/7/17 Don Pfohlman (Chief Steve Cushman Memorial Fund) (Chief Steve Cushman Memorial Fund) "I grew up with Steve and worked with $100.00 8/9/17 Stephen Scheiblauer him for three years. A great guy. I was fortunate to see him at last summer's LG reunion. He will be missed!" $100.00 8/16/17 Josh Benjoya Online Donation (USLF) $5.00 9/6/17 Tyler Curtis USLA Donation under $250. Move to Foundation $40.00 10/16/17 John Shealy Online Donation (USLF) $75.00 10/24/17 Michael Nuzzo "In recognition of Shannon Snell" $3,180.00 Total Donations Received

Page 2 of 2

2017 YEAR-END INVESTMENT REPORT January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017

Fidelity Account UNITED STATES LIFESAVING FOUND Account Number:

Envelope # BFBPZZBBBCMQL Your Account Value: $94,179.82 Change Since January 1: $10,417.80 UNITED STATES LIFESAVING FOUND BARTLETT C BREWSTER Beginning Account Value as of Jan 1, 2017 $83,762.02 PO BOX 366 Additions 2,680.00 HUNTINGTN BCH CA 92648-0366 Change in Investment Value * 7,737.80 Ending Account Value as of Dec 31, 2017 ** $94,179.82

FOR YOUR INFORMATION This statement is not a replacement for your tax forms and may not reflect all adjustments necessary for your tax reporting purposes. Refer to your IRS tax forms including your Form(s) 1099 and Form(s) 5498, which will be mailed to you under separate cover.

* Appreciation or depreciation of your holdings due to price changes plus any distribution and income earned during the statement period. ** Excludes unpriced securities. Contact Information Online Fidelity.com FASTSM-Automated Telephone (800) 544-5555 Premium Services (800) 544-4442 8am - 11pm ET, Mon - Fri YR_CE _BFBPZZBBBCMQL_BBBBB 20180114 S

Brokerage services provided by Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC (FBS), Member NYSE, SIPC (800) 544-6666. Brokerage accounts carried by National Financial Services LLC (NFS), Member NYSE, SIPC. 1 of 4

H28722489920171231 D Ending BalanceasofDec31, 2017 Total CashManagementActivity Deposits Cash ManagementActivity Total InvestmentActivity Dividends, Interest&OtherIncome Investment Activity Beginning BalanceasofJan1,2017 Core Account:FIDELITYGOVERNMENTCASHRESERVES Core AccountandCreditBalanceCashFlow * Total AccountTradesJan2017-Dec2017:0 Change SinceJanuary1 Account Value: Account Summary Ending AccountValueasofDec31,2017 Change inInvestmentValue* Additions Beginning AccountValueasofJan1,2017 Deposits Includes dividendreinvestments. income earnedduringthestatementperiod. Appreciation ordepreciationofyourholdingsduetopricechangesplusanydistributionand D $94,179.82 $10,417.80 $94,179.82 $83,762.02 $51,936.70 $20,494.37 $2,680.00 7,737.80 2,680.00 2,680.00 2,680.00 $959.28 959.28 interest andexemptdividends paidtoCaliforniaresidents. California requiresthatwereport to theCaliforniaFranchiseTaxBoardanymunicipalbond Total Ordinary Dividends Taxable Income Summary Total Mutual Funds ETPs Core Account Holding Type Account Holdings Funds 33% Mutual Dividends Jan 1,2017 42% ETPs Account 25% Core 2,9 4 5,3 55% $51,936 $83,762 24% $20,494 27,783 35,483 Value Jan 1 2017 YEAR-ENDINVESTMENTREPORT January 1,2017-December31, 45% ETPs Portfolio 100% Jan 1 33 42 % of Dec 31,2017 Account $94,179 22345 42,243 CORPORATION Dec 31 Value Dec 31,2017 - - Account 55% Core $978.41 $978.41 Portfolio 978.41 Dec 31 100% % of 2 of4

YR_CE _BFBPZZBBBCMQL_BBBBB 20180114 S Total Holdings MARKET ETF SPDR PORTFOLIOTOTALSTOCK Equity ETPs Description Includes exchange-tradedfunds(ETFs),notes(ETNs),andothervehicles. Exchange TradedProducts holdings) Total CoreAccount(55%ofaccount -- 7-dayyield:0.95% RESERVES FIDELITY GOVERNMENTCASH Description Core Account Holdings account holdings) Total ExchangeTradedProducts(45%of holdings) Total EquityETPs (45%ofaccount Total CostBasisdoesnotincludethecostbasisoncore,moneymarket orotherpositionswherecostbasisisunknownnotapplicable. (FDRXX) (SPTM)

Total incomeearnedonpositionsnolongerheld 51,936.700 ,7.0 3.10$2231 2,3.7$20,509.55 $21,733.57 $42,243.12 $33.2100 1,272.000 Quantity Quantity Per Unit Per Unit 100 5,3.0ntapial notapplicable notapplicable $51,936.70 $1.0000 Price Price

Market Value Market Value 9,7.2$1735 $20,509.55 $21,733.57 $94,179.82 $51,936.70 4,4.2$1735 $20,509.55 $21,733.57 $42,243.12 42,243.12 $11.81 Total Total Cost Basis Cost Basis 21,733.57 Total Total 2017 YEAR-ENDINVESTMENTREPORT January 1,2017-December31, Unrealized Unrealized anLs IncomeEarned Gain/Loss IncomeEarned Gain/Loss 20,509.55 Account CORPORATION $966.60 $266.87 $266.87 $699.73 $699.73 - 3 of4

YR_CE _BFBPZZBBBCMQL_BBBBB 20180114 S Information About Your Fidelity Statement using the FIFO method if shares were purchased at different times or prices. Statement Mailing We deliver statements at least four times during the calendar year for any account with a balance. TDD Service for the Hearing-Impaired Call 800-544-0118, 9 am - 9 pm ET, 7 days a week. Statement Discrepancies Please review your statement and report any inaccuracies or discrepancies. Lost or Stolen Cards For 24-Hour worldwide customer service, call 800-529-2164 for American Express or Inquiries, concerns or questions regarding your brokerage account or the activity therein should be 800-323-5353 for VISA® Gold Check Card. directed to FBS by calling 800-544-6666, and NFS, who carries your brokerage accounts, by calling Additional Investments with Fidelity Make checks payable to Fidelity Investments. Include your account 866-408-1138. Any oral communications regarding inaccuracies or discrepancies should be reconfirmed in number on the check. For retirement and health savings accounts (HSA), designate in the memo field whether writing to protect your rights, including those under the Securities Investor Protection Act (SIPA). your contribution is for the current or prior year. Mail checks or other inquiries to: Fidelity Investments, P.O. Box Material Changes Please advise us of material changes in your investment objectives or financial situation 770001, Cincinnati, OH 45277-0003. related to your brokerage account(s). Income Summary Shows income by tax status for the statement and year-to-date periods. Except for interest Mutual Funds and Performance Before investing, consider the funds' investment objectives, risks, income earned on, or distributed by, tax-exempt securities, Fidelity reports dividends and capital gains held in charges and expenses. Contact Fidelity for a prospectus containing this information. Read it carefully. taxable accounts as taxable income. A portion of income reported as tax-exempt income may be subject to Performance data shown represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results. alternative minimum taxes and/or state and local taxes. In Traditional IRAs, Rollover IRAs, SEP-IRAs, SIMPLE Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, so you may have a gain or loss when shares are IRAs and Keoghs, earnings are reported as tax-deferred income. In Roth IRAs and HSAs, earnings are reported sold. Current performance may be higher or lower than that quoted. Visit Fidelity.com/performance for as tax-exempt income as they may be federally tax-exempt if certain conditions are met. most recent month-end performance. Cost Basis, Gain/Loss, and Holding Period Information NFS is required to report certain cost basis and Sales Loads & Fees Each fund reserves the right to terminate or modify its exchange privilege in the future. In holding period information to the IRS on Form 1099-B. Unless otherwise specified, NFS applies the average connection with (i) access to, purchase or redemption of, and/or maintenance of positions in mutual funds and cost method for open-end mutual funds and the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method for all other securities. Cost other investment products ("funds") or (ii) infrastructure needed to support such funds, some funds, or their basis is adjusted for wash sales on securities with the same CUSIP held in the same account (unless your investment affiliates, pay FBS and/or NFS sales loads and 12b-1 fees described in the prospectus as well as account receives mark-to-market reporting). Your statement may not reflect all adjustments required for tax additional compensation for shareholder services, start-up fees, infrastructure support and maintenance, and purposes. Customers should consult their tax advisors for further information. other programs. Additional information about the source(s) and amount(s) of compensation as well as other Cost Fidelity provides purchase cost information for securities held in retirement and HSA accounts. Such remuneration received by FBS or NFS will be furnished to you upon written request. At the time you purchase information may be adjusted for certain transactions and does not reflect dividends or capital gains shares of funds those shares will be assigned either a load, transaction fee (TF) or no transaction fee (NTF) reinvestments. Fidelity reports transaction profit or loss information when securities are sold within a retirement status. When you subsequently sell those shares, any fees applicable to your transaction will be assessed or HSA account. Transaction profit or loss is calculated by subtracting purchase cost from sales proceeds based on the status assigned to the shares at the time of purchase.

Additional Information About Your Brokerage Account, If Applicable Executing Orders on the Floor of the NYSE The Floor broker may permit the Designated Market Maker to trade on parity with the order for some or all of the executions associated with filling that order, where such Free credit balances (FCB) are funds payable to you on demand. FCB are subject to open commitments such permission would not be inconsistent with the broker's best execution obligations. Agency Trades Individual as uncleared checks and exclude proceeds from sales of certificated securities without delivery of the securities trades placed for your Fidelity® Personalized Portfolios account are completed on an agency basis certificate. If your FCB is swept to a core position, you can liquidate the core position and have the proceeds by FBS. sent to you or held in your account subject to the terms of your account agreement. Required rule 10b-10(a) SIPC Securities in accounts carried by NFS, a Fidelity Investments company, are protected in accordance with information not contained herein will be provided on written request. Assets Separate from Your Brokerage the SIPC up to $500,000 (including cash claims limited to $250,000). For details, including the SIPC brochure, Account Only securities in the margin portion of your brokerage account contribute to margin and maintenance please see www.sipc.org or call 1-202-371-8300. NFS has arranged for additional protection for cash and requirements. Other Assets, which may be reported on your statement, including insurance products that are covered securities to supplement its SIPC coverage. Neither coverage protects against a decline in the market distributed by FBS and Fidelity Insurance Agency, Inc. and mutual fund only accounts held directly with the fund value of securities. (Fidelity Mutual Fund Accounts) are not carried by NFS, not covered by the Securities Investor Protection Fidelity Investments Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC) is the distributor for Fidelity Funds with marketing Corporation (SIPC) and do not count toward your margin and maintenance requirements. Assets held in and shareholder services provided by FBS or NFS. Brokerage services are provided by FBS, which clears brokerage accounts managed by Strategic Advisers, Inc. (SAI) are carried by NFS and covered by SIPC but do all transactions through its affiliate, NFS. NFS carries all brokerage accounts. FBS and NFS are

not contribute to your margin and maintenance requirements. Short Account Balances Securities sold short members of the NYSE and SIPC. FBS, NFS, and FDC are direct or indirect subsidiaries of FMR LLC. Upon S are held in a segregated short account. These securities are marked-to-market for margin purposes, and any written request, Fidelity will mail an NFS financial statement, which is also available for inspection at its office. increase or decrease from the previous week's value is transferred weekly to your margin account. Fidelity Fidelity Investments (with pyramid logo) is a trademark of FMR LLC. represents your short account balance as of the last weekly mark-to-market, not as of the statement end date. SAI Services Fidelity Portfolio Advisory Service®, Fidelity® Strategic Disciplines, Fidelity Wealth Management Information About Your Option Transactions Each transaction confirmation previously delivered to you AdvisorySM, and BlackRock® Diversified Income Portfolio are services provided by SAI, a registered investment contains full information about commissions and other charges, and such information is available promptly adviser and a Fidelity Investments company. Fidelity GoSM is a service provided by SAI and Geode Capital upon request. Assignments of American and European-style options are allocated among customer short Management LLC, an unaffiliated registered investment adviser. Fidelity® Personalized Portfolios may be positions pursuant to a random allocation procedure, a description is available upon request. Short positions in offered through SAI or Fidelity Personal Trust Company, FSB (FPTC), a federal savings bank. Non-deposit American-style options are liable for assignment anytime. The writer of a European-style option is subject to investment products and trust services offered through FPTC and its affiliates are not insured or guaranteed by exercise assignment only during the exercise period. For more information, please call Fidelity at the FDIC or any other government agency, are not obligations of any bank, and are subject to risk, including 800-544-6666. Equity Dividend Reinvestment Shares credited to your account resulted from transactions by possible loss of principal. These advisory services are provided for a fee. FBS acting as agent for your account, or the Depository Trust Company (DTC). Price Information/Total Ratings Information from Standard & Poors ("S&P") may not be reproduced. S&P credit ratings are Market Value The Total Market Value has been calculated out to 9 decimal places; however, the individual unit statements of opinion and are not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell securities, price is displayed in 5 decimal places. The Total Market Value represents prices obtained from various nor do they address the suitability of securities for investment purposes, and should not be relied on as sources, may be impacted by the frequency with which such prices are reported and such prices are not investment advice. S&P does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of any guaranteed. Prices received from pricing vendors are generally based on current market quotes, but when such information, including ratings, and is not responsible for errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise). S&P gives quotes are not available the pricing vendors use a variety of techniques to estimate value. These estimates, no express or implied warranties, including but not limited to any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particularly for fixed income securities, may be based on certain minimum principal amounts (e.g. $1 million) particular purpose or use. S&P shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, and may not reflect all of the factors that affect the value of the security, including liquidity risk. The prices punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including lost income or provided are not firm bids or offers. Certain securities may reflect N/A or unavailable where the price for such profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of ratings. security is generally not available from a pricing source. The Market Value of a security, including those priced Miscellaneous Mutual fund shares, other securities held in your account, and insurance products are neither at par value, may differ from its purchase price and may not closely reflect the value at which the security may deposits nor obligations of, nor endorsed or guaranteed by, any bank or other depositing institution, nor are they be sold or purchased based on various market factors. The sale or redemption of any fixed income security federally insured by the FDIC or any other agency. If you request a reprint of your statement, the disclosure prior to maturity may result in a loss. Prices for Certificates of Deposits (CDs) on your statement are generally information may not be the same as the information originally provided. To confirm that an authorized, direct estimates and are not based on actual market prices. The secondary market for CDs is generally illiquid. You deposit has been made to your Fidelity Account or Fidelity Mutual Fund Account, call Fidelity at should always request a current valuation for your securities prior to making a financial decision or placing an 1-800-544-5555. order. 588130.27.0 YR_CE _BFBPZZBBBCMQL_BBBBB 20180114

4 of 4